EARHTHING PERFORMANCE OF HV/MV SUBSTATION AND ITS EFFECT ON NEARBY STRUCTURES NORNIKMAN BIN RAHIMIN A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Engineering (Electrical-Power) Faculty of Electrical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia JUNE 2015
18
Embed
EARHTHING PERFORMANCE OF HV/MV SUBSTATION AND …eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/54608/1/NornikmanRahiminMFKE2015.pdfSistem grid pembumian pencawang sediada telah menggabungkan faktor keselamatan
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
EARHTHING PERFORMANCE OF HV/MV SUBSTATION AND ITS EFFECT
ON NEARBY STRUCTURES
NORNIKMAN BIN RAHIMIN
A project report submitted in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Electrical-Power)
Faculty of Electrical Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
JUNE 2015
ii
Specially dedicated to my beloved parent,
Rahimin bin Ismail and Norhayati binti Lop Ahmad,
my lovely wife Noriratul Mazuin Binti Mazani,
my doughter Nurin Auni Irdina, in-laws parents, families and siblings,
whom endlessly supporting me throughout my journey of education.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful, Praise be to Allah, the
Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds. With His permission I have completed my
Master Degree of Electrical Engineering (Power) and hopefully this works will
benefit the development of the Ummah all over the world.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr.
Zulkurnain Abdul Malek, who has supported me throughout my work with his
guidance, patience, motivation, enthusiasm and enormous knowledge whilst
allowing me the room to work in my own way. I attribute the level of my Master
Degree to his encouragement and effort which without him this report would
not have been possible to be written and completed. It is an honor for me having
this opportunity doing the project under his supervision.
In preparing this project report, I was in contact with several people,
researchers, academicians, and practitioners. They have contributed towards my
understanding and thoughts In particular, I would like to convey my deep sense of
appreciation to TNB staff from Transmission Division and TNBR for their guidance,
helps, and advices throughout the progress of the project.
Last but not least, my sincere appreciation also extends to all my family,
colleagues, administrative staffs at Faculty of Electrical Engineering, UTM and
others who have provided assistance at various occasions. Their views and tips are
useful indeed. I owe my deepest appreciation to my beloved wife Noriratul Mazuin
Bt Mazani for supporting me spiritually throughout my life. May Allah s.w.t will
bless all of you.
iv
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, with more of suburban area developed into an urban area, power
system for transmission and distribution have become more critical with the growing
of load demand in the area. A substation, previously located away from other other
structures, are now standing next to residential buildings and other public structures,
raising concerns over public safety factor. Increasing energy demands have caused
the utility company to increase the capacity of a substation, and hence consequently
increases the system fault current level. The existing and installed earthing grid
systems had incorporated the safety factor based on the old fault current level, which
is now may not be sufficient for the new fault current level capacity. During the
propagation of fault current, there exist the earth potential rise (EPR) along the
conductor at the surface of the soil, the touch potential (TP), and the step potential
(SP), all of which may become lethal when over a certain level. The values of ERP,
TP and SP must comply to the safety level as described in the IEEE 80-2000
standard. Several factors that contribute to the ERP value are the fault current level,
soil resistivity and grid geometry. The CDEGS (Current Distribution,
Electromagnetic Fields, Grounding and Soil Structure Analysis) software was used
to analyse the effects of changes in the fault current level, soil resistivity and grid
geometry to a substation earthing grid performances as well as to the earthing grids
of nearby structures. Simulation results show that TP and SP values at nearby
structure are significantly increased with the increasing of fault current and soil
resistivityIn the worst case, the TP increases to more than 4000% and the SP to more
than 5000%.Appropriate improvements to the existing substation earthing grid
system, namely, increment in the mesh conductor numbers, increment in the number
of installed vertical rods, and incremment in the depth of the vertical rod, were
proposed. Simulation results shows the proposed improvement methods significantly
improve the TP and SP values.
v
ABSTRAK
Pada masa ini, banyak kawasan pinggir bandar telah membangun menjadi
kawasan bandar, sistem kuasa untuk penghantaran dan pengagihan telah menjadi
lebih kritikal dengan pertambahan permintaan beban di kawasan tersebut. Sebuah
pencawang dahulunya terletak jauh dari struktur-struktur lain lain, kini terletak
bersebelahan dengan bangunan-bangunan kediaman dan struktur-struktur awam lain
dan ianya telah menimbulkan kebimbangan terhadap faktor keselamatan awam.
