IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTM RN DISY CT OF FLORD A FILEDby D û Dr. JUL 232212 STEVENM LARIMnRE CLERKUàasTcT, s. o.of/tâ.-MùMI CASE NO .: II-ZOIN -CIW SEITZ/SM ONTON TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU, Plaintif, VS. Dlsm s CHARIT , œ s IN , c ANA GISPE , RT DEREK Tllom s ANo LASHANDA Aow s Defendants PLY TIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEG NTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM NT m GCORPORATED G MORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SIFMM ARY JUDGG NT Plaintif issllingthisresponsetotheDefendant'sSupplemental M otion For SllmmaryJudgment AndIncorpomtedM emorandum OfLaw In Support OfM otion ForStlmmary Judgment. In tlleirmotion the DefendsntsareaskingtbisCourt to strike a11thePlaintiœ s pleadzgs. Striking thePlaintiœ spleadzg wouldmean, in theirtactics , eraszg them 9om thedocket, thushiding thetnzth which canbebenescial totheDefendsnt in the future. ThePlaintif intendsonceagain to set therecord s% ight inthiscaseand bring the trutll tothesurface.Plaintiffwouldkindlyliketoremindthis court that Justiceisnot about fancyEnglishwritingor citingthebest cases. Justiceisaboutseekngand sndingthe truth, and below thiscourt will 5nd thetruth: Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 1 of 70
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTM RN DISY CT OF FLORD A
FILED by D û Dr.
JUL 2 3 2212
STEVEN M LARIMnRECLERKU à asT cT,s. o.of/tâ.-MùMI
CASE NO .: II-ZOIN -CIW SEITZ/SM ONTON
TRAIAN BUJDUVEAN U,
Plaintif,
VS.
Dlsm s CH ARIT ,œ s IN ,c ANA GISPE ,RT
DEREK Tllom s ANo LASHANDA Aow sDefendants
PLY TIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEG NTAL M OTION
FOR SUM M ARY JUDGM NT m G CORPORATED G M ORANDUM OFLAW IN SUPPORT OF M OTION FOR SIFMM ARY JUDGG NT
Plaintif is slling this response to the Defendant's Supplemental M otion For
Sllmmary Judgment And Incorpomted M emorandum Of Law In Support Of M otion
For Stlmmary Judgment.
In tlleir motion the Defendsnts are asking tbis Court to strike a11 the Plaintiœ s
pleadzgs. Striking the Plaintiœ s pleadzg would mean, in their tactics, eraszg them
9om the docket, thus hiding the tnzth which can be benescial to the Defendsnt in the
future.
The Plaintif intends once again to set the record s% ight in this case and bring the
trutll to the surface. Plaintiffwould kindly like to remind this court that Justice is not
about fancy English writing or citing the best cases. Justice is about seekng and
snding the truth, and below this court will 5nd the truth:
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 1 of 70
1. G TRODUCTION
On Jtme 12, 2009, Plaintifpled guilty under 18 U.S.C. 371 to conspH cy to
violate the lntem ational Emergency Economic Powers Act, The lranian tx saction
regulations and the Arms Export Conkol Act. (Exhibit 1)
2. Plaintiffwas given a 35-montb sentence following a governm ent act, ill an attem pt
to divert the world's attention on Iran at a time when the rest of the world commtmity
wms tired of generated propaganda on Imn. Said Keshari, Dragos Segarceanu and a
few others have been used as <f ollateral Damage'' seeing that the government was
never interested in any 30 to 50 year o1d aircraR parts which could not be used even
for a museum display. n e govemment wms interested to fmd out what Traian
Bujduveanu knew about the current situation in Iran and details about his meeting
w1t11 former Iranian Oo cials in 2007 in lstanbul, Turkey, an event which wms
reported on by Tlzrkish and Romanian Intel under the Bilateml Aveement.
3. AII motions and requests of the Defendant at the time were denied. The
govemment directed thejudges to strike and erase any information h'om the docket
that would reveal the trutb. n e Defendant was then labeled ms a çtrestricted ller'' so
he would not be able to file any document on the docket of tbat case, which would
make any unwanted govemment information public. (Exhibit 2)
4. Since then, the Plaintiffwas labeled as a criminal, a terrorist a spy, arms
dealer, and arms crusader. Stories about him were published in more than
12,000 newspaper and internet ardcles all over the world by the government in
an attempt to amplify the focus on Iran. (EXHIBIT 3 )
2
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 2 of 70
II. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. The Plaintiffwas infected with the Hepatitis C virus, Asian Genotype 6, in the
early 1990s while attending a Protocol Dinner on behalf of the United States
Government, inside the North Korean Embassy located in Bucharest, Romania.
This is well documented in certain sles classised by the United States
Government All information about the Plaintiff is classised undl 2035.
(EXHIBIT 4)
6. On July 10, 2010, for medical reasons and non-treatment by the B0P for
rapidly deteriorating medical condidon, the BOP assigned the Plaintiffto a
halfway house in Dania, Florida, operated by the Defendant Dismas Charities, Inc.
7. Dismas Charities,lnc., was fully aware of the PlaintiTs medical condition at all
dmes and had access to m ore than 300 pages of medical records re> rding the
Plaintiff, written by the B.O.P. physicians. (DE#14, EXHIBIT A)
8. Dismas Charities, Inc. in Dania is a part of a 40 million dollar-a-year private
corporation, operating under the shield of a non-prost corporation, which has
made numerous donations to various political parties, and which obviously
exercises some power over our justice system. As such, despite various criminal
activities of the Dismas house personnel around United States, no case has ever
been won by anyone opposing them, and Dism as Charities, Inc. has always
em erged as a Clean Corporation.
