Dr. Marcia Ory, PhD, MPH Doris Howell, MPH Alyson Zollinger, MPH Program on Healthy Aging Texas A&M Health Science Center Aging in Texas Conference Houston, TX June 2013 NEW PROGRAMS IN TEXAS FOR FALLS PREVENTION
Dec 18, 2015
Dr. Marcia Ory, PhD, MPHDoris Howell, MPHAlyson Zollinger, MPHProgram on Healthy AgingTexas A&M Health Science Center
Aging in Texas ConferenceHouston, TXJune 2013
NEW PROGRAMS IN TEXAS FOR FALLS PREVENTION
THE PROBLEM: NATIONALLY
Falls are a threat to the lives, independence, and health of older adults.
Every 18 seconds in the U.S., an older adult is ends up in an emergency department as a result a fall.
Every 35 minutes an older adult dies as a result of the injuries from a fall.
Several older adults develop a fear of falling (those who have fallen & those who have not).
Fear can cause older adults to limit their activities—leading to lead to reduced mobility & physical fitness—increasing future risk of falling.
THE PROBLEM: TEXAS
Falls are a threat to the lives, independence, and health of older Texans
Fall-related hospital charges related to hip fractures exceeded $500 million statewide.
The average hospitalization lasts approximately 6 days
The total charges of fall-related hospitalizations for all adults over age 50 years were >$1.9B
The average charge was approximately $37,000 per individual hospitalized from a fall
TEXAS A&M PROGRAM ON HEALTHY AGING: PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
Increase capacity to deliver falls-risk reduction programs
• Provide information to community leaders on community-based programs and trained lay leaders.
• Provide information on STEADI to primary care doctors serving older adults.
• Provide information on PT-based Otago program and trained PTs.
• Provide information on falls risk screening and referral to all certified CHWs and offered certified training to CHWs.
• Provide TA to State Falls Coalition Program on expanding programs and partnerships.
• Provided TA to State Falls Coalition Program on expanding programs and partnerships
Increase exposure to information on EB programs
• Inform older Texans about available falls-risk reduction programs and clinical practices
• Increase the engagement of older adults in community-wide falls reduction programs.
• Get older adults to recruit family members and friends
• Identify older adults who can get trained as lay leaders
Impact, Sustainability & Scalability of Multi-Component
Falls Prevention Programs
•Focus on three state-wide injury programs
•- Colorado•- New York•- Oregon
•Determine the impact of fall prevention interventions•- Community & home-based
programs•- Physician screening and
referrals•- System changes
Policies, Programs, and Partners for Falls Prevention
• Focus on national and community levels
• - Collaboration between Texas A&M and North Carolina
• Document falls prevention policies
• - 4 State Case Studies• NC, TX, Hawaii, NH
• Examine barriers and facilitators associated with Otago
• Facilitate uptake of evidence-based programs through the use of CHWs
TEXAS A&M: CDC- FUNDED SPECIAL INTEREST PROJECTS
PROGRAM ON HEALTHY AGING ACTIVITIES NEXT STEPS
Evidence-Based Program (EBP) Resource Exchange
A Texas A&M Physicians Group 1115 Health Transformation Program
Facilitate the expansion of the
types and location of evidence-based program delivery
sites
Unify Resources and Provide
Training, Technical Assistance and
Evaluation
Create Cost Savings for a
Growing Aging Population
For further information contact:Doris Howell, Project [email protected].
New Physical Activity Programs for Fall Prevention in Texas
Developing, Implementing, and Disseminating a Falls Prevention Curriculum for Community Health Workers
Q&A
CASE EXAMPLES
AND DISCUSSIO
N
New Physical Activity Programs for Fall Prevention in Texas
Presentation Overview
Fit & Strong!• Program Descriptions• Implementation
“New” Texercise• Program Description• Implementation
Future Directions
Q&A
AcknowledgementThe evaluation of Fit & Strong! was funded with a pilot grant from the Community Research Center for Senior Health at Scott & White Healthcare with additional funding from St. Joseph’s Healthy Communities.
The evaluation of the Texercise program was funded through the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services.
Fit & Strong!
Fit & Strong! Program Background
Implementation & Evaluation September 2012 – August 2013
Modified original program to utilize lay leader model
Texas A&M Health Science Center awarded grant from the Community Research Center for Senior Health (CRC-SH) to implement Fit & Strong! program in Texas
Fit & Strong!: existing evidence-based physical activity/behavioral change program created by the Center for Research on Health and Aging at the University
of Illinois
Fit & Strong! Program ComponentsParticipant Engagement• Physical Activity 60 min• Education 30 min
Trained facilitators• Classes led by 2 trained facilitators
Program Length• Eight week program• 3 days each week for 90 minutes
Demonstrated Benefits of Participation• Confidence in ability to exercise• Lower-extremity stiffness & pain• Improved physical activity
Fit & Strong! Program Modifications
Traditional Fit & Strong!
