Top Banner
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE AN INTRODUCTION
38

Ebm !

Jan 21, 2017

Download

Education

ehab elbaz
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ebm !

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE

AN INTRODUCTION

Page 2: Ebm !
Page 3: Ebm !
Page 4: Ebm !
Page 5: Ebm !

What EBM is not ?• Something physicians have been doing for ages.• “Cookbook” medicine.• A tool for administrators and insurers.• Restricted to randomized trials and systematic reviews.• Opposed to patient centered medicine.

Page 6: Ebm !

What is the need?• Cost• Delay of "bench-to-bedside" research• Managing the primary literature• Counter misleading marketing• Dealing with conflicting results

Why EBM?

Page 7: Ebm !

What is the need?• Cost• Delay of "bench-to-bedside" research• Managing the primary literature• Counter misleading marketing• Dealing with conflicting results

Why EBM?

increasing pressure to • demonstrate effectiveness of interventions• utilize the most cost effective measures

How do you know what really works or is the most cost effective?

Page 8: Ebm !

Delay of "bench-to-bedside" research:

Why EBM?

Secondary Research

Routine Clinical Practice

Primary Literature

Years-to-Decades

Page 9: Ebm !

Delay of "bench-to-bedside" research:

Why EBM?

Secondary Research

Routine Clinical Practice

Primary Literature

Thrombolytic Drugs for acute MI:

6 years from the first Systematic Reviews of RCTs until most review articles and textbooks recommended their use.(Antman, Lau, et al. JAMA 1992)

Page 10: Ebm !

Delay of "bench-to-bedside" research:

Why EBM?

Secondary Research

Routine Clinical Practice

Primary Literature

Aspirin after acute MI:

Not recommended by expert opinion until 6 years after the first systematic review.(Antman, Lau, et al. JAMA 1992)

Page 11: Ebm !
Page 12: Ebm !

Managing the primary literature

Why EBM?

• MEDLINE add 60,000 articles / year from 120

journals • Just within their own fields, physicians would need

to read 19 articles per day, 365 days per year, to keep up with research. (Oxford Center for EBM)

• Not all (~10%) of these articles are considered high quality and clinically relevant. (Oxford)

EBM helps you find the most appropriate article for a specific clinical question.

Page 13: Ebm !

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

Biomedical MEDLINE Trials Diagnostic?

Med

ical

Arti

cles

per

Yea

r

5,000?per day

2,000 per day

75 per dayAr

ticle

s Per

Yea

r

Why do we need to use evidence efficiently?

EBP: informing decisions with the best up-to-date evidence

Page 14: Ebm !

• Counter misleading marketing

Why EBM?

Pharmaceutical companies invest considerable resources to promote products based on skewed or selective evidence (or emotion appeals through direct-to-consumer advertising). EBM provides tools to help alert clinicians to potentially misleading marketing.(Glasziou, Hayes. The paths from research to improved health outcomes, Evidenced Based Nursing, 2005; 8(2):36-8.)

Page 15: Ebm !

Dealing with conflicting results

Why EBM?

• Beta-blockers initially avoided after MI due to pathophysiologic reasoning that they would decrease compensatory sympathetic mechanisms

• Later shown to decrease hospitalization & death:

Page 16: Ebm !

Dealing with conflicting results

Why EBM?

• Based on 16 cohort studies (and some physiologic reasoning) HRT used to be recommended for postmenopausal women to reduce the risk of CHD.

• Women’s Health Initiative show it actually increased the risk of MI, stroke, and venous thromboembolism:

Page 17: Ebm !

Dealing with conflicting results

Why EBM?

• Since the 1960s, lidocaine was used for VF & VT prophylaxis in patients with acute MI.

• A meta-analysis showed some reduction in VF & VT, but a probably increase in actual mortality:

Page 18: Ebm !

JASPA*(Journal associated score of personal anxiety)

J: Are you ambivalent about renewing your JOURNAL subscriptions?A: Do you feel ANGER towards productive authors?S: Do you ever use journals to help you SLEEP?P: Are you surrounded by PILES of PERIODICALS?A: Do you feel ANXIOUS when journals arrive?