9. After his snival at Dism as Charities halfway house, and in order to comply w1111
regulations, the Plaintiff brought his driving records Fom the Clerk of Court,
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 3 of 70
records âom tbe DM V in Tallahassee, registation, and AllsGte insurance.
Documents were placed by Colmselor Lmshanda Adams in the Plaintitrs sle, located
inside the Dismas facility. (DE# 14, EXHIRIT B )
10. On September 28, 2011, the M ovant hnd a home conGnement kansfer approved
by the CCM Director Carlos Rodriguez. 'fhis w as due to severe m edical problem s.
The USPO Oo ce was advised and agreed on the Plaintifrs home consnement
kansfer, requiring the PlaintiF to report to the Dismas halfway house once a week.
Regulations 9om the Federal Bmeau of Prisons state that ççonly he Director of CCM
can kansfer a prisoner 9om the halfway house, or from the halfway house back to the
Federal prisom''.
11. As a result of the approval from the CCM, Dism as Charities, lnc. placed the
Plaintiffon Hom e Coninem ent and required him to report to the halfway house
once a week
12. A hom e consnement agreementwas signed by the Plaintiffupon request
from the Defendants. This agreement does not conmin anywords about the use
of cell phones while in Home Consnement A cell phone could becom e a violadon
in the moment that it is in the physical possession of a person and the individual
brings the phone inside the halfway house facility. (EXHIBIT 5 )
13. Plainte is kndly askng this Courtto read the Condidons of Home
Consnem ent carellly. If this court desires to change the f'Conditions of Hom e
Conhnement'' regarding cell phones, then this Court should issue an order
which would obligate the BOP to change these conditions and rules. (Exhibit 5)
4
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 4 of 70
14. Dismas Charities house has limited independent disciplinary discretiow thus
granting them discretion over minor prohibited acts. Any serious sanctions required
the approval of CCM , USPO and Community Sanctions Representatives. N one of the
violations in this case advocated by the defendsnts are listed as serious violations.
n us, they do not require incarceration or serious sanctions to be approved by the
CCM , USPO and Community Sanctions Representatives. In addition, no bearings of
any kind were ever held in the presence of the Plaintif, by CC, USPO, BOP, or
Dismas Charities, as required by the regulations of the Federal Bmeau of Prisons, as
advocated by the Defendants and their Attomey.
15. The correct procedure to sancdon an offender, required by the Federal
Bureau of prisons is as follows:
a) If the offense is listed as a Minor Offense, then the halfway house will attempt
to resolve the issue in the house.
b) If the offense is listed as Greater Offense, then a hearing of the offender should
be held by the halfway house, CCM, USPO, or Community Sancdons
Representative, at which the offender must be present If found guilty of the
charges, then the offender is transported back to the Federal Prison. Cn e CCC
Con% ctor, the provider of Home ConGnement, shall develop a system for handling
violations of program rules, which meets the ''due process'' criteria of W ollv.
M cDonald, and includes provisions for dealing with minor infractions of program
rules for prisoners in Hom e Conlnem ent.'' See ttprogram Statement 5270.0 Inmate
Discipline''.)
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 5 of 70
c) A hearing must be conducted by a DHO inside the Federal Prison, in the
presence of the offender. If found guilty, then the offender will have to be held in
the Federal Prison until the end of his sentence. If the offender is not found guilty
by the DHO, then the offender is released back into the community.
16. Plaintiff should not be responsible if the Contractor Dismas Charities, Inc.,
does not lmow the rules of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Also, the Plaintifdoes
not have to demonstrate or cite the rules of the Federal Bureau of Prisons here.
lt is the responsibility of the of Bureau of Prisons Contractor and the Southern
Distric't of Florida, who should be well aware of these rules.
17. Defendan? further argue that the Plaintiffwanted to attend a specisc
church, and that in fact it was notthe Defendant that did not permit the Plaintiff
to attend a Romanian Orthodox Church. However the truth is shown in the
documents attached here as an exhibit There are onlytwo Orthodox Romanian
churches and the Plaintisasked permission to go to one of them first. W hen it
was denied, Plante asked permission to attend the other Romanian church. This
matter was discussed with the Defendants on more than one occasion and the
Defendants were well aware of that This is just another misleadinp false, and
contadictory statement by the Defendanl, which has changed numerous dmes
during the course of this case. (Exhibit 6)
18. This case is full of m isleadinp false, and contradictory statem ents. All
this court has to do is to read the whole case. Only then will the truth become
more visible and unless the fate of this case was decided beforehand, it would
6
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 6 of 70
not be possible for this Court to believe all the false and misleading statements of
the Defendan? when the evidence clearly shows another side of the story.
19. Defendants stated that the ''Bureau Of Prisons held a hearing concerning his
possession of a cell phone and driving a vehicle without authorization. Plaintiff
was found guilty...-''
There was no such hearing as there is no Vace of it in the Sentry System, and the
Bureau of Prisons does not even have a vague idea about such a hearing. Again,
how is it possible thatthis court can accept such false statements?
20. Plainuffis asldng this court notto rule on this case until the Bureau of
Prisons responds with a SENTRY REPORT. A ruling in the absence of the Sentry
Repo> and other reports on the matter, by the Federal Agencies involved in
this matter, will diminish the ability of the Plaintiff to bring the truth to the
surface. If this court is not interested in the Guth, then it should rule on this case
as it pleases. It would not be possible for any justice system in this world to
accept such false statemenl.
21. The Defendants allege that f'the Plaintiff seeks to exact his personal vendetta
and revenge upon Defendants and the prison system through this frivolous lawsuit''
This case is not about ''personal vendetta'' or money. This case is about JUSTICE and
TRUTH in a dem ocratic societp seeing how in the last 20 years this country has
forgotten what dem ocracy is, swept up in an environm ent of corruption and
dictatorship.
7
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 7 of 70
22. The Defendants allege: f/The Plaintiff drove to Dismas and was found to be in
possession of a cell phone in the car...''
Plaintiffwould like to rem ind the Defendants that a violadon of possession of a cell
phone is considered when an offender attempts to enter the residence building of
the halfway house while having a cell phone in his pocket. In this case, the Plaintiff
NEVER entered the Dismas Charities residence building with a cell phone in his
pockets or in his possession. The phone was used by PlaintiFs family for emergency
sim ations and was located in the glove com partm ent of the car, used by the
Plainlff's family. The Plaintiff did not even know that a telephone existed in the car.
This whole fabricauon was done w ith a lot of hate for the Plaintiff. If the Plaintiff
would have wanted a cell phone, it w ould have been easier to pay Derek Lam ar
Thomas, or another Dismas employee, to have one, as everybody else in the halfway
house was doing. However the Plaintiffnever needed a cell phone, as he was using
public telephones installed everywhere inside Dismas building. The Plaindffcan
bring m any ex- residents of Dism as house that will state the fact that they w ere
paying weekly to be able to have a cell phone inside the Dism as house.
23. In their ''Uncontested Facts'', again in an attempt to mislead this Courk the
Defendants allege: 'The Bureau of Prisons terminated the Plaindfffrom the
residential re-entry center due to noncompliance w ith program rules and
regulations. Plaintiffwas then taken into custody by the U.S. M arshall and
transported to the Federal Detendon Center in Miam i, where he remained until
his release 81 days laten''
24. The Federal Bureau of Prisons did not cause the Plaintifl's Home Consnem ent
term ination. It w as the Defendants that com mitted illegal acts, and in an attempt to
8
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 8 of 70
cover these illegal acts, they returned the resident to M iam i Federal Detention
Center. Even the rem rn to M iami Federal Detention Center was illegal, and this can
be confirm ed by M iam i FDC Counselor Price, Unit Manager Harrison, and the
W arden of Miami FDC.
25. Defendants allege: ''The Federal Bureau of Prisons clearly knew he w as at a the
federal facility as the Bureau of Prisons held a hearing concerning his possession of a
cell phone and driving a vehicle without authorization. PlaintiFwas found guilty of
these offenses at the hearing and required to serve the remaining 68 day balance of
his inidal sentence at FDC M iam i, at the direction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons,
not Dism as-''
26. This hearing m ust be conducted in the presence of the offender. ln this case the
Defendants failed to provide a copy of the hearing and the results, because they
sim ply do not exist. Such hearings never took place and they will be revealed in the
SENTRY REPORTS generated by the B0P and other Federal Agencies. The Probation
Officer found out about Plaintiff's incarceration after m ore than one m onth, and this
will also be revealed in the documents which will be released by the U.S. Probation
Office. (DE# 110 and Exhibit )
27. The Federal Bureau of Prisons does NOT have a written reguladon that
sotes that a violation of ''driving an automobile or possession of a cell phone'' in
a home detenuon environment requires the prisoners to be returned to Federal
Prison. On the contrary, the Federal Bureau of Prisons considers this to be a
minor violadon that should be resolved in the house. The decision to rem rn the
resident to the Fedeml Prison was made entirely by the defendants and NOT by
9
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 9 of 70
the Federal Bureau of Prisons or its representadves in a case such this. This is an
attempt again, by the Defendants, to justify their illegal actions. lf such reguladon
existed in the Federal Bureau of Prisons manuals, then a copy should have been
provided. Plaintiffwas never found to have a cellular telephone in his possession
while being a resident at Dismas House. The case of the Defendants relies on a
telephone found in a glove compar% ent of the vehicle he drove, while the
Plaintiffwas on Hom e Consnement The Home ConsnementAgreement does not
cono in restrictions regarding cellular telephones. In Fact the Home Conhnement
Agreement does not contain even one word about cellular telephones. That is
because in many sotes, they suggest Home Conhnement Residents should have a
cellular telephone, so they could stay in contact w1t,11 the Halfway House and the
Probation OfficenThe PlaintiFis kndly askng this Court to read the Home
Consnement Agreement (Exhibit 7)
28. Plaintiffis expecting a copy of the SENTRY REPORT from the Sate Attorney
concerning all Federal Agencies involved in this incident This should reveal
some of the truth in this case. (Exhibit 8)
CONCLUSION
For all the resons set forth above, the Plaintif move this court for an Order to
rule after all the Government Agencies involved in this incident will respond.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 10 of 70
Exhibit 1
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 11 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 12 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 13 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 14 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 15 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 16 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 17 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 18 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 19 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 20 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 21 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 22 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 23 of 70
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 24 of 70
Munitions Dealers Arrested For Conspiracy To Export Military Aircraft Parts To Iran - Conservative Crusader 30/10/2011 15:36
But Bujduveanu did have his day in the court, and he pleaded guilty to the charges. On April 2, 2009, Bujduveanu appeaSouthern District of Florida courtroom and capimlated to the govemment's singular charge of conspiracy to illegally exImilitary and dual use aircraft parts to lru . He reentered the same court on June 11, 2* 9, for sentencing: 35 months in ftprison to be followed by 3 years of supervised release.
