Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing Condition ... · 365 days, (ii) that effort was made by local bodies/state government/households during last 365 days to tackle problem

Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene

and Housing Condition

in Odisha

(District Level Results)

Based on State and Central Sample

Pooled data of

NSS 69th Round

Survey period: July 2012 –December 2012

DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS ODISHA

DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS ODISHA

Drinking Water, Sanitation,

Hygiene and Housing Condition in

Odisha

(District Level Results)

Based on State and Central Sample

Pooled data of

NSS 69th Round

Survey period: July 2012 –December 2012

The main objective of this pooling report of 69th round, NSS is to obtain sub-state level (Regional

level and District level) estimates on different aspects of “Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing

condition” of Odisha. The objective of the survey on ‘Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing

condition’ was to examine and study different aspects of living conditions necessary for decent and healthy

living of the household members such as type of dwelling unit, drinking water, sanitation, hygiene etc.. On

drinking water, important information was collected on (i) sources and sufficiency of drinking water (ii)

quality of drinking water. On the sanitation facilities, information was collected on (i) access to latrine, in

terms of exclusive use, common use or no access, (ii) type of latrine, (iii) reason for not using latrine despite

having access. On the characteristics of the house and dwelling unit, important indicators that have been

developed are (i) Structure type of dwelling unit (ii) Tenure type of dwelling, (iii) proportion of households

having electricity for domestic use (iv) Hygiene etc.

PREFACE

NSSO conducted nation-wide survey on ‘Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and

Housing condition’ and survey on ‘Particulars of slums’ in its 69th round (July 2012-December 2012)

.DES Odisha also had participated in the 69th round survey. One of the prime objectives behind

collection of data by the DES was that the two data sets, one collected by NSSO and another collected

by DES, may be pooled together to get a better reliable estimates and benefit will be derived in the

case of estimates at sub-state level like regions / districts. The present report on ‘District Level Result

on Drinking Water & Sanitation facilities and Housing condition in Odisha’ presents the pooled results

of both central and state samples data of NSS 69th round.

This report provides data on the household about (i) access to the principal source of drinking

water in Odisha (ii) nature of access to the principal source of drinking water and (iii) Households with

bathroom and without bathroom facility. On the sanitation facilities, data was collected on (i) access to

latrine, in terms of exclusive use, common use or no access, (ii) type of latrine and on housing conditions

data was collected on (i) structure of dwelling unit (ii) ventilation to the house etc.

I am thankful to NSSO, Government of India for their continuous technical guidance to DES

Odisha regarding estimation and pooling technique.

The supervisors, field staff and staffs of NSS Division who worked hard to make the survey a

success deserve special appreciation. The efforts put in by the officers and staff in bringing out this

publication are also acknowledged with thanks.

Comments and Valuable Suggestions from the researchers and scholars for improvement of its

content and coverage will be highly appreciated.

Sri Dushasan Behera

Director

Sri Dushasan Behera, Director,

Economics & Statistics,

Government of Odisha’

Bhubaneswar, 751001,

E-mail: [email protected]

Bhubaneswar

28.11.2017

Planning & Convergence Department has constituted a “Technical

Expert Committee” for finalisation of NSS reports relating to state

sample and pooled sample. Members of Technical Expert Committee: 1. Deputy Director General, (FOD), NSSO, Bhubaneswar.

2. Director, Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies,

Bhubaneswar.

3. One Professor from P.G. Department of Statistics, Utkal University, Vanivihar,

Bhubaneswar.

4. Representative from XIMB, Bhubaneswar.

5. Expert, Poverty & Human Development Monitoring Agency (PHDMA), P&C

Department.

6. Director, Regional Institute of Planning and Applied Statistics (RIPAES),

Bhubaneswar.

Director, DES, Odisha is the chairman of the committee.

Detail Involvement

From Data Collection to Report Preparation

1. Field work: State sample data collection by district level Primary workers and

Supervisors.

2. Data Entry and Validation (state sample): Staff of NSS Division, DE&S,

Odisha.

3. Data entry software: Own Software developed by DES on the base of CSPro

and later converted to DPD layout and format by AD of NSS Division, DES.

4. Estimation, Tabulation (using software and guidelines provided by NSSO,

Government of India) and report writing:

1. Dr. Sujata Priyambada Parida, Assistant Director.

2. Sri Rashmi Ranjan Kanungo, Statistical Assistant.

3. Mrs. Indira Garnaik, Statistical Assistant.

5. Report Verification: All Officers of NSS Division, Internal committee of DES

and Director of DES, Odisha.

6. Final Approval: Members of Technical Expert Committee.

CONTENT

Page no

List of Tables i -iii

List of figures iii-iv

Executive Summary v-ix

Chapter-One Introduction 1-7

Chapter-Two Sample Design, Concept and Definition 8-21

Chapter-Three Testing Poolability & Methodology Of Pooling 22-31

Chapter-Four Drinking Water & Sanitation Facilities 32-65

Chapter-Five Housing Condition 66-84

Chapter-Six Relative Standard Error (RSE)

85-91

Chapter-7 Conclusion 92-96

Appendix-A Estimation Procedure 97-108

Appendix-B Annexure Tables (MR method) 109-178

Appendix-C Annexure Tables (IV method) 179-184

Appendix-D Schedules 0.0 & 1.2 185-206

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha i

LIST OF TABLES

Sl. No

Table No

Title

1 2 3

Chapter-Two

1 2.1 Number of first stage units (FSUs) allotted, surveyed and number of sample households surveyed.

2 2.2 District wise number of fsu (villages/blocks) surveyed for Schedule 1.2: NSS 69th round ( Odisha )

3 2.3 District wise number of households surveyed for Schedule 1.2: NSS 69th round, (Odisha)

4 2.4 RSE (%) on estimated no of households for central, state and pooled samples

Chapter-Three

5 3.1 District wise result of chi-square test on access to bathroom for pooled sample. χ20.01= 9.

21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

6 3.2 District wise result of chi-square test on access to drinking water for pooled sample. χ20.01=

9. 21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

7 3.3 District wise result of chi-square test on access to latrine for pooled sample. χ20.01= 9. 21

df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

8 3.4 District wise result of chi-square test on structure of house for pooled sample. χ20.01= 9. 21

df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

9 3.5 District wise result of run test for per capita floor area (Z 0.01 = - 2.33 [one sided est])

10 3.6 District wise results by parametric Z test of average floor area for pooled sample with Z=2.575

Chapter- Four

11 4.1 Percentage of households having ‘sufficient’ drinking water (principal source) throughout the year

12 4.2 Percentage distribution of households according to Quality of Drinking water from (principal source) in Odisha during the year 2012.

13 4.3 Sector wise per thousand distribution of households according to various Method of treatment of drinking water.

14 4.4 Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in Odisha

15 4.5 Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water for each region of Odisha

16 4.6R Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in rural Odisha

17 4.6U Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in urban Odisha

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha ii

18 4.6R+U Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in (rural + urban )Odisha

19 4.7R Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of drinking water (Rural Odisha)

20 4.7U Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of drinking water (Urban Odisha)

21 4.7R+U Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of drinking water (Rural + Urban Odisha)

22 4.8 Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom

23 4.9 Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom

24 4. 10 Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in Odisha

25 4.11 Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine

26 4.12 Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine but not using it by reason for not using latrine

27 4.13 Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine

28 4.14 Households (per thousand) having facility of exclusive access to latrine

29 4.15R Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in rural Odisha

30 4.15U Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in Urban Odisha

31 4.15R+U

Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in Odisha

Chapter-Five

32 5.1 Average Household size and Average floor area of the dwelling

33 5.2 Sector wise per 1000 distribution of households with type of structure in Odisha according to centre, State and pooled result.

34 5.3 Per 1000 distribution of households by condition of structure for different structure types

35 5.4 Sector wise per 1000 distribution of households according to tenurial status of the dwelling in Odisha.

36 5.5 Per 1000 households with type of ventilation of the dwelling units for different structure types in Odisha during 2012.

37 5.6 Proportion (per 1000) of households reporting (i) problem of flies/mosquitoes during last 365 days, (ii) that effort was made by local bodies/state government/households during last 365 days to tackle problem of flies/mosquitoes

38 5.7 Region wise per thousand distribution by structure type and average floor area for household

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha iii

39 5.8 District wise percentage distribution of households according to type of structure in rural Odisha.

40 5.9 District wise percentage distribution of households according to type of structure in Urban Odisha

41 5. 10 Per 1000 distribution of households according to Tenurial Status of Dwelling in Rural Odisha.

42 5. 11 Per 1000 distribution of households according to Tenurial Status of Dwelling in Urban Odisha.

43 5.12 District wise average floor area in 0.00 (sq. Mt.)

Chapter-Six

44 6.1 District wise relative standard error on no bathroom facility for state, central and pooled samples

45 6.2 Relative Standard Error (RSE) in% of average floor area for dwelling unit

46 6.3 Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % of dwelling type

LIST OF FIGURES

Chapter-Four

1 4.1 Percentage of households reported defective quality of drinking water from principal source

2 4.2 Percentage of households treating drinking water in Odisha

3 4.3 Percentage of households who had exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water in 2012

4 4.4 Percentage of households who had exclusive access to the principal source of drinking water for each region

5 4.5 Percentage distribution of households without bathroom during 2012

6 4.6 Sector wise percentage of households without bathroom during 2012 in India and Odisha

7 4.7 Percentage of households without bathroom facility for different regions of Odisha

8 4.8R Access to bathroom (rural Odisha)

9 4.8U Access to bathroom (urban Odisha)

10 4.8R+U Access to bathroom facility in rural + urban Odisha

11 4.9 Percentage of households without latrine during 2012

12 4. 10 Percentage distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine

13 4.11 Percentage of households having access to latrine but not using it

14 4.12 Sector wise percentage of households without latrine during 2012 in India and Odisha

15 4.13R District level Latrine facilities in rural Odisha

16 4.13U District level Latrine facilities in urban Odisha

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha iv

Chapter-Five

17 5.1 Percentage of households having electricity for domestic use in Odisha

18 5.2 Region wise percentage distribution of households according to type of structure and average floor area in Rural Odisha

19 5.3 Region wise percentage distribution of households according to type of structure and average floor area in Urban Odisha

20 5.4 percentage distribution of households according to structure type in rural Odisha based on pooled result

21 5.5 Percentage distribution of households according to structure type in urban Odisha based on pooled result

22 5.6 Percentage Distribution of Households according to Tenural Status in Rural Odisha Based on Pooled Result

23 5.7 Percentage Distribution of Households according to Tenural Status in Urban Odisha Based on Pooled Result.

24 5.8 District wise Average Floor Area of the Dwelling Unit in Rural Odisha

25 5.9 District wise Average Floor Area of the Dwelling Unit in Urban Odisha

Chapter-Six

26 6.1R District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no bathroom in Rural Odisha

27 6.1U District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no bathroom in Urban Odisha

28 6.2R District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no latrine in Rural Odisha

29 6.2U District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no latrine in Urban Odisha

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha v

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) conducted a nation-wide survey on

‘Housing Condition, Drinking water, Sanitation and Hygiene’ in its 69th round (July 2012-

December 2012) of operations. As is usual in the regular NSS rounds, DE&S Odisha,

participated in the survey on matching sample basis. The sample surveyed by DE&S is called

as state sample. Another independent sample of equal size surveyed by NSSO is called as

‘Central sample’. All the results of the present report have been analysed in this report after

pooling these two samples using scientific technique. The main objective of this pooling report

is to obtain sub-state level (Regional level and District level) estimates on different aspects of

“Housing Condition, Drinking water, Sanitation and Hygiene” of Odisha. Also the state level

result is of more reliability because of enhancing sample size by pooling.

The survey covered both rural and urban sectors of Odisha. A stratified multi-stage

design had been adopted for the 69th round survey. The first stage units (FSUs) were the census

villages in the rural sector and Urban Frame Survey (UFS) blocks in the urban sector. The

ultimate stage units were households in both the sectors. In case of large FSUs, one

intermediate stage of sampling was the selection of two hamlet-groups (hg)/ sub-blocks (sb)

from each rural/urban FSU. The schedule of enquiry on ‘Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene

and Housing Condition’ (known as Schedule 1.2) was designed to collect information on

housing condition with special emphasis on the aspects of drinking water, sanitation and

hygiene. The present report shows the state, region and district level estimates based on the

data collected on the aspects of ‘Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing Condition”

For rural Odisha, the number of villages surveyed in the state sample was 2111 and the

number of urban blocks surveyed was 88. For rural Odisha, the number of villages surveyed in

the central sample was 212 and the number of urban blocks surveyed was 88.Hence all the

estimates presented in this report based on pooled data are derived from 423 sample villages

and 176 urban blocks covering 5020 in rural households and 2112 urban households of Odisha.

The results have been summarised as follows.

1 One sample village of Malkangiri was treated as causality.

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha vi

16.1 percent households in Odisha had exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water.

(Rural -11.8% and Urban- 38.4%).

69.3 percent households in Odisha had community2 use of their principal source of

drinking water. (Rural -76.2% and Urban- 33.4%).

83.4 percent households in Odisha had protected (safe) principal source of drinking

water. (Rural-81.5% and Urban-94.9%).

In Coastal region 25.6%, Northern region 13.6% and Southern-8.2%of households

are having exclusive accesses to the principal source of drinking water

(Coastal_Rural-21.9%, Coastal_Urban-40.2%) (Northern_Rural-9.1%

Northern_Urban-34.8%) and Southern_Rural-4.4% Southern_Urban-39.9%).

Among 30 districts the top three districts are Khurda (44.3%), Jagatsinghpur

(39.2%) and Balasore (30.5%) of households having exclusive accesses to their

respective principal source of drinking water.

Among 30 districts the bottom three districts are Nayagarh (0.3%), Balangir (1%)

and Deogarh (1.6%) of households having exclusive accesses to their respective

principal source of drinking water.

In case of community use of principal source of drinking water, among 30 districts

of Odisha, Khurda (26.9%), Jagatsinghpur (41%) and Jajpur (49.2%) had the lowest

and Deogarh (96.7%), Balangir (96.6%) and Nabarangpur (96.4%) had the highest

proportion of households.

2 Common use of drinking water (by a community/ group of households) from a source created with public/ private

fund.

Drinking water Facility

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha vii

9.3 percent households of Odisha are having attached bathroom (Rural-3.2% and

Urban-41%).

79.4% of households of Odisha did not have any bathroom. (Rural-88.5% and

Urban- 31.9%).

Percentage of households for rural Odisha having attached bathroom for three

regions are (Coastal-5.1%, Northern-3.4% and Southern-1.2%).

Percentage of households for urban Odisha having attached bathroom for three

regions are (Northern-45.3% and Southern-44.6% and Coastal- 36 %).

Percentage of households for Odisha (Rural+Urban) having attached bathroom for

three regions are (Coastal-11.3%, Northern-10.7% and Southern-5.9%).

Region wise percentage of households without bathroom for rural Odisha

(Northern- 92.2%, Southern-90% and Coastal-83.7%).

Region wise percentage of households without bathroom for urban Odisha

(Northern-33.8%, Coastal-32.7% and Southern-27.4%).

Region wise percentage of households without bathroom for Odisha (Southern-

83.3%, Northern-82% and Coastal-73.4%).

In Odisha, Keonjhar (0.8%), Deogarh (0.9%) and Subarnapur (1.3%), had the

lowest while Jharsuguda (28.8%), Khurda (26.4%), Sambalpur (19.8%) had the

highest proportion of households with attached bathroom.

In Odisha, Deogarh (98.6 percent), Subarnapur (95.8 percent), Nabarangpur (95.8

percent) had the highest and Khurda (37.6 percent), Jharsuguda (61.1 percent),

Cuttack (61.5 percent), had the lowest proportion of households without any

bathroom.

71 percent households of Odisha had no latrine facilities. (Rural- 81% and Urban-

20.1%).

In rural Odisha 80.1% households, who have access to latrine facility used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine.

Bathroom Facility

Latrine Facilities

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha viii

In urban Odisha 95.7% households who have access to latrine facility used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine.

In the combined sector of Odisha 86.7% households who have access to latrine facility

used piped sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine

Region wise percentage of households without latrine facilities for rural Odisha

(Southern-84.3%, Northern-83.6% and Coastal-75.3%).

Region wise percentage of households without latrine facilities for urban Odisha

(Northern-26.7%, Coastal-17.5% and Southern-15.7%).

Region wise percentage of households without latrine facilities in Odisha (Southern-

76.8%, Northern-73.7% and Coastal-63.7%).

In Odisha, Malkangiri (92.9 percent), Nabarangpur (92.4 percent) and Kandhamal (92

percent) had the highest proportion of households that had no latrine facilities .Khurda

(31.9 percent), Cuttack (53.1percent) and Angul (57.9 percent) had the lowest

proportion of households having no latrine facilities.

Average floor area of the dwelling unit for urban households was 43.58 square metre, for rural

households it was 34.62 square metre and for all Odisha it was 36.07 square metre respectively.

In Rural Odisha 34.4 percent households used to live in a house with katcha structure,

whereas in urban only 7.6 percent households lived in katcha structure.

In rural Odisha 65.6 percent households lived in a house either pucca or semi-pucca

type structure, for urban Odisha it was 92.4 percent, according to pooled result.

According to pooled result 51.1 percent rural households and 66.5 urban households

with ‘katcha’ structure type had lived in a house with ‘bad’ condition, in Odisha during

2012.

Very negligible 4.4 percent rural households and 2.4 percent urban households with

“Pucca” structure lived in a house with ‘bad’ condition.

94.7 percent rural households and 54.5 percent urban households had lived in ‘Own’

dwelling unit.

Housing condition

District level result on Drinking Water , Sanitation ,hygiene and Housing condition in Odisha ix

41.3 percent urban households had lived in ‘Hired’ dwelling unit, whereas in case of

rural it was 3.2 percent only.

At all Odisha level 88.2 percent households had lived in ‘Own’ dwelling unit and only

9.2 percent households had lived in ‘Hired’ dwelling unit.

2.2 percent in rural Odisha and 4.2 percent in urban Odisha, households had lived in

dwelling unit as ‘Others’

34.9 percent rural households and 27.1 percent urban households had lived in a house

with katcha type of structure having either good or satisfactory ventilation in the

dwelling unit.

In rural and urban Odisha ventilation of dwelling unit gradually worsen from structure

type pucca to semi-pucca & katcha.

39.2 percent households in Odisha had lived with ‘bad’ ventilation in their dwelling

unit considering all structure type.

District Level Result on Drinking Water , Sanitation, hygiene and housing condition in Odisha 1

Chapter One

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), Odisha has participated in socio-

economic survey on ‘Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing condition’ in 69th

round NSS (National sample Survey) during July 2012 to December 2012 guided by NSSO,

Govt of India. The sample surveyed by DE&S is called as state sample. The independent

sample of equal size surveyed by NSSO is called as ‘Central sample’. The state sample report

has already been published by DES, Odisha during November 2015. The main objective of this

pooling report is to obtain sub-state level (Regional level and District level) estimates on

different aspects of “Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing condition” of Odisha.

1.1.1 Background of pooling

The National Sample Survey provides data on different socio economic issues which

are being used for planning and policy decisions. But the NSSO or the State DES does not

release sub-state level estimates mainly due to inadequate sample size as such estimates are

subject to less reliability. The development policies of Government and other agencies are now

focused on the district level planning. The demands for district level estimates are increasing

day by day. Now the two data sets, one collected by NSSO and another collected by DES has

been pooled together to get a better reliable estimates and benefit has been derived at sub-state

level like regions / districts. Therefore, pooling of central and state sample data may be

considered as one way of tackling the problem of inadequate sample size for arriving at district

level estimates.

All the results of the present report have been analysed in this report after pooling these

two samples using scientific technique.


1.1.2 Committee on Pooling

Keeping in view the growing demand, National Statistical Commission (NSC) constituted a

committee on Pooling of Central and State sample data of NSS under the Chairmanship of Prof.

R. Radhakrishna. Vide order no. 8(64)/2010-NSC, 30th July, 2010.To examine various aspects

of the pooling, four sub-groups were formed. Process related issues, timeliness of processing

and timeframe for pooling, parameters need to be pooled were examined by the sub-group

headed by Prof. D. Coondoo, along with the members Shri J. Poddar and representative

members of the State Directorate of Economics and Statistics(DES). The sub-group headed by

Dr Rajiv Mehta along with Dr G. M Boopathi dealt the matter relating to generating weighting

diagrams from the pooled data at sub-state level for the purpose of construction of consumer

price indices.

The terms of reference of the committee are as follows:-

Conditions to be fulfilled for pooling of Central and State Sample NSS data.

Methodology for pooling.

Time frame by which the exercise needs to be completed by each State.

Generating weighting diagrams from the pooled data at sub-state level for the purpose

of consumer price indices (Rural and Urban) including occupation specific indices

such as CPIAL, CPIIW etc., from the NSS data on consumer expenditure surveys

(quinquennial & thin sample) .

Identification of District level parameters.

1.1.3 The Commission’s recommendation: “The State sample data should be

processed regularly within a reasonable time after the completion of fieldwork and attempts

should be made to obtain and utilize pooled estimates by combining central and state samples”.

1.1.4 Workshop for 69th round pooling: For 69th round there was another workshop

organised by DPD for state DES on 27.02.2017 and 28.02.2017 at Sardar Patel Bhawan, New

Delhi which was chaired by Dr G.C Manna, Director General of NSSO. Thirty one different

states had participated in the workshop. DES, Odisha had participated in this workshop. The


software developed by DPD, NSSO was common for all states only supports the data in DPD

layout. As DES Odisha had used its own software and own layout for data entry in 69th round

the data had been reformatted to DPD format before participating the workshop which was a

long term exercise. The state sample data of Odisha has been converted to DPD format in all

respect and the poolability test and pooling exercise has been completed by the end of February,

2017.

1.2 Objective of 69th round survey

Housing is a basic requirement of human well-being. Along with the requirement of

shelter, other facilities in the micro environment of housing such as type of dwelling unit,

drinking water, sanitation, hygiene, etc., form vital components of overall quality of life of the

population. The objective of the survey on ‘Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing

condition’ was to examine and study different aspects of living conditions necessary for decent

and healthy living of the household members by developing suitable indicators based upon

collected information.

Information on the aspects outlined in the previous paragraph was related to the

household as a whole. On drinking water, important information was collected on (i) sources

and sufficiency of drinking water, (ii) distance to the principal source of drinking water and

(iii) quality of drinking water. On the sanitation facilities, information was collected on (i)

access to latrine, in terms of exclusive use, common use or no access, (ii) type of latrine, (iii)

reason for not using latrine despite having access. Using the collected information, important

indicators of living facilities have been developed and presented in this report. Some of the

important indicators are: proportion of households (i) using improved sources of drinking

water, (ii) getting sufficient drinking water, (iii) fetching drinking water from outside the

premises, (iv) using improved latrine facilities, (v) having no arrangement for garbage disposal,

(vi) having drainage arrangement. On the characteristics of the house and dwelling unit,

important indicators that have been developed are (i) proportion of households with secure

tenure status of dwelling, (ii) proportion of households having electricity for domestic use etc.


1.3 Past surveys on the subject

To assess housing condition of the households, living facilities available to them, and

other related aspects, the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) has been collecting data on

‘Housing Conditions and Other Amenities’ almost since its inception. Data on the structural

aspects of dwelling units and availability of basic housing amenities such as drinking water,

bathroom, sewerage, latrine, lighting, etc., were collected intermittently since the 7th round

(October 1953-March 1954). These surveys were essentially exploratory in nature, designed to

give a broad idea about the dimensions of housing conditions at the national level. Thereafter,

two comprehensive surveys on housing condition were carried out in the 28th round (October

1973-June 1974) and in the 44th round (July 1988-June 1989).

The NSSO, in its 49th round (January - June 1993) of operation, took up 'Housing

condition' again as a subject of enquiry. After a gap of nearly ten years, the fourth survey in the

series was conducted in the 58th round (July–December 2002). In this round also, information

was collected on the structural aspects of the dwelling units and enquiries had been made

whether the basic housing amenities such as drinking water, bath room, sewerage, latrine,

lighting, etc. were available to households or not. Information on construction activities carried

out by the households during the last five years was also collected. The latest available data on

housing condition is the data corresponding to NSS 65th round (July 2008-June 2009) in which

a nation-wide survey was carried out to provide estimates on various characteristics of housing

amenities, housing condition, cost of construction, etc.

But only state level estimates have been obtained in these previous rounds as pooling

technique has been adopted from NSS 66th round onwards. So this is first report on Housing

Condition, Drinking water, Sanitation and Hygiene showing the result at district level.

1.4 The survey outline

1.4.1 Schedules of enquiry

The schedules of enquiry on ‘Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing

Condition’ (known as Schedule 1.2) was designed to collect information on housing condition

with wider coverage on the aspects of drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. The codes for

collecting information on drinking water and sanitation facilities had been restructured to suit


the data requirements of corresponding Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). For the

households, whose principal source of drinking water was outside the premises etc. Questions

were also added on some other characteristics of drinking water such as quality of drinking

water from the principal source. On the aspects of latrine facility, some additional information

was also collected. For example, the reason for not using latrine was collected for the

households which have access to the latrine facilities but are not using it. Some questions were

added for the first time regarding the problem of flies and mosquitoes faced by the households

during the reference period. The impact of hygiene on health was also considered by collecting

some information on whether any of the household member(s) has suffered from specified

types of illness during last 30 days.

1.4.2 Survey outline of NSS 69th round

The survey covered the whole rural and urban sector of Odisha on sample basis.

1.4.3 Sampling design

A stratified multi-stage design had been adopted for the 69th round survey. The first

stage units (FSU) were the census villages in the rural sector and Urban Frame Survey (UFS)

blocks in the urban sector. The ultimate stage units (USU) were households in both the

sectors. In case of large FSUs, one intermediate stage of sampling was the selection of two

hamlet-groups (hgs)/ sub-blocks (sbs) from each rural/ urban FSU.

For the rural sector, the list of 2001 census villages updated by excluding the villages

urbanised and including the towns de-urbanised after 2001 census constituted the sampling

frame. For the urban sector, the latest updated list of UFS blocks (2007-12) was used as the

sampling frame.

Within each district of a State, generally speaking, two basic strata were formed: (i)

rural stratum comprising all rural areas of the district and (ii) urban stratum comprising all

the urban areas of the district. However, within the urban areas of a district, if there were

one or more towns with population 10 lakhs or more as per population census 2011 in a

district, each of them formed a separate basic stratum and the remaining urban areas of the

district were considered as another basic stratum.

First-stage units: As is usual in the regular NSS rounds, most States and Union Territories


participated in the survey in the form of surveying samples earmarked as ‘State sample’ by

their officials in addition to the ‘Central sample’ surveyed by NSSO. For rural Odisha, the

number of households surveyed in the State sample was 2532 and for the central sample it

was 2488.The number of urban households surveyed for both state and central samples was

1056. This report is based on the estimates obtained from the State and Central samples pooled

data.

Second-stage units: For this particular survey, from each sample village and urban block,

12 households were selected for canvassing Schedule 1.2.

Sub-round: The survey was conducted for six months (1st July 2012 to 31st December 2012).

The whole period of six months was divided into two sub-rounds (sub-round one and two),

each with three months’ duration. The sub-round one consisted of the period ‘July -

September 2012’ whereas the other sub-round spread over ‘October - December 2012’.

Equal number of sample villages/ blocks (FSUs) was allotted to each sub-round for survey

with a view to ensuring uniform spread of sample FSUs over the entire survey period.

1.4.4 Reference period

A reference period of last 365 days was used for most of the items under particulars of

living facilities and general particulars of the households living in houses etc.

1.5 State sample Report of the 69th round survey

The state sample report corresponding to 69th round survey on Drinking Water, Sanitation,

Hygiene and Housing Condition, a document entitled ‘Brief Report on Water, Sanitation,

Hygiene and Housing Condition in Odisha’ has been published earlier by Directorate of

Economics & Statistics.

1.6 Contents of this report

All the estimates presented in this report are based on the Central and State sample

pooled data. It contains Six Chapters and Three Appendices, Chapter one is Introductory

Chapter Two outlines the sample design and concepts and definitions, Chapter Three presents

on methodology of pooling and results of poolability test, Chapter Four and five present the

state, region and district level result on facilities of households on drinking water, sanitation


and housing condition. While Chapter six deals with relative standard error (RSE) of different

indicators used. Detailed tables of this report are presented in Appendix A while an outline of

the estimation procedure is presented in Appendix B. Appendix C gives a facsimile of the

Schedule 1.2 canvassed in the survey.

In this report, different estimates of indicators on drinking water, housing, hygiene

etc. at the household level have been presented for the thirty districts of Odisha. While using

the estimates, it may be kept in mind that the sample sizes may not be adequate enough for

getting sufficiently reliable estimates and interpretation thereof should be made with caution.

Similarly, while interpreting the results using estimates at much deeper cross-sectional level,

data users must keep in mind the inadequacy, if any, of the corresponding domain specific

samples before arriving at any conclusion.

While describing the results, estimated proportion (number per 1000) of indicators are

given for rural and urban sector. Also the estimates presented in this report, in general, refer

to the mid-point of the survey period (July- December 2012) of NSS 69th round, i.e.,

01.10.2012. But for convenience of presentation, we write the reference period as ‘2012’.


Chapter Two

SAMPLE DESIGN, CONCEPT & DEFINITION

2. Introduction

The National Sample Survey (NSS), set up by the Government of India in 1950 to collect

socio-economic data adopting scientific sampling methods, started its sixty-ninth round from

1st July 2012. The survey was conducted up to 31st December 2012. DE&S Odisha had

participated in this survey in a equal sample matching basis.

2.1 Subject Coverage: The 69th round (July 2012-December 2012) of NSS is earmarked

for surveys on Drinking water, Sanitation, Hygiene, Housing conditions and survey on slums.

The last survey on these subjects was conducted in 65th round of NSS (July 2008- June 2009).

2. 2 Outline of Survey Programme

2.3 Period of survey and work programme: The survey is of six months’ duration

starting on 1st July 2012 and ending on 31st December 2012. The survey period of this round

is divided into two sub-rounds of three months’ duration each as follows:

sub-round 1 : July - September 2012

sub-round 2 : October - December 2012

In each of these two sub-rounds equal number of sample villages/ blocks (FSUs) is

allotted for survey with a view to ensuring uniform spread of sample FSUs over the entire

survey period.

2.4 Schedules of enquiry: During this round, the following schedules of enquiry are being

canvassed:

Schedule 0.0 : list of households

Schedule 1.2 : drinking water, sanitation, hygiene and housing condition

Schedule 0.21 : particulars of slum(urban)


2.5 Participation of Odisha State

Odisha participated in the 69th round survey in equal sample matching basis

2.6 Sample Design

2.6.1 Outline of sample design: A stratified multi-stage design has been adopted for the

69th round survey. The first stage units (FSU) are the census villages in the rural sector and

Urban Frame Survey (UFS) blocks in the urban sector. The ultimate stage units (USU) are

households in both the sectors. In case of large FSUs, one intermediate stage of sampling is the

selection of two hamlet-groups (hgs)/ sub-blocks (sbs) from each rural/ urban FSU.

2.6.2 Sampling Frame for First Stage Units: For the rural sector, the list of 2001

census villages updated by excluding the villages urbanised and including the towns de-

urbanised after 2001 census constitutes the sampling frame. For the urban sector, the latest

updated list of UFS blocks (2007-12) is considered as the sampling frame.

2.6.3 Stratification: Within each district of Odisha, generally speaking, two basic strata

have been formed: i) rural stratum comprising of all rural areas of the district and (ii) urban

stratum comprising of all the urban areas of the district. However, within the urban areas of a

district, if there are one or more towns with population 10 lakhs or more as per population

census 2011 in a district, each of them forms a separate basic stratum and the remaining urban

areas of the district are considered as another basic stratum.

2.6.4 Sub-stratification:

Rural sector: If ‘r’ be the sample size allocated for a rural stratum, the number of sub-strata

formed is ‘r/2’. The villages within a district as per frame are first arranged in ascending order

of population. Then sub-strata 1 to ‘r/2’ is demarcated in such a way that each sub-stratum

comprises a group of villages of the arranged frame and have more or less equal population.

Urban sector: Each stratum is divided into 2 sub-strata as follows:

Sub-stratum 1: all UFS blocks having area type ‘slum area’

Sub-stratum 2: remaining UFS blocks


2.6.5 Total sample size (FSUs): 300 FSUs had been allocated for the state sample at

Odisha level (Rural-212 & Urban-88).

2.6.6 Allocation of total sample to State: The total number of sample FSUs have been

allocated to the States in proportion to population as per census 2011 subject to a minimum

sample allocation to each State. While doing so, the resource availability in terms of number of

field investigators as well as comparability with previous round of survey on the same subjects

has been kept in view.

2.6.7 Allocation of State level sample to rural and urban sectors: State level

sample size has been allocated between two sectors in proportion to population as per census

2011 with double weightage to urban sector. A minimum of 16 FSUs (minimum 8 each for

rural and urban sector separately) is allocated to each state.

2.6.8 Allocation to strata: Within each sector of a State, the respective sample size has

been allocated to the different strata in proportion to the population as per census 2011.

Allocations at stratum level are adjusted to multiples of 2 with a minimum sample size of 2.

2.7 Allocation to sub-strata:

2.7.1 Rural: Allocation is 2 for each sub-stratum in rural.

2.7.2 Urban: Stratum allocations have been distributed among the two sub-strata in proportion

to the number of FSUs in the sub-strata. Minimum allocation for each sub-stratum is 2. Equal

number of samples has been allocated among the two sub-rounds. Also, an additional sample

of FSUs in the form of sub-sample 3, equal to number of sample FSUs in each of the sub-

samples 1 & 2 was allocated in the sub-stratum 1 only.

2.8 Selection of FSU:

For the rural sector, from each stratum/ sub-stratum, required number of sample villages

has been selected by probability proportional to size with replacement (PPSWR), size being

the population of the village as per Census 2001. For the urban sector, UFS 2007-12 phase has

been used for all towns and cities and from each stratum/sub-stratum FSUs have been selected

by using Simple Random Sampling Without Replacement (SRSWOR). Both rural and urban

samples were drawn in the form of two independent sub-samples and equal number of samples


has been allocated among the two sub rounds. For urban sub-stratum 1, additional samples

have been drawn in the form of sub-sample 3 independently.

2.9 Selection of hamlet-groups/ sub-blocks - important steps

2.9.1 Criterion for hamlet-group/ sub-block formation:

After identification of the boundaries of the FSU, it is first determined whether listing

is to be done in the whole sample FSU or not. In case the approximate present population of

the selected FSU is found to be 1200 or more, it is divided into a suitable number (say, D) of

‘hamlet-groups’ in the rural sector and ‘sub-blocks’ in the urban sector by more or less

equalising the population as stated below.

approximate present population of the sample FSU no. of hg’s/sb’s to be formed

less than 1200 (no hamlet-groups/sub-blocks) 1

1200 to 1799 3

1800 to 2399 4

2400 to 2999 5

3000 to 3599 6

…………..and so on .

2.10 Formation and selection of hamlet-groups/ sub-blocks:

In case hamlet-groups/ sub-blocks are to be formed in the sample FSU, the same is done

by more or less equalizing population. While doing so, it is ensured that the hamlet-groups/

sub-blocks formed are clearly identifiable in terms of physical landmarks. Two hamlet-groups

(hg)/ sub-blocks (sb) are selected from a large FSU wherever hamlet-groups/ sub-blocks have

been formed in the following manner – one hg/ sb with maximum percentage share of

population is always selected and termed as hg/ sb 1; one more hg/ sb is selected from the

remaining hg’s/ sb’s by simple random sampling (SRS) and termed as hg/ sb 2. Listing and


selection of the households is done independently in the two selected hamlet-groups/ sub-

blocks. The FSUs without hg/ sb formation are treated as sample hg/ sb number 1. It is to be

noted that if more than one hg/ sb have same maximum percentage share of population, the one

among them which is listed first in block 4.2 of schedule 0.0 is treated as hg/ sb 1.

2.11 Formation of second stage strata and allocation of households

Two cut-off points ‘A’ and ‘B’ (in `) have been determined from NSS 66th round data

for each NSS region for urban areas in such a way that top 10% of the population have MPCE

more than ‘B’ and bottom 30% of the population have MPCE less than A. Households listed

in the selected FSU/ hamlet-group/ sub-block are stratified into three second stage strata (SSS).

Composition of the SSS and number of households to be surveyed from different SSS are as

follows:

SSS composition of SSS

number of households to be surveyed

FSU without

hg/sb formation

FSU with hg/sb

formation (for each

hg/sb) Rural

SSS 1: households having pucca dwelling

structure

4 2

SSS 2: households having semi-pucca

dwelling structure

4 2

SSS 3: other households (including those with

no structure)

4 2

Urban

SSS 1: households having MPCE > B

2 1

SSS 2: households having A ≤ MPCE ≤ B

4 2

SSS 3: households having MPCE A

6 3

2.12 Selection of households: From each SSS the sample households are selected by

SRSWOR.

2.13 Population coverage: The following rules regarding the population were covered


to during survey operation.

1. Under-trial prisoners in jails and indoor patients of hospitals, nursing homes etc., were

excluded, but residential staff therein was listed while listing was done in such

institutions. The persons of the first category were considered as normal members of

their parent households and were counted there. Convicted prisoners undergoing

sentence were outside the coverage of the survey.

2. Floating population, i.e., persons without any normal residence were not listed. But

households residing in open space, roadside shelter, under a bridge, etc., more or less

regularly in the same place, were listed.

3. Foreign nationals were not listed, nor do their domestic servants, if by definition the

latter belong to the foreign national's household. If, however, a foreign national

becomes an Indian citizen for all practical purposes, he or she was covered.

4. Persons residing in barracks of military and paramilitary forces (like police, BSF, etc.)

was kept outside the survey coverage due to difficulty in conduct of survey therein.

However, civilian population residing in their neighbourhood, including the family

quarters of service personnel, were covered.

5. Orphanages, rescue homes, ashrams and vagrant houses were outside the survey

coverage. However, persons staying in old age homes, students staying in ashrams/

hostels and the residential staff (other than monks/ nuns) of these ashrams were listed.

For orphanages, although orphans were not to be listed, the persons looking after them

and staying there were considered for listing.

2.14 : Every structure, tent, shelter, etc. is a house irrespective of its use. It may be used for

residential or non-residential purpose or both or even may be vacant.

2.15 Some concepts and definition of important terms

2.15.1 Household: A group of person’s normally living together and taking food from a

common kitchen constitutes a household. It includes temporary stay-aways (those whose total

period of absence from the household is expected to be less than 6 months) but excludes

temporary visitors and guests (expected total period of stay less than 6 months). Even though

the determination of the actual composition of a household was left to the judgment of the head

of the household, the following procedures was adopted as guidelines.

(i) Each inmate (including residential staff) of a hostel, mess, hotel, boarding and lodging


house, etc., would constitute a single-member household. If, however, a group of

persons among them normally pool their income for spending, they would together be

treated as forming a single household. For example, a family living in a hotel would be

treated as a single household.

(ii) In deciding the composition of a household, more emphasis was to be placed on

'normally living together' than on 'ordinarily taking food from a common kitchen'. In

case the place of residence of a person was different from the place of boarding, he or

she was treated as a member of the household with whom he or she resides.

(iii)A resident employee, or domestic servant, or a paying guest (but not just a tenant in the

household) was considered as a member of the household with whom he or she resides

even though he or she was not a member of the same family.

(iv) When a person sleeps in one place (say, in a shop or in a room in another house because

of space shortage) but usually takes food with his or her family, he or she was treated

not as a single member household but as a member of the household in which other

members of his or her family stayed.

(v) If a member of a family (say, a son or a daughter of the head of the family) stayed

elsewhere (say, in hostel for studies or for any other reason), he/ she was not considered

as a member of his/ her parent's household. However, he/ she were listed as a single

member household if the hostel was listed.

2.15.2 Household size: The number of members of a household is its size.

2.15.3 Household monthly per capita expenditure: Generally household consumer

expenditure is measured as the expenditure incurred by a household on domestic account

during a specified period, called reference period. It also includes the imputed values of goods

and services, which are not purchased but procured otherwise for consumption. In other words,

it is the sum total of monetary values of all the items (i.e. goods and services) consumed by the

household on domestic account during the reference period. The imputed rent of owner-

occupied houses is excluded from consumption expenditure. Any expenditure incurred towards

the productive enterprises of the households is also excluded from the household consumer

expenditure. Monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE) is the household consumer expenditure

over a period of 30 days divided by household size.

2.15.4 Dwelling unit: It is defined as the accommodation availed of by a household for its


residential purpose. It may be an entire structure or a part thereof or consisting of more than

one structure. There may be cases of more than one household occupying a single structure

such as those living in independent flats or sharing a single housing unit, in which case, there

will be as many dwelling units as the number of households sharing the structure. There may

also be cases of one household occupying more than one structure (i.e. detached structures for

sitting, sleeping, cooking, bathing etc.) for its housing accommodation. In this case, all the

structures together would constitute a single dwelling unit. In general, a dwelling unit consists

of living room, kitchen, store, bath, latrine, garage, open and closed veranda etc. A structure

or a portion thereof used exclusively for non-residential purposes or let out to other households

did not form part of the dwelling unit of the household under consideration. However, a portion

of a structure used for both residential and non-residential purposes was treated as part of the

dwelling unit except when the use of such portion for residential purpose was very nominal.

The dwelling unit covers all pucca, semi-pucca and katcha structures used by a household.

Households living more or less regularly in tents, under bridges, in pipes, under staircase, in

purely temporary flimsy improvisations built by the road side (which are liable to be removed

at any moment) etc., were considered to have no dwelling.

2.15.5 Building: Building is defined as a free-standing structure comprising one or more rooms

or other spaces covered by a roof and usually enclosed within external walls or dividing walls

which extend from the foundation to the roof. Dividing walls refer to the walls of adjoining

buildings, which are practically independent of one another and likely to have been built at

different times and owned by different persons. If more than one physically separated structure

constitute one living unit, all of them together also form a building. Usually, building will have

four external walls. But in some areas the nature of building construction is such that it has no

walls. Instead, it has a roof which almost touches the ground and it is provided with an entrance.

Such structures and also structures standing only on pillars were treated as buildings for the

purpose of the survey.

2.15.6 Independent house: A dwelling unit is considered as an independent house if it has a

separate structure and the structure is not shared with any other household. In other words, if

the dwelling unit and the entire structure of the house are physically the same, it was considered

as an independent house. In some parts, particularly in rural areas, two or more structures

together may constitute a single housing unit. While the main residence may be in one of the


structures, the other structures may be used for sleeping, sitting and for store, bath etc. In all

such cases, all the structures together would form a single housing unit and was treated as an

independent house.

2.15.7 Flat: A dwelling unit is considered as a flat if it is a part of a structure which is shared

with at least two households and the dwelling unit has housing facilities of water supply,

bathroom and latrine, which are used exclusively by the households or shared with households

residing in that structure. If the household reports that the facilities of water supply, bathroom

and latrine are shared with households residing in other structures, in such cases also such

dwelling unit was considered as flat. If households were residing in flat-like structure without

any one of the housing facilities like water supply, bathroom and latrine; those

structures/dwelling units were not considered as flat.

2.15.8 Pucca structure: A pucca structure is one whose walls and roofs are made of pucca

materials such as cement, concrete, oven burnt bricks, hollow cement / ash bricks, stone, stone

blocks, jack boards (cement plastered reeds), iron, zinc or other metal sheets, timber, tiles, slate,

corrugated iron, asbestos cement sheet, veneer, plywood, artificial wood of synthetic material

and poly vinyl chloride (PVC) material.

2.15.9 Katcha structure: A structure which has walls and roof made of non-pucca materials

is considered as a katcha structure. Non-pucca materials include unburnt bricks, bamboo, mud,

grass, leaves, reeds, thatch, etc. By definition, Katcha structures can be of the following two

types; (i) Unserviceable katcha structure, which includes all structures with thatch walls and

thatch roof, i.e., walls made of grass, leaves, reeds, etc. and roof of a similar material and (ii)

Serviceable katcha structure, which includes all katcha structures other than unserviceable

katcha structures.

2. 15.10 Semi-pucca structure: A structure which cannot be classified as a pucca or a katcha

structure as per definition is a semi-pucca structure. Such a structure will have either the walls

or the roof but not both, made of pucca materials.

2. 15.11 Room: it is defined as a constructed area with walls or partitions on all side with at

least one door way and a roof overhead. Wall / partition means a continuous solid structure

(except for the doors, windows, ventilators, air-holes, etc.) extending from floor to ceiling. A

constructed space with grill or net on one or more sides in place of wall or partition was not

considered as a room. In case of conical shaped structures in which the roof itself was built to


the floor level, the roof was considered as wall.

2. 15.12 Household type: The household type, based on the means of livelihood of a

household, as decided on the basis of the sources of the household's income during the 365

days preceding the date of survey. For this purpose, only the household's income (net income

and not gross income) from economic activities was considered; but the incomes of servants

and paying guests were not taken into account. In rural areas, a household belongs to any one

of the six household types viz. (a) self-employed in agriculture, (b) self-employed in non-

agriculture, (c) regular wage/salary earning, (d) casual labour in agriculture, (e) casual labour

in non-agriculture and (f) others. In urban area, four different types of households may be

obtained. These types are (a) self-employed, (b) regular wage/salary earners, (c) casual labour

and (d) others.

