-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION /4/~
TiJfd/lPl(,/dt,§tJUIRni§l&e&U
August 1, 2017
Dr. Andrew Melin Greater Clark County Schools: #1010 2112
Utica-Sellersburg Rd. Jeffersonville, IN 47130
Dear Dr. Andrew Melin,
Thank you for your recent renewal application for a 1003(g)
School Improvement Grant under the ESEA. Congratulations,
Bridgepoint Elementary School's renewal application was accepted
and SIG funds will continue for SY 2017-2018.
In accordance with your application and available funding, you
are being awarded $113,340.00 for the 2017-2018 school year. Funds
for this grant period are available from July 1, 2017 and must be
expended by September 30, 2018. .. .. - •Federal Program Title
I
Federal Agency ·-·· • • • • -~~!S Through Agency ... ·-·· • • •
• CFDA Number : , Award Name School Im rovement Grants
Award Number S377A 140015
The Title I§ 1003(g) School Improvement Grant award must be used
to supplement the level of funds that, in the absence of the Title
I monies, would be made available from non-federal sources for the
education of the students at this school. Improvement funds must be
tracked separately from all other Title I Grants. Local fiscal
agents are to place improvement funds in a Title I account assigned
for school improvement (this funding number must not be the same
number as is used for the Title I Basic grant award). Because these
are school improvement funds, districts may not combine funds into
one account, and the amount awarded to each school must be spent on
improvement initiatives at that particular school.
We look forward to continuing our work with your team this
school year. Please feel free to contact Erin Stalbaum at
[email protected] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Nathan Williamson Director of Title Grants and Support Indiana
Department of Education
cc: Title I Program Administrator SIG Coordinator Principal
115 W. Washington Street • South Tower, Suite 600 •
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
317.232.6610 • www.doe.in.gov
http:www.doe.in.govmailto:[email protected]:113,340.00
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~ k1~f/i>~,11n£-1n1
Title I -1003(g) School Improvement Grant Renewal Application SY
2017-2018 Cohorts 6 and 7-Transformation Model
Part 1: Grantee Information Instructions: Complete school and
district information below.
i.J.i.lC.IJJJ[(_j_l.JZJIMIR&iitli Greater Clark County
Schools 15.13.l! Bridgepoint Elementary School
Dr. Andrew Melin
Amy Schellenberg
Jacqueline Diaz
(812)288~4858
$113,340.00
1010
0865
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
I
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~ lo~pt,~l:L£...U..C
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 'TIY1ffJf'/f,~·.~·IfffP'EU
Instructions: Please complete the table below regc1r'C:iing
w_t-ig \IV'as involvecl \IV'_it~the grant process.
Title Name
Stacy Parker Academic Improvement Coach
Amy Schellenberg Executive Director for School and Instructional
Improvement
Erica Hinton 1st Grade Teacher - BLT Member
Alisha Blanton 2nd Grade Teacher - BLT Member
Season Neal 3rd Grade Teacher - BLT Member
Olivia Huggins School Outreach Coordinator
Dr. Kim Hartlage Assistant Superintendent Elementary
Jacqueline Diaz Principal
3
-
fjJ Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~TiJ~f13gi,u,uPFU
Part 3: LEA and School Assurances
Instructions: Certain terms and conditions are required for
receiving funds under the School Improvement 1003g Grant and
through the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Therefore, by
signing the following assurances, the grantee agrees to comply with
all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules
and regulations, provisions and public policies required and all
assurances in the performance of this grant as stated below.
The LEA/Eligible Entity must provide the following assurances in
its application. The LEA/Eligible Entity must be able to provide,
upon request, evidence of compliance with each assurance.