ççYou must understand how tlle government works. When they arrested me they put me in a SIIU tspecial Housing Unif.completely isolated and sleeping on the floor for the flrst ten days. My attomey had to plead with the court to take me dcgeneral population area. n is is here in the United States, not some Third W orld country.''tq'he government threatened me with other charges, crazy charges. A1l lies. But remember, I've seen them lie. 'Illey are
at lying. This I've exmrienced flrst handy'' Bujduveanu says with an nlmost casual reference to Ms past dealings with goagents dtuing the Romanian plot. ttI had to think of my elderly mother and my son.''Bujduveanu has a seventeen year old son who lives wlth Ms ex-wife only a few rniles from his home. n eir residence msev hed, computers confiscated and Ms son's vacation money seized.
Additionally, Bujduvemnu had no access to his document.s or the Internet in order to properly aid in Ms defense. He wentthree different lawyers before he was able to fmd someone with the exm rtise to help him. By then he had pled guilty an(sentenced, but still held out hope for Ms appeal. n en the courq in alliance with the govemment, insEtuted the gag orderhim little to hope for at tllis point, like being halfway home.AII were in the ovenzsed name of nauonal defense and homeland security. Indict and convict, but don't allow tlle defendon a defense or appeal by congonting their accusers or challenging the evidence. W ith the stoke of all execuéve order pand a government sm nsomd gag order there. a new American story is told.
But that still doesn't answer the original question. Why? And why Traian Bujduveanu? As one recent U.S. president saitbecause they can.n e United States foreign m licy efforts since the Iraqi war have been dismal. Friendly or otherwise empathetic countrie:
the world have been hesitant to give America the same kind of carte blnnk suppoh they once did in the immediate aftem09/11. n is is particularly mze of the cautious, or even skepdcal, view countries take with regard to America stands regaIn a related case tltis past May, a French COIM refused an American request to extadite an Imnian businessman who waE
of violating an American embargo on exports to lrnn. Majid Kakavand, 37, had been arrested at a Paris airport in Marchan American warrant. But the French government prosecutor opposed the extadition request noting that Kakavand had 1
violated French 1aw and that the equipment involved ç'was not necessarily rnilitary in nature.'' Cfhe New York Times, TlMay 6, 2010)So the American government seeks to achieve their goals by fmding scamjoats here at home, backed by the coltrts and,pe cular, a conservative Supreme Court found to be even more conservatwe in its intemretations of the W ar Powers A(Lœstly, tllrough fear and intimidation, the govemment acquires the assistance of its citizens in combadng the Gaytis of evit41= . n e message is: RBe nfrnid, be very afraid, to do business with anyone of lranian decent or afftliation.'' The govemnot be able to get away with racial proflling, but its citizens can.Everm ne involved in this case have disappeared. n e PSI oo cer, the lawyers, the state attorney, tlle federal agents, and
the agencies involved in this case faded away. n e only two people remaining in this case are Bujduveanu and Judge Sei
Case in point: Arizona's new illegal alien law makes it a cn'me for anyone to give aid to an illegal alien. lf a driver pulle'a simple traflk stop is found to have an illegal alien in their vehicle, they have committed a crlme by giving them a ride.cidzens are required to determine if each passenger is legally on this side of the border. 'Ihe simplest way to achieve thenot give a ride to anyone with a Spanish surname, a Spanish nrrent or a brown skin tone not attribute to the Adzona sun
But that's anotller new American story.
Cxoselu Anton Reolv tt
On June 21, 2* 8, the United States by and through the following agencies: Federal Bureau of lnvesigations, United StJDepnrtment of Homeland Security, lmmigration and Customs Enforcement, National Security Agency, United States CtOflke, United States Immlgration Depnrtment of Defense Criminal Inveségation Service, Depndment of Treasury - OffForeign Asset.s Control, Plantation Police Depnrtment, Broward Cotmty SheriffDepngtment, Plantadon Fire and RescueDepnrtment of Commerce, Urlited States Depnrtment of State - Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Depnrtment of A
United States Marshall, did xaid Traian Bujduveanu's residence.'nis raid requiring over 30 agents to overwhelm any resistance which may have been offered by Traian Bujduveanu or ifour year o1d blind mother, pennitted the govemment to seize ex% mely valuable mssets which according to the lead prol
for the United States were clnimed in Court to be worth more th% % 1œ ,0œ from the boxes alone'', not including the ccomputers.Contrary to the representations made by the assistant United States attomey in her place as an attorney before the bar in
court, during the preconvention motion, the assets seized were less than $ 10,e .00 rather than considerable çt over $ 10aircraft parts and consisted of antiqued aircraft parts, this even nfter an extensive search involving dozens of agents digg
in the Traian Bujduveanu's garden.n e patently ridiculous television type drnma did not hm est anything more than would have been recovered if lhe Unitz
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 25 of 70
Munitions Dealers Arrested For Conspiracy To Export Mijitary Aircraft Parts To Iran - Conservative Crusader 30/10/2011 15:36
had chosen to detain Traian Bujduveanu while at or on the way to Publix tbe mevious day, or had the United States calrrknocked on the door with a search warrsnt instead of terrorizing an eightpfour year old blind woman and sending her tohospital by striking her.
