Top Banner
Dr. George Hurtt Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources & Department of Natural Resources & Institute for the Study of Earth, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space Oceans and Space University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Durham, NH 03824 [email protected] [email protected] November 6, 2003
14

Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Maya Saunders

Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources & Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 [email protected]. November 6, 2003. NAST 2001. IPCC 2001. IPCC 2001. Global C Budget (PgC/y). IPCC 2001. IPCC 1994. IPCC 2001. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Dr. George HurttDr. George Hurtt

Department of Natural Resources &Department of Natural Resources &

Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Spaceand Space

University of New HampshireUniversity of New Hampshire

Durham, NH 03824Durham, NH 03824

[email protected]@unh.edu

November 6, 2003

Page 2: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

NAST 2001

Page 3: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

IPCC 2001

Page 4: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

IPCC 2001

Page 5: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Global C Budget (PgC/y)Global C Budget (PgC/y)

1980s1980s 1990s1990s

Atm. IncreaseAtm. Increase 3.3+/-0.13.3+/-0.1 3.2+/-0.13.2+/-0.1

EmissionsEmissions 5.4+/-0.35.4+/-0.3 6.3+/-0.46.3+/-0.4

Ocean-Atm. FluxOcean-Atm. Flux -1.9+/-0.6-1.9+/-0.6 -1.7+/-0.5-1.7+/-0.5

Land-Atm. Flux*Land-Atm. Flux* -0.2+/-0.7-0.2+/-0.7 -1.4+/-0.7-1.4+/-0.7

*partitioned as *partitioned as followsfollows

Land UseLand Use 1.7(0.6-2.5)1.7(0.6-2.5) NANA

Residual Residual Terrestrial SinkTerrestrial Sink

-1.9(-3.8-0.3)-1.9(-3.8-0.3) NANA

IPCC 2001

Page 6: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &
Page 7: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

IPCC 1994

Page 8: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

IPCC 2001

Page 9: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Transport Numbers of RegionsModels 7 12 17

TM2

TM3

GCTMM

Pacala et al., 2001, Science, 292:2316-2320

Land-Based Range

}

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

1990-1994

I II III

Consistent land- and atmosphere- based U.S. carbon Consistent land- and atmosphere- based U.S. carbon sink estimates.sink estimates.

Category Low High

Forest Trees 0.11 0.15  Other Forest Organic Matter 0.03 0.15  

Cropland Soils 0.00 0.04  Woody Encroachment 0.12* 0.13*

 Wood Products 0.03 0.07  Reservoirs 0.01 0.04  

Exports Minus Imports 0.04 0.09  

Exported by Rivers 0.03 0.04

Apparent Sink Without WoodyEncroachment 0.25 0.58  

Apparent Sink 0.37 0.71

Sink 0.30 0.58

Page 10: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Projecting the Future of the U.S. Carbon SinkProjecting the Future of the U.S. Carbon Sink

Hurtt et al., 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(3):1389-1394

Page 11: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &
Page 12: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Cox et al., 2000, Nature 408:184-187

Coupled Earth System ModelsCoupled Earth System Models

Page 13: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Context for decision making with uncertainty

Kammen & Hassenzahl, 1999, Should We Risk It?, Princeton.

Page 14: Dr. George Hurtt Department of Natural Resources &

Kammen & Hassenzahl, 1999, Should We Risk It?, Princeton.

Context for decision making with uncertainty