An urban household was assigned the household type self-employed, regular

wage/salary earning, casual labour or others depending on the major source of its income from

economic activities during the last 365 days. A household which did not have any income from

economic activities was classified as others.

2.15.13 Tenurial status of dwelling: A dwelling unit is considered to be ‘owned’ by the

sample household if permanent heritable possession with or without the right to transfer the

title is vested in a member or members of the household. Dwelling unit in owner-like

possession under long term lease or assignment is also considered as owned. If the sample

household has the right of permanent heritable possession of the dwelling unit with or without

the right to transfer the title, such dwelling units will be considered as ‘freehold’ and code 1

will be recorded. Dwelling units held under special conditions such that the holder does not

possess the title of ownership of the dwelling unit but the right for long term possession of the

dwelling unit (e.g., dwelling units possessed under perpetual lease, hereditary tenure and long

term lease for 30 years or more) will be considered as being ‘leasehold’ and for such type of

dwelling units code 2 will be considered. If the dwelling unit, in which the sample household

lives, is provided by an employer to a member of the sample household, such dwelling units

will be considered as ‘employer quarter’ and code 3 will be assigned. If the dwelling is taken

on rent, by the sample household, which is payable at monthly, quarterly or any other periodic

intervals or on lease, for a period of less than 30 years, it will be treated as a hired dwelling. It

may be noted that a hired dwelling unit may be free of rent also. If the sample household had


taken the dwelling unit in rent with written contract with its owner, for such dwelling unit, code

4 will be entered. On the other hand, if the sample household lives in a hired dwelling unit

without a written contract with the owner of the dwelling unit, code 5 will be entered for such

dwelling unit. Households living more or less regularly under staircase, in tents, in pipes, under

bridges, in purely temporary flimsy improvisations built by the roadside (which are liable to be

removed at any moment), are considered to have no dwellings and for such households code 6

will be recorded against this item. Code 9 will be entered in all other types of possession of the

dwelling unit (e.g., encroached one).

2.16 Sample Size

2.16.1 State level Size

Table 2.1: Number of first stage units (FSUs) allotted, surveyed and number of sample

households surveyed.

1 One sample village of Malkangiri was treated as causality.

S

ecto

r

Central sample State sample Pooled sample

FS

U a

llott

ed

FS

U s

urv

eyed

HH

su

rvey

ed

FS

U a

llott

ed

FS

U s

urv

eyed

HH

su

rvey

ed

FS

U a

llott

ed

FS

U s

urv

eyed

HH

su

rvey

ed

Rural 212 212 2488 212 2111 2532 424 423 5020

Urban 88 88 1056 88 88 1056 176 176 2112


2.16.2 District Level Sample Size

Table 2.2 : District wise number of fsu (villages/blocks) surveyed for Schedule 1.2: NSS 69th round ( Odisha )

DISTRICT

Rural Urban Rural + Urban

Cen

tra

l S

am

ple

Sta

te S

am

ple

Po

ole

d

(Cen

tra

l+ S

tate

)

Cen

tra

l S

am

ple

Sta

te S

am

ple

Po

ole

d

(Cen

tra

l+ S

tate

)

Cen

tra

l S

am

ple

Sta

te S

am

ple

Po

ole

d

(Cen

tra

l+ S

tate

)

BARGARH 8 8 16 4 4 8 12 12 24

JHARSUGUDA 2 2 4 4 4 8 6 6 12

SAMBALPUR 4 4 8 4 4 8 8 8 16

DEOGARH 2 2 4 2 2 4 4 4 8

SUNDARGARH 8 8 16 6 6 12 14 14 28

KEONJHAR 10 10 20 4 4 8 14 14 28

MAYURBHANJ 10 10 20 2 2 4 12 12 24

BALASORE 10 10 20 2 2 4 12 12 24

BHADRAK 8 8 16 2 2 4 10 10 20

KENDRAPARA 8 8 16 2 2 4 10 10 20

JAGATSINGHPUR 6 6 12 4 4 8 10 10 20

CUTTACK 10 10 20 6 6 12 16 16 32

JAJPUR 10 10 20 2 2 4 12 12 24

DHENKANAL 8 8 16 2 2 4 10 10 20

ANGUL 6 6 12 4 4 8 10 10 20

NAYAGARH 6 6 12 2 2 4 8 8 16

KHURDA 8 8 16 6 6 12 14 14 28

PURI 10 10 20 2 2 4 12 12 24

GANJAM 12 12 24 4 4 8 16 16 32

GAJAPATI 4 4 8 2 2 4 6 6 12

KANDHAMAL 4 4 8 2 2 4 6 6 12

BOUDH 4 4 8 2 2 4 6 6 12

SUBARNAPUR 4 4 8 2 2 4 6 6 12

BALANGIR 10 10 20 4 4 8 14 14 28

NUAPADA 4 4 8 2 2 4 6 6 12

KALAHANDI 10 10 20 2 2 4 12 12 24

RAYAGADA 6 6 12 2 2 4 8 8 16

NABARANGPUR 8 8 16 2 2 4 10 10 20

KORAPUT 6 8 14 2 2 4 8 10 18

MALKANGIRI 2 3 5 2 2 4 4 5 9

ODISHA 208 211 419 88 88 176 296 299 595


Table 2.3 District wise number of households surveyed for Schedule 1.2: NSS 69th round, (Odisha)

DISTRICT

Rural Urban Rural + Urban

Cen

tral

Sam

ple

Sta

te S

amp

le

Po

ole

d s

amp

les

(Cen

tral

+ S

tate

)

Cen

tral

Sam

ple

Sta

te S

amp

le

Po

ole

d s

amp

les

(Cen

tral

+ S

tate

)

Cen

tral

Sam

ple

Sta

te S

amp

le

Po

ole

d s

amp

les

(Cen

tral

+ S

tate

)

BARGARH 96 96 192 48 48 96 144 144 288

JHARSUGUDA 24 24 48 48 48 96 72 72 144

SAMBALPUR 48 48 96 48 48 96 96 96 192

DEOGARH 24 24 48 24 24 48 48 48 96

SUNDARGARH 96 96 192 72 72 144 168 168 336

KEONJHAR 120 120 240 48 48 96 168 168 336

MAYURBHANJ 120 120 240 24 24 48 144 144 288

BALASORE 120 120 240 24 24 48 144 144 288

BHADRAK 96 96 192 24 24 48 120 120 240

KENDRAPARA 96 96 192 24 24 48 120 120 240

JAGATSINGHPUR 72 72 144 48 48 96 120 120 240

CUTTACK 120 120 240 72 72 144 192 192 384

JAJPUR 120 120 240 24 24 48 144 144 288

DHENKANAL 96 96 192 24 24 48 120 120 240

ANGUL 72 72 144 48 48 96 120 120 240

NAYAGARH 72 72 144 24 24 48 96 96 192

KHURDA 96 96 192 72 72 144 168 168 336

PURI 120 120 240 24 24 48 144 144 288

GANJAM 144 144 288 48 48 96 192 192 384

GAJAPATI 48 48 96 24 24 48 72 72 144

KANDHAMAL 40 48 88 24 24 48 64 72 136

BOUDH 48 48 96 24 24 48 72 72 144

SUBARNAPUR 48 48 96 24 24 48 72 72 144

BALANGIR 120 120 240 48 48 96 168 168 336

NUAPADA 48 48 96 24 24 48 72 72 144

KALAHANDI 120 120 240 24 24 48 144 144 288

RAYAGADA 72 72 144 24 24 48 96 96 192

NABARANGPUR 96 96 192 24 24 48 120 120 240

KORAPUT 72 96 168 24 24 48 96 120 216

MALKANGIRI 24 36 60 24 24 48 48 60 108

ODISHA 2488 2532 5020 1056 1056 2112 3544 3588 7132


2.17 Reliability of result at district level

As households are the sample units for the survey the standard measure RSE (%) on estimated

no of households derived in the following tables show the reliability of district level result.

Table: 2.4 RSE (%) on estimated no of households for central, state and pooled samples

DISTRICT CENTAL SAMPLE STATE SAMPLE POOLED SAMPLE

RURAL URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL URBAN

BARGARH 12 27.48 3.62 31.69 6.32 24.61

JHARSUGUDA 2.45 8.97 12.12 29.21 6.02 10.88

SAMBALPUR 2.94 17.99 27.86 27.35 12.82 17.75

DEOGARH 2.02 31.45 3.46 12.82 1.99 17.18

SUNDARGARH 3.64 3.55 10.9 17.73 5.51 7.65

KEONJHAR 5.64 26.12 4.79 6.69 3.73 10.37

MAYURBHANJ 3.49 68.67 4.53 26.25 2.86 47.06

BALASORE 5.82 20.44 4.27 28.51 3.66 21.60

BHADRAK 2.78 70.98 1.5 10.76 1.60 36.19

KENDRAPARA 7.71 7.98 19.65 14.89 10.49 7.18

JAGATSINGHPUR 5.79 23.01 13.67 74 7.61 45.77

CUTTACK 4.63 18.61 4.87 2.95 3.37 8.54

JAJPUR 3.97 3.23 6.54 13.49 3.74 8.30

DHENKANAL 10.84 41.04 4.42 36.32 6.14 28.01

ANGUL 7.51 8.44 5.02 31.81 4.47 21.72

NAYAGARH 6.74 33.55 6.09 2.02 4.54 18.44

KHURDA 1.54 14.91 3.81 0.58 2.09 6.12

PURI 4.03 4.52 4.41 4.73 2.99 3.42

GANJAM 4.23 25.52 1.58 50.09 2.36 29.23

GAJAPATI 16.98 28.93 2.26 12.24 9.10 15.78

KANDHAMAL 12.74 13.64 11.41 73.93 8.50 44.54

BOUDH 6.81 27.63 1.74 31.83 3.60 23.42

SUBARNAPUR 1.16 8.43 6.59 4.58 3.28 4.92

BALANGIR 5.7 9.59 7.81 42.5 4.90 29.14

NUAPADA 5.41 28.38 3.01 9.6 3.20 14.59

KALAHANDI 23.65 21.52 5.82 24.09 14.25 16.52

RAYAGADA 17.51 25.71 1.73 19.83 9.46 16.26

NABARANGPUR 6.24 18.89 10.46 22.48 5.85 15.32

KORAPUT 12.38 8.47 3.46 39.01 7.04 27.59

MALKANGIRI 0 27.27 2.15 33.83 1.18 21.78

ODISHA 1.86 5.22 1.45 5.8 1.19 4.07

In all cases RSE (%) on estimated no of households for pooled sample is less than other

two. In case of pooled sample the RSE is less than 5% for both rural and urban sectors. Again

for all district RSE (%) is less than 15% in rural sector but in case of urban the RSE is found

more.


Chapter Three

TESTING POOLABILITY & METHODOLOGY OF POOLING

3.1 Poolability test

Though the central sample and state sample are drawn independently following

identical sampling design with same concepts, definitions and instructions to collect the state

sample data, there is also expected agency bias in the two sets of data generated by different

agencies. As such they cannot be merged for generating pooled estimate without testing that

the samples are realized from identical distribution function. Since the parametric

distribution of the sample mean is unknown non-parametric tests such Run test are chi-

square test were being adopted to test that the samples are coming from identical distribution

function.

3.2 Parameters Considered for Pooling

Through NSS 69th round, DES Odisha collected information on various facets of

living particulars situation in Odisha, during the period July 2012- December 2012. The NSS

data cannot be used directly to produce reliable estimates at the district level due to small

sample sizes. Pooling of Central and State sample data is one of the important ways to solve

the problem of inadequate sample size for releasing district level estimates. By pooling NSS

69th round Central and State data on living particulars estimate of some key indicators in

Odisha at the district level have been derived and are presented in this report. Considering the

small sample size at district level following broad parameters were considered for pooling

• Access to drinking water

• Access to bathroom

• Access to latrine

• Per capita floor area for dwelling unit

• Structure type of the dwelling units


3.3 Non-parametric test

3.3.1 Chi-Square (χ2) test

For discrete data such as access to drinking water facility, bathroom facility, latrine

facility and structure type of the dwelling units’ relevant chi-square test has been used after

grouping the categorical variables in to a suitable number of classes so that each class contains

adequate number of sample observations. If we take X and Y as the variables with cumulative

distribution function Fs(x) and Fc(y) where C and S are the notation for central and state samples

respectively, then the null hypothesis for χ2 test is

H0: Fs(x) = Fc(x), for all x against the alternative hypothesis

H1: Fs (x) > Fc(x) and Fs(x) < Fc(x) for some x.

2X k contingency table for k classes are constructed as follows.

Sample-

type

No of sample observation Total

Class-1 Class-2 .. Class-k

State N11

N12

.. N1k

N1.

Central N21

N22

.. N2k

N2.

Total N.1

N.2

.. N.k

N..

Observed frequency of each cell Oij= Nij, where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to k.

Expected frequency of each cell Eij= (Ni. * N.j)/N..

Where i= 1 to 2, j= 1 to k.

With degrees of freedom = (2-1)*(k-1) = k-1

3.3.2 Wald-Wolfowitz run test:

For continuous variable like per capita floor area (PCFA) relevant run test has been used

.Suppose X and Y are independent random variables with cumulative distribution function

(CDF) as Fs(x) and Fc(y) .Null Hypothesis to be tested is H0: Fs(x) = Fc(x) for all x against

alternative Hypothesis is H1: Fs(x) > Fc(x) or Fs(x) < Fc(x) for some x. Let x1, x2, ….., xm


be iid observation from state sample with distributive function Fs and y1, y2,…..,yn be iid

observation from central sample with distributive function Fc. Merge the data and order them

with respect to comparable characteristic under consideration MPCE. In the merged data order

sequence: put “1” for X and “0” for Y. Let U be the total runs observed where 'run' is a sequence

of adjacent equal symbols. For example, following sequence: 1111000111001111110000 is

divided in six runs, three of them are made out of “1” and the others are made out of “0”. The

total runs U is a random variable whose distribution is large sample can be treated as normal

with mean and variance as follows:

𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 = 𝐸(𝑈) =2𝑚𝑛

𝑚 + 𝑛+ 1

𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒(𝑈) =2𝑚𝑛(2𝑚𝑛 − 𝑚 − 𝑛)

(𝑚 + 𝑛)2 (𝑚 + 𝑛 − 1)

As our survey is based on large sample, U is to be normalized to Z i.e.

Z)(

)(

UV

UEU

3.3 Parametric test

Let tyc and tys be the estimate of Y at domain level of pooling based on central and state

sample respectively with corresponding variances V(tyc) and V(tys). For large sample, making

all assumption of parametric test, one may use Z-Statistic to test the null hypothesis

H0 E(tyc) = E(tys) against the alternative hypothesis

H0 E(tyc) ≠ E(tys) where E stands for expectation.

))()((

)( =Z

ysyc

ysyc

tVtV

tt

Where V(tyc) and V(tys) could be estimated as

4/)()(4/)()( 2

21

^2

21

^

ysys

l

ysycyc

l

yc tttVandtttV


Based on sub-sample 1 & 2 estimates where the summation will be taken for stratum x

sub-stratum level variance at the domain of pooling.This test considers the variance of both the

estimates of state and central sample and also considers the difference of two estimates. So it

is also called as equality test. For some indicator like pcfa (per capita floor area) this test has

been applied.

3.4 Result of Poolability test at district level.

3.4.1: Test for access to bathroom

Table 3.1: District wise result of chi-square test on access to bathroom for pooled sample. χ20.01= 9.

21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

District

Rural Urban

Chi-square value Accept Chi-square value Accept BARGARH 5.072 YES 4.054 YES JHARSUGUDA 1.181 YES 4.572 YES SAMBALPUR 1.153 YES 10.419 NO DEOGARH 2.145 YES 0.099 YES SUNDARGARH 12.553 NO 13.733 NO KEONJHAR 0.779 YES 6.548 YES MAYURBHANJ 4.106 YES 3.030 YES BALASORE 19.549 N 0.762 YES BHADRAK 10.972 NO 0.981 YES KENDRAPARA 3.569 YES 13.737 NO JAGATSINGHPUR 0.629 YES 21.100 NO CUTTACK 12.882 NO 1.558 YES JAJPUR 3.181 YES 11.597 NO DHENKANAL 4.984 YES 14.214 NO ANGUL 6.986 YES 26.819 NO NAYAGARH 0.078 YES 1.220 YES KHURDA 7.072 YES 22.045 NO PURI 7.203 YES 10.397 NO GANJAM 7.041 YES 1.990 YES GAJAPATI 1.787 YES 15.839 NO KANDHAMAL 2.567 YES 9.048 YES BOUDH 2.494 YES 5.463 YES SUBARNAPUR 2.938 YES 2.271 YES BALANGIR 8.564 YES 0.659 YES NUAPADA 6.062 YES 11.231 NO KALAHANDI 12.487 NO 1.846 YES RAYAGADA 0.592 YES 17.124 NO NABARANGPUR 2.753 YES 1.378 YES KORAPUT 7.837 YES 2.266 YES MALKANGIRI 0.155 YES 13.706 NO

For the variable access to bathroom facility, 25 districts of rural Odisha and 17 districts

of urban Odisha have satisfied the Poolability chi-square test.


3.4.2: Test for access to drinking water

Table 3.2: District wise result of chi-square test on access to drinking water for

pooled sample. χ20.01= 9. 21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ2

0.01

District

Rural Urban

Chi-square value Accept Chi-square value Accept

BARGARH 4.725 YES 1.043 YES

JHARSUGUDA 23.534 NO 2.931 YES

SAMBALPUR 10.766 NO 0 YES

DEOGARH 26.001 NO 0.001 YES

SUNDARGARH 15.869 NO 0.355 YES

KEONJHAR 8.988 YES 15.019 NO

MAYURBHANJ 64.612 NO 0 YES

BALASORE 0 YES 0 YES

BHADRAK 1.88 YES 0 YES

KENDRAPARA 0 YES 0.001 YES

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 YES 0 YES

CUTTACK 31.411 NO 9.237 NO

JAJPUR 5.938 YES 0 YES

DHENKANAL 0.771 YES 0.356 YES

ANGUL 2.114 YES 0 YES

NAYAGARH 0.909 YES 9.979 NO

KHURDA 41.412 NO 0.355 YES

PURI 5.657 YES 0 YES

GANJAM 2.06 YES 1.103 YES

GAJAPATI 23.587 NO 0.4 YES

KANDHAMAL 6.367 YES 4.41 YES

BOUDH 0.3 YES 0 YES

SUBARNAPUR 2.182 YES 0 YES

BALANGIR 9.643 NO 0 YES

NUAPADA 0.366 YES 0 YES

KALAHANDI 4.706 YES 1.18 YES

RAYAGADA 27.4 NO 0 YES

NABARANGPUR 0 YES 0 YES

KORAPUT 0.101 YES 0 YES

MALKANGIRI 0.991 YES 0 YES

For the variable access to drinking water, 20 districts of rural Odisha and 27 districts of urban

Odisha have satisfied the Poolability chi-square test.


3.4.3: Test for access to latrine

Table 3.3: District wise result of chi-square test on access to latrine for

pooled sample. χ20.01= 9. 21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ20.01

District

Rural Urban

Chi-square

value

Accept Chi-square

value

Accept

BARGARH 5.072 YES 4.054 YES

JHARSUGUDA 1.181 YES 4.572 YES

SAMBALPUR 1.153 YES 10.419 NO

DEOGARH 2.145 YES 0.099 YES

SUNDARGARH 12.553 NO 13.733 NO

KEONJHAR 0.779 YES 6.548 YES

MAYURBHANJ 4.106 YES 3.030 YES

BALASORE 19.549 NO 0.762 YES

BHADRAK 10.972 NO 0.981 YES

KENDRAPARA 3.569 YES 13.737 NO

JAGATSINGHPUR 0.629 YES 21.100 NO

CUTTACK 12.882 NO 1.558 YES

JAJPUR 3.181 YES 11.597 NO

DHENKANAL 4.984 YES 14.214 NO

ANGUL 6.986 YES 26.819 NO

NAYAGARH 0.078 YES 1.220 YES

KHURDA 7.072 YES 22.045 NO

PURI 7.203 YES 10.397 NO

GANJAM 7.041 YES 1.990 YES

GAJAPATI 1.787 YES 15.839 NO

KANDHAMAL 2.567 YES 9.048 YES

BOUDH 2.494 YES 5.463 YES

SUBARNAPUR 2.938 YES 2.271 YES

BALANGIR 8.564 YES 0.659 YES

NUAPADA 6.062 YES 11.231 NO

KALAHANDI 12.487 NO 1.846 YES

RAYAGADA 0.592 YES 17.124 NO

NABARANGPUR 2.753 YES 1.378 YES

KORAPUT 7.837 YES 2.266 YES

MALKANGIRI 0.155 YES 13.706 NO

For the variable access to latrine, 25 districts of rural Odisha and 17 districts of urban Odisha

have satisfied the Poolability chi-square test.


3.4.3: Test for structure type

Table 3.4: District wise result of chi-square test on structure of house for pooled

sample. χ20.01= 9. 21 df = 2 [one sided test] reject if χ2-value > χ2

0.01

Rural Urban

District Chi-square value Accept Chi-square value Accept

BARGARH 1.50 Y 3.37 Y

JHARSUGUDA 7.05 Y 0.26 Y

SAMBALPUR 7.35 Y 2.71 Y

DEOGARH 1.68 Y 7.15 Y

SUNDARGARH 37.85 N 22.17 N

KEONJHAR 12.18 N 3.14 Y

MAYURBHANJ 3.47 Y 7.22 Y

BALASORE 0.00 Y 2.64 Y

BHADRAK 0.03 Y 4.71 Y

KENDRAPARA 0.03 Y 14.87 N

JAGATSINGHPUR 0.68 Y 1.16 Y

CUTTACK 2.55 Y 27.76 N

JAJPUR 0.03 Y 7.03 Y

DHENKANAL 0.03 Y 1.88 Y

ANGUL 22.80 N 27.32 N

NAYAGARH 1.82 Y 3.11 Y

KHURDA 0.10 Y 3.51 Y

PURI 0.23 Y 4.71 Y

GANJAM 0.88 Y 0.37 Y

GAJAPATI 4.62 Y 3.09 Y

KANDHAMAL 0.09 Y 0.67 Y

BOUDH 1.54 Y 1.23 Y

SUBARNAPUR 3.33 Y 0.40 Y

BALANGIR 20.20 N 8.84 Y

NUAPADA 28.28 N 6.39 Y

KALAHANDI 2.53 Y 4.75 Y

RAYAGADA 9.14 Y 13.26 N

NABARANGPUR 9.00 Y 5.39 Y

KORAPUT 2.39 Y 0.41 Y

MALKANGIRI 6.08 Y 1.84 Y

In both rural and urban sectors of Odisha for the variable structure of house 25 districts satisfy

the chi-square test. But the test satisfying districts are different for rural and urban sector.


3.4.4: Run test for percapita floor area

Table 3.5: District wise result of run test for per capita floor area (Z 0.01 = - 2.33 [one sided est])

District Rural Odisha Urban Odisha

Z value ACCEPT Z value ACCEPT

BARGARH -2.60 N 0 Y

JHARSUGUDA -0.88 Y -0.62 Y

SAMBALPUR -1.64 Y -0.62 Y

DEOGARH -0.58 Y -2.04 Y

SUNDARGARH -4.63 N -1.84 Y

KEONJHAR -5.17 N -0.41 Y

MAYURBHANJ -3.49 N -1.75 Y

BALASORE 0.52 Y 1.17 Y

BHADRAK -1.45 Y 0.29 Y

KENDRAPARA -0.43 Y 0.00 Y

JAGATSINGHPUR -0.50 Y -1.03 Y

CUTTACK -7.50 N -4.68 N

JAJPUR -1.81 Y -2.63 N

DHENKANAL -3.62 N -1.46 Y

ANGUL -4.01 N -2.46 N

NAYAGARH -1.51 Y 0.00 Y

KHURDA -4.49 N -3.51 N

PURI -6.60 N -2.04 Y

GANJAM -3.07 N -1.03 Y

GAJAPATI 0.41 Y -0.58 Y

KANDHAMAL -1.87 Y 0.29 Y

BOUDH -3.90 N -1.17 Y

SUBARNAPUR 0.21 Y 0.00 Y

BALANGIR -5.56 N -3.08 N

NUAPADA -2.26 Y 0.00 Y

KALAHANDI -5.30 N -0.58 Y

RAYAGADA -2.01 Y -3.21 N

NABARANGPUR -2.46 N -1.46 Y

KORAPUT -0.68 Y -2.04 Y

MALKANGIRI -0.76 Y -0.29 Y

For the variable percapita floor area 16 districts of rural Odisha and 24 districts of urban Odisha

satisfy the run test.As in above case out of 30 districts majority districts have satisfied


poolability test but in rural sector 14 have not satisfied the run test deriving the estimates and

variance of both central and state sample the equality test has been done as follows.

3.4.4: Equality test for percapita floor area

Table 3.6: District wise results by parametric Z test of average floor area for pooled sample with Z=2.575

District

Rural Odisha Urban Odisha Odisha

z_ value Accept z_ value Accept z_ value Accept

BARGARH 2.60 N 0.99 Y 2.50 Y JHARSUGUDA 1.37 Y 62.40 N 1.12 Y SAMBALPUR 0.91 Y 0.12 Y 0.28 Y DEOGARH 0.07 Y 5.41 N 0.05 Y SUNDARGARH 0.09 Y 0.91 Y 0.25 Y KEONJHAR 1.38 Y 0.34 Y 1.43 Y MAYURBHANJ 2.69 N 1.47 Y 2.69 N BALASORE 2.72 N 1.18 Y 3.57 N BHADRAK 1.11 Y 0.37 Y 1.15 Y KENDRAPARA 1.54 Y 0.29 Y 1.41 Y JAGATSINGHPUR 0.81 Y 1.72 Y 0.43 Y CUTTACK 1.53 Y 0.16 Y 1.28 Y JAJPUR 0.28 Y 0.53 Y 0.47 Y DHENKANAL 2.54 Y 0.59 Y 1.87 Y ANGUL 2.52 Y 1.01 Y 2.73 N NAYAGARH 0.02 Y 0.02 Y 0.02 Y KHURDA 3.14 N 1.93 Y 3.48 N PURI 2.65 N 1.88 Y 2.88 N GANJAM 1.49 Y 1.40 Y 1.04 Y GAJAPATI 0.67 Y 0.15 Y 0.63 Y KANDHAMAL 0.25 Y 10.52 N 0.25 Y BOUDH 0.30 Y 0.21 Y 0.44 Y SUBARNAPUR 0.57 Y 0.02 Y 0.55 Y BALANGIR 0.69 Y 0.05 Y 0.65 Y NUAPADA 0.06 Y 0.23 Y 0.05 Y KALAHANDI 0.85 Y 3.49 N 0.86 Y RAYAGADA 0.64 Y 1.19 Y 0.60 Y NABARANGPUR 0.72 Y 0.29 Y 0.73 Y KORAPUT 0.46 Y 0.29 Y 0.25 Y MALKANGIRI 1.53 Y 2.28 Y 1.85 Y ODISHA 3.90 N 1.67 Y 4.77 N

As per equality Z test, in rural Odisha, 25 districts, in urban Odisha 26 districts and in the

combined sector of Odisha 25 districts satisfied parametric Z test on average floor area of

dwelling.


3.5 Methodology of pooling:

Two alternate methods are used in pooling the central and state sample data.

3.5.1: Weighting by matching ratio (MR)

Building aggregate estimate of pooled sample in proportion matching ratio m: n of state

and central sample aggregate estimate where m and n are the allotted sample for central and

state sample separately for rural and urban sector. Building ratio estimate of pooled sample as

ratio of aggregate estimates. As the Central and State Sample are selected using same sampling

design from same population with equal matching basis the pooling result based on matching

ratio method is more acceptable. This method has been used for computation of pooled

multiplier before estimation.

3.5.2: Weighting by inverse of variance (IV)

This estimates are built by weighting the ratio estimate of central and state sample in

proportion to inverse of variance of ratio. However if the estimated variances are wide apart

then the resulting estimates may not be superior. This may be the case when non-sampling

errors are present. By this method pooled estimate has been derived using the central and state

sample estimates and relative standard error of the respective samples.

The analysis part of this report is based on the pooling result derived by using the

Matching Ratio (MR)method.


Chapter Four

DRINKING WATER & SANITATION FACILITIES

4.1 Introduction

The availability of basic living facilities like drinking water, bathroom, latrine, housing

etc. to each individual of a nation is thus a-priori requirement for its growth and development.

Development of any nation depends upon its capability to produce goods and services and

generate income, for the uplift of the livelihood status of its inhabitants. A person staying in a

healthy and sustainable environment can naturally contribute much more to the development

process than his counterpart who stays in a not so healthy environment. With rapidly growing

population, it is perhaps the most difficult task of the respective governments, especially in the

developing countries, to create sustainable infrastructure for ensuring decent living of its

inhabitants.

4.2 Drinking water facility

In this report the drinking water facilities are meant as access to different sources (like

principal and supplementary source) of drinking water at the household level. Principal source

of drinking water will relate to that source of drinking water which is used most commonly (in

terms of frequency) by the household during the last 365 days. Bottled water, Piped water into

dwelling and piped water to yard/plot, Public tap/standpipe, Tube well/borehole, Protected

well/unprotected well, Protected spring/unprotected spring, Rainwater collection, Surface

water, Others (tanker-truck, cart with small tank or drum, etc.) are some of the principal

sources of drinking water.

The quality of drinking water is another important concern for maintaining good health

of the community. Many households strive to enhance the quality of water they drink by

adopting various methods for treating the water before drinking and how many of these

households are actually treating water before drinking would be of interest. The quality and

treatment of drinking water also depends upon the place where the drinking water is usually


stored. Also, some households may have to resort to various other supplementary sources to

meet their daily need of drinking water. The following analysis seeks to address all these issues.

Another important aspect of drinking water facility is the nature of access of it enjoyed by the

household. Households having exclusive use of principal drinking water source are in a better

position than those who have to resort to community use for the same purpose. Here access

was defined in terms of the prevailing situation reported by the sample household in respect of

the principal source of drinking water that was used and not the legal right to use the source of

drinking water.

4.2.1 State level Result on drinking water facilities

4.2.1.1 Sufficiency:

An important aspect of drinking water facility is its availability in sufficient amount

throughout the year. The availability of drinking water from the principal source was taken as

sufficient throughout the year if, in each of the calendar months of the year, availability of

drinking water was sufficient. If in any particular month, the availability of drinking water was

not sufficient for majority of the days, availability was considered as not sufficient in that

month.

In rural Odisha

83.2 percent of

households were getting

sufficent drinking water

from principal source,

while 85.4 percentage of

households in urban

Odisha were getting

sufficent drinking water

from principal source.

Table 4.1 Percentage of households having ‘sufficient’

drinking water (principal source) throughout the year

Sector % of households getting

sufficient drinking water

throughout year

Rural 83.2

Urban 85.4

Rural + Urban 83.6


Quality of Drinking water

Good Quality of drinking water leads to a healthy & hygienic living. Table 4.2 shows

sector wise quality of drinking water from principal source in Odisha

In rural Odisha, 13.4 percent of households reported the quality of drinking water from

principal source as defective, while in urban Odisha 8.9 percent reported as defective.

Treatment of drinking water

The treatment of drinking water is an important determinant of quality of drinking water

and hygienic living, as many households treat water by one or more methods before drinking.

Rural, 13.4

Urban, 8.9

Odisha, 12.7

RURAL URBAN ODISHA

Figure 4.1 Percentage of households reported defective quality of drinking water from principal source

Table 4.2 Percentage distribution of households according to Quality of Drinking water

from (principal source) in Odisha during the year 2012.

Sector Bad in taste Bad in

smell

Bad in

taste and

smell

Bad due to

other

reasons

No defect N.R. All

Rural 2.5 0.4 3.6 6.9 86.7 0 100

Urban 0.6 3.1 0.6 4.6 91.0 0 100

Rural +

Urban

2.2 0.8 3.2 6.5 87.3 0 100


Treatment of water can be done through boiling, filtering, by using chemicals, by using

electronic purifier or by any other method.

Table: - 4.3 Sector wise per thousand distribution of households according to various

Method of treatment of drinking water.

Method of treatment Rural Urban Rural + Urban

Electronic purifier 27 347 112

Boiling 75 84 77

Chemically treated with alum 2 5 3

Chemically treated with bleach/chlorine

tablets

53 36 48

Filtered with water

filter(candle,cream,sand,etc)

220 365 258

Filtered with cloth 514 130 412

Not treated 109 33 89

All 1000 1000 1000

In rural Odisha 51.4 percent of households used ‘filtered with cloth’ as major method of

treatment of drinking water, followed by 22 percent of households used ‘filtered with water

filter (candle, cream, sand, etc.)’. Similarly for urban Odisha, 36.5 percent of households used

‘filtered with water filter (candle, cream, sand, etc.)’ as major method of treatment of drinking

water, followed by 34.7 percent of households used electronic purifier as 2nd major method.

Rural, 22.9

Urban, 46.5

Odisha, 26.5

RURAL URBAN ODISHA

Figure 4.2 Percentage of households treating drinking water in Odisha


During the year 2012, in Urban Odisha 46.5 percent households & 22.9 percent households in

Rural Odisha are using drinking water from primary source after treatment.

Nature of access to the principal source of drinking water:

Table 4.4: Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking

water in Odisha

Access to the principal source of drinking water

Sector

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g

n.r

.

Est

ima

ted

(00

)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sa

mp

le

ho

use

ho

lds

Rural Odisha 118 67 36 762 17 1000 77802 5020

Urban Odisha 384 252 27 334 3 1000 14979 2112

Rural + Urban

Odisha 161 97 35 693 15 1000 92780 7132

It is observed that ‘community use’ of principal source of drinking water was

predominant among households of rural Odisha (76.2%) whereas ‘exclusive use’ was more

prevalent among households in urban Odisha (38.4%).

11.8

38.4

16.1

Rural Odisha Urban Odisha Rural+Urban Odisha

Figure 4.3: Percentage of households who had exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water in 2012


Table 4.4 presents number per 1000 households by nature of access to the principal

source of drinking water for each sector of Odisha during 2012. It is observed that ‘community

use’ of principal source of drinking water was predominant among households of rural Odisha

(76.2 percent) whereas ‘exclusive use’ was more prevalent among households in urban Odisha

(38.4 percent). Figure 4.3 shows the proportion of households who had the opportunity of

‘exclusive use’ of their principal source of drinking water. The percentage of households who

had exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water is found more in urban Odisha i.e.

38.4% while for rural Odisha it is 11.8% only.

4.2.2 Region level Result on drinking water facilities

Table-4.5 Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking

water for each region of Odisha

Region Access to the principal source of drinking water

Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e

use

of

the

ho

use

ho

ld

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur’

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g

nr

Rural Odisha

Coastal 219 99 64 615 3 1000 26602 1824

Southern 44 53 4 862 37 1000 28082 1803

Northern 91 47 44 809 9 1000 23117 1393

All 118 67 36 762 17 1000 77802 5020

Urban Odisha

Coastal 402 274 21 302 1 1000 6681 673

Southern 399 168 30 402 0 1000 3412 671

Northern 348 279 33 331 8 1000 4885 768

All 384 252 27 334 3 1000 14979 2112

Odisha

Coastal 256 134 55 552 2 1000 33284 2497

Southern 82 66 7 812 33 1000 31494 2474

Northern 136 88 42 726 9 1000 28002 2161

All 161 97 35 693 15 1000 92780 7132


Table 4 .5 presents number per 1000 households by nature of access to the principal

source of drinking water for each region of Odisha during 2012. It is observed that in rural

Odisha ‘community use’ of principal source of drinking water was found highest among

households of southern region (86.2 percent) followed by northern region (80.9percent) and it

was found lowest in coastal region (61.5 percent) .Whereas ‘exclusive use’ was more prevalent

among households in urban Odisha (38.4 percent) . Figure 4.4 shows the proportion of

households who had the opportunity of ‘exclusive use’ of their principal source of drinking

water for each region of Odisha. In rural Odisha the percentage of households who had

exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water was found more in the coastal region

i.e. 21.9% while it was found lowest in the southern region i.e. 4.4% only. In urban Odisha the

percentage of households who had exclusive use of their principal source of drinking water

was found more in the coastal region i.e. 40.2% while it was found lowest in the northern region

of urban Odisha i.e. 34.8%.

4.2.3 District level Result on drinking water facilities

Table 4.6R shows number per 1000 households by nature of access to the principal

source of drinking water for different districts of rural Odisha during 2012. Among districts in

rural Odisha, Malkangiri (0%), Rayagada (0%) and Balangir (0.1%) had the lowest and

Jagatsinghpur (39.7%), Khurda (36.3%) and Balasore (32.3%) had the highest proportion of

households having exclusive accesses to their respective principal source of drinking water. In

21.9

4.49.1

11.8

40.2 39.934.8

38.4

25.6

8.213.6

16.1

Co

asta

l

Sou

the

rn

No

rth

ern All

Co

asta

l

Sou

the

rn

No

rth

ern All

Co

asta

l

Sou

the

rn

No

rth

ern All

Rural Urban Rural+Urban

Figure 4.4: Percentage of households who had exclusive access to the principal source of drinking water for each region


case of community use of principal source of drinking water, in rural areas, Khurda (39.7%),

Jagatsinghpur (43.1%), Bhadrak (56.4%) had the lowest estimated proportion of households

and Malkagiri (100%), Jharsuguda (99.5%), Nabarangpur (98.8%) had the highest estimated


Table 4.6R: Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in

rural Odisha

District


Est

imat

ed

(00

)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e

use

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

incl

ud

ing

nr

BARGARH 7 3 53 938 0 1000 3399 192

JHARSUGUDA 5 0 0 995 0 1000 768 48

SAMBALPUR 76 2 0 902 20 1000 1735 96

DEOGARH 13 0 0 987 0 1000 683 48

SUNDARGARH 89 12 2 898 0 1000 2718 192

KEONJHAR 77 103 40 781 0 1000 3498 240

MAYURBHANJ 133 58 85 692 32 1000 5251 240

BALASORE 323 64 33 580 0 1000 4112 240

BHADRAK 188 157 90 564 0 1000 2653 192

KENDRAPARA 147 0 0 853 0 1000 2770 192

JAGATSINGHPUR 397 97 75 431 0 1000 2298 144

CUTTACK 188 74 42 696 0 1000 3932 240

JAJPUR 152 164 165 512 7 1000 3761 240

DHENKANAL 101 123 90 686 0 1000 2528 192

ANGUL 186 30 4 781 0 1000 2533 144

NAYAGARH 2 22 25 931 20 1000 2087 144

KHURDA 363 173 68 397 0 1000 2202 192

PURI 207 139 61 593 0 1000 2788 240

GANJAM 81 2 1 911 4 1000 5931 288

GAJAPATI 23 0 0 896 81 1000 1167 96

KANDHAMAL 124 0 36 727 113 1000 1524 88

BOUDH 96 45 8 851 0 1000 1079 96

SUBARNAPUR 25 89 28 859 0 1000 1289 96

BALANGIR 1 5 0 985 8 1000 3676 240

NUAPADA 141 10 0 850 0 1000 1241 96

KALAHANDI 42 169 0 737 52 1000 3708 240

RAYAGADA 0 101 0 739 160 1000 2088 144

NABARANGPUR 3 9 0 988 0 1000 2221 192

KORAPUT 16 142 1 775 67 1000 3044 168

MALKANGIRI 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 1119 60

ODISHA 118 67 36 762 17 1000 77802 5020


Table 4.6U: Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking

water in urban Odisha

District


Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e

use

of

the

ho

use

ho

ld

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g

nr

BARGARH 363 402 17 216 2 1000 493 96

JHARSUGUDA 234 510 2 253 2 1000 833 96

SAMBALPUR 415 211 59 314 0 1000 785 96

DEOGARH 39 202 0 760 0 1000 63 48

SUNDARGARH 391 213 3 392 1 1000 1303 144

KEONJHAR 180 119 27 591 83 1000 445 96

MAYURBHANJ 468 118 169 245 0 1000 368 48

BALASORE 210 341 2 446 0 1000 781 48

BHADRAK 117 246 107 530 0 1000 355 48

KENDRAPARA 225 395 94 267 18 1000 170 48

JAGATSINGHPUR 337 459 33 168 3 1000 201 96

CUTTACK 370 98 32 501 0 1000 1648 144

JAJPUR 492 306 84 118 0 1000 195 48

DHENKANAL 193 532 0 275 0 1000 245 48

ANGUL 545 157 81 217 0 1000 350 96

NAYAGARH 20 31 0 949 0 1000 102 48

KHURDA 508 323 2 166 0 1000 2715 144

PURI 559 426 3 12 0 1000 513 48

GANJAM 411 281 19 289 0 1000 1220 96

GAJAPATI 272 227 81 420 0 1000 119 48

KANDHAMAL 323 303 53 321 0 1000 97 48

BOUDH 538 77 26 360 0 1000 37 48

SUBARNAPUR 58 71 6 866 0 1000 93 48

BALANGIR 88 80 23 807 1 1000 433 96

NUAPADA 650 82 0 267 0 1000 56 48

KALAHANDI 302 131 68 499 0 1000 267 48

RAYAGADA 391 176 8 426 0 1000 296 48

NABARANGPUR 347 0 31 622 0 1000 152 48

KORAPUT 741 6 51 203 0 1000 548 48

MALKANGIRI 449 377 8 165 0 1000 96 48

ODISHA 384 252 27 334 3 1000 14979 2112

Among districts in urban Odisha, Nayagarh(2%),Deogarh(3.9%) and

Subarnapur(5.8%) had the lowest and Koraput (74.1%),Nuapada (65%) and Puri(55.9%) had

the highest proportion of households having exclusive accesses to their respective principal

source of drinking water .In case of community use of principal source of drinking water in


urban areas, Puri (1.2%), Jajpur (11.8%) and Malkangiri (16.5%) had the lowest and

Nayagarh(94.9%), Subarnapur (86.6%) and Balangir (80.7%) had the highest estimated


Table 4.6R+U: Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in

(rural + urban )Odisha

District


Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

in

clud

ing

(nr)

BARGARH 52 53 48 846 0 1000 3892 288

JHARSUGUDA 124 265 1 608 1 1000 1601 144

SAMBALPUR 182 67 18 719 14 1000 2520 192

DEOGARH 16 17 0 967 0 1000 746 96

SUNDARGARH 187 77 2 734 0 1000 4021 336

KEONJHAR 88 105 38 759 9 1000 3943 336

MAYURBHANJ 155 62 91 662 30 1000 5619 288

BALASORE 305 108 28 559 0 1000 4893 288

BHADRAK 180 168 92 560 0 1000 3008 240

KENDRAPARA 152 23 5 819 1 1000 2940 240

JAGATSINGHPUR 392 126 72 410 0 1000 2499 240

CUTTACK 242 81 39 638 0 1000 5580 384

JAJPUR 168 171 161 492 7 1000 3956 288

DHENKANAL 109 159 82 650 0 1000 2773 240

ANGUL 229 45 13 712 0 1000 2882 240

NAYAGARH 3 22 24 932 19 1000 2189 192

KHURDA 443 256 31 269 0 1000 4917 336

PURI 262 184 52 503 0 1000 3301 288

GANJAM 137 50 4 805 4 1000 7151 384

GAJAPATI 46 21 8 852 73 1000 1285 144

KANDHAMAL 136 18 37 703 106 1000 1620 136

BOUDH 110 46 9 834 0 1000 1116 144

SUBARNAPUR 27 88 26 859 0 1000 1383 144

BALANGIR 10 13 2 966 8 1000 4109 336

NUAPADA 163 13 0 824 0 1000 1297 144

KALAHANDI 60 166 5 721 48 1000 3975 288

RAYAGADA 49 110 1 700 140 1000 2384 192

NABARANGPUR 25 9 2 964 0 1000 2373 240

KORAPUT 126 121 8 687 57 1000 3591 216

MALKANGIRI 35 30 1 934 0 1000 1215 108

ODISHA 161 97 35 693 15 1000 92780 7132


Among districts in Odisha, Nayagarh (0.3%), Balangir (1%) and Deogarh (1.6%) had

the lowest and Khurda (44.3%), Jagatsinghpur (39.2%) and Balasore (30.5%) had the highest

proportion of households having exclusive accesses to their respective principal source of

drinking water. In case of community use of principal source of drinking water in Odisha,

Khurda (26.9%), Jagatsinghpur (41%) and Jajpur (49.2%) had the lowest and Deogarh (96.7%),

Balangir (96.6%) and Nabarangpur (96.4%) had the highest estimated proportion of

households.

4.2.3.1 protected (safe) and unprotected (unsafe) source of drinking water

The following section discusses on whether the principal source of drinking water used by the

households is safe or unsafe. Bottled water, Piped water into dwelling and piped water to

yard/plot, Public tap/standpipe, Tube well/borehole, Protected well/unprotected well,

Protected spring/unprotected spring, Rainwater collection, Surface water, Others (tanker-

truck, cart with small tank or drum, etc.) are some of the principal sources of drinking

water.

Protected well/unprotected well: A well is considered as protected if it has generally the

following protective measures to lower the risk of contamination:

1) A headwall around the well with a properly fitting cover

2) A concrete drainage platform around the well with a drainage channel

3) A handpump or bucket with windlass.