According to the witnesses that have been questioned or interrogated, Traian Bujduveanu was under surveillance since 2which remesents considerable time before tbe Taid, and could have been delnined without tbe need to break in aad breakdoors, causing unneeded damages to the property and by standers.
Apparently, the bureaucratic imperauve of needing to justify the exmnses of this misadventure create suflkient rationallUnited States Attorney's Office to Y have in a manner more consistent with Romania's former communism regkine th%
clause'' in the United States Constimtion.of tlle GtnkingIt is regrettablecould have % enA current colleague tym of fear comment from any citiyzm
, let alone atlbecause when the government's citizens have become âfraid of the government
, especially where it involves the citizenswillingness to sm ak the mzth, t'the government no longer has legitimate authority to govenf'.n e government conducted a massive invesfgation to get a handful of used p%
, which if presented to a jury would hawnot only in acquittal, but made the government a laughing stock.
Bujduveanu regrets buckling into the coercion of the govemment and Ms innate fear of government instead of properly Ithe case to court and public and having his day in court.
were afraid to challenge the United States olAerwiseBujduveanu's prior counsels, omnly admitted, theymore promptly addressed.
of Bujduveanu has said it is a shame to hear tllis
aud a comment
Name tFirst name, Last lnitial ie: Bob S . )l !t . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . t
Add a Comment
I
lll
W .....% ,Email l'rllis will never be shown, and is only used for comment notifications if requested)
0 Notify me if someone replies to my comment?
Submit
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 26 of 70
DOJ Press Release; DEFENDANT PLFADS GUILR TO CONSRRING TO EXO RT MILITARY AIRCRAFT PARTS TO IRAN 30/10/2011 15:35
About BIS Home wNews > DoJ prerss Release
New s For Im m ediate Release: January 26 2009.;-272ïContact - BIS Public Afaio 202-48.-
Press Releases
Speeches 7 . ' ' 't
-1- jest m ony
Publications
EIPGFORiC FOIA ' ' '
Archives
Policies AndU.S. Depae m ent of JusticeRegulationsUnited States Attorney's Om ce
Licensing District of Colum bia
(202) 514-2007Compliance AndEnforcem ent
Sem inars And Training
International
Program s W ASHINGTON - R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern
District of Florida, Michael Johnson, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Departm ent ofDefense IndustrialCom merce, Office of Export Enforcem ent, Anthony V. Mangione, Special Agent inBase Program sCharge, U.S. Im migration and Customs Enforcem ent, Office of Investigations,and Sharon W oods, Director, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Crim inal
Investigative Service, announced that defendant Hassan Saied Keshari and hiscorporation, Kesh Air Intem ational pled guilty this mom ing in Miam i to charges!of conspiring to illegally export m illtal and comm ercial aircrao parts to Iran.Keshari appeared on behalf of himself and Kesh Air International in federal courttoday to announce their guilty pleas. Charges are still pending against two
remaining defendants charged in the indictment, Traian Bujduveanu and hiscorporation, Orion Aviation Corp. Sentencing is scheduled for April 8, 2009 at8:30 a.m . before U.S. District Judge Patricia A. Seitz.
DEFEN DA NT PLEA DS G UILTY T0 CO NSPIRING T0
EX PO RT M ILITA RY A IRCRAFT PARTS TO IRA N
Count 1 of the lndidment, to which Keshari and Kesh Air International pledguilty, charges conspiracy to export and cause the export of goods from theUnited States to the Islam ic Republic Iran, in violation of the Em bargo im posedupon that country by the United States and in violation of the International
Emergency Economic Powers Ad, Title 50, United States Code, 1705(a), and toexpoo and cause to be exported defense articles, in violation of the Arms ExgortControl Ad, Title 22, United States Code, Sedion 27784b), aII in violation of ritle18, United States Code, Section 371. On the conspiracy count, Hassan Saied
Keshari faces a maximum statutory term of (5) years' imprisonment and amaximum 5ne of $250,000. Kesh Air International faces a statutory maximumfine of $500,000.
According to docum ents sled with the court during the plea hearing, Keshari, anIranian national and naturalized United States citizen, by and through hisNovato, California, corporation, Kesh Air Interhational, purchased aircrao parts
on behalf of purchasers in lran and exported the aircrao parts to lran by way of
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 27 of 70
DOJ Pres: Release: DEFENDANT PLFADS GUILTY T0 CONSPIRING TO GO RT MILITARY AIRCRAG PARTS TO IRAN 50/10/1011 15:35
freight forwarders in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The m ilitary aircrao paAwere purchased from a supplier in Broward County, defendant Traian
Bujduveanu, who operated through his Broward County business, defendantOrion Aviation Corp. Among the aircrao paA illegally exported to Iran throughthe conspiracy were paos designed exclusively for the F-14 Fighter Jet, theCobra AH-I Attack Helicopter, and the CH-53A Military Helicopter. AII of theseaircrao are paQ of the lranian m ilitary fleet, while the F-14 is known to be ugedexclusively by the Iranian military.
Moreover, all of the parts supplied by Keshari as part of the conspiracy aremanufactured in the United States, are designed exclusively for m ilitary use, andhave been designated by the United States Depaoment of State as ''defensearticles'' on the United States Munitions List, thus requiring registration and
licensing with the Dejartment of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.Neither Keshari nor hIs co-defendane are registered or had the required Iicensesto ship defense articles to Iran.
According to the Indictment and docum ents 5Ied with the court during the plea
hearing, Keshari received orders by email from buyers in Iran for specisc aircraft
parts. Keshari then requested quotes, usually by e-mail, from Bujduveanu andother suppliers and made arrangements for the sale and shipm ent of the parts toa com pany in Dubai through the use of false or misleading shipping documents.From Dubai, the parts were then shipped on to the purchasers in Iran.
Keshari has been in federal custody since his arrest in June 2008 and will remain
in custody pending his sentencinj. Co-defendant Bujduveanu also remains infederal custody awaiting trial, whlch is scheduled for May 2009.
Mr. Acosta comm ended the investigative efforts of the U.S. Department ofComm erce, Om ce of Export Enforcement, U.S. Im migration and CustomsEnforcement, Office of Investigations, and the U.S. Depertm ent of Defense,Defense Criminal Investigative Service, for their work on this investigation. Thecase is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Dam ian.
Over the past fiscal year, the National Export Enforcement Initiative has alsoresulted in the creation of Counter-proliferation Task Forces in various judicialdistricts around the country. Today, there are approximately 15 such task forcesor versions of them nationwide. In addition, the initiative has resulted inenhanced training for more than 500 agents and prosecutors involved in exportcontrol and the creation of new mechanism s to enhance counter-proliferation
coordination among law enforcement agencies, expoo Iicensing agencies and theIntelligence Com m unity.
Among the most recent cases brought in connection with the initiative was anindictm ent returned today in the Distrid of Minnesota charging three individuals
,zian W ei Ding, Kok Tong Lim , and Ping Cheng, with conspiring to illegally export
to the People's Republic of China (PRC) controlled carbon-sber material withapplications in rockets, satellites, spacecrat, and uranium enrichm ent process.According to the indictm ent, the intended destination for som e of the m aterialwas the China Academ y of Space Technology, which oversees research institutes
working on spacecrao system s for the PRC.
Unveiled in Od. 2007, the National Export Enforcem ent lnitiative is a cooperetive
effort by the Justice Department's National Security Division (NSD), theDepartm ent of Hom eland Security's U.S. lm m igration and Custom s Enforcement
(ICE), the Federal Bureau of lnvestigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce'sBureau of lndust; and Security (BIS), the Pentagon's Defense CriminalInvestigative Servlce (DCIS), the State Department's Diredorate of DefenseTrade Controls, the Treasury Departm ent's Om ce of Foreign Assel Control andother agencies.
# # #
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 28 of 70
Repubtic Broadcasting Network 01/07/2912 14254
' 5JE; '.
) y. .' .. ) A A
M UNITIONS DEALERS ARRESTED FOR CONSPIRACY T0 EXPORT MILITARY AIRCDAFT
PARTS TO IRAN
By Jim KouriReoublicBroadcastina.ora
CLICK HERE to send this article to a friend!
1- - -E@ ul t -L4 l KI , Eilw C-----=1 (ZK E;K I (K ESK I IZK 1, k LTIK l - - o k m a r k T h i s !
Defendants Hassan Saied Keshari and Traian Bujduveanu were arrested on June 20 and 21 on charges of conspiringto export m ilitary aircrao parts to lran, according to a report obtained by the National Assoclation of Chiefs of Police.
The two suspects are charged in a federal criminal complaint with conspiring to violate the International EmerjencyEconom ic Powers Ad, the United States Iran Em bargo, and the Arms Export Control AG for their participation ln aconspiracy to export U.s.-m ade m ilital aircrao parts to the Iranian militaa .
According to the am davit filed in support of the criminal complaint, Keshari owns and operates Kesh Air
Internatlonal, é business located in Novato, California. Bujduveanu owns and operates Orion Aviation Corp., locatedin Plantation, Florida.
The amdavit alleges that since August 2006, Keshari and Bujduveanu have procured Us-made milital aircraA partsin the United States for buyers in Iran and have illegally shipped the paA to a com pany in Dubai, United ArabEm irates, for shipment to buyers in lran.
Keshari allegedly received the orders for specific parts by e-mail from buyers in Iran. Keshari then requested quotes,usually by e-mall, from Bujduveanu and made arrangements with Bujduveanu for the sale and shipment of the part.sto a com pany in Dubai. From Dubai, the parts were then shipped on to lran.
Among the aircrao paA that Keshari and Bujduveanu are alleged to have obtained and illegally shipyed to buyers inIran are parts for the CH-53 militaœ hejicopter, the F-14 Tomcat sjhter jet, and the AH-I attack hellcopter. Keshariis also alleged to have requested quotes for other parts for other m llitaœ aircraQ, including F-4 Phantom aircrao.
AII of these aircraft are known to be used prim arily, if not exclusively, by the Iranian military. Moreover, all of the
parts supplied by Keshari and Bujduveanu are manufadured in the United States, are designed exclusively form ilitary use, and have been designated by the United States Departm ent of State as ''defense articles'' on the United
States Munitions List, thus requiring registration and Iicensing with the DDTC. Neither Keshari nor Bujduveanu areregistered or had the required Iicense to ship defense articles to Iran.
Shortly before m idnight on Friday, June 20, 2008, federal agents arrested Keshari at Miam i lnternational Airpoo ashe walked off a flight from Atlanta. A search warrant was executed on Kesh Air lnternational, in California, on Friday,
June 20, 2008. Defendant Bujduveanu was arrested at his Plantation, FL, home on Saturday, June 21, 2008. Federalagents executed a search warrant at Bujduveanu's home and business immediately aoer his arrest. Agents found
boxes of military aircraft parts stored on Bujduvenau's property, including hundreds of parts for the C-130, the F-5,and other m ilitary aircrao,
Both defendants made their initial appearances in federal court before a United States Magistrate Judge.