• Use its School Improvement Grant to implement fully and
effectively an intervention in each Priority school that the LEA
commits to serve consistent with
the final requirements
• Establish annual goals for student achievement on the State's
assessments in both reading/language arts and mathematics and
measure progress on the
leading indicators,and key school categories. Monitor each
Priority school that an LEA serves with school improvement funds,
and establish goals (approved
by the SEA) to hold accountable Priority schools that receive
school improvement funds
• If an LEA implements a restart model in a Priority school,
include in its contract or agreement terms and provisions to hold
the charter operator, charter
management organization, or education management organization
accountable for complying with the final requirements (only need to
check if school is
choosing RESTART model)
• Monitor and evaluate the actions a school has taken, as
outlined in the approved SIG application, to recruit, select and
provide oversight to external
providers to ensure their quality
• Ensure that each Priority school that an LEA commits to serve
receives all of the State and local funds it would receive in the
absence of the school
improvement funds and that those resources are aligned with the
interventions
• Monitor and evaluate the actions schools have taken, as
outlined in the approved SIG application, to sustain the reforms
after the funding period ends and
that it will provide technical assistance to schools on how they
can sustain progress in the absence of SIG funding
• Collaboration with the Teacher's Union, include letters from
the teachers' union with each school application indicating its
agreement to fully participate in
all components of the school improvement model selected (n/a for
charter schools)
• Report to the SEA the school-level data required under leading
indicators for the final requirements
4
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION I1u1r1.un.#h,.gtl
• The LEA and School have consulted with all stakeholders
regarding the LEA's intent to implement a new school improvement
model.
• This application has been completed by a team consisting of a
minimum of: one LEA central office staff, the building principal,
at least two building staff
members.
• Establish and maintain fiscal control and fund accounting
procedures, as set forth in 34 CFR Part 7 and in applicable federal
and state laws and regulations.
• The Title I School Improvement funds will be used only to
supplement and not supplant federal, state and local funds a school
would otherwise receive.
• Prior written approval must be received from the Indiana
Department of Education before implementing any project changes
with respect to the purposes
for which the proposed funds are awarded.
• Retain all records of the financial transactions and accounts
relating to the proposed project for a period of three years after
termination of the grant
agreement and shall make such records available for inspection
and audit as necessary.
• Provide ongoing technical assistance to schools identified for
Title I School Improvement as they develop or revise their school
improvement plan, and
throughout the implementation of that plan.
• Coordinate the technical assistance that is provided to
schools in Title I School Improvement. Assistance to schools may be
provided by district staff or
external consultants with experience and expertise in helping
schools improve academic achievement.
• Expenditures contained in this Title I School Improvement
Application accurately reflect the school improvement plan(s).
• Assist the school in analyzing results from the state
assessment system and other relevant examples of student work.
Technical assistance will be provided to
school staff to enable them to use .data to identify and solve
problems in curriculum and instruction, to strengthen parental
involvement and professional
development, and to fulfill other responsibilities that are
defined in the school improvement plan.
• The district will help the school choose and sustain effective
instructional strategies and methods and ensure that the school
staff receives high quality
professional development relevant to the implementation of
instructional strategies. The chosen strategies must be grounded in
scientifically based research
and address the specific instruction or other issues, such as
attendance or graduation rate, that caused the school to be
identified for school improvement.
• The Indiana Department of Education may, as they deem
necessary, supervise, evaluate, and provide guidance and direction
to the district and school in the
management of the activities performed under this plan.
• The schools and district shall adhere to Indiana Department of
Education reporting and evaluation requirements in a timely and
accurate manner.
5
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION /ol·~,unP.rH.
By signing below, the LEA agrees to all assurances above and
certifies the following:
• The information in this application is, to the best of my
knowledge, true. The agency named here has authorized me, as its
representative, to file this
application and all amendments, and as such action is recorded
in the minutes of the agency's meeting date.
• I have reviewed the assurances and the LEA understands and
will comply with all applicable assurances for federal funds.
• I will participate in all Title I data reporting, monitoring,
and evaluation activities as requested or required by the United
States Department of Education, the
Indiana Department of Education (!DOE), and Indiana Code,
including on-site and desktop monitoring conducted by the IDOE,
required audits by the state
board of accounts, annual reports, and final expenditure
reporting for the use of subgrant funds.
• By submitting this application the LEA certifies that neither
it nor its principals nor any of its subcontractors are presently
debarred, suspended, proposed for
debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded by any
federal agency or by any department, agency or political
subdivision of the State of Indiana.
