doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0 Report May 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corp Slide 1 802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports Date: 2010-05-20 N am e C om pany A ddress Phone em ail A drian Stephens Intel Corporation +44 792 008 4900 (m obile) [email protected]Authors:
103
Embed
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0 Report May 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports Date: 2010-05-20 Authors:
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
May 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1
802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports
Date: 2010-05-20
Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel
2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 3.01 Frame 7.2 No 2009 Adrian Stephens
18-May
s 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 7.0 9.0 8.03 5.0 Frame 8.0 No 2009 Kazuyuki Sakoda
18-May
aa 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 5.0 0.05 Word No 2009 Hang Liu 18-May
af 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 5.0 0.04 0.02 Frame 7.1 No 2009 Peter Ecclesine
18-May
Changes from last report shown in red.
Slide 6
May 2010 Draft Development Snapshot
Slide 6 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Pre-RevCom IEEE-SA Review
• Possibly near the end of Working Group Letter Ballot (3rd recirc or 4th recirc) , we will offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after RevCom.
• It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review.
• TGs Draft 7.0 is expected out of July plenary, and by agreement with ExCom and IEEE SA staff, will go for professional editing for ~50 days, after which Draft 8.0 will be available to start Sponsor Ballot.
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 7from slide 5/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
802.11 Style Guide
• See 11-09-1034-00-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc
Slide 8 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 6/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 9
TGm Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Montemurro Research in Motion 4701 Tahoe Blvd.
• Approved Recirculation Ballot following this session
• Scheduled Teleconference calls on June 18 and July 9 at 10 am ET for 2 hrs.
• No change to end date of plan of record
from slide 3/7 of 11-10/0659r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 12
Goals for July
• Resolve comments from recirculation ballot
• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool
• Obtain conditional approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
from slide 4/7 of 11-10/0659r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 13
Current TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests
Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot Nov 2009 – Recirc start• July 2010 – Conditional Sponsor Ballot Approval from EC• August 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days)• September 2010 – Sponsor Ballot start.• December 2010 – Sponsor Recirc. start• March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval• June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval
from slide 5/7 of 11-10/0659r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Motion Number 92
• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D3.0,
• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
from slide 4/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 27
TGv Timeline – Updated March, 2010
• Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0
• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)
• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09
• Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09– Oct 09 – D7.0 Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09
– Jan 09 – D8.0, D9.0, March D10.0, May D11.0, June D11.0 (unchanged)
– 20 August Revcom for Sept approval (was May/ June)
• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010
• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: September 2010 (was June 2010)
• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010
from slide 5/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 28
Goals for May 10 - July 2010
• Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
• Resolve comments from Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
• Subsequent Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
from slide 6/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 29
Motion
• Move to approve the TGv PAR extension in 11-10-0592-01-000v-par-extension.doc, extending the TGv PAR for an additional 1 year, and request the 802.11 WG to forward the PAR Extension Request to NESCOM.
• Mover: Allan Thomson
• Seconder: Qi Wang
• Result: 3-0-0 Passes
from slide 7/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 30
References
from slide 8/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 31
TGz Beijing May 2010 Closing ReportDate: 20 May 2010
Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,
from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 41
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGac for the May 2010 session.
from slide 2/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 42
Work Completed• Continued with the Ad Hoc group meetings. Ad Hoc group reports are
available at:– MAC Ad Hoc report 11-10-0625r0– PHY Ad Hoc report 11-10-0571r1– MU-MIMO Ad Hoc report 11-10-0570r3– Coexistence Ad Hoc report 11-10-0624r4
• Motions passed to update the TG Specification Framework in areas related to:
– MU-MIMO GroupID.– PHY-related motions on SU MCS, Subcarrier, Tone Allocation, P-Matrix, VHT
SIG bit allocation, etc.– 160 MHz PHY transmission.
• The current approved revision of the specification Framework is 09/0992r11
• Accepted a new revision of the TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology.
from slide 3/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
TG Approved Documents
• 11-09-059r5 is the approved TGac Selection Procedure document.
• 11-09-0161r2 is the approved TGac Usage Model document .
