A Policy Approach to embedding rights in Mental Health Services: A Vision for Change and the experience in Ireland Irish Mental Health Coalition Conference, Dublin May 18 th 2009 Mary Keys, School of Law, NUI Galway
Dec 05, 2014
A Policy Approach to embedding rights in Mental Health Services: A Vision for Change and the experience in Ireland
Irish Mental Health Coalition Conference, Dublin
May 18th 2009Mary Keys, School of Law, NUI Galway
Introduction Brief on Vision for Change Implementing Vision for Change The impact of current practices Is legal action realistic? Some possible explanations The future Conclusions
Real Life Dave, aged 64 years, spent a number of
years in a psychiatric hospital. Discharged to a medium support hostel, his
home for a number of years Attended a day centre each day, paid rent
from his DA Difficulty with using the stairs -nursing
home was proposed Now lives in a nursing home and complains
that he has no-one to talk to as many of the residents have communication difficulties
Vision for Change 20061
Framework for complete model of mental health service provision
Principle based and respect human rights Holistic approach to mental health problems Person centred approach based on
Recovery ethos to inform every aspect of delivery
Service user as partner in own care plan- to reflect needs, goals and potential
Vision for Change2
Service user involvement the norm in every aspect of service development and delivery- similarly with carers
Integrated multi-disciplinary approach to factors that contribute to mental health problems
Specialist community mental health teams to address needs across life span
Effective community service
Vision for Change3
Managed by a National Directorate-working directly within the HSE
Locally by Mental Health Catchment Area Management Teams
Service provision to be prioritised on needs basis
Services should be meaningfully evaluated
Closure of all psychiatric hospitals
Implementation-who’s watching? Independent Monitoring Group 1
Vision cannot be implemented effectively without a National Mental Health Services Directorate
Has impeded progress on poor facilities Inconsistent approach to embedding Recovery
ethos in services Absence of comprehensive implementation plan
Progress made on some priorities, child and adolescents, engagement with service users, 2009 Report- www.doh&c.ie
Implementation-Who’s watching? 2
Inspector of Mental Health Services
Lumping all mhs tog. in PCCC + no Mental Health Directorate “caused confusion, misunderstanding, muddied mission, poor decisional capacity” Broad Impact –people admitted to
institutions No progress in resource equalisation Lacking comprehensive community
services Impact of restrictive work practices
Implementation-Who’s watching?3 Irish Mental Health Coalition
“Late for a Very Important Date” progress painfully slow No Mental Health Directorate Children in Adult wards HSE Implementation plan with lack of detailed
commitments-finance, resources HSE should publish quarterly reports of progress for the
Implementation Group The number of fully staffed Community Mental Health Teams
are limited and not clear Government commitment to ring fencing existing mental
health funding
Real Life Community in the Gaeltacht presented a purpose built
house to the HSE for sole use of the mental health service (proposed in 2001)
Five service users, local Irish speakers selected-no comprehensive rehabilitation process
House furnished by HSE and ready for occupation in 2005
One person lives in a high support hostel, the other people remain in institutional care where between them they have spent many years of their lives
The house remains unused… How is policy assisting their recovery and life
potential?
Issues arising Offer by an Independent sector to
manage the service What are the expectations? Greater cost than the HSE original cost? At least a good solid knowledge of
current mental health policy? At least a good solid knowledge of what
the Recovery Ethos means?
Impact Mental Health Act 2008-Dail Debate-
Minister Harney “unthinkable” that anyone would lose his/her liberty because of a lack of supported accommodation
Has Dave lost his liberty, other five people? Informed consent-is it a robust approach? Does it include information on choices and
possible disempowerment? That his place in the supported accommodation
will be gone?
Re-institutionalisation? What are Dave’s options? He is re-institutionalised in a generic
service designed for some older people Principles and values applying in
mental health policy are lost to him He is in a service that is not focused on
his needs What about his human rights, his
everyday life activities, his Recovery?
Principles and Capacity Least restrictive alternative Dignity and respect Capacity means: (Proposed Scheme of Mental
Capacity Bill) the ability to understand the nature
and consequences of a decision in the context of available choices at the time the decision is to be made
Best interests- (Proposed Scheme of Mental Capacity Bill)
Applies when person is unable to decide Person focused
Is legal action an option?
Olmstead v. Zimring 527 US (1999) Costs of segregated institutional
environment vs appropriate community-based care
R v. Nth & East Devon HA ex p Coughlan (2000) 3 AER 850 Person had a been assured of a home for
life-she had a legitimate expectation- the decision to close her community residence for financial reasons was unlawful
Is legal action an option?
Courts are reluctant to get involved in directing how the public purse is spent
Rarely make mandatory orders-directing the government (HSE) to do something
If there are enforceable rights or specific agreements have been made and reneged on may make order then
Why is this happening?
Key issue- Political Motivation No director for mental health at top
level of HSE where key decisions are made
Unstable, fragmented and inappropriate structures in HSE
Local level very important but unless principles and values are recognised…
Bird’s Eye View
Are we witnessing the new generation of human rights abuses? Moving people with mental health
problems to nursing homes, or Keeping them in institutions while the
community service is available The context is different from the
1800s and the institutions are smaller now…
Optimism
Office for Disability and Mental Health Mental Health Inspector’s Report 2009
“Sense of beginnings of a cultural shift in term of increased professionalism, accountability and awareness of importance of good governance
The central importance of service users/patients is increasingly recognised by clinicians
Human rights obligations increasingly understood” www.mhcirl.ie
Conclusion
Policy approach is not enough Extreme caution and careful monitoring
of local activities Temptation to use established systems
as finance in place –it must stop State supported nursing home system-
extraordinarily costly approach to “community care”
Recommendations Immediate need for administrative/
management protocol Advocacy/representation must be made
available where any major changes like accommodation are proposed
Such decisions must be carefully addressed with the person
Staff managing and working in mental health services must become more aware of impact