If instead of hand pump or bucket with windlass, electric pump is used to pump water from

such wells, where the conditions (1) and (2) exist, it will be considered as protected well.

A well is classified as unprotected dug well if either (i) the well is not protected from runoff

water, or (ii) the well is not protected from bird droppings and animals.

Protected spring/unprotected spring: A spring is considered protected, if it is protected from

runoff, bird droppings and animals by a "spring box", which is constructed of brick, masonry,

or concrete and is built around the spring so that water flows directly out of the box into a pipe

or cistern, without being exposed to outside pollution. A spring which is not protected is called

unprotected spring.

In this analysis, the ‘protected source’ of drinking water includes: ‘bottled water’, ‘piped water

into dwelling’, ‘piped water to yard/plot’, ‘public tap/standpipe’, ‘tube well/borehole’,

‘protected well’, ‘protected spring’, and ‘Others (tanker-truck, cart with small tank or drum,


etc.) . The ‘unprotected source’ of drinking water includes: unprotected well, unprotected

spring and surface water (tank/pond, river, dam, stream, canal, lake, etc.)

Table 4.7R: Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of

drinking water (Rural Odisha)

District Source type Estimated

(00)

households

Sample

households Protected

water (safe)

Unprotected

water(unsafe)

All incl nr

BARGARH 925 63 1000 3399 192

JHARSUGUDA 197 803 1000 768 48

SAMBALPUR 770 230 1000 1735 96

DEOGARH 181 819 1000 683 48

SUNDARGARH 744 256 1000 2718 192

KEONJHAR 868 132 1000 3498 240

MAYURBHANJ 543 457 1000 5251 240

BALASORE 993 7 1000 4112 240

BHADRAK 952 48 1000 2653 192

KENDRAPARA 1000 0 1000 2770 192

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 1000 2298 144

CUTTACK 703 297 1000 3932 240

JAJPUR 781 219 1000 3761 240

DHENKANAL 431 569 1000 2528 192

ANGUL 930 70 1000 2533 144

NAYAGARH 733 267 1000 2087 144

KHURDA 649 351 1000 2202 192

PURI 952 48 1000 2788 240

GANJAM 934 66 1000 5931 288

GAJAPATI 485 515 1000 1167 96

KANDHAMAL 276 724 1000 1524 88

BOUDH 859 141 1000 1079 96

SUBARNAPUR 853 147 1000 1289 96

BALANGIR 979 21 1000 3676 240

NUAPADA 914 86 1000 1241 96

KALAHANDI 911 89 1000 3708 240

RAYAGADA 872 128 1000 2088 144

NABARANGPUR 1000 0 1000 2221 192

KORAPUT 787 213 1000 3044 168

MALKANGIRI* 1000 0 1000 1119 60

ODISHA 815 185 1000 77802 5020


Table 4.7 R shows 81.5 percent households in rural Odisha had protected (safe)

drinking water. Also maximum number of districts are with more than 80 percent households

with safe drinking water but three districts Deogarh , Jharsuguda and Kandhamal are having

lowest proportion of households (less than 30%) are having protected(safe) drinking water.

Table 4.7U : Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of drinking water

(Urban Odisha)

District

Source type

Estimated

(00)

households

Sample

households Protected water

(safe)

Unprotected

water (unsafe)

All incl nr

BARGARH 989 11 1000 493 96

JHARSUGUDA 971 29 1000 833 96

SAMBALPUR 1000 0 1000 785 96

DEOGARH 952 48 1000 63 48

SUNDARGARH 1000 0 1000 1303 144

KEONJHAR 832 168 1000 445 96

MAYURBHANJ 1000 0 1000 368 48

BALASORE 1000 0 1000 781 48

BHADRAK 1000 0 1000 355 48

KENDRAPARA 982 18 1000 170 48

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 1000 201 96

CUTTACK 803 197 1000 1648 144

JAJPUR 1000 0 1000 195 48

DHENKANAL 850 150 1000 245 48

ANGUL 1000 0 1000 350 96

NAYAGARH 720 280 1000 102 48

KHURDA 991 9 1000 2715 144

PURI 1000 0 1000 513 48

GANJAM 859 141 1000 1220 96

GAJAPATI 920 80 1000 119 48

KANDHAMAL 772 228 1000 97 48

BOUDH 1000 0 1000 37 48

SUBARNAPUR 1000 0 1000 93 48

BALANGIR 1000 0 1000 433 96

NUAPADA 1000 0 1000 56 48

KALAHANDI 851 149 1000 267 48

RAYAGADA 1000 0 1000 296 48

NABARANGPUR 1000 0 1000 152 48

KORAPUT 1000 0 1000 548 48

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 1000 96 48

ODISHA 949 51 1000 14979 2112

Table 4.7 U shows that 94.9 percent households in urban Odisha had protected (safe)

drinking water. Also maximum number of districts are with more than 90 percent households


with safe drinking water. But Nayagarh (72percent), Kandhamal (77.2 percent) and Cuttack

(80.3 percent) are having lowest proportion of households are having protected (safe) drinking

water.

Table 4.7R+U: Per 1000 distribution of households by protected/unprotected principals source of drinking

water (Rural + Urban Odisha)

District

Source type

Estimated (00)

households

Sample

households Protected

water (safe)

Unprotected

water (unsafe)

All incl nr

BARGARH 930 59 1000 3892 288

JHARSUGUDA 664 336 1000 1601 144

SAMBALPUR 847 153 1000 2520 192

DEOGARH 246 754 1000 746 96

SUNDARGARH 836 164 1000 4021 336

KEONJHAR 864 136 1000 3943 336

MAYURBHANJ 582 418 1000 5619 288

BALASORE 994 6 1000 4893 288

BHADRAK 958 42 1000 3008 240

KENDRAPARA 999 1 1000 2940 240

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 1000 2499 240

CUTTACK 728 272 1000 5580 384

JAJPUR 789 211 1000 3956 288

DHENKANAL 453 547 1000 2773 240

ANGUL 937 63 1000 2882 240

NAYAGARH 733 267 1000 2189 192

KHURDA 821 179 1000 4917 336

PURI 958 42 1000 3301 288

GANJAM 922 78 1000 7151 384

GAJAPATI 523 477 1000 1285 144

KANDHAMAL 304 696 1000 1620 136

BOUDH 862 138 1000 1116 144

SUBARNAPUR 863 137 1000 1383 144

BALANGIR 981 19 1000 4109 336

NUAPADA 917 83 1000 1297 144

KALAHANDI 908 92 1000 3975 288

RAYAGADA 885 115 1000 2384 192

NABARANGPUR 1000 0 1000 2373 240

KORAPUT 803 197 1000 3591 216

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 1000 1215 108

ODISHA 834 165 1000 92780 7132


Table 4.7R+U shows that during 2012, 83.4 percent households in Odisha had protected

(safe) drinking water .Among 30 districts of Odisha, Jagatsinghpur, Nabarangpur and

Malkangiri had the highest (100 percent) and Deogarh (24.6 percent), Kandhamal (30.4

percent) Dhenkanal (45.3 percent), had the lowest proportion of households having protected

(safe) drinking water.

4.3 Bathroom and sanitation facility

In this survey, for collecting information on bathroom facilities available to the

members of the household, two categories of bathroom were recorded viz., attached bathroom

and detached bathroom. If the dwelling unit had one or more bathrooms attached to the

dwelling unit (i.e., with direct access from its rooms, veranda or corridor), it was considered to

have an attached bathroom. Otherwise, a bathroom within the premises but not attached to the

dwelling units, was classified as a detached bathroom.

4.3.1 State level Bathroom facility

Table 4.8 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom

Facility of bathroom No of Households

Sector

Attached Detached

No

bathroom All

Estimated

(00) Sample

(incl nr)

Rural Odisha 32 83 885 1000 77802 5020

Urban Odisha 410 271 319 1000 14979 2112

Rural + Urban

Odisha 93 113 794 1000 92780 7132


Table 4.8 presents Number per 1000 households by facility of bathroom for each

sector of Odisha during 2012. The table depicts that, more number of households (41percent)

belonging to urban Odisha had attached bathroom as compared to households belonging to

rural Odisha (3.2 percent). Similarly figure 4.5 shows, higher proportion of households (88.5

percent) in the rural areas did not have any bathroom as compared to urban areas (31.9 percent)

and this comparison reveals a wide gap between rural and urban Odisha in respect of bathroom

facilities.

4.3.2 Comparison of households without bathroom in Odisha and India

62.3

88.5

16.7

31.9

India Odisha India Odisha

Rural Urban

Figure 4.6: Sector wise percentage of households without bathroom during 2012 in India and Odisha

88.5

31.9

79.4


Figure 4.5: Percentage distribution of households without bathroom during 2012


Discussion in this section will primarily focus on the households without bathroom in

Odisha and India in 2012. Percentage of households without bathroom for India reported here

was taken form NSS report no. 556(69/1.2/1) published by NSSO. In order to find out the

variation between Odisha and India as a whole at a glance, the relevant figures have been

presented in the figure 4.6. It is clear from the chart that percentage of households without

bathroom in rural Odisha was (88.5%) more than that of all India average (62.3%).Same

phenomenon is also found in urban areas. Percentage of households without bathroom in urban

Odisha was (31.9%) more than that of all India average (16.7%)

4.3.3 Region level Bathroom facility

83.7

90 92.288.5

32.727.4

33.8 31.9

73.4

83.3 8279.4

Coastal Southern Northern All Coastal Southern Northern All Coastal Southern Northern All


Figure: 4.7 Percentage of households without bathroom facility for different regions of Odisha


Table-4.9 Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom

Region Attached Detached No

bathroom

All(incl

NR)

Estimated(00) Sample

Rural Odisha

Coastal 51 112 837 1000 26602 1824

Southern 12 87 900 1000 28082 1803

Northern 34 45 922 1000 23117 1393

All 32 83 885 1000 77802 5020

Urban Odisha

Coastal 360 312 327 1000 6681 673

Southern 446 280 274 1000 3412 671

Northern 453 209 338 1000 4885 768

All 410 271 319 1000 14979 2112

Odisha

Coastal 113 152 734 1000 33284 2497

Southern 59 108 833 1000 31494 2474

Northern 107 73 820 1000 28002 2161

All 93 113 794 1000 92780 7132

Table 4.9 presents Number per 1000 households by facility of bathroom for each region

of Odisha during 2012. The table depicts that, in rural Odisha more number of households

(5.1percent) of coastal region had attached bathroom as compared to households belonging to

northern (3.4 percent) and southern (1.2percent). In urban Odisha number households

(45.3percent) of northern region had attached bathroom as compared to households belonging

to southern (44.6 percent) and coastal (36percent). Similarly figure 4.7 shows, in rural Odisha

the percentage of households who had no bathroom facility was found more in the northern

region i.e. 92.2% while it was found lowest in the coastal region i.e. 83.7%. In urban Odisha

the percentage of households who had no bathroom facility was found more in the northern

region i.e. 33.8% while it was found lowest in the southern region of urban Odisha i.e. 27.4%.


4.3.4 District level Bathroom facility

Access to bathroom (rural Odisha):

Figure 4.8R: District wise percentage of households having bathroom facility in rural Odisha

In rural Odisha highest percentage of households of Khurda district had access to

bathroom facility i.e. 39.8%, followed by Cuttack and Kalahandi which come in the 20%-30%

range. Whereas, Deogarh, Malkangiri and Nawarangpur had the lowest proportion of

households which come in the 0-10 percent range. Further, if we compare the national average

with the districts of Odisha, we can see that for no bathroom facility except Khurda (60.2%)

all other districts of rural Odisha are above national average. During 2012 in rural Odisha, 3.2

percent households had attached bathroom. Among the districts in rural areas, Kendrapara

(14.9%), Sambalpur (8%), Angul (7%) had the highest proportion of households with attached

bathroom.


Access to bathroom (urban Odisha):

Figure 4.8U: District wise percentage of households having bathroom facility in urban

Odisha

In urban Odisha 9 districts like, Malkangiri, Koraput, Rayagada, Kalahandi,Ganjam,

Khurda, Kendrapara, Jajpur and Bargarh had the highest percentage of households (above

75%) who had access to bathroom facility. In districts like Deogarh, Subarnapur, Keonjhar had

the lowest proportion (less than 30%) of households who had bathroom facility. In urban sector,

two districts viz. Koraput (5.4%) and Malkangiri (10.3%) have less percentages of households

without bathroom than the national average (16.7%). In rural Odisha, 3.2 percent households

had attached bathroom. while the corresponding proportion of households in urban Odisha was

more than seventeen times (41.0 percent) .In urban areas, among all districts, Keonjhar (6.7

percent),Deogarh (10.5 percent),Balangir (12 percent) had the lowest proportion of households


with attached bathroom while Bargarh (65.2 percent) ,Rayagada (64.7 percent),Nuapada

(63.6percent) had the highest proportion of households with attached bathroom .The status of

bathroom facility is relatively better in urban areas and which is obvious.

Access to bathroom facility in rural + urban Odisha:

Figure 4.8R+U: District wise percentage of households having bathroom facility in( rural +

urban) Odisha.

In rural+urban Odisha 4 districts like, Khurda, Cuttack, Kalahandi, and Jharsuguda had

the highest percentage of households (above 30%) who had access to bathroom facility. In

districts like Deogarh, Subarnapur, Nabarangpur, Keonjhar, Kandhamal, Boudh, Balangir

Nuapada had the lowest proportion of households (less than 10%) who had access to bathroom

facility. During 2012 in Odisha, 9.3 percent households had attached bathroom. Among the 30

districts in Odisha, in Keonjhar(0.8%) ,Deogarh(0.9%), and Subarnapur (1.3%),

Balangir(1.3%) had the lowest proportion of households with attached bathroom while

Jharsuguda (28.8%) ,Khurda(26.4%), Sambalpur (19.8%) had the highest proportion of

households with attached bathroom .


4.4 Latrine facility

The sanitation facilities available to households is an important aspect of living

standards. In the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund’s Global

Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report, sanitation was defined to include

connection to a sewer or septic tank system, pour-flush latrine, simple pit or ventilated

improved pit latrine, with allowance for acceptable local technologies. The excreta disposal

system was considered adequate if it was private or shared (but not public) and if it hygienically

separated human excreta from human contact. Information on the types of latrines and

households’ use of latrine facilities collected in this survey include ‘type of latrines available

to the households’, ‘type of use of latrine’ etc. .In this survey, ‘access to latrine’ was defined

in relation to the latrine that could be used by the majority of the household members,

irrespective of whether it was being used or not. Information was collected on whether the

household’s latrine facility was for its exclusive use or was shared with one or more households

in the building, or whether households had to use public/community latrine with and without

payment, or whether the household did not have access to any latrine at all.

4.4.1 State level Latrine facilities

4.4.2 Access to Latrine

81

20.1

71.2


F i g u r e 4 . 9 : p e r c e n t a g e o f h o u s e h o l d s w i t h o u t l a t r i n e d u r i n g 2 0 1 2


Table 4.10: Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in

Odisha

Access to latrine

Sector

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building

Others

No

Latrine

All

including

nr

No of households

Estimated(00) sample

Rural

Odisha

146 41 2 810 1000 77802 5020

Urban

Odisha

537 255 6 201 1000 14979 2112

(Rural +

Urban)

Odisha

209 75 3 712 1000 92780 7132

Table 4.10 presents number per 1000 households by access to latrine for each sector of

Odisha during 2012. Considering access of latrine at the household level, the survey depicts

that households having exclusive access had significant difference as one compare between

rural and urban area. In rural areas 14.6 percent of households had exclusive access to latrine

as compared to 53.7 percent of households in urban areas. Figure 4.9 shows the percentage of

households without ‘latrine’ in rural and urban area during 2012. It reveals a wide gap between

rural and urban Odisha in respect of latrine facilities. In rural Odisha 81 percent households

did not have latrine whereas 20.1 percent households of urban Odisha did not have latrine in

2012.

4.4.3 Type of latrine

In rural Odisha 80.1% households who have access to latrine facility used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine while for urban Odisha this figure is 95.7%. Information

collected from the survey depicts that, households who have access to latrine but were not using

the same is negligible in Urban Odisha i.e. 0.2%.Whereas in rural Odisha 7.8% households

have access to latrine but did not use it. The results are reflected in table 4.11 and figure 4.10


Table 4.11: Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine.

Sector

Type of latrine for those households who have

access to latrine

Number of

Households having

access to latrine

Used

Not

used

All

including

nr

Flush/pour-flush to Other

latrine Piped

sewer

system/

septic

tank/pit

Else

where

Estimated

(00)

Sample

Rural Odisha 801 0 113 78 1000 14734 890

Urban Odisha 957 0 32 2 1000 11959 1342

Rural + Urban

Odisha

867 0 79 46 1000 26693 2232

80.1

95.786.7

11.3

3.2

7.9

7.8 0.2 4.6

R U R A L O D I S H A U R B A N O D I S H A R U R A L + U R B A N O D I S H A

F I G U R E 4 . 1 0 : P E R C E N T A G E D I S T R I B U T I O N O F H O U S E H O L D S H A V I N G A C C E S S T O L A T R I N E B Y T Y P E O F L A T R I N E .

piped sewer system/ septic tank/pit Other latrine Not used


Reason for not using latrine

Table 4.12: Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine but not using it by

reason for not using latrine

Sector No super-

structure

Not

clean/

insuffici

ent water

Malfunctio

ning of the

latrine

Personal

preference

Cannot

afford

charges of

paid

latrine

Others All

Rural 98 56 508 286 0 52 1000

Urban 0 0 749 0 0 251 1000

Rural + Urban 96 55 512 281 0 55 1000

Some households do not use latrine inpsite of having access to latrine. In the 69th round

survey information was collected on the reasons of not using latrine by household members. It

was found that in rural Odisha about 51percent households’ reason of not using latrine was

malfunctioning of latrine and in urban Odisha 74.9 percent household’s reason of not using

latrine was malfunctioning of latrine. In rural Odisha 4.1percent households had access to

latrine but do not use it whereas only 1 percent urban household had access to latrine but do

not use it.

Rural, 4.1

Urban, 1

Rural + Urban, 2.3

Figure: 4.11 Percentage of households having access to latrine but not using it


4.4.4 Comparison of households without latrine between Odisha and India.

Discussion in this section will primarily focus on the households without latrine in

Odisha and India in 2012. Percentage of households without latrine for India reported here was

taken form NSS report no. 556(69/1.2/1) published by NSSO. In order to find out the variation

between Odisha and India as a whole at a glance, the relevant figures have been presented in

the figure 4.12. It is clear from the chart that percentage of households without latrine in rural

Odisha was (81%) more than that of all India average (59.4%). Same phenomenon is also found

in urban areas. Percentage of households without latrine in urban Odisha was (20.1%) more

than that of all India average (8.8%).

59.4

81

8.8

20.1

India Odisha India Odisha

Rural Urban

Figure 4.12: Sector wise percentage of households without latrine during 2012 in India and Odisha


4.4.1 Region level Latrine facilities

Table 4.13 : Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine

Region Access to latrine Estimated

(00)

households

Sample

households Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in the

building

Others No

Latrine

All

including

NR

Rural Odisha

Coastal 199 43 4 753 1000 26602 1824

Southern 98 58 1 843 1000 28082 1803

Northern 144 18 2 836 1000 23117 1393

All 146 41 2 810 1000 77802 5020

Urban Odisha

Coastal 482 336 6 175 1000 6681 673

Southern 712 120 12 157 1000 3412 671

Northern 492 240 1 267 1000 4885 768

All 537 255 6 201 1000 14979 2112

Odisha

Coastal 256 101 5 637 1000 33284 2497

Southern 165 64 2 768 1000 31494 2474

Northern 204 57 2 737 1000 28002 2161

All 209 75 3 712 1000 92780 7132

Table 4.13 presents number per 1000 households by access to latrine for each region of Odisha

during 2012. The survey depicts that 19.9% households of the coastal region of rural Odisha

had exclusive access of latrine at the household level. Whereas in northern region of rural areas

14.4 percent of households had exclusive access to latrine as compared to 9.8 percent of

households in southern region. Figure shows the percentage of households without ‘latrine’

for each region of rural and urban areas during 2012. In southern region of rural Odisha 84.3

percent households did not have latrine facility whereas 83.6 percent households of northern

and 75.3percent households of coastal regions did not have latrine in 2012. In northern region

of urban Odisha 26.7 percent households did not have latrine facility whereas 17.5 percent

households of coastal region and 15.7percent households of southern region did not have latrine

in 2012.


District level Latrine facilities

Facility of exclusive access to latrine:

Table 4.14: Households (per thousand) having facility of exclusive access to latrine

District Rural Odisha Urban Odisha Odisha

Central

Sample

State

sample

Pooled

sample

Central

Sample

State

sample

Pooled

sample

Central

Sample

State

sample

Pooled

sample

Bargarh 73 193 132 780 596 659 131 264 199

Jharsuguda 0 22 11 354 346 347 215 151 186

Sambalpur 148 48 103 538 644 604 289 239 259

Deogarh 0 158 78 358 529 443 30 189 109

Sundargarh 67 144 103 540 322 482 248 196 226

Keonjhar 89 68 79 210 368 310 99 113 105

Mayurbhanj 98 211 155 433 770 543 127 235 180

Balasore 175 368 267 496 423 442 203 380 295

Bhadrak 49 161 104 264 364 314 74 186 129

Kendrapara 192 294 242 283 596 378 199 305 250

Jagatsinghpur 260 166 212 232 692 518 258 214 236

Cuttack 217 248 230 472 415 442 281 307 293

Jajpur 136 131 134 655 587 614 155 160 157

Dhenkanal 76 236 150 377 95 183 92 218 153

Angul 206 481 347 871 699 785 269 515 400

Nayagarh 153 102 127 442 494 465 168 118 143

Khurda 154 424 292 349 639 526 253 552 421

Puri 73 252 164 149 749 526 82 344 221

Ganjam 274 226 251 873 793 830 366 333 350

Gajapati 282 89 192 637 214 428 314 101 214

Kandhamal 45 8 24 914 614 735 94 46 66

Boudh 60 0 31 641 742 711 71 35 53

Subarnapur 6 36 21 281 263 272 25 51 38

Balangir 87 57 72 400 314 349 117 91 101

Nuapada 37 87 61 413 742 585 52 119 83

Kalahandi 153 35 106 756 780 769 184 103 150

Rayagada 45 24 35 651 669 660 116 109 113

Nabarangpur 14 0 8 594 793 711 43 64 53

Koraput 6 87 42 925 882 895 87 264 172

Malkangiri 0 0 0 530 719 626 45 53 49

Odisha 124 170 146 496 561 537 180 241 209


During 2012, 14.6 percent households in rural Odisha and 53.7 percent households of

urban Odisha had exclusive use of latrine facilities. Among rural areas of districts, Angul (34.7

percent), Khurda (29.2percent) and Balasore (26.7 percent) had the highest and, Malkangiri (0

percent), Nabarangpur (8 percent) and Jharsuguda (11 percent) had the lowest proportion of

households having exclusive use of latrine facilities. In urban Odisha Koraput (89.5%), Ganjam

(83%), Angul (78.5%) had the highest proportion of households who had exclusive access to

latrine facilities.

District level Latrine facilities in rural Odisha

Figure 4.13R: District wise households (per thousand) with latrine facility in rural Odisha

In rural Odisha 4 districts like, Khurda, Cuttack, Angul and Balasore had the highest

percentage of households (above 30%) who had access to latrine facility. Districts like

Malkangiri, Deogarh, Nabarangpur, Keonjhar, Kandhamal, Boudh, Balangir, Nuapada and

Jharsuguda had the lowest proportion of households (less than 10%) who had access to latrine

facility.


District level Latrine facilities in urban Odisha

Figure 4.13U: District wise households (per thousand) with latrine facility in rural Odisha

In urban Odisha 13 districts like, Ganjam, Kandhamal, Koraput, Khurda, Jajpur,

Malkangiri, Angul, Dhenkanal, Rayagada, Bargarh, Cuttack, Kalahandi and Nabarangpur had

the highest percentage of households (above 80%) who had access to latrine facility. Districts

like, Subarnapur, Keonjhar, and Balangir had the lowest proportion of households (less than

50%) who had access to latrine facility.


Type of latrine (rural Odisha):

Table 4.15R: Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in rural Odisha

District

Type of latrine for those households who have

access to latrine

Number of

Households having

access to latrine

Used

No

t u

sed

All

incl

ud

ing

nr

Flush/pour-flush to

Other

latrine

Piped sewer

system/ septic

tank/pit

Else where Estimated

(00)

Sample

BARGARH 893 0 0 107 1000 499 36

JHARSUGUDA 0 0 0 0 0 8 3

SAMBALPUR 900 0 0 100 1000 206 13

DEOGARH 0 0 0 1000 1000 53 4

SUNDARGARH 908 0 0 92 1000 312 35

KEONJHAR 251 0 0 749 1000 281 25

MAYURBHANJA 736 0 0 264 1000 955 49

BALASORE 537 0 263 166 1000 1271 83

BHADRAK 975 0 25 0 1000 358 34

KENDRAPARA 940 0 0 60 1000 689 48

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 521 26

CUTTACK 971 0 0 0 1000 1254 61

JAJPUR 491 0 489 0 1000 729 43

DHENKANAL 745 0 255 0 1000 564 28

ANGUL 1000 0 0 0 1000 902 40

NAYAGARH 983 0 0 17 1000 306 20

KHURDA 896 0 71 0 1000 861 59

PURI 800 0 157 0 1000 567 46

GANJAM 578 0 404 18 1000 1630 60

GAJAPATI 636 0 302 62 1000 224 17

KANDHAMAL 1000 0 0 0 1000 36 5

BOUDH 1000 0 0 0 1000 69 6

SUBARNAPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 130 7

BALANGIR 705 0 0 295 1000 325 39

NUAPADA 1000 0 0 0 1000 102 11

KALAHANDI 943 0 0 57 1000 1077 57

RAYAGADA 1000 0 0 0 1000 215 7

NABARANGPUR 810 0 0 190 1000 38 6

KORAPUT 1000 0 0 0 1000 552 22

ODISHA 801 0 113 78 1000 14734 890

In rural Odisha 80.1% households who have access to latrine facility used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine .100 percent households of Koraput, Rayagada, Nuapada,

Subarnapur, Boudh, Kandhamal ,Angul and Jagatsinghpur used piped sewer system/septic

tank/pit type latrine .


Table 4.15 U : Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in

Urban Odisha

District

Type of latrine for those households who have access to latrine

Number of Households

having access to latrine Used

Not used

All

including

nr Flush/pour-flush to

Other latrine Piped sewer

system/

septic

tank/pit

Else

where

Estimated

(00)

Sample

BARGARH 1000 0 0 0 1000 412 59

JHARSUGUDA 1000 0 0 0 1000 654 46

SAMBALPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 608 59

DEOGARH 1000 0 0 0 1000 36 31

SUNDARGARH 1000 0 0 0 1000 884 81

KEONJHAR 958 0 42 0 1000 192 36

MAYURBHANJ 1000 0 0 0 1000 277 37

BALASORE 1000 0 0 0 1000 543 27

BHADRAK 1000 0 0 0 1000 213 27

KENDRAPARA 987 0 0 0 1000 130 36

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 159 56

CUTTACK 737 0 182 0 1000 1361 80

JAJPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 176 37

DHENKANAL 627 0 373 0 1000 205 38

ANGUL 1000 0 0 0 1000 311 47

NAYAGARH 977 0 23 0 1000 52 23

KHURDA 1000 0 0 0 1000 2488 106

PURI 1000 0 0 0 1000 384 35

GANJAM 908 0 78 14 1000 1193 92

GAJAPATI 1000 0 0 0 1000 76 34

KANDHAMAL 1000 0 0 0 1000 94 45

BOUDH 1000 0 0 0 1000 28 30

SUBARNAPUR 841 0 0 159 1000 28 17

BALANGIR 967 0 33 0 1000 219 57

NUAPADA 899 101 0 0 1000 43 25

KALAHANDI 1000 0 0 0 1000 215 37

RAYAGADA 1000 0 0 0 1000 247 34

NABARANGPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 122 33

KORAPUT 1000 0 0 0 1000 524 41

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 0 0 1000 86 36

ODISHA 957 0 32 2 1000 11959 1342

In urban Odisha 95.7% households who have access to latrine facility used

piped sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine .100 percent households of 21 districts in urban

areas used piped sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine .


Table 4.15R+U : Per 1000 distribution of households having access to latrine by type of latrine in Odisha

District

Type of latrine for those households who have access to latrine

Number of Households

having access to latrine

Used

Not used

All

including

N R

Flush/pour-flush to Other latrine

Piped sewar

system/ septic

tank/pit

Else where

Estimated(00)

Sample

BARGARH 938 0 0 62 1000 910 95

JHARSUGUDA 1000 0 0 0 1000 663 49

SAMBALPUR 967 0 0 33 1000 814 72

DEOGARH 201 0 0 799 1000 89 35

SUNDARGARH 985 0 0 15 1000 1196 116

KEONJHAR 424 0 10 565 1000 473 61

MAYURBHANJ 817 0 0 183 1000 1231 86

BALASORE 613 0 220 139 1000 1814 110

BHADRAK 986 0 14 0 1000 571 61

KENDRAPARA 950 0 0 47 1000 819 84

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 0 0 1000 680 82

CUTTACK 844 0 99 0 1000 2615 141

JAJPUR 578 0 405 0 1000 904 80

DHENKANAL 730 0 270 0 1000 769 66

ANGUL 1000 0 0 0 1000 1214 87

NAYAGARH 983 0 3 14 1000 358 43

KHURDA 980 0 14 0 1000 3349 165

PURI 887 0 89 0 1000 951 81

GANJAM 709 0 275 16 1000 2823 152

GAJAPATI 698 0 251 51 1000 300 51

KANDHAMAL 1000 0 0 0 1000 130 50

BOUDH 1000 0 0 0 1000 97 36

SUBARNAPUR 979 0 0 21 1000 159 24

BALANGIR 791 0 11 197 1000 544 96

NUAPADA 976 24 0 0 1000 145 36

KALAHANDI 948 0 0 52 1000 1292 94

RAYAGADA 1000 0 0 0 1000 462 41

NABARANGPUR 944 0 0 56 1000 160 39

KORAPUT 1000 0 0 0 1000 1076 63

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 0 0 1000 86 36

ODISHA 867 0 79 46 1000 26693 2232


In Odisha 86.7% households who have access to latrine facility used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine .100 percent households of Malkangiri, Koraput, Rayagada,

Boudh, Kandhamal, Angul, Jagatsinghpur and Jharsuguda districts used piped sewer

system/septic tank/pit type latrine .


Chapter Five

HOUSING CONDITION

5.1 Introduction

Housing condition of the people is one of the important indicators of the socio-

economic development of the country. Housing characteristics and the environment, in which

the dwelling unit is located, are two important facets of condition of living of a household.

Housing characteristics includes ‘type of structure of the dwelling unit’, ‘use of the house’,

‘condition of structure’, ‘type of dwelling unit’, etc. some important issues relating to housing

characteristics of the household have been discussed. In general, the following discussion

covers only those households which lived in a house.

5.2 Housing characteristics

The first important characteristic of housing condition of a household is the type of structure

of its house. In NSS 69th round survey, type of structures of the dwelling unit of households

was categorised as pucca, semi-pucca and katcha, the last one, i.e. katcha, being further split

into two categories: serviceable katcha and unserviceable katcha. The structure type

classification was on the basis of materials used in the construction of roof and wall of the

dwelling unit. A ‘pucca structure’ was one whose walls and roofs were made of materials such

as cement, concrete, oven burnt bricks, hollow cement / ash bricks, stone, stone blocks, jack

boards (cement plastered reeds), iron, zinc or other metal sheets, timber, tiles, slate, corrugated

iron, asbestos cement sheet, veneer, plywood, artificial wood of synthetic material and poly

vinyl chloride (PVC) material. A structure which had walls and roof made of non-pucca

materials was regarded as a katcha structure where unburnt bricks, bamboo, mud, grass, leaves,

reeds, thatch, etc were considered as ‘non-pucca’ materials. All the other type of structures was

considered as ‘semi-pucca’ structure.


5.2 State Level Results

Table no -5.1 Average Household size and Average floor area of the dwelling.

Sector Average Household Size Average .Floor Area (0.00 sq.

metre) of the dwelling units

Rural 4.3 34.62

Urban 3.9 43.58

Combined 4.2 36.07

It is observed from table5.1, that average household size in rural Odisha during 2012 was 4.3,

where for urban it was 3.9 .similarly average floor area of the dwelling unit for urban

households was 43.58 square metres, for rural households it was 34.62 square metres and for

all Odisha it was 36.07 square metres respectively.

Table no -5.2 Sector wise per 1000 distribution of households with type of structure in

Odisha according to centre, State and pooled result.

Type

of Structure

Rural Urban

Centre State Pooled Centre State Pooled

Pucca 350 387 333 797 708 755

Semi-Pucca 362 265 323 147 197 169

Katcha 288 348 344 56 94 76

In Rural Odisha 34.4 percent households used to live in house with katcha structure,

where in urban only 7.6 percent households lived in katcha structure.

In rural Odisha 65.6 percent households lived in a house either pucca or semi-pucca

type structure, for urban Odisha it was 92.4 percent, according to pooled result.

5.2.1 Condition of structure

The information on physical condition of the structure of a building was collected during the

survey. Three types of condition of structure were considered viz. (i) good, (ii) satisfactory,

and (iii) bad. If the structure did not require any immediate repairs, major or minor, it was

considered as in ‘good’ condition whereas if the structure required immediate minor repairs


but not major repairs, it was considered as in ‘satisfactory’ condition. If the structure of the

building required immediate major repairs without which it might be unsafe for habitation or

required to be demolished and rebuilt, it was considered as in ‘bad’ condition. Table 5.3 shows

per 1000 distribution of households by condition of structure for different structure types in

Odisha during 2012.

Table-5.3 per 1000 distribution of households by condition of structure for different structure types.

Type

of Structure

Pooled State Central

Condition of the Structure Condition of the Structure Condition of the Structure

Good Satisfac

tory

Bad Good Satisfac

tory

Bad Good Satisfact

ory

Bad

Rural

Pucca 538 418 44 504 449 47 542 415 43

Semi Pucca 151 678 171 154 639 207 144 689 167

Katcha 51 437 511 45 362 593 67 544 389

Urban

Pucca 645 331 24 610 347 43 647 339 14

Semi Pucca 164 659 177 204 649 147 102 663 235

Katcha 45 290 665 43 227 730 50 375 574

According to pooled result 51.1 percent rural households and 66.5 urban households

with ‘katcha’ structure type had lived in a house with ‘bad’ condition, in Odisha during

2012.

Very negligible 4.4 percent rural households and 2.4 percent urban households with

“Pucca” structure lived in a house with ‘bad’ condition.

5.2.2 Tenurial status of dwelling

Information in respect of the tenurial status of the dwelling unit was collected during the

survey.


Table No-5.4 Sector wise per 1000 distribution of households according to tenurial

status of the dwelling in Odisha.

Sector Central State Pooled

Owned Hired Others Owned Hired Others Owned Hired Others

Rural 916 53 31 980 9 11 947 32 22

Urban 433 528 39 637 312 50 545 413 42

Combined

(Rural+ Urban)

843 124 32 918 64 18 882 93 25

94.7 percent rural households and 54.5 percent urban households had lived in

‘Own’ dwelling unit.

41.3 percent urban households had lived in ‘Hired’ dwelling unit, where in case

of rural it was 3.2 percent only.

At all Odisha level 88.2 percent households had lived in ‘Own’ dwelling unit,

where only 9.2 percent households had lived in ‘Hired’ dwelling unit.

Very negligible 2.2 percent in rural Odisha and 4.2 percent in urban Odisha,

households had lived in dwelling unit as ‘Others’.

5.2.3 Ventilation in dwelling

In this survey, information on ventilation of the dwelling unit was collected. Ventilation in

dwelling unit is an important aspect of health of the dwellers. The status of the ventilation of

dwelling unit was also ascertained in this survey. It was ascertained from the subjective

judgement of the respondent whether the ventilation of the dwelling unit is ‘good’ or

‘satisfactory’ or ‘bad’. By ventilation it was meant the extent to which the rooms are open

to air and light.


Table- 5.5 Per 1000 households with type of ventilation of the dwelling units for

different structure types in Odisha during 2012.

Structure

Type


Good Satisfactory Good Satisfactory Good Satisfactory

Pucca 317 480 502 376 373 448

Semi Pucca 81 499 161 496 88 499

Katcha 21 328 11 260 21 325

All 139 434 407 387 182 426

34.9 percent rural households and 27.1 percent urban households had lived in a house

with katcha type of structure having either good or satisfactory ventilation in the

dwelling unit.

In rural and urban Odisha ventilation of dwelling unit gradually worsen from structure

type pucca to semi-pucca & katcha.

39.2 percent households in Odisha had lived with ‘bad’ ventilation in their dwelling

unit considering all structure type.

Problems of flies/mosquitoes

In this survey, information was collected on problem of flies/mosquitoes faced by the

households during last 365 days. The problem was categorised as ‘severe’ when it generally

disturbed the normal way of life of the household members, like taking rest, reading,

performing household chores, etc. Otherwise, the problem was classified as ‘moderate’.

Besides, it was ascertained whether any measure such as spraying chemicals, fogging, etc. was

taken by local bodies/state governments or by the household itself to tackle the problems of

flies/mosquitoes. A household might take measures like fixing net in the windows, preventing

water from accumulating in the surroundings, using smoke, using mosquito repellents, etc.


Table 5.6 : Proportion (per 1000) of households reporting (i) problem of flies/mosquitoes during

last 365 days, (ii) that effort was made by local bodies/state government/households during last

365 days to tackle problem of flies/mosquitoes

Sector

Number per 1000 households reporting

Problem of flies/mosquitoes To tackle the problame any

effort was made by

Severe Moderate Local bodies

/State Govt.

Household

Rural 502 474 93 756

Urban 526 470 437 930

Rural + Urban 506 474 150 785

The survey estimated that 50.2 percent rural households and 52.6 percent urban

households had reported that they faced ‘severe’ problems of flies/mosquitoes during last 365

days .For 47.4 percent rural households and 47 percent urban households the problem of

flies/mosquitoes was reported to be ‘moderate’. It was observed that the effort at local

body/state government level to tackle the problems of flies/mosquitoes was more prominent in

urban areas than rural areas. In urban areas, whereas 43.7 percent households had reported that

local bodies/state governments had taken some effort to tackle the problems of

flies/mosquitoes; the same proportion was estimated for rural areas at only 9.3 percent. In rural

areas and urban areas, households had to take main role in tackling the problems of

flies/mosquitoes. The survey estimates that in rural areas 75.6 percent households and in urban

areas 93 percent households had taken some effort to tackle the problems of flies/mosquitoes

by themselves.

Electricity for domestic use

Electricity is an important facility to households and has a bearing on the quality of life

of the population. In this survey, information was collected on availability of electricity to

households for domestic use. Besides, for the households that had electricity for domestic use,

data on the type of electrical wiring were also collected. Among different type of electrical

wirings, the survey covered ‘conduit’, ‘fixed to the walls’ and ‘temporary’ wirings.


Figure 5.1 shows

percentage of households who

had electricity for domestic use

during 2012. It is observed that

during 2012, 74.2 percent and

96.4 percent of households in

rural and urban Odisha

respectively had electricity for

domestic use.

5.3 Region Level Results

Table- 5.7 Region wise per thousand distribution by structure type and average floor area

for household

Name of the

Region

Rural Urban

Pucca Semi-

Pucca

Katcha Average

Floor area

Pucca Semi-

Pucca

Katcha Average

Floor

area

COASTAL 431 160 409 37.72 806 128 66 45.85

SOUTHERN 317 388 295 29.88 760 184 56 39.66

NORTHERN 240 430 330 36.81 682 214 104 43.18

All ODISHA 333 323 344 34.62 755 169 76 43.57

Figure No-5.2

43.131.7

24.033.3

16.0 38.843.0

32.3

40.929.5 33.0 34.4

37.7229.88

36.81 34.62

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

COASTAL SOUTHERN NORTHERN All ODISHA

Region wise percentage distribution of households according to

type of structure and average floor area in Rural Odisha.

Pucca Semi-Pucca Katcha Avg Floor area

Rural, 74.2

Urban, 96.4

Rural + Urban, 77.9

Figure 5.1: Percentage of households having electricity for domestic use in Odisha


Figure No-5.3

Odisha divided into three NSS regions namely, Coastal region (comprising of nine

number of districts), Southern region (comprising of twelve number of districts) and Northern

region (comprising of nine number of districts).

70.5 percent rural households belongs to southern region had lived in a house

either pucca or semi-pucca structure, which was more than the all Odisha level

(65.6 %).

40.9 percent rural households belongs to coastal region had lived in a house

with katchha structure, which was more than the all Odisha level (34.4 %).

80.6 percent urban households belongs to southern region had lived in a house

with pucca structure, which was more than the all Odisha level (75.5 %).

Percentage share of urban households, who had lived in a house with katchha

structure found more in northern region (10.4), compare to other two region and

all Odisha (7.6).

80.676.0

68.2

75.5

12.8 18.421.4

16.9

6.6 5.6 10.4 7.6

45.8539.66

43.18 43.57

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

COASTAL SOUTHERN NORTHERN All ODISHA

Region wise percentage distribution of households according to type of structure and

average floor area in Urban Odisha.

Pucca Semi-Pucca Katcha Avg Floor area


5.3 District Level Results

Table- 5.8: District wise percentage distribution of households according to type of

structure in rural Odisha.

Name of the District Central State Pooled

Type of Structure Type of Structure Type of Structure

Pucca Semi-

Pucca

Katcha Pucca Semi-

Pucca

Katcha Pucca Semi-

Pucca

Katcha

BARGARH 28.2 52.6 19.1 35.9 28.3 35.8 27.8 42.3 29.9

JHARSUGUDA 20.7 74.4 4.8 29.1 70.5 0.3 14.4 83.1 2.5

SAMBALPUR 19.5 65.4 15.2 26.7 69.8 3.5 14.9 75.1 10.0

DEOGARH 3.7 75.9 20.4 8.7 43.3 48.0 4.5 60.0 35.4

SUNDARGARH 16.9 83.1 0.0 25.9 32.0 42.1 18.1 58.9 23.0

KEONJHAR 16.6 65.1 18.4 22.7 14.2 63.1 19.8 40.1 40.0

MAYURBHANJ 10.9 46.6 42.4 24.7 35.4 39.9 16.4 41.6 42.0

BALASORE 23.5 34.5 42.0 43.7 23.1 33.1 28.5 30.4 41.1

BHADRAK 24.6 17.3 58.1 28.4 10.3 61.3 23.8 14.6 61.6

KENDRAPARA 31.9 7.4 60.7 34.8 9.9 55.3 32.1 8.8 59.1

JAGATSINGHPUR 58.9 9.0 32.1 44.3 5.7 50.0 49.9 7.1 43.0

CUTTACK 53.3 17.3 29.4 54.5 32.2 13.2 54.4 20.4 25.3

JAJPUR 41.6 11.3 47.1 60.5 7.7 31.8 49.8 9.8 40.4

DHENKANAL 44.1 15.9 40.0 52.5 12.1 35.4 44.9 14.9 40.2

ANGUL 55.4 7.7 36.9 34.0 34.4 31.6 40.7 22.9 36.4

NAYAGARH 40.9 9.4 49.7 40.5 21.1 38.4 39.7 15.5 44.8

KHURDA 53.4 14.2 32.4 81.9 10.9 7.2 56.9 19.0 24.1

PURI 47.0 10.3 42.8 60.3 15.7 24.0 54.8 10.8 34.3

GANJAM 73.2 7.5 19.2 70.9 16.2 13.0 68.9 13.4 17.7

GAJAPATI 54.9 23.1 22.0 16.0 26.4 57.6 34.3 25.4 40.3

KANDHAMAL 36.4 38.5 25.1 28.9 35.9 35.1 29.5 38.3 32.1

BOUDH 23.1 22.8 54.1 16.4 13.6 70.0 18.5 18.2 63.3

SUBARNAPUR 32.8 48.9 18.3 20.2 42.0 37.8 25.9 44.9 29.2

BALANGIR 14.3 73.0 12.8 13.1 29.1 57.8 12.6 49.1 38.3

NUAPADA 9.9 89.1 1.0 13.4 50.2 36.4 9.7 71.9 18.4

KALAHANDI 35.5 64.2 0.3 9.1 86.9 4.0 25.1 73.0 1.9

RAYAGADA 31.2 48.4 20.4 21.9 23.2 54.9 24.2 36.6 39.2

NABARANGPUR 11.9 53.6 34.4 19.9 23.6 56.5 15.4 38.7 45.9

KORAPUT 49.2 27.3 23.5 31.5 15.7 52.8 33.2 24.1 42.6

MALKANGIRI 0.0 81.8 18.2 16.0 42.4 41.6 5.5 61.9 32.7

ODISHA 35.0 36.2 28.8 38.7 26.5 34.8 33.3 32.3 34.4


In rural Odisha 33.3% household’s structure type of dwelling units were pucca. Highest pucca

structure type dwelling units were found in Ganjam district (68.9%) followed by Khurda

(56.9%) and lowest in Deogarh (4.9%) preceded by Malkangiri (5.5%).

