Investment Modeling for Biofuels and Biochemicals Lawrence D. Sullivan & Company, Inc. Larry Sullivan, Project Management Consultant Adjunct Faculty, Trident Technical College Carla M. Wood, Ph.D. Lawrence D. Sullivan & Company, Inc. Presentation for the Sixth Annual Biofuel Law and Regulation Conference University of Illinois Urbana – Champaign, Illinois May 2, 2014
19
Embed
EBI Investment Modeling for Biofuels and Biochemicals
Financial Models for Capital Assets in Renewable Fuels.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Investment Modeling for Biofuels
and Biochemicals
Lawrence D. Sullivan & Company, Inc.
Larry Sullivan, Project Management Consultant
Adjunct Faculty, Trident Technical College
Carla M. Wood, Ph.D.
Lawrence D. Sullivan & Company, Inc.
Presentation for the Sixth Annual Biofuel Law and
Regulation Conference
University of Illinois
Urbana – Champaign, Illinois
May 2, 2014
Lawrence D. Sullivan – Past & Present
20 Years in Oil & Gas (Dresser,
Imperial Chemical Industries &
Conoco/Dupont) as Petroleum
Engineer and Manager
Last 12 Years in Biofuels, Biomass,
Biochemicals - Early Stage Firms
15 Years Living and Working
Outside the USA – SEAsia, Middle
East, EU & Africa
Speaker at 25 Conferences –
Beginning at 2004 Biotechnica
Advisor to Gerson Lehrman Group
Clients as Top 2% Expert
Due Diligence for GLG Clients
Turner, Mason & Company - Oil
Refiner Acquisitions of Stranded
Biofuel Assets
Adjunct Faculty at Trident Technical
College
2
Carla M. Wood, Ph.D.
Academic Career
B.S., The Evergreen State College -Biochemistry
Ph.D., Texas A&M University –Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Post Doctorate, Baylor College of Medicine, Depts. of Cell Biology –Human DNA Repair, Cellular Transformation & Mutagenesis
Staff Scientist, NIH, National Institute on Aging, Molecular Genetics – Genes of Senescence, Stress Response, & DNA Damage
Research Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota – 1) Expression Analysis of Non-Receptor Protein Tyrosine Kinases in Childhood Leukemia 2) Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma
Return on Capital Employed (both equity and debt) or Equity
Beta of 1.0 moves with markets
Market Return is set by Investors
Risk Free example is United Kingdom Perpetual Bonds
ICCT reports that Beta on public biotech requires high ROCE for investment
5
The difference between return on assets and return on equity in a general
sense is based on gross versus net profits. Assets usually represent the market
price of durable goods such as real estate, automobiles, and heavy construction
equipment, and businesses themselves or investments like bonds that hold their
value over time. Equity, on the other hand, represents what the actual monetary
value of something is after all outstanding debts and liens have been subtracted
from it, and this can also include taxes that must be paid such as those on
retirement accounts or annuities when they are cashed in. Both return on assets
and return on equity calculations are often used in the investment community to
ascertain what the value of a business is if it has to be liquidated, or how much
built up value it has for determining a safe level of borrowing for business
growth. More specifically, however, return on assets (ROA) and return on equity
(ROE) are metrics that corporations use based off of company earnings or net
income to determine if the company is producing what is considered a healthy
profit and growth margin.
6
ROCE – Oil and Gas Extraction (2010)
High Risk, High Rewards
Return on Sales 13.43%
Return on Assets 6.67%
Return on Net Worth 13.04%
Quick Ratio 1.08
Current Ratio 1.38
Inventory Turnover 34.40
Note: Oil prices in 2010 averaged $80/bbl (WTI - Cushing, OK) and natural gas was $4.48 per 1,000,000 cubic feet at the wellhead.
7
ROCE - Extraction Industries: Agriculture
and Forestry (2010)
Return on Sales 7.81%
Return on Assets 8.30%
Return on Net Worth 19.41%
Quick Ratio 0.70
Current Ratio 1.31
Inventory Turnover 8.88
Note: Covers a Bizstats’ range (LLC, Inc., MLP) with Net Assets from $1 to $500,000 which
would include farmer-owned cooperative societies (LLCs, Inc.), independent forestry
owners and small time miners. Does not cover processors like ADM, Cargill, Bunge, etc. or
Real Estate Investment Trusts in forestry, agriculture and mining like Plum Creek or
Hancock.
8
ROCE - “Basic Chemicals” (2010)
Return on Sales 2.57%
Return on Assets 1.37%
Return on Net Worth 4.52%
Quick Ratio 0.74
Current Ratio 1.08
Inventory Turnover 9.96
Notes: Covers Bizstats data for both the chloro-alkali industry (NaCl, NaOH, Na, Cl, soda
ash, bicarbonate, NaO) and the sulfur (H2SO4) from both synthetic to mining. Not
petrochemicals or TiO2.
9
ROCE - Petroleum Refining (2010)
Return on Sales 6.14%
Return on Assets 3.83%
Return on Net Worth 9.34%
Quick Ratio 1.13
Current Ratio 1.21
Inventory Turnover 53.80
Notes: Covers Bizstats data for both independent refiners (e.g., Tesoro, Valero) and integrated oil & gas production companies who own refinery assets (e.g., Shell, ExxonMobil, Total, BP). It does notcover NYSE traded part State Owned Enterprises (SOE) of China, Brazil, Norway.
10
ROCE - conversion of raw materials to
petrochemical intermediates (2010)
Return on Sales 4.36%
Return on Assets 2.44%
Return on Net Worth 11.30%
Quick Ratio 0.97
Current Ratio 1.53
Inventory Turnover 7.76
Notes: this includes Bizstats heading “resins, synthetic rubber, and fibers &
filaments” for example polypropylene and not propylene, or PET resin and
not para-xylene, ethylene glycol or dimethyl terephthalate.
11
Why Make Biofuels? US Fuel Projections
12
What is Corn (Maize) Ethanol All About?
Missouri is “The Show Me State”
Source: University of Missouri - http://agebb.missouri.edu/
13
Corn (Maize) Ethanol – Follow the Money
Higher Yields, Better Basis and Farm Incomes Up
US Farm Policy is a Success
Bushels Per Acre!
14
As Corn (maize) Producers have Done Well
so have the Petroleum (Oil) Producers – However,
natural gas producers need to export from US(note “nominal” US$ per million btu)
15
The Two Primary Petrochemical Routes
There is no significant “Upgrade in Value”
16
Fundamental Economics - Petrochemicals
If integrated to large refinery complex (BASF, Shell, ExxonMobil,
Saudi Aramco, etc.), then petrochemicals are world class cost
basis
If a stand-alone facility, then purchasing of the key intermediates
could be disadvantaged depending upon locations in the world
Historic fuels/refinery ROI over 40 years averages 9.3%
Historic standalone petrochemicals are 16.7%
Most integrated refinery and petrochemical plants have ROI
between the two above since locations can widely vary the ROI