7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
1/41
1
PETE 411Well Dri l l ing
Lesson 4
Dri ll ing Cos t & Dri ll ing Rate
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
2/41
2
Contents
The AFE
Drilling Cost and Bit Change
Factors Affecting Drilling Rate Bit Weight, Rotary Speed
Bottom-hole Cleaning
Mud Properties, Solids Content Hydrostatics
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
3/41
3
HW #2. ADE 1.12, 1.13, 1.14Due Friday, Sept. 13, 2002
Read: ADE, Ch. 1 (All)
Learn:Rig Components - Definitions
Ass ignments
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
4/41
4
Before gett ing app roval to d r i l l a wel l the
Dri ll ing Engineer mus t prepare an AFE
- a detai led cost est imate for the wel l
DRY COMPLETED
HOLE
INTANGIBLE COSTS $ $
TANGIBLE COSTS $ $
TOTAL COST $ $
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
5/41
5
AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE (AFE)
EXPENDITURE DRY HOLE COMPLETED(24.5 DAYS) (32.5 DAYS)
INTANGIBLE COSTSLOCATION PREPARATION 30,000 65,000DRILLING RIG AND TOOLS 298,185 366,613DRILLING FLUIDS 113,543 116,976RENTAL EQUIPMENT 77,896 133,785CEMENTING 49,535 54,369
SUPPORT SERVICES 152,285 275,648TRANSPORTATION 70,200 83,400SUPERVISION AND ADMIN. 23,282 30,791
SUB-TOTAL 814,928 1,126,581
TANGIBLE COSTS
TUBULAR EQUIPMENT 406,101 846,529WELL HEAD EQUIPMENT 16,864 156,201COMPLETION EQUIPMENT 0 15,717
SUB-TOTAL 422,965 1,018,447
SUB-TOTAL 1,237,893 2,145,028
+ CONTINGENCY (15% ??) 1,423,577 2,466,782
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
6/41
6
Dril ling Cost vs . Time
DEPTHft
DAYS or DOLLARS
TD
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
7/41
7
Dril ling Cost Analys is
The Drilling Engineer:
Recommends drilling procedures that
will safely drill and complete the wellat the lowest cost possible
Makes recommendations concerningroutine rig operations:
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
8/41
8
The Dri l l ing Eng ineer
Examplesof routine rig operations
drilling fluid treatment
pump operation
bit selection
handling problems during thedrilling process
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
9/41
9
The Dri l l ing Cos t Equat ion :
Cf= drilling cost, $/ftCb= cost of bit, $/bit
Cr= fixed operating cost of rig, $/hr
tb = total rotating time, hrs
tc = total non-rotating time, hrs
tt = total trip time(round trip), hrs
D
ft$
D)ttt(CCCtcbrb
f
Eq. 1.16
= footage drilledwith bit, ft/bit
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
10/41
10
Example 1.5
A recommended bit program is being prepared fora new well using bit performance records fromnearby wells.
Drilling performance records for three bits areshown for a thick limestone formation at 9,000 ft.
Determine which bit gives the lowest drilling cost ifthe operating cost of the rig is $400/hr, the trip timeis 7 hours, and connection time is 1 minute perconnection.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
11/41
11
Assume that each of the bits was operated atnear the minimum cost per foot attainable forthat bit.
Mean
Bit Rotating Connection PenetrationCost Time Time RateBit ($) (hours) (hours) (ft/hr)
A 800 14.8 0.1 13.8
B 4,900 57.7 0.4 12.6C 4,500 95.8 0.5 10.2
Example 1.5 contd
Which bit would you select?
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
12/41
12
Solut ion:
The cost per foot drilled for each bit typecan be computed using Eq. 1.16. For Bit
A, the cost per foot is
/ft.81.46$)8.14(8.13
)71.08.14(400800Cf
ft
$
D
)ttt(CCC
tcbrbf
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
13/41
13
Solut ion:
Similarly, for Bit B,
/ft.56.42$)7.57(6.12
)74.07.57(400900,4Cf
ft$
D)ttt(CCC tcbrbf
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
14/41
14
Solution, contd
Finally, for Bit C,
/ft.89.46$)8.95(2.10
)75.08.95(400500,4Cf
ft$
D)ttt(CCC tcbrbf
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
15/41
15
Solution, contd
Bit A: $46.81 /ft
Bit B: $42.56 /ft
Bit C: $46.89 /ft
The lowest drilling cost was obtained
using Bit B. - Highest bit cost but -intermediate bit life and ROP...
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
16/41
16
Dril ling Costs
Tend to increase exponentially withdepth. Thus, when curve-fitting drilling
cost data, it is often convenient toassume a relationship between totalwell cost, C, and depth, D, given by
C= aebD ..(1.17)
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
17/41
17
Drilling Costs, contd
Constants aand b depend primarily on thewell location.
Shown on the next page is a least-squares
curve fit of the south Louisiana completedwell data given in Table 1.7.
Depth range of 7,500 ft to 21,000 ft.
For these data,a =1 X 105 dollars
b =2 X 10-4 ft -1.
