Top Banner
DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College
60

DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Griselda Watson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOTMAPPING

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College

Page 2: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAPDEFINED

Page 3: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Dot Map

– Map in which point symbols of uniform size and value are used to emphasize a spatial pattern

Page 4: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Dot Map (cont.)

– Map in which point symbol frequency illustrates differences in magnitude of an attribute (variable)

Page 5: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Dot Map (cont.)

– Illustrates variations in spatial density

Page 6: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Dot Map (cont.)

– Can have many dots, or just a few

Page 7: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Each point symbol can represent

– One individual feature or phenomenon– Called a “Pin Map”

Each symbol represents a single golf course

Symbols are placed where features are actually located

Page 8: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Each point symbol can represent (cont.)

– Several features or phenomena– Called a “Dot Density Map”

Each symbol represents10,000 people

Symbols are not placed where features are actually located

Page 9: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Earliest dot map of population

– Frere de Montizon, France (1830)

Each dot represents 10,000 people

A milestone in thematic mapping that went unnoticed until the

20th century

Page 10: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• John Snow’s Dot Map (1854)

– Used to identify the Broad Street water pump, and halt a cholera epidemic

A classic example of the use of a thematic map in service of spatial analysis

The firstepidemiological map

Page 11: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Popular in US Government mapping of

agricultural data in the 1930s-1970s.

Page 12: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Advantages

– Can reflect spatial distributions more accurately than other thematic map types

Wheat Harvested in Kansas

Page 13: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Advantages

– Reveals non-uniform distributions within enumeration units

Page 14: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Advantages

– Allows the map user to recover original data by counting dots*

6 dots @ 750 each equals 4,500 people

*Actual value can be greater than the sum, up to the dot value

Page 15: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOT MAP DEFINED• Disadvantages

– Easy to create inaccurate dot maps, but difficult to produce accurate ones

– Can depict features as existing in locations where they can’t possibly exist

Do people live in lakes?

One dot represents

10,000 people

Page 16: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

MAP PROJECTIONSand the

DOT MAP

Page 17: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

MAP PROJECTIONS• Equivalent (Equal Area) projections are

most appropriate – Distortion of relative sizes of areas can

mislead the map user

EquivalentConformal

Page 18: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE ofPOINT SYMBOLS

on a PIN MAP

Page 19: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Point symbols need to be as prominent

as possible– Without obliterating everything else

Page 20: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Denser distributions require smaller

symbols– In order to limit symbol overlap

Page 21: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Less-dense distributions allow for

larger, more sophisticated symbols– Pictographic symbols

Page 22: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE ofPOINT SYMBOLS

on a DOT DENSITY MAP

Page 23: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Dots need to be as prominent as

possible– Without obliterating everything else

Page 24: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Dot size needs to be balanced with dot

value (unit value)

Each Dot Represents 8,000

People

Population, 2005

Page 25: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Dots should coalesce only in the most

dense areas– Coalescence means overlap

Each Dot Represents 8,000

People

Population, 2005

Page 26: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Dot size can be calculated using the

Nomograph– Nomograph is more relevant to traditional,

manual cartography– Trial-and-error is a better approach for

modern, GIS-based cartography

Page 27: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Here, dot value is OK, but size is

insufficient

Each Dot Represents 8,000

People

Population, 2005

Page 28: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Here, dot size is OK, but value is

excessive

Each Dot Represents 75,000

People

Population, 2005

Page 29: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

SIZE of POINT SYMBOLS• Here, dot size is balanced with dot

value – Dots are prominent, and coalesce

Each Dot Represents 8,000

People

Population, 2005

Page 30: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT ofPOINT SYMBOLS

on a PIN MAP

Page 31: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Symbols are placed where features or

phenomena are actually located

Symbols for point features are placed at the point

Symbols for areal features are typically placed in the

center of the area

Page 32: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• The exact location is sometimes

ambiguous…

Page 33: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT ofPOINT SYMBOLS

on a DOT DENSITY MAP

Page 34: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Symbols are allocated to smaller

enumeration units (counties) within a larger enumeration unit (state)

Cropland, 1997

Page 35: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Symbols are randomly distributed

within enumeration units – Counties here

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Page 36: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• An infinite number of random

distributions is possible– Random placement is not optimal!