Keperluan tenaga yang bertambah telah memaksa syarikat utiliti meningkatkan
keupayaan pencawang terlibat, dan ini telah sekaligus meningkatkan tahap arus rosak
sistem sedia ada. Sistem grid pembumian pencawang sediada telah menggabungkan
faktor keselamatan berdasarkan tahap arus rosak lama, yang berkemungkinan tidak
mencukupi untuk kapasiti paras arus rosak yang baru. Semasa pengagihan arus
rosak, wujud kenaikan potensi bumi (EPR) di permukaan tanah di sepanjang
konduktor. Potensi sentuhan dan potensi langkah (SP) (TP) akan terhasil, yang mana
ianya mungkin membawa maut apabila melepasi satu tahap tertentu. Nilai ERP, TP
dan SP mestilah mematuhi tahap selamat sebagai ditetapkan di dalam piawaian IEEE
80-2000. Beberapa faktor yang menyumbang kepada peningkatan nilai ERP ialah
tahap arus rosak, kerintangan tanah dan geometri grid. CDEGS (Current
Distribution, Electromagnetic Fields, Grounding and Soil Structure Analysis) ialah
perisian yang digunakan untuk menganalisis kesan dari perubahan tahap arus rosak ,
kerintangan tanah dan geometri grid kepada kecekapan grid pembumian sebuah
pencawang, serta grid pembumian struktur-struktur berdekatan. Keputusan simulasi
menunjukkan bahawa nilai TP and SP di struktur berdekatan nyata sekali bertambah
dengan penambahan arus rosak dan nilai kerintangan tanah, di dalam kes terburuk,
nilai TP bertambah sebanyak lebih 4000% dan SP bertambah lebih daripada 5000%
daripada nilai normalnya. Penambahbaikan yang bersesuaian boleh dilakukan kepada
sistem grid pembumian pencawang sediada, iaitu dengan menambah bilangan
konduktor pada grid, meningkatkan jumlah dipasang rod menegak dan mendalamkan
kedalaman rod menegak, telah dicadangkan. Keputusan simulasi menunjukkan
kaedah penambahbaikan ini dapat memperbaiki nilai TP and SP.
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION i
DEDICATION ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
ABSTRACT iv
ABSTRAK v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF TABLES viii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Problem Statement 3
1.3 Objectives 3
1.4 Scope of the Project 4
1.5 Report Outline 4
2 EARTHING GRID SYSTEM 6
2.1 Introduction 6
2.2 Earth Potential Rise (EPR) 7
2.3 Grounding Grid Consideration 8
2.4 Mathematical Equation 9
2.5 IEEE Standard for Substation Grounding System 12
2.6 Critical Review of Previous Work 12
2.6.1 Soil Resistivity and Soil Characteristic 12
2.6.2 Fault Current Level 14
2.6.4 Effects on Near By Structure 14
vii
2.7 Summary 15
3 METHODOLOGY 16
3.1 Introduction 16
3.2 Modelling Earhting Grid And Simulation
using CDEGS 17
3.3 Earthing Grid System Performance
Analysis 17
3.4 Case study 19
3.5 Soil Resistivity Data 19
3.6 Grounding Grid Construction 23
3.7 Earthing Grid Energization Factor 24
3.8 Safety Limit 25
3.9 Summary 26
4 EFFECTS OF FAULT CURRENT LEVEL
AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS 27
4.1 Introduction 27
4.2 Case Study 1 27
4.2.1 Actual Soil Resistivity
(Soil 1: control sample) 27
4.2.2 Soil Resistivity Increased
by 2 Times (Soil 2) 29
4.2.3 Soil Resistivity Increased
by 5 Times (Soil 3) 31
4.2.4 Soil Resistivity Increased
by 10 Times (Soil 4) 32
4.2.5 Case Study 1 Result Comparisons 34
4.3 Case Study 2 35
4.3.1 10kA fault current 35
4.3.2 20kA fault current (Soil 1) 36
4.3.3 20kA fault current (Soil 4) 37
viii
4.3.4 30kA fault current (Soil 1) 39
4.3.5 30kA fault current (Soil 4) 41
4.3.6 Case Study 2 Result Comparisons 42
4.4 Case Study 3 43
4.4.1 Adjacent Grid, 10kA fault current (Soil1) 44
4.4.2 Adjacent Grid, 10kA fault current (Soil4) 45
4.4.3 Adjacent Grid, 20kA fault current (Soil1) 47
4.4.4 Adjacent Grid, 20kA fault current (Soil4) 49
4.4.5 Adjacent Grid, 30kA fault current (Soil1) 50
4.4.6 Adjacent Grid, 30kA fault current (Soil4) 52
4.4.7 Case Study 3 Result Comparisons 54
4.5 Summary 55
5 SUBSTATION EARTHING GRID IMPROVEMENT 56
5.1 Introduction 56
5.2 Increasing Mesh Conductors Number 57
5.2.1 Modelling in SESCAD 57
5.2.2 MALT Simulation Results 58
5.3 Increasing the Number of Installed Vertical Rod 58
5.3.1 Modelling in SESCAD 59
5.3.2 MALT Simulation Results 60
5.4 Deepen the Depth of Vertical Rod 60
5.4.1 Modelling in SESCAD 61
5.4.2 MALT Simulation Results 61
5.5 Comparison for Grid Improvement Result 62
5.6 Summary 63
6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION
6.1 General Conclusion 64
6.2 Recommendation for Future Study 66
REFERENCES 67
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
3.1 Actual measurement reading from 132kV/33kV
Setia Alam substation 19
3.2 Increased soil resistivity data 21
4.1 Results comparisons for case study 1 34
4.2 Results comparisons for case study 2 43
4.3 Results comparisons for case study 3 54
5.1 Comparison of different improvement method 63
x
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Basic Shock situation in IEEE 80-2000 standard 7
2.2 Wenner method measurement arrangement 19
3.1 Flow chart of project methodology 16
3.2 Flow chart of CDEGS methodology 18
3.3 Soil 1 soil characteristic graph 21
3.4 Soil 2 soil characteristic graph 22
3.5 Soil 3 soil characteristic graph 22
3.6 Soil 4 soil characteristic graph 23
3.7 Main earthing grid construction in SESCAD 24
3.8 Earthing grid energization in MALT module. 24
3.9 Short circuit fault current level in TNB’s ESAH 26
3.10-3.11 MALT module safety limit setting and value 26