C= aebD
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
18/41
18
Fig. 1-65. Least-square curve fit of 1978 completed wellcosts for wells below 7,500 ft in the south Louisiana area.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
19/41
19
Penetration Rate
When major variations are not present inthe subsurface lithology, the penetrationrate usually decreases exponentially with
depth. Under these conditions, thepenetration rate can be related to depth,D, by
where K anda2
are constants.
)18.1,........(Kedt
dD Da303.2 2
WHY?
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
20/41
20
Dri ll ing Time
The drilling time,td, required to drill to agiven depth can be obtained by separating
variables and integrating. Separatingvariables gives
dDedtKDa303.2D
0
t
0
2d
Integrating and solving fortdyields
)19.1.....().........1e(Ka303.2
1t Da303.2
2
d2
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
21/41
21
Drilling Time contd
Plotting depth vs. drilling time from pastdrilling operations:
A. Allows more accurate prediction of time andcost for drilling a new well
B. Is used in evaluating new drilling
procedures (designed to reduce drillingtime to a given depth).
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
22/41
22
EXAMPLE - Cos t per ft
t R D Total Cost Cfhr fph ft $ $/ft
5 90 475 36,950 77.80
10 80 900 47,800 53.1020 60 1,600 69,200 43.3025 50 1,875 79,750 42.5030 40 2,100 90,200 43.0035 30 2,275 100,550 44.2040 20 2,400 110,800 46.20
These cost data are plotted below.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
23/41
23
Cost per f t for one ent i re bi t run
Minimum Cost
80
70
60
50
40
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
24/41
24
Econom ic Procedu re in above Table
Can pull bit after about 25 hr. ($42.50/ft)
- the precise pulling time is not critical
Note that the cost in dollars per footwas $43.00 after30 hr.
Primarily applicable to tooth-type bitswhere wear rate is predictable.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
25/41
25
Econom ic Procedu re in above Table
Also used with tungsten carbide insertbits when inserts are broken orpulled out of the matrix.
Unfortunately, wear rate with insertbits is unpredictable.
Economically, the insert bit should bepulled when the cost in $/ft begins toincrease.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
26/41
26
Econom ic Procedu re in Table
Bits pulled for economic reasons makeit hard to obtain wear information.
Operator might pull bit after120 hrofuse but part of bit might get left inhole. Recovery is very difficult. Avoid!
75% of rock bits are pulled green orbefore the bit is worn out.
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
27/41
27
An increase in
TORQUE mayindicate that a bitshould be pulled.
Experience oftendictates when to
pull bit (footage orhours).
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
28/41
28
Fac to rs that affec t Penetrat ion Rate
Type of Drill bit
Bit weight
Rotary speed
Bottom-hole cleaning
Mud properties
Rock hardness
Formation pore pressure
Variables:
Fixed Factors:
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
29/41
29
B it Select ion is based on
Past bit records
Geologic predictions of lithology
Drilling costs in $/bit...
Drilling cost in $/ft
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
30/41
30
B it Weigh t and Ro tary Speed
Increasing bit weight and rotary speedboosts drilling rate
These increases accelerate bit wear
Field tests show that drilling rateincreases more or less in directproportion to bit weight
40 000 lbf
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
31/41
31
Consider 10 hole
(dont overdo!!)
Bit Weight x 1,000 lb/in
40,000 lbf
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
32/41
32Rotary Speed, RPM
Dont overdo!Casing wear,
bit life ...
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
33/41
33
EFFECT OF BACK PRESSUREKeep P_bit = const.= 550 psi
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
34/41
34Hydrostatic Pressure, 1,000s of psi
EFFECT OF BACK PRESSURE0 - 5,000 psi
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
35/41
35Drilling Time, days
Drilled with gas
Drilled with mud
EFFECT OF DRILLING FLUIDmud vs. gas
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
36/41
36Rotating Time, hours
EFFECT OF DRILLING FLUIDwater vs. air
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
37/41
37Old style water course bits
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
38/41
38
EFFECT OF SOLIDS IN THE MUD
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
39/41
39
Hydrostat ic Pressu re Grad ient
Fresh Water Pressure Gradient = 0.433 psi/ftDensity of Fresh Water = 8.33 lb/gal
Hydrostatic Pressure (at 12,000 ft depth):
with water: p = Gw
* Depth (vertical depth)
= 0.433 psi/ft * 12,000 ft
= 5,196 psi
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
40/41
40
Hydrostat ic Pressure
with 14 lb/gal mud: p = GM * Depth
Depth*psi/ft433.0*8.33
Mud
Depth*WeightMud*0.052Pressure
= 0.052 *14.0 *12,000
= 8,736 psig
(5,196 psi with water)
7/27/2019 DrillCostRate-1
41/41
41
Hydrostat ic Pressure Requ ired
Depth*0.052
PressureWeightMudRequired
What mud weight is required tobalance a pore pressure of 10,000 psigat a vertical depth of 12,000 ft?
12,000*0.05210,000WeightMudRequired
MW = 16.03 lb/gal