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Page 37: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• ArcMap places symbols in a different

location every time the layer is redrawn – Good for experimentation– “Fixed” option prevents this

Page 38: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Symbols randomly distributed within

enumeration units

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Page 39: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Beware of unrealistic distributions!

– Does cropland exist in urban areas?– Do people live in reservoirs?

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Omaha-Council Bluffs

Page 40: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Incorporate Ancillary Attributes

– Ancillary = additional, or supportive– Used to prevent unrealistic dot placement

• Limiting ancillary attributes– Place absolute limits on where dots can be

located (no population on water bodies)

• Related ancillary attributes– Place restrictions on where dots can be

located (less population on steeper slopes)

Page 41: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• ArcMap allows you to specify limiting

ancillary attributes– Using the “Masking” option

Page 42: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Here, ancillary attributes are not used

– Cropland dots are unrealistically placed in urban areas

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Omaha-Council Bluffs

Page 43: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Here, the urban areas layer is used as

a limiting ancillary attribute

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Omaha-Council Bluffs

Page 44: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Ancillary attributes are often not shown

on the final map

Cropland, 1997

Each Dot Represents 5,000 Acres

Omaha-Council Bluffs

Page 45: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Multiple ancillary attributes can be

combined into a single map layer – Using the Union geoprocessing tool

Water and industrial areas are combined, and used to prevent the placement of “people” dots in water or industrial neighborhoods

L I M I T I N GA N C I L L A R Y

A T T R I B U T E S

Z O N E DI N D U S T R I A L

100 People

Page 46: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Limiting ancillary attributes can also be

derived from classified satellite imagery

Dots are placed only on yellow

pixels (cropland)

Page 47: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• There have traditionally been three

methods of distributing dots within enumeration units

– Uniform– Geographically Weighted– Geographically Based

Page 48: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Uniform Distribution

– Dots are placed manually to produce a uniform, but partly random, distribution

Boundaries of enumeration units

are implied

Page 49: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Geographically Weighted

– Dots are placed manually with attention paid to adjacent enumeration units

Dots are denser near enumeration units with higher overall

values

Boundaries of enumeration units are less apparent

Page 50: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Geographically Based

– Uniform, partly random distributions, limited by ancillary attributes

Boundaries of enumeration units are less apparent

Dots not placed in unrealistic locations

Page 51: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Computer-based methods of dot

placement are less flexible– Dots are placed within the constraints of

limiting ancillary attributes– Similar to traditional Geographically Based

Page 52: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

PLACEMENT of SYMBOLS• Computer-based methods of dot

placement are less flexible (cont.)– Dots are placed completely at random,

without any uniformity– Gives false impressions of density

Do lots of people really live here? Nobody lives here?

Page 53: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

RULES of THUMB for

DOT DENSITY MAPPING

Page 54: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

RULES OF THUMB• Use limiting ancillary attributes

– Reduces unrealistic placement of dots by limiting where they can be placed

• Use data from enumeration units that are smaller than your area of interest*

– Use counties or census tracts when mapping a state

– Census tracts or block groups when mapping a county

– Block groups when mapping a city, etc.

*Reduces false impressions of density resulting from random placement of dots

Page 55: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

RULES OF THUMB• Balance dot size with unit value

– Experiment until dots are clearly visible, not “too big,” and coalesce only in the most dense areas

Each Dot Represents 8,000 People

Population, 2005

Page 56: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN

Page 57: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Legends for pin and dot density maps

are typically very simple– A representative symbol and a definition– Legend headings are rarely required

Page 58: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• A legend is not required on some pin

maps– If symbol meaning is self evident

Page 59: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

LEGEND DESIGN• Include additional information if

necessary– Legend Heading– Total for entire area– Sample densities

Page 60: DOT MAPPING Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College.

DOTMAPPING

Cartographic Design for GIS (Geog. 340)Prof. Hugh HowardAmerican River College