27.8

14.4

14.9

4.5

18.1

19.8

16.4

28.5

23.8

32.1

49.9

54.4

49.8

44.9

40.7

39.7

56.9

54.8

68.9

34.3

29.5

18.5

25.9

12.6

9.7

25.1

24.2

15.4

33.2

5.5

33.3

42.3

83.1

75.1

60.0

58.9

40.1

41.6

30.4

14.6

8.8

7.1

20.4

9.8

14.9

22.9

15.5

19.0

10.8

13.4

25.4

38.3

18.2

44.9

49.1

71.9

73.0

36.6

38.7

24.1

61.9

32.3

29.9

2.5

10.0

35.4

23.0

40.0

42.0

41.1

61.6

59.1

43.0

25.3

40.4

40.2

36.4

44.8

24.1

34.3

17.7

40.3

32.1

63.3

29.2

38.3

18.4

1.9

39.2

45.9

42.6

32.7

34.4

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BARGARH

JHARSUGUDA

SAMBALPUR

DEOGARH

SUNDARGARH

KEONJHAR

MAYURBHANJ

BALASORE

BHADRAK

KENDRAPARA

JAGATSINGHPUR

CUTTACK

JAJPUR

DHENKANAL

ANGUL

NAYAGARH

KHURDA

PURI

GANJAM

GAJAPATI

KANDHAMAL

BOUDH

SUBARNAPUR

BALANGIR

NUAPADA

KALAHANDI

RAYAGADA

NABARANGPUR

KORAPUT

MALKANGIRI

ODISHA

Figure 5. 4 percentage distribution of households according to

structure type in rural Odisha based on pooled result

Pucca Semi-Pucca Katcha


Table-5.9 District wise percentage distribution of households according to type of

structure in Urban Odisha

Name of the District

Central State Pooled

Type of Structure Type of Structure Type of Structure

Pucca Semi-

Pucca Katcha Pucca

Semi-

Pucca Katcha Pucca

Semi-

Pucca Katcha

BARGARH 97.1 2.9 0.0 76.0 12.1 11.9 83.4 8 8.6

JHARSUGUDA 89.5 10.5 0.0 61.4 37.8 0.8 82.1 17.7 0.2

SAMBALPUR 61.2 34.9 3.9 63.4 33.8 2.7 67 29.5 3.5

DEOGARH 61.5 38.5 0.0 44.3 38.1 17.6 53 38.3 8.7

SUNDARGARH 89.1 10.9 0.0 41.7 31.5 26.8 69.7 19.7 10.6

KEONJHAR 29.2 37.2 33.6 18.3 23.4 58.3 21.4 28.3 50.3

MAYURBHANJ 18.5 68.4 13.1 88.3 8.7 3.0 41.2 49 9.8

BALASORE 59.5 34.9 5.5 77.8 13.1 9.1 72.9 18.9 8.1

BHADRAK 30.8 23.2 46.0 68.6 0.0 31.4 49.5 11.7 38.8

KENDRAPARA 64.0 5.5 30.5 100.0 0.0 0.0 74.9 3.8 21.3

JAGATSINGHPUR 64.4 18.0 17.6 71.7 9.2 19.1 73.8 9.9 16.3

CUTTACK 95.4 1.2 3.5 52.4 46.7 0.9 71.6 26.7 1.7

JAJPUR 100.0 0.0 0.0 86.4 0.0 13.6 91.7 0 8.3

DHENKANAL 83.2 0.0 16.8 99.5 0.3 0.3 94.4 0.2 5.4

ANGUL 92.2 1.6 6.2 74.0 17.9 8.1 82.5 11.6 5.9

NAYAGARH 79.4 6.9 13.7 84.0 12.9 3.1 81.5 9.5 9

KHURDA 94.6 4.1 1.3 96.5 2.3 1.2 96.3 2.7 1

PURI 75.6 1.6 22.8 50.9 34.8 14.3 60.1 22.5 17.4

GANJAM 97.7 2.3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 98.9 1.1 0

GAJAPATI 82.8 13.2 4.0 64.1 12.0 23.9 73.5 12.6 13.8

KANDHAMAL 83.6 16.4 0.0 97.2 1.5 1.2 91.8 7.5 0.7

BOUDH 79.2 8.8 12.0 71.4 17.9 10.7 73.7 15.2 11.1

SUBARNAPUR 59.5 30.9 9.6 39.3 60.7 0.0 49.8 45.2 5

BALANGIR 32.0 64.6 3.4 26.6 42.4 31.1 28.4 50.4 21.2

NUAPADA 70.0 30.0 0.0 90.9 6.7 2.4 80.9 17.8 1.3

KALAHANDI 55.0 45.0 0.0 3.0 97.0 0.0 25.8 74.2 0

RAYAGADA 91.0 9.0 0.0 60.5 25.6 13.9 75.8 17.2 6.9

NABARANGPUR 68.2 17.6 14.1 24.0 55.2 20.7 42.3 39.7 18

KORAPUT 92.5 3.0 4.5 95.5 0.0 4.5 94.6 0.9 4.5

MALKANGIRI 100.0 0.0 0.0 91.9 4.8 3.2 95.9 2.4 1.6

ODISHA 79.7 14.7 5.6 70.8 19.7 9.4 75.5 16.9 7.6


Figure-5.5

In urban Odisha 75.5% household’s structure type of dwelling units were pucca.

Highest pucca structure type dwelling units were found in Ganjam district (98.9%) followed

by Khurda (96.3%).

83.4

82.1

67.0

53.0

69.7

21.4

41.2

72.9

49.5

74.9

73.8

71.6

91.7

94.4

82.5

81.5

96.3

60.1

98.9

73.5

91.8

73.7

49.8

28.4

80.9

25.8

75.8

42.3

94.6

95.9

75.5

8.0

17.7

29.5

38.3

19.7

28.3

49.0

18.9

11.7

3.8

9.9

26.7

0.0

0.2

11.6

9.5

2.7

22.5

1.1

12.6

7.5

15.2

45.2

50.4

17.8

74.2

17.2

39.7

0.9

2.4

16.9

8.6

0.2

3.5

8.7

10.6

50.3

9.8

8.1

38.8

21.3

16.3

1.7

8.3

5.4

5.9

9.0

1.0

17.4

0.0

13.8

0.7

11.1

5.0

21.2

1.3

0.0

6.9

18.0

4.5

1.6

7.6

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BARGARH

JHARSUGUDA

SAMBALPUR

DEOGARH

SUNDARGARH

KEONJHAR

MAYURBHANJ

BALASORE

BHADRAK

KENDRAPARA

JAGATSINGHPUR

CUTTACK

JAJPUR

DHENKANAL

ANGUL

NAYAGARH

KHURDA

PURI

GANJAM

GAJAPATI

KANDHAMAL

BOUDH

SUBARNAPUR

BALANGIR

NUAPADA

KALAHANDI

RAYAGADA

NABARANGPUR

KORAPUT

MALKANGIRI

ODISHA

percentage distribution of households according to structure type in urban

Odisha based on pooled result

Pucca Semi-Pucca Katcha


Table5.10: Per 1000 distribution of households according to Tenurial Status of Dwelling in Rural Odisha.


Tenurial Status



BARGARH 968 30 3 942 18 40 955 24 21

JHARSUGUDA 872 0 128 1000 0 0 934 0 66

SAMBALPUR 685 130 185 1000 0 0 829 71 100

DEOGARH 1000 0 0 910 0 90 956 0 44

SUNDARGARH 971 25 4 998 2 0 983 14 2

KEONJHAR 906 94 0 1000 0 0 951 49 0

MAYURBHANJ 944 34 22 993 0 7 968 17 15

BALASORE 973 16 11 974 11 15 974 13 13

BHADRAK 989 0 11 1000 0 0 995 0 5

KENDRAPARA 1000 0 0 987 13 0 994 6 0

JAGATSINGHPUR 1000 0 0 987 13 0 993 7 0

CUTTACK 847 40 114 1000 0 0 914 22 64

JAJPUR 997 1 2 999 1 0 998 1 1

DHENKANAL 902 0 98 984 8 8 940 4 56

ANGUL 877 114 9 978 0 22 929 55 16

NAYAGARH 957 36 6 1000 0 0 979 18 3

KHURDA 987 13 0 985 15 0 986 14 0

PURI 980 20 0 998 2 0 989 11 0

GANJAM 952 48 0 969 31 0 960 40 0

GAJAPATI 710 139 151 1000 0 0 846 74 80

KANDHAMAL 990 10 0 950 0 50 967 4 29

BOUDH 936 64 0 1000 0 0 967 33 0

SUBARNAPUR 967 11 23 822 0 178 896 5 99

BALANGIR 997 0 3 984 0 16 990 0 10

NUAPADA 981 0 19 997 3 0 988 2 10

KALAHANDI 696 289 15 1000 0 0 819 172 9

RAYAGADA 669 0 331 1000 0 0 822 0 178

NABARANGPUR 1000 0 0 979 0 21 991 0 9

KORAPUT 762 238 0 909 91 0 827 173 0

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 0 969 0 31 983 0 17

ODISHA 916 53 31 980 9 11 947 32 22


Figure 5.6

In rural Odisha 94.7% households were living in owned house whereas 3.2% households were

living in hired house. Tenurial status (hired) was highest in rural areas of Koraput and

Kalahandi districts i.e.17.3% and 17.2% respectively.

95.5

93.4

82.9

95.6

98.3

95.1

96.8

97.4

99.5

99.4

99.3

91.4

99.8

94.0

92.9

97.9

98.6

98.9

96.0

84.6

96.7

96.7

89.6

99.0

98.8

81.9

82.2

99.1

82.7

98.3

94.7

2.4

0.0

7.1

0.0

1.4

4.9

1.7

1.3

0.0

0.6

0.7

2.2

0.1

0.4

5.5

1.8

1.4

1.1

4.0

7.4

0.4

3.3

0.5

0.0

0.2

17.2

0.0

0.0

17.3

0.0

3.2

2.1

6.6

10.0

4.4

0.2

0.0

1.5

1.3

0.5

0.0

0.0

6.4

0.1

5.6

1.6

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.0

2.9

0.0

9.9

1.0

1.0

0.9

17.8

0.9

0.0

1.7

2.2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BARGARH

JHARSUGUDA

SAMBALPUR

DEOGARH

SUNDARGARH

KEONJHAR

MAYURBHANJ

BALASORE

BHADRAK

KENDRAPARA

JAGATSINGHPUR

CUTTACK

JAJPUR

DHENKANAL

ANGUL

NAYAGARH

KHURDA

PURI

GANJAM

GAJAPATI

KANDHAMAL

BOUDH

SUBARNAPUR

BALANGIR

NUAPADA

KALAHANDI

RAYAGADA

NABARANGPUR

KORAPUT

MALKANGIRI

ODISHA

Percentage Distribution of Households according to Tenural Status in Rural Odisha

Based on Pooled Result

Owned Hired Others


Table 5.11: Per 1000 distribution of households according to Tenurial Status of Dwelling in Urban Odisha.

Name of the

District

Tenurial status



BARGARH 351 643 6 519 419 61 471 494 34

JHARSUGUDA 187 808 4 909 91 0 389 608 3

SAMBALPUR 676 240 84 609 363 27 660 294 47

DEOGARH 569 431 0 458 542 0 514 486 0

SUNDARGARH 539 460 1 836 122 42 677 309 13

KEONJHAR 863 50 86 850 150 0 858 113 29

MAYURBHANJ 645 355 0 708 292 0 666 334 0

BALASORE 619 381 0 519 451 30 545 433 22

BHADRAK 627 353 20 491 509 0 559 430 10

KENDRAPARA 500 500 0 905 95 0 623 377 0

JAGATSINGHPUR 356 602 41 811 169 20 587 379 33

CUTTACK 512 435 52 794 116 90 671 259 71

JAJPUR 268 653 79 633 367 0 490 479 31

DHENKANAL 909 91 0 218 782 0 434 566 0

ANGUL 106 836 59 639 231 130 449 460 91

NAYAGARH 943 57 0 1000 0 0 969 31 0

KHURDA 93 878 29 496 415 89 333 608 59

PURI 425 98 477 753 247 0 631 192 177

GANJAM 376 624 0 659 311 30 527 457 16

GAJAPATI 721 279 0 561 0 439 642 141 217

KANDHAMAL 566 434 0 191 809 0 342 658 0

BOUDH 615 385 0 860 140 0 787 213 0

SUBARNAPUR 775 225 0 1000 0 0 883 117 0

BALANGIR 512 454 34 805 195 0 693 298 10

NUAPADA 525 475 0 926 74 0 734 266 0

KALAHANDI 533 467 0 975 25 0 781 219 0

RAYAGADA 521 479 0 878 122 0 699 301 0

NABARANGPUR 685 315 0 806 142 52 756 213 31

KORAPUT 405 595 0 199 729 72 260 689 51

MALKANGIRI 231 299 470 291 593 116 261 447 291

ODISHA 433 528 39 637 312 50 545 413 42


Figure 5.7

In urban Odisha 54.5% households were living in owned house whereas 41.3%

households were living in hired house. Tenurial status (hired) was highest in urban areas of

Koraput district and lowest in Nayagarh district i.e. 3.1%.

47.1

38.9

66.0

51.4

67.7

85.8

66.6

54.5

55.9

62.3

58.7

67.1

49.0

43.4

44.9

96.9

33.3

63.1

52.7

64.2

34.2

78.7

88.3

69.3

73.4

78.1

69.9

75.6

26.0

26.1

54.5

49.4

60.8

29.4

48.6

30.9

11.3

33.4

43.3

43.0

37.7

37.9

25.9

47.9

56.6

46.0

3.1

60.8

19.2

45.7

14.1

65.8

21.3

11.7

29.8

26.6

21.9

30.1

21.3

68.9

44.7

41.3

3.4

0.3

4.7

0.0

1.3

2.9

0.0

2.2

1.0

0.0

3.3

7.1

3.1

0.0

9.1

0.0

5.9

17.7

1.6

21.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.1

5.1

29.1

4.2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BARGARH

JHARSUGUDA

SAMBALPUR

DEOGARH

SUNDARGARH

KEONJHAR

MAYURBHANJ

BALASORE

BHADRAK

KENDRAPARA

JAGATSINGHPUR

CUTTACK

JAJPUR

DHENKANAL

ANGUL

NAYAGARH

KHURDA

PURI

GANJAM

GAJAPATI

KANDHAMAL

BOUDH

SUBARNAPUR

BALANGIR

NUAPADA

KALAHANDI

RAYAGADA

NABARANGPUR

KORAPUT

MALKANGIRI

ODISHA

Percentage Distribution of Households according to Tenural Status in Urban Odisha Based on Pooled Result.

Owned Hired Others


Table 5.12: District wise average floor area in 0.00 (sq. Mt.)

Name of the

District

Rural Urban

Central State Pooled Central State Pooled

Average Floor Area in 0.00(sq. Mt) Average Floor Area in 0.00 (sq. Mt)

BARGARH 22.7 35.4 29.0 44.1 46.5 45.8

JHARSUGUDA 32.5 41.6 36.9 30.3 32.5 31.0

SAMBALPUR 36.4 30.5 33.7 34.7 39.6 37.4

DEOGARH 29.8 32.0 30.9 33.6 28.6 31.1

SUNDARGARH 45.2 49.3 47.1 40.1 66.5 52.6

KEONJHAR 24.8 41.9 32.9 26.2 37.6 33.6

MAYURBHANJ 29.8 51.1 40.4 37.4 60.8 45.0

BALASORE 27.0 40.8 33.6 29.1 61.3 52.7

BHADRAK 33.9 38.1 36.0 29.9 33.6 31.8

KENDRAPARA 42.7 33.4 38.1 27.6 33.2 29.3

JAGATSINGHPUR 32.4 28.4 30.3 18.9 36.8 29.6

CUTTACK 67.7 44.8 57.7 35.4 40.2 38.2

JAJPUR 28.1 28.7 28.4 34.6 39.5 37.6

DHENKANAL 22.5 35.5 28.5 33.9 18.3 23.2

ANGUL 27.1 63.9 46.0 52.3 81.5 73.0

NAYAGARH 27.0 26.9 27.0 24.2 23.7 24.0

KHURDA 30.5 65.4 48.3 23.4 67.0 49.7

PURI 27.3 43.0 35.3 18.6 98.2 68.7

GANJAM 27.5 41.5 34.1 48.3 39.5 43.6

GAJAPATI 26.7 43.2 34.4 39.6 44.4 42.0

KANDHAMAL 29.1 23.6 25.9 42.9 35.0 38.2

BOUDH 23.0 25.0 24.0 42.2 50.4 47.9

SUBARNAPUR 24.5 33.5 28.9 28.3 27.6 27.9

BALANGIR 23.1 27.3 25.3 24.3 25.7 25.1

NUAPADA 27.6 26.0 26.8 37.2 38.8 38.0

KALAHANDI 24.7 41.0 31.3 33.4 50.0 42.7

RAYAGADA 30.5 23.5 27.3 33.8 30.1 32.0

NABARANGPUR 42.2 30.9 37.0 56.2 36.7 44.8

KORAPUT 26.2 23.1 24.8 54.9 40.3 44.6

MALKANGIRI 31.8 34.3 33.2 33.3 49.3 41.4

ODISHA 31.3 38.2 34.6 34.0 50.9 43.6


Figure-5.8

In rural Odisha Cuttack district has the highest average floor area of the dwelling unit

i.e. 57.68 (sq. Mt.) followed by Khurda 48.34 sq. mt.It is lowest in Boudh district (23.98,

sq.mt).

23.98

24.83

25.29

25.94

26.83

26.96

27.26

28.41

28.54

28.88

28.97

30.3

30.93

31.3

32.94

33.16

33.6

33.7

34.1

34.44

34.62

35.3

35.98

36.93

37.03

38.06

40.44

46

47.1

48.34

57.68

BOUDH

KORAPUT

BALANGIR

KANDHAMAL

NUAPADA

NAYAGARH

RAYAGADA

JAJPUR

DHENKANAL

SUBARNAPUR

BARGARH

JAGATSINGHPUR

DEOGARH

KALAHANDI

KEONJHAR

MALKANGIRI

BALASORE

SAMBALPUR

GANJAM

GAJAPATI

ODISHA

PURI

BHADRAK

JHARSUGUDA

NABARANGPUR

KENDRAPARA

MAYURBHANJ

ANGUL

SUNDARGARH

KHURDA

CUTTACK

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

District wise Average Floor Area of the Dwelling Unit in Rural Odisha


Figure-5.9

In urban Odisha Angul has the highest average floor area of the dwelling unit i.e. 73.04

(sq. Mt.) followed by puri 68.72 sq.Mt. .It is lowest in Dhenkanal district (23.18,sq.mt).

23.18

23.95

25.13

27.92

29.31

29.59

31.02

31.1

31.76

31.98

33.59

37.36

37.59

38.03

38.15

38.2

41.4

41.98

42.69

43.57

43.61

44.63

44.79

45.01

45.77

47.92

49.74

52.57

52.71

68.72

73.04

DHENKANAL

NAYAGARH

BALANGIR

SUBARNAPUR

KENDRAPARA

JAGATSINGHPUR

JHARSUGUDA

DEOGARH

BHADRAK

RAYAGADA

KEONJHAR

SAMBALPUR

JAJPUR

NUAPADA

CUTTACK

KANDHAMAL

MALKANGIRI

GAJAPATI

KALAHANDI

ODISHA

GANJAM

KORAPUT

NABARANGPUR

MAYURBHANJ

BARGARH

BOUDH

KHURDA

SUNDARGARH

BALASORE

PURI

ANGUL

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Average Floor Area in 0.00 (sq. Mt.) of the Dwelling Unit in Urban

Odisha


Chapter Six

RELATIVE STANDARD ERROR (RSE)

All the estimates derived in this report are based on the data collected from the

randomly selected sample households of sample villages/urban blocks. Hence the derived

estimates consists of both sampling and non-sampling error.

The Relative Standard Error (RSE) measures the extent to which a sample survey

estimate is likely to deviate from the true population. The Relative Standard Error (RSE) is the

standard error expressed as a fraction of the estimate and is usually displayed as a percentage.

The measure is also called as co-efficient of variation (%). Estimates with less RSE are reliable

and more RSE are subject to high sampling error and should be used with caution.

Relative Standard Error (RSE) in percentage (%) using Matching Ratio (MR) method

on various pooled results has been estimated for each district of Odisha for both rural and urban

sectors.

5.1 Estimates of Relative Standard Error (RSE)

For aggregate Y

100ˆ

ˆˆ

Y

YVarYRSE

100ˆ

ˆˆ

R

RMSERRSE

*The detail formula Var ( Y ) MSE ( R ) is available at appendix A.

6.2 RSE (%) derived for different indicators used for district level estimation

In the following tables RSE (%) of different indicators at district level has been presented.


District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no bathroom:

Table: 6.1 District wise relative standard error on no bathroom facility for state, central and

pooled samples


Centre State Pooled Centre State Pooled Centre State Pooled

Bargarh 5.34 5.16 3.71 9.92 22.3 12.68 5 5.41 3.70

Jharsuguda 9.04 5.37 5.45 8.55 1.42 5.06 5.56 2.69 3.31

Sambalpur 5.11 13.24 6.71 21.68 15.3 14.13 7.58 11 6.33

Deogarh 8.37 6.86 5.45 9.83 8.79 6.39 8 6.94 5.31

Sundargarh 5.04 4.42 3.36 14.81 5.11 8.66 6.56 2.47 3.68

Keonjhar 9.47 3.89 5.08 15.83 3.61 9.52 8.9 3.06 4.70

Mayurbhanj 4.2 7.59 4.27 9.69 26.47 13.10 4.1 7.85 4.37

Balasore 6.05 5.67 4.19 7.27 10.26 6.24 5.06 4.48 3.43

Bhadrak 6.7 2.32 3.24 1.72 10.36 6.33 6.1 2.96 3.14

Kendrapara 4.55 0.03 2.27 2.61 4.3 2.50 4.34 0.52 2.17

Jagatsinghpur 3.43 5.32 3.30 24.82 7.02 15.71 4.57 4.54 3.23

Cuttack 4.19 6.79 3.92 17.17 16.56 11.94 5.02 11.56 6.39

Jajpur 4.71 5.23 3.52 8.53 9.6 6.34 4.49 4.8 3.29

Dhenkanal 3.25 10.11 4.60 8.56 0.54 5.25 3.6 8.91 4.25

Angul 10.69 7.85 6.83 9.9 3.74 4.63 9.39 5.4 5.51

Nayagarh 7.92 3.92 4.61 19.91 3.32 10.95 7.3 3.75 4.30

Khurda 6.97 3.9 3.89 18.7 4.18 9.28 14.37 3.6 7.08

Puri 6.71 3.76 3.69 7.4 11.92 7.48 5.02 3.36 2.97

Ganjam 5.17 3.42 3.23 16.34 5.05 8.44 4.98 2.84 2.99

Gajapati 10.54 5.07 6.53 0.08 11.81 4.83 9.13 5.2 5.81

Kandhamal 19.27 5.69 11.10 11.49 9.48 8.58 17.52 5.53 10.16

Boudh 3.12 2.13 2.00 24.09 8.14 12.22 3.28 2.07 2.06

Subarnapur 6.2 3.84 3.72 6.46 4.18 3.61 5.74 4.29 3.60

Balangir 4.15 3.74 2.91 1.06 6.66 3.07 3.66 3.26 2.54

Nuapada 5.78 9.06 5.61 10.48 9.08 6.97 5.45 8.78 5.40

Kalahandi 5.19 6.85 4.41 14.78 22.97 14.32 4.97 6.67 4.27

Rayagada 3.34 4.45 2.70 10.21 31.79 16.52 3.09 5.79 3.00

Nabarangpur 11.33 5.81 6.49 2.82 3.17 2.14 10.53 5.24 5.97

Koraput 12.23 6.61 8.39 29.47 13.45 18.85 12.13 6.04 8.15

Malkangiri 12.95 10.94 8.33 6.16 12.25 7.00 11.77 10.63 7.82

Odisha 1.29 1.19 0.88 5.58 4.47 3.58 1.59 1.58 1.12


District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no bathroom in Rural Odisha

Figure: 6.1R

District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no bathroom in Urban Odisha

Figure: 6.1U


Relative standard error (RSE) on no bathroom facility for Odisha is presented in Table

6.1 and figures 6.1R and 6.1U .For “no bathroom” in rural Odisha for pooled samples except

Kandhamal (11.10%) all other districts were found to be within 10 percent. Maximum districts

of rural areas were found to be within 5 per cent .Districts like Kendrapara, Boudh, Balangir

and Rayagada were found to be within 3 percent. Whereas in urban Odisha 9 districts were

found to be within the range of 10 to 20 percent RSE. Remaining 21 districts were below 10

percent RSE.

District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no latrine in Rural Odisha

Figure 6.2R:


District wise relative standard Error (RSE) in % on no latrine in Urban Odisha

Figure 6.2U:

Relative standard error (RSE) on no latrine for pooled samples of Odisha is presented

in figure-6.2R and 6.2U .For “no latrine” in rural Odisha except Khurda (11.24%) and Angul

(10.28%) all other districts were found to be within 10 percent. Maximum districts of rural

areas were found to be within 5 per cent .Districts like Malkangiri, Nabarangpur, Balangir,

Boudh, Kandhamal, Nayagarh, Jajpur, Bhadrak, Mayurbhanj, Keonjhar, Sundargarh,

Jharsuguda and Baragarh were found to be within the range of 0 to 5 percent. For urban Odisha

Bargarh, Subarnapur, Sundargarh, Bhadrak and Nayagarh districts were found to be within 20

per cent. In the combined sector (rural + urban) Odisha except Ganjam, Angul and Jharsuguda

all other districts were below 10 percent.


Table 6. 2 Relative Standard Error (RSE) in% of average floor area for dwelling unit

Name of the District Rural Urban

Centre State Pool Centre State Pool

BARGARH 19.76 5.38 8.41 0.00 5.26 2.67

JHARSUGUDA 19.76 4.12 9.00 0.00 0.11 0.06

SAMBALPUR 2.60 20.64 9.46 117.28 18.40 55.30

DEOGARH 102.02 8.83 49.42 0.00 3.22 1.48

SUNDARGARH 101.95 6.01 48.97 0.00 43.71 27.63

KEONJHAR 49.50 4.15 18.83 124.43 15.41 49.33

MAYURBHANJ 18.36 11.30 9.83 31.33 17.70 17.67

BALASORE 9.70 10.60 7.52 90.44 12.41 25.95

BHADRAK 6.24 8.30 5.29 8.85 28.87 15.84

KENDRAPARA 13.12 6.70 7.92 69.24 1.80 32.65

JAGATSINGHPUR 11.04 11.83 8.09 49.59 12.33 17.56

CUTTACK 21.72 6.33 12.98 82.53 10.90 38.67

JAJPUR 6.67 3.08 3.65 0.00 23.76 12.50

DHENKANAL 13.56 11.66 9.00 58.96 94.82 57.09

ANGUL 20.55 21.10 15.86 27.42 30.59 19.69

NAYAGARH 22.40 1.34 11.25 87.15 4.30 43.99

KHURDA 20.49 14.07 11.51 71.13 22.81 22.71

PURI 19.97 5.32 8.38 95.48 39.18 30.85

GANJAM 29.00 12.17 13.84 0.00 15.86 7.19

GAJAPATI 82.41 25.79 35.85 71.07 35.76 38.48

KANDHAMAL 75.23 3.65 42.24 0.00 2.15 0.99

BOUDH 9.36 24.79 13.68 89.20 22.71 41.06

SUBARNAPUR 59.82 17.84 27.35 108.43 18.03 55.57

BALANGIR 25.60 5.89 12.11 101.56 21.63 50.41

NUAPADA 92.97 9.81 47.97 0.00 17.25 8.79

KALAHANDI 77.44 7.23 30.86 0.00 9.49 5.55

RAYAGADA 35.25 10.88 20.29 0.00 10.33 4.86

NABARANGPUR 37.39 4.42 21.39 118.89 9.08 74.67

KORAPUT 25.33 6.04 13.67 91.53 2.69 56.28

MALKANGIRI 0.00 4.69 2.42 0.00 14.26 8.50

ODISHA 4.81 2.50 2.57 27.02 8.23 11.60

In rural Odisha for variable average floor area RSE of 12 districts were below 10% and RSE

of 10 districts were within 10-20%. In urban Odisha for variable average floor area RSE of 9

districts were below 10% and RSE of 5 districts were within 10-20%.


Table 6. 3 Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % of dwelling type

Name of the

District

Centre State Pool

Pucca Semi-

Pucca Katcha Pucca

Semi-

Pucca Katcha Pucca

Semi-

Pucca Katcha

BARGARH 19.99 16.62 19.76 11.55 23.82 15.35 11.62 13.67 12.25

JHARSUGUDA 28.31 9.17 19.76 21.96 1.86 0.00 21.20 4.23 18.97

SAMBALPUR 73.78 22.00 2.60 56.61 7.39 32.22 51.54 10.49 6.43

DEOGARH 97.98 22.70 102.02 103.46 7.55 4.60 74.00 14.62 29.58

SUNDARGARH 46.57 9.51 101.95 13.05 13.83 6.84 22.84 7.70 7.20

KEONJHAR 22.08 13.72 49.50 24.31 21.58 10.78 17.14 11.64 14.27

MAYURBHANJ 12.60 13.84 18.36 23.68 9.01 9.71 16.29 8.71 10.44

BALASORE 23.63 9.55 9.70 14.84 20.38 15.03 13.13 10.26 8.85

BHADRAK 7.56 21.16 6.24 21.78 32.51 12.67 11.23 18.08 7.34

KENDRAPARA 25.95 35.50 13.12 22.10 20.76 14.60 17.03 19.25 9.78

JAGATSINGHPUR 4.86 16.64 11.04 11.07 32.39 8.33 5.42 16.22 6.59

CUTTACK 9.33 23.37 21.72 6.10 17.81 11.09 5.54 14.52 13.35

JAJPUR 9.11 14.44 6.67 5.49 14.47 10.29 5.00 10.29 5.73

DHENKANAL 15.21 23.56 13.56 9.87 10.58 12.07 9.00 13.49 9.07

ANGUL 10.13 51.12 20.55 55.23 56.44 28.78 19.45 46.88 17.60

NAYAGARH 22.91 57.66 22.40 14.89 15.77 8.88 13.84 20.62 13.04

KHURDA 11.44 12.12 20.49 6.04 15.17 31.89 6.25 10.42 17.45

PURI 14.32 37.60 19.97 12.03 23.08 20.70 9.20 21.68 14.76

GANJAM 9.00 24.21 29.00 6.66 21.02 21.13 5.70 17.02 18.40

GAJAPATI 56.21 61.40 82.41 64.50 54.61 36.32 46.12 40.98 35.59

KANDHAMAL 24.42 65.04 75.23 26.75 27.34 32.18 18.69 35.42 34.88

BOUDH 23.27 44.62 9.36 23.61 70.50 16.76 16.96 38.14 10.46

SUBARNAPUR 42.68 7.02 59.82 18.19 10.90 12.06 27.82 6.25 20.53

BALANGIR 49.40 10.62 25.60 18.48 13.21 5.83 29.17 8.70 6.36

NUAPADA 74.98 9.09 92.97 31.65 49.15 75.14 41.28 18.77 78.04

KALAHANDI 43.41 23.86 77.44 43.23 5.17 64.62 31.84 10.92 75.07

RAYAGADA 51.50 33.87 35.25 9.14 16.83 7.17 33.34 23.00 10.75

NABARANGPUR 28.34 25.42 37.39 30.51 34.61 5.45 22.29 19.91 14.45

KORAPUT 3.56 20.18 25.33 38.45 15.65 9.45 8.14 13.18 10.16

MALKANGIRI 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.69 2.19 1.17 4.26 0.80 0.80

ODISHA 4.47 3.94 4.81 3.47 4.67 3.02 2.87 3.00 2.68

For variable pucca structure RSE of 9 districts were below 10%. For variable semi-pucca

structure RSE of 6 districts were below 10%. For variable katcha structure RSE of 10 districts

were below 10%.


Chapter VI

CONCLUSION

Social and economic development is not possible without basic social infrastructure for human

development. Social infrastructure for human need means building a strong foundation of

human development towards a dignified life for all. Quality of life, health, hygiene and social

environment, largely depend on safe drinking water and proper sanitation. This report shows

the status of water, sanitation facilities along with housing condition of people of Odisha.

Although this report is based on the estimates obtained from pooed sample data (a sample

of double size), the sample proportion is still less than 1%. After all attempts has been done to

derive district level reliable result using scientific procedure. For pooling two sets of sample

poolability test has been done and it is satisfied for more districts and results have been

estimated on different characteristics by matching ratio method. For reliability of result district

level Relative Standard Error (RSE) has been estimated for different indicators like drinking

water facility, bathroom facility and latrine facility and housing characteristics for both rural

and urban sector.

As per the result of the 76.2 percent households in rural Odisha and 33.4 percent households

in urban Odisha had “community use” of their principal source of drinking water. In case of

community use as principal source of drinking water, in rural areas, Khurda (39.7%),

Jagatsinghpur (43.1%), Bhadrak (56.4%) had the lowest estimated proportion of households

and Malkangiri (100%), Jharsuguda (99.5%) Nabarangpur (98.8%) had the highest estimated

proportion of households. In case of community use of principal source of drinking water, in

the combined sector of Odisha, Khurda (26.9%), Jagatsinghpur (41%) and Jajpur (49.2%) had

the lowest and Deogarh (96.7%), Balangir (96.6%) and Nabarangpur (96.4%) had the highest

estimated proportion of households. The percentage of households who had exclusive use of

their principal source of drinking water is found more in urban Odisha i.e. 38.4% while for

rural Odisha it is 11.8% only. In rural Odisha, Jagatsinghpur (39.7%), Khurda (36.3%) and

Balasore (32.3%) had the highest proportion of households having exclusive accesses to their

respective principal source of drinking water. Among districts in urban Odisha, Nayagarh

(2.0%), Deogarh (3.9%) and Subarnapur (5.8%) had the lowest and Koraput (74.1%), Nuapada


(65%) and Puri (55.9%) had the highest proportion of households having exclusive accesses to

their respective principal source of drinking water. In the combined sector of Odisha, Nayagarh

(0.3%), Balangir (1%) and Deogarh (1.6%) had the lowest and Khurda (44.3%), Jagatsinghpur

(39.2%) and Balasore (30.5%) had the highest proportion of households having exclusive

accesses to their respective principal source of drinking water. Lower proportion of community

use and higher proportion of exclusive for drinking water symbolises the development of the

districts.

Again 81.5 percent households in rural Odisha and 94.9 percent households in urban Odisha

had protected (safe) source of drinking water whereas for Odisha as a whole 83.4 percent

households in Odisha had protected (safe) principal source of drinking water. In the rural areas

of Odisha, Kendrapara, Jagatsinghpur, Nabarangpur and Malkangiri had the highest (100

percent) and Deogarh (18.1 percent), Jharsuguda (19.7 percent), Kandhamal (27.6 percent) had

the lowest proportion of households having protected (safe) drinking water. In the urban areas

of Odisha, districts like, Sambalpur, Sundargarh, Mayurbhanj, Balasore, Bhadrak,

Jagatsinghpur, Jajpur, Angul, Puri, Boudh, Balangir, Nuapada, Rayagada, Nabarangpur,

Koraput, Malkangiri had the highest (100 percent) and Nayagarh(72percent),Kandhamal (77.2

percent),Cuttack (80.3 percent) had the lowest proportion of households having protected (safe)

drinking water. In the combined sector of Odisha, Jagatsinghpur, Nabarangpur and Malkangiri

had the highest (100 percent) and Deogarh (24.6 percent), Kandhamal (30.4 percent)

Dhenkanal (45.3 percent), had the lowest proportion of households having protected (safe)

principal source of drinking water.

88.5% of rural households do not have a bathroom . Such severely limited access to secure

bathing spaces in rural Odisha needs more attention. Civil society organizations working on

women’s issues should consider the issue more seriously. There is a clear need to look at the

hardship faced by rural women due to the lack of secure bathing spaces with access to water.

More number of households (41percent) belonging to urban Odisha had attached

bathroom as compared to households belonging to rural Odisha (3.2 percent). Among the

districts in rural areas, Deogarh, Keonjhar and Malkangiri had the lowest (0%) proportion of

households with attached bathroom while Kendrapara (14.9%), Sambalpur (8%), Angul (7%)

had the highest proportion of households with attached bathroom. In urban areas, among all


districts, Keonjhar (6.7 percent), Deogarh (10.5 percent), Balangir (12 percent) had the lowest

proportion of households with attached bathroom while Bargarh (65.2 percent), Rayagada

(64.7 percent),Nuapada (63.6percent) had the highest proportion of households with attached

bathroom . In the combined sector(rural + urban) of Odisha, in Keonjhar(0.8%)

,Deogarh(0.9%), and Subarnapur (1.3%), Balangir(1.3%) had the lowest proportion of

households with attached bathroom while Jharsuguda (28.8%) ,Khurda(26.4%), Sambalpur

(19.8%) had the highest proportion of households with attached bathroom .Higher proportion

of households (88.5 percent) in the rural areas did not have any bathroom as compared to urban

areas (31.9 percent). Among rural areas of districts, Deogarh (100 percent), Malkangiri (100

percent), Nabarangpur (99 percent) had the highest and Khurda (60.2 percent), Cuttack (70.9

percent), Kalahandi (72 percent), had the lowest proportion of households without any

bathroom. Among all districts in urban areas, Deogarh (83.7 percent), Subarnapur (7.48

percent), Keonjhar (70.1 percent) had the highest and Koraput (5.4 percent), Malkangiri (10.3

percent), Rayagada (17.7 percent) had the lowest proportion of households without any

bathroom. In the combined sector (rural + urban) of Odisha, Deogarh (98.6 percent),

Subarnapur (95.8 percent), Nabarangpur (95.8 percent) had the highest and Khurda (37.6

percent), Jharsuguda (61.1 percent), Cuttack (61.5 percent), had the lowest proportion of

households without any bathroom.

Odisha has a large number of people who are used to open defecation in the absence

of proper sanitation facility. Many people wait for late night or early morning for it. This

practice has been affecting the privacy and dignity of women in rural villages. The children,

sick, elderly people and pregnant women face a lot of problems in the absence of a proper

sanitary facility at home. It is unfortunate that a vast majority of people of the State use open

space for defecation which is higher than national average and highest in comparison to other

developed States. Poor sanitation is a major cause of ill health, leading to unemployment and

poverty in rural villages. In 2012, 81 percent households in rural Odisha, 20.1 percent

households in urban Odisha and 71.2 percent households in the combined sector of Odisha had

no latrine facilities. Among rural areas of all districts Malkangiri (100 percent), Jharsuguda

(98.9 percent) and Kandhamal (97.6 percent) had the highest proportion of households that had

no latrine facilities .Among urban areas of all districts Subarnapur (69.6 percent), Keonjhar

(56.9 percent) and Balangir (49.4 percent) had the highest proportion of households that had


no latrine facilities. Ganjam (2.2 percent), Kandhamal (2.7percent) and Koraput (4.3 percent)

had the lowest proportion of households having no latrine facilities. In the combined sector of

Odisha, Malkangiri (92.9 percent), Nabarangpur (92.4 percent) and Kandhamal (92 percent)

had the highest proportion of households that had no latrine facilities. Khurda (31.9 percent),

Cuttack (53.1 percent) and Angul (57.9 percent) had the lowest proportion of households

having no latrine facilities In rural Odisha 80.1% households, who have access to latrine facility

used piped sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine. In urban Odisha 95.7% households who

have access to latrine facility used piped sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine. In the

combined sector of Odisha 86.7% households who have access to latrine facility used piped

sewer system/septic tank/pit type latrine

One of the most important determinants of community health and wellbeing is the status

of safe drinking water and sanitation. These facilities are critical component of what we call it

as “Health Infrastructure”. It has been reflected in various researches that the safe drinking

water and improved sanitation can lead to substantial reduction of instances of diseases in the

state which are preventive in nature. So more attention should be taken for these basic facilities.

For entire Odisha the Average floor area of the dwelling unit for households is 36.07

square metres (fur rural households 34.62 square metres and for urban 43.58 square metres)

39.2 percent households are living with ‘bad’ ventilation in their dwelling unit considering all

structure type. 40.1 percent households had lived in a house with pucca structure (for rural

households 33.3 and for urban households 75.5). Top five districts in Odisha, where households

had lived in a house with pucca structure were Ganjam (68.9),Khurda (56.9),Puri

(54.8),Cuttack (54.4) and Jagatsinghpur (49.9).Bottom five districts in Odisha, where

households had lived in a house with pucca structure were Deogarh (4.5), Malkangir (5.5),

Nuapada (9.7),Balangir (12.6) and Jharsuguda (14.6).Top five districts in Odisha according to

average floor area (in square metres) of the dwelling unit for households are, Cuttack (51.9),

Angul (49.28), Khurda (49.11) , Sundargarh (48.88) and Mayurbhanj (40.74).Bottom five

districts in Odisha according to average floor area (in square metres) of the dwelling unit for

households are Boudh (24.77), Balangir (25.27), Kandhamal (26.67), Nayagarh (26.82) and

Nuapada (27.32).In Rural Odisha 34.4 percent households used to live in house with katcha

structure, where in urban only 7.6 percent households lived in katcha structure. In rural Odisha


65.6 percent households lived in a house either pucca or semi-pucca type structure, for urban

Odisha it was 92.4 percent, according to pooled result. According to pooled result 51.1 percent

rural households and 66.5 urban households with ‘katcha’ structure type had lived in a house

with ‘bad’ condition, in Odisha. Very negligible 4.4 percent rural households and 2.4 percent

urban households with “Pucca” structure lived in a house with ‘bad’ condition. Pucca structure

with good ventilation symbolises to the development of the district or state.


Appendix A

Estimation Procedure


Appendix_A

ESTIMATION PROCEDURE

Estimation Procedure

Notations:

s = subscript for s-th stratum

t = subscript for t-th sub-stratum

m = subscript for sub-sample (m =1, 2, 3)

i = subscript for i-th FSU [village (panchayat ward)/ block]

d = subscript for a hamlet-group/ sub-block (d = 1, 2)

j = subscript for j-th second stage stratum in an FSU/ hg/sb [ j = 1, 2 or 3]

k = subscript for k-th sample household under a particular second stage stratum within an FSU/

hg/sb

a = subscript for a-th slum (whole or part) found within the urban FSU

D = total number of hg’s/ sb’s formed in the sample FSU

D* = 0 if D = 1

= (D – 1) for FSUs with D > 1

N = total number of FSUs in any urban sub-stratum

Z = total size of a rural sub-stratum (= sum of sizes for all the FSUs of a sub-stratum)

z = size of sample village used for selection.

n = number of sample FSUs surveyed including ‘uninhabited’ and ‘zero cases’ but excluding

casualty for a particular sub-sample and sub-stratum.

L = total number of slums (whole or part) found within the sample urban FSU.

b = total number of UFS blocks intersecting the slum.


H = total number of households listed in a second-stage stratum of an FSU / hamlet-group or

sub-block of sample FSU

h = number of households surveyed in a second-stage stratum of an FSU / hamlet-group or sub-

block of sample FSU

x, y = observed value of characteristics x, y under estimation

X , Y = estimate of population total X, Y for the characteristics x, y

Under the above symbols,

ystmidjk = observed value of the characteristic y for the k-th household in the j-th second stage

stratum of the d-th hg/ sb (d = 1, 2) of the i-th FSU belonging to the m-th sub-sample for the t-

th sub-stratum of s-th stratum.

However, for ease of understanding, a few symbols have been suppressed in following

paragraphs where they are obvious.

Formulae for Estimation of Aggregates for a particular sub-sample and stratum sub-

stratum:

Schedule 0.0:

Rural:

(i) For estimating the number of households in a stratum sub-stratum possessing a

characteristic:

n

yDyzn

ZY

iiii

i12

*1

1ˆ

where 1iy , 2iy are the total number of households possessing the characteristic y in hg’s

1 & 2 of the i-th FSU respectively.

(ii) For estimating the number of villages in a stratum sub-stratum possessing a characteristic:

n

yzn

ZY

i

i

i1

1ˆ

where iy is taken as 1 for sample villages possessing the characteristic and 0

otherwise.


Urban:

(i) For estimating the number of households in a stratum sub-stratum possessing a

characteristic:

n

yDyn

NY

iiii

12

*1

ˆ

where 1iy and 2iy are the total number of households possessing the characteristic y

belonging to sub-blocks 1 and 2 respectively, of the i-th FSU.

Schedules 1.2:

Rural:

(i) For j-th second-stage stratum of a stratum sub-stratum:

j

i

h

kjki

ji

jii

h

kjki

ji

ji

ijj

ny

h

HDy

h

H

zn

ZY

jiji

1 12

2

2*

11

1

1211ˆ

(ii) For all second-stage strata combined:

j

jYY ˆˆ

Urban (only for sub-samples 1 and 2):

(i) For j-th second stage stratum of a stratum sub-stratum:

j

i

h

kjki

ji

jii

h

kjki

ji

ji

jj

ny

h

HDy

h

H

n

NY

jiji

1 12

2

2*

11

1

121

ˆ

(ii) For all second-stage strata combined:


j

jYY ˆˆ

Schedules 0.21:

Urban (for sub-samples 1, 2 and 3):

(i) For estimating the number of slums in a stratum sub-stratum possessing a

characteristic:

n

yL

bn

NY

iia

i

a ia1 1

1ˆ

where iay is taken as 1 for a-th slum of i-th sample block possessing the

characteristic and 0 otherwise.

