Top Banner
Drought! Bill Patzert [email protected] 26 February 2014 How Long Will this Drought Last? Let’s Look at the Data!
41

Drought! Bill Patzert [email protected] 26 February 2014.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Elijah Floyd
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Drought!

Bill [email protected]

26 February 2014

How Long Will this Drought Last?Let’s Look at the Data!

Page 2: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 3: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 4: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

January 18, 2013 January 18, 2014

Page 5: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Record Drought in 2013-2014• L.A. (CA) Calendar Year 2013

- Jan – Dec = 3.60” - Driest in 135 yrs

• CA Water/Snow Year 2013 – 2014 - L.A. = 1.20” (~12% of norm, 10.72”)

• Most of West in 3+ year drought

• Drought started in 1999? - 11 of last 15 years below normal

Page 6: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

L.A. Resident,

MWD Customer

Page 7: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Strongly Modulates:• Precipitation/Snow• Water Supply• Global Temperature• Land & Ocean Ecosystems

Why? Pacific DecadalOscillation & Drought

Page 8: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

The Pacific Decadal OscillationSea Surface Temperature Pattern

Warms Pacific (Earth) Cools Pacific (Earth)

Page 9: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 10: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

• No Trend!

• Highly variable

- 38.32” wettest yr (2006–2007)

- 3.21” driest yr (2004–2005)

- 11 of past 16 yrs below ‘normal’

• Strongly Modulated by:

- ‘Events’ (Atmospheric River, 30-70%)

- Interannual (El Niño, La Niña & La Nada)

- Decadal (Pacific Decadal Oscillation)

California Precipitation

Page 11: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

December 2010 ‘Atmospheric River’ Event

Heavy Winter Rains (50% Annual Rain)13 Wet, Cold Days last two weeks of December

‘10 14.40”at JPL (2.86” normal)

Accounts for 30 to 70% Of Our Rain & Snow!

Page 12: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

18

78

18

81

18

84

18

87

18

90

18

93

18

96

18

99

19

02

19

05

19

08

19

11

19

14

19

17

19

20

19

23

19

26

19

29

19

32

19

35

19

38

19

41

19

44

19

47

19

50

19

53

19

56

19

59

19

62

19

65

19

68

19

71

19

74

19

77

19

80

19

83

19

86

19

89

19

92

19

95

19

98

20

01

20

04

20

07

20

10

20

13

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

SEASONAL RAINFALL

Linear (SEASONAL RAINFALL)

10 Year Mean

Year

Inc

he

s

LA Downtown (USC) Annual Rain (12 month total ending June

30th of the year indicated)

38.18"'84

'90

'93

'41

'52'69

'78

'83

'93

'98

'14'58 '66 '73

'86

'92

'95

Data: NOAA NWS(Los Angeles/Oxnard)

'26

Major El Nino's years are indicated

'02

'61'99 Rainfall Rollercoaster!

38.32" '05

3.21" '07

Page 13: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 460

5

10

15

20

25

Frequency of total rainFrequency of El NinoFrequency of La Nina

Fre

qu

ency

Average of all years: 15.1 inchesAverage of El Nino years: 20.7 inchesAverage of La Nina years: 12.5 inches

Los Angeles Annual Rainfall (1878-2009)Relationship to ENSO

Rain (inches)

Page 14: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Ocean-driven Drought?

Page 15: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

El NiñoPositive PDO

La NiñaNegative PDO

Page 16: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Winter 2013–2014 Jet Stream Pattern

Page 17: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Orl

ea

ns

(5

1.9

", 1

31

8m

m)

Sc

oti

a (

47

.3",

12

02

mm

)

Uk

iah

(3

7.2

", 9

45

mm

)

Gra

ton

(4

0.8

", 1

03

7m

m)

Sa

nta

Ro

sa

(2

9.9

",7

60

mm

)

Na

pa

(2

5.2

", 6

39

mm

)

Sa

cra

me

nto

(1

8.3

", 4

64

mm

)

Co

alin

ga

(7

.6",

19

1m

m)

Lo

s B

an

os

(9

.1",

23

0m

m)

