Top Banner
E-Learning: Old Wine in a New Bottle? Mark Bullen Expo E-Learning, Barcelona March 20, 2009
35

E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Dec 05, 2014

Download

Education

Mark Bullen

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning: Old Wine in a New Bottle?

Mark Bullen

Expo E-Learning, Barcelona

March 20, 2009

Page 2: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Main Point

E-Learning is not newhistory is important

Page 3: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

What is E-Learning?

Page 4: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Looking to the Past

Much of what we think is new is not

Page 5: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Looking to the Past

John Dewey (1859-1952) Jean Piaget (1896-1980)

Constructivism

Page 6: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Looking to the PastLearner-centered education

Socrates Confucius

Page 7: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Looking to the Past

E-learning and distance educationHas its roots in distance educationDates back to the 1700s correspondence educationAudiovisual devices - early 1900sEducational television - 1960sEffective course development model

Page 8: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

History: Pre-Internet

Early online learningComputer-mediated Communication (CMC)Collaboration, knowledge construction

Many-to-many communication, time and place independence

Asynchronous text-based communication as a facilitator of collaboration, knowledge construction

(Harasim, 1990; Harasim et al., 1995)

Page 9: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

History: The Internet Era- Web 1.0

Internet, course management systems (CMS) changed our understanding of online learning

CMS not about communication, collaboration, knowledge construction

CMS about efficient distribution of contentTeacher-centered Internet as a delivery mechanism

Page 10: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

History: The Internet Era - Web 2.0

A return to the pre-Internet era?

Architecture of presentation

Architecture of participation

Page 11: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

History: The Internet Era - Web 2.0

Harnessing the potential of easy to use tools

Facilitating collaboration, production

User-generated content

Openness

Page 12: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning Today

Page 13: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning 10 years ago

Page 14: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Education in the New Millenium

Page 15: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning Today

Page 16: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning Today

Dominant instructional design model information transmission supported by asynchronous

online “discussion”

Page 17: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Blogs

Page 18: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Wikis

Page 19: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Social Bookmarking

Page 20: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Virtual Worlds

Page 21: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

…..casting

Page 22: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Synchronous Communication Tools

Web conferencing

Instant messaging

Page 23: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

E-Learning Today

But are these tools changing the dominant instructional design paradigm?Online delivery remains primarily text-based,

information delivery Constructivist, collaborative, online knowledge

building community is rareTechnology still largely being used to replicate earlier

modes of teaching - the electronic classroom

Page 24: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

The Future

Page 25: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

The Future

Radical change or status quo?

Technology is changingContinuing development of Web 2.0

Learners are changing…we think

Page 26: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Learner Changes

Net generationBorn after 1982Never know life without the Internet

CharacteristicsDigitally literateConnected ImpatientExperiential

Page 27: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Learner Changes

Characterstics of Net generationSocialTeam playersNeed for structureVisual and kinesthicNeed for interactivityCommunity minded

Page 28: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Learner Changes

How accurate is this portrayal?

Different social and technological context

BCIT research

Page 29: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Learning 2.0

• Focus on learning processes

• Focus on communication & interaction

• Co-developed with learners & instructors shaping the design

• Customized/personalized

• Focus on knowledge & understanding

• Learner-paced

Page 30: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Learning 2.0

Collaborative: one to many, many to many

Feedback rich

Page 31: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Technology 2.0

Less reliance on enterprise solutions

The web as platform

Easy to use, free, often open, tools

Page 32: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Personal Learning Environments

“A facility for an individual to access, aggregate, configure and manipulate digital artifacts of their ongoing learning experiences.” - Ron Lubensky

http://members.optusnet.com.au/rlubensky/2006/12/present-and-future-of-personal-learning.html

Page 33: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

Concluding Comments

E-learning is not as new as we think

Current e-learning practice is fairly conservative

Changing technology, changing learners

Heterogeneity of learners

Check assumptions

Technology potential not always realized

Page 34: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

ReferencesBates, A.W. (2000). Managing Technological Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bereiter, C. & Scardamelia, M. Catching the Third Wave. Queen's Education Letter, Issue #2: Integrating ICT in Teaching and Learning

Bullen, M. & Janes, D. (Eds.)(2007). Making the Transition to E-Learning: Strategies and Issues. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

Harasim, L. (1990). Online Education: An Environment for Collaboration and Intellectual Amplifcation. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment (pp. 39-64). New York: Praeger.

Harasim, L., Hiltz, S., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Oblinger, D.G. & Oblinger, J.L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Available at http://www.educause.edu/EducatingtheNetGeneration/

Sinclair, G., McClarin, M. & Griffin, M.J. (2006). E-Learning and Beyond. Discussion paper prepared as part of the Campus 2020 process for the Ministry of Advance Education.

Zemsky , R. & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted Innovation: What Happened to E-learning and Why. The Learning Alliance.

Page 35: E-Learning: Old Wine, New Bottle?

For Further Information

Mark [email protected]://www.markbullen.cahttp://www.bcit.ca/ltc