8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
1/45
Dyslipidemia: Managing a KeyCardiovascular Risk Factor
AIMGP Clinic Seminar
Updated by R. CavalcantiSep 2007
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
2/45
Outline
Current Practice GuidelinesCasesGlobal Risk Assessment
Whom to Screen for Dyslipidemia?Risk Categories & Lipid TargetsFactors Influencing Risk Assessment
Selected StudiesManagementCases Revisited
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
3/45
Current Practice Guidelines
Canadian Guidelines Recommendations for the management of
dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular
disease: summary of the 2003 update CMAJ169(9):921-4, 28 Oct 2003
www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/169/9/921/DC1 CCS Position Statement on Dx and Rx
dyslipidemia. Canadian Journal of Cardiology2006;22(11):913-927
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/169/9/921/DC1http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/169/9/921/DC18/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
4/45
Current Practice Guidelines
American Guidelines Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National
Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel
III Guidelines Circulation 110:227-39, 13 July 2004
Third Report of the National Cholesterol EducationProgram (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterolin Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA 285(19):2486-97, 16 May 2001
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
5/45
Case 1
56 M Acute MI 4 months ago No current cardiovascular symptoms
Tested for DM post-MI Negative Non-smoker, no HTN
Lipids measured while in hospital post-MI:
TC 4.2, LDL 2.5, HDL 1.3, TG normal (TC/HDL 3.2)What is his estimated risk of a cardiovascularevent in the next 10 years?How should you manage his lipids?
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
6/45
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
7/45
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
8/45
Current Challenges inCardiovascular Risk ReductionAging Population >20% Canadians will be >65 years old by 2011 1,900,000 Canadians >80 years old by 2026
Obesity 31% of Canadians are obese Especially if abdominal adiposity, associated with
increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome features(DM, HTN, TGs, HDL, insulin resistance)
Associated with inflammatory markers (CRP, IL -6)
Diabetes 60,000 new cases per year in Canada
3,000,000 Canadians with DM by 2010
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
9/45
Global Risk Assessment
Hyperlipidemia is an important risk factor,and should be used to assess overall cardio-vascular riskGlobal CV risk should be used to assesstreatment goals and modalitiesCardiac endpoints: non-fatal MI death due to CAD
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
10/45
Global Risk Assessment
Risk assessment model adapted from theFramingham Heart Study
This model only applies in: Patients without diabetes Patients without clinically evident
cardiovascular disease (prior CAD, ischemicstroke, PAD) or CRF
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
11/45
Global Risk Assessment
Which patients are automatically consideredhigh risk (>20% 10-year risk)?
All adult patients with: DM History of CAD Ischemic stroke Peripheral arterial disease CRF ( < 60 ml/min of GFR)
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
12/45
Global Risk Assessment
What are the risk factors in Framinghamrisk calculator?
Age Gender Smoking history Lipid profile (TC, HDL) Systolic BP
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
13/45
If the calculated10-year risk is:
20% - High Risk
11-19% - ModerateRisk
10% - Low Risk
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
14/45
Whom to Screen forDyslipidemia?
Influenced by cardiac risk factors:By age alone (Canadian Guidelines): Men over age 40
Women over age 50 (or post-menopausal)Adults at any age if: At least 2 risk factors
DM, HTN, Smoking, Abdominal Obesity
Family history of early cardiovascular disease Physical signs of hyperlipidemia
Xanthomata, xanthelasmas, arcus corneae, etc
Evidence of existing atherosclerosis
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
15/45
Manifestations of Dyslipidemia
Eruptive xanthomata onthe forearm of a patientwith severe TGs
Xanthelasmasand tendonxanthomata in
patients with
severe LDL(the patient atthe bottom hasheterozygousfamilialhyperchol-esterolemia)
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
16/45
Diagnosis of AsymptomaticAtherosclerosis
To aid in risk stratificationRecommended: Physical examination
Ankle-Brachial IndexPossibly useful in patients already known to be atmoderate risk: Carotid ultrasonography
EKG Exercise stress testing in men >40 years old with
established cardiovascular risk factors
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
17/45
Risk Categories & Lipid Targets
More about LDL targets to come later for high-risk patients,these are minimum targets they should be lower if at all
possible
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
18/45
Lipid Targets: Triglycerides
No discrete triglyceride goal in eachcategory, but the optimal level is TG 10 requires targeted treatment to
prevent pancreatitis independent ofcardiovascular risk diet & lifestyle changes fibrate or niacin, fish oil
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
19/45
Factors Influencing Risk Assessment
Metabolic SyndromeAbdominal Obesity
Apolipoprotein B (apoB)Lipoprotein(a)Homocysteine
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Genetic Risk
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
20/45
Factors Influencing RiskAssessment
Presence of the Metabolic Syndrome: Risk A clustering of cardiovascular risk factors, including
abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and hypertension,
as well as lipid abnormalities ( TGs and HDL )
Presence of Abdominal Obesity: Risk with waist circumference as a useful estimate
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
21/45
Factors Influencing RiskAssessment
Apolipoprotein B (apoB) A poB (for the same lipid levels) = smaller,
denser, more atherogenic LDL particles ApoB levels correlate better than LDL
levels to clinical outcomes in statin trials For high risk patients, target apoB
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
22/45
Factors Influencing RiskAssessment
Homocysteine homocysteine levels predict adverse outcomes
in patients with CAD
Fixed-dose folate & B12 supplementation trialsso far have been negative
No evidence yet to screen for homocysteine
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
23/45
Factors Influencing RiskAssessment
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
CRP may add prognostic information to
Framingham CRP associated with abdominal obesity and
the metabolic syndrome May be useful in persons with a calculated 10-
year risk of 11-19% ( moderate risk) More aggressive Rx?
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
24/45
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
25/45
Factors Influencing RiskAssessment
Genetic Risk A confirmed, unambiguous family history of early
onset CAD increases the risk for first-degree relatives
(parents, siblings, children) RRI 1.7-2.0
Early onset is defined as
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
26/45
Selected Major Studies
There are many, many, many trials ofstatinsWe will discuss: MRC/HPS- largest trial of 2a. prevention (+ 1a.
prevention in high risk pt) ASCOT-LLA- largest trial of 1a. Prevention INTERHEART: largest study of risk factors
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
27/45
Selected Major Trials
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study: 20,556 men & women aged 40-80 with TC >3.5 All at high risk of CAD
Known CAD/MI/PVD/CVS DM, HTN, or both
RCT: Simvastatin 40mg vs. placebo Decreased death rate by 13% at 5 years
Decreased combined cardiovascular end points by 24% Benefits in all subgroups, including baseline LDL
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
28/45
Selected Major Trials
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial 9000 patients aged 40-79 with baseline TC
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
29/45
Selected Major Studies
The INTERHEART study Potentially modifiable risk factors associated
with MI in 52 countries:
Case Control: 15,152 cases & 14,820 controlsin 52 countries on every inhabited continent
Findings consistent between old/young,male/female, different countries
9 risk factors accounted for >90% of the risk (in men) >94% of the risk (in women)
Lancet 364(9437):4999-5014, 4 Sept 2004
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
30/45
The INTERHEART studyIncrease risk ApoB/ApoA1 ratio
OR 3.25
Smoking (current vs. never) OR 2.87
Psychosocial factors OR 2.67
DM OR 2.37
History of HTN OR 1.91
Abdominal Obesity OR 1.12 1 st vs. 3 nd tertile
OR 1.62 2nd
vs. 3rd
tertile
Protective: eating fruits &
vegetables daily OR 0.70
3 units/week ofalcohol
OR 0.91
moderate/strenuous
physical activity OR 0.86
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
31/45
Treatment
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
32/45
Treatment
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
33/45
Treatment
In low or moderate risk patients Start with lifestyle, progress to Rx based on targets
In high risk patients:
Start drug treatment immediately (statin), concurrentlywith diet and lifestyle modification Priority is to get LDL
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
34/45
2004 ATP III Update
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
35/45
Lower LDL Targets
In high risk patients mounting evidencesupports lower LDL-C targets
Latest CCS guidelines (CJC 2006): High risk patients: LDL-C < 2.0; TC:HDL
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
36/45
Treatment
If TC/HDL ratio is still high: Lifestyle modification Increasing Statin Dose (with LDL at target) Combination Drug Therapy
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
37/45
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
38/45
Treatment
Increasing Statin Dose (with LDL at target): For HDL and/or mild TGs (TGs
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
39/45
Treatment
Combination Drug Therapy (Limited if any evidence) : Moderate TGs -> add salmon oil (1-3g tid) to statin HDL -> combine statin with niacin. Caution:
1) niacin can cause increased insulin resistance 2) niacin-statin combination increases risk of hepatotoxicity
If intolerant to niacin: consider statin-fibrate combination
(simvastatin or pravastatin with fenofibrate, NOT gemfibrozil) lowest possible doses of each very close follow-up watching for hepatotoxicity and myositis if no CRF
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
40/45
Treatment
If TGs: Ideal target 6 despite lifestyle changes, need drug treatmenteven if the TC/HDL ratio is acceptable
Treatment is needed to avoid pancreatitis Options:
Fibrate NiacinSalmon oil
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
41/45
Follow-Up
Which blood work should be orderedin follow-up? How frequently?
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
42/45
Follow-Up
Lipids: 6 weeks after start / change of dose (levels reach steady
state within 6 weeks of start/change of medication) Long-term follow-up every 6-12 months
AST / ALT (0.5 3% incidence): Get baseline Use with caution if AST/ALT > 3 x normal At 12 weeks after initiation or change in dose (FDA)
CK (< 0.5% incidence): Get baseline Check only if symptomatic with myalgias (ATP III
guideline)
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
43/45
Case 1 Revisited
56 M Acute MI 4 months ago No current cardiovascular symptoms Tested for DM post-MI
Negative
Non-smoker, no HTN
Lipids measured while in hospital post-MI: TC 4.2, LDL 2.5, HDL 1.3, TG normal (TC/HDL 3.2)
What is his estimated risk of a cardiovascularevent in the next 10 years? Assumed to be 20%
How should you manage his lipids?
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
44/45
Case 2 Revisited
45 F Healthy, BP 125/80 Non-smoker, 3 units EtOH/week No cardiovascular symptoms
Lipids measured at annual visit: TC 6.5, LDL 4.1, HDL 1.4, TG normal (TC/HDL 4.6)
What is her estimated risk of a cardiovascular
event in the next 10 years? Calculated to be 1%
How should you manage her lipids?
8/12/2019 Dyslipidemia07
45/45
Case 3 Revisited
55 F DM Type 2 x 10 years (HbA1c 9.7%), HTN post menopausal, BMI 33 Non-smoker, 4 units EtOH/day No cardiovascular symptoms
Lipids measured at annual visit: TC 5.9, HDL 0.78, TG 9.8 (TC/HDL 7.6)
What is her estimated risk of a cardiovascularevent in the next 10 years? Assumed to be 20%
How should you manage her lipids?