The term "principal" for purposes of this application means an
officer, director, owner, partner, key employee or other person
with primary management or
supervisory responsibilities, or a person who has a critical
influence on or substantive control over the operations of the
LEA.
The LEA has verified the state and federal suspension and
debarment status for all subcontractors receiving funds under the
fund associated with this application and shall be solely
responsible for any recoupment, penalties or costs that might arise
from use of a suspended or debarred subcontractor. The LEA shall
immediately notify the State if any subcontractor becomes debarred
or suspended, and shall, at the State's request, take all steps
required by the State to terminate its contractual relationship
with the subcontractor for work to be performed and supported by
funding from the application.
JacS'lueline Di
June 30, 2017
June 30, 2017
June 30, 2017
6
http:ol�~,unP.rH
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Part 4: Achievement and Leading Indicators SY 16-17
Percent of students proficient on ISTEP {Both ELA and Math)
(3-8) 145% 165% 142% 165%
Percent of students proficient on ISTEP (ELA) (3-8) 161.8% 175%
161.2% 175%
Percent of students proficient on !STEP {Math) (3-8) 65.7% 75%
54.1% 75%
Percent ofstudents proficient on IREAD (Spring 90.% 90% 75% 90%
Test Only) (3):- Elementary only
10th grade EGA pass rate {English 10) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a h/a
n/a
10th grade ECA pass rate. (Algebra I) ri/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a
Non-Waiver Graduation Rate -HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a
College enrollment rates- HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a
1. Number of minutes in the school year 77,4 students are
required to attend school 77,400 77,400 77,400 00
2. Number of daily minutes of math instruction 60 60 60 60
3. Number of daily minutes of ELA instruction 90 90 90 60
4, Dropout rate- HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a 5.
Student enrollment number 347 380 366 380
6. Student attendance rate {must be% between 96% 96% 95.9%
96%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a ri/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a I
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
7
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Oand 100)
7. Numberofstudents completing advanced coursework{e.g.,
AP/1.B)- HS only
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
8. Number ofstudents completingdual enrollment classes-HS
only
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
9. Number ofstudents who completed BOTH an advanced
coursework& a,dual enrollment cla.ss-HS only
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
10. Types of increased learning time offered: 2 2 3 3
11. Number of discipline referrals 661 200 212 200
12. Discipline incidents- number of suspensions and/or
expulsion
SUS-- 62 EXP--0
SUS-40 EXP-- 0
SUS49 EXP-- 0
SUS-40 EXP0
SUSEXP
SUSEXP-
SUS-EXP
SUS-EXP-
SUS-EXP-
SUSEXP
SUS-EXP
SUS-EXP
SUS-EXP-
13. Truants- number of unduplicated students who have received
truancy letters or action, enter as a whole number 0 0 0 0
14. Distribution of teacher performance level on LEA's teacher
evaluation system
IN--0 IMP-0 EFF-- 88% HEFF--12%
IN--0 IMP-0 EFF90% HEFF-10%
IN--0 IMP-0 EFF--92
% HEFF-8%
IN-IMP-EFFHEFF -
IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-
IN-IMPEFF-HEFF-
IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-
INIMP-EFFHEFF-
IN-IMPEFFHEFF~
IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-
IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF
INIMP-EFF-HEFF-
IN-IMP-EFFHEFF-
15. Teacher attendance rate {must be a % between Oand 100) 96%
96% 96% 97%
16. Teacher retention rate (must be a % between 0 and 100) 80%
95% 91% 95%
8
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF.EDUCATION
Part 5: Analysis and Outcomes Instructions: SIOT Activity:
(Strengths, Improvements, Opportunities, and Threats) • List
school's primary strengths and weaknesses from SY 16-17-forces or
barriers working for and against SIG implementation or school's
mission • List school's key opportunities and threats from SY
16-17-political, economic, social, technological, demographic, or
legal trends that are or may impact school's
ability to achieve SIG implementation or school's mission. •
What are the projected outcomes for SY 17-18 after completing the
SIOT Analysis? Are there any opportunities we can take advantage of
because of a strength?
Are there any threats compounded by a weakness?
Strengths: • Implementation of level literacy groups • Greater
participation by parents • Staff growth in developing relationships
with students and redirecting
classroom behavior • Small group instruction in order to
differentiate for student needs • Staff understanding of
de-escalation strategies • Students utilizing skills for self help
and regulation resulting in fewer
discipline referrals and loss of time in classroom
Opportunities: • Increasing the rigor of the classroom based
activities • Increasing the student independence for academic tasks
• Strong relationships with families and greater commitment by
community partners to support Bridgepoint in all areas •
Decreased behavior issues • Gaps in academic achievement decrease
and overall achievement
increases • Decrease in barriers to academic achievement
Areas of Improvement: • Better use of data collected to evaluate
instructional practices and help
better meet the student academic needs • Tier l of PRIDE program
--- utilizing school wide class dojo • Balanced Math framework and
inconsistent instruction in numeracy
Threats: • Teacher frustration when progress is slow • PB1S
implementation being too rigorous • Students learn procedures for
math, but not gaining foundational number
sense
9
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION #n,·~UfJM~II,
• Bridgepoint Elementary School projects that through the
continued implementation of the School Improvement grant we will
gain a deeper understanding of the ELA Guided Reading framework and
the implementation of more rigorous independent activities, a
greater understanding of reflective data analysis leading to
changes in instructional practices, and the abiliiy to increase
parental involvement in our school. The continued focus on ELA
Guided Reading Framework and Balanced Mathematics as well as
targeting positive parental outreach will improve the school's
learning culture.
10
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
7DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ·#tt.··.~HfJP'TUruunrn
Part 6: SIG Implementation SY 2017-2018
Instructions: !DOE has aligned the renewal application with
Transformation principles and required/recommended interventions in
column one below as Focus Areas. Please complete the entire table
and align your SY17-18 action steps.
SAMPLE: SAMPLE: Meadows School will provide before and after
SAMPLE: SAMPLE: SAMPLE: The Crunch Time program will be. Increase
learning time school opportunities for all students to help
increase Multiple $5,000 tracked using a google spreadsheet to
document
student achievement called, Crunch Time. Person Phases Stipends
what before/after school program students Responsible: Ms. Smith,
Title I Interventionist {Multiple attended. This data will be
compared to student
Quarters) achievement data.
Develop School 1) leadership Implement process and guidelines
for Ql-4. I s1s,ooo 1-leadership Leadership reviewing
Transformation Principal effectiveness prior to Effectiveness full
implementation 10 days supporting systems of
1) Analysis of Data: District, Principal and leadership.
Technical Assistance Provider will use critical
indicators from Principal Effectiveness.and Mentor: Dr. Rhonda
Roos implementation data [implementation gauge; $1,500/day
walkthrough observations; artifacts] to identify
strengths and areas for additional support The Principal will
develop an action plan 2) Feedback and Plan for Improvement based
on for 30, 60, 90, 120, 185, 200 days
DataWise 8-Step Process: Establish tools and outlining
objectives for Curriculum, milestones for accomplishing goals
Instruction, Assessment, Professional
Development and Operations Management.
11
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , "•~'·" >2c{i...
f-fr.A3fh•;,,.::,,t
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
team and increase their capacity as a viable
member
4) Implement continuous school improvement process with
consistency and integrity:
DataWise 8-Step Process: a} Step 1: Organize for Collaborative
Work
b) Step 2: Build Assessment Literacy
c) Step 3.: Create Data Overview
d) Step 4: Dig into Data
e) Step 5: Examine Instruction
f) Step 6 : Develop Action Plan
g) Step 7: Plan to Assess Progress h) Step 8: Act and Assess
[
Ql-4 No SIG Funds Local Funds
4-Continuous Improvement Process
Completed PL221 Plan
Develop Teacher Implement system for supporting teacher Ql-4
$450for3 Professional dialogue resulting from classroom
Effectiveness effectiveness:
1) Teachers will adhere to belief statements regarding teaching
children from poverty that
were previously developed as the foundation for
instruction. [Certified Staff]
2) Use RISE Teacher Evaluation system that
includes student growth as a factor
substitute teachers to cover classes while teachers conduct
walkthroughs and hold facilitated
walkthroughs will be documented and reviewed to determine
adjustments required to professional development
offerings/support.
13
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
VVIY'lRlll'll,.,~-'f1-2·~T.2."•../til#l.>
discussions
Implement Comprehensive Instructional Reform Strategies
Provide incentives for highly effective teachers 1) Provide
opportunities for leadership growth 2) Provide weekly scheduled
collaboration time
for staff
3) Provide weekly job-embedded PD
4) Provide weekly observation/ feedback based on implementation
gauge aligned to core
strategies
Implement an instructional framework based on key elements of
lesson design that includes: • Culturally responsive texts will be
used in classrooms
in order to ensure students are reading.from authentic
texts during the release or "You do" step of the GRR
model. [Principal, AIC]
• Teachers will plan instructional units in both ELA and
Math, aligned to the INCRRS, based on the Gradual
Release of Responsibility model. Units will follow the
pacing of standards prescribed by the district.
[Principal, Certified Staff]
• Teachers will utilize rigorous technology resources (IXL Math
and RAZ Kids) to differentiate instruction for
student needs in both ELA and Math.
• Teachers will implement independent reading in each grade
level to build reading stamina and reading
motivation. Accountability for students during
Ql-4
Q1-4
No SIG Funds Local Funds
No SIG Funds Local Funds
Identified Highly Effective Teachers will be provided with first
rights of refusal for leadership position and district professional
development training opportunities.
Teacher lesson plans will reflect instructional framework
components.
14
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
independent reading are expected to be rigorous and
consistent. [Principal, Certified Staff]
• Through the Balanced Math framework, grade level
teams are expected to address the needs of students
not meeting mastery of INCCRS by remediating and
re-teaching.
Implement on-going PD targeting best practices Ql-4 $950 (1
staff Ron Clark Academy determined by observation data and student
members at Teachers attending Ron Clark Academy will achievement:
$900 per provide follow-up professional development to • Teachers
will attend the two-day educator workshop in person to staff.
Atlanta, Georgia at the Ron Clark Academy. The Ron register for
Clark Academy focuses on engagement and motivation the 2-day
Building Leadership Team will develop action of all students, with
a focus on at-risk students. Six educator plan on increasing
student engagement from
teachers will attend each school year until all teachers
workshop) strategies learned at Ron Clark Academy.
have attended. $S0(pay portion of travel expenses}
15
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
• Teachers are expected to implement the Balanced Ql-4 Stipends
for Balanced Math
Math framework during their math blocks, including a Balance
Math Teacher Lesson Plans will reflect Balanced Math
Daily Math Review. [Principal, Balanced Math Trainer, PD (25
framework including Daily Math Review.
Certified Staff] teachers x $200x2 Student DMRassessment data
will be reviewed sessions= to influence instructional adjustments.
$3,000)
Walkthrough data will be used to monitor strategy implementation
and shared during collaboration periods.
Ql-4 $2,000for Continuous Improvement Implement appropriate PD
to supportstaff in reflecting, supplies for Common Quarter
Assessment Data, Benchmark revising and evaluating classroom
practices to improve data Data, and State Assessment Data will be
learning outcomes: binders-{bind reviewed and documented to drive
the school's • Organizing for collaborative work ers, paper, PL221
Improvement plan. • DataWise 8-Step Process dividers, flash •
Talking about Data drives)
• Using data to inform Instruction [assessment literacy]
• Making our data visible [knowing what to celebrate and what
challenges we continue to
Stipends for Quarterly
face] Data Dinners (food not provided through grant funds)
$9,000
Increase Learning Student Learning Time Ql-4 SIG Funding Point
of contact data will be collected and Time • An Outreach
Coordinator will establish resources for noted in analyzed
quarterly to determine number of
under-resourced families and connect families with Community
families reached through outreach program.
needed resources. [Principal, SAM] Outreach Student data will
also be reviewed to Section of
16
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick
Teachers will provide tutoring for two hours each• week to
students participating in CIS after school care program. [Outreach
Coordinator, Tutors]
• Summer Read and Feed Program - available to ALL students
Q1-4
Summer
Renewal Application
$12,800 to pay 4 teachers $50 per hour for 2 hours per week for
tutoring services (based on 32 weeks)
$1,000for materials (st udent notebooks, folders, take-home
books.
