Dreams Are What Le Cinema Is For: Games - 1967

GAMES 1967lecinemadreams.blogspot.com/2013/01/games-1967.html

Sometimes being a movie star just means having enough “brand name recognition” to bring to each movie a kind ofdistinct, firmly established name-association (a personality cachet, if you will) fully-formed and locked in place from aprevious film. For example: to a large segment of the population Mia Farrow was and always will be Rosemary Woodhouse ofRosemary’s Baby. The films See No Evil (1971), The Haunting of Julia (1977) and the 2006 remake of The Omenall banked on the public associating Farrow with the macabre and horrific. None perhaps so blatantly or swiftly asJoseph Losey’s difficult-to-market 1968 psychological thriller Secret Ceremony, which was released only fourmonths after Rosemary’s Baby opened. Although the film starred Hollywood heavyweights Elizabeth Taylor andRobert Mitchum in their only screen pairing, ads emphasized what was then the film’s one sure-fire property: Mia Farrow - “More haunted than in Rosemary’s Baby!” the posters screamed.

Satan Place Occult rituals are just one of many perverse diversions in Games

After the success of Halloween (1978) critics began hailing director John Carpenter as a worthy successor to AlfredHitchcock. Hoping to further encourage such comparisons, Carpenter cast perennially Hitchcock-associated actressJanet Leigh in a thoroughly arbitrary role in his 1980 film The Fog. Janet Leigh, who should be commended for nothaving turned the entirety of her latter years into one long series of stunt-casting parts cashing in on her iconicPsycho role, did allow her image to be exploited just one more time - in the 1998 Halloween sequel, Halloween H20:20 Years Later (check out IMDB’s Trivia section for details) although it must be said these nothing roles at leastafforded her the opportunity to appear onscreen with real-life daughter Jamie Lee Curtis.

1/6

DesensitizationA well-appointed game room features violent Roy Lichtenstein pop-art and a

pinball machine that awards points for driving fatalities

In 1968, if American audiences knew much about French film star Simone Signoret at all (and they didn't) it was onthe strength of three films: her Oscar- winning role in Room at the Top (1959); her Oscar-nominated turn in StanleyKramer’s prestige flop, Ship of Fools; and… most popularly and most likely, the highly acclaimed and influentialthriller Diabolique (1955). Internet sources maintain that the starring role of Lisa Schindler, the mysterious visitor inGames, was originally written for Marlene Dietrich, and when producers balked, the role was offered to JeanneMoreau, who also declined. All of which may well be true. But after looking at this clever thriller full of twists andmysterious turns, the overwhelming evidence leans towards my belief that Games was conceived and writtenexpressly to capitalize on and exploit the American public’s familiarity with Signoret’s starring role in Clouzot’sbloodcurdling French chiller.

Simone Signoret as Lisa Schindler

Katharine Ross as Jennifer Montgomery

2/6

James Caan as Paul Montgomery

Like most good thrillers, the premise of Games is marvelously simple. A well-to-do but eccentric young couple wholike to engage in elaborate games and practical jokes (Caan and Ross) meets their match when a mysteriousFrench stranger (guess who) enters their lives. The couple, both blasé dilettantes dabbling in chic nihilism, prove nomatch for the genuine article.

Brando-ish 70's TV stalwart, Don Stroud (who five years later would appear as anude centerfold in Playgirl magazine) plays Norman, the oversexed box boy.

Another player in Games

WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILMCompensating perhaps for all those years of hyperactivity in my youth, I’ve discovered of late that I’m remarkablyadroit at being sedentary. It's a revelation to me that in my dotage I find I no longer go in search of thrills, but preferinstead for my thrills come to me. Ill-disposed as I am to amusement park rides, fast cars, or any activity calling forthe deployment of adrenaline, I have become a huge fan of armchair adventure. I love mysteries, suspense thrillers,horror films (horror as in dread, not gore) and movie plotting that stays one step ahead of me. Even when a film hasplot twists which can be figured out if one really puts their mind to it (as some claim to be the case with Games), I soenjoy the big “reveal” in these kinds of movies that I've learned over the years how not to spoil my own fun. I employa subtle form of self-hypnosis, allow the plot to unfold before me and just let myself surrender to the director’s pace,trying not to put the pieces of the puzzle together unless the film leads me there first.

3/6

Identity and Illusion

Games is almost theatrical in its construct, as it’s sparsely populated (four principal characters) and takes placeprimarily in a single location (the tony townhouse of Paul and Jennifer Montgomery). Tension is derived from theuneasiness of having a cast of characters, none of whom we’re told very much about but all overtly fond of playingmind-games, interacting in both real and contrived situations. As it becomes increasingly difficult to ascertainwhether a game has begun, ended, or is underway, it soon dawns that the film itself is but another of the games.One that we in the audience (like several of the characters in the movie) weren't aware we were playing.

PERFORMANCESRegrettably, for all the fun to be had in watching Games (like the 1972 film adaptation of Anthony Schaeffer’s Sleuth,its pleasures don’t diminish even after its surprises are revealed) I can’t say it’s a film one is likely to remember forthe performances. In just a few short years the producers of Games probably wouldn't have been able to affordeither Katharine Ross or James Caan, but at this point in their young careers the future superstars are shown visiblytrying to find their footing in this stylish thriller. Though falling short of making me really feel for the plight of thecaracters, I've no real complaint with the beautiful Katharine Ross who is always an appealingly natural presenceand is, I think, actually better here than she is in The Graduate. She definitely comes off much better than Caan,who seems a tad stiff trying to play an urbane sophisticate who's still a little rough around the edges.

Simone Signoret claimed responsibility for bringing Katharine Ross to theattention of director Mike Nichols when he was casting The Graduate

The ever-watchable Simone Signoret has had many finer moments on the screen and has certainly beenphotographed to better advantage than she is here, but for me, she is a dynamic screen presence and gives the filmthe garvitas it most certainly needs. Acting-wise, little is demanded of her save to appear mysterious and give off anair of European ambiguity in the face of Yankee frankness; but she's one of those less-is-more actressess who don'trequire showy display. She's fine as she is merely exuding style and a kind of debauched regalness.

4/6

Something Wicked This Way Comes?Oddly unsettling artwork (Roy Lichtenstein?) dominates this shot and adds a

sense of apprehension and danger to the scene

THE STUFF OF FANTASYPaul and Jennifer Montgomery are the idle wealthy. A little too much money and too much time on their handsextends to their eccentric collection of modern art. The pieces, whimsical and absurd works displayed throughouttheir spacious New York townhouse, create the effect that we are watching events play out on an oversized gameboard or inside a pinball machine.

5/6

THE STUFF OF DREAMSThe first time I saw Games was when it aired on NBC-TV back in the early '70s. I recall I'd found it to be very muchthe unsettling suspenser, keeping me on the edge of my seat as the swift turns of plot not only taking me by surprisebut scaring the hell out of me. No longer a kid and revisiting it on DVD some 30 years later, I was prepared for it tobe a nice, tame nostalgia trip with maybe the distraction of camp taking the place of the suspense.Not the case. The years may have shaved a little of the originality off its plot, but the effectiveness of the film itself -the sustaining of mood, the building of suspense, the unforeseen twists - it all worked for me just as persuasively aswhen I first saw it in my youth. In fact, much of the film played better in some instances; particularly in my takingnote of all the foreshadowing in events, and the allusions made to the articficiality and contrivance of pop-culture, pop-art,and pop-amorality.

Although the term hipster didn't exist in 1967 in the context it's used today,James Caan and Katharine Ross play a 60s version of just the kind of

obnoxiously trendy urban couple you might find yourself rooting for somethingbad to happen to.

Games is no classic, and to some it will look a great deal like a well-made '70s TV movie. But as suspense thrillersgo (and when was the last time a good one of those appeared on the horizon?), I have to say, flaws and all, Gamescomes out looking like a winner.

Copyright © Ken Anderson

6/6