Class Leaders: Physical Therapists/Certified Exercise Instructors
Population: Targeted older adults with
osteoarthritis
Setting: Urban
Texas Fit & Strong!
Class Leaders: Lay Leaders
Population: All older adults
Setting: Peri-Urban & Rural
Fit & Strong! Implementation
2012 Spring
• Selection of Fit & Strong! program
2012 Summer
• Lay Leader Training
• Participants recruited
• 5 sites identified
2013MILESTONES• 12 total classes• 180+ participants
• Building Infrastructure• Master Training of program
leaders• First train-the trainer session
conducted for dissemination and sustainability
Fit & Strong! Implementation
Obstacles• Time Commitment
(3x/wk)• Identifying
“qualified” Lay Leaders
• Equipment
Successes• High Response
from Communities• Overall Satisfaction
from Participants• Health and
Functional Improvements
Fit & Strong! Can Make a Difference*Fit & Strong! Makes a Difference
Calculate % improvement:baseline-post/baseline
*Preliminary analyses from first three classes held in Bryan, College Station, and Navasota in the Brazos Valley in 2012
Improvements in:• Confidence in exercise• Lower-body stiffness and
pain• Physical Activity
Adverse Effects:No negative effects reported
Fit & Strong! : What People are Saying
70 years old and Fit and Strong. What more could I ask for? The Fit and Strong program has become an essential to my everyday living. It has infiltrated my every movement and thought.
What a difference eight solid weeks of exercises has made me what I am today—limber; tension-reduced neck and shoulders; mindful of my every step; conscious of my eating habits. You cannot ask for a more information, action packed program taught by people who are in the know.
I have taken the course twice and hope to continue for a third, fourth, etc. times. It has changed me and I am better for it.
-Fit & Strong! Participant
Texercise
Fit For The Health of It!
New Texercise Program Background
Implementation for evaluation September 2012 – August 2013
Creation of structured Texercise program incorporating behavioral change principles
Texas A&M Health Science Center awarded RFI in 2012 to evaluate Texercise program
DADS seeking evidence-based status for existing program
New Texercise Program Components
Participant Engagement• Physical activity 30-45 min• Education focusing on physical activity and nutrition topics
Trained Facilitators• 1 trained facilitator
Program Length• 12 Week Program• 2 x/wk for 90 min each
Potential Benefits of Participation• Increased self-efficacy (pre/post)• Improved physical activity and nutrition behaviors• Improved mobility (TUG)
New Texercise Program: What People Are Saying About the Program
“Due to the lack of physical activity opportunities for the elderly, transportation, and distance to PA opportunities, the Texercise program is a great fit for rural residents.
There is much more to the program than solely physical activity. There is a social component.
The program is not too intensive. It allows participants to maintain physical activity.”
-Robert Shaw, Executive Director of the Madison Health Resource Commission
Texercise Program Modifications
Traditional Texercise
Duration: 12 weeks
Class Leaders: Varied, no training
Class format: Unstructured PA &
education
New Texercise
Duration: 10 weeks (2 weeks recruitment)
Class Leaders: Trained
Class format: Structured PA & education
New Texercise Program Implementation
2012• Begin research• Identify EBP’s PA
Programs• What works?
2012• Develop
Manual• Facilitator
Training• Identify Sites
2013• Facilitator
Trainings• Fidelity Checks• Program
Support• Reporting
New Texercise Program Implementation
Obstacles• 10 Week Commitment• Fidelity (program adherence
among facilitators)• Mixing of existing program
with “new” program
Successes• Participants enjoy
interaction• Focuses on both nutrition
and physical activity• Time flexibility-2
days/week, rather than 3 days/week
• Appropriate for both urban and rural areas
• Feasible for community adoption (e.g. no equipment requirements)
New Texercise Program Products
Structured Program Implementation Manual
Facilitator Training Protocol
Review of Texercise History and Reach
Report on Stakeholders Perceptions
Published Manuscript on Outcomes
Future Direction of Programs
Fit & Strong• Expansion into other communities• Adaptation for specific populations (i.e. Cancer)
Texercise• Development of online training• Offer the New Texercise program in communities
Both Programs• Offer programs as complementary programs to other
evidence-based programs (AMOB, CDSMP, DSMP)
Question & Answer
DEVELOPING, IMPLEMENTING, AND DISSEMINATING A FALLS PREVENTION CURRICULUM FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERSDoris Howell, MPH
Julie St. John, MA, MPH, CHWI, DrPH
Christopher E. Beaudoin, PhD
Tiffany E. Shubert, PhD, MPT
Cherie Rosemond, PT, PhD
Marcia G. Ory, PhD, MPH
Matthew Smith, PhD, MPH, CHES
This project was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevention Research Center, Special Interest Project—cooperative agreement number 5U48DP001P240. Materials were created by the grantee and any sub-grantees thereof, and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the CDC. The CDC makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites and including, but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or ownership.