$10,SOOto pay3 teachers for summer read and feed program ($50
average/hou r / 4 hours/18 days)
determine impact of outreach and extended learning
Student data folders will be reviewed quarterly to determine
impact of tutoring.
Student data folders will be reviewed at end of summer program
to determine reading level growth of student participants in read
and feed program.
17
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------=,~-~,
_,w _.,,_,_______________
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
$3,600 Summer buses($200/ day/3 days/3 buses)
$3,940 Student take home Books for Summer Read and Feed
Grant
Create Implement culturally competent programs to increase Q1-4
$50,000 salary The Outreach Coordinator will establish
Community-Oriented family and community engagement: and benefits
resources for Bridgepoint, such as a food pantry Schools Parent
workshops using the Parenting with Love and• and a clothes closet.
The Outreach Coordinator
Logic curriculum will be presented each month by will also
assist with the planning and promoting
the Outreach Coordinator. of the monthly parenting workshops.
The
Teachers will be asked to attend 4 of these• workshops in order
to facilitate discussions and
Outreach Coordinator will report directly to the SAM. In an
effort to build capacity in working with
network with parents. [Outreach Coordinator, SAM, parents among
staff, Love and Logic will provide 4 Certified Staff] $1600 (Travel
a common foundation for staff when talking to Implement annual
survey to collect input about • to National parents about
establishing boundaries and topics of interest and how those topics
might be Social Worker routines at home. Parenting with Love and
Logic accessible for them [i.e. onsite; webinars; flexible -March,
2018 includes a curriculum with presentation times] in Columbus
materials for staff to use for presenting parent
Implement evaluation to monitor the family • engagement
activities to inform programs and
OH Registration:
workshops. The entire curriculum can be used through the course
of a school year, or specific
improve family engagement
Implement plan for disseminating student progress • $700/ Travel
$700
parts can be pulled in response to a need within our parent
community.
and how the school is meeting goals [i.e., share PerDiem areas
of challenge] $200
18
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENTOF EDUCATION
Provide Operational Flexibility
Implement "flexibility" plan identifying and describing
guidelines and activities to sustain the Transformation model at
Bridgepoint Elementary School: 1) Align flexibility plan w/
Principal Effectiveness
System to specific indicators for the Transformation
Leader
2) Flexibility Plan will include: [i.e., calendars; PD;
staffing]• Teachers will spend a c:iay planning• collaboratively
with grade level team prior to the
beginning of the school year, and using data
from the prior end of school year. Planning will
include, but is not limited to, gathering data
from previous end of school year assessments
and forming intervention groups for reading.
3) Ongoing, technical assistance Bridgepoint will
receive to support the implementation of the
Transformation model
4) Schedule of monthly District/ Transformation
Leader/ Mentor meetings and focus
1) Specific indicators and data for each meeting
[milestones]
Ql-4 No SIG Funds
Leading Indicators and Data Dashboards will be monitored
3x/quarter
Sustain Support Analysis of Flexibility and Sustainability Plan
Implementation Data-Executive Director for School/Instructional
Improvement and BLT]
Ql-4 No SIG Funds
Leading Indicators and Data Dashboards will be monitored
3x/quarter
19
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION lA./u,..,.., SWJ1A
-
Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Part 8: Budget SY 17-18
Instructions: The budget will be completed in a separate Excel
workbook for SY 2017-2018, and must include any changes from the
original budget submission. Once approved by IDOE, will serve as
the operating budget for the duration of the school year, unless
otherwise amended and approved by IDOE.
21
-
Expenditure
Number Account
Account
11000 Instruction [9]
support Services21000 1 Student [10] Improvement of
Instruction 22100 I (Professional
Development) __lU
22900 I Other Support Services [12]
Refund of 25191 I Revenue [13] Operation &26000 Maintenance
[ 14]
27000 Transportation
Community 33000 I Service
Operations [15]
Transfers60100 I (interfund) [16] Column Totals
Cert Non Cert $ $ 3,800.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 15,450.00$ 9,000.00
$ 40,000.00 $ 10,000.00
$ 2s,ooo.ool_$ 40,000.oo_U ~soo.oo_JJ; JQ,ooo.ooJJ 11,450.oo
Rentals [2]
I $ Indirect Cost: Subtract the amount above $251000
Total Available for Indirect Costs: Amount ofindirect Cost to be
used: Grand Total After Indirect Cost: I $ 113,340.00
$
$
$
950.00 I $
3,600.00
1,600.00
2,000.00
Property [5] , ,,.,____,.__ rn I Line Totals
$ 27,740.00 - $ -
$ 30,400.00
- $ -$ -$
$ 3,600.00
$ 51,600.00
$ $ 113,340.006,150.00ll__i,_940.00 I $ $
illTI DIRECTIONS: Provide a narrative below on how funding is
allocated. E.g. Other Purchase Services: $1,500-- PD for mentor
teachers to attend New Tech training; $4,000 --administration team
attending NASTID conference
Supnlies [17 Pronerty: Equipment/ Technology [18 Materials for
Tutoring ($1,000 student notebooks, folders, take-home books)/
Summer Read and Feed ($3,940 for student take-home books)/
Professional Development ($2,000 data binders, paper, dividers,
flash drives
Professional Services [19 Other PurchaseServices (travel,
communication) [20 Dr. Rhonda Roos Leadership Mentor Travel to Ron
Clark/ Bus for Summer Read and Feed/ Travel to School Social
Worker
National Conference
Staff Name [21] Staff Position [22] Cert/ Non- I FTE: (24]
Certified. [23]
http:113,340.00http:11,450.oohttp:10,000.00http:40,000.00http:9,000.00http:15,450.00http:3,000.00http:3,800.00
-
Olivia Huggins Outreach Coordinator Non-Certified 1 N N
Community outreach services coordinator
Various Tutoring Certified y Afterschool tutoring program
Various Summer Read and Feed Certified y Summer tutoring on read
and feed bus
Various Professional Development Certified y Teachers attend
afterschool/summer professional development in alignment with ,
grant activities
Structure
BookmarksFigureFigureFigurei.J.i.lC.IJJJ[(_j_l.JZJIMIR&iitli
Greater Clark County Schools 15.13.l! Bridgepoint Elementary School
Dr. Andrew Melin Amy Schellenberg Jacqueline Diaz (812)288~4858
$113,340.00 1010 0865 [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected] FigureSchool
Improvement Grant U.S. Department of Education Indiana Department
of Education 84.377A School Improvement Grants S377A0012001SA
FigureFigurefjJ FigureFigureJacS'lueline Di June 30, 2017 June 30,
2017 June 30, 2017 FigurePercent ofstudents proficient on ISTEP
{Both ELA and Math) (3-8) 145% 165% 142% 165% Percent of students
proficient on ISTEP (ELA) (3-8) 161.8% 175% 161.2% 175% Percent of
students proficient on !STEP {Math) (3-8) 65.7% 75% 54.1% 75%
Percent ofstudents proficient on IREAD (Spring 90.% 90% 75% 90%
Test Only) (3):-Elementary only 10th grade EGA pass rate {English
10) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a h/a n/a 10th grade ECA pass rate. (Algebra
I) ri/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Non-Waiver Graduation Rate -HS only
n/a n/a n/a
nFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigure6,150.00ll__i,_940.00
I $ $ illTI Staff Name [21] Staff Position [22] Cert/ Non-I FTE:
(24] Certified. [23]