YOUR SCORE? (0 TO 5)

* Modified from: BMJ 1995;311:1666-1668

Page 19: Ebm !

Median minutes/week spent reading about my patients:

Self-reports at 17 Grand Rounds:

• Medical Students: 90 minutes• House Officers (PGY1): 0 (up to 70%=none)• SHOs (PGY2-4): 20 (up to 15%=none)• Registrars: 45 (up to 40%=none)• Sr. Registrars 30 (up to 15%=none)• Consultants:• Grad. Post 1975: 45 (up to 30%=none)• Grad. Pre 1975: 30 (up to 40%=none)

Page 20: Ebm !

Size of Medical Knowledge

• 2 million concept names• 11,000 diseases• 30,000 abnormalities (symptoms, signs, lab, X-ray,)• 3,200 drugs

Page 21: Ebm !

Are we (currently) equipped to tell good from bad research ?

• BMJ study of 607 reviewers• 14 deliberate errors inserted

• Detection rates• Poor Randomisation (by name or day) - 47%• Not intention-to-treat analysis - 22%

Schroter et al

Page 22: Ebm !
Page 23: Ebm !

A study of resident's attitude, knowledge and barriers towards the use of evidence based medicine (Resaei et al,2013)

Page 24: Ebm !
Page 25: Ebm !

Ask Clinical Questions

Patient/Population OutcomeIntervention/

Exposure Comparison

Components of Clinical Questions

In patients withacute MI

In post-menopausal

women

In women withsuspected

coronary disease

does early treat-ment with a statin

what is the accuracy of

exercise ECHO

does hormonereplacement

therapy

compared to placebo

compared to exercise

ECG

compared to noHRT

decrease cardio-vascular mortality?

for diagnosingsignificant

CAD?

increase therisk of

breast cancer?

Page 26: Ebm !

‘Background’ Questions

• About the disorder, test, treatment, etc.

2 components:a. Root* + Verb: “What causes …”b. Condition: “… Pneumonia?”

• * Who, What, Where, When, Why, How

Page 27: Ebm !

‘Foreground’ Questions• About patient care decisions and actions

4 (or 3) components:

a. Patient, problem, or population

b. Intervention, exposure, or maneuver

c. Comparison (if relevant)

d. Clinical Outcomes

Page 28: Ebm !

Background & Foreground

Page 29: Ebm !

Foreground Questions: PICO (5 main questions) 1. How common is the problem? Prevalence

2. Is early detection worthwhile? Screening

3. Is the diagnostic test accurate? Diagnosis

4. What will happen if we do nothing? Prognosis

5. Does this intervention help?

Treatment 5. What are the common harms of an intervention?5. What are the rare harms of an intervention?

Page 30: Ebm !

Type of Question Suggested best type of Study

Therapy RCT>cohort > case control > case series

Diagnosis Prospective, blind comparison to a gold standard

Etiology/Harm RCT > cohort > case control > case series

Prognosis Cohort study > case control > case series

Prevention RCT>cohort study > case control > case series

Cost Economic analysis

Page 31: Ebm !

[1.]

Sources for Background Questions :• Textbooks• Handbooks• Manuals

Background Questions

Acquire

Page 33: Ebm !

THE EVIDENCE PYRAMID

Page 34: Ebm !

“A 21st century clinician who cannot critically read a study is as

unprepared as one who cannot take a blood pressure or examine the

cardiovascular system.”BMJ 2008:337:704-705

Page 35: Ebm !

The 6 Prerequisites for successful Literature Searching

1• Know how to use a computer/electronic device.

2• Know the Internet Jargon of Terms.

3• Know the EBM Jargon of Terms.

4• Know how to formulate your question.

5• Know where to go.

6• Know what to do when you get there: the site’s technical language/know-how.

Page 36: Ebm !

For Whom?

Page 37: Ebm !

Chairman Nursing ManagerResident

Clinical DirectorQuality

Nurse

Page 38: Ebm !