• 11-09-308r12 is the approved TGac Channel Models Addendum document.
• 11-09-0451r14is the approved TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document
• 09-0992r11 is the approved TGac Specification Framework document.
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 43from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 44
July 2010 Goals
• Continue the work on the Specification Framework document and its related functional blocks.
from slide 5/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 45
Conference Call Times
• PHY telecon schedule– June 24, 10:00 – 11:00 EDT
• MAC telecon schedule– Thursday, June 17, 10:00 – 11:00 EDT
from slide 1/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 47
Abstract
This document is the closing report for TGad for the May 2010 session.
from slide 2/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 48
Work Completed
• Complete proposals presentations• New Technique proposal presentations• Vote to confirm 10/433r2 as TGad D0.1 passed 68/0/1 !!!!!• TGad will be having an internal comment submission period
– Internal comment submission and resolution guidelines, 10/648r1– Comment submission period will open Friday, June 04, 2010, 23:59 EDT– Comment submission period will close Friday, June 25, 2010, 23:59 EDT– Email notification will be sent to the server
• Editor election– Carlos Cordeiro elected as TGad Editor, by acclamation
• Channel Modeling– Enterprise cubicle model complete– Channel model document updated and approved 44/0/1
• ITU-R 60GHz liaison discussion, 10/647
from slide 3/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 49
Complete Proposals
• CP 1– Presentation: Carlos Cordeiro, Intel, Gal Basson, Wilocity,
10/0432r2
– Draft text: 10/0433r2
– PAR, FRD and EVM declaration: 10/0434r0
– Simulation Results and Methodology: 10/0435r0
– PHY Simulations and Methodology: 10/0431r3
• CP 2– Presentation (including simulations, PAR, FRD and EVM
declaration): Hiroshi Harada, NICT, 10/0498r3
– Draft text: 10/0499r2
from slide 4/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 50
New Technique Proposals (1/2)
• Sync & Power Saving, Huai-Rong Shao, Samsung Electronics, 10/0446r1• TGad Common Preamble, Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, 10/0439r1• New MAC Features for TGad, Chao-Chun Wang, MediaTek, 10/0441r3• Beam training procedure for 60GHz mm-wave communication (TGad),
Junyi Wang, NICT, 10/0496r2• Relay Operation in IEEE 802.11ad, Kapseok Chang, ETRI, 10/0494r1• Fast Session Transfer, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom
R&D, 10/0491r2• Beamforming Introduction, Christopher Hansen, Broadcom, 10/0430r1• Fast Session Transfer, Naveen Kakani, Nokia, 10/0436r2• 60-GHz RF System Performance Optimization, Tian-Wei Huang,
National Taiwan University, 10/0497r0• TGad Security Enhancements, Yong Liu, Marvell, 10/0438r2• Beamforming training for IEEE 802.11ad, Changsoon Choi, IHP
microelectronics, 10/0493r1
from slide 5/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 51
New Technique Proposals (2/2)
• Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming, Thomas Derham, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0487r1
• MAC Link Maintenance, Haeyoung Jun, Samsung Electronics, 10/0445r1
• Beamforming, Kishore Ramachandran, NEC, 10/0450r3• Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz, Ichihiko Toyoda, NTT,
10/0492r2• Single Carrier PHY, Murat Mese, Broadcom, 10/0429r1• Spatial Frequency Sharing and BSS Management, James Yee,
• A motion formalizing internal TGad comment resolution (“the Motion”) on TGad draft specification D0.1 passed as recorded in 802.11-10/557r4
• This document provides guidelines for the internal TGad comment submission and resolution process
Slide 56
from slide 2/5 of 11-10/0648r1
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Comment Submission
• As described in the Motion, TGad draft specification D0.1 will be posted by Friday, June 04, 2010, 11:59PM EST– Two (2) weeks after the end of the May session
• Simultaneous to the publishing of D0.1, a comment submission period will begin– Announcement will be sent to TGad reflector
– Modified 802.11 letter ballot spreadsheet will be used to submit comments on D0.1 (see next slide)
– Comment submission will be open to 802.11 voters, potential voters, and aspirants in order to solicit comments from all who may be voting in letter ballot D1.0 scheduled for September/10
• Commenting period will last for 3 weeks closing on Friday, June 25, 2010, 11:59PM EST
Slide 57
from slide 3/5 of 11-10/0648r1
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Sample Comment Spreadsheet
• Question deleted– E.g., “Working Group Letter Ballot on "Should P802.11yy DX.0 be forwarded to Sponsor
Ballot?” does not apply
• Vote row deleted• “Part of No Vote” column deleted
Internal TGad Comment Submission on D0.1
Voter First name: <First Name>Voter Last Name: <Last Name>
23:59 hrs Eastern Time Voter Affiliation <Affiliation>DO NOT reformat or resize this form
Clause Page No.
