Top Banner
Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I Dissection alter true lumen geomery downstream? W Harmse, J Appoo, E Herget, N Merchant, J Wong, M Ferris, A Gregory University of Calgary CCC Vancouver Oct 27, 2014
19

Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Jul 07, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I Dissection alter true lumen geomery downstream?

W Harmse, J Appoo, E Herget, N Merchant, J Wong, M Ferris, A Gregory

University of Calgary

CCC VancouverOct 27, 2014

Page 2: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Background

Debakey Type 1 Dissections involve the Ascending, Descending and Abdominal Aorta

Collapsed (small) true lumen distally is thought to be a risk factor:

acutely malperfusionlong term aneurysm formation

Page 3: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Open distal anastomosis (Hemi-Arch) current gold standard for arch management in acute Debakey Type 1 Dissection

Page 4: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

What happens to the TL in the descending aorta after “Hemi-Arch” anastomosis for acute Debakey Type 1 Dissection?

Objective:

Page 5: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Retrospective review of acute Type A Aortic Dissections at a single tertiary care centre from 2006 -2013

Identified 128 Stanford Type A Dissections

Methods

Page 6: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Inclusion Criteria:DeBakey Type I Aortic DissectionsOpen surgery with sternotomy, hemiarch replacement under circulatory arrest +/- root replacement

Exclusion CriteriaIncomplete pre-op and post-op CT imagingDeBakey Type 2 DissectionIMHHybrid/Total Arch Repairs

Page 7: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Methods

TeraRecon® multiplanar reconstruction software to obtain true short axis view

Preoperative and First postoperative studies

Measurement of cross sectional area of true and false lumen of descending aorta at three levels:

Left subclavian arteryPulmonary artery bifurcationDiaphragmatic hiatus

Page 8: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Methods

Manually trace outline of TL & FL

NB: Most aortic studies are based on max diameter

Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta

Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible

Page 9: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients
Page 10: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

128 patients underwent operative repair.

Inclusion criteria met by 45 patients (34 males and 11 females)

Mean age: 56 (range 26-79).

Median interval between scans was 11 days.

Results

Page 11: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Descending aortaProximal Mid Distal Average

True lumen(cm2)

True:Total ratio

True lumen(cm2)

True:Total ratio

True lumen(cm2)

True:Total ratio

True lumen(cm2)

True:Total ratio

Pre-op 3.24 (1.44-4.94)

0.47 (0.07-0.72)

2.31 (0.57-4.41)

0.32 (0.10-0.58)

1.81 (0.44-4.25)

0.32 (0.09-1.00)

2.43 (0.98-4.25)

0.36 (0.13-0.62)

Post-op 3.57 (1.58-5.90)

0.51 (0.07-1.00)

2.54 (0.82-5.52)

0.32 (0.09-1.00)

2.11 (0.45-4.25)

0.33 (0.05-1.00)

2.70 (0.82-4.90)

0.38 (0.09-0.79)

Change in % 15% (-19 – 142)

13% (-38 – 208)

23% (-61 – 300)

13% (-63 – 365)

37% (-74 – 227)

21% (-72 – 197)

25% (-47 – 146)

9% (-49 – 121)

Page 12: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

55.6%

44.4%

50.0% 50.0%

64.4%

35.6%

53.3%

46.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Decrease Increase

Perc

enta

ge o

f pat

ient

s

Change in true:total lumen ratio

Combined

Sub-clavian artery level

Pulmonary artery level

Diaphragm level

Page 13: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Improvement group: average increase 42% (median 35%, range: 3%- 121%)

Worsening group: average decrease was 18%(median 17%, range 49% - 2%)

Page 14: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

• Pre-op scan shows false lumen at PA and diaphragm levels.

• Post-op sca

Pre-op Post-op

Page 15: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Pre-op Post-op

Page 16: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Conclusions

Standard surgical repair in patients with acute De Bakey type I dissection has a variable effect on size of residual true & false lumens in descending thoracic aorta.

TL size increases about half the time

These findings are in keeping with some of limited clinical literature looking at resolution of distal malperfusion post surgery for Debakey Type I Dissection

Page 17: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Clinical Implication

When distal malperfusion is suspected clinically or radiologically, consideration should be given for more extensive arch and descending aortic intervention

Further research is required to understand if adjunctive surgical strategies to expand the true lumen distally will mitigate long term complications

Page 18: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Identify site of primary intimal tear-patients with decrease in TL area post op may have had distal tears…

Clinical & Radiologic follow up in group that TL size decreased- did they go on to form aneurysms….?

Next Steps

Page 19: Does standard surgical repair of Debakey Type I …...Not dependable due to irregular shapes of lumen in dissected aorta Cross sectional area more accurate and reproducible 128 patients

Thank You