Ha

nfo

rd (

8.1

", 2

07

mm

)

Alt

ad

en

a (

20

.2",

51

4m

m)

Lo

s A

ng

ele

s (

15

.0",

38

0m

m)

Sa

nta

An

a (

13

.5",

34

4m

m)

Sa

n D

ieg

o (

10

.1",

25

6m

m)

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Pe

rce

nt

Ch

an

ge

(%

)California Rainfall ‘No’ Trends

1925-2007From NoCal (left) to SoCal (right)

Page 18: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

187818961914193219501968198620040

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

f(x) = 2.47599792431961 x + 4453.84228980321R² = 0.00332183187670054

Sacramento

To

tal A

nn

ua

l Ra

infa

ll (m

m)

1878 1896 1914 1932 1950 1968 1986 20040

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

f(x) = − 1.12954714662207 x + 3858.23364579605R² = 0.000563542652161075

Los Angeles

To

tal A

nn

ua

l Ra

infa

ll (m

m)

Sacramento & Los Angeles Rainfall (1878 – 2004)(Yearly, 10 Year Running Mean & Trend)

If trend is 2.5 cm (1”)/century and

variability

is similar, trend is significant in ~270

years!

Page 19: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Colorado River

Page 20: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

190519061907190819091910191119121913191419151916191719181919192019211922192319241925192619271928192919301931193219331934193519361937193819391940194119421943194419451946194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020110.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Colorado River at Lees Ferry, AZAnnual Natural Flow in MAF (1905 -

2013)10-yr Average

Calendar YearProvisional data, subject to change Estimated values for 2011-2013

Co

lora

do

Riv

er

An

nu

al F

low

(M

AF

)

Page 21: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Positive PDO - 1983

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation

Negative PDO - 2014

Page 22: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Anasazi disperse

Page 23: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Megadroughts

Page 24: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 25: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Global Temperature

• Global is Warming (Trend is 0.012°F/yr.)

- CO2 increased from 280 to 400 ppm

• Strongly Modulated by:

- ‘Events’ (Weather)

- Interannual (El Niño, La Niña & La

Nada)

- Decadal (Pacific Decadal Oscillation)

- PDO Phase Shift causes ‘GW Hiatus’

or

‘GW Acceleration’

Page 26: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

0.012°F/yr.

-PDO -PDO+PDO

Page 27: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Global Annual Temperature Anomalies vs 1951–1980 Average (°C)*

ENSO Modulates Global Temps

*NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)

Page 28: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Negative PDO = Hiatus Positive PDO =Rapid Increase

Negative PDO =Recent Hiatus

Global Temperature Anomalies since 1950Pacific Decadal Oscillation Modulates Global Temperatures

Page 29: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Strongly Modulates:• Precipitation/Snow• Water Supply• Global Temperatures• Lots of Other Stuff

Why Drought?Pacific Decadal Oscillation

When Does Drounght End?

Page 30: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

September 21, 2002

Page 31: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 32: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Since 2005, 250 billion gallons H2O

used in 80,000 wells in 17 States!

Fracking = H2O

Page 33: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

6X 4X 2X

CA Population ExplosionStresses Everything!

Page 34: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

L.A.-2010

L.A.-1902

It’s us!

Page 35: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

• (Naturally) Varying Climate• Global Warming Accelerating• Environment Stressed Out• Expanding Agricultural Demands• Growing Urban Population• Changing Economy• Technology Explosion• New Users (Frackers)

Managing Waterin Semi-Arid CA

Page 36: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Our water management policy is tailored for more wet years than dry years.

The reality is just the opposite.

Even when nature behaves, there are too many water demands

to satisfy all of them.

This drought is a great opportunity to start a real conversation about fundamental changes

in California water policy

Page 37: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 38: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

Ignoring Reality = Dire Consequences

• Politicians• Lawyers

What’s your worst nightmare?

Page 39: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.

The Great Flood of 1938

76th Anniversary

February 27 – March 4, 1938

~10.0” of Rain

Page 40: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.
Page 41: Drought! Bill Patzert wpatzert@jpl.nasa.gov 26 February 2014.