(ii) For estimating the number of slum households or slum population in a stratum

sub-stratum possessing a characteristic:

n

yL

bn

NY

iia

i

a ia1 1

1ˆ

where iay is taken as the number of households/ population possessing the

characteristic y belonging to the a-th slum of i-th sample block.

Overall Estimate for Aggregates for a sub-stratum:

Overall estimate for aggregates for a sub-stratum ( stY ) based on all sub-samples in a sub-

stratum is obtained as:

(i) For sub-stratum with 2 sub-samples:

2

ˆ2

1ˆ

1mstmst YY

(ii) For sub-stratum with 3 sub-samples:

3

ˆ3

1ˆ

1mstmst YY


Overall Estimate for Aggregates for a stratum:

Overall estimate for a stratum ( sY ) will be obtained as

t

sts YY ˆˆ

Overall Estimate of Aggregates at State/UT/all-India level:

The overall estimate Y at the State/ UT/ all-India level is obtained by summing the stratum

estimates sY over all strata belonging to the State/ UT/ all-India.

Estimates of Ratios:

Let Y and X be the overall estimates of the aggregates Y and X for two characteristics y

and x respectively at the State/ UT/ all-India level.

Then the combined ratio estimate )ˆ(R of the ratio )(X

YR will be obtained as

X

YR

ˆ

ˆˆ

.

Estimates of Error: The estimated variances of the above estimates will be as follows:

For aggregate Y : s t

st

s

s YraVYraVYraV )ˆ(ˆ)ˆ(ˆ)ˆ(ˆ where )ˆ(ˆ stYraV is given

by

(i) for sub-stratum with 2 sub-samples:

221ˆˆ

4

1ˆˆ ststst YYYrVa , where 1ˆstY and 2

ˆstY are the estimates for sub-sample

1 and sub-sample 2 respectively for stratum ‘s’ and sub-stratum ‘t’.

(ii) for sub-stratum with 3 sub-samples:

3

1

2

321

3

ˆˆˆˆ

6

1ˆˆm

ststststmst

YYYYYrVa , where stmY is the

estimate for sub-sample ‘m’ for stratum ‘s’ and sub-stratum ‘t’.


For ratio R :

s t

st RESMRESM )ˆ(ˆ)ˆ(ˆ

where )ˆ(ˆ RESM st is given by

(i) for sub-stratum with 2 sub-samples:

2121

2

2122

212ˆˆˆˆˆ2ˆˆˆˆˆ

ˆ4

1)ˆ(ˆ

ststststststststst XXYYRXXRYYX

RESM

(ii) for sub-stratum with 3 sub-samples:

)ˆ(ˆ RESM st

23

123

1

23

12 3

ˆ

ˆˆ3

ˆ

ˆˆ6

1

mstm

stmm

mstm

stm

X

XR

Y

YX

3

ˆ

ˆ3

ˆ

ˆˆ2

3

1

3

1 mstm

stmm

stm

stm

X

X

Y

YR


Estimates of Relative Standard Error (RSE):

100

ˆ

ˆˆˆˆ

Y

YraVYESR

100

ˆ

ˆˆˆˆ

R

RESMRESR

Multipliers:

The formulae for multipliers at stratum/sub-stratum/second-stage stratum/ slum

level for a sub-sample and schedule type are given below:

Sch

type Sector

Formula for multipliers

hg / sb 1 hg / sb 2

0.0

Rural

stmistm

st

zn

Z 1 *1

stmistmistm

st Dzn

Z

Urban

stm

st

n

N

*stmistm

stD

n

N

1.2

Rural

jstmi

jstmi

stmistmj

st

h

H

zn

Z

1

11

jstmi

jstmi

stmistmistmj

st

h

HD

zn

Z

2

2*1

Urban

jstmi

jstmi

stmj

st

h

H

n

N

1

1 ,

jstmi

jstmistmi

stmj

st

h

HD

n

N

2

2* ,

( j = 1, 2, 3)


Note: (i) For estimating any characteristic for any domain not specifically considered in

sample design, indicator variable may be used.

(ii) Multipliers have to be computed on the basis of information available in the

listing schedule irrespective of any misclassification observed between the

listing schedule and detailed enquiry schedule.

(iii) For estimating number of villages possessing a characteristic, *

stmiD = 0 in the

relevant multipliers and there will be only one multiplier for the village .

Treatment for zero cases, casualty cases etc.:

While counting the number of FSUs surveyed (nsm or nstm ) in a stratum/sub-stratum,

all the FSUs with survey codes 1 to 6 in schedule 0.0 will be considered. In addition, if no

SSU is available in the frame for a particular schedule then also that FSU will be treated as

surveyed in respect of that schedule. However, if the SSUs of a particular schedule type are

available in the frame of the FSU but none of these could be surveyed then that FSU has to be

treated as casualty and it will not be treated as surveyed in respect of that schedule.

Casualty cases: FSUs with survey code 7 as per schedule 0.0 are treated as casualties.

In addition to this, an FSU, although surveyed, may have to be treated as casualty for a

particular schedule type and a particular second stage stratum as given in the following para:

FSUs with survey codes 1 or 4 as per schedule 0.0 having number of households in the

frame of j-th second stage stratum greater than 0 but number of households surveyed according

to data file, considering both hg/sb together, as nil (i.e. Hi1j + Hi2j >0 but hi1j + hi2j =0)

will be taken as casualties for j-th second stage stratum.


All the FSUs with survey codes 1 to 6 as per schedule 0.0 minus the number of casualties

as identified above will be taken as the number of surveyed FSUs (nstmj ) for that (stratum/sub-

stratum) ×( second stage stratum).

When casualty for j-th second stage stratum occurs for a particular hg/sb but not for the other

hg/sb, the FSU will not be treated as casualty but some adjustments in the value of H for the

other hg/sb will be done as follows:

(i) Suppose for hg/sb 1, Hi1j > 0 but hi1j = 0 while for hg/sb 2, Hi2j > 0 and hi2j > 0.

In that case jii HD 2

* will be replaced by )( 2

*

1 jiiji HDH in the formula for

multiplier of hg/sb 2.

(ii) Suppose for hg/sb 1, Hi1j>0 and hi1j > 0 while for hg/sb 2, Hi2j>0 but hi2j=0. In that case

jiH

1 will be replaced by )(

2

*

1 jiijiHDH in the formula for multiplier of hg/sb

1.

It may be noted that nsmj or nstmj would be same for hg/sb 1 & 2 of an FSU.

Treatment in cases of void second-stage strata/sub-strata /strata/NSS region at FSU or

household level

A stratum/sub-stratum may be void because of the casualty of all the FSUs belonging

to the stratum/sub-stratum. This may occur in one sub-sample or in both the sub-samples. If it

relates to only one sub-sample, then estimate for the void stratum/sub-stratum may be replaced

with the estimate as obtained from the other sub-sample for the same stratum/sub-stratum.

When a stratum/sub-stratum is void in both the sub-samples, the following procedure

is recommended:


Case (I): Stratum/Sub-stratum void cases at FSU levels (i.e. all FSUs having survey code

7):

(i) If a rural sub-stratum is void then it may be merged with the other sub-stratum

of the stratum.

(ii) If a rural/urban stratum (district) is void due to all FSUs being casualty, it may

be excluded from the coverage of the survey. The state level estimates will be

based on the estimates of districts for which estimates are available and remarks

to that effect may be added in appropriate places.

Case (II): Stratum/Sub-stratum void case at second stage stratum level (i.e.all the FSUs

are casualties for a particular second stage stratum):

An FSU may be a casualty for a particular second stage stratum although survey

code is not 7. If all the FSUs of a stratum/sub-stratum become casualties in this

manner for a particular second stage stratum, the stratum/sub-stratum will

become void. In such cases, sub-strata will be merged with other sub-strata for all

the second stage strata as in Case (I) above.

However, if whole district/stratum becomes void in this manner for a particular

second stage stratum, adjustment for this type of stratum void case may be done

according to the following guidelines.

The adjustment will be made involving other strata/sub-strata (within NSS region)

of the State/U.T. Suppose A, B, C and D are the four strata in the

State/UT/Region and stratum C is void for j-th second stage stratum.

If ajY , bjY and djY are the aggregate estimates for the strata/sub-strata A, B and

D respectively, then the estimate cjY for stratum/sub-stratum C may be obtained


as

c

dba

djbjajZ

ZZZ

YYY ˆˆˆ

where Za, Zb, Zc and Zd are the sizes of strata

A, B, C and D respectively.

Reference to the values of Zst, Ns, nst, ns, zsti, Dsti, D*sti, Dsi, D*si, Hsti1j,

hsti1j, Hsti2j, hsti2j:

(a) Values of Zst, Nst and allotted nst for the whole round are given in appendix Table

2 for rural sector and in Table 3 for urban sector.

(b) nst should not be taken from the tables. The values of nstm for each sub-sample are

to be obtained following the guidelines given in para 6 above. It includes

uninhibited and zero cases but excludes casualty cases.

(c) The value of zsti is to be taken from the column of sample list under the heading

“frame population” for rural samples.

(d) Value of Dsti is to be taken from item 16 of block 1, sch 0.0. D*sti is to be

calculated from the value of Dsti .

(e) Values of Hsti1j, Hsti2j are to be taken from col.(5), block 6 of sch 0.0 for respective

hg/sb and second-stage stratum.

(f) The value of hsti1j and hsti2j should not be taken from col (9), block 6 of sch.0.0.

The figures should be obtained by counting the number of households in the data

file excluding the casualty households.


Appendix B

Annexure Tables (MR method)


Annexure 1 : Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in rural Odisha, State sample

District


Estim

ate

d(0

0)

household

s

Sam

ple

household

s

Exclu

siv

e

use o

f th

e

household

Com

mon u

se o

f household

s in

the b

uild

ing

Neig

hbour's s

ourc

e

Com

munity u

se

Oth

ers

All

inclu

din

g N

R

Bargarh 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 3366 96

Jharsuguda 11 0 0 989 0 1000 746 24

Sambalpur 0 5 0 995 0 1000 1584 48

Deogarh 27 0 0 973 0 1000 675 24

Sundargarh 94 0 0 906 0 1000 2576 96

Keonjhar 116 196 60 629 0 1000 3324 120

Mayurbhanj 177 63 53 707 0 1000 5245 120

Balasore 461 13 42 484 0 1000 3940 120

Bhadrak 208 21 72 700 0 1000 2579 96

Kendrapara 232 0 0 768 0 1000 2746 96

Jagatsinghpur 419 36 80 464 0 1000 2380 72

Cuttack 199 118 26 657 0 1000 3434 120

Jajpur 134 251 174 441 0 1000 3560 120

Dhenkanal 167 151 41 641 0 1000 2358 96

Angul 182 46 7 764 0 1000 2601 72

Nayagarh 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 2104 72

Khurda 351 156 48 444 0 1000 2249 96

Puri 215 101 18 665 0 1000 2839 120

Ganjam 68 0 0 923 9 1000 5583 144

Gajapati 50 0 0 950 0 1000 1091 48

Kandhamal 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 1749 48

Boudh 27 25 0 948 0 1000 1050 48

Subarnapur 12 0 21 967 0 1000 1264 48

Balangir 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 3829 120

Nuapada 258 0 0 742 0 1000 1162 48

Kalahandi 4 0 0 996 0 1000 3010 120

Rayagada 1 0 0 653 346 1000 1928 72

Nabarangpur 7 21 0 973 0 1000 2025 96

Koraput 35 15 0 799 151 1000 2708 96

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 1224 36

Odisha 132 49 27 776 15 1000 74931 2532


Annexure 2 : Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in Rural Odisha, Central Sample

District


Estim

ate

d(0

0)

household

s

Sam

ple

household

s

Exclu

siv

e

use o

f th

e

household

Com

mon u

se o

f household

s in

the b

uild

ing

Neig

hbours

sourc

e

Com

munity u

se

Oth

ers

All

inclu

din

g (

n.r

)

Bargarh 13 5 105 877 0 1000 3432 96

Jharsuguda 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 789 24

Sambalpur 140 0 0 823 37 1000 1886 48

Deogarh 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 692 24

Sundargarh 84 22 3 890 0 1000 2859 96

Keonjhar 41 19 21 919 0 1000 3672 120

Mayurbhanj 90 52 118 676 64 1000 5257 120

Balasore 196 111 25 668 0 1000 4284 120

Bhadrak 170 287 108 436 0 1000 2727 96

Kendrapara 64 0 0 936 0 1000 2794 96

Jagatsinghpur 373 162 69 396 0 1000 2216 72

Cuttack 180 40 54 726 0 1000 4430 120

Jajpur 168 86 158 575 14 1000 3962 120

Dhenkanal 43 98 133 726 0 1000 2699 96

Angul 189 13 0 798 0 1000 2465 72

Nayagarh 4 44 51 860 41 1000 2069 72

Khurda 375 191 88 347 0 1000 2154 96

Puri 198 179 104 518 0 1000 2736 120

Ganjam 93 4 2 901 0 1000 6278 144

Gajapati 0 0 0 848 152 1000 1243 48

Kandhamal 292 0 84 359 265 1000 1298 40

Boudh 161 64 16 758 0 1000 1108 48

Subarnapur 37 175 34 755 0 1000 1315 48

Balangir 3 11 0 969 18 1000 3523 120

Nuapada 37 19 0 944 0 1000 1320 48

Kalahandi 68 284 0 560 87 1000 4406 120

Rayagada 0 188 0 812 0 1000 2247 72

Nabarangpur 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 2416 96

Koraput 0 244 1 755 0 1000 3380 72

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 1014 24

Odisha 105 84 45 748 19 1000 80672 2488


Annexure 3 : Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of

drinking water in rural Odisha, Pooled sample

District

Access to the principal source of drinking

water

Est

imat

ed

(00

) h

ou

seho

lds

Sam

ple

h

ou

seho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se o

f th

e

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s so

urc

e

Co

mm

un

ity

u

se

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g n

r

Bargarh 7 3 53 938 0 1000 3399 192

Jharsuguda 5 0 0 995 0 1000 768 48

Sambalpur 76 2 0 902 20 1000 1735 96

Deogarh 13 0 0 987 0 1000 683 48

Sundargarh 89 12 2 898 0 1000 2718 192

Keonjhar 77 103 40 781 0 1000 3498 240

Mayurbhanj 133 58 85 692 32 1000 5251 240

Balasore 323 64 33 580 0 1000 4112 240

Bhadrak 188 157 90 564 0 1000 2653 192

Kendrapara 147 0 0 853 0 1000 2770 192

Jagatsinghpur 397 97 75 431 0 1000 2298 144

Cuttack 188 74 42 696 0 1000 3932 240

Jajpur 152 164 165 512 7 1000 3761 240

Dhenkanal 101 123 90 686 0 1000 2528 192

Angul 186 30 4 781 0 1000 2533 144

Nayagarh 2 22 25 931 20 1000 2087 144

Khurda 363 173 68 397 0 1000 2202 192

Puri 207 139 61 593 0 1000 2788 240

Ganjam 81 2 1 911 4 1000 5931 288

Gajapati 23 0 0 896 81 1000 1167 96

Kandhamal 124 0 36 727 113 1000 1524 88

Boudh 96 45 8 851 0 1000 1079 96

Subarnapur 25 89 28 859 0 1000 1289 96

Balangir 1 5 0 985 8 1000 3676 240

Nuapada 141 10 0 850 0 1000 1241 96

Kalahandi 42 169 0 737 52 1000 3708 240

Rayagada 0 101 0 739 160 1000 2088 144

Nabarangpur 3 9 0 988 0 1000 2221 192

Koraput 16 142 1 775 67 1000 3044 168

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 1119 60

Odisha 118 67 36 762 17 1000 77802 5020


Annexure 4: Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in urban Odisha, state sample

District


Estim

ate

d(0

0)

household

s

Sam

ple

household

s

Exclu

siv

e

use o

f th

e

household

Com

mon u

se o

f household

s in

the b

uild

ing

Neig

hbour's s

ourc

e

Com

munity u

se

Oth

ers

All

inclu

din

g n

r

Bargarh 418 275 4 299 5 1000 717 48

Jharsuguda 273 123 0 604 0 1000 493 48

Sambalpur 295 281 187 237 0 1000 743 48

Deogarh 19 277 0 704 0 1000 62 24

Sundargarh 234 30 0 733 2 1000 1066 72

Keonjhar 169 133 41 531 127 1000 586 48

Mayurbhanj 648 241 0 111 0 1000 239 24

Balasore 240 413 0 347 0 1000 1145 24

Bhadrak 123 72 0 805 0 1000 353 24

Kendrapara 605 175 0 220 0 1000 103 24

Jagatsinghpur 394 353 20 226 7 1000 240 48

Cuttack 101 7 22 870 0 1000 1867 72

Jajpur 509 174 138 179 0 1000 237 24

Dhenkanal 148 684 0 168 0 1000 336 24

Angul 372 231 120 278 0 1000 473 48

Nayagarh 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 91 24

Khurda 619 136 2 243 0 1000 3314 72

Puri 849 127 4 19 0 1000 646 24

Ganjam 529 184 0 287 0 1000 1300 48

Gajapati 0 439 0 561 0 1000 117 24

Kandhamal 245 428 0 327 0 1000 116 24

Boudh 590 110 37 264 0 1000 51 24

Subarnapur 97 0 12 891 0 1000 90 24

Balangir 6 6 0 987 0 1000 588 48

Nuapada 928 0 0 72 0 1000 59 24

Kalahandi 286 33 0 681 0 1000 300 24

Rayagada 249 0 15 736 0 1000 294 24

Nabarangpur 235 0 53 712 0 1000 178 24

Koraput 803 8 72 117 0 1000 772 24

Malkangiri 454 286 16 243 0 1000 97 24

Odisha 387 154 23 431 5 1000 16674 1056


Annexure 5 : Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in urban Odisha , Central Sample

District


Esti

mate

d(0

0)

ho

us

eh

old

s

Sam

ple

ho

us

eh

old

s

Exclu

siv

e u

se o

f th

e

ho

us

eh

old

Co

mm

on

us

e o

f h

ou

seh

old

s

in t

he b

uil

din

g

Neig

hb

ou

r’s

so

urc

e

Co

mm

un

ity u

se

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g N

R

Bargarh 234 662 47 57 0 1000 310 48

Jharsuguda 223 647 3 124 3 1000 1228 48

Sambalpur 446 137 0 417 0 1000 1060 48

Deogarh 58 127 0 814 0 1000 64 24

Sundargarh 449 356 7 188 0 1000 1777 72

Keonjhar 210 94 0 697 0 1000 320 48

Mayurbhanj 381 59 250 310 0 1000 496 24

Balasore 127 145 8 720 0 1000 416 24

Bhadrak 112 417 212 259 0 1000 358 24

Kendrapara 61 490 135 288 26 1000 238 24

Jagatsinghpur 274 527 41 158 0 1000 209 48

Cuttack 702 209 46 43 0 1000 1483 72

Jajpur 466 510 0 24 0 1000 153 24

Dhenkanal 293 197 0 510 0 1000 153 24

Angul 795 5 0 200 0 1000 258 48

Nayagarh 36 57 0 907 0 1000 112 24

Khurda 326 591 2 81 0 1000 2226 72

Puri 67 933 0 0 0 1000 380 24

Ganjam 276 393 40 292 0 1000 1140 48

Gajapati 538 19 161 282 0 1000 120 24

Kandhamal 439 117 131 313 0 1000 78 24

Boudh 417 0 0 583 0 1000 22 24

Subarnapur 22 136 0 842 0 1000 97 24

Balangir 217 207 66 505 5 1000 363 48

Nuapada 347 172 0 480 0 1000 54 24

Kalahandi 322 256 156 266 0 1000 235 24

Rayagada 531 349 0 120 0 1000 298 24

Nabarangpur 505 0 0 495 0 1000 126 24

Koraput 593 0 0 407 0 1000 323 24

Malkangiri 444 470 0 86 0 1000 95 24

Odisha 367 362 34 235 1 1000 14192 1056


Annexure 6 : Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of drinking water in urban Odisha, pooled sample

District


Esti

mat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Excl

usi

ve u

se o

f th

e

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ildin

g

Nei

ghb

ou

r's

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

incl

ud

ing

nr

Bargarh 363 402 17 216 2 1000 493 96

Jharsuguda 234 510 2 253 2 1000 833 96

Sambalpur 415 211 59 314 0 1000 785 96

Deogarh 39 202 0 760 0 1000 63 48

Sundargarh 391 213 3 392 1 1000 1303 144

Keonjhar 180 119 27 591 83 1000 445 96

Mayurbhanj 468 118 169 245 0 1000 368 48

Balasore 210 341 2 446 0 1000 781 48

Bhadrak 117 246 107 530 0 1000 355 48

Kendrapara 225 395 94 267 18 1000 170 48

Jagatsinghpur 337 459 33 168 3 1000 201 96

Cuttack 370 98 32 501 0 1000 1648 144

Jajpur 492 306 84 118 0 1000 195 48

Dhenkanal 193 532 0 275 0 1000 245 48

Angul 545 157 81 217 0 1000 350 96

Nayagarh 20 31 0 949 0 1000 102 48

Khurda 508 323 2 166 0 1000 2715 144

Puri 559 426 3 12 0 1000 513 48

Ganjam 411 281 19 289 0 1000 1220 96

Gajapati 272 227 81 420 0 1000 119 48

Kandhamal 323 303 53 321 0 1000 97 48

Boudh 538 77 26 360 0 1000 37 48

Subarnapur 58 71 6 866 0 1000 93 48

Balangir 88 80 23 807 1 1000 433 96

Nuapada 650 82 0 267 0 1000 56 48

Kalahandi 302 131 68 499 0 1000 267 48

Rayagada 391 176 8 426 0 1000 296 48

Nabarangpur 347 0 31 622 0 1000 152 48

Koraput 741 6 51 203 0 1000 548 48

Malkangiri 449 377 8 165 0 1000 96 48

Odisha 384 252 27 334 3 1000 14979 2112


Annexure 7 : Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in Odisha, State sample

District


Esti

mat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Excl

usi

ve u

se o

f th

e

ho

use

ho

ld

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ildin

g

Nei

ghb

ou

r's

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

incl

ud

ing

nr

Bargarh 73 48 1 877 1 1000 4083 144

Jharsuguda 115 49 0 836 0 1000 1240 72

Sambalpur 94 93 60 753 0 1000 2328 96

Deogarh 27 23 0 950 0 1000 737 48

Sundargarh 135 9 0 856 1 1000 3643 168

Keonjhar 124 186 57 614 19 1000 3910 168

Mayurbhanj 198 71 50 681 0 1000 5485 144

Balasore 411 103 32 453 0 1000 5086 144

Bhadrak 197 27 63 713 0 1000 2931 120

Kendrapara 245 6 0 748 0 1000 2848 120

Jagatsinghpur 417 65 75 442 1 1000 2620 120

Cuttack 164 79 25 732 0 1000 5301 192

Jajpur 157 246 172 425 0 1000 3797 144

Dhenkanal 165 218 36 582 0 1000 2694 120

Angul 212 74 25 689 0 1000 3073 120

Nayagarh 0 0 0 1000 0 1000 2196 96

Khurda 511 144 21 324 0 1000 5563 168

Puri 333 106 16 546 0 1000 3485 144

Ganjam 155 35 0 803 7 1000 6883 192

Gajapati 45 43 0 912 0 1000 1208 72

Kandhamal 15 27 0 958 0 1000 1865 72

Boudh 53 29 2 916 0 1000 1102 72

Subarnapur 18 0 20 962 0 1000 1354 72

Balangir 1 1 0 998 0 1000 4417 168

Nuapada 290 0 0 710 0 1000 1221 72

Kalahandi 30 3 0 967 0 1000 3310 144

Rayagada 34 0 2 664 300 1000 2222 96

Nabarangpur 25 19 4 952 0 1000 2203 120

Koraput 205 14 16 648 117 1000 3480 120

Malkangiri 33 21 1 945 0 1000 1321 60

Odisha 178 68 26 714 13 1000 91605 3588


Annexure 8 : Per 1000 distribution of access to the principal source of drinking water in Odisha, Central sample

District

access to the principal source of drinking water

Esti

mat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Excl

usi

ve u

se o

f th

e

ho

use

ho

ld

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ildin

g

Nei

ghb

ou

r’s

so

urc

e

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

All

incl

ud

ing

nr

Bargarh 32 60 100 809 0 1000 3742 144

Jharsuguda 136 394 2 467 2 1000 2017 72

Sambalpur 250 49 0 677 23 1000 2945 96

Deogarh 5 11 0 984 0 1000 755 48

Sundargarh 224 150 4 621 0 1000 4636 168

Keonjhar 55 25 20 901 0 1000 3992 168

Mayurbhanj 115 53 129 645 59 1000 5754 144

Balasore 190 114 23 673 0 1000 4701 144

Bhadrak 163 302 120 415 0 1000 3086 120

Kendrapara 64 38 11 885 2 1000 3032 120

Jagatsinghpur 365 193 67 376 0 1000 2425 120

Cuttack 311 82 52 554 0 1000 5913 192

Jajpur 179 102 152 554 13 1000 4115 144

Dhenkanal 57 103 126 714 0 1000 2852 120

Angul 246 12 0 742 0 1000 2723 120

Nayagarh 5 45 49 863 39 1000 2182 96

Khurda 350 394 44 212 0 1000 4379 168

Puri 182 271 92 455 0 1000 3116 144

Ganjam 121 64 8 807 0 1000 7418 192

Gajapati 47 2 14 799 138 1000 1362 72

Kandhamal 300 7 87 357 250 1000 1376 64

Boudh 166 63 16 754 0 1000 1130 72

Subarnapur 36 172 32 761 0 1000 1412 72

Balangir 23 29 6 926 16 1000 3886 168

Nuapada 50 25 0 926 0 1000 1374 72

Kalahandi 81 283 8 545 83 1000 4640 144

Rayagada 62 207 0 731 0 1000 2545 96

Nabarangpur 25 0 0 975 0 1000 2542 120

Koraput 52 223 1 725 0 1000 3703 96

Malkangiri 38 40 0 922 0 1000 1109 48

Odisha 144 125 43 672 16 1000 94864 3544


Annexure 9 : Per 1000 distribution of households by nature of access to the principal source of

drinking water in Odisha , Pooled Sample

District


Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

h

ou

seho

lds

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se o

f

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in

the

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

u

se

Oth

ers

All

in

clu

din

g n

r

Bargarh 52 53 48 846 0 1000 3892 288

Jharsuguda 124 265 1 608 1 1000 1601 144

Sambalpur 182 67 18 719 14 1000 2520 192

Deogarh 16 17 0 967 0 1000 746 96

Sundargarh 187 77 2 734 0 1000 4021 336

Keonjhar 88 105 38 759 9 1000 3943 336

Mayurbhanj 155 62 91 662 30 1000 5619 288

Balasore 305 108 28 559 0 1000 4893 288

Bhadrak 180 168 92 560 0 1000 3008 240

Kendrapara 152 23 5 819 1 1000 2940 240

Jagatsinghpur 392 126 72 410 0 1000 2499 240

Cuttack 242 81 39 638 0 1000 5580 384

Jajpur 168 171 161 492 7 1000 3956 288

Dhenkanal 109 159 82 650 0 1000 2773 240

Angul 229 45 13 712 0 1000 2882 240

Nayagarh 3 22 24 932 19 1000 2189 192

Khurda 443 256 31 269 0 1000 4917 336

Puri 262 184 52 503 0 1000 3301 288

Ganjam 137 50 4 805 4 1000 7151 384

Gajapati 46 21 8 852 73 1000 1285 144

Kandhamal 136 18 37 703 106 1000 1620 136

Boudh 110 46 9 834 0 1000 1116 144

Subarnapur 27 88 26 859 0 1000 1383 144

Balangir 10 13 2 966 8 1000 4109 336

Nuapada 163 13 0 824 0 1000 1297 144

Kalahandi 60 166 5 721 48 1000 3975 288

Rayagada 49 110 1 700 140 1000 2384 192

Nabarangpur 25 9 2 964 0 1000 2373 240

Koraput 126 121 8 687 57 1000 3591 216

Malkangiri 35 30 1 934 0 1000 1215 108

Odisha 161 97 35 693 15 1000 92780 7132


Annexure 10 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in rural Odisha,

State sample

District

Facility of bathroom No Of Households

Attached Detached No bathroom All(inc nr) Estimated(00) Sample

Bargarh 98 31 871 1000 3366 96

Jharsuguda 13 9 978 1000 746 24

Sambalpur 21 23 956 1000 1584 48

Deogarh 0 0 1000 1000 675 24

Sundargarh 23 100 877 1000 2576 96

Keonjhar 0 32 968 1000 3324 120

Mayurbhanj 30 23 947 1000 5245 120

Balasore 33 0 967 1000 3940 120

Bhadrak 30 104 866 1000 2579 96

Kendrapara 283 29 688 1000 2746 96

Jagatsinghpur 0 72 928 1000 2380 72

Cuttack 17 400 583 1000 3434 120

Jajpur 43 114 843 1000 3560 120

Dhenkanal 95 63 842 1000 2358 96

Angul 36 47 917 1000 2601 72

Nayagarh 6 38 956 1000 2104 72

Khurda 0 597 403 1000 2249 96

Puri 106 35 859 1000 2839 120

Ganjam 0 73 927 1000 5583 144

Gajapati 6 50 944 1000 1091 48

Kandhamal 0 0 1000 1000 1749 48

Boudh 27 0 973 1000 1050 48

Subarnapur 0 0 1000 1000 1264 48

Balangir 1 45 954 1000 3829 120

Nuapada 3 5 991 1000 1162 48

Kalahandi 1 57 943 1000 3010 120

Rayagada 6 62 932 1000 1928 72

Nabarangpur 0 11 989 1000 2025 96

Koraput 12 70 919 1000 2708 96

Malkangiri 0 0 1000 1000 1224 36

Odisha 33 78 888 1000 74931 2532


Annexure 11 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in rural Odisha,

Central Sample

District


Attached Detached No bathroom

All(inc

nr) Estimated(00)

Sample

Bargarh 0 55 945 1000 3432 96

Jharsuguda 0 0 1000 1000 789 24

Sambalpur 130 0 870 1000 1886 48

Deogarh 0 0 1000 1000 692 24

Sundargarh 41 36 923 1000 2859 96

Keonjhar 0 27 973 1000 3672 120

Mayurbhanj 1 67 931 1000 5257 120

Balasore 32 56 912 1000 4284 120

Bhadrak 10 48 942 1000 2727 96

Kendrapara 17 16 967 1000 2794 96

Jagatsinghpur 114 60 826 1000 2216 72

Cuttack 70 124 806 1000 4430 120

Jajpur 13 135 852 1000 3962 120

Dhenkanal 8 98 895 1000 2699 96

Angul 106 59 834 1000 2465 72

Nayagarh 118 55 827 1000 2069 72

Khurda 52 138 809 1000 2154 96

Puri 11 36 953 1000 2736 120

Ganjam 7 102 891 1000 6278 144

Gajapati 60 34 906 1000 1243 48

Kandhamal 17 20 963 1000 1298 40

Boudh 32 17 950 1000 1108 48

Subarnapur 6 47 948 1000 1315 48

Balangir 0 3 997 1000 3523 120

Nuapada 37 40 923 1000 1320 48

Kalahandi 15 417 569 1000 4406 120

Rayagada 108 125 767 1000 2247 72

Nabarangpur 10 0 990 1000 2416 96

Koraput 6 238 755 1000 3380 72

Malkangiri 0 0 1000 1000 1014 24

Odisha 30 88 882 1000 80672 2488


Annexure 12 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in

rural Odisha, Pooled Sample

District


Attached Detached No bathroom All (inc

nr)


Bargarh 49 43 908 1000 3399 192

Jharsuguda 6 4 989 1000 768 48

Sambalpur 80 10 909 1000 1735 96

Deogarh 0 0 1000 1000 683 48

Sundargarh 32 66 901 1000 2718 192

Keonjhar 0 29 971 1000 3498 240

Mayurbhanj 15 45 939 1000 5251 240

Balasore 33 29 938 1000 4112 240

Bhadrak 20 75 905 1000 2653 192

Kendrapara 149 22 829 1000 2770 192

Jagatsinghpur 55 66 879 1000 2298 144

Cuttack 47 244 709 1000 3932 240

Jajpur 27 125 848 1000 3761 240

Dhenkanal 48 82 870 1000 2528 192

Angul 70 53 877 1000 2533 144

Nayagarh 62 46 892 1000 2087 144

Khurda 26 373 602 1000 2202 192

Puri 60 36 905 1000 2788 240

Ganjam 4 88 908 1000 5931 288

Gajapati 35 42 924 1000 1167 96

Kandhamal 7 8 984 1000 1524 88

Boudh 30 9 961 1000 1079 96

Subarnapur 3 24 973 1000 1289 96

Balangir 1 25 974 1000 3676 240

Nuapada 22 24 955 1000 1241 96

Kalahandi 9 271 720 1000 3708 240

Rayagada 61 96 843 1000 2088 144

Nabarangpur 5 5 990 1000 2221 192

Koraput 9 163 828 1000 3044 168

Malkangiri 0 0 1000 1000 1119 60

Odisha 32 83 885 1000 77802 5020


Annexure 13 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in urban Odisha,

state sample

District


Attached Detached No

bathroom

All Estimated(00)

Sample (incl. n.r)

Bargarh 645 124 231 1000 717 48

Jharsuguda 436 0 564 1000 493 48

Sambalpur 411 218 372 1000 743 48

Deogarh 136 118 746 1000 62 24

Sundargarh 253 317 430 1000 1066 72

Keonjhar 17 282 701 1000 586 48

Mayurbhanj 689 81 230 1000 239 24

Balasore 478 55 467 1000 1145 24

Bhadrak 255 251 494 1000 353 24

Kendrapara 574 426 0 1000 103 24

Jagatsinghpur 460 0 540 1000 240 48

Cuttack 61 374 564 1000 1867 72

Jajpur 412 292 296 1000 237 24

Dhenkanal 729 29 242 1000 336 24

Angul 453 115 432 1000 473 48

Nayagarh 76 37 887 1000 91 24

Khurda 502 221 277 1000 3314 72

Puri 524 115 361 1000 646 24

Ganjam 576 158 266 1000 1300 48

Gajapati 559 60 381 1000 117 24

Kandhamal 640 50 311 1000 116 24

Boudh 73 556 371 1000 51 24

Subarnapur 154 107 739 1000 90 24

Balangir 69 251 681 1000 588 48

Nuapada 743 0 257 1000 59 24

Kalahandi 294 436 270 1000 300 24

Rayagada 412 257 331 1000 294 24

Nabarangpur 125 377 499 1000 178 24

Koraput 265 690 45 1000 772 24

Malkangiri 799 10 191 1000 97 24

Odisha 385 230 385 1000 16674 1056


Annexure 14 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in urban Odisha, Central

Sample

District


Attached Detached No bathroom All

Estimated(00) Sample (inc NR)

Bargarh 656 202 142 1000 310 48

Jharsuguda 586 258 156 1000 1228 48

Sambalpur 420 200 380 1000 1060 48

Deogarh 74 0 926 1000 64 24

Sundargarh 516 206 279 1000 1777 72

Keonjhar 171 142 686 1000 320 48

Mayurbhanj 123 566 310 1000 496 24

Balasore 86 410 504 1000 416 24

Bhadrak 34 231 735 1000 358 24

Kendrapara 445 212 324 1000 238 24

Jagatsinghpur 315 172 514 1000 209 48

Cuttack 387 431 182 1000 1483 72

Jajpur 927 73 0 1000 153 24

Dhenkanal 195 295 510 1000 153 24

Angul 800 86 114 1000 258 48

Nayagarh 208 302 490 1000 112 24

Khurda 374 540 86 1000 2226 72

Puri 35 575 389 1000 380 24

Ganjam 564 288 148 1000 1140 48

Gajapati 448 189 363 1000 120 24

Kandhamal 309 324 367 1000 78 24

Boudh 386 64 550 1000 22 24

Subarnapur 160 84 756 1000 97 24

Balangir 210 279 511 1000 363 48

Nuapada 520 66 415 1000 54 24

Kalahandi 156 644 200 1000 235 24

Rayagada 880 96 24 1000 298 24

Nabarangpur 529 0 471 1000 126 24

Koraput 925 0 75 1000 323 24

Malkangiri 453 534 13 1000 95 24

Odisha 423 318 259 1000 14192 1056


Annexure 15: Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in

urban Odisha, Pooled Sample


District Attached Detached No

bathroom All(inc n.r) Estimated(00) Sample

Bargarh 652 153 195 1000 493 96

Jharsuguda 547 189 263 1000 833 96

Sambalpur 457 221 322 1000 785 96

Deogarh 105 58 837 1000 63 48

Sundargarh 445 227 328 1000 1303 144

Keonjhar 67 232 701 1000 445 96

Mayurbhanj 307 409 284 1000 368 48

Balasore 373 149 477 1000 781 48

Bhadrak 144 241 616 1000 355 48

Kendrapara 484 277 226 1000 170 48

Jagatsinghpur 434 89 477 1000 201 96

Cuttack 208 401 391 1000 1648 144

Jajpur 614 206 180 1000 195 48

Dhenkanal 562 112 326 1000 245 48

Angul 601 99 300 1000 350 96

Nayagarh 149 183 668 1000 102 48

Khurda 457 350 193 1000 2715 144

Puri 343 285 372 1000 513 48

Ganjam 570 219 211 1000 1220 96

Gajapati 503 125 372 1000 119 48

Kandhamal 506 160 333 1000 97 48

Boudh 167 409 424 1000 37 48

Subarnapur 157 95 748 1000 93 48

Balangir 120 260 620 1000 433 96

Nuapada 636 31 332 1000 56 48

Kalahandi 234 527 239 1000 267 48

Rayagada 647 176 177 1000 296 48

Nabarangpur 292 221 487 1000 152 48

Koraput 460 486 54 1000 548 48

Malkangiri 628 270 103 1000 96 48

Odisha 410 271 319 1000 14979 2112


Annexure 16: Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in Odisha ,

State sample

District



All

(incl. N.R) Estimated(00)

Sample

Bargarh 194 47 759 1000 4083 144

Jharsuguda 181 5 813 1000 1240 72

Sambalpur 145 85 770 1000 2328 96

Deogarh 12 10 979 1000 737 48

Sundargarh 90 164 746 1000 3643 168

Keonjhar 2 69 928 1000 3910 168

Mayurbhanj 59 25 916 1000 5485 144

Balasore 133 12 854 1000 5086 144

Bhadrak 57 122 821 1000 2931 120

Kendrapara 294 43 663 1000 2848 120

Jagatsinghpur 42 65 893 1000 2620 120

Cuttack 32 391 577 1000 5301 192

Jajpur 66 125 809 1000 3797 144

Dhenkanal 174 59 767 1000 2694 120

Angul 100 57 842 1000 3073 120

Nayagarh 9 38 953 1000 2196 96

Khurda 299 373 328 1000 5563 168

Puri 184 50 767 1000 3485 144

Ganjam 109 89 803 1000 6883 192

Gajapati 60 51 889 1000 1208 72

Kandhamal 40 3 957 1000 1865 72

Boudh 29 26 945 1000 1102 72

Subarnapur 10 7 983 1000 1354 72

Balangir 10 72 917 1000 4417 168

Nuapada 39 5 956 1000 1221 72

Kalahandi 27 91 882 1000 3310 144

Rayagada 59 88 853 1000 2222 96

Nabarangpur 10 40 950 1000 2203 120

Koraput 68 207 725 1000 3480 120

Malkangiri 59 1 941 1000 1321 60

Odisha 98 106 797 1000 91605 3588


Annexure 17: Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in Odisha, Central

sample

District



All(incl

n.r) Estimated(00)

Sample

Bargarh 54 68 878 1000 3742 144

Jharsuguda 357 157 486 1000 2017 72

Sambalpur 235 72 694 1000 2945 96

Deogarh 6 0 994 1000 755 48

Sundargarh 223 101 676 1000 4636 168

Keonjhar 14 36 950 1000 3992 168

Mayurbhanj 12 110 878 1000 5754 144

Balasore 37 87 876 1000 4701 144

Bhadrak 13 70 918 1000 3086 120

Kendrapara 50 32 917 1000 3032 120

Jagatsinghpur 131 70 799 1000 2425 120

Cuttack 150 201 649 1000 5913 192

Jajpur 47 132 821 1000 4115 144

Dhenkanal 18 108 874 1000 2852 120

Angul 172 62 766 1000 2723 120

Nayagarh 123 67 810 1000 2182 96

Khurda 216 342 442 1000 4379 168

Puri 14 102 884 1000 3116 144

Ganjam 93 131 777 1000 7418 192

Gajapati 94 48 858 1000 1362 72

Kandhamal 33 37 930 1000 1376 64

Boudh 39 18 943 1000 1130 72

Subarnapur 16 49 935 1000 1412 72

Balangir 20 29 952 1000 3886 168

Nuapada 56 41 903 1000 1374 72

Kalahandi 22 428 550 1000 4640 144

Rayagada 198 122 680 1000 2545 96

Nabarangpur 35 0 965 1000 2542 120

Koraput 87 217 696 1000 3703 96

Malkangiri 39 46 915 1000 1109 48

Odisha 89 122 789 1000 94864 3544


Annexure 18 : Per 1000 distribution of households by facility of bathroom in

Odisha, Pooled Sample

District


Attached Detached No bathroom All (inc

NR)


Bargarh 125 57 818 1000 3892 288

Jharsuguda 288 101 611 1000 1601 144

Sambalpur 198 76 726 1000 2520 192

Deogarh 9 5 986 1000 746 96

Sundargarh 166 118 716 1000 4021 336

Keonjhar 8 52 940 1000 3943 336

Mayurbhanj 35 69 896 1000 5619 288

Balasore 87 48 865 1000 4893 288

Bhadrak 34 95 871 1000 3008 240

Kendrapara 168 37 794 1000 2940 240

Jagatsinghpur 85 68 846 1000 2499 240

Cuttack 95 291 615 1000 5580 384

Jajpur 56 129 815 1000 3956 288

Dhenkanal 94 84 822 1000 2773 240

Angul 135 59 807 1000 2882 240

Nayagarh 66 53 882 1000 2189 192

Khurda 264 360 376 1000 4917 336

Puri 104 74 822 1000 3301 288

Ganjam 100 110 789 1000 7151 384

Gajapati 78 49 873 1000 1285 144

Kandhamal 37 18 946 1000 1620 136

Boudh 34 22 944 1000 1116 144

Subarnapur 13 29 958 1000 1383 144

Balangir 13 50 937 1000 4109 336

Nuapada 48 24 928 1000 1297 144

Kalahandi 24 288 688 1000 3975 288

Rayagada 134 106 760 1000 2384 192

Nabarangpur 24 19 958 1000 2373 240

Koraput 78 212 710 1000 3591 216

Malkangiri 50 21 929 1000 1215 108

Odisha 93 113 794 1000 92780 7132


Annexure 19: Households per thousand having no bathroom facility in rural Odisha

District


Central

Sample State

sample

Pooled

sample

Central

Sample State

sample

Pooled

sample

Central

Sample State

sample

Pooled

sample

Bargarh 945 871 908 142 231 195 878 759 818

Jharsuguda 1000 978 989 156 564 263 486 813 611

Sambalpur 870 956 909 380 372 322 694 770 726

Deogarh 1000 1000 1000 926 746 837 994 979 986

Sundargarh 923 877 901 279 430 328 676 746 716

Keonjhar 973 968 971 686 701 701 950 928 940

Mayurbhanj 931 947 939 310 230 284 878 916 896

Balasore 912 967 938 504 467 477 876 854 865

Bhadrak 942 866 905 735 494 616 918 821 871

Kendrapara 967 688 829 324 0 226 917 663 794

Jagatsinghpur 826 928 879 514 540 477 799 893 846

Cuttack 806 583 709 182 564 391 649 577 615

Jajpur 852 843 848 0 296 180 821 809 815

Dhenkanal 895 842 870 510 242 326 874 767 822

Angul 834 917 877 114 432 300 766 842 807

Nayagarh 827 956 892 490 887 668 810 953 882

Khurda 809 403 602 86 277 193 442 328 376

Puri 953 859 905 389 361 372 884 767 822

Ganjam 891 927 908 148 266 211 777 803 789

Gajapati 906 944 924 363 381 372 858 889 873

Kandhamal 963 1000 984 367 311 333 930 957 946

Boudh 950 973 961 550 371 424 943 945 944

Subarnapur 948 1000 973 756 739 748 935 983 958

Balangir 997 954 974 511 681 620 952 917 937

Nuapada 923 991 955 415 257 332 903 956 928

Kalahandi 569 943 720 200 270 239 550 882 688

Rayagada 767 932 843 24 331 177 680 853 760

Nabarangpur 990 989 990 471 499 487 965 950 958

Koraput 755 919 828 75 45 54 696 725 710

Malkangiri 1000 1000 1000 13 191 103 915 941 929

Odisha 882 888 885 259 385 319 789 797 794


Annexure 20 : Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in rural Odisha , State

Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

N R

No of households


Bargarh 193 0 0 807 1000 3366 96

Jharsuguda 22 0 0 978 1000 746 24

Sambalpur 48 0 0 952 1000 1584 48

Deogarh 158 0 0 842 1000 675 24

Sundargarh 144 0 0 856 1000 2576 96

Keonjhar 68 0 3 929 1000 3324 120

Mayurbhanj 211 6 0 783 1000 5245 120

Balasore 368 7 0 626 1000 3940 120

Bhadrak 161 0 0 839 1000 2579 96

Kendrapara 294 13 0 693 1000 2746 96

Jagatsinghpur 166 0 0 834 1000 2380 72

Cuttack 248 169 0 583 1000 3434 120

Jajpur 131 71 0 798 1000 3560 120

Dhenkanal 236 25 0 740 1000 2358 96

Angul 481 0 0 519 1000 2601 72

Nayagarh 102 0 0 898 1000 2104 72

Khurda 424 122 0 454 1000 2249 96

Puri 252 22 0 726 1000 2839 120

Ganjam 226 49 0 725 1000 5583 144

Gajapati 89 0 0 911 1000 1091 48

Kandhamal 8 0 0 992 1000 1749 48

Boudh 0 0 0 1000 1000 1050 48

Subarnapur 36 0 0 964 1000 1264 48

Balangir 57 1 0 941 1000 3829 120

Nuapada 87 0 0 913 1000 1162 48

Kalahandi 35 2 0 962 1000 3010 120

Rayagada 24 0 0 976 1000 1928 72

Nabarangpur 0 21 0 979 1000 2025 96

Koraput 87 15 0 897 1000 2708 96

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 1000 1224 36

Odisha 170 23 0 807 1000 74931 2532


Annexure 21 : Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in rural Odisha,

Central Sample

Access to latrine

District code

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

n.r

No of households


Bargarh 73 29 0 899 1000 3432 96

Jharsuguda 0 0 0 1000 1000 789 24

Sambalpur 148 0 29 822 1000 1886 48

Deogarh 0 0 0 1000 1000 692 24

Sundargarh 67 22 0 911 1000 2859 96

Keonjhar 89 0 0 911 1000 3672 120

Mayurbhanj 98 48 0 854 1000 5257 120

Balasore 175 62 13 751 1000 4284 120

Bhadrak 49 61 0 890 1000 2727 96

Kendrapara 192 0 0 791 1000 2794 96

Jagatsinghpur 260 31 0 708 1000 2216 72

Cuttack 217 19 7 757 1000 4430 120

Jajpur 136 37 14 814 1000 3962 120

Dhenkanal 76 114 0 809 1000 2699 96

Angul 206 13 5 776 1000 2465 72

Nayagarh 153 39 0 808 1000 2069 72

Khurda 154 58 18 770 1000 2154 96

Puri 73 36 21 870 1000 2736 120

Ganjam 274 1 0 725 1000 6278 144

Gajapati 282 0 0 718 1000 1243 48

Kandhamal 45 0 0 955 1000 1298 40

Boudh 60 64 0 861 1000 1108 48

Subarnapur 6 158 0 837 1000 1315 48

Balangir 87 33 0 879 1000 3523 120

Nuapada 37 19 21 923 1000 1320 48

Kalahandi 153 310 0 537 1000 4406 120

Rayagada 45 125 0 829 1000 2247 72

Nabarangpur 14 0 0 969 1000 2416 96

Koraput 6 238 0 755 1000 3380 72

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 1000 1014 24

Odisha 124 58 4 813 1000 80672 2488


Annexure 22: District wise Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in rural

Odisha, pooled sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common use

of households

in building

Others No

Latrine

All

including

N R

No of households


Bargarh 132 14 0 853 1000 3399 192

Jharsuguda 11 0 0 989 1000 768 48

Sambalpur 103 0 16 881 1000 1735 96

Deogarh 78 0 0 922 1000 683 48

Sundargarh 103 12 0 885 1000 2718 192

Keonjhar 79 0 1 920 1000 3498 240

Mayurbhanj 155 27 0 818 1000 5251 240

Balasore 267 35 7 691 1000 4112 240

Bhadrak 104 31 0 865 1000 2653 192

Kendrapara 242 6 0 743 1000 2770 192

Jagatsinghpur 212 15 0 773 1000 2298 144

Cuttack 230 85 4 681 1000 3932 240

Jajpur 134 53 7 806 1000 3761 240

Dhenkanal 150 73 0 777 1000 2528 192

Angul 347 7 2 644 1000 2533 144

Nayagarh 127 19 0 853 1000 2087 144

Khurda 292 91 9 609 1000 2202 192

Puri 164 29 10 797 1000 2788 240

Ganjam 251 24 0 725 1000 5931 288

Gajapati 192 0 0 808 1000 1167 96

Kandhamal 24 0 0 976 1000 1524 88

Boudh 31 33 0 929 1000 1079 96

Subarnapur 21 80 0 899 1000 1289 96

Balangir 72 17 0 912 1000 3676 240

Nuapada 61 10 11 918 1000 1241 96

Kalahandi 106 185 0 710 1000 3708 240

Rayagada 35 67 0 897 1000 2088 144

Nabarangpur 8 9 0 974 1000 2221 192

Koraput 42 139 0 819 1000 3044 168

Malkangiri 0 0 0 1000 1000 1119 60

Odisha 146 41 2 810 1000 77802 5020


Annexure 23: Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in urban Odisha ,

State Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common use

of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

n.r

No of households


Bargarh 596 173 0 231 1000 717 48

Jharsuguda 346 181 0 473 1000 493 48

Sambalpur 644 219 4 133 1000 743 48

Deogarh 529 179 0 292 1000 62 24

Sundargarh 322 109 0 569 1000 1066 72

Keonjhar 368 110 5 516 1000 586 48

Mayurbhanj 770 112 0 117 1000 239 24

Balasore 423 315 0 262 1000 1145 24

Bhadrak 364 149 0 487 1000 353 24

Kendrapara 596 404 0 0 1000 103 24

Jagatsinghpur 692 14 0 294 1000 240 48

Cuttack 415 370 0 215 1000 1867 72

Jajpur 587 251 0 162 1000 237 24

Dhenkanal 95 900 0 5 1000 336 24

Angul 699 133 0 168 1000 473 48

Nayagarh 494 0 0 506 1000 91 24

Khurda 639 247 0 114 1000 3314 72

Puri 749 0 15 237 1000 646 24

Ganjam 793 166 0 41 1000 1300 48

Gajapati 214 439 0 347 1000 117 24

Kandhamal 614 370 0 15 1000 116 24

Boudh 742 82 0 177 1000 51 24

Subarnapur 263 0 0 737 1000 90 24

Balangir 314 105 0 581 1000 588 48

Nuapada 742 74 112 72 1000 59 24

Kalahandi 780 0 0 220 1000 300 24

Rayagada 669 0 0 331 1000 294 24

Nabarangpur 793 103 0 104 1000 178 24

Koraput 882 16 72 30 1000 772 24

Malkangiri 719 80 0 201 1000 97 24

Odisha 561 204 5 230 1000 16674 1056


Annexure 24: Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in urban Odisha,

Central Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

n.r

No of households


Bargarh 780 163 9 48 1000 310 48

Jharsuguda 354 525 0 121 1000 1228 48

Sambalpur 538 121 0 340 1000 1060 48

Deogarh 358 64 0 578 1000 64 24

Sundargarh 540 283 0 177 1000 1777 72

Keonjhar 210 132 0 658 1000 320 48

Mayurbhanj 433 256 0 310 1000 496 24

Balasore 496 72 8 377 1000 416 24

Bhadrak 264 417 0 319 1000 358 24

Kendrapara 283 374 0 343 1000 238 24

Jagatsinghpur 232 367 218 183 1000 209 48

Cuttack 472 387 0 140 1000 1483 72

Jajpur 655 345 0 0 1000 153 24

Dhenkanal 377 118 0 504 1000 153 24

Angul 871 66 0 64 1000 258 48

Nayagarh 442 83 0 475 1000 112 24

Khurda 349 583 17 50 1000 2226 72

Puri 149 575 0 276 1000 380 24

Ganjam 873 127 0 0 1000 1140 48

Gajapati 637 0 0 363 1000 120 24

Kandhamal 914 43 0 43 1000 78 24

Boudh 641 0 0 359 1000 22 24

Subarnapur 281 60 0 659 1000 97 24

Balangir 400 200 46 353 1000 363 48

Nuapada 413 172 0 415 1000 54 24

Kalahandi 756 81 0 163 1000 235 24

Rayagada 651 349 0 0 1000 298 24

Nabarangpur 594 69 0 336 1000 126 24

Koraput 925 0 0 75 1000 323 24

Malkangiri 530 470 0 0 1000 95 24

Odisha 496 313 8 182 1000 14192 1056


Annexure 25: District wise Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in

urban Odisha , Pooled Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building

Others

No

latrine

All

including

n r

No of households


Bargarh 659 173 2 166 1000 493 96

Jharsuguda 347 438 0 215 1000 833 96

Sambalpur 604 168 2 226 1000 785 96

Deogarh 443 121 0 436 1000 63 48

Sundargarh 482 196 0 322 1000 1303 144

Keonjhar 310 118 4 569 1000 445 96

Mayurbhanj 543 210 0 247 1000 368 48

Balasore 442 250 2 293 1000 781 48

Bhadrak 314 284 0 402 1000 355 48

Kendrapara 378 383 0 239 1000 170 48

Jagatsinghpur 518 196 76 210 1000 201 96

Cuttack 442 384 0 174 1000 1648 144

Jajpur 614 288 0 98 1000 195 48

Dhenkanal 183 656 0 161 1000 245 48

Angul 785 106 0 109 1000 350 96

Nayagarh 465 46 0 489 1000 102 48

Khurda 526 383 7 84 1000 2715 144

Puri 526 213 9 251 1000 513 48

Ganjam 830 148 0 22 1000 1220 96

Gajapati 428 217 0 355 1000 119 48

Kandhamal 735 239 0 27 1000 97 48

Boudh 711 57 0 231 1000 37 48

Subarnapur 272 31 0 696 1000 93 48

Balangir 349 138 19 494 1000 433 96

Nuapada 585 121 58 236 1000 56 48

Kalahandi 769 36 0 195 1000 267 48

Rayagada 660 176 0 165 1000 296 48

Nabarangpur 711 89 0 200 1000 152 48

Koraput 895 11 51 43 1000 548 48

Malkangiri 626 273 0 101 1000 96 48

Odisha 537 255 6 201 1000 14979 2112


Annexure 26: Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in Odisha,

State Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

n.r

No of households


Bargarh 264 30 0 706 1000 4083 144

Jharsuguda 151 72 0 777 1000 1240 72

Sambalpur 239 70 1 690 1000 2328 96

Deogarh 189 15 0 796 1000 737 48

Sundargarh 196 32 0 772 1000 3643 168

Keonjhar 113 17 3 867 1000 3910 168

Mayurbhanj 235 11 0 754 1000 5485 144

Balasore 380 76 0 544 1000 5086 144

Bhadrak 186 18 0 796 1000 2931 120

Kendrapara 305 27 0 668 1000 2848 120

Jagatsinghpur 214 1 0 784 1000 2620 120

Cuttack 307 240 0 454 1000 5301 192

Jajpur 160 82 0 758 1000 3797 144

Dhenkanal 218 134 0 648 1000 2694 120

Angul 515 20 0 465 1000 3073 120

Nayagarh 118 0 0 882 1000 2196 96

Khurda 552 196 0 252 1000 5563 168

Puri 344 18 3 635 1000 3485 144

Ganjam 333 71 0 596 1000 6883 192

Gajapati 101 43 0 856 1000 1208 72

Kandhamal 46 23 0 931 1000 1865 72

Boudh 35 4 0 962 1000 1102 72

Subarnapur 51 0 0 949 1000 1354 72

Balangir 91 15 0 893 1000 4417 168

Nuapada 119 4 5 872 1000 1221 72

Kalahandi 103 2 0 895 1000 3310 144

Rayagada 109 0 0 891 1000 2222 96

Nabarangpur 64 27 0 909 1000 2203 120

Koraput 264 15 16 705 1000 3480 120

Malkangiri 53 6 0 941 1000 1321 60

Odisha 241 56 1 702 1000 91605 3588


Annexure 27 : Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in Odisha,

Central Sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building Others

No

Latrine

All

including

n.r

No of households

Estimated(00) sample Bargarh

131 40 1 828 1000 3742 144 Jharsuguda

215 320 0 465 1000 2017 72 Sambalpur

289 44 19 649 1000 2945 96 Deogarh

30 5 0 964 1000 755 48 Sundargarh

248 122 0 629 1000 4636 168 Keonjhar

99 11 0 891 1000 3992 168 Mayurbhanj

127 66 0 807 1000 5754 144 Balasore

203 63 12 718 1000 4701 144 Bhadrak

74 102 0 824 1000 3086 120 Kendrapara

199 29 0 756 1000 3032 120 Jagatsinghpur

258 60 19 663 1000 2425 120 Cuttack

281 111 5 602 1000 5913 192 Jajpur

155 48 14 784 1000 4115 144 Dhenkanal

92 115 0 793 1000 2852 120 Angul

269 18 5 708 1000 2723 120 Nayagarh

168 41 0 791 1000 2182 96 Khurda

253 325 18 404 1000 4379 168 Puri

82 102 19 797 1000 3116 144 Ganjam

366 20 0 614 1000 7418 192 Gajapati

314 0 0 686 1000 1362 72 Kandhamal

94 2 0 903 1000 1376 64 Boudh

71 63 0 851 1000 1130 72 Subarnapur

25 151 0 824 1000 1412 72 Balangir

117 49 4 830 1000 3886 168 Nuapada

52 25 21 903 1000 1374 72 Kalahandi

184 298 0 518 1000 4640 144 Rayagada

116 151 0 732 1000 2545 96 Nabarangpur

43 3 0 938 1000 2542 120 Koraput

87 217 0 696 1000 3703 96 Malkangiri

45 40 0 914 1000 1109 48 Odisha

180 96 5 718 1000 94864 3544


Annexure 28: Per 1000 distribution of households by access to latrine in Odisha,

Pooled sample

Access to latrine

District

Exclusive

use of the

household

Common

use of

households

in building

Others

No

Latrine

All

including

N R

No of households


Bargarh 199 35 0 766 1000 3892 288

Jharsuguda 186 228 0 586 1000 1601 144

Sambalpur 259 52 12 677 1000 2520 192

Deogarh 109 10 0 881 1000 746 96

Sundargarh 226 71 0 703 1000 4021 336

Keonjhar 105 13 2 880 1000 3943 336

Mayurbhanj 180 39 0 781 1000 5619 288

Balasore 295 70 6 627 1000 4893 288

Bhadrak 129 61 0 810 1000 3008 240

Kendrapara 250 28 0 713 1000 2940 240

Jagatsinghpur 236 30 6 728 1000 2499 240

Cuttack 293 173 3 531 1000 5580 384

Jajpur 157 64 7 771 1000 3956 288

Dhenkanal 153 124 0 723 1000 2773 240

Angul 400 19 2 579 1000 2882 240

Nayagarh 143 21 0 836 1000 2189 192

Khurda 421 252 8 319 1000 4917 336

Puri 221 57 10 712 1000 3301 288

Ganjam 350 45 0 605 1000 7151 384

Gajapati 214 20 0 766 1000 1285 144

Kandhamal 66 14 0 920 1000 1620 136

Boudh 53 34 0 906 1000 1116 144

Subarnapur 38 77 0 885 1000 1383 144

Balangir 101 30 2 868 1000 4109 336

Nuapada 83 15 13 888 1000 1297 144

Kalahandi 150 175 0 675 1000 3975 288

Rayagada 113 81 0 806 1000 2384 192

Nabarangpur 53 15 0 924 1000 2373 240

Koraput 172 120 8 700 1000 3591 216

Malkangiri 49 22 0 929 1000 1215 108

Odisha 209 75 3 712 1000 92780 7132


Annexure 29: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Rural Odisha, State Sample


type of structure average floor area(0.00 sq.mt.)

no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca

katcha all (incl.nr)

estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 273 318 409 1000 35.35 3366 96

JHARSUGUDA 78 922 0 1000 41.62 746 24

SAMBALPUR 95 867 38 1000 30.54 1584 48

DEOGARH 54 437 508 1000 32.03 675 24

SUNDARGARH 194 322 484 1000 49.28 2576 96

KEONJHAR 235 126 639 1000 41.92 3324 120

MAYURBHANJ 218 366 416 1000 51.14 5245 120

BALASORE 338 260 401 1000 40.77 3940 120

BHADRAK 230 117 654 1000 38.14 2579 96

KENDRAPARA 323 103 574 1000 33.38 2746 96

JAGATSINGHPUR 415 54 531 1000 28.38 2380 72

CUTTACK 557 243 199 1000 44.76 3434 120

JAJPUR 588 82 330 1000 28.71 3560 120

DHENKANAL 457 138 404 1000 35.51 2358 96

ANGUL 268 374 359 1000 63.89 2601 72

NAYAGARH 386 215 399 1000 26.89 2104 72

KHURDA 603 235 162 1000 65.41 2249 96

PURI 624 114 262 1000 42.99 2839 120

GANJAM 641 199 160 1000 41.53 5583 144

GAJAPATI 108 279 612 1000 43.22 1091 48

KANDHAMAL 244 382 374 1000 23.59 1749 48

BOUDH 137 134 730 1000 24.99 1050 48

SUBARNAPUR 188 407 405 1000 33.49 1264 48

BALANGIR 110 271 619 1000 27.32 3829 120

NUAPADA 95 524 382 1000 26.01 1162 48

KALAHANDI 98 859 44 1000 41.04 3010 120

RAYAGADA 160 228 612 1000 23.45 1928 72

NABARANGPUR 196 208 596 1000 30.85 2025 96

KORAPUT 133 202 665 1000 23.09 2708 96

MALKANGIRI 100 454 446 1000 34.28 1224 36

ODISHA 315 280 404 1000 38.22 74931 2532


Annexure 30: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Rural Odisha, Central Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 282 526 191 1000 22.7 3432 96

JHARSUGUDA 207 744 48 1000 32.51 789 24

SAMBALPUR 195 654 152 1000 36.36 1886 48

DEOGARH 37 759 204 1000 29.84 692 24

SUNDARGARH 169 831 0 1000 45.15 2859 96

KEONJHAR 166 651 184 1000 24.81 3672 120

MAYURBHANJ 109 466 424 1000 29.77 5257 120

BALASORE 235 345 420 1000 27.01 4284 120

BHADRAK 246 173 581 1000 33.93 2727 96

KENDRAPARA 319 74 607 1000 42.66 2794 96

JAGATSINGHPUR 589 90 321 1000 32.36 2216 72

CUTTACK 533 173 294 1000 67.7 4430 120

JAJPUR 416 113 471 1000 28.13 3962 120

DHENKANAL 441 159 400 1000 22.45 2699 96

ANGUL 554 77 369 1000 27.13 2465 72

NAYAGARH 409 94 497 1000 27.03 2069 72

KHURDA 534 142 324 1000 30.51 2154 96

PURI 470 103 428 1000 27.33 2736 120

GANJAM 732 75 192 1000 27.48 6278 144

GAJAPATI 549 231 220 1000 26.74 1243 48

KANDHAMAL 364 385 251 1000 29.11 1298 40

BOUDH 231 228 541 1000 23.01 1108 48

SUBARNAPUR 328 489 183 1000 24.45 1315 48

BALANGIR 143 730 128 1000 23.08 3523 120

NUAPADA 99 891 10 1000 27.55 1320 48

KALAHANDI 355 642 3 1000 24.65 4406 120

RAYAGADA 312 484 204 1000 30.53 2247 72

NABARANGPUR 119 536 344 1000 42.21 2416 96

KORAPUT 492 273 235 1000 26.22 3380 72

MALKANGIRI 0 818 182 1000 31.82 1014 24

ODISHA 350 362 288 1000 31.27 80672 2488


Annexure 31: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Rural Odisha, Pooled Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 278 423 299 1000 28.97 3399 192

JHARSUGUDA 144 831 25 1000 36.93 768 48

SAMBALPUR 149 751 100 1000 33.7 1735 96

DEOGARH 45 600 354 1000 30.93 683 48

SUNDARGARH 181 589 230 1000 47.1 2718 192

KEONJHAR 198 401 400 1000 32.94 3498 240

MAYURBHANJ 164 416 420 1000 40.44 5251 240

BALASORE 285 304 411 1000 33.6 4112 240

BHADRAK 238 146 616 1000 35.98 2653 192

KENDRAPARA 321 88 591 1000 38.06 2770 192

JAGATSINGHPUR 499 71 430 1000 30.3 2298 144

CUTTACK 544 204 253 1000 57.68 3932 240

JAJPUR 498 98 404 1000 28.41 3761 240

DHENKANAL 449 149 402 1000 28.54 2528 192

ANGUL 407 229 364 1000 46 2533 144

NAYAGARH 397 155 448 1000 26.96 2087 144

KHURDA 569 190 241 1000 48.34 2202 192

PURI 548 108 343 1000 35.3 2788 240

GANJAM 689 134 177 1000 34.1 5931 288

GAJAPATI 343 254 403 1000 34.44 1167 96

KANDHAMAL 295 383 321 1000 25.94 1524 88

BOUDH 185 182 633 1000 23.98 1079 96

SUBARNAPUR 259 449 292 1000 28.88 1289 96

BALANGIR 126 491 383 1000 25.29 3676 240

NUAPADA 97 719 184 1000 26.83 1241 96

KALAHANDI 251 730 19 1000 31.3 3708 240

RAYAGADA 242 366 392 1000 27.26 2088 144

NABARANGPUR 154 387 459 1000 37.03 2221 192

KORAPUT 332 241 426 1000 24.83 3044 168

MALKANGIRI 55 619 327 1000 33.16 1119 60

ODISHA 333 323 344 1000 34.62 77802 5020


Annexure 32: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Urban Odisha, State Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 760 121 119 1000 46.5 717 48

JHARSUGUDA 614 378 8 1000 32.49 493 48

SAMBALPUR 634 338 27 1000 39.61 743 48

DEOGARH 443 381 176 1000 28.58 62 24

SUNDARGARH 417 315 268 1000 66.45 1066 72

KEONJHAR 183 234 583 1000 37.62 586 48

MAYURBHANJ 883 87 30 1000 60.75 239 24

BALASORE 778 131 91 1000 61.31 1145 24

BHADRAK 686 0 314 1000 33.62 353 24

KENDRAPARA 1000 0 0 1000 33.19 103 24

JAGATSINGHPUR 717 92 191 1000 36.76 240 48

CUTTACK 524 467 9 1000 40.19 1867 72

JAJPUR 864 0 136 1000 39.54 237 24

DHENKANAL 995 3 3 1000 18.31 336 24

ANGUL 740 179 81 1000 81.5 473 48

NAYAGARH 840 129 31 1000 23.69 91 24

KHURDA 965 23 12 1000 67 3314 72

PURI 509 348 143 1000 98.21 646 24

GANJAM 1000 0 0 1000 39.52 1300 48

GAJAPATI 641 120 239 1000 44.42 117 24

KANDHAMAL 972 15 12 1000 35.01 116 24

BOUDH 714 179 107 1000 50.36 51 24

SUBARNAPUR 393 607 0 1000 27.56 90 24

BALANGIR 266 424 311 1000 25.66 588 48

NUAPADA 909 67 24 1000 38.77 59 24

KALAHANDI 30 970 0 1000 49.95 300 24

RAYAGADA 605 256 139 1000 30.12 294 24

NABARANGPUR 240 552 207 1000 36.73 178 24

KORAPUT 955 0 45 1000 40.34 772 24

MALKANGIRI 919 48 32 1000 49.34 97 24

ODISHA 708 197 94 1000 50.88 16674 1056


Annexure 33: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Urban Odisha, Central Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 971 29 0 1000 44.08 310 48

JHARSUGUDA 895 105 0 1000 30.26 1228 48

SAMBALPUR 612 349 39 1000 34.68 1060 48

DEOGARH 615 385 0 1000 33.56 64 24

SUNDARGARH 891 109 0 1000 40.1 1777 72

KEONJHAR 292 372 336 1000 26.22 320 48

MAYURBHANJ 185 684 131 1000 37.43 496 24

BALASORE 595 349 55 1000 29.06 416 24

BHADRAK 308 232 460 1000 29.93 358 24

KENDRAPARA 640 55 305 1000 27.63 238 24

JAGATSINGHPUR 644 180 176 1000 18.86 209 48

CUTTACK 954 12 35 1000 35.35 1483 72

JAJPUR 1000 0 0 1000 34.55 153 24

DHENKANAL 832 0 168 1000 33.88 153 24

ANGUL 922 16 62 1000 52.31 258 48

NAYAGARH 794 69 137 1000 24.15 112 24

KHURDA 946 41 13 1000 23.39 2226 72

PURI 756 16 228 1000 18.64 380 24

GANJAM 977 23 0 1000 48.28 1140 48

GAJAPATI 828 132 40 1000 39.58 120 24

KANDHAMAL 836 164 0 1000 42.93 78 24

BOUDH 792 88 120 1000 42.21 22 24

SUBARNAPUR 595 309 96 1000 28.25 97 24

BALANGIR 320 646 34 1000 24.34 363 48

NUAPADA 700 300 0 1000 37.21 54 24

KALAHANDI 550 450 0 1000 33.39 235 24

RAYAGADA 910 90 0 1000 33.81 298 24

NABARANGPUR 682 176 141 1000 56.19 126 24

KORAPUT 925 30 45 1000 54.87 323 24

MALKANGIRI 1000 0 0 1000 33.3 95 24

ODISHA 797 147 56 1000 34.04 14192 1056


Annexure 34: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Urban Odisha, Pooled Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 834 80 86 1000 45.77 493 96

JHARSUGUDA 821 177 2 1000 31.02 833 96

SAMBALPUR 670 295 35 1000 37.36 785 96

DEOGARH 530 383 87 1000 31.1 63 48

SUNDARGARH 697 197 106 1000 52.57 1303 144

KEONJHAR 214 283 503 1000 33.59 445 96

MAYURBHANJ 412 490 98 1000 45.01 368 48

BALASORE 729 189 81 1000 52.71 781 48

BHADRAK 495 117 388 1000 31.76 355 48

KENDRAPARA 749 38 213 1000 29.31 170 48

JAGATSINGHPUR 738 99 163 1000 29.59 201 96

CUTTACK 716 267 17 1000 38.15 1648 144

JAJPUR 917 0 83 1000 37.59 195 48

DHENKANAL 944 2 54 1000 23.18 245 48

ANGUL 825 116 59 1000 73.04 350 96

NAYAGARH 815 95 90 1000 23.95 102 48

KHURDA 963 27 10 1000 49.74 2715 144

PURI 601 225 174 1000 68.72 513 48

GANJAM 989 11 0 1000 43.61 1220 96

GAJAPATI 735 126 138 1000 41.98 119 48

KANDHAMAL 918 75 7 1000 38.2 97 48

BOUDH 737 152 111 1000 47.92 37 48

SUBARNAPUR 498 452 50 1000 27.92 93 48

BALANGIR 284 504 212 1000 25.13 433 96

NUAPADA 809 178 13 1000 38.03 56 48

KALAHANDI 258 742 0 1000 42.69 267 48

RAYAGADA 758 172 69 1000 31.98 296 48

NABARANGPUR 423 397 180 1000 44.79 152 48

KORAPUT 946 9 45 1000 44.63 548 48

MALKANGIRI 959 24 16 1000 41.4 96 48

ODISHA 755 169 76 1000 43.57 14979 2112


Annexure 35: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Odisha, State Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 359 283 358 1000 37.31 4083 144

JHARSUGUDA 291 705 3 1000 37.98 1240 72

SAMBALPUR 267 698 35 1000 33.43 2328 96

DEOGARH 87 433 480 1000 31.74 737 48

SUNDARGARH 259 320 421 1000 54.3 3643 168

KEONJHAR 227 142 631 1000 41.28 3910 168

MAYURBHANJ 247 354 399 1000 51.55 5485 144

BALASORE 437 231 331 1000 45.4 5086 144

BHADRAK 284 103 613 1000 37.6 2931 120

KENDRAPARA 348 99 553 1000 33.38 2848 120

JAGATSINGHPUR 443 57 500 1000 29.15 2620 120

CUTTACK 545 322 132 1000 43.15 5301 192

JAJPUR 605 77 318 1000 29.39 3797 144

DHENKANAL 525 121 354 1000 33.36 2694 120

ANGUL 340 344 316 1000 66.6 3073 120

NAYAGARH 405 211 384 1000 26.76 2196 96

KHURDA 819 109 72 1000 66.36 5563 168

PURI 603 157 240 1000 53.22 3485 144

GANJAM 709 162 130 1000 41.15 6883 192

GAJAPATI 160 264 576 1000 43.34 1208 72

KANDHAMAL 289 359 351 1000 24.3 1865 72

BOUDH 164 136 700 1000 26.18 1102 72

SUBARNAPUR 202 420 378 1000 33.09 1354 72

BALANGIR 131 291 578 1000 27.1 4417 168

NUAPADA 134 502 364 1000 26.62 1221 72

KALAHANDI 91 869 40 1000 41.85 3310 144

RAYAGADA 219 232 549 1000 24.34 2222 96

NABARANGPUR 199 236 565 1000 31.33 2203 120

KORAPUT 315 157 528 1000 26.92 3480 120

MALKANGIRI 160 424 416 1000 35.38 1321 60

ODISHA 387 265 348 1000 40.52 91605 3588


Annexure 36: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Odisha, Central Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 340 485 176 1000 24.48 3742 144

JHARSUGUDA 626 355 19 1000 31.14 2017 72

SAMBALPUR 345 544 111 1000 35.76 2945 96

DEOGARH 85 728 187 1000 30.16 755 48

SUNDARGARH 446 554 0 1000 43.21 4636 168

KEONJHAR 176 628 196 1000 24.92 3992 168

MAYURBHANJ 116 485 399 1000 30.43 5754 144

BALASORE 267 345 388 1000 27.2 4701 144

BHADRAK 253 180 567 1000 33.46 3086 120

KENDRAPARA 344 72 584 1000 41.48 3032 120

JAGATSINGHPUR 594 98 308 1000 31.19 2425 120

CUTTACK 638 132 229 1000 59.58 5913 192

JAJPUR 438 109 454 1000 28.37 4115 144

DHENKANAL 462 150 388 1000 23.06 2852 120

ANGUL 589 71 340 1000 29.52 2723 120

NAYAGARH 429 92 479 1000 26.88 2182 96

KHURDA 744 91 166 1000 26.89 4379 168

PURI 505 92 403 1000 26.27 3116 144

GANJAM 770 67 163 1000 30.68 7418 192

GAJAPATI 574 222 204 1000 27.87 1362 72

KANDHAMAL 391 372 236 1000 29.9 1376 64

BOUDH 242 226 533 1000 23.39 1130 72

SUBARNAPUR 346 477 177 1000 24.71 1412 72

BALANGIR 159 722 119 1000 23.2 3886 168

NUAPADA 123 868 9 1000 27.93 1374 72

KALAHANDI 365 632 3 1000 25.09 4640 144

RAYAGADA 382 438 180 1000 30.91 2545 96

NABARANGPUR 147 519 334 1000 42.9 2542 120

KORAPUT 530 252 218 1000 28.72 3703 96

MALKANGIRI 86 748 167 1000 31.94 1109 48

ODISHA 417 330 254 1000 31.69 94864 3544


Annexure 37: Average floor area of the dwelling and per 1000 distribution of households by type of structure of the house in Odisha, Pooled Sample



no. of hhds.

pucca semi-pucca


estimated (00)

sample

BARGARH 348 379 272 1000 31.1 3892 288

JHARSUGUDA 497 490 13 1000 33.86 1601 144

SAMBALPUR 311 609 80 1000 34.84 2520 192

DEOGARH 86 582 332 1000 30.94 746 96

SUNDARGARH 348 462 190 1000 48.88 4021 336

KEONJHAR 200 388 412 1000 33.01 3943 336

MAYURBHANJ 180 421 399 1000 40.74 5619 288

BALASORE 356 286 358 1000 36.65 4893 288

BHADRAK 268 142 589 1000 35.48 3008 240

KENDRAPARA 346 85 569 1000 37.56 2940 240

JAGATSINGHPUR 518 74 408 1000 30.24 2499 240

CUTTACK 595 222 183 1000 51.91 5580 384

JAJPUR 518 94 388 1000 28.86 3956 288

DHENKANAL 492 136 371 1000 28.07 2773 240

ANGUL 458 216 327 1000 49.28 2882 240

NAYAGARH 417 152 431 1000 26.82 2189 192

KHURDA 787 100 114 1000 49.11 4917 336

PURI 556 126 317 1000 40.49 3301 288

GANJAM 740 113 147 1000 35.72 7151 384

GAJAPATI 379 242 379 1000 35.14 1285 144

KANDHAMAL 333 365 302 1000 26.67 1620 136

BOUDH 203 181 615 1000 24.77 1116 144

SUBARNAPUR 275 449 275 1000 28.81 1383 144

BALANGIR 142 492 365 1000 25.27 4109 336

NUAPADA 128 696 176 1000 27.32 1297 144

KALAHANDI 251 731 18 1000 32.07 3975 288

RAYAGADA 306 342 352 1000 27.85 2384 192

NABARANGPUR 171 387 441 1000 37.53 2373 240

KORAPUT 426 206 368 1000 27.85 3591 216

MALKANGIRI 126 572 302 1000 33.81 1215 108

ODISHA 401 298 301 1000 36.06 92780 7132


Annexure 38: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Rural Odisha, State Sample

Name of the District proportion(per1000)ofhhs with no dwelling

tenural status no. of dwelling unit

owned

hired

others

all(incl nr)

estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 942 18 40 1000 3366 96

JHARSUGUDA 0 1000 0 0 1000 746 24

SAMBALPUR 0 1000 0 0 1000 1584 48

DEOGARH 0 910 0 90 1000 675 24

SUNDARGARH 0 998 2 0 1000 2576 96

KEONJHAR 0 1000 0 0 1000 3324 120

MAYURBHANJ 0 993 0 7 1000 5245 120

BALASORE 0 974 11 15 1000 3940 120

BHADRAK 0 1000 0 0 1000 2579 96

KENDRAPARA 0 987 13 0 1000 2746 96

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 987 13 0 1000 2380 72

CUTTACK 0 1000 0 0 1000 3434 120

JAJPUR 0 999 1 0 1000 3560 120

DHENKANAL 0 984 8 8 1000 2358 96

ANGUL 0 978 0 22 1000 2601 72

NAYAGARH 0 1000 0 0 1000 2104 72

KHURDA 0 985 15 0 1000 2249 96

PURI 0 998 2 0 1000 2839 120

GANJAM 0 969 31 0 1000 5583 144

GAJAPATI 0 1000 0 0 1000 1091 48

KANDHAMAL 0 950 0 50 1000 1749 48

BOUDH 0 1000 0 0 1000 1050 48

SUBARNAPUR 0 822 0 178 1000 1264 48

BALANGIR 0 984 0 16 1000 3829 120

NUAPADA 0 997 3 0 1000 1162 48

KALAHANDI 0 1000 0 0 1000 3010 120

RAYAGADA 0 1000 0 0 1000 1928 72

NABARANGPUR 0 979 0 21 1000 2025 96

KORAPUT 0 909 91 0 1000 2708 96

MALKANGIRI 0 969 0 31 1000 1224 36

ODISHA 0 980 9 11 1000 74931 2532


Annexure 39: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Rural Odisha,Central Sample


proportion(per1000)ofhhs with no dwelling


owned hired others all(incl nr)

estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 968 30 3 1000 3432 96

JHARSUGUDA 0 872 0 128 1000 789 24

SAMBALPUR 0 685 130 185 1000 1886 48

DEOGARH 0 1000 0 0 1000 692 24

SUNDARGARH 0 971 25 4 1000 2859 96

KEONJHAR 0 906 94 0 1000 3672 120

MAYURBHANJ 0 944 34 22 1000 5257 120

BALASORE 0 973 16 11 1000 4284 120

BHADRAK 0 989 0 11 1000 2727 96

KENDRAPARA 0 1000 0 0 1000 2794 96

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 1000 0 0 1000 2216 72

CUTTACK 0 847 40 114 1000 4430 120

JAJPUR 0 997 1 2 1000 3962 120

DHENKANAL 0 902 0 98 1000 2699 96

ANGUL 0 877 114 9 1000 2465 72

NAYAGARH 0 957 36 6 1000 2069 72

KHURDA 0 987 13 0 1000 2154 96

PURI 0 980 20 0 1000 2736 120

GANJAM 0 952 48 0 1000 6278 144

GAJAPATI 0 710 139 151 1000 1243 48

KANDHAMAL 0 990 10 0 1000 1298 40

BOUDH 0 936 64 0 1000 1108 48

SUBARNAPUR 0 967 11 23 1000 1315 48

BALANGIR 0 997 0 3 1000 3523 120

NUAPADA 0 981 0 19 1000 1320 48

KALAHANDI 0 696 289 15 1000 4406 120

RAYAGADA 0 669 0 331 1000 2247 72

NABARANGPUR 0 1000 0 0 1000 2416 96

KORAPUT 0 762 238 0 1000 3380 72

MALKANGIRI 0 1000 0 0 1000 1014 24

ODISHA 0 916 53 31 1000 80672 2488


Annexure 40: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Rural Odisha,Pooled Sample





estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 955 24 21 1000 3399 192

JHARSUGUDA 0 934 0 66 1000 768 48

SAMBALPUR 0 829 71 100 1000 1735 96

DEOGARH 0 956 0 44 1000 683 48

SUNDARGARH 0 983 14 2 1000 2718 192

KEONJHAR 0 951 49 0 1000 3498 240

MAYURBHANJ 0 968 17 15 1000 5251 240

BALASORE 0 974 13 13 1000 4112 240

BHADRAK 0 995 0 5 1000 2653 192

KENDRAPARA 0 994 6 0 1000 2770 192

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 993 7 0 1000 2298 144

CUTTACK 0 914 22 64 1000 3932 240

JAJPUR 0 998 1 1 1000 3761 240

DHENKANAL 0 940 4 56 1000 2528 192

ANGUL 0 929 55 16 1000 2533 144

NAYAGARH 0 979 18 3 1000 2087 144

KHURDA 0 986 14 0 1000 2202 192

PURI 0 989 11 0 1000 2788 240

GANJAM 0 960 40 0 1000 5931 288

GAJAPATI 0 846 74 80 1000 1167 96

KANDHAMAL 0 967 4 29 1000 1524 88

BOUDH 0 967 33 0 1000 1079 96

SUBARNAPUR 0 896 5 99 1000 1289 96

BALANGIR 0 990 0 10 1000 3676 240

NUAPADA 0 988 2 10 1000 1241 96

KALAHANDI 0 819 172 9 1000 3708 240

RAYAGADA 0 822 0 178 1000 2088 144

NABARANGPUR 0 991 0 9 1000 2221 192

KORAPUT 0 827 173 0 1000 3044 168

MALKANGIRI 0 983 0 17 1000 1119 60

ODISHA 0 947 32 22 1000 77802 5020


Annexure 41: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Urban Odisha,State Sample





estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 519 419 61 1000 717 48

JHARSUGUDA 0 909 91 0 1000 493 48

SAMBALPUR 0 609 363 27 1000 743 48

DEOGARH 0 458 542 0 1000 62 24

SUNDARGARH 0 836 122 42 1000 1066 72

KEONJHAR 0 850 150 0 1000 586 48

MAYURBHANJ 0 708 292 0 1000 239 24

BALASORE 0 519 451 30 1000 1145 24

BHADRAK 0 491 509 0 1000 353 24

KENDRAPARA 0 905 95 0 1000 103 24

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 811 169 20 1000 240 48

CUTTACK 0 794 116 90 1000 1867 72

JAJPUR 0 633 367 0 1000 237 24

DHENKANAL 0 218 782 0 1000 336 24

ANGUL 0 639 231 130 1000 473 48

NAYAGARH 0 1000 0 0 1000 91 24

KHURDA 0 496 415 89 1000 3314 72

PURI 0 753 247 0 1000 646 24

GANJAM 0 659 311 30 1000 1300 48

GAJAPATI 0 561 0 439 1000 117 24

KANDHAMAL 0 191 809 0 1000 116 24

BOUDH 0 860 140 0 1000 51 24

SUBARNAPUR 0 1000 0 0 1000 90 24

BALANGIR 0 805 195 0 1000 588 48

NUAPADA 0 926 74 0 1000 59 24

KALAHANDI 0 975 25 0 1000 300 24

RAYAGADA 0 878 122 0 1000 294 24

NABARANGPUR 0 806 142 52 1000 178 24

KORAPUT 0 199 729 72 1000 772 24

MALKANGIRI 0 291 593 116 1000 97 24

ODISHA 0 637 312 50 1000 16674 1056


Annexure 42: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Urban Odisha, Central Sample


proportion(per1000)of hhs with no dwelling



estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 351 643 6 1000 310 48

JHARSUGUDA 0 187 808 4 1000 1228 48

SAMBALPUR 0 676 240 84 1000 1060 48

DEOGARH 0 569 431 0 1000 64 24

SUNDARGARH 0 539 460 1 1000 1777 72

KEONJHAR 0 863 50 86 1000 320 48

MAYURBHANJ 0 645 355 0 1000 496 24

BALASORE 0 619 381 0 1000 416 24

BHADRAK 0 627 353 20 1000 358 24

KENDRAPARA 0 500 500 0 1000 238 24

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 356 602 41 1000 209 48

CUTTACK 0 512 435 52 1000 1483 72

JAJPUR 0 268 653 79 1000 153 24

DHENKANAL 0 909 91 0 1000 153 24

ANGUL 0 106 836 59 1000 258 48

NAYAGARH 0 943 57 0 1000 112 24

KHURDA 0 93 878 29 1000 2226 72

PURI 0 425 98 477 1000 380 24

GANJAM 0 376 624 0 1000 1140 48

GAJAPATI 0 721 279 0 1000 120 24

KANDHAMAL 0 566 434 0 1000 78 24

BOUDH 0 615 385 0 1000 22 24

SUBARNAPUR 0 775 225 0 1000 97 24

BALANGIR 0 512 454 34 1000 363 48

NUAPADA 0 525 475 0 1000 54 24

KALAHANDI 0 533 467 0 1000 235 24

RAYAGADA 0 521 479 0 1000 298 24

NABARANGPUR 0 685 315 0 1000 126 24

KORAPUT 0 405 595 0 1000 323 24

MALKANGIRI 0 231 299 470 1000 95 24

ODISHA 0 433 528 39 1000 14192 1056


Annexure 43: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Urban Odisha, Pooled Sample





estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 471 494 34 1000 493 96

JHARSUGUDA 0 389 608 3 1000 833 96

SAMBALPUR 0 660 294 47 1000 785 96

DEOGARH 0 514 486 0 1000 63 48

SUNDARGARH 0 677 309 13 1000 1303 144

KEONJHAR 0 858 113 29 1000 445 96

MAYURBHANJ 0 666 334 0 1000 368 48

BALASORE 0 545 433 22 1000 781 48

BHADRAK 0 559 430 10 1000 355 48

KENDRAPARA 0 623 377 0 1000 170 48

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 587 379 33 1000 201 96

CUTTACK 0 671 259 71 1000 1648 144

JAJPUR 0 490 479 31 1000 195 48

DHENKANAL 0 434 566 0 1000 245 48

ANGUL 0 449 460 91 1000 350 96

NAYAGARH 0 969 31 0 1000 102 48

KHURDA 0 333 608 59 1000 2715 144

PURI 0 631 192 177 1000 513 48

GANJAM 0 527 457 16 1000 1220 96

GAJAPATI 0 642 141 217 1000 119 48

KANDHAMAL 0 342 658 0 1000 97 48

BOUDH 0 787 213 0 1000 37 48

SUBARNAPUR 0 883 117 0 1000 93 48

BALANGIR 0 693 298 10 1000 433 96

NUAPADA 0 734 266 0 1000 56 48

KALAHANDI 0 781 219 0 1000 267 48

RAYAGADA 0 699 301 0 1000 296 48

NABARANGPUR 0 756 213 31 1000 152 48

KORAPUT 0 260 689 51 1000 548 48

MALKANGIRI 0 261 447 291 1000 96 48

ODISHA 0 545 413 42 1000 14979 2112


Annexure 44: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Odisha, State Sample


proportion(per1000)of hhs with no dwelling



estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 868 88 44 1000 4083 144

JHARSUGUDA 0 964 36 0 1000 1240 72

SAMBALPUR 0 875 116 9 1000 2328 96

DEOGARH 0 872 46 82 1000 737 48

SUNDARGARH 0 950 37 12 1000 3643 168

KEONJHAR 0 978 22 0 1000 3910 168

MAYURBHANJ 0 980 13 7 1000 5485 144

BALASORE 0 871 110 19 1000 5086 144

BHADRAK 0 939 61 0 1000 2931 120

KENDRAPARA 0 984 16 0 1000 2848 120

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 971 27 2 1000 2620 120

CUTTACK 0 928 41 32 1000 5301 192

JAJPUR 0 976 24 0 1000 3797 144

DHENKANAL 0 888 105 7 1000 2694 120

ANGUL 0 926 35 39 1000 3073 120

NAYAGARH 0 1000 0 0 1000 2196 96

KHURDA 0 694 253 53 1000 5563 168

PURI 0 953 47 0 1000 3485 144

GANJAM 0 910 84 6 1000 6883 192

GAJAPATI 0 957 0 43 1000 1208 72

KANDHAMAL 0 903 50 47 1000 1865 72

BOUDH 0 993 7 0 1000 1102 72

SUBARNAPUR 0 834 0 166 1000 1354 72

BALANGIR 0 960 26 14 1000 4417 168

NUAPADA 0 993 7 0 1000 1221 72

KALAHANDI 0 998 2 0 1000 3310 144

RAYAGADA 0 984 16 0 1000 2222 96

NABARANGPUR 0 965 11 23 1000 2203 120

KORAPUT 0 752 232 16 1000 3480 120

MALKANGIRI 0 919 43 37 1000 1321 60

ODISHA 0 918 64 18 1000 91605 3588


Annexure 45: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Urban Odisha, Central Sample





estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 917 80 3 1000 3742 144

JHARSUGUDA 0 455 492 53 1000 2017 72

SAMBALPUR 0 682 170 149 1000 2945 96

DEOGARH 0 964 36 0 1000 755 48

SUNDARGARH 0 805 192 3 1000 4636 168

KEONJHAR 0 903 90 7 1000 3992 168

MAYURBHANJ 0 918 62 20 1000 5754 144

BALASORE 0 942 48 10 1000 4701 144

BHADRAK 0 947 41 12 1000 3086 120

KENDRAPARA 0 961 39 0 1000 3032 120

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 945 52 4 1000 2425 120

CUTTACK 0 763 139 98 1000 5913 192

JAJPUR 0 970 25 5 1000 4115 144

DHENKANAL 0 903 5 93 1000 2852 120

ANGUL 0 804 182 13 1000 2723 120

NAYAGARH 0 957 37 6 1000 2182 96

KHURDA 0 533 452 15 1000 4379 168

PURI 0 912 30 58 1000 3116 144

GANJAM 0 864 136 0 1000 7418 192

GAJAPATI 0 711 152 137 1000 1362 72

KANDHAMAL 0 966 34 0 1000 1376 64

BOUDH 0 929 71 0 1000 1130 72

SUBARNAPUR 0 953 25 21 1000 1412 72

BALANGIR 0 952 42 6 1000 3886 168

NUAPADA 0 963 19 18 1000 1374 72

KALAHANDI 0 688 298 14 1000 4640 144

RAYAGADA 0 651 56 293 1000 2545 96

NABARANGPUR 0 984 16 0 1000 2542 120

KORAPUT 0 731 269 0 1000 3703 96

MALKANGIRI 0 934 26 40 1000 1109 48

ODISHA 0 843 124 32 1000 94864 3544


Annexure 46: Per1000 distribution of dwelling units by tenurial status of the households in Odisha, Pooled Sample