The com plaint, charges the defendants with conspiring to illegally export ''defense articles,'' and to export US m ade
aoicles to Iran, and if convided, the defendanl face statutory maximum sentences ranging from 5ve (5) years'imprisonment to twenty (20) yeao' imprisonment, and face fines of up to $1 million.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 29 of 70
01/07/;r0l2 14:54
''Disrupting illegal procurem ent networe that attem pt to circum vent our sanctions against Iran is a top priority ofthe Bureau of Industry and Security,'' said FBI Special Agent in Charge, Michael Johnson.
''This case dem onstrates the importance of team work in preventing diversion of sensitive U.S. goods,n he added.
Special Agent in Charge Christopher Amato, of the Pentagon's Defense Crim inal Investigative Service, SoutheastField Office, said, ''The illegal diversion of U.S. m ilitary technologies through deception, particularly to countries suchas Iran, is treacherous and dangerous to the U.S. and its allies./
According to government om cials, the national security im plications of this (:a% cannot be underestim ated. Thisinvestigation foiled a potentially dangerous scheme to sell and distribute sensitive US military equipment. In the'wrong hands, technology Iike this could be used to inflict harm upon Am erica or its allies. ICE will continue toaggressively pursue those who violate U.S. export laws and ensure the sale and distribution of defense articles isdone in a Iawful manner.
Republic Broadcasting NetworkCase 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 30 of 70
Agentus Bujduveanu, sendvii între FBI ii CIA? I Jurnalul National l Jurnalul National
. * . >it # :r?.4-.t:i .
q.. ' - - --- gstandardele!). . ' .
. ' ' ' . . .
. ' ' .TM - v ' ( v
Miercuri, 26 octombrie 2011 Jurnalul Nallonal Edlia tipâritâ 1 Format PDF X l Abonare Edija tipirltà Bucuresti I()*C 'Y ; Alt ora?. VW' ê6'
* Bib1'.e-. I-r*u t.i .:. .4 Exr- T-S OcI'al M*'' 'H.O'e * - 91- 2P . v. .: ! x w, ar . j. j...
lI+ T'-œ--- Nvvele vise e >. ye co + (zD + DvD** * >'- --
Cauta!
Speciat Bani&Afaceri Viatà sànàtoasà &tiinlà&Tehnicà Timp îiber Cultura Vremea Caleidoscop
25/10/2011 16:02
Agentul Bujduveanu, sendvi: între FBI yiCIA?
Autor: ANDREI BADIN
EXCLUSIK Român prins în scandalul Rarme pentru Irane
Cetâleanul amerion de origine românà Traian Bujduveanu a fost arestat re>nt în Florida,pentru cà ar 5 furnizat *materiale militar Iranului. Bujduveanu este un personaj cu o biografieextrem de interesanM. ln anii '80 era vHut cu yeful serviciilor secrete din Panama, cu douâsëptïmâni Mainte de 21 dom mbrie 1989 se întâlnea ctl Niœ sae Ceaupescu Ia Palatul acestuia
din C'adierul Primâverii din Bucure:ti. Mai apoi era vH ut în Ambasada Coreii de Nord de la
Bucure#i. Dosarul s:u din SKtele Unite œnline date explozke. Jurnajul Nalional a inliat o
investigalie pe a-qt subied yi a dialogat cu Bujduveanu prin intermediul logodnicei sale,Niœleta Mircea. Un adevàrat roman de spionaj. Unul exploziv.
9 octombrie 20()8
rft.z Twitter fn Faœbook cj Email k'ik Imprimâ
lnregistreazâ-te to see what your friendsîmi place. ., . . , . - . like.
0
EXCLUSIV: Român prins în scandalul *'arme pentru Iran''
CeMleanul american de origine românâ Traian Bujduveanu a fost areent recent în Florida,pentru cà ar 5 fumizat wmateriale militare* lranului. Bujduveanu este un personaj cu o biograseextrem de interesanM. ln anii '80 era vëzut cu peful serviciilor secrete din Panarna. cu douâsëptëmâni lnainte de 21 deœ mbrie 1989 se întâlnea cu Nicolae Ceaupescu Ia Palatul aœ stuia
din Cartierul Prim:verii din Bucureyti. Mai apoi era vâzut în Ambasada Cmreii de Nord de la
Bucure4ti. Dosarul sâu din Sltele Unite conline date explozive. Jurnalul National a inetiat o
investigafe pe ar- t subied pi a dialogat cu Bujduveanu prin intermediul Iogodniœi sale,
Nixleta Mircea. Un adevàrat roman de spionaj. Unul exploziv.
Jumalul Nëional a intrat în œlisele unui dosar exploziv. Cetàleanul american de origine român:
Traian Bujduveanu, ln vârstàöe 53 de ani, a fost refmnt arestat în Rorida, pentru câ ar fi fumizat *materiale militare' lranului.
Bujduveanu este un personajcu o biografie extrem de interesantâ.
ln anii 'K era vu ut cu peful sewiciilor secrete din Panama, (x) dou; sâplmâni înainte de 21
decembrie 1989 se lntâlnea cu Nix lae Ceauyescu Ia palatul aœstuia din Caftierul Primâverii din
Bucure@. Mai apoi, era vAut în Ambasada Coreei de Nord de Ia Bucure#. Dosarul sàu dinStatele Unite confne date explozive. Jumalul Nafonal a iniliat o investigak'e pe aœst subied yi a
dialogat cu Bujduveanu prin intermediul Iogodnicei sale, Niœleta Mircea. Un adevàrat roman de
spionaj. Unu! exploziv.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 31 of 70
Agentul Bujduveanu, sendvii între FBl yi CtA? I Jurnabul National I Jurnalul Nationat
ln màrturia fàrxlih ln fata procurorilor, Bujduveanu spune cë Nn fiecare an, Guvemul american
vinde prin licitalii publiœ tone de pârj de piese de schimb pentru avioane, vânzéri efeduate atâtîn SUA, cât yi în stràinàtate. Aceste piese au tehnologie lnvechità pi nu mai sunt folosite de
Guvern. Clienlii care participà Ia aceste licitatii sunt ln general revânz:tori de avioane, dealeri decomponente de avioane, revânzàtori de Omponente eledronice. Dae aœ ste piese ar 5 avut un
impad atât de sever pentru securitatea nalionalà, atunci de ce Guvemul este angajat în astfel devânzàrier. EI explie yi despre e vorba. WH pandabil - este o piesà de avion care poate fi folosit:
O SINGURX DATX dupà care trebuie înlocui? yi distrusi. Dupâ folosire, piesa este denumitâ
SCRAP (piesà veche, uzatâl. O pies; expandabilâ uzatâ NU POATE fi folositë sub nici o form;ca piesà pentru avioane milëare. Aœ asl poate cauza perfomri. ceea ce poate duce Ia
prâbuyirea unui avion*, spune Bujduveanu..
*-'t' s- nariu la serviciilor seerete&în màrturia sa, Traian Bujduveanu a spus c.i
totul ar fi o înscenare f✠tâ de unele servicii secrete amerio ne. wprocklrorkll a dorit së vâ fac;
sâ credeli cà ei nu ytiu cine sunt yi m-au descris drept lcetitean nàscut ln România pi
naturalizat cetàlean american, Iocuind cu mama sa în vârstâ yi 5uI sàu, pe Browardp... (...)Làsali-mâ sà reamintesc Curlii cà va fi destul de dificil s; uKe un bun valoros al SUA atunci *ndnu avea nici un agent imKdant în Coreea de Nord pi Ond singurele informafi pe care se bazau
erau declaralii pi capoade a!e celor 0re fugeau din Coreea de Nord pi a observaliilor satelililor
de urmarire. Partea impodantâ aici este c: procurorul 1-a minlit fàrâ menajamente pe judeetorulfederal O'Sullivan. Nu Onteaz: dacà este o minciunë mare sau o minciunâ mie
, este totuyi o
minciunë. N trebui sâ-mi 5e team; de sistem? Ar trebui sâ ne 5e team; de sistemr, a spus
Bujduveanu în 11a Curlii din Miami. El I-a acuzat pe procuror câ l-a minlit cu bunà >'tiin!à pe
judeetorul O'Sullivan. Printre aRele, în privinla cautiunii. EI spune c,à procurorul a spus c: dacâ
va 5 eliberat pe cauliune *ar 5 fugit imediat în altà 1a**. eoricum, ceea oe proœrorul nu a
menjonat Cuqii este câ multe didre aceste làri pi-ar dori sâ mâ vadâ mod, în timp ce altele pi-ar
dori s; mà întorc sub un axrd bilateral*, a spus Bujduveanu.
FBI versus CIA&NSA
Logodnica sa, Niœleta Mircea, a precizat pentru Jumalul Nalional c,â întreaga afaœre ar 5 un
nou episod al Iuptelor dintre serviciile secrete americane. *Mi-a zis câ sunt mulf ca el Mchiyi. Dar
nu numai CIA, pentru c,i ytiu cà peste CIA mai este o agenlie, NSA. Iar el de aia îmi vorbeyte>,
spune Nicoleta. Mai mult ea spune ceâ afacerile Iogodnicului s:u. inclusiv firma andlyatâ de
vânzarea de piese militare lranului, sunt, de fapt, o ax perire a CIA.
Firmà ClA sub acoe rire ln România
ln mërturia fâckltâ în fala Cuqii din Miami, Bujdeveanu a spus: rrion Aviation Corp (n.red. -
firma sa) a fost o œmpanie de acoperire a operatiilor clandestine din Europa yi din întreaga
lume, iar Guvemul SUA a ytitlt pe deplin de existenla sa. Compania a fost folositâ intens înperioada regimului O munis't din România, iar dupâ e derea comunismului a fost folositâ ca sâ
racoleze agenti din Coreea de Nod, cât :i oficiali nord-œreeni din România, Ungaria yi Austria.
Orion Aviation a fost, de asemenea, antrenatâ în alte operafuni din România, cât yi din alte Wri.Tot timpul ftGuvemul SUA a ytiut de acest Iucrup*.
Otravit în Ambasada Cooii u* Nor: Ia Bucureyti
NMotivul pentru care sunt atât de bolnav este faptul câ am fost otMvit în Ambasada Coreii de
Nord din Bucureyti în timp ee padicipam la o cinâ de protnrnl. Persoana care a fost cu mine a
murit în mai pujn de un an*, este miduria fàcutâ ln fata Cuqii din Miami de Traian Bujduveanu.
Logodnica sa, Nicoleