Dynamical phase transition and prethermalization Sarang Goplalakrishnan,EugeneDemler(Harvard) Mobile magnetic impurity in Fermi superfluids PietroSmacchia,AlessandroSilva(SISSA,Trieste) Dima Abanin (PerimeterInstitute,Waterloo) MichaelKnap,EugeneDemler(Harvard)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Dynamical phase transitionand prethermalization
Sarang Goplalakrishnan, Eugene Demler (Harvard)
Mobile magnetic impurity in Fermi superfluids
Pietro Smacchia, Alessandro Silva (SISSA, Trieste)Dima Abanin (Perimeter Institute, Waterloo)Michael Knap, Eugene Demler (Harvard)
Dynamical phase transitionand prethermalization
Prethermalization
We observe irreversibility and approximate thermalization. At large time the system approaches stationary solution in the vicinity of, but not identical to, thermal equilibrium. The ensemble therefore retains some memory beyond the conserved total energy…This holds for interacting systems and in the large volume limit.
Prethermalization in ultracold atoms, theory: Eckstein et al. (2009); Moeckel et al. (2010), L. Mathey et al. (2010), R. Barnett et al.(2010)
Heavy ions collisionsQCD
Prethermalization in 1 dimensional systemProbing prethermolization in atomchip experiments
Initial T=120 nK (blue line). After 27.5 ms identical to thermal system at T= 15 nKAt all lengthscalesIn all correlation functions
Gring et al., Science (2012)
Quench and wait
Ultracold bosons in optical lattices
Quantum quench from Mott insulator to superfluid + wait:
We look at the long time limit of the system. What is the nature of the stationary state? Is it thermal?Does it become superfluid?Earlier work: Eckstein et al., PRL 103:056403 (2009)Schiro, Fabrizio, PRL 105: 076401 (2010)Sciola, Biroli, PRL 105:220401 (2010)Gambassi, Calabrese, EPL 95:66007 (2011)Sciola, Birolli, arXiv:1211.2572
Dynamical Phase transition
Experimental probes using quantum microscope Statistics of defects→ defect densi es and their higher moments (fluctuations, skewness,...)
local defects density d (lower case d):
global defects D (upper case D):
average moments cumulants
average moments cumulants (same as before)
Large‐N model Dynamical phase transition from Mott to Superfluid
→ at quan zed densi es O(2) field theory
large‐N limit: interaction factorizes
decoupled harmonic oscillators with time dependent mass (to be determined self‐consistently)
Large‐N model
Stationary point at long times can be found (without crossing the dynamical phase transition)
For d>2 there is a transition when r*=0
Critical properties of dynamical phase transition
Experimental signatures of dynamical phase transition
Use field theory to calculate the number of excitations in the basisof the Hamiltonian before the quench. This corresponds to the number of defects in the system
Average number of defects saturates at long wait times withor without crossing the DPT. Nothing special at the dynamicalphase transition. (Equilibration?)
The variance in the number of defects shows very different behavior before and after crossing the dynamical phase transition.
withoutcrossing DPT
aftercrossing DPT
Defect counting in O(N) model model reduces to a set of harmonic oscillators with time dependent masses
initial state has no defects: ground state of quench the mass of the oscillators→ wave func on is squeezed state
from we calculate
density: fluctuations:
Defect counting in O(N) model
Individual moments
Moment generating function
PrethermalizationDivergence in the variance of the number of defects demonstratesprethermalization (introduced by Wetterich et al. , see e.g. hep-th/0403234).The system has anomalous occupation of the low energy modes
Ratio of the cumulants
C1/C2
C2/C3
Dynamical phase transition at r*=0 'Mott'
Prethermalization
Precursors ofhigher moments divergingat DPT
local defects: C1 C2
Is this prethermalization real?
exact dynamics in 1D with DMRG
Defect statistics
Steady state
cumulants of global defects D (as in field theory)
→ approach quickly the thermal value
Steady state
cumulants of local defects
→ approach quickly the thermal value (~ 2‐3 1/J2times)
Open questions Does a prethermalized regime exist in higher dimension? this is hard (impossible?) to answer theoretically experimental study would give insight in the validity of O(N) for dynamics of bosons
thermal values can be easily obtained by QMC in higher dimension
1D: O(N) and DMRG give even qualitative difference for cumulant ratio:
Mott Mott
Open questions
Does a prethermalized regime exist in higher dimension? this is difficult (impossible?) to answer theoretically experimental study would give insight in the validity of O(N)
for dynamics of bosons thermal values can be easily obtained by QMC in higher
dimension
1D: agreement improves when going to larger filling (particle‐hole symmetry)
Mott
Mott
slight decrease?
Mobile magnetic impurities in Fermi superfluids
Impurities in solid state systems
Bound states on magnetic impurities in superconductors
Bound states on magnetic impurities in superconductorsYu, Acta Phys. Sin. 21, 75 (1965)Shiba, Prof. Theor. Phys. 40, 435 (1968).Rusinov, Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 9, 85 (1969)