Project No. 0-4617: Identifying Delays in the ROW and Utility Relocation Processes Affecting Construction and Development Methods for Expediting the Processes Dr James T. O’Connor Dr G. Edward Gibson Mr Rei-Lin (Garry) Chang Mr Stephen M. Hedemann Dr Wai-Kiong (Oswald) Chong
30
Embed
Dr James T. O’Connor Dr G. Edward Gibson Mr Rei-Lin (Garry) Chang Mr Stephen M. Hedemann Dr Wai-Kiong (Oswald) Chong
Project No. 0-4617: Identifying Delays in the ROW and Utility Relocation Processes Affecting Construction and Development Methods for Expediting the Processes. Dr James T. O’Connor Dr G. Edward Gibson Mr Rei-Lin (Garry) Chang Mr Stephen M. Hedemann Dr Wai-Kiong (Oswald) Chong. AGENDA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Project No. 0-4617:Identifying Delays in the ROW and
Utility Relocation Processes Affecting
Construction and Development Methods for Expediting the
Processes
Dr James T. O’ConnorDr G. Edward Gibson
Mr Rei-Lin (Garry) ChangMr Stephen M. Hedemann
Dr Wai-Kiong (Oswald) Chong
AGENDA
• Study Overview• ROW Study• Utility Study• Conclusions• Questions
AGENDA
• Study Overview• ROW Study• Utility Study• Conclusions• Questions
Problem Statement
How long does ROW acquisition take?
How long does utility relocation take?
What are the drivers of duration?
Study Objectives
Develop:• Process model for ROW
acquisition and utility relocation• Duration metrics and • Advisory tool for duration
estimation
Data BasisROW:• Number of projects: 55• ROW parcels: 200 + • Interviews: Five Districts, Texas Turnpike
Authority (TTA), ROW DivisionUtilities:• Number of projects: 67• Utility adjustments: 300 +• Interviews: Six Districts, TTA, ROW
Division
Process Map
• 100+ activities• Stratified by organization• Shows integration and links to PS&E • Key milestones• Some “aha’s” and future
improvements
Process Map
Businesses,Farms& Non-ProfitOrganizations
YES
Parcel Owner Rejected
Rejected
(3)Preliminary
DesignConference
(16) OngoingAssistance forMoving, Re-
establishment& Searching for
Location
(19)Begin
CurativeWork
(9) ReceiveTitle Information:
5 Year SalesData &
Preliminary TitleCommitment
(19.2) DistrictRecommendsto Approve /
Deny
(2) EarlyCoordination
with LocalAgencies
(20) Calculate andRecommend
Supplements forR/W Division
Approval
(13)Assign
Appraiser
(6) Obtain:- Environmental Clearance- Local Agency Agreements
• Study Overview• ROW Study• Utility Study• Conclusions• Questions
Cumulative % for ROW Acq. > 10 ParcelsROW Release Possession Critical Path Parcels v. Typical Parcels
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Time (Calendar Days)
Cum
ulat
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pro
ject
s th
at h
ave
R1
acqu
ired
befo
re
the
Tim
e R
ange
CPP >10 Parcels (PAT) TPAT > 10 Parcels (TPAT)
ROW Release
Critical Path Parcel (N = 41)
Typical Parcel (N = 132)
Cumulative % for ROW Acq. ROW Release Possession
by Number of Parcels
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Time (Calendar Days)
Cum
ulat
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pro
ject
s th
at h
ave
R1
acqu
ired
befo
re th
e Ti
me
Ran
ge
Greater than 30 Parcels per Project (PAT) 10-30 Parcels per Project (PAT) Less than 10 Parcels Per Project (PAT)
ROW Release
> 30 Parcels (N = 108)
10-30 Parcels (N = 88)
< 10 Parcels (N = 27)
Cumulative % for ROW Acq. ROW Release Possession
Rural versus Urban
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Time (Calendar Days)
Cum
ulat
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pro
ject
s th
at h
ave
R1
acqu
ired
befo
re th
e Ti
me
Ran
ge
Urban Projects (PAT) Rural Projects (PAT)
ROW Release
Urban (N = 42)
Rural (N = 151)
Cumulative % for ROW Acq.ROW Release Initial Appraisal
by # of ParcelsPlot of Cumulative Percentage vs. Time (Calendar Days)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 250 500 750 1000
Time (Calendar Days)
Cum
ulat
ive
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pro
ject
R3
valu
es (P
AT
- TPA
T)
10-30 Parcels per Project (R3) Greater than 30 Parcels per Project (R3)
ROW Release
10-30 Parcels (N = 103)
> 30 Parcels (N = 85)
Key Drivers: Critical Path Parcels
Summary of Delay Factors from Critical Path Parcels
Potential ROW Delay Factors
Percent of Total Parcels (count1 =
45)
(1) Owner: Pricing, compensation and impact dispute 44.4%(2) Owner: Title curative and ownership change 28.9%(3) Third party 26.7%(4) Parcel characteristics, owner initiated, improvement delays 20.0%
(5) Environmental sensitivity and expert witness delays 17.8%
(6) Legal activity causing delays 15.6%
Others: Utility, design change or revisions, terrain features dispute causing delays 24.5%
[1] Some Critical Path Parcels had multiple delays
ROW Key Findings• Projects with fewer parcels have faster
acquisition times• Projects with more parcels have more lag