Top Banner
Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010
18

Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Mar 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Darius Cordry
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Dr. Deanna SellnowUniversity of Kentucky

January 6, 2010

Page 2: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Introductions Action Research in a Nutshell Step by step process to … prepare

your proposal Wrap up and Evaluations

Page 3: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

2. One thing you enjoy about teaching at NWIC

3. One challenge in teaching students at NWIC

Page 4: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Goal: to improve (change) how we address issues or problems via vigorous inquiry and reflection (research) (Lewin, 1946)

Research Questions: Personal Organizational Societal(Reason & Bradbury,

2001)

Page 5: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

GOAL: To improve how we teach (pedagogy) based on rigorous inquiry & reflection (research)

WHY: To improve student learning

TO DO SO: We must understand our students

What’s in a name? SOTL: Scholarship of

Teaching and Learning Instructional

Communication Educational Assessment Scholarship of

Assessment

Page 6: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

1. Identify an issue/problem/difficulty in the classroom (RQ).

2. Come up with a research-based strategy for addressing it.

3. Do it. 4. Assess it. 5. Complete the feedback loop. 6. Write it up!

Page 7: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.
Page 8: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Examples: Public speaking:

anxiety/disclosure/gender bias online speech content

Teacher training: international TAs isolation course consistency/integrity

General: immediacy in online instruction unprepared students/don’t read for class student commitment (relevance/value) student engagement

Page 9: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Consumer Orientation

Entertainment Orientation

Techno-literate Instant Gratification Self-Interested Cynical Stressed Intellectually

disengaged Civility Issues Self-Efficacy Issues Negotiation

College Students Today

Page 10: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Teaching-Centered Lecture, discussion (student-teacher, student-

student, experiential

Curriculum-Centered Course materials, supplements, topics,

assignments Problem-based learning

Environment-Centered Online, face to face, in-class, out of class

Page 11: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Public speaking: Anxiety=Speech of Personal Significance Online=online course Speech content=problem-based learning

Teacher training: International TAs=BAT training Isolation=peer mentoring Course consistency/integrity=weekly meetings, intercoder

training, test creation round robins General:

Immediacy in online instruction=email and emoticon training

Unprepared students/don’t read for class=quizzes, questions

Student commitment (relevance/value)=service learning Student engagement=learning cycle lessons

Page 12: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Modify . . . Syllabus Lecture notes to lesson plans Assignments Assessment and evaluation tools

Page 13: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

≠ Evaluation Curriculum-Embedded Performance-based Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Rubrics Methods

Direct or indirect Qualitative or quantitative

Page 14: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Public speaking: Anxiety=Speech of Personal Sig-content analysis of speeches Online=online course=content analysis of speeches Speech content=problem-based learning=content analysis of

speeches Teacher training:

International TAs=BAT training=student and teacher questionnaires Isolation=peer mentoring=reflective papers and portfolios Course consistency/integrity=weekly meetings, intercoder training,

test creation round robins=portfolios General:

Immediacy in online instruction=email and emoticon training=student surveys

Unprepared students/don’t read for class=quizzes, questions=student surveys

Student commitment (relevance/value)=service learning=interviews, focus groups, content analysis of speeches, affective learning scale, content relevance scale

Student engagement=learning cycle lessons=test scores, content analysis of speeches, TCEs

Page 15: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Reflect on what worked, etc. and modify syllabus and pedagogy

Page 16: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Build an argument for what you did (research based)

Introduce RQ or H Describe the methods you used to

assess its utility Clarify results Offer a discussion that presents

conclusions, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research

Page 17: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Argument: Speech anxiety is lower when people know each other but men don’t like to disclose as much as women

RQ: Is there an inherent gender bias in requiring a self disclosure speech?

Methods: content analysis comparison of speeches and grades

Results: Topics and subpoints differed, grades did not

Discussion: It’s ok as long as students are free to choose the topic and examples they actually disclose

Page 18: Dr. Deanna Sellnow University of Kentucky January 6, 2010.

Put the final touches on your proposals! Onward and upward! Questions/ideas/thoughts?

[email protected]