Top Banner
Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011
35

Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Irea Guthrie
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges

Meghan MitmanFehr & Peers

August 15, 2011

Page 2: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Background

Page 3: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Goals

Page 4: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Where does the Freeway end?

Page 5: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Leaving the Freeway, Entering a Neighborhood

Page 6: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Guiding Principles

Page 7: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

On-Ramps

Page 8: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Dashed bike lane begins before on ramp lane; optional exit ramp

Dashed bike lane begins before on ramp lane; optional exit ramp Directional curb ramps

with truncated domes, high visibility striping provided for all crosswalks

Directional curb ramps with truncated domes, high visibility striping provided for all crosswalks

Landscape buffer provided between sidewalk and bike lanes, including on the structure as feasible

Landscape buffer provided between sidewalk and bike lanes, including on the structure as feasible

Crosswalk located in location with lowest speed and highest visibility

Crosswalk located in location with lowest speed and highest visibility

Ramp geometrics minimize speed for vehicles leaving the arterial

Ramp geometrics minimize speed for vehicles leaving the arterial

Page 9: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

HOV Lane added downstream of crosswalk

HOV Lane added downstream of crosswalk

Page 10: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Bike weaving zone provided through long on-ramp

Bike weaving zone provided through long on-ramp

Page 11: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Advance yield limit line provided on dual lane crossing (advance stop bar if signalized). Bicyclists have option to use crosswalk (with ramps).

Advance yield limit line provided on dual lane crossing (advance stop bar if signalized). Bicyclists have option to use crosswalk (with ramps).

Raised (landscaped) buffer provided between bike lane and on-ramp lanes

Raised (landscaped) buffer provided between bike lane and on-ramp lanes

Page 12: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Off -Ramps

Page 13: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Ramp geometrics minimize speed for vehicles leaving the freeway. Ramp is stop controlled.

Ramp geometrics minimize speed for vehicles leaving the freeway. Ramp is stop controlled.

Page 14: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.
Page 15: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Optional bicycle exit ramp

Optional bicycle exit ramp

Page 16: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Bike lane crossing - detail

Page 17: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

In this configuration, ramps should be signalized. Bicycle detection and optional ramps accommodate bikes at the crosswalk.

In this configuration, ramps should be signalized. Bicycle detection and optional ramps accommodate bikes at the crosswalk.

Page 18: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Advance yield limit line is provided across dual lane ramp. Advance stop bar if signalized.

Advance yield limit line is provided across dual lane ramp. Advance stop bar if signalized.

Page 19: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

SPUIs

Page 20: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Source: FHWA 17-20

Solution: Two-step crossing (one step during vehicle phase 2 and the other Solution: Two-step crossing (one step during vehicle phase 2 and the other during vehicle phase 3)during vehicle phase 3)

Possible ped crosswalksVehicle phase 1Vehicle phase 2Vehicle phase 3

With most SPUIs there is never a phase when pedestrians can cross the urban With most SPUIs there is never a phase when pedestrians can cross the urban arterial without conflictarterial without conflict

Page 21: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Each stage is coordinated with the downstream signal in the same direction

Each stage is coordinated with the downstream signal in the same direction

Page 22: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Source: FHWA 17-22

Possible ped crosswalksVehicle phase 1Vehicle phase 2Vehicle phase 3

Peds with vehicle phase 2

Peds with vehicle phase 3

Page 23: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Skip Striping throughComplex Intersections

Page 24: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Advance crosswalk controlled with a signal or HAWK beacon

Advance crosswalk controlled with a signal or HAWK beacon

Page 25: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Determining Crosswalk Treatments

Page 26: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.
Page 27: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Note: Spreadsheet should supplement engineering judgment and should be used in conjunction with treatment fact sheets per NCHRP Report 562. Credit: Fehr & Peers, April 2008. Version 1.02

Page 28: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Thank You!

Meghan Mitman

415-384-0300

[email protected]

Page 29: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Design Assumptions

Page 30: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

High Speeds, Poor Visibility

Page 31: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Prefer Slow Speed, Right Angle Urban Designs

Page 32: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Source: FHWA 17-32

Flat angle = wide crossing & high-speed turns

Tight angle = short crossing & slow speed turnsSpringfield ORSpringfield OR

Old ramp alignmentOld ramp alignment

Positive example: reconfigured ramp terminusPositive example: reconfigured ramp terminus

Page 33: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Source: FHWA 17-33

Red line = old crosswalkRed line = old crosswalk Green line = new crosswalkGreen line = new crosswalk

Springfield OR

Page 34: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

Savings in Land Area, Less Ped “Dead Zone”

Page 35: Draft Design Guidelines to Accommodate Peds and Bikes at Interchanges Meghan Mitman Fehr & Peers August 15, 2011.

What you don’t see in this presentation…Right turn lane adjacent to shared right-thru