Name of the District proportion(per1000)ofhhs with no dwelling



estimated(00)

sample

BARGARH 0 894 84 23 1000 3892 288

JHARSUGUDA 0 650 317 33 1000 1601 144

SAMBALPUR 0 776 140 84 1000 2520 192

DEOGARH 0 918 41 41 1000 746 96

SUNDARGARH 0 884 110 6 1000 4021 336

KEONJHAR 0 940 56 3 1000 3943 336

MAYURBHANJ 0 948 38 14 1000 5619 288

BALASORE 0 905 80 14 1000 4893 288

BHADRAK 0 943 51 6 1000 3008 240

KENDRAPARA 0 972 28 0 1000 2940 240

JAGATSINGHPUR 0 961 37 3 1000 2499 240

CUTTACK 0 842 92 66 1000 5580 384

JAJPUR 0 973 25 3 1000 3956 288

DHENKANAL 0 896 54 51 1000 2773 240

ANGUL 0 871 104 25 1000 2882 240

NAYAGARH 0 978 19 3 1000 2189 192

KHURDA 0 625 342 33 1000 4917 336

PURI 0 934 39 27 1000 3301 288

GANJAM 0 886 111 3 1000 7151 384

GAJAPATI 0 827 80 93 1000 1285 144

KANDHAMAL 0 929 43 27 1000 1620 136

BOUDH 0 961 39 0 1000 1116 144

SUBARNAPUR 0 895 13 92 1000 1383 144

BALANGIR 0 959 31 10 1000 4109 336

NUAPADA 0 977 13 10 1000 1297 144

KALAHANDI 0 817 175 8 1000 3975 288

RAYAGADA 0 806 37 156 1000 2384 192

NABARANGPUR 0 976 14 11 1000 2373 240

KORAPUT 0 741 251 8 1000 3591 216

MALKANGIRI 0 926 35 39 1000 1215 108

ODISHA 0 882 93 25 1000 92780 7132


Annexure 47 : District wise relative standard error on having attached bathroom facility for

state, central and pooled samples


Centre State Poole

d

Centr

e

State Poole

d

Centr

e

State Pooled

Bargarh 0 48.43 48.43 27.91 15.48 15.99 11.48 20.01 15.73

Jharsuguda 0 76.21 82.56 46.39 41.94 29.95 42.9 57.21 32.10

Sambalpur 97.61 79.22 79.99 72.32 9.06 33.48 61.57 28.91 38.04

Deogarh 0 0 0.00 46.34 84.59 57.16 17.64 72.92 48.97

Sundargarh 98.66 101.76 73.02 9.13 10.55 6.08 15.57 20.21 11.81

Keonjhar 0 0 0.00 66.84 99.09 86.22 91.02 99.92 80.62

Mayurbhanj 100.06 28.06 28.26 158.92 15.59 36.33 88.45 15.03 19.76

Balasore 96.33 55.46 54.32 55.93 61.82 40.13 76.61 67.35 54.00

Bhadrak 100.35 82.01 66.43 29.02 63.16 56.03 73.02 47.87 42.49

Kendrapara 69.4 25.23 24.29 91.42 18.6 43.45 61.9 23.26 22.34

Jagatsinghpur 83.09 0 86.11 9.13 25.08 13.70 66.05 91.23 55.67

Cuttack 31.46 101.18 29.73 58.11 95.12 55.83 46.44 72.71 38.65

Jajpur 98.59 70.72 61.11 8.08 8.35 6.71 27.09 42.75 27.64

Dhenkanal 99.33 59.85 59.80 105.48 50.69 37.63 57.4 50.23 46.81

Angul 96.6 98.53 77.40 7.16 25.92 10.87 52.99 29.55 35.49

Nayagarh 30.39 102.74 29.34 15.92 97.98 27.35 27.89 76.14 26.50

Khurda 63.23 0 63.23 42.88 51.29 33.19 43.9 51.53 34.26

Puri 70.95 85.84 76.10 95.48 45.62 35.19 57.73 46.93 41.70

Ganjam 98.46 0 86.15 10.46 0.8 5.19 11.87 41.45 23.26

Gajapati 41.64 100.12 36.71 2.74 69.22 38.48 20.64 53.84 24.16

Kandhamal 95.16 0 115.55 2.54 19.36 12.27 44.17 89.34 52.16

Boudh 93.56 98.36 66.70 22.25 131.8 38.62 74.99 87.86 57.04

Subarnapur 99.37 0 99.37 53.83 21.67 29.42 52.34 26.66 33.80

Balangir 0 102.1 51.05 12.5 115.4 34.94 11.64 72.1 29.14

Nuapada 105.31 99.31 88.82 48.93 7.76 20.51 74.01 17.45 43.75

Kalahandi 84.17 99.47 70.36 25.34 8.28 9.92 56.6 14.37 27.17

Rayagada 57.6 100.51 51.23 17.21 54.1 20.83 28.87 65.83 25.79

Nabarangpur 67.97 0 67.97 54.96 122.5 56.27 56.09 102.3 46.12

Koraput 12.38 99.74 66.62 7.46 23.19 10.04 11.3 14.37 8.89

Malkangiri 0 0 0.00 82.08 10.57 30.36 57.15 20.87 25.46

Odisha 21.04 19.19 13.97 11.87 15.56 9.53 11.31 13.29 8.85


Annexure 48 : Relative Standard Error( RSE) in % on nature of access to the principal

source of drinking water in Rural Odisha (State Sample)


District code Exclusive use

of the

households

Common use

of households

in the building

Neighbour's

source

Community

use

Others

Baragarh 0 0 0 0 0

Jharsuguda 112.12 0 0 1.21 0

Sambalpur 0 82.59 0 0.37 0

Deogarh 103.46 0 0 2.9 0

Sundargarh 13.31 0 0 1.37 0

Keonjhar 25.81 50.43 68.15 15.95 0

Mayurbhanja 20.66 32.85 58.97 9.99 0

Balasore 22.9 98.19 63.43 19.93 0

Bhadrak 36.34 99.44 27.99 10.66 0

Kendrapara 20.49 0 0 6.18 0

Jagatsinghpur 20.73 102.47 57.83 29.16 0

Cuttack 39.27 44.06 62.95 17.46 0

Jajpur 43.82 27.22 36.13 29.47 0

Dhenkanal 35.8 53.53 79.18 11.38 0

Angul 53.45 74.51 98.53 12.68 0

Nayagarh 0 0 0 0 0

Khurda 26.21 37.77 69.22 31.45 0

Puri 26.31 55.62 102.21 11.12 0

Ganjam 38.9 0 0 2.98 100.32

Gajapati 100.12 0 0 5.28 0

Kandhamal 0 0 0 0 0

Boudh 75.12 74.05 0 4.06 0

Sonepur 73.63 0 102.36 1.72 0

Bolangir 0 0 0 0 0

Nuapada 99.31 0 0 34.47 0

Kalahandi 86.81 0 0 0.37 0

Rayagada 99.51 0 0 1.42 2.72

Nawrangapur 98.69 90.57 0 1.97 0

Koraput 56.31 99.74 0 17.87 94.17

Malkangiri 0 0 0 0 0

Odisha 8.59 15.28 18.83 2.08 35.56


Annexure 49: Relative Standard Error( RSE )in % on nature of access to the

principal source of drinking water in Rural Odisha (Central Sample)


District

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se o

f

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

u

se

Oth

ers

Est

imat

ed (

00

)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Bargarh 78.62 104.07 65.3 8.67 0 12 96

Jharsuguda 0 0 0 0 0 2.45 24

Sambalpur 82.95 0 0 14.84 101.72 2.94 48

Deogarh 0 0 0 0 0 2.02 24

Sundargarh 68.72 64.34 101.95 4.86 0 3.64 96

Keonjhar 95.14 99.65 29.46 4.7 0 5.64 120

Mayurbhanj 59.9 23.71 16.57 10.64 71.2 3.49 120

Balasore 38.99 32.83 37.28 14.89 0 5.82 120

Bhadrak 52.13 13.75 67.03 34.08 0 2.78 96

Kendrapara 84.06 0 0 5.75 0 7.71 96

Jagatsinghpur 25.88 34.97 48.55 38.76 0 5.79 72

Cuttack 31.52 59.53 42.88 9.87 0 4.63 120

Jajpur 28.62 43.65 37.09 14.33 76.1 3.97 120

Dhenkanal 89.6 89.76 56.44 19.32 0 10.84 96

Angul 54.22 102.03 0 12.9 0 7.51 72

Nayagarh 100.74 88.74 101.27 4.12 93.37 6.74 72

Khurda 19.14 36.76 27.42 32.99 0 1.54 96

Puri 40.69 47.77 39.55 27.1 0 4.03 120

Ganjam 65.28 85.08 72.51 6.83 0 4.23 144

Gajapati 0 0 0 18.21 101.91 16.98 48

Kandhamal 83.59 0 78.71 72.21 88.7 12.74 40

Boudh 58.66 93.56 93.56 15.53 0 6.81 48

Subarnapur 84.77 81.75 95.46 19.43 0 1.16 48

Balangir 97.78 96.46 0 1.01 20.94 5.7 120

Nuapada 105.31 105.31 0 6.25 0 5.41 48

Kalahandi 65.86 58.09 0 39.51 76.39 23.65 120

Rayagada 0 83.28 0 19.27 0 17.51 72

Nabarangpur 0 0 0 0 0 6.24 96

Koraput 0 39.37 87.68 12.87 0 12.38 72

Malkangiri 0 0 0 0 0 0 24

Odisha 11.57 18.02 14.12 3.04 39.14 1.86 2488


Annexure 50: Relative Standard Error( RSE) in % on nature of access to the principal source of

drinking water in Urban Odisha (State Sample)


District Exclusive use of

the households

Common use of

households in

the building

Neighbour's

source

Community

use

Others

Baragarh 45.17 41.46 68.53 25.35 107.78

Jharsuguda 36.61 62.97 0 25.22 0

Sambalpur 59.85 61.94 79.3 31.86 0

Deogarh 87.18 48.08 0 16.56 0

Sundargarh 17.74 88.49 0 6.12 113.34

Keonjhar 69.06 92.07 55.9 15.2 106.6

Mayurbhanja 21.26 47.82 0 20.23 0

Balasore 6.77 60.29 0 76.42 0

Bhadrak 110.76 110.76 0 26.75 0

Kendrapara 7.1 12.13 0 29.1 0

Jagatsinghpur 15.76 23.57 27.01 30.77 129.37

Cuttack 59.3 102.74 97.28 8.47 0

Jajpur 19.16 30.97 21.37 101.24 0

Dhenkanal 136.32 62.91 0 136.32 0

Angul 58.79 131.79 68.23 3.94 0

Nayagarh 0 0 0 0 0

Khurda 22.59 77.55 100.52 13.31 0

Puri 14.84 95.27 104.73 49.11 0

Ganjam 11.81 7.38 0 17.06 0

Gajapati 0 112.24 0 87.76 0

Kandhamal 8.93 26.07 0 27.45 0

Boudh 18.73 43.09 131.83 5.66 0

Sonepur 95.42 0 95.42 11.67 0

Bolangir 104.06 104.06 0 1.36 0

Nuapada 8.5 0 0 109.6 0

Kalahandi 4.94 124.09 0 8.08 0

Rayagada 14.31 0 119.83 7.32 0

Nawrangapur 118.32 0 122.48 48.23 0

Koraput 14.96 60.99 60.99 60.99 0

Malkangiri 42.99 66.17 66.17 1.96 0

Odisha 9.24 23.68 41.82 6.92 91.43


Annexure 51 : Relative Standard Error( RSE )in % on nature of access to the principal source of

drinking water in Urban Odisha (central sample)


District E

xcl

usi

ve

use

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

ho

use

ho

lds

in

the

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

u

se

Oth

ers

Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Bargarh 95.98 42.92 99.36 38.4 0 27.48 48

Jharsuguda 4.47 9.65 100.73 55.2 91.04 8.97 48

Sambalpur 78.1 75.43 0 60.87 0 17.99 48

Deogarh 77.39 31.45 0 10.45 0 31.45 24

Sundargarh 21.11 14.83 97.12 42.41 0 3.55 72

Keonjhar 66.67 59.39 0 28.03 0 26.12 48

Mayurbhanj 19.91 168.67 31.33 31.33 0 68.67 24

Balasore 85.66 79.56 79.56 1.82 0 20.44 24

Bhadrak 37.65 4.88 4.31 11.89 0 70.98 24

Kendrapara 47.98 60.66 92.02 79.95 107.98 7.98 24

Jagatsinghpur 49.14 34.18 121.48 94.27 0 23.01 48

Cuttack 43.57 116.75 100.32 79.51 0 18.61 72

Jajpur 25.3 18.51 0 96.77 0 3.23 24

Dhenkanal 14.93 99.86 0 47.06 0 41.04 24

Angul 7.8 92.31 0 28.62 0 8.44 48

Nayagarh 43.55 133.55 0 6.63 0 33.55 24

Khurda 24.52 17.41 114.91 39.91 101.42 14.91 72

Puri 95.48 6.86 0 0 0 4.52 24

Ganjam 37.48 1.47 22.93 40.58 0 25.52 48

Gajapati 9.16 128.93 71.07 14.43 0 28.93 24

Kandhamal 12.53 24.32 45.24 10.5 0 13.64 24

Boudh 11.11 0 0 7.95 0 27.63 24

Subarnapur 91.57 2.68 0 2.83 0 8.43 24

Balangir 14.04 77.77 63.29 21.99 21.52 9.59 48

Nuapada 37.65 71.62 0 52.93 0 28.38 24

Kalahandi 2.65 53.76 22.5 61.73 0 21.52 24

Rayagada 20.33 74.29 0 125.71 0 25.71 24

Nabarangpur 37.27 0 0 37.96 0 18.89 24

Koraput 12.89 0 0 18.76 0 8.47 24

Malkangiri 52.27 72.73 0 127.27 0 27.27 24

Odisha 14.18 10.3 30.16 11.16 57.62 5.22 1056


Annexure 52: Relative Standard Error ( RSE) in % on nature of access to the principal source of

drinking water in Rural + Urban Odisha (state sample)


District

Ex

clu

siv

e u

se

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

hou

seh

old

s

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

Est

imat

ed

(00

)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Bargarh 71.35 15.75 94.51 5.2 100.73 6.31 144

Jharsuguda 49.28 80.05 0 10.63 0 13.72 72

Sambalpur 48.68 73.54 94.93 10.33 0 20.88 96

Deogarh 97.17 36.48 0 2.89 0 3.35 48

Sundargarh 10.34 96.74 0 1.93 104.05 9.3 168

Keonjhar 25.14 46.06 61.24 14.01 101.07 4.19 168

Mayurbhanj 17.69 29.71 59.05 9.93 0 4.48 144

Balasore 19.93 74.41 63.19 22.13 0 7.22 144

Bhadrak 34.73 75.14 28.14 9.97 0 1.85 120

Kendrapara 18.56 32.56 0 6.09 0 18.95 120

Jagatsinghpur 18.98 66.51 57.21 28.16 101.56 14.15 120

Cuttack 33.56 42.64 52.73 10.77 0 3.32 192

Jajpur 35.77 26.05 34.33 28.9 0 6.19 144

Dhenkanal 35.5 47.41 79.78 13.4 0 5.96 120

Angul 43.82 64.65 73.74 12.24 0 6.48 120

Nayagarh 0 0 0 0 0 5.83 96

Khurda 17.98 46.63 63.86 18.5 0 1.58 168

Puri 15.11 48.35 96.79 11.66 0 3.7 144

Ganjam 33.6 33.28 0 7.79 100.7 9.55 192

Gajapati 100.11 101.21 0 6.9 0 2.36 72

Kandhamal 61.35 96.01 0 3.63 0 11.64 72

Boudh 43.29 60.85 101.5 4.12 0 2.23 72

Subarnapur 59.78 0 98.38 1.8 0 6.16 72

Balangir 99.74 99.74 0 0.17 0 8.82 168

Nuapada 83.98 0 0 34.28 0 2.9 72

Kalahandi 19.35 102.32 0 0.42 0 5.73 144

Rayagada 3.85 0 102.64 1.83 3.91 3.02 96

Nabarangpur 78.38 91.34 102.27 2.97 0 9.78 120

Koraput 14.06 87.14 91.39 17.2 95.26 9.06 120

Malkangiri 11.81 97.54 97.54 1.88 0 3.18 60

Odisha 6.59 13.53 17.17 2.12 33.75 1.59 3588


Annexure 53: Relative Standard Error ( RSE ) in % on nature of access to the principal

source of drinking water in Rural + Urban Odisha


District E

xcl

usi

ve

use

of

the

ho

use

ho

lds

Co

mm

on

use

of

hou

seh

old

s

in t

he

bu

ild

ing

Nei

gh

bo

ur'

s

sou

rce

Co

mm

un

ity

use

Oth

ers

Est

imat

ed(0

0)

ho

use

ho

lds

Sam

ple

ho

use

ho

lds

Bargarh 55.62 64.04 62.72 9.38 0 11.24 144

Jharsuguda 3.58 6.24 100.35 5.24 94.55 5.54 72

Sambalpur 62.02 63.96 0 19.33 101.3 6.74 96

Deogarh 48.63 3.23 0 0.27 0 3.23 48

Sundargarh 23.36 13.74 71.4 6.89 0 2.63 168

Keonjhar 72.12 73.34 29.38 5.01 0 5.59 168

Mayurbhanj 43.99 26.5 17.48 10.45 71.39 6.73 144

Balasore 37.07 30.65 35.85 13.47 0 5.6 144

Bhadrak 48.39 12.17 53.5 31.59 0 8.6 120

Kendrapara 77.8 53.79 99.63 5.93 100.88 7.13 120

Jagatsinghpur 24.35 29.53 46.52 37.77 0 5.65 120

Cuttack 33.61 71.09 40.49 11.21 0 5.82 192

Jajpur 25.83 36.18 37.12 14.3 76.02 3.83 144

Dhenkanal 65.11 80.5 56.72 18.49 0 10.49 120

Angul 36.62 97.85 0 12.26 0 6.84 120

Nayagarh 70.9 83.34 101.21 3.94 93.73 6.62 96

Khurda 14.98 13.01 28.4 27.17 100.45 7.62 168

Puri 38.91 26.79 39.45 27.04 0 3.58 144

Ganjam 43.19 19.57 18.06 6.49 0 5.31 192

Gajapati 23.17 103.71 98.68 17.98 101.66 15.7 72

Kandhamal 76.97 16.6 72.38 68.64 89.34 12.04 64

Boudh 55.89 93.69 93.69 15.28 0 6.7 72

Subarnapur 81.27 77.32 95.53 17.96 0 1.23 72

Balangir 22.35 55.38 70.22 1.16 20.14 5.24 168

Nuapada 79.52 82.03 0 6.43 0 5.32 72

Kalahandi 54.07 55.6 48.45 38 77.59 22.48 144

Rayagada 15.64 67.61 0 17.98 0 15.75 96

Nabarangpur 55.55 0 0 1.42 0 6.01 120

Koraput 23.52 40.45 88.75 11.84 0 11.33 96

Malkangiri 27.34 97.66 0 3.14 0 2.34 48

Odisha 9.37 10.55 12.94 2.9 38.95 1.76 3544


Annexure 54: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on facility of bathroom in rural Odisha

(State Sample)

District

Facility of bathroom


Bargarh 48.43 73.81 4.17

Jharsuguda 76.21 87.88 0.23

Sambalpur 79.22 43.56 1.18

Deogarh 0 0.00 0.00

Sundargarh 101.76 23.13 1.79

Keonjhar 0 67.21 2.22

Mayurbhanj 28.06 33.03 1.07

Balasore 55.46 0.00 1.90

Bhadrak 82.01 28.31 3.17

Kendrapara 25.23 50.59 10.30

Jagatsinghpur 0 9.62 0.75

Cuttack 101.18 17.61 13.31

Jajpur 70.72 47.63 4.86

Dhenkanal 59.85 81.97 11.63

Angul 98.53 62.20 6.41

Nayagarh 102.74 102.74 4.73

Khurda 0 15.74 23.32

Puri 85.84 59.35 10.97

Ganjam 0 61.42 4.81

Gajapati 100.12 100.12 5.95

Kandhamal 0 0.00 0.00

Boudh 98.36 0.00 2.77

Subarnapur 0 0.00 0.00

Balangir 102.1 26.30 1.39

Nuapada 99.31 100.77 0.21

Kalahandi 99.47 33.16 2.02

Rayagada 100.51 90.97 6.17

Nabarangpur 0 72.87 0.78

Koraput 99.74 32.83 3.70

Malkangiri 0 0.00 0.00

Odisha 19.19 9.59 1.09


Annexure 55: Relative Standard Error (RSE ) in % on facility of bathroom in rural Odisha

(Central Sample)

District



Bargarh 0 66.08 3.87

Jharsuguda 0 0.00 0.00

Sambalpur 97.61 0.00 14.59

Deogarh 0 0.00 0.00

Sundargarh 98.66 101.95 8.32

Keonjhar 0 65.86 1.84

Mayurbhanj 100.06 37.52 2.66

Balasore 96.33 33.62 2.47

Bhadrak 100.35 66.22 4.39

Kendrapara 69.4 65.72 1.85

Jagatsinghpur 83.09 66.95 15.56

Cuttack 31.46 61.09 10.81

Jajpur 98.59 31.77 5.33

Dhenkanal 99.33 89.76 9.75

Angul 96.6 93.76 13.37

Nayagarh 30.39 27.04 4.45

Khurda 63.23 42.41 10.05

Puri 70.95 47.42 2.23

Ganjam 98.46 61.31 7.08

Gajapati 41.64 80.71 5.70

Kandhamal 95.16 106.16 0.69

Boudh 93.56 106.49 1.24

Subarnapur 99.37 81.08 4.19

Balangir 0 97.78 0.27

Nuapada 105.31 75.25 6.95

Kalahandi 84.17 33.71 24.39

Rayagada 57.6 83.28 20.78

Nabarangpur 67.97 0.00 0.66

Koraput 12.38 40.63 12.70

Malkangiri 0 0.00 0.00

Odisha 21.04 17.83 1.96


Annexure 56: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on facility of bathroom in urban

Odisha (State Sample)

District code Facility of bathroom


Bargarh 15.48 68.53 10.68

Jharsuguda 41.94 0.00 32.39

Sambalpur 9.06 49.81 19.30

Deogarh 84.59 32.82 20.61

Sundargarh 10.55 21.47 14.52

Keonjhar 99.09 82.51 33.18

Mayurbhanj 15.59 73.75 20.69

Balasore 61.82 128.51 48.17

Bhadrak 63.16 20.37 22.31

Kendrapara 18.6 25.11 0.00


Cuttack 95.12 15.63 3.57

Jajpur 8.35 54.32 42.06

Dhenkanal 50.69 136.32 136.32

Angul 25.92 68.23 9.23

Nayagarh 97.98 65.25 11.12

Khurda 51.29 81.27 28.52

Puri 45.62 95.27 96.54

Ganjam 0.8 1.48 2.61

Gajapati 69.22 87.76 87.76

Kandhamal 19.36 173.93 11.95

Boudh 131.83 33.23 23.95

Subarnapur 21.67 82.24 7.44

Balangir 115.42 49.39 29.84

Nuapada 7.76 0.00 22.44

Kalahandi 8.28 4.07 2.44

Rayagada 54.1 30.23 90.73

Nabarangpur 122.48 21.33 14.49

Koraput 23.19 4.95 60.99

Malkangiri 10.57 133.83 51.54

Odisha 15.56 17.79 8.31


Annexure 57: Relative Standard Error (RSE ) in % on facility of bathroom in

urban Odisha (Central Sample)

District

facility of bathroom


Bargarh 27.91 66.59 34.73

Jharsuguda 46.39 89.93 26.82

Sambalpur 72.32 54.17 53.94

Deogarh 46.34 0.00 3.70

Sundargarh 9.13 56.86 50.28

Keonjhar 66.84 54.38 27.95

Mayurbhanj 158.92 17.50 31.33

Balasore 55.93 79.56 55.24

Bhadrak 29.02 29.02 10.45

Kendrapara 91.42 75.64 70.57


Cuttack 58.11 13.28 93.00

Jajpur 8.08 103.23 0.00

Dhenkanal 105.48 11.63 47.06

Angul 7.16 92.31 19.99

Nayagarh 15.92 26.11 9.34

Khurda 42.88 31.37 14.55

Puri 95.48 70.46 95.48

Ganjam 10.46 12.43 63.89

Gajapati 2.74 2.70 4.79

Kandhamal 2.54 6.36 7.75

Boudh 22.25 127.63 0.79

Subarnapur 53.83 20.14 13.61

Balangir 12.5 31.49 12.79

Nuapada 48.93 128.38 41.02

Kalahandi 25.34 31.08 80.32

Rayagada 17.21 125.71 125.71

Nabarangpur 54.96 0.00 61.68

Koraput 7.46 0.00 91.53

Malkangiri 82.08 72.73 127.27

Odisha 11.87 12.36 13.31


Annexure 58: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on facility of bathroom in rural + urban

Odisha (State Sample)

District code facility of bathroom


Bargarh 20.01 57.37 5.28

Jharsuguda 57.21 93.43 12.58

Sambalpur 28.91 44.68 7.60

Deogarh 72.92 21.32 1.08

Sundargarh 20.21 18.39 4.14

Keonjhar 99.92 60.35 4.53

Mayurbhanj 15.03 31.06 1.24

Balasore 67.35 106.47 8.99

Bhadrak 47.87 22.36 3.16

Kendrapara 23.26 35.10 10.10


Cuttack 72.71 12.87 8.79

Jajpur 42.75 41.24 4.67

Dhenkanal 50.23 77.71 14.05

Angul 29.55 50.58 6.18

Nayagarh 76.14 98.58 4.57

Khurda 51.53 30.65 18.41

Puri 46.93 54.21 13.16

Ganjam 41.45 41.71 8.00

Gajapati 53.84 89.26 6.44

Kandhamal 89.34 105.13 3.37

Boudh 87.86 63.60 2.99

Subarnapur 26.66 78.21 0.31

Balangir 72.1 17.25 2.00

Nuapada 17.45 100.73 0.68

Kalahandi 14.37 20.76 2.37

Rayagada 65.83 58.22 8.56

Nabarangpur 102.27 36.94 0.91

Koraput 14.37 25.32 8.14

Malkangiri 20.87 102.50 1.22

Odisha 13.29 9.15 1.43


Annexure 59: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on facility of bathroom in rural +

urban Odisha (Central Sample)

District



Bargarh 11.48 54.87 4.53

Jharsuguda 42.9 93.44 2.28

Sambalpur 61.57 42.76 17.35

Deogarh 17.64 0.00 0.11

Sundargarh 15.57 49.78 10.99

Keonjhar 91.02 51.73 2.86

Mayurbhanj 88.45 38.74 3.93

Balasore 76.61 45.14 4.27

Bhadrak 73.02 50.70 4.76

Kendrapara 61.9 54.44 2.41


Cuttack 46.44 29.22 14.49

Jajpur 27.09 31.20 5.31

Dhenkanal 57.4 75.75 9.24

Angul 52.99 82.13 12.74

Nayagarh 27.89 21.30 4.37

Khurda 43.9 22.35 10.12

Puri 57.73 48.81 5.35

Ganjam 11.87 40.70 7.07

Gajapati 20.64 48.78 4.81

Kandhamal 44.17 57.40 1.26

Boudh 74.99 99.78 1.20

Subarnapur 52.34 71.60 4.06

Balangir 11.64 36.68 1.08

Nuapada 74.01 71.03 7.07

Kalahandi 56.6 30.71 23.33

Rayagada 28.87 77.00 19.08

Nabarangpur 56.09 0.00 2.05

Koraput 11.3 41.71 11.62

Malkangiri 57.15 97.66 2.46

Odisha 11.31 11.64 1.97


Annexure 60: District wise relative standard error (RSE) in % on bathroom facility for pooled

samples

District

Having attached bathroom Having no bathroom

Rural Urban Rural +

Urban

Rural Urban Rural +

Urban

Bargarh 48.43 15.99 15.73 3.71 12.68 3.70

Jharsuguda 82.56 29.95 32.10 5.45 5.06 3.31

Sambalpur 79.99 33.48 38.04 6.71 14.13 6.33

Deogarh 0.00 57.16 48.97 5.45 6.39 5.31

Sundargarh 73.02 6.08 11.81 3.36 8.66 3.68

Keonjhar 0.00 86.22 80.62 5.08 9.52 4.70

Mayurbhanj 28.26 36.33 19.76 4.27 13.10 4.37

Balasore 54.32 40.13 54.00 4.19 6.24 3.43

Bhadrak 66.43 56.03 42.49 3.24 6.33 3.14

Kendrapara 24.29 43.45 22.34 2.27 2.50 2.17

Jagatsinghpur 86.11 13.70 55.67 3.30 15.71 3.23

Cuttack 29.73 55.83 38.65 3.92 11.94 6.39

Jajpur 61.11 6.71 27.64 3.52 6.34 3.29

Dhenkanal 59.80 37.63 46.81 4.60 5.25 4.25

Angul 77.40 10.87 35.49 6.83 4.63 5.51

Nayagarh 29.34 27.35 26.50 4.61 10.95 4.30

Khurda 63.23 33.19 34.26 3.89 9.28 7.08

Puri 76.10 35.19 41.70 3.69 7.48 2.97

Ganjam 86.15 5.19 23.26 3.23 8.44 2.99

Gajapati 36.71 38.48 24.16 6.53 4.83 5.81

Kandhamal 115.55 12.27 52.16 11.10 8.58 10.16

Boudh 66.70 38.62 57.04 2.00 12.22 2.06

Subarnapur 99.37 29.42 33.80 3.72 3.61 3.60

Balangir 51.05 34.94 29.14 2.91 3.07 2.54

Nuapada 88.82 20.51 43.75 5.61 6.97 5.40

Kalahandi 70.36 9.92 27.17 4.41 14.32 4.27

Rayagada 51.23 20.83 25.79 2.70 16.52 3.00

Nabarangpur 67.97 56.27 46.12 6.49 2.14 5.97

Koraput 66.62 10.04 8.89 8.39 18.85 8.15

Malkangiri 0.00 30.36 25.46 8.33 7.00 7.82

Odisha 13.97 9.53 8.85 0.88 3.58 1.12


Annexure 61 : District wise relative standard error on exclusive use of latrine for state, central and

pooled samples



Bargarh 59.82 21.78 22.96 2.6 6.37 3.27 35.17 14.3 14.97

Jharsuguda 0 10.18 10.18 3.62 34.6 17.35 2.25 46.54 18.94

Sambalpur 72.89 21.02 52.60 51.04 20.25 25.17 45.89 18.11 26.93

Deogarh 0 96.54 97.78 87.15 16.66 36.59 58.38 73.2 63.97

Sundargarh 88.45 8.85 29.43 6.31 15.32 6.22 16.81 6.35 9.63

Keonjhar 72.46 50.36 46.21 66.23 46.19 35.42 61.87 36.67 35.22

Mayurbhanj 49.73 26.79 24.08 38.01 6.17 15.77 35.28 23.02 19.51

Balasore 27.79 14.32 13.43 56.16 8.78 31.79 25.79 11.18 11.43

Bhadrak 62.56 28.05 26.24 19.12 57.11 34.06 46.58 24.7 22.26

Kendrapara 45.45 22.9 22.77 55.56 22.04 27.10 40.82 21.1 20.73

Jagatsinghpur 46.42 48.43 34.20 70.9 15.83 19.08 43.22 37.84 29.20

Cuttack 29.83 22.46 18.57 26.86 19.35 16.98 22.85 14.49 13.33

Jajpur 33.24 14.83 18.36 1.07 29.36 14.05 27.76 14.34 15.53

Dhenkanal 39.03 42.19 34.63 21.5 136.3 41.74 30.34 41.13 30.69

Angul 47.81 19.12 19.42 1.08 35.24 15.70 31.93 17.58 15.60

Nayagarh 21.9 54.14 25.43 3.17 11.03 6.05 19.3 44.68 21.64

Khurda 48.92 11.72 15.45 18.77 25.83 16.88 21.57 18.25 13.61

Puri 38.77 48.54 38.28 95.48 31.23 26.03 37.16 31.74 25.65

Ganjam 35.48 34.98 24.96 18.28 4.87 9.89 25.83 24.75 17.92

Gajapati 21.69 88.42 25.96 2.73 87.76 22.03 16.62 72.89 21.08

Kandhamal 13.05 103.07 21.09 10.74 1.64 6.71 16.64 59.83 23.98

Boudh 18.61 0 18.01 12.27 18.98 11.34 15.77 49.35 19.42

Subarnapur 99.37 106.24 92.16 91.57 12.46 47.68 80.61 72.15 55.20

Balangir 58.41 22.74 36.42 19.94 39.83 21.25 41.05 15.96 24.84

Nuapada 105.31 74.12 61.76 11.3 12.03 8.61 74.95 51.06 43.49

Kalahandi 44.11 49.41 32.86 38.11 8.72 19.25 38.73 18.55 24.59

Rayagada 79.07 99.49 61.22 39.82 44.94 30.07 29.62 53.26 29.85

Nabarangpur 65.73 0 57.51 57.85 19.39 26.47 54.83 41.19 33.37

Koraput 12.38 24.12 25.00 7.46 8.15 5.57 11.3 15.56 12.28

Malkangiri 0 0 0 64.42 19.1 29.39 39.48 12.41 19.33

Odisha 10.6 7.07 6.10 7.38 7.45 5.17 7.4 5.47 4.48


Annexure 62: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in rural Odisha ,

State Sample

Access to latrine

District Exclusive use of the

household

Common use of

households in

building

Others No Latrine

Baragarh 21.78 0 0 5.21

Jharsuguda 10.18 0 0 0.23

Sambalpur 21.02 0 0 1.07

Deogarh 96.54 0 0 18.1

Sundargarh 8.85 0 0 1.49

Keonjhar 50.36 0 100.71 3.81

Mayurbhanja 26.79 102.08 0 7.52

Balasore 14.32 96.83 0 8.6

Bhadrak 28.05 0 0 5.4

Kendrapara 22.9 100.46 0 10.5

Jagatsinghpur 48.43 0 0 9.66

Cuttack 22.46 21.75 0 8.1

Jajpur 14.83 36.15 0 3.99

Dhenkanal 42.19 44.58 0 14.47

Angul 19.12 0 0 17.74

Nayagarh 54.14 0 0 6.16

Khurda 11.72 52.6 0 20.98

Puri 48.54 80.82 0 17.35

Ganjam 34.98 38.85 0 10.72

Gajapati 88.42 0 0 8.61

Kandhamal 103.07 0 0 0.83

Boudh 0 0 0 0

Sonepur 106.24 0 0 4.02

Bolangir 22.74 97.9 0 1.31

Nuapada 74.12 0 0 7.07

Kalahandi 49.41 101.02 0 1.87

Rayagada 99.49 0 0 2.4

Nawrangapur 0 90.57 0 1.92

Koraput 24.12 99.74 0 3.88

Malkangiri 0 0 0 0

Odisha 7.07 14.85 100.04 1.55


Annexure 63: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in rural Odisha ,

Central Sample

Access to latrine


household

Common use of

households in

building

Others No Latrine

Bargarh 59.82 76.05 0 3.57

Jharsuguda 0 0 0 0

Sambalpur 72.89 0 72.45 14.69

Deogarh 0 0 0 0

Sundargarh 88.45 64.34 0 8.05

Keonjhar 72.46 0 0 7.08

Mayurbhanj 49.73 29.92 0 5.93

Balasore 27.79 31.19 79.15 9.12

Bhadrak 62.56 21.21 0 4.64

Kendrapara 45.45 0 0 11.23

Jagatsinghpur 46.42 82.76 0 16.77

Cuttack 29.83 88.84 101.46 10.27

Jajpur 33.24 73.77 91.68 5.97

Dhenkanal 39.03 76.39 0 10.85

Angul 47.81 83.67 102.03 12.25

Nayagarh 21.9 99.17 0 7.84

Khurda 48.92 88.37 99.29 12.76

Puri 38.77 54.65 99.11 4.04

Ganjam 35.48 100.04 0 13.47

Gajapati 21.69 0 0 8.53

Kandhamal 13.05 0 0 0.61

Boudh 18.61 93.56 0 8.29

Subarnapur 99.37 71.15 0 13.93

Balangir 58.41 102.22 0 7.87

Nuapada 105.31 105.31 101.21 6.95

Kalahandi 44.11 51.7 0 25.65

Rayagada 79.07 83.28 0 13.16

Nabarangpur 65.73 0 0 2.31

Koraput 12.38 40.63 0 12.7

Malkangiri 0 0 0 0

Odisha 10.6 24.76 33.92 2.29


Annexure 64: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in urban

Odisha ,State Sample

Access to latrine

District exclusive use of the

household

common use of

households in

building

others No Latrine

Baragarh 6.37 9.5 0 10.68

Jharsuguda 34.6 65.39 0 47.65

Sambalpur 20.25 47.77 87.06 58.19

Deogarh 16.66 8.61 0 24.91

Sundargarh 15.32 38.85 0 9.62

Keonjhar 46.19 93.41 88.75 53.75

Mayurbhanja 6.17 18.19 0 23.08

Balasore 8.78 56.84 0 82.54

Bhadrak 57.11 59.91 0 24.3

Kendrapara 22.04 32.47 0 0

Jagatsinghpur 15.83 129.37 0 34.32

Cuttack 19.35 10.41 0 19.83

Jajpur 29.36 113.49 0 69.39

Dhenkanal 136.32 15.15 0 136.32

Angul 35.24 131.79 0 42.82

Nayagarh 11.03 0 0 10.75

Khurda 25.83 69.71 0 19.81

Puri 31.23 0 95.27 104.73

Ganjam 4.87 0.27 0 94.54

Gajapati 87.76 112.24 0 87.76

Kandhamal 1.64 3.3 0 13.93

Boudh 18.98 50.46 0 56.3

Sonepur 12.46 0 0 4.44

Bolangir 39.83 107.43 0 40.57

Nuapada 12.03 90.4 90.4 109.6

Kalahandi 8.72 0 0 30.91

Rayagada 44.94 0 0 90.73

Nawrangapur 19.39 25.38 0 122.48

Koraput 8.15 60.99 60.99 60.99

Malkangiri 19.1 66.17 0 42.1

Odisha 7.45 19.71 71.68 12.65


Annexure 65: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in urban Odisha ,

Central Sample

Access to latrine


household

Common use of

households in

building

Others No Latrine

Bargarh 2.6 7.08 105.6 43.07

Jharsuguda 3.62 10.89 0 56.4

Sambalpur 51.04 70.45 0 57.61

Deogarh 87.15 131.45 0 68.55

Sundargarh 6.31 17.06 0 46.67

Keonjhar 66.23 60.22 0 33.16

Mayurbhanj 38.01 26.33 0 31.33

Balasore 56.16 51.21 79.56 50.84

Bhadrak 19.12 4.88 0 22.21

Kendrapara 55.56 107.98 0 71.76

Jagatsinghpur 70.9 79.38 93.34 90.27

Cuttack 26.86 2.76 0 88.74

Jajpur 1.07 2.04 0 0

Dhenkanal 21.5 131.28 0 46.93

Angul 1.08 92.31 0 107.8

Nayagarh 3.17 133.55 0 20.4

Khurda 18.77 13.25 114.91 65.13

Puri 95.48 70.46 0 95.48

Ganjam 18.28 125.52 0 0

Gajapati 2.73 0 0 4.79

Kandhamal 10.74 113.64 0 113.64

Boudh 12.27 0 0 21.91

Subarnapur 91.57 108.43 0 29.17

Balangir 19.94 41.92 100.85 30.11

Nuapada 11.3 71.62 0 41.02

Kalahandi 38.11 121.52 0 116.34

Rayagada 39.82 74.29 0 0

Nabarangpur 57.85 81.11 0 118.89

Koraput 7.46 0 0 91.53

Malkangiri 64.42 72.73 0 0

Odisha 7.38 8.41 59.23 14.73


Annexure 66: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in

( rural + urban) Odisha ,State Sample

Access to latrine

District exclusive use of the

household

common use of

households in building

others No Latrine

Bargarh 14.3 35.23 0 6.06

Jharsuguda 46.54 82.69 0 16.22

Sambalpur 18.11 65.53 97.08 9.73

Deogarh 73.2 20.59 0 17.35

Sundargarh 6.35 46.02 0 2.18

Keonjhar 36.67 99.1 79.58 6.37

Mayurbhanj 23.02 60.55 0 7.52

Balasore 11.18 73.65 0 14.64

Bhadrak 24.7 69.39 0 5.18

Kendrapara 21.1 54.73 0 10.34

Jagatsinghpur 37.84 101.56 0 10.32

Cuttack 14.49 12.42 0 7.44

Jajpur 14.34 35.28 0 3.86

Dhenkanal 41.13 39.11 0 15.15

Angul 17.58 104.98 0 17.46

Nayagarh 44.68 0 0 6

Khurda 18.25 53.67 0 15.94

Puri 31.74 80.89 99.19 17.77

Ganjam 24.75 25.43 0 14.73

Gajapati 72.89 101.21 0 8.75

Kandhamal 59.83 73.42 0 4.69

Boudh 49.35 20.18 0 1.7

Subarnapur 72.15 0 0 3.91

Balangir 15.96 66.23 0 2.23

Nuapada 51.06 99.58 99.58 6.96

Kalahandi 18.55 100.94 0 2.18

Rayagada 53.26 0 0 6.51

Nabarangpur 41.19 61.06 0 3.03

Koraput 15.56 78.43 91.39 8.61

Malkangiri 12.41 97.54 0 1.3

Odisha 5.47 14.52 65.6 1.89


Annexure 67: Relative Standard Error (RSE) in % on access to latrine in (rural + urban)

Odisha , Central Sample

Access to latrine


household

Common use of

households in

building

Others No Latrine

Bargarh 35.17 50.95 100.79 4.81

Jharsuguda 2.25 7.44 0 5.08

Sambalpur 45.89 58.96 72.67 17.9

Deogarh 58.38 102.66 0 2.4

Sundargarh 16.81 18.05 0 9.54

Keonjhar 61.87 84.17 0 7.17

Mayurbhanj 35.28 32.66 0 6.31

Balasore 25.79 28.4 74.55 9.1

Bhadrak 46.58 29.94 0 7.48

Kendrapara 40.82 100.88 0 11.02

Jagatsinghpur 43.22 63.74 99.38 16.56

Cuttack 22.85 17.66 101.19 13.47

Jajpur 27.76 54.27 91.62 5.92

Dhenkanal 30.34 72.5 0 10.3

Angul 31.93 65.36 101.82 11.77

Nayagarh 19.3 89.69 0 7.6

Khurda 21.57 10.09 76.08 12.06

Puri 37.16 48.54 99.21 5.25

Ganjam 25.83 101.28 0 14.25

Gajapati 16.62 0 0 7.59

Kandhamal 16.64 101.49 0 1.56

Boudh 15.77 93.69 0 8.16

Subarnapur 80.61 69.27 0 13.27

Balangir 41.05 65.27 92.48 7.77

Nuapada 74.95 82.03 101.17 7.07

Kalahandi 38.73 51.91 0 24.65

Rayagada 29.62 63.04 0 11.58

Nabarangpur 54.83 99.24 0 3.49

Koraput 11.3 41.71 0 11.62

Malkangiri 39.48 97.66 0 2.34

Odisha 7.4 12.78 29.37 2.28


Annexure 68: District wise relative standard error (RSE in %) on Latrine facility for pooled

samples

District

Exclusive use of latrine No latrine

Rural Urban

Rural +

Urban Rural Urban

Rural +

Urban

Bargarh 22.96 3.27 14.97 3.10 9.70 3.82

Jharsuguda 10.18 17.35 18.94 0.11 54.77 10.94

Sambalpur 52.60 25.17 26.93 6.88 46.60 9.91

Deogarh 97.78 36.59 63.97 8.27 46.20 7.95

Sundargarh 29.43 6.22 9.63 4.21 15.39 4.43

Keonjhar 46.21 35.42 35.22 4.00 31.01 4.80

Mayurbhanj 24.08 15.77 19.51 4.75 20.41 4.88

Balasore 13.43 31.79 11.43 6.30 49.31 8.22

Bhadrak 26.24 34.06 22.26 3.54 17.16 4.58

Kendrapara 22.77 27.10 20.73 7.73 51.49 7.59

Jagatsinghpur 34.20 19.08 29.20 9.28 46.09 9.37

Cuttack 18.57 16.98 13.33 6.68 37.74 8.27

Jajpur 18.36 14.05 15.53 3.60 57.35 3.56

Dhenkanal 34.63 41.74 30.69 8.91 73.49 8.83

Angul 19.42 15.70 15.60 10.28 45.72 10.05

Nayagarh 25.43 6.05 21.64 4.93 11.36 4.79

Khurda 15.45 16.88 13.61 11.24 23.59 9.90

Puri 38.28 26.03 25.65 8.20 72.11 8.45

Ganjam 24.96 9.89 17.92 8.61 88.09 10.24

Gajapati 25.96 22.03 21.08 6.16 42.96 5.95

Kandhamal 21.09 6.71 23.98 0.52 90.57 2.49

Boudh 18.01 11.34 19.42 3.84 27.48 3.94

Subarnapur 92.16 47.68 55.20 6.83 14.01 6.52

Balangir 36.42 21.25 24.84 3.85 26.17 3.89

Nuapada 61.76 8.61 43.49 4.96 39.75 4.96

Kalahandi 32.86 19.25 24.59 9.78 51.66 9.57

Rayagada 61.22 30.07 29.85 6.22 91.01 6.37

Nabarangpur 57.51 26.47 33.37 1.50 104.82 2.32

Koraput 25.00 5.57 12.28 6.23 82.61 7.22

Malkangiri 0 29.39 19.33 0.00 41.89 1.33

Odisha 6.10 5.17 4.48 1.39 9.84 1.48


Annexure 69 : District wise relative standard error on no latrine for state, central and pooled

samples



Bargarh 3.57 5.21 3.10 43.07 10.68 9.70 4.81 6.06 3.82

Jharsuguda 0 0.23 0.11 56.4 47.65 54.77 5.08 16.22 10.94

Sambalpur 14.69 1.07 6.88 57.61 58.19 46.60 17.9 9.73 9.91

Deogarh 0 18.1 8.27 68.55 24.91 46.20 2.4 17.35 7.95

Sundargarh 8.05 1.49 4.21 46.67 9.62 15.39 9.54 2.18 4.43

Keonjhar 7.08 3.81 4.00 33.16 53.75 31.01 7.17 6.37 4.80

Mayurbhanj 5.93 7.52 4.75 31.33 23.08 20.41 6.31 7.52 4.88

Balasore 9.12 8.6 6.30 50.84 82.54 49.31 9.1 14.64 8.22

Bhadrak 4.64 5.4 3.54 22.21 24.3 17.16 7.48 5.18 4.58

Kendrapara 11.23 10.5 7.73 71.76 0 51.49 11.02 10.34 7.59

Jagatsinghpur 16.77 9.66 9.28 90.27 34.32 46.09 16.56 10.32 9.37

Cuttack 10.27 8.1 6.68 88.74 19.83 37.74 13.47 7.44 8.27

Jajpur 5.97 3.99 3.60 0 69.39 57.35 5.92 3.86 3.56

Dhenkanal 10.85 14.47 8.91 46.93 136.3 73.49 10.3 15.15 8.83

Angul 12.25 17.74 10.28 107.8 42.82 45.72 11.77 17.46 10.05

Nayagarh 7.84 6.16 4.93 20.4 10.75 11.36 7.6 6 4.79

Khurda 12.76 20.98 11.24 65.13 19.81 23.59 12.06 15.94 9.90

Puri 4.04 17.35 8.20 95.48 104.7 72.11 5.25 17.77 8.45

Ganjam 13.47 10.72 8.61 0 94.54 88.09 14.25 14.73 10.24

Gajapati 8.53 8.61 6.16 4.79 87.76 42.96 7.59 8.75 5.95

Kandhamal 0.61 0.83 0.52 113.6 13.93 90.57 1.56 4.69 2.49

Boudh 8.29 0 3.84 21.91 56.3 27.48 8.16 1.7 3.94

Subarnapur 13.93 4.02 6.83 29.17 4.44 14.01 13.27 3.91 6.52

Balangir 7.87 1.31 3.85 30.11 40.57 26.17 7.77 2.23 3.89

Nuapada 6.95 7.07 4.96 41.02 109.6 39.75 7.07 6.96 4.96

Kalahandi 25.65 1.87 9.78 116.3 30.91 51.66 24.65 2.18 9.57

Rayagada 13.16 2.4 6.22 0 90.73 91.01 11.58 6.51 6.37

Nabarangpur 2.31 1.92 1.50 118.9 122.5 104.82 3.49 3.03 2.32

Koraput 12.7 3.88 6.23 91.53 60.99 82.61 11.62 8.61 7.22

Malkangiri 0 0 0.00 0 42.1 41.89 2.34 1.3 1.33

Odisha 2.29 1.55 1.39 14.73 12.65 9.84 2.28 1.89 1.48


Appendix C

Annexure Tables ( IV Method )


Annexure 70: District wise households (per thousand) on attached bathroom facility

for state, central and pooled samples (IV-method)



Bargarh 0 98 0.00 656 645 647.52 54 194 57.48

Jharsuguda 0 13 0.00 586 436 482.73 357 181 236.22

Sambalpur 130 21 22.84 420 411 411.13 235 145 151.97

Deogarh 0 0 0.00 74 136 79.06 6 12 6.09

Sundargarh 41 23 27.51 516 253 316.91 223 90 118.64

Keonjhar 0 0 0.00 171 17 20.27 14 2 2.29

Mayurbhanj 1 30 1.40 123 689 557.73 12 59 39.68

Balasore 32 33 32.74 86 478 96.12 37 133 45.74

Bhadrak 10 30 12.85 34 255 34.83 13 57 17.75

Kendrapara 17 283 24.07 445 574 565.69 50 294 91.48

Jagatsinghpur 114 0 0.00 315 460 323.48 131 42 56.59

Cuttack 70 17 37.08 387 61 81.35 150 32 43.84

Jajpur 13 43 17.53 927 412 501.72 47 66 50.21

Dhenkanal 8 95 9.67 195 729 321.31 18 174 20.15

Angul 106 36 43.50 800 453 733.30 172 100 106.85

Nayagarh 118 6 9.21 208 76 186.21 123 9 13.37

Khurda 52 0 0.00 374 502 409.78 216 299 238.80

Puri 11 106 11.69 35 524 44.37 14 184 15.48

Ganjam 7 0 0.00 564 576 575.93 93 109 93.90

Gajapati 60 6 8.95 448 559 448.11 94 60 84.99

Kandhamal 17 0 0.00 309 640 310.32 33 40 34.00

Boudh 32 27 29.20 386 73 247.23 39 29 33.31

Subarnapur 6 0 0.00 160 154 154.78 16 10 10.55

Balangir 0 1 0.00 210 69 196.18 20 10 19.06

Nuapada 37 3 3.20 520 743 732.11 56 39 39.45

Kalahandi 15 1 1.09 156 294 256.06 22 27 26.56

Rayagada 108 6 6.95 880 412 732.18 198 59 102.90

Nabarangpur 10 0 0.00 529 125 212.71 35 10 15.34

Koraput 6 12 6.02 925 265 556.92 87 68 77.44

Malkangiri 0 0 0.00 453 799 782.03 39 59 54.32

Odisha 30 33 31.50 423 385 407.32 89 98 92.37


Annexure 71: District wise households( per thousand ) without bathroom for state, central and

pooled samples (IV-method)



Bargarh 513.23 569.5 539.41 759.91 846.01 771.76 530.76 587.87 554.20

Jharsuguda 625.11 531.52 550.54 847.77 623.8 627.10 706.86 573.44 591.25

Sambalpur 551.59 482.82 540.40 981.42 607.42 667.34 667.04 513.95 599.01

Deogarh 510.19 467 482.55 710.76 858.31 778.88 518.71 498.5 506.79

Sundargarh 493.97 465.12 476.82 733.77 573.46 584.33 588.19 513.35 520.64

Keonjhar 524.25 536.99 535.07 1082.64 791.29 799.17 570.21 571.69 571.53

Mayurbhanj 456.78 430.98 450.18 841.46 867.05 844.33 472.56 463.62 470.59

Balasore 576.26 439.37 485.64 853.33 821.95 842.31 618.61 492.23 534.15

Bhadrak 571.78 715.98 693.16 636.43 995.72 640.43 577.17 739.29 694.11

Kendrapara 672.59 677.11 677.11 913.15 871.93 901.29 683.58 691.84 691.72

Jagatsinghpur 561.47 672.21 586.37 1109.32 768.95 781.55 605.78 685.77 641.10

Cuttack 678.38 636.74 665.81 1060.63 1052.97 1056.63 766.01 796.79 770.58

Jajpur 585.05 586.6 585.74 733.51 928.61 797.90 590.96 611.53 600.21

Dhenkanal 793.46 550.99 750.67 1161.92 767.02 767.70 826.72 572.02 761.95

Angul 668.14 556.7 587.06 1036.25 1484.29 1382.81 709.57 663.07 673.49

Nayagarh 627.96 552.5 564.53 855.49 639.63 642.93 647.43 556.05 570.94

Khurda 594.12 657.79 640.13 1065.6 1135.5 1131.75 809.5 892.71 886.81

Puri 603.77 700.68 671.88 764.9 878.32 790.55 645.22 718.66 692.42

Ganjam 634.42 499.55 528.33 763.1 786.91 784.71 651.75 546.63 566.20

Gajapati 493.86 361.97 376.55 836.39 604.69 836.37 532.17 379.37 400.99

Kandhamal 530.03 393.05 399.32 1055.54 595.44 677.36 554.57 411.03 418.48

Boudh 490.29 391.61 414.23 706.18 842.04 823.07 500.52 400.42 420.75

Subarnapur 482.04 447.22 455.86 516.97 815.43 663.15 484.76 470.92 475.70

Balangir 563.68 391.76 440.20 677.83 567.57 673.99 575.34 407.07 454.90

Nuapada 559.69 670.69 584.20 719.37 781.98 752.55 567.06 674.04 589.98

Kalahandi 527.55 600.96 550.06 670.11 790.91 697.79 537.19 612.48 559.72

Rayagada 613.01 386.24 479.98 661.5 644.62 659.85 619.46 417.6 541.69

Nabarangpur 539.56 489.66 498.54 948.66 886.54 919.13 555.12 515.04 522.08

Koraput 510.07 299.82 319.09 853.69 585.66 609.59 562.34 344.04 362.58

Malkangiri 407.57 482.1 444.86 599.95 680.47 613.18 418.45 498.58 455.58

Odisha 573.05 528.04 546.92 881.67 853.96 864.37 618.76 582.35 599.34


Annexure 72: District wise households (per thousand) on exclusive use of latrine facility for

state, central and pooled samples (IV-method)



Bargarh 73 193 135.29 780 596 739.15 131 264 210.57

Jharsuguda 0 22 0.00 354 346 353.91 215 151 214.70

Sambalpur 148 48 48.87 538 644 624.49 289 239 243.81

Deogarh 0 158 0.00 358 529 516.36 30 189 32.51

Sundargarh 67 144 140.60 540 322 469.59 248 196 200.26

Keonjhar 89 68 72.62 210 368 273.36 99 113 108.60

Mayurbhanj 98 211 146.18 433 770 744.08 127 235 170.94

Balasore 175 368 263.77 496 423 424.28 203 380 309.72

Bhadrak 49 161 84.33 264 364 269.57 74 186 114.34

Kendrapara 192 294 255.94 283 596 467.34 199 305 264.12

Jagatsinghpur 260 166 194.89 232 692 550.67 258 214 229.19

Cuttack 217 248 234.81 472 415 431.32 281 307 298.57

Jajpur 136 131 131.78 655 587 654.89 155 160 158.89

Dhenkanal 76 236 89.04 377 95 297.62 92 218 103.13

Angul 206 481 352.91 871 699 870.75 269 515 385.53

Nayagarh 153 102 139.28 442 494 445.23 168 118 154.28

Khurda 154 424 342.14 349 639 388.46 253 552 320.84

Puri 73 252 82.10 149 749 311.01 82 344 100.93

Ganjam 274 226 245.11 873 793 797.43 366 333 347.25

Gajapati 282 89 209.31 637 214 633.40 314 101 242.76

Kandhamal 45 8 32.55 914 614 617.12 94 46 82.28

Boudh 60 0 0.00 641 742 665.01 71 35 60.35

Subarnapur 6 36 6.71 281 263 263.29 25 51 31.00

Balangir 87 57 58.83 400 314 375.14 117 91 93.18

Nuapada 37 87 50.37 413 742 483.63 52 119 71.53

Kalahandi 153 35 42.27 756 780 778.73 184 103 108.43

Rayagada 45 24 30.52 651 669 658.68 116 109 114.18

Nabarangpur 14 0 0.00 594 793 759.80 43 64 52.33

Koraput 6 87 6.10 925 882 904.38 87 264 96.59

Malkangiri 0 0 0 530 719 692.68 45 53 52.04

Odisha 124 170 149.05 496 561 524.22 180 241 210.82


Annexure 73: District wise households (per thousand ) without latrine for state, central and

pooled samples (IV-method)


Center State Pooled Center State Pooled Center State Pooled

Bargarh 899 807 865.13 48 231 123.49 828 706 771.36

Jharsuguda 1000 978 1000.00 121 473 150.56 465 777 475.59

Sambalpur 822 952 951.08 340 133 160.95 649 690 679.73

Deogarh 1000 842 1000.00 578 292 301.32 964 796 959.41

Sundargarh 911 856 857.61 177 569 449.39 629 772 761.57

Keonjhar 911 929 924.83 658 516 603.71 891 867 877.26

Mayurbhanj 854 783 823.81 310 117 130.85 807 754 783.34

Balasore 751 626 673.74 377 262 326.41 718 544 648.00

Bhadrak 890 839 866.86 319 487 363.33 824 796 804.66

Kendrapara 791 693 732.35 343 0 0.00 756 668 703.85

Jagatsinghpur 708 834 794.28 183 294 263.84 663 784 741.42

Cuttack 757 583 629.90 140 215 207.10 602 454 475.88

Jajpur 814 798 802.81 0 162 0.00 784 758 765.39

Dhenkanal 809 740 781.27 504 5 5.41 793 648 733.69

Angul 776 519 643.40 64 168 113.83 708 465 583.34

Nayagarh 808 898 859.06 475 506 498.57 791 882 842.27

Khurda 770 454 607.10 50 114 93.22 404 252 313.51

Puri 870 726 859.60 276 237 255.33 797 635 777.42

Ganjam 725 725 725.00 0 41 0.00 614 596 605.03

Gajapati 718 911 791.10 363 347 362.95 686 856 741.39

Kandhamal 955 992 967.34 43 15 15.05 903 931 905.64

Boudh 861 1000 1000.00 359 177 289.14 851 962 956.17

Subarnapur 837 964 951.37 659 737 734.80 824 949 936.09

Balangir 879 941 939.09 353 581 391.53 830 893 887.52

Nuapada 923 913 918.03 415 72 132.67 903 872 886.72

Kalahandi 537 962 954.87 163 220 213.51 518 895 886.40

Rayagada 829 976 969.52 0 331 0.00 732 891 840.29

Nabarangpur 969 979 974.86 336 104 125.41 938 909 921.02

Koraput 755 897 880.47 75 30 32.98 696 705 701.76

Malkangiri 1000 1000 0.00 0 201 0.00 914 941 934.34

Odisha 813 807 808.87 182 230 204.04 718 702 708.34


Annexure 74: District wise Average Floor area in 0.00 (sqr. mts) Inverse Variance (IV)

method

Name of the District Rural Urban Rural+Urban

BARGARH 33.42 0.00 35.61

JHARSUGUDA 41.01 0.00 37.59

SAMBALPUR 36.23 39.46 34.24

DEOGARH 32.01 0.00 31.73

SUNDARGARH 49.26 0.00 53.92

KEONJHAR 41.58 37.27 40.92

MAYURBHANJ 39.86 50.10 40.94

BALASORE 30.71 58.82 32.12

BHADRAK 35.23 30.19 34.64

KENDRAPARA 34.66 33.18 34.52

JAGATSINGHPUR 30.25 33.36 30.11

CUTTACK 45.58 40.08 43.72

JAJPUR 28.60 0.00 29.14

DHENKANAL 27.03 25.01 26.10

ANGUL 32.50 59.57 36.47

NAYAGARH 26.89 23.69 26.76

KHURDA 41.53 47.04 36.71

PURI 40.65 32.66 34.63

GANJAM 37.50 0.00 39.29

GAJAPATI 39.86 43.25 40.66

KANDHAMAL 23.60 0.00 24.31

BOUDH 23.22 49.67 23.72

SUBARNAPUR 32.20 27.58 31.98

BALANGIR 27.03 25.60 26.82

NUAPADA 26.03 0.00 26.63

KALAHANDI 40.65 0.00 41.53

RAYAGADA 23.83 0.00 24.63

NABARANGPUR 30.93 36.78 31.41

KORAPUT 23.22 40.35 27.03

MALKANGIRI 0.00 0.00 32.50

ODISHA 36.22 47.99 37.42

185

Appendix D

Schedule 0.0 & 1.2

186

RURAL * GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CENTRAL * URBAN NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY OFFICE STATE

SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY

SIXTY-NINTH ROUND: JULY 2012 - DECEMBER 2012

SCHEDULE 0.0: LIST OF HOUSEHOLDS

[0] descriptive identification of sample village/block

1. state/ u.t.: 4. village name:

2. district: 5. investigator unit:

3. tehsil/ town*: 6. block:

[1] identification of sample village/block

ite

m

no.

item code item

no.

item code

1. serial number of sample

village/block 11. sub-sample

2. round number 6 9 12. FOD sub-region

3. schedule number 0 0 13. frame code

4. sample (central-1, state-

2) 14. frame population / households @

5. sector (rural-1, urban-2) 15. approx. present population

6. NSS region 16. total number of hg’s/sb’s formed

(D)

7. district 17. survey code

8. stratum 18. reason code for substitution of

original sample (for codes 4 – 7 in

item 17)

9. sub-stratum 19. number of slums lying wholly or

partly within the sample block

(for urban only)

10. sub-round

items 1, 4 – 11 and 13 – 14 to be copied from the sample list

CODES FOR BLOCK 1

item 13: frame code: rural: 2001 census – 13

urban: 2007-12 UFS – 15

item 17: survey code: selected village/block: surveyed:

inhabited – 1, uninhabited – 2, zero case – 3

selected village/block casualty but substitute village/block surveyed:

inhabited – 4, uninhabited – 5, zero case – 6

selected village/block casualty and no substitute surveyed – 7

item 18: reason for substitution of original sample (code): sample village/block:

not identifiable/traceable – 1

not accessible – 2

restricted area (not permitted to survey) – 3

others (specify) – 9

*tick mark () may be put in the appropriate place @ population for sample village and households for sample block

187

[8] remarks by investigator/ asst. superintending officer

[9] comments by supervisory officer(s)

[2] particulars of field operations

srl.

no. item

field investigator (FI) /

asst. superintending officer (ASO)

field officer (FO)/

superintending officer (SO)

(1) (2) (3) (4)

1(a).

(i) name (block letters)

(ii) employee code

(iii) signature

1(b).

(i) name (block letters)

(ii) employee code

(iii) signature

2.

date(s) of:

DD MM YY DD MM YY

(i) commencement of survey/ inspection

(ii) completion of survey / inspection

(iii) receipt

(iv) scrutiny

(v) despatch

3. number of additional sheet(s) attached

4. total time taken to canvass the schedule by the team of investigators (FI/ASO)

(in hours) [no decimal point]

5. number of investigators (FI/ASO) in the team

6.

whether any

remarks have been

entered by

FI/ASO/supervisor

y officer

(yes-1, no-2)

(i) in block 8/ 9

(ii) elsewhere in the schedule

188

[3] sketch map of hamlet-group (hg)/ sub-block (sb) formation

189

[4.1] list of hamlets (only for rural

samples with hg formation)

[4.2] list and selection of hamlet-groups (hg’s)/

sub-blocks (sb’s)

D = se

rial

nu

mb

er

name of hamlet

% of

popu-

lation

serial no.

of hg/ sb

serial no. of

hamlets in the hg

(rural only)

% of

population

in the

hg/ sb

sampling

serial

number of

the hg/ sb

*

sample

hg/ sb

number #

(1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

total 100 total 100

* ‘0’ for hg/ sb having maximum percentage share of population

# ‘1’ for hg/sb with '0' in col (4)

190

[6] particulars of sampling of households

sch

edule

hg

/sb

nu

mb

er *

po

pu

lati

on second

stage

stratum

(SSS)

number of

households

listed

(H)

number of households

selected

(h)

surveyed

casualty

[col.6-

col.9]

originally

selected substituted

total

[col.7+

col.8]

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

1.2

1

1

2

3

all (9)

2

1

2

3

all (9)

*If no hg/ sb is formed, entries may be made against hg/ sb number 1

191

[7] distance of the village to the nearest facility, availability of some amenities and participation in

MGNREG work (for inhabited villages only)

srl.

no. item

distance

(in

code)

srl.

no. item

distance

(in

code) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)

distance to the nearest facility (code): for items 1 – 23 and 24(b)

1. gram panchayat headquarters 16. post office

2. bus stop 17. fair price shop

3. boat jetty 18. cooperative credit society

4. metalled road 19. commercial bank

5. school having primary level classes 20. PCO

6. school having secondary level classes 21. veterinary hospital/ dispensary

7. higher secondary school/ junior

college 22. fertilizer/ pesticide shop

8. health sub-centre/ dispensary 23.

agricultural produce market / rural

primary market

availability of amenities (code): for items 24 – 26

9. primary health centre 24.

drinking

water

(code)

(a) major source

10. community health centre (b) distance

11. government hospital 25. type of drainage arrangement (code)

12. AYUSH Unit 26. electricity connection (code)

13. private clinic/ doctor participation in MGNREG work

14. medicine shop 27.

whether the villagers participated in

MGNREG programme during last

365 days (yes – 1, no – 2)

15. anganwadi centre (ICDS)

28. informant code

CODES FOR BLOCK 7

items 1 to 23 and 24 (b): distance (in code): within village – 1; outside village: less than 5 kms – 2, 5 kms or

more – 3

item 24 (a): major source of drinking water: bottled water – 01, tap – 02, tube well / hand pump – 03,

well: protected – 04, unprotected – 05;

tank / pond (reserved for drinking) – 06, other tank / pond – 07,

river/ canal/ lake – 08, spring– 10, harvested rainwater – 11, others –

19

item 25: type of drainage arrangement: underground – 1, covered pucca – 2, open pucca – 3, open katcha – 4,

no drainage – 5

item 26: electricity connection: yes: (percentage of households connected) P < 25% – 1, 25% ≤ P < 50% – 2,

P ≥50% – 3; no – 4

item 28: informant code: sarpanch (male) – 1, sarpanch (female) – 2, other panchayat member – 3,

patwari/ gram sevak – 4, teacher – 5, health personnel – 6, others – 9

192

[5] list of households and record of selection for households (hg/sb 1 / 2)*

ho

use

num

ber

ho

use

ho

ld

seri

al n

um

ber

name of head of household

ho

use

ho

ld s

ize

stru

ctu

re t

yp

e co

de

(ru

ral)

urban schedule 1.2

aver

age

mo

nth

ly t

ota

l co

nsu

mer

exp

end

iture

for

the

enti

re h

ou

seh

old

(`)

MP

CE

(`)

(co

l. 6

÷ c

ol.

4)

MP

CE

co

de

SSS

sampling serial

number

sample

household

number

cod

e 1

in

co

l. 5

(R

)

or

in c

ol.

8

(U

)

cod

e 2

in

co

l. 5

(R

)

or

in c

ol.

8

(U

)

cod

e 3

in

co

l. 5

(R

)

or

in c

ol.

8

(U

)

1 2 3 1 2 3

H= H= H= h= h= h=

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

page total cum. total

CODES FOR BLOCK 5

col.(5): structure type code (only for rural samples): pucca – 1, semi pucca – 2, others (including those with no

structure) – 3 col.(8): MPCE code (only for urban samples): MPCE B 1, A ≤ MPCE ≤ B 2, MPCE < A 3

* strike out which is not applicable

193

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY OFFICE

SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY

SIXTY-NINTH ROUND: JULY 2012 – DECEMBER 2012

SCHEDULE 1.2: DRINKING WATER, SANITATION, HYGIENE

and HOUSING CONDITION

[1] identification of sample household

item

no.

item code item

no.

item code

1. srl. no. of sample

village/block 11. sub-sample

2. round number 6 9 12. FOD sub-region

3. schedule number 1 2 0 13. sample hg/sb number

(1/2)

4. sample (central-1, state-2) 14. second-stage stratum

5. sector (rural-1, urban-2) 15. sample household

number

6. NSS region 16. informant’s relation to

head (code)

7. district 17. response code

8. stratum 18. survey code

9. sub-stratum

19.

reason for substitution of

original household

(code)

10. sub-round

RURAL * CENTRAL *

URBAN STATE

[0] descriptive identification of sample household

1. state/u.t.: 5. hamlet name:

2. district: 6. inv. unit /block:

3. tehsil/town:* 7. name of head of household:

4. village name: 8. name of informant:

194

Codes for Block 1 item 16: informant’s relation to head: head of household – 1, other member(s) of household – 2, non- member of the

household closely associated with the household –9.

item 17: response code: informant: co-operative and capable -1, co-operative but not capable -2, busy -3, reluctant -4,

others -9.

item 18: survey code: household surveyed: original -1, substitute -2, casualty -3.

item 19: reason for substitution of original household: informant busy -1, members away from home -2, informant

non-cooperative -3, others -9.

* tick mark ( ) may be put in the appropriate place.

Codes for Block 3

item 6 and item 7: level of education:

not literate -01, literate without formal schooling: 02; literate: below primary -03, primary -04, upper primary/

middle -05, secondary -06, higher secondary -07, diploma/certificate course (below graduate level) -08,

graduate -09, postgraduate and above -10.

item 10: household type:

for rural areas: self-employed in: agriculture-1, non-agriculture -2; regular wage/salary earning-3,

casual labour in: agriculture-4, non-agriculture -5; others -9.

for urban areas: self-employed -1, regular wage/salary earning -2, casual labour -3, others -9.

item 11: religion: Hinduism -1, Islam -2, Christianity -3, Sikhism -4, Jainism -5, Buddhism -6, Zoroastrianism -

7, others -9.

item 12: social group: scheduled tribe -1, scheduled caste -2, other backward class -3, others-9.

item 13: land possessed (area in hectare):

area in hectare code area in hectare code

less than 0.005 ……… 01 2.01 – 3.01 ………….. 07

0.005 - 0.02 …………. 02 3.01 - 4.01 …………… 08

0.02 - 0.21 …………... 03 4.01 - 6.01 …………… 10

0.21 - 0.41…………… 04 6.01 - 8.01 ……….….. 11

0.41 - 1.01 …………… 05 greater than or equal to

8.01…...…………. 12 1.01 – 2.01 …………… 06

Note: 1 acre = 0.4047 hectare, 1 hectare=10,000 square metre

195

item 14: tenurial status of dwelling: owned: freehold-1, leasehold-2; hired: employer quarter-3, hired dwelling

units with written contract-4, hired dwelling units without written contract-5; others-

9, no dwelling –6.

item 16: distance: not required to travel-1; travelled a distance of: less than 1 k.m.-2, 1 k.m. or more but less

than 5 k.m.-3, 5 k.m. or more but less than 10 k.m. – 4, 10 k.m. or more but less than 15 k.m.

– 5, 15 k.m. or more but less than 30 k.m. – 6, 30 k.m. or more-7.

item 25: sources of finance:

own source (including own labour )......................... 01

institutional agencies

government...................................................... 02

bank ................................................................. 03

insurance.......................................................... 04

provident fund (advance/loan)......................... 05

financial corporation/institution....................... 06

other institutional agencies............................. 07

non-institutional agencies

money lender.......................................... 08

friends and relatives................................ 09

other non-institutional agencies.............. 10

Schedule 1.2: 196

196

[3] household characteristics

1.

household

size

male

16.

maximum distance to the place of work

normally travelled by any earner of the

household (code)

2. female

3. total

(sum of items 1 and 2)

4. gender of the head of the household

(male –1, female –2)

household consumer expenditure (`) during last 30 days

out of:

5.

age of the head of the household

(less than 18 years-1, 18 years and above-

2)

6. highest level of education among the male

members of the household (code)

17. purchase

7. highest level of education among the

female members of the household (code)

18. home produced stock

8.

principal

industry

(NIC-

2008)

description: 19. receipts in exchange of goods and services

code

(5-digit)

20. gifts and loans

9.

principal

occupati

on

(NCO-

2004)

description:

21. free collection

code

(3-digit)

22. total (items 17 to 21)

1

0. household type (code)

information on construction/ purchase of houses or flats

1

1. religion (code)

23.

whether any amount was spent on

construction/first-hand purchase of

houses/flats for residential purpose during

last 365 days

(yes-1, no-2)

1

2. social group (code)

1

3.

land possessed as on date of survey

(code)

24.

if 1 in

item 23,

amount spent during last 365

days (`)

1

4. tenurial status of dwelling (code)

25.

sources of finance (four different

sources in descending order of

amount financed)

(codes)

1

5.

if entry 1 to 5 or 9 in item 14, area type

in which the dwelling unit is located

(notified slum-1, non-notified slum-2,

squatter settlement-3, other areas-9)

Schedule 1.2: 197

197

[4] particulars of living facilities: drinking water, bathroom, sanitation, etc.

srl.

no.

item code/

entry

(1) (2) (3)

A. drinking water

1.

principal source of drinking water

(bottled water-01, piped water into dwelling-02, piped water to yard/plot-03, public tap/standpipe-04, tube

well/borehole-05, well: protected-06, unprotected-07; spring: protected-08, unprotected-09; rainwater

collection -10, surface water: tank/pond-11, other surface water (river, dam, stream, canal, lake, etc.)-12,

others (tanker-truck, cart with small tank or drum, etc)-19)

2. whether availability of drinking water from the principal source is sufficient throughout the year?

(yes– 1, no – 2)

3.

if code 2 in item 2, during which calendar months of

the year availability of drinking water was not

sufficient?

(record ‘1’ against the applicable month(s) and

rest of the months to be left blank)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

4.

access to the principal source of drinking water

(household’s exclusive use- 1, common use of households in the building -2, neighbour’s source -3,

community use: public source restricted to particular community -4, public source unrestricted-5, private

source restricted to particular community-6, private source unrestricted-7; others-9)

5.

distance to the principal source of drinking water

(within dwelling – 1, outside dwelling but within the premises – 2, outside premises: less than 0.2 k.m. – 3,

0.2 to 0.5 k.m. – 4, 0.5 to 1.0 k.m. – 5, 1.0 k.m. to 1.5 k.m. –6, 1.5 k.m. or more –7)

6.

if codes 3 to 7 in item 5, who fetches drinking water?

(member of the household: male of age below 18 years-1, male of age 18 years or more-2, female of age

below 18 years-3, female of age 18 years or more-4; non- member of the household: hired labour-5, others-

6)

7. if codes 3 to 7 in item 5 and codes 1 to 4 in item 6, time taken, in a day, to reach the source of drinking

water and back (in minutes)

8. if codes 3 to 7 in item 5 and codes 1 to 4 in item 6, waiting time, in a day, at the source of drinking

water (in minutes)

9. quality of drinking water from the principal source

(bad in taste-1,bad in smell-2,bad in taste and smell-3,bad due to other reasons-4, no defect-5)

10. if codes 04 to 07 in item 1, is there stagnant water around the source of drinking water? (yes-1, no-2)

Schedule 1.2: 198

198


srl.

no.

item code/

entry

(1) (2) (3)

11.

supplementary source of drinking water

(code structure same as item 1: principal source of drinking water )

12.

method of treatment of drinking water by the household

(treated: electronic purifier-1, boiling-2, chemically treated with alum-3, chemically treated with

bleach/chlorine tablets-4, filtered with water filter (candle, ceramic, sand, etc.)-5, filtered with cloth-6,

others-9; not treated-7)

13.

material of the main container in which drinking water is stored

(non-metal: earthen-01, plastic-02, other non-metal-03; metal: iron-04, galvanised iron-05, copper-06,

stainless steel-07, brass-08, other metal-09; no storage-10)

14.

for entry 01 to 09, in item 13, how drinking water is taken out from the main container?

(through tap-1, vessel with handle dipped in to take out water-2, vessel without handle dipped in to take

out water-3, poured out-4)

continued to next page

B. water for all household activities

15. principal source of water for all household activities excluding drinking (viz., cooking, washing, bathing,

etc.) (code structure same as item 1: principal source of drinking water)

16. whether the household gets sufficient water throughout the year for all household activities (viz., drinking,

cooking, washing, bathing, etc.) (yes-1, no-2)?

17. for entry 02, 03 and 04 in either item 1, 11 or 15, frequency of supply of water ( daily -1, once in two

days-2, once in three days-3, once in a week-4, others-9)

18. for entry 02 and 03 in either item 1, 11 or 15, whether water is metered ( yes-1, no-2)

19.

water charges paid

(payable) per month to

the delivery agency/

organisation/ office

19.1

whether water charges paid (paid and information on full amount of

payment is available -1, paid and information on some amount of

payment is available -2, paid but no information on amount paid is

separately available -3, not required to pay-4)

19.2 for entry 1 and 2 in item 19.1, average amount paid per month (`)

C. bathroom

20. facility of bathroom ( attached – 1, detached – 2, no bathroom – 3)

Schedule 1.2: 199

199


srl.

no.

item code/

entry

(1) (2) (3)

21. for code 1 and 2 in item 20, access to bathroom

(exclusive use of household- 1, common use of households in the building – 2, public/community use – 3,

others -9)

22. distance from the bathing place

(within dwelling – 1, outside dwelling but within the premises – 2, outside premises: less than 0.2 k.m. – 3,

0.2 to 0.5 k.m. – 4, 0.5 to 1.0 k.m. – 5, 1.0 k.m. to 1.5 k.m.-6, 1.5 k.m. or more –7)

D. latrine

23. access to latrine (exclusive use of household-1, common use of households in the building -2,

public/community latrine without payment-3, public/community latrine with payment-4, others -9, no latrine-

5)

24. for codes 1, 2, 3,4 or 9 in item 23, type of latrine

(used: flush/pour-flush to: piped sewer system-01, septic tank-02, pit latrine-03, elsewhere (open drain,

open pit, open field, etc)-04; ventilated improved pit latrine-05, pit latrine with slab-06, pit latrine without

slab/open pit-07, composting toilet-08, others-09; not used-10 )

25. for code 10 in item 24, reason for not using latrine

(no superstructure -1, not clean/insufficient water-2, malfunctioning of the latrine-3, personal preference -4,

cannot afford charges for paid latrine-5, others-9)

26. for entry 1, 2, 3, 4 or 9 in item 23, whether all

household members of categories specified in items 26.1

to 26.4 are using latrine (yes-1, no-2, not applicable-3)

[if the household has no member of a specific category,

record ‘3’ against the respective category to indicate not

applicable cases]

26.1 male of age below 15 years

26.2 male of age 15 years and above

26.3 female of age below 15 years

26.4 female of age 15 years and above

E. problem of flies and mosquitoes

27. whether the household faced problem of flies/mosquitoes during last 365 days (yes: severe-1, moderate-2;

no-3)

Schedule 1.2: 200

200


srl.

no.

item code/

entry

(1) (2) (3)

28. whether any effort was made by the Local Bodies/State Government during last 365 days to tackle

problem of flies/mosquitoes (yes-1, no-2, not known-3)

29. whether any effort was made by the household during last 365 days to tackle problem of flies/mosquitoes

(yes-1, no-2, not applicable - 3)

F. specific types of illness of the household members during last 30 days

30.

whether any of the household member(s)

suffered from the types of illness

specified in items 30.1 to 30.4 during last

30 days

30.1 stomach problem (yes-1, no-2)

30.2 malaria (yes-1, no-2)

30.3 skin disease (yes-1, no-2)

30.4 fever due to disease other than malaria (yes-1, no-2)

G. electricity

31. whether the household has electricity for domestic use? (yes-1, no-2)

32. if code 1 in item 31, type of electric wiring

(conduit wiring – 1, fixed to the walls – 2, temporary – 3)

201

[5] housing characteristics and micro environment (for the households living in houses, i.e.,

with codes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 9 in item 14 of block 3)

srl.

no.

item code / entry

(1) (2) (3)

1. plinth level (in feet and in whole numbers) (record ‘0’, if there is no plinth)

2. number of floor (s) in the house

3. use of house (residential only – 1, residential-cum-commercial – 2,

residential-cum-others – 9)

4.

if codes 1 or 2 in item 14 of block 3 (i.e., for the household with own

dwelling), period since built

(less than 1 year – 1, 1 to 5 years – 2, 5 to 10 years – 3, 10 to 20 years –

4, 20 to 40 years – 5, 40 to 60 years – 6, 60 to 80 years – 7, 80 years or

more – 8, not known-9)

if code 1 or 2 in item 4,

5.

year of start

Y Y Y Y

6. year of completion

7. condition of structure (good – 1, satisfactory – 2, bad – 3)

8.

drainage system

( underground – 1, covered pucca – 2, open pucca – 3, open katcha – 4,

no drainage – 5)

9.

disposal of household waste water (safe re-use after treatment-1,disposed

off without treatment to: open low land areas-2, ponds-3,nearby river-4,

drainage system-5; disposed off with or without treatment to other places-

9, not known-6)

10.

arrangement made for collection of garbage from the household

(by panchayet/municipality /corporation – 1, by resident/group of

residents – 2, others – 9, no arrangement – 3)

11.

site where garbage is deposited after removal from the household

(to bio-gas plant or manure pit-1, to community dumping spot-2, to

household’s individual dumping spot(s)-3, others-9, not known-4)

12.

if code 2 in item 11, how frequently garbage is cleared

(daily-1, not daily but at least once in a week-2, not even once in a week-

3, not known-4)

13.

animal shed

and poultry

farm

13.1

existence of animal shed/poultry farm (attached to

the house– 1, detached from the house – 2, no

animal shed/poultry farm – 3)

202

13.2

if code 1 or 2 in item 13.1, disposal of

animal/poultry excreta (to bio-gas plant-1,

manure pit-2, used as fuel-3, others-9, not

known-4)

14.

whether experienced any flood during last 5 years?

(yes: from excessive rain during monsoon – 1, from river, sea, etc. – 2;

no – 3)

15.

approach road / lane / constructed path

(direct opening to: motorable road / lane / constructed path with street

light – 1, motorable road / lane / constructed path without street light – 2,

other road / lane / constructed path with street light – 3, other road / lane

/ constructed path without street light – 4; no direct opening to road / lane

/ constructed path – 5)

Note: for items relating to ‘house’, information will be collected for the whole ‘structure’ in which the

dwelling unit is located.

203

[6] particulars of the dwelling (for the households living in houses, i.e., with codes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or

9 in item 14 of block 3)

srl.

no.

item code /

entry

(1) (2) (3)

1. type of the dwelling (independent house – 1, flat – 2, others – 9)

2.

number of rooms in the dwelling

living rooms

3. other rooms

4.

floor area of the dwelling

(in square feet and

in whole numbers)

living rooms

5. other rooms

6. covered veranda

7. uncovered veranda

8. total (sum of items 4 to 7)

9. ventilation of the dwelling unit (good – 1, satisfactory – 2, bad – 3)

10. total number of married couples in the household

11. if entry>0 in item 10, number of married couples having separate room

12. kitchen type

(separate kitchen: with water tap – 1, without water tap – 2; no separate kitchen – 3)

13. floor type

(mud – 1, bamboo / log – 2, wood / plank – 3, brick / lime stone / stone – 4, cement

– 5, mosaic / tiles – 6, others – 9)

14. wall type

(grass/ straw/ leaves/ reeds/ bamboo, etc. – l, mud (with / without bamboo) / unburnt

brick – 2, canvas / cloth – 3, other katcha – 4, timber – 5, burnt brick / stone / lime

stone – 6, iron or other metal sheet – 7, cement / RBC / RCC – 8, other pucca – 9)

15. roof type

(grass/ straw/ leaves/ reeds/ bamboo etc. – 1, mud / unburnt brick – 2, canvas / cloth

– 3, other katcha – 4, tiles / slate – 5, burnt brick / stone / lime stone – 6, iron / zinc

/other metal sheet / asbestos sheet – 7, cement / RBC / RCC – 8, other pucca – 9)

16. if hired

(i.e., if code 3, 4 or 5 in item 14 of

bl. 3)

monthly rent (`)

(payable approach)

204

[7] some general particulars of the households living in houses, i.e., with codes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 9 in item 14 of

block 3

srl.

no.

item code / entry

(1) (2) (3)

A. for all households

1. duration of stay in the present area* (years)

2. whether the household moved to the present area during last 365 days (yes-1, no-2)

3.

if 1 in item 2,

where the household was residing before coming to the present area?

(in slum/squatter settlement of the same town – 1, in other areas of the same town

-2, in slum/squatter settlement of other town – 3, in other areas of other town-4,

village – 5)

4. type of structure of the accommodation availed of immediately before coming to

the present area

(pucca – 1, semi -pucca – 2, katcha – 3, no dwelling – 4)

5. reason for movement to the present area

(free / low rent – 1, independent accommodation – 2, accommodation in better

locality-3,employment related reasons: proximity to place of work – 4, other

employment related reasons-5; others – 9)

6. number of members who moved into the household during the last 365 days

7. number of members who moved out of the household during the last 365 days

B. for households living in slums/squatter settlements (for urban only)

(dwellings of area type code 1, 2 or 3 in item 15, block 3)

8. does the head of the household possess any of the documents pertaining to the residence status

in the slum/squatter settlement?

(possesses: ration card – 1, voter ID card – 2, passport – 3,

any combination of codes 1 to 3 – 4, other – 9; none – 5)

9. whether the household received any benefit as a slum/squatter settlement dweller

(received allotment of land / tenement – 1, received other benefits – 9;

received no benefit – 2)

10. whether the household tried to move out of the slum/squatter settlement

(yes – 1, no – 2)

11. if code 1 in item 10, main reason

(better accommodation - 1, proximity to place of work - 2,

social / religious factors – 3, others – 9)

*: The present area is the area in which the household is being enumerated and is identified by the area types as

recorded in item 15 of block 3, viz., notified slum, non-notified slum, squatter settlement and other areas. Other areas’

will mean a village in rural sector and for urban sector, the areas in the town other than notified slum, non-notified slum

or squatter settlement. Thus present area means present village or present slum or present squatter settlement

or other areas of the town.

205

[2] particulars of field operations

srl. no. item field investigator (FI)

/assistant

superintending officer

(ASO)

field officer (FO)/

superintending officer

(SO)

(1) (2) (3) (4)

1 (a)

i) name (block letters)

ii) employee code

iii) signature

1 (b)

i) name (block letters)

ii) employee code

iii) signature

2. date(s) of : DD MM YY DD MM YY

(i) survey/ inspection

(ii) receipt

(iii) scrutiny

(iv) despatch

3. total time taken to canvass the

schedule by the team of

investigators (FI/ASO)

(in minutes)

4. number of investigators (FI/ASO) in

the team

5. whether any

remarks have been

entered by FI/ASO/

supervisory officer

(yes –1, no-2)

(i) in block 8/

9

(ii) elsewhere

in the

schedule

206

[8] remarks by investigators (FI/ASO)

[9] Comments by supervisory officer(s)

PREPARED BY NSS DIVISION

DES, ODISHA

Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing Condition ... · 365 days, (ii) that effort was made by local bodies/state government/households during last 365 days to tackle problem

Documents