Top Banner
Open content and learning on Wikiversity Cormac Lawler CETIS ECSiG, 27th May 2008
14
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ec Sig Cormac

Open content and learning on Wikiversity

Cormac LawlerCETIS ECSiG, 27th May 2008

Page 2: Ec Sig Cormac

“Openness and inclusiveness are … our radical means to our radical ends.”

Jimmy Wales

Page 3: Ec Sig Cormac

Wikiversity

• Wikimedia Foundation (Wikipedia, Commons, Wikibooks, …) - all dedicated to open content

• Launched August 2006• Lengthy setting-up discussion - what should

it do?

Page 4: Ec Sig Cormac

Wikiversity is for..

• Learning materials• Learning activities• Learning communities• (i.e. both a repository of and a space for

learning)• All languages – and levels• All “open” / “free” / “libre”

Page 5: Ec Sig Cormac

Open content

• Essential freedoms:• Access (and Use!)• Share (redistribute)• Modify (editing original / copying and

“forking”)• Similar to Stallman/GNU’s open source

freedoms (see freedomdefined.org)

Page 6: Ec Sig Cormac

Free culture

• Driven by licensing• Sharing / collaboration / ‘remix’ etc• Culture shift (“anyone can edit my work?”)• Alternative models of production /

consumption (eg. wiki peer review)

Page 7: Ec Sig Cormac

Open learning

• Open Educational Resources (OER)• What about open educational spaces?• ‘Architecture for participation’, and an ‘Open

Participatory Learning Infrastructure’ (Atkins, Brown, Hammond)

• Wikiversity explicitly set up to address the question - how does learning work in a wiki? (Wikipedagogy?)

Page 8: Ec Sig Cormac

Learning, and the ‘wiki way’

• Collaborative writing• Discussing / debating (sometimes conflict)• Passion-based learning• Transparency of process - info/media-

literacy• Eg. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia “like a sausage:

you might like the taste of it, but you don't necessarily want to see how it's made”

(I argue the exact opposite!)

Page 9: Ec Sig Cormac

Examples from Wikiversity

• Instructor-led materials (Filmmaking)• Reading groups (Ivan Illich)• Collaborative workspaces / writings• Collaborative research (Bloom Clock)

Page 10: Ec Sig Cormac

Implications of ‘wiki way’

• Expertise problematic (though not anti-expert)

• Disclosures - what paradigm are you coming from?

• Multiple avenues for learning• Can a resource be “finished”?

Page 11: Ec Sig Cormac

Wikiversity’s role

• One of a growing no. of OER repositories• Peer-to-peer university / school (part of

‘meta-university’?)• Personal Learning Environment

Page 12: Ec Sig Cormac

Challenges [1]

…for Wikiversity:• ‘My’ content• PLE - is editability always good?• Forking in tension with collaboration• Mediawiki - limited technology?• How permissive are we? (eg. Nazism,

racism?)

Page 13: Ec Sig Cormac

Challenges [2]

…in general:• Licence proliferation• Silo effect• Metadata / tagging (searchability)• Open ideology (?)

Page 14: Ec Sig Cormac

[email protected]://cormaggio.org

http://en.wikiversity.orghttp://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Cormaggio