Top Banner

Click here to load reader

DOE/SC CD-1 Review ... Project Project Project Project Project Project Submit approved CD or equivalent documents to APM SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 Allow expenditure of PED,

Aug 22, 2020

ReportDownload

Documents

others

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    DOE/SC CD-1 Review of the

    Integrated Engineering Research Center

    (IERC) Project

    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory February 7-9, 2017

    Ethan Merrill

    Committee Chair

    Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

    http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

    http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    2

    Deliverables – Due Dates

    • Closeout report (prepared in PowerPoint)

    • Presented Thursday, February 9

    • Instructions—slide 12

    • Template—slide 14

    • Final report draft (prepared in MS Word)

    • Due Monday, February 13 to Casey

    ([email protected])

    • Instructions—slide 13

    mailto:[email protected]

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    3

    DOE EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA

    Tuesday, February 7, 2017—Comitium (WH2SE)

    8:30 a.m. DOE Executive Session E. Merrill

    8:35 a.m. Program Perspective G. Brown

    8:45 a.m. Federal Project Director Perspective S. Neus

    8:55 a.m. Questions

    9:00 a.m. Adjourn

    DOE Executive Session

    Project and review information is available at:

    https://fermipoint.fnal.gov/organization/os/FESS/ierc/SitePages/CD-1%20IPR.aspx

    Username: IERC-CD1 Password: Fermilab2017

    https://fermipoint.fnal.gov/organization/os/FESS/ierc/SitePages/CD-1 IPR.aspx

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE Review Committee

    Participants

    4

    Ethan Merrill, DOE/SC, Chairperson

    Review Committee

    Subcommittee 1: Technical and ES&H

    *Marty Fallier, BNL

    Ben Maxwell, LBNL

    Bill Rainey, TJNAF

    Subcommittee 2: Cost and Schedule

    *Jerry Kao, DOE/ASO

    Jason Budd, ANL

    Subcommittee 3: Project Management

    *Steve Cannella, BNL Gary Bloom, ORNL

    *Lead

    Observers

    Stephanie Short, DOE/SC

    Gary Brown, DOE/SC

    Steve Neus, DOE/FSO

    Mike Fenn, DOE/PM

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    5

    CD-1

    Delegation Allowed

    S-4 SC-1 SC-1 SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD

    Approve Acquisition Strategy Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-1

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-1

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-2

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Approve Preliminary Project Execution Plan (PEP) S-4 Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-1

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-2

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Reviewed by SC-28

    Approved by SC-AD

    Appointment of the Federal Project Director (FPD) S-4 SC-1 SC-1 SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD

    Approve Integrated Project Team (IPT) S-4 SC-1 SC-2 SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD

    Develop a Risk Management Plan Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Comply with the One-for-One Building Space Replacement Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Complete a Conceptual Design Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Document High Perf. & Sustainable Bldg. & Sustainable

    Env. Stewardship considerations Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Conduct a Conceptual Design Review Team external to project Team external to project Team external to project Team external to project Team external to project Team external to project

    Complete a Conceptual Design Report Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Prepare a Preliminary Hazard Analysis Report Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab

    Develop and Implement an Integrated Safety Management

    Plan Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab

    Establish Preliminary Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab

    Identify general Safeguards and Security requirements for

    the recommended alternative Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab

    Complete National Environmental Policy Act

    (NEPA)Strategy by issuing a determination (i.e., EIS, EA) Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab Site Office or Lab

    Conduct Independent Project Review or External

    Independent Review

    ICE or ICR by PM

    & SC-28

    ICE or ICR by PM

    & SC-28

    ICE or ICR by APM

    with SC-28 SC-28

    SC-28

    Tailored

    SC-28

    Tailored

    Update PDS, or other funding documents for MIE and OE

    projects, and OMB 300s, if applicable. SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD

    Hazard Cat. 1,2,3 Nuclear Facility--Update Safety Design

    Strategy (SDS)

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    SBAA & FPD, w/ CNS or

    CDNS concurrence, as

    appropriate

    Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 nuclear facilities, conduct an

    Independent Project Review (IPR) PSO PSO PSO PSO PSO PSO

    Hazard Cat. 1,2,3 Nuclear Facility--Prepare a Conceptual

    Safety Design Report (CSDR) SBAA via the CSVR SBAA via the CSVR SBAA via the CSVR SBAA via the CSVR SBAA via the CSVR SBAA via the CSVR

    Hazard Cat. 1,2,3 Nuclear Facility--Prepare Conceptual

    Safety Validation Report (CSVR) SBAA SBAA SBAA SBAA SBAA SBAA

    Hazard Cat. 1,2,3 Nuclear Facility--Initiate a Code of

    Record Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Submit approved CD or equivalent documents to APM SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28 SC-28

    Allow expenditure of PED, MIE OR OE funds for project

    design. Project Project Project Project Project Project

    Submit budget request for the remainder of TPC if CD-2 is

    approved w/i 1 year of OMB submission SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD SC-AD

    Update PARS II with monthly status Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Prog. Mgr. & FPD

    No Earned Value (EV)

    Continue with Monthly or Quarterly Project

    Reporting/Meeting

    SC-AD

    Invite SC-1 and SC-28

    SC-AD

    Invite SC-1 and SC-28

    SC-AD

    Invite SC-2 and SC-28 SC-AD to invite SC-28 SC-AD to invite SC-28 SC-AD to invite SC-28

    Develop an Acquisition Plan if applicable

    Hazard Cat. 1,2,3 Nuclear Facility--Develop a Checkout,

    Testing & Commissioning Plan Project Project Project Project Project Project

    P O

    S T

    C D

    -1

    CD-1--APPROVE ALTERNATIVE SELECTION AND

    COST RANGE

    P R

    IO R

    T O

    C D

    -1 --

    C O

    N C

    E P

    T U

    A L

    D E

    S IG

    N

    TOTAL PROJECT COST (TPC) $750M or more Less than $750M to $400M Less than $400M to $100M Less than $100M to $50M* Less than $50M* to $20M Less than $20M to $10M**

    DECISION / REQUIREMENTS1 / APPROVAL2

    N u

    cl e

    a r

    F a

    ci li

    ty N

    u cl

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    6

    SC Organization

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    7

    Charge Questions

    1. Have performance requirements been appropriately and sufficiently defined for this stage of

    the project?

    2. Has a credible and sufficient alternatives analysis been performed? Are project risks identified

    and has a credible Risk Management Plan been developed?

    3. Are the estimated cost and schedule ranges supporting the most likely alternatives credible and

    realistic for this stage of the project? Are scope, cost, and schedule contingency amounts

    adequate? Are there sufficient scope trade-offs and building attributes to be provided to the

    building designers to accommodate either bids greater than the estimate or less than the

    estimate?

    4. Is the project being appropriately managed? Is the Integrated Project Team established and

    functioning?

    5. Are environment, safety and health aspects being properly addressed given the project’s

    current stage of development? Are Integrated Safety Management principles being followed?

    6. Are project documents (e.g., Acquisition Strategy, Preliminary Project Execution Plan, and

    Preliminary Hazard Analysis Report) complete and ready for approval? Is the project ready

    for CD-1?

  • OFFICE OF

    SCIENCE

    8

    Agenda

    Tuesday, February 7, 2017—Comitium (WH2SE)

    8:30 am DOE Full Committee Executive Se