Empowering our Youth for a Sustainable Society Climate Change in the Caribbean - what can we do? Charmaine Gomes Ph.D. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean Port – of – Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 4 August 2012
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Empowering our Youth for a Sustainable Society
Climate Change in the Caribbean- what can we do?
Charmaine Gomes Ph.D.
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean
Compiled by R.S. Bradley and J.A. Eddy based on J.T. Houghton et al., Climate Change: The IPCC Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990 and published in EarthQuest, vo. 1, 1991. Courtesy of Thomas Crowley.
So far in the past 18,000 years, the earth's temperature has risen
approximately 16 ° F and the sea level has risen 300 feet.
A schematic reconstruction (solid line) of mean global surface temperature through the last 100 million years, based on analyses of various marine and terrestrial deposits. The dashed-line extension is a prediction of future trends through the coming 400 years, based on the assumption of substantial utilization of the fossil fuel reservoir. The vertical line shows the approximate range of surface temperature in climate model predictions for a doubling of CO2 levels, at about 100 years in the future. Modified from T. J. Crowley, Journal of Climate, vol 3,
The Stern Review - Conclusions• If we don’t act, the overall costs and risks of CC will be
equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP per year;• If a wide range of risks and impacts is taken into
account, the estimates of damage could rise to 20% of GDP or more;
• Our actions now and over the coming decades could create risks of a disruption to economic and social activity, on a scale similar to those associated with the great wars and the economic depression of the 1st half of the 20th century;
• It would be difficult to reverse these changes;• The costs of stabilising the climate are significant but
manageable;• Delay would be dangerous and much more costly.
The Response - What can we do?• The costs of action – reducing GHG emissions can
amount to about 1% of GDP per year;
• The investment that takes place during the next 10 – 20 years would have a profound effect on the climate in the 2nd half of this century and the next;
• Response must be international;
• Must be based on a shared vision of long-term goals and agreement on frameworks that will accelerate action over the next decade;
• It must build on mutually reinforcing approaches at national, regional and international levels.
The Response - What can we do?..• Adaptation should be accelerated;
• Adaptation will cost tens of billions of dollars per year and will put pressure on already scarce resources but what of the costs of inaction?
• Need better information, improved planning and more climate-resilient crops and infrastructure;
• Central estimates of annual costs of achieving stabilisation between 500 and 550 ppm CO2 e are around 1% GDP; if we start to take strong action now;
• It would be difficult and costly to aim to stabilise at 450 ppm.
Final Conclusions• The evidence leads to a simple conclusion:
“the benefits of strong, early action considerably outweighs the costs”
• Other conclusions;• Ignoring climate change will eventually damage
economic growth.• Measures to help people to adapt are
essential.• The less mitigation we do now, the greater the
difficulty of continuing to adapt in the future.
Final Recommendation
• There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now