Acknowledgement
Background & Objective
Background
• Policies, Programs, and Partners for Fall Prevention (PPPFP) study incorporates
• multi-level intervention approaches to address fall prevention• PPPFP uses several dissemination research methodologies—
including training Community Health Workers (CHWs) to deliver fall prevention messages
Objective
• Discuss the development, implementation, & dissemination of the falls prevention CHW curriculum
The Solution: CHWs
Community Health
Workers
Frontline workers
Liaisons
Facilitators
Trusted
Paid or volunteers
Same attributes
The Strategy: Why Utilize CHWs in Fall Prevention?
The bottom line• CHWs often interact with older adults• CHWs are generally trusted by older adults
The result• CHWs are a natural avenue to help older adults to prevent
& reduce falls & related injuries • State-wide & national searches did not yield a current,
comprehensive, fall prevention curriculum for CHWs• This finding lead to the development of a CHW, evidence-
based, fall-prevention curriculum
Curriculum Development
Researched current fall prevention curricula
Identified best practice
strategies to incorporate in
CHW curriculum
Outlined key concepts to teach CHWs regarding fall prevention &
reduction
Brain-stormed “fall prevention”
concepts & curriculum outline with groups of
CHWs
Incorporated ideas and word
choices from brain-storming sessions into the curriculum development
Curriculum Development
Involved core group of certified CHWs & CHW instructors in curriculum
development (in English & Spanish)
Fall prevention experts
reviewed & revised
curriculum to check content &
accuracy
Pilot tested curriculum with CHWs (English
& Spanish)
Refined curriculum based on
feedback from content experts & pilot testing with CHWs
Disseminated curriculum through in-
person and on-line trainings (English & Spanish)
CHW Fall Prevention Curriculum Framework & Purpose
Utilized best practice models:• Training CHWs• Adult learning theory• Message tailoring
Overall Purpose of Curriculum:• CHWs receiving the trainings implement the
information to connect at-risk older adults to medical services & evidence-based community fall prevention programs
Curriculum Objectives
Explain why preventing and reducing falls and injuries among older people is especially important
Increase awareness of risk factors for falling inside and outside the home
Develop and augment observation, reporting, and communication skills to reduce fall and injury risk factors
Describe ways to help prevent or manage client falls
Curriculum Objectives
Develop falls prevention plans
Explain and discuss different approaches to changing health behaviors
Teach health behavior change strategies to CHWs and residents
CHWs & residents apply behavior change strategies to falls prevention and reduction
Curriculum OutlineSession 1: Ways to Prevent Falls and Related Injuries in Older Adults-
the Role of Fall Prevention
Welcome & introduction (pre-test)
Facts on falls (statistics, falls are predictable & preventable)
Individual & environmental fall risk factors
Summary of identification & reduction of fall risk factors
Closing (post-test & evaluation)
Curriculum OutlineSession 2: Learning Skills to Reduce Falls and Related Injuries
Welcome & introduction (pre-test)
Risk factor review & managing falls
Using communication skills to reduce older adults’ risks for falling
Identifying fall prevention resources in your community
Closing (post-test & evaluation)
Curriculum OutlineSession 3: Helping Older Adults Change Their Health Behaviors to
Prevent Falls and Related Injuries: Health Behavior Change Theories
Welcome & introduction (pre-test)
Theories of health behavior change
Review of fall risk factors, strategies for managing falls, & tailored communication
Applying behavior change concepts to falls prevention & reduction
Working with residents/CHWs to implement behavioral changes to prevent falls
Closing (post-test & evaluation)
Dissemination
The curriculum was first offered online in Texas—providing CEUs
as part of the state CHW recertification process.
Curriculum was adapted & disseminated to North Carolina
for in-person training.
Curriculum made available nationally via the online formats.
Implications & Innovations
Innovation:• CHWs actively involved in all phases of the
project (research, curriculum input, development, pilot-testing, training conduction, & dissemination)
• Combined multiple evidence-based practices & strategies (fall prevention, CHW training, message tailoring, CBPR)
Implications: • CHW-tailored curriculum can reach larger
proportions of high-risk older adults outside of healthcare settings through evidence-based fall prevention strategies via message tailoring & utilization of CHWs
Questions & ReferencesQuestions?
References• National Council on Aging (NCOA) & Paraprofessional Healthcare
Institute (PHI) (2010). Fall Prevention Awareness: Enhanced Training Curriculum for Home Health Aides. Funded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration—DOL502(e). http://phinational.org/training/resources/phi-curricula/fall-prevention-awareness
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Falls Among Older Adults: An Overview. http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Falls/adultfalls.html
• Minnesota Falls Prevention. “Know your Medications.” http://www.mnfallsprevention.org/consumer/medications.html
Question & Answer