5
5.4 Arhitectura si fenomenele electrice si magnetice.Institutul
Central de Biologie, 1985
"Minunea apei" din piramida de la Piteti
La civa pai de centura oraului Piteti, n localitatea Prundu, se
poate zri de la deprtare ceva ce seamn cu o ser. Un schelet de
metal mbrcat cu geamuri de sticl, numai c are form de piramid. Cine
ar construi o ser n form de piramid?
Ideea a venit Mrioarei Glodeanu, un inginer romn nc n
activitate, nsrcinat n anii 80 cu construirea unei staii de epurare
biologice, pentru ape reziduale. Staia lui Glodeanu folosea, pentru
filtrare, nufrul egiptean, planta capabil s fixeze sedimentele.
Biomasa rezultat era destinat ngrsrii pmnturilor de la Albota, o
comun din judeul Arge.
Mrioara Godeanu, efa unui colectiv de la Institutul Central de
Biologie, a folosit ns piramid i pentru alte experimente. Pasionat
de piramide, ea a studiat influena acestora asupra creterii
plantelor i, potrivit unor mrturii, ar fi folosit piramida pentru
unele cercetri n domeniul farmaceutic.
Godeanu locuiete acum la Petroani, unde este angajata unui
institut privat de cercetare. ntr-unul dintre puinele interviuri
acordate presei, Mrioara Godeanu spunea:
"Am fost ajutat de doi ingineri arhiteci, care au realizat
planurile la scara 1:10 fa de piramida lui Keops, respectnd toi
parametrii piramidei din Egipt. Cu toate c ulterior ni s-au pus
multe piedici, am fost mirat s constat c am fost sprijinit n acea
perioad de o serie de personaliti din domeniul politic, oameni
foarte pasionai n intimitatea lor de asemenea domenii de cunoatere.
Piramida a fost terminat cu bine n 1985.Oficial, ea a fost
construit ca staie-pilot de urmrire a aciunii unor organisme (alge,
bacterii) asupra apelor uzate, pentru purificarea lor. S-au fcut i
multe studii privind fenomenele de cristalizare, de polimerizare a
rinilor, studii de germinare rapid, de accelerare a proceselor de
cretere. Dar adevrata noastr btlie cu instalaia de la Piteti a fost
pentru a demonstra efectul de form (al piramidei) asupra apei. n
piramid, apa se energizeaz i ajunge s fie o ap primar, cum sunt
apele plate, necontaminate".
The Ecumenical Chapel by AOA Architects Branches Out to
AllPublished: Mar 4, 11 References: aoa.fi and blog.reflexdeco.fr
The presence or absence of spirituality should not affect the way
one perceives the ethereal beauty of the Ecumenical Chapel by AOA
Architects. The sanctuarys structure is sculpted into a series of
triangular prisms, hollowed out to to an otherwise windowless cave,
but endowed with a brilliant arboreal window.Taking inspiration
from religions origins in nature, this V-shaped church mimics
primitive building methods and the use of untamed trees in
architecture. The temples intricate trunk and bough fenestration
also reinvents the classic stain-glassed windows found in
cathedrals from the Middle Ages onwards. As a whole package, the
Ecumenical Chapel by AOA Architects has its roots in bringing
together people of all sects of Christianity, making this
immaculate project an all-embracing entity.
Architecture With Extreme Safety Measures Built-InPublished: Jan
30, 10 References: korvelo and homeqn If the movie 2012 makes you
afraid, if you are concerned about disasters in an apocalyptic
situation, if you live in a tsunami-prone landscape, or if you have
a paranoid mental disorder, you may be interested in super
protective housing from Korvelo.According to Korvelo, the ultimate
safe house may be a pyramid. The fully-appointed 5,000-square-foot
home has 5 bedrooms, 6 baths, 3 garages, 4 cameras and 4 weapons
stations. Construction can be concrete or steel or some combination
of the two. No worries about drive-by shootings herethe structure,
including the windows, is bulletproof.If a pyramid isnt to your
liking, check out the dome, castle, or sphere.
Vesica Piscis TempleHouse
Vesica Piscis Temple HouseThis is a living house built of
saplings, thatch, and earth. It focuses and resonates all of the
natural energies and generates a bio-energetic healing force . It
derives its proportions from Stonehenge, the Giza Pyramid, and the
Earth and Moon dimensions. It blends the Chakras, (the bodys energy
centers), the I Ching ( the Chinese oracle Book of Changes), cosmic
etheric energy, underground streams, sun, wind, water, earth, and
fire.
5.1 Arhitectura si fenomenele acustice
Henning Larsen Architects wins invited competition for campus in
Roskilde, DenmarkDanish architecture firm Henning Larsen have just
won another competition. This time for the Campus Roskilde at the
University College Sealand.
click image to enlargeWith the new Campus Roskilde, University
College Sealand consolidates its professional bachelors programmes
covering social education and social work, health and teaching.
PROJECT DETAILSLocation: Roskilde, DenmarkClient: University
College SealandGross floor area: 14,000 m2Year of construction:
2010 2012Type of assignment: First prize in international
competitionCollaboration: Enemrke og Pedersen, Cowi and Thing &
Wain Landscape Architects.HLA TEAMPARTNER IN CHARGE: Peer Teglgaard
JeppesenPROJECT LEADER: Michael Soerensen and Viggo HaremstPROJECT
MANAGER: Jesper HoibergENERGY CONSULTANT: Michael JoergensenPROJECT
TEAM: Sofie Hedin, Andreas Brink, Erik Folke Holm, Emil Skibsted,
Greta Lillienau, Blanca Ulzurrun, Ida Bergstrm3D VISULIZATION:
Peter Krogtoft/HLA VisualsThe new campus will facilitate dialogue
and random meetings and provide the students with a feeling of
being part of a manifold university environment beating with one
pulse.Campus Roskilde will consist of four square buildings
slightly rotated towards each other to shield the area from the
motorway and create a more intimate, varied space around the campus
square. In this way, a new meeting place is created between the
urban quarter of Trekroner and the green areas around RUC. Under
the overhang of the main building, a roofed square will open up to
the rest of the campus area and create life and a sense of
community among the students.Campus Roskilde is characterised by a
significant green profile where the rotated position of the
buildings will help optimise the energy consumption and makes the
buildings adaptable to possible extensions in the future. Henning
Larsen
Noise Reduction
Axonometric view of Organization
Site Plan
Entrance Level Plan
Marine Research Center in Bali by Solus4
Fake Hills Megastructure By MAD Architects
It will be enough to hear whats the name of the company that has
designed this project and youll realize how incredible this really
is.Chinese architecture company MAD Architects has created a
conceptual design of a housing complex that should be eventually
built in Beihai. The key feature of this incredible megastructure
is that it just looks like a few of hills brought together.
The project is named Fake Hills and designers are claiming that
it will significantly reduce consumption of energy by allowing
natural air and light to filter through the construction.As you can
see from photos, it is planned to put in a few of botanical gardens
inside this complex. Lets just hope that the designers will find
company that is strong enough to ensure financial backup for this
colossal complex which, if it was built, will become one of the
main touristic attractions in China.
Noise Reducing Walls, Copenhagen Airport
Due to the government requirements concerning noise reduction,
Copenhagen Airports has erected a new noise reduction wall between
the west office building and the new domestic terminal. A wall of
steel and glass was designed at first but it was later converted
into an integrated 310 meter long gangway with ISC as client
consultants.
The original designed steel and glass wall was shaped as a
curved lattice shell steel structure covered with glass to obtain
the noise reducing effect. The wall cross section is made up from
two opposing curved lattice shells that resemble the shape of an
airplane wing. Each of the curved lattice steel shells is built up
using rectangular hollow sections in a rectangular mesh pattern at
a 45 degree angle to horizontal level.
Statically the wall is fixed at ground level to a pile supported
concrete foundation. The two curved faces interact structurally by
transferring bending and shear forces by moment carrying transverse
rods.
The unique joint systems Space-X developed by ISC, which also
was been used successfully on the space lattice construction above
the Tivoli shopping arcade at the airport, was recommended for
assembling the steel joints. The completely invisible steel joints
combine maximum structural strength and effectiveness integrated in
the profiles giving no hints whatsoever of bolts and knots.
Noise AttenuationYour Path: EastLink > Environmental Mgt >
Noise Attenuation Noise Attenuation on EastLinkThe Victorian
Government requires that ConnectEast achieves noise attenuation of
63dB(A)L10(18hr) for residential buildings along EastLink, which is
consistent with the VicRoads Traffic Noise Reduction Policy.This
requirementis set out in the EastLink Concession Deed and
ConnectEast has invested many millions of dollars constructing
noise walls and mounds along the length of EastLink to meet the
requirements. More than 13,000 noise wall panels, ranging in height
from three to eleven metres, have been installed along the length
of EastLink. Acoustic specialists undertook extensive noise
modelling and testing to determine the location and height of noise
barriers. The height of noise walls is influenced by a number of
factors, including: Road design (height, width, depth of cuttings
etc) Traffic volume and vehicle type Speed limit Distance to nearby
buildings Ground topography In most instances, barriers are placed
as close to the motorway as possible to minimise the impact of
traffic noise on residential areas. Types of Noise Barriers Noise
barriers adhere to the overall visual themes for EastLink which are
based on elements of the natural environment along the motorways
alignment. These themes were previously applied to the
award-winning noise walls built for the Eastern Freeway extension.
Four types of noise barriers have been incorporated into EastLinks
distinctive urban design: Pre-cast concrete panels The concrete
panels comprise two typesa fractured pattern and a rock textured
pattern in either a charcoal-pigmented concrete or off-white
pigmented concrete. Acrylic Transparent acrylic panels have been
installed on bridges with smaller sheets of acrylic installed in
concrete and acrylic composite noise walls. Orange and green
acrylic panels have been used on bridges and interchanges. Earth
mounds (limited use) In a small number of areas where there is
sufficient space, landscaped earth mounds were used instead of
concrete walls. Earth mounds provide the same level of noise
reduction as walls. The Freeway Reserve EastLink has been
constructed along an established freeway reserve in Melbournes east
and south-east. The reserve was clearly detailed in Melways map
directories for around 40 years before construction began. This
reserve minimised the number of houses that had to be acquired to
make way for the motorway and also provided prospective purchasers
of properties adjacent to the reserve with notice that it was the
site for a major road in the future. Noise Monitoring Following the
opening of EastLink, independent consultants Bassett Acoustics
undertook a program of noise monitoring in representative locations
along the alignment to measure the actual noise levels being
experienced by residents. The purpose of the monitoring is to
verify the effectiveness of the noise walls and mounds constructed
along EastLink in accordance with the extensive modelling and
testing undertaken prior to construction. The noise monitoring was
undertaken more than three months after the opening of EastLink to
allow adequate time for driving patterns to become established.
Traffic Noise Criteria The EastLink Concession Deed specifies the
following performance criteria in relation to traffic noise: Road
Section Performance Criteria
Category A Buildings1 Category B Buildings2
Eastlink General 63 dB(A) L10,18hr63 dB(A) L10,12hr
Local Roads including: Ringwood Bypass East of Ringwood Street
Monash Freeway Mornington Peninsula Freeway Frankston Freeway 63
dB(A) L10,18hr where noise levels after the commencement date will
exceed 68 dB(A) L10,18hr without additional acoustic treatment. 63
dB(A) L10,12hr where noise levels after the commencement date will
exceed 68 dB(A) L10,12hr without additional acoustic treatment.
Within All Other Local Road Interchanges The greater of: 63
dB(A) L10,18hr or no more than 2 dB(A) higher than the L10,18hr
traffic noise level that would have prevailed if the road
improvements had not occurred. The greater of: 63 dB(A) L10,12hr or
no more than 2 dB(A) higher than the L10,12hr traffic noise level
that would have prevailed if the road improvements had not
occurred.
Notes: 1 Category A Buildings are defined as residential
dwellings, aged persons homes, hospitals, motels, caravan parks and
other buildings of a residential nature. 2 Category B Buildings are
defined as schools, kindergartens libraries and other
noise-sensitive community buildings. Noise Monitoring Methodology
Noise levels due to traffic on Eastlink were measured at
representative locations along the road corridor between Donvale
and Frankston, during the period from the 10 October until the 4
December 2008. An environmental noise logger was set up at each
measurement location in general accordance with the procedures
prescribed by VicRoads Requirements for Acoustic Consultants. The
procedures require the microphone to be positioned outside a
building, at a distance of one metre from the most exposed window
to a habitable room on the lowest level of the dwelling. At each
location, the measurements were performed for a period of nominally
one week in terms of hourly A-weighted L10, L90, Leq and Lmax Sound
Pressure Level. The noise measurement locations were selected based
on the following objectives: Where the predicted noise level is
close to the project criteria; Across a range of locations where
different traffic noise model variables are introduced; At
locations which are representative of where residents have raised
concerns; At locations where the three different project criteria
are applicable; Where different noise walls and barrier types are
encountered; and, Visual inspection following a drive through.
Results The results of the noise monitoring undertaken by
independent consultants Bassett Acoustics indicate that the
operational traffic noise levels comply with criteria specified in
the EastLink Concession Deed and validate the noise model for the
Eastlink project. The maximum dB(A) L10 (18 hr) noise level
measured along EastLink during the noise monitoring was 55dB(A) L10
(18 hr). This is well below the limit of 63 dB(A) L10 (18 hr) as
specified in the EastLink Concession Deed. Truck Noise ConnectEast
acknowledges the concerns of some local residents, particularly
located in suburbs close to the EastLink tunnels regarding the
noise associated with trucks braking and accelerating. In response,
signs advising trucks to limit the use of engine brakes have been
installed on the approach to both the Melba and Mullum Mullum
tunnels. We also continue to work with the trucking industry to
raise awareness about local resident concerns and to encourage
consideration regarding the use of engine brakes. In December 2008
in the Victorian Freight Network Strategy, Freight Futures, the
Victorian Government addressed the issue of reducing engine brake
noise: Reducing the noise coming from trucks and trains remains a
concern for many communities in Victoria. While it is particularly
an issue in urban areas, where residential, business and
recreational land uses abut transport corridors, it is also a major
issue in rural areas and regional cities. Indeed, truck noise is an
issue in many smaller towns in regional Victoria where major
highways are also the towns main street. Considerable progress has
been made in recent years to reduce the noise emanating from truck
engines. While some newer trucks are much more powerful and in some
cases larger, the adoption of new engine technology, exhaust
technology and engine encapsulation has delivered significant
reductions in noise. However, engine brake noise remains a problem
that needs to be addressed. Auxiliary brakes, including engine
brakes, are important safety equipment in trucks. Effective
auxiliary brakes are especially important to reduce the load on
service brakes on a steep descent. Some engine brakes are noisy and
the bark characteristic of the noise is offensive, especially at
night. Australian Design Rule 83/00 regulates drive-by noise for
new truck models manufactured after 2004 and any new vehicle from
2007/08. However, until recently, no regulation or associated
enforcement technology has been available to eliminate the use of
noisy engine brakes. To address the noise issue, Victoria has been
proactive in promoting the responsible use of engine brakes and
encouraging operators to adopt quieter engine brakes, or better
muffling, to limit noise. Victoria has also actively contributed to
work on national reforms that aim to find a regulatory solution to
this issue. National regulations have recently been developed and
agreed by Australias Transport Ministers. Victoria will work with
industry to adopt these model regulations and deploy the necessary
equipment and resources to enforce them effectively. These
regulatory and enforcement measures, combined with ongoing
awareness efforts in partnership with industry, will seek to reduce
the input of noisy truck engine brakes in communities. ConnectEast
fully supports the Governments position and has written to the
Minister for Roads and Ports and offered to work with VicRoads in
their efforts to minimise the impact of engine brakes on Victorian
communities. GlossarydB(A) means A-weighted Decibels, the unit of
Sound Pressure Level. The A-weighting adjusts the levels of
frequencies within the sound spectrum to better reflect the
sensitivity of the human ear to different frequencies. L10,1hr
means the value of A-weighted Sound Pressure Level which is
exceeded for 10 percent time during a one hour measurement period
[dB(A)]. L10,12hr means the arithmetic average of the hourly
L10,1hr Sound Pressure Levels measured between 6am and 6pm [dB(A)].
L10,18hr means the arithmetic average of the L10,1hr Sound Pressure
Levels measured between 6am and midnight [dB(A)]. Sound Pressure
Level is a measure of the magnitude of a sound wave (Unit:
Decibels). Mathematically, it is twenty times the logarithm to the
base ten of the ratio of the root mean square sound pressure at a
point in a sound field, to the reference sound pressure; where
sound pressure is defined as the alternating component of the
pressure (Pa) at the point, and the reference sound pressure is
2x105 Pa.
5.2 Arhitectura si fenomenele mecanice(arhitectura si
matematica)Perfect buildings: the maths of modern architectureby
Marianne Freiberger
Architecture has in the past done great things for geometry.
Together with the need to measure the land they lived on, it was
people's need to build their buildings that caused them to first
investigate the theory of form and shape. But today, 4500 years
after the great pyramids were built in Egypt, what can mathematics
do for architecture? At last year's Bridges conference, which
explored the connections between maths and art and design, Plus met
up with two architects of the Foster + Partners Specialist
Modelling Group, Brady Peters and Xavier De Kestelier, to cast a
mathematical eye over their work.
The London City Hall on the river Thames. Note the giant
helicalstair case inside. Image Foster + Partners.Foster + Partners
is an internationally renowned studio for architecture led by
Norman Foster and a group of senior partners. It has created
landmarks like 30 St Mary Axe in London (also known as the
Gherkin), London City Hall and the Great Court at the British
Museum. Ongoing projects include one of the biggest construction
projects on the planet, Beijing International Airport, as well as
the courtyard of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC and
the new Wembley Stadium in London.Many of Foster + Partners'
projects have one thing in common: they are huge. This means
maximal impact on their environment and its people. Designing such
enormities is a delicate balancing act. A building not only needs
to be structurally sound and aesthetically pleasing, it also has to
comply with planning regulations, bow to budget constraints,
optimally fit its purpose and maximise energy efficiency. The
design process boils down to a complex optimisation problem. It's
in the way this problem is solved that modern architecture differs
most from that of the ancient Egyptians: advanced digital tools can
analyse and integrate the bewildering array of constraints to find
optimal solutions. Maths describes the shapes of the structures to
be built, the physical features that have to be understood and it
is the language of computers, and so it forms the basis for every
step of the modelling process.The Specialist Modelling GroupThe
Foster + Partners Specialist Modelling Group (SMG), of which De
Kestelier and Peters are members, was set up in 1997. The SMG's job
is to help architects create virtual models of their project.
"Usually a team come to us with a concept," says De Kestelier,
"that could be anything from a sketch to something already quite
developed. We then help them to model it using CAD (computer aided
design) tools, or we develop tools for them."
Mathematical surfaces populated with panels. Image courtesy
Brady Peters.With the help of computers you can model pretty much
every aspect of a building, from its physics to its appearance.
Computer models can simulate the way the wind blows around the
building or sound waves bounce around inside it. Graphic programs
can explore different mathematical surfaces and populate them with
panels of different textures. And all the information you get from
these models can be pulled together in what is probably the most
important innovation in architectural CAD tools in recent years:
parametric modelling.
An architect's model of 30 St Mary Axe. Image Foster +
Partners.Parametric modelling has been around since the 1960s, but
only now are architects fully exploiting its power. The models
allow you to play around with certain features of a building
without having to re-calculate all the other features that are
affected by the changes you make. This makes them extremely
powerful design tools. Take the Gherkin shown on the left as an
example. If you decided to make the building slightly slimmer, this
would have a knock-on effect on some other features. You'd have to
re-calculate its out-lining curves and the angles of its diamond
shapes, for example. This is quite a lot of work and even when it's
done, you'd still have to draw a new sketch, either by hand or by
re-programming your computer.Parametric models do all this for you.
They allow you to change a variety of geometrical features while
keeping fixed those features you have decided should not change.
The models function a bit like spreadsheets: changing a feature of
the building is like changing an entry of the spreadsheet. In
response to a change the software regenerates the model so that
pre-determined relationships are maintained, just like a
spreadsheet re-calculates all of its entries.Equipped with the
digital tools provided by the SMG, a design team can explore a huge
range of design options in a very short period of time. The team
can change geometric features of a building and see how the change
affects, say, aerodynamic or acoustic properties. They can explore
how complex shapes that are hard to build can be broken down into
simpler ones, and they can quickly calculate how much material is
needed to estimate the cost. The results are buildings that would
have been impossible only a few decades ago, both because their
complex shapes were next to impossible to construct and because of
the degree to which they exploit science to interact optimally with
their environment.The GherkinThe Gherkin is one of the projects the
SMG was involved with and is a prime example of how geometry was
chosen to satisfy constraints. Going by the official name of 30 St
Mary Axe, the building is 180 metres tall, three times the height
of the Niagara Falls. There are three main features that make it
stand out from most other sky-scrapers: it's round rather than
square, it bulges in the middle and tapers to a thin end towards
the top, and it's based on a spiralling design. All these could
easily be taken as purely aesthetic features, yet they all cater to
specific constraints.A major problem with buildings of the
Gherkin's size is that air currents sweeping around them create
whirlwinds at their base, making their immediate vicinity an
uncomfortable place to be. To address this problem, the SMG advised
the architects to use computer models which, based on the
mathematics of turbulence, simulate a building's aerodynamic
properties. The model showed that a cylindrical shape responds
better to air currents than a square one and reduces whirlwinds.
The fact that the tower bulges out in the middle, reaching its
maximal diameter at the 16th floor, also helps to minimise winds at
its slimmer base.
A model of air currents flowing around the Gherkin. Image Foster
+ Partners.But even if you're not being ruffled by strong winds,
standing next to a sky-scraper can be eery. It dwarfs you, it
eclipses shorter buildings and it takes away the sunlight. Again,
it's the Gherkin's distinctive shape that helps minimise these
effects. Its bulging middle and its tapered top ensure that you
never see its top from below, thus not making you feel quite as
small. And the Sun and other views still have a chance to peep
through to the bottom.
The Gherkin's floor plan. Image Foster + Partners.One thing that
was decided at the outset was that the Gherkin should be as
sustainable a building as possible, and this meant choosing a shape
that maximises natural air ventilation (to save on
air-conditioning) and the influx of natural sunlight (to save on
heating and lighting bills). Six triangular wedges were cut out of
the circular plan of each floor, penetrating deep into the
building's interior. These serve as light wells, and the shafts
they create increase natural ventilation. However, the wedges do
not sit right on top of each other. Aerodynamic modelling showed
that ventilation is maximised if the plan of one floor is rotated
by several degrees with respect to the one below. Thus, the shafts
the wedges create spiral up the building and interact optimally
with the air currents caused by the building's outward shape.
Windows in the facade of the wedges open automatically and draw
fresh air into the building. As a result of this carefully chosen
geometry, the building reportedly uses 50% less energy than others
of comparable size.
The inside of the Gherkin. Triangular wedges have been cut out
of its floor plan. They serve as light wells and increase air
circulation. Image Foster + Partners.The London City HallThe London
City Hall houses the Mayor of London, the London Assembly and the
Greater London Authority. The use of glass and a giant helical
staircase in the interior are supposed to symbolise the
transparency and the accessibility of the democratic process. What
is most striking when looking from the outside, though, is the
building's odd shape.
The London City Hall on the river Thames.Perched on the banks of
the river Thames, the building is reminiscent of a river pebble,
with its roundness again hinting at the democratic ideal. But as
with the Gherkin, the shape was not only chosen for its looks, but
also to maximise energy efficiency. One way of doing this is to
minimise the surface area of the building, so that unwanted heat
loss or gain can be prevented. As the mathematicians amongst you
will know, of all solid shapes, the sphere has the least surface
area compared to volume. This is why the London City Hall has a
near-spherical shape.The building's lopsidedness is also conducive
to energy efficiency: the overhang on the South side ensures that
windows here are shaded by the floor above, thus reducing the need
for cooling in the summer. As with the Gherkin, computer modelling
showed how air currents move through the building and the geometry
within the building was chosen to maximise natural ventilation. In
fact, the building does not require any cooling at all and
reportedly uses only a quarter of the energy of comparable office
spaces.Even the helical staircase was not chosen for entirely
aesthetic reasons. As part of their analysis, the SMG modelled the
lobby's acoustics, quite appropriately for a building representing
the voice of the people. Initially the acoustics were terrible with
echoes bouncing around the large hall. Something was needed to
break up the space. One of Foster + Partners' past projects
provided a clue: the Reichstag in Berlin also contains a large
hall, but in this case it is broken up by a large spiral ramp. The
SMG created a model of a similar spiral staircase for the London
City Hall and the company Arup Acoustics analysed the acoustics for
this new model. As you can see in the animation below, sound is
trapped behind the staircase and echoes are reduced, so the idea
was adopted in the final design. (Animation Arup Acoustics.)
Floating Architecture Rising sea levels, flooding wetlands and
the desire to attract more tourists is giving rise to numerous
examples of floating architecture. Floating hotels, resorts,
apartment complexes, spas and even golf courses are being built at
different places around the world, from London, Amsterdam and Qatar
to the Maldives and Cambodia. Elitechoice lists out some of the
most luxurious floating marvels from around the world.1. Type:
Floating HotelWhere: London
As the London 2012 Summer Olympics approaches, we hear that
floating hotels along the Thames River could be the answer to
upcoming lodging issues as visitors stream in for the sporting
gala. According to reports, at least three cruise liners docked on
the Thames will offer lodging options to visitors during the three
weeks of the Summer Olympics. These floating hotels will dock at a
distance of three miles from Olympic Park in Stratford. So getting
around should not be a problem for guests onboard these hotels.2.
Type: Floating ResortWhere: QatarConstruction cost: $500
million
The Amphibious 1000 project is Qatars attempt to create a
floating resort that will feature underwater rooms. Italian
architecture firm Giancarlo Zema Design Group has offered a giant
octopus-like design with four large luxury hotels, and among other
things, an interactive marine life museum. The venue for this
unique and ambitious project is a marine reserve. Among the
striking design elements of this piece of floating architecture are
the numerous four-floored jellyfish pods that house a lounge and an
underwater observatory.3. Type: Floating Apartment ComplexWhere:
NetherlandsUnderwater Condos The Art History Archive -
Architecture
This Website is Best Viewed Using FirefoxLiving Beneath the
SeaDecades from now people in Canada and cities around the world
could be looking at fish going by and enjoying the view of
shipwrecks like the Sligo. Seen through the pressurized window of
an underwater condo, the stark wooden ribs of the 19th-century
schooner might be seen reaching up toward the surface of Lake
Ontario. To highlight the historic remains, the condo's board could
place lights around the bones of the Sligo so residents could watch
salmon schooling at night around the underwater landmark off the
western waterfront.
The Sligo is one of three visually dramatic wrecks on the bottom
of Lake Ontario, close to Toronto's shoreline. Now visited only by
scuba divers, breakthroughs in both building and air cleansing
technologies mean multiple dwelling habitats such as submerged
condos could one day be built within sight of the lake-bottom
attractions. Captain Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise called
space the final frontier, but that distinction may actually belong
to those parts of the planet covered by water. Michael Schutte, the
vice-president of engineering at U.S. Submarines, doesn't believe
it will take as long as 30 years before people are living on the
bottom of Lake Ontario. The Toronto-born-and-raised mega-yacht
designer is now based in Oregon overseeing the construction of an
underwater five-star hotel to open on the edge of a coral cliff in
the South Pacific by 2009. Schutte, 45, is overseeing the
above-water construction of the Poseidon Undersea Resort, which
will be taken to Fiji and placed on the bottom of a deep lagoon.
There will be 24 undersea hotel suites and apartments covering 51
square metres, anchored on the ocean floor 12 metres beneath the
surface. Although the hotel will have a fleet of small submarines,
getting down to the luxury suites (rumoured to be priced at $15,000
per person per week) won't actually mean getting in the water; the
building will be connected to the surface by elevators and air
shafts. "The only reason you haven't seen any underwater condos in
Toronto yet is that farmland is literally dirt cheap and underwater
construction is super expensive," Schutte says. "If you build a
unit that begins at the bottom of the lake and breaks the surface,
you are in essence simply building a basement onto a houseboat.
Given the price of waterfront land in Muskoka, as prices rise the
houseboat with a 10-storey cement basement has more and more
appeal."
Today, however, more people live in space than submerged in H20.
More research dollars are spent on establishing habitats on the
moon and Mars than underwater. "Why does everyone live on land
anyway?" asks Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield. "Three-quarters of
our planet is water and yet mankind is clustered haphazardly on the
land. From space you can easily see where people are congregated.
You just look for the 'Big Smear,' the bands of pollution that
permanently surround our large cities." "It is said that if we
could handle the density of Manhattan, the whole population of
North America could be placed in a state the size of Connecticut,"
Hadfield tells visitors at the Ontario Science Centre. "On land we
have randomly chosen where we live. But in the water, there would
have to be more order. Living underwater, like living in space, has
some challenges breathable air, potable water, construction
constraints and temperature but there are advantages, too. "It
would take housing pressures off agricultural land and allow (the
city) to access underwater resources for cooling, insulation,
electricity and, of course, water."
Click here to browse the Lilith eZine. Click here to browse the
Art History Archive. Hadfield, like most other NASA astronauts, has
spent time in the Aquarius permanent undersea laboratory, one of
the world's few underwater habitats, 20 metres down and five
kilometres east of the Florida Keys. The submerged building is
owned by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
and used for a wide range of underwater research projects. "People
live under the water today for very short periods of time usually a
week or less, but sometimes for extended periods of up to two to
three weeks," says Florida-based author, explorer and former
mission commander for seven NASA underwater missions, Dennis
Chamberland (see chamberland.org). "But no one has ever lived
undersea permanently not one person in all of history. My group is
planning to establish the first permanent civilian colony off
central Florida in 2012 and for the first time, mankind will have a
permanent address undersea. So it will happen in the next few
years, not 30!" Chamberland's Atlantica project will be using a
donated submarine (originally built to hunt for the Loch Ness
monster) to establish three manned undersea habitats over the next
five years. If the construction of the underwater station goes as
planned, people will begin living on the bottom beginning in 2012,
Chamberland says. "Humankind is attracted to the beautiful and
exotic places of our solar system. Just as man will be attracted to
one day living on the cliff sides of the Valley of the Mariners on
Mars, mankind will be attracted to live in the beauty of the
underwater regions of our own planet," he says. Schutte agrees.
"Living underwater is not a new idea," he says. "Hell, people in
their 40s and 50s who are in charge of investment funds and
brokerage houses and who grew up on Scientific American and Popular
Science know it is doable. And these people have the money to make
it happen.'' "The technology is already here," Schutte says. "In
essence, I am building a luxury yacht to sink beside a Fijian reef.
People are willing to spend $30 million on a boat, so why not an
underwater hotel?'' A decade ago a research project involving the
Canadian Navy's Cormorant dive tender found little life on the
floor of Lake Ontario near Toronto's Harbourfront area. But filling
in sections of Lake Ontario, albeit in relatively small blocks,
presents more political problems than ecological and construction
roadblocks. Would interest in underwater construction persuade
politicians to allow building in the same lake that provides
Toronto's drinking water? Blame much of the current interest in
underwater projects on Lloyd Godson, a young Australian scientist.
Earlier this year Godson, with the backing of the Australian
Geographic magazine, spent 12 days living in a yellow steel capsule
submerged in a flooded gravel pit. He built and sank "the world's
first self-sufficient, self-sustaining underwater habitat." Using
solar power sensors on the surface and riding a stationary bicycle
to produce additional electricity to keep his lights and computers
working, Godson lived independent of terra firma. The air that he
breathed was purified and recycled by algae soaked in his own
urine. His algae garden absorbed the carbon dioxide he exhaled, and
released oxygen for breathing (he did have to supplement his air
supply with air from scuba tanks). "The demand for information from
the media took me by surprise when I was underwater," Godson says.
"We were front page from England to Taiwan." After emerging Godson
was besieged with offers from the media to fund and film future
extreme adventures. He was in Toronto earlier this summer to shoot
a pilot TV show for Canada's Cineflix Productions, which wants to
make a 13-part series following Godson's future projects. "My
quarry project was done on a shoestring, but it shows that soon
people can live underwater and it can be done cheaply," Godson
says. "My habitat wasn't luxurious and there would have to be a lot
of improvements to be usable again. I had a bed, a computer, a
phone, email, plants and a fishing rod. I was doing all right, but
mate, it was a bit boring. "There is no noise underwater. If you
are a people person, an underwater home is not for you."