Line No.
Comment Type (E or T) Comment / Explanation Recommended Change
Ballot Opens: Fri June 4, 2010Ballot Closes: Fri June 25, 2010
Slide 58
from slide 4/5 of 11-10/0648r1
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Comment Resolution
• Approach to comment resolution will be to group related comments and solicit contributions to resolve groups of comments (similar to 11n)
• Submissions will be reviewed in conference calls and during TGad sessions
Slide 59
from slide 5/5 of 11-10/0648r1
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 60
TGae Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Montemurro Research in Motion 4701 Tahoe Blvd.
from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 61
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGae Task Group for the May 2010 session.
from slide 2/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 62
Work Completed• Output:
– Discussion in implicit priority signaling for management frames– Voted to produce initial TGae draft 0.01.
• Teleconferences:– Thursday 11am ET for 90 minutes on June 3 and July 8
from slide 3/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 63
TGae Timeline – May 2010
• Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: November ‘10
• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: March ‘11
• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: May ‘11
• Initial Sponsor Ballot: July ‘11
• Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov ‘11
• Final WG/EC Approval: Mar ‘12
• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June ‘12
from slide 4/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 64
July 2010 Goals• Find an Editor and Secretary for TGae• Technical presentations and proposals• Review P802.11ae draft and target a WG internal review at the
end of the meeting.
from slide 5/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 65
IEEE 802.11 TGafBeijing Closing Report
Date: 2010-05-21
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In
Marc Emmelmann TU Berlin Einsteinufer 25 +49 30 314 24580 [email protected]
from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 73
AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Atlanta
meeting of the IEEE 802.11 TVWS SG.
from slide 2/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Agenda• AM1 Tuesday– Call for secretary– Review objectives and agenda for this session– Review IEEE/802 & 802.11 Policies and Rules– Introduction of FIA– Election of the Chair– Review draft of PAR & 5C
• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Recession
• PM1 Wednesday (Joint Meeting with TGu)– Introduction of FIA– Review draft of PAR & 5C
• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Recession
• AM1 Thursday– Approve of FIA study group agenda– Review draft of PAR & 5C
• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Time line of FIA – Schedule for Weekly Teleconference – Adjourn
• PM2 Thursday Ad hoc – Technical Presentation
• Hitoshi Morioka / 11-10/0650r3 An Example Idea of FIA– Hiroki Nakano / 11-10/0653r1 more Example Ideas around– FIAReview draft of PAR & 5C
• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Straw poll
• PAR & 5C – Do you believe the PAR&5C contained in 11-10-0583-r5 meet IEEE-SA guidelines, and are you in favor bring in the following text as
individual motion to the IEEE802.11WG during Friday closing plenary?
Slide 74 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Accomplishments• Hiroshi Mano was elected as chair of FIA-SG• Marc Emellman was elected as secretary of FIA-SG• Reviewed and Edited the 802.11 FIA PAR and 5C
– Finish and upload as 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc • Time line • Selected weekly teleconference as,
– Starting dates: Wednesday 2nd June 2010, Start Time 11:00 am and alternative 11:00 pm EST, Duration 1Hour
– Using WEB-EX that will be provided by Study Group Chair• Straw poll at Ad hoc on PM2 Thursday
– Do you believe the PAR&5C contained in 11-10-0583-r5 meet IEEE-SA guidelines, and are you in favor bring in the following text as individual motion to the IEEE802.11WG during Friday closing plenary? Motion:
– Request that the PAR contained in 11-10-0583-r5 and the Five Criteria contained in 11-10-0583-r5 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.
– Yes: 7, No:0, Abstain: 0
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 75from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Documents
• draft PAR & 5C– 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc
• Technical Presentation– 11-10/0650r3 An Example Idea of FIA
– 11-10/0653r1 more Example Ideas around FIA
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 76from slide 5/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Thanks to all who participated!
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 77from slide 6/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 78
S1G Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dave Halasz Aclara 30400 Solon Rd
from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 79
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the S1G Study Group for the May 2010 session.
from slide 2/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 80
Work Completed• Output:
– 10/0001r8 Approved in S1G 9-0-1– Motion to occur in full WG
from slide 3/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 81
July 2010 Goals• IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) approval to submit to
NesCom
from slide 4/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Motion
• Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, request that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in 10/0001r8 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.
• Moved by Dave Halasz on behalf of S1G SG
• Moved: Dorothy Stanley , Seconded: Garth Hillman Result: 9-0-1
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 82from slide 5/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 83
IEEE 802.11Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee
Closing ReportDate: 2010-05-21
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In
from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0674r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 84
AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Beijing
meeting of the IEEE 802.11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee.
from slide 2/6 of 11-10/0674r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Agenda
• Administrative items– Required notices
– Review and approve teleconference minutes
• Introduction
• The regulatory summaries– North America
– European Union
– Asia
• FOCUS: – FCC Net Neutrality
Slide 85 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/6 of 11-10/0674r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report
Regulatory AHC Activities
• Presented regulatory summaries from North America, the EU and Asia
• Reviewed the latest information regarding EN 300 328 revision– ERM TG11 status
– ERM TG28 Wireless Factory efforts to circumvent sharing rule
• Discussed the court ruling in Comcast v. FCC– FCC has only ancillary authority over “broadband”
• Discussed the FCC Chairman’s plan in light of service providers’ threat to reduce investment and slow broadband rollout– Limited Title II regulatory control over only the “transmission service”
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 86from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0674r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
from slide 5/12 of 11-10/0672r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 94
Smart Grid Use Case Requirements Derived
Requirements included in release 3.0
Meter Read Yes Yes Direct load control In progress No Service Switch Yes Yes PHEV Yes Yes System updates In progress No Distributed GEN In progress No Distributed Storage Draft No Outage Events Yes Yes Tamper Events Draft No Meter Events Draft No Demand Response Draft No Pre-Pay Metering Yes Yes Field Force tools Not started No Distribution auto support Yes Yes Transmission auto support Not started No Pricing TOU / RTP/ CPP in progress No Configuration mgmt in progress No Accounting Mgmt in progress No Performance Mgmt in progress No Security mgmt in progress No Fault mgmt in progress No Volt/VAR Management Yes Yes
Listing of pertinent use casesIn order to create a list of functional requirements for the Smart Grid, an exercise was performed to list all pertinent use cases that involve network communication. Sources for this information include the Southern California Edison Use Cases, Grid Wise Architectural Console use cases, EPRI and others. Use cases from all of these sources were selected based upon a network requirements basis. From this research the following high level use cases have been identified
from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0673r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 102
Abstract
Closing report for JTC1 ad hocfor May 2010, Beijing, China
from slide 2/3 of 11-10/0673r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
May 2010
doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 103
JTC1 ad hoc reviewed items related to SB drafts, PSDO, WAPI & tutorial
• Progress in Beijing (May 2010)– Reviewed status of SB drafts sent to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6
• Latest 11v/p/z were NOT sent to SC6
– Discussed possible liaison to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 regarding process comments from the China NB• Chair took action to draft letter that will be reviewed later today
– Review WAPI status in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6• No change since WAPI NP was approved
– Discuss any other JTC1/SC6 liaison matters• Discussed options for working with SC6 on reviewing WAPI and
ensuring coexistence with 802.11
• Plans for San Diego (July 2010)– Identify IEEE rep for JTC1/SC6 meeting in London in Sept
from slide 3/3 of 11-10/0673r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco