Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016 1 How Does The Immune System Do It? Inflamma;on and Innate Immunity Amelia R. Woolums, DVM MVSc PhD DACVIM DACVM Department of Pathobiology and Popula;on Medicine, Mississippi State University [email protected]
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
1
How Does The Immune System Do It? Inflamma;on and Innate Immunity
Amelia R. Woolums, DVM MVSc PhD DACVIM DACVM Department of Pathobiology and Popula;on Medicine, Mississippi State University
These cells can also be called into regions of inflammation
Dendri;c Cells
• Present in most ;ssues • Have 3 major func;ons:
– Survey ;ssues for PAMPs and DAMPs
– Present an;gen to T cells and B cells • The only APC that can ac;vate naïve TC
– Influence the type of immune response that occurs in response to PAMPs or DAMPs
• TH1, TH2, TH17, or T regulatory (Treg)
– More in the next hour
Macrophages
• Iden;fy and kill pathogens via many PRRs and other surface receptors – phagocytosis – secrete an;microbial products
• Produce proinflammatory cytokines – IL-1, TNF-α, and IL-6
– ac;vate inflamma;on • kick off the immune response
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
6
• Given s;muli that lead to “classical ac;va;on”, macrophages become M1 macrophages – Phagocytosis – Microbial killing – Proinflammatory cytokine produc;on
• Given s;muli that lead to “alterna;ve ac;va;on”, macrophages become M2 macrophages – Suppression of inflamma;on – Promo;on of blood vessel forma;on – Promo;on of ;ssue remodeling and repair
“Accumulated evidence indicates that macrophages are func;onally plas;c cells with the poten;al to alter their ac;vi;es progressively and reversibly in response to changes in the ;ssue environment.” Sang et al., 2011
Mast Cells • Originate from myeloid precursors in bone
marrow
• Migrate to ;ssues
– Mucosal mast cells: under mucosal surfaces
– Connec;ve ;ssue mast cells: in skin, peritoneal cavity
• Granules contain enzymes and vasoac;ve mediators
• Degranulate when surface IgE molecules cross-‐linked an;gen binding
– Key mediator of allergy and anaphylaxis
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
7
• It is now recognized that mast cells can respond to PAMPs and DAMPs via PRRs – Help ini;ate early inflammatory response to many s;muli
– Granules are released “piecemeal” • Provides a more ;trated response than when an;gen binds surface IgE
Pathogen recogni;on receptors (PRR)
• Sen;nel cells ac;vate the inflammatory/immune response when their PRR bind PAMPs or DAMPs
• PRR are found – On cell surface – Inside endosomes inside the cell – In cell cytoplasm
Sites where cellular pathogen recogni&on receptors (PRR) can bind to PAMPs or
DAMPs
Sentinel cell
TLR-‐6 TLR-‐2
TLR-‐5 TLR-‐4
TLR-‐2 TLR-‐1 On the cell surface
TLR-‐3
TLR-‐9
TLR-‐7
Within endosomes inside of cell
Within the cytoplasm NLR
RIG-‐I MDA5
CLR
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
8
• Binding of PRR by a PAMP or DAMP ini;ates a signal transduc;on sequence in the cell
• This will cause the cell to produce cytokines that will in turn ac;vate the inflammatory/immune response
• The mixture of cytokines produced will determine the kind of immune response ac;vated
LPS
MYD88
TLR-‐4
MKK IRAK
TRIF
MAPK NF-‐κB IRF3
TNF-‐α
IL-‐1β
IL-‐6 IFN-‐β
Consequences of PAMP binding to PRR Example: LPS binding to TLR-‐4
Lipopoly
saccharid
e
(LPS)
TLR-‐4
Macrophage
A. Woolums
• Consequence of TLR binding by PAMP – Initiation of signal transduction sequence – Expression of genes for
• cytokines • other antimicrobial molecules
• Different TLRs trigger different combinations of gene expression – Response appropriate for defense against the
initiating microbe
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
9
Cytokines
• All cells influence other cells by release of cytokines • Cytokines...
– Ac;vate the immune response
– Direct specific types of responses • An;-‐viral, an;-‐bacterial, an;-‐parasi;c
– Contribute to inflamma;on and some;mes death • “Sep;c shock”
So…why does this matter??
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
10
M. haemolytica CD18/CD11a (LFA 1) leukotoxin
proteases
elastases
reactive O2
tissue necrosis
TLR-4 + CD 14
LPS
TNF-α, IL-1β endothelial cell
activation,
leaky blood vessels
edema,
hemorrhage,
thrombosis
Fibrinous, necrotizing bronchopneumonia
neutrophils
macrophage
Other Players in the Innate Immune Response
Innate immunity, soluble factors
• Defensins and cathelicidins – kill or inac;vate bacteria, fungi, enveloped viruses
• Lysozyme – degrades pep;doglycan
• Lec;ns – bind microbial carbohydrates (e.g., to opsonize)
• Iron-‐binding proteins • Complement
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
11
• Soluble factors are not only an;microbial
• Some also ac;vate immune cells – act as “natural adjuvants”
– a cathelicidin included in an experimental vaccine improved immune responses in caYle
Kovacs-‐Nolan et al., 2009
Innate immunity, cells
• Granulocytes: immediate responders • Neutrophils: any infec;on or injury • Eosinophils: parasites and hypersensi;vity • Basophils: func;ons not well characterized
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
12
Neutrophils
• “First responders” – Among the first immune cells to come to site of infec;on
• Mediate an;-‐pathogen defense in many ways – Engulf (phagocytose) and destroy pathogens with
• reac;ve oxygen species (ROS) via the respiratory burst • proteoly;c enzymes
• an;microbial pep;des
Natural killer cells
• Major mediator of innate anti-viral defense
• Large, granular, nonphagocytic lymphocytes
• Respond to balance of inhibitory and activating signals on target cells
– MHC I on healthy cell: inhibitory signal transmitted
– Lack of MHC I: activating signal
Dr. Amelia Woolums, Mississippi State University ISVMA Annual Conven;on, November 2016
13
Tizard, 2009
natural killer cell
virus-‐infected cell, before killing
virus-‐infected cell, aeer killing
natural killer cell
• NK cells kill target cells by
– Releasing perforin • forms pores in target cell membrane, then
– Releasing granzymes from cytotoxic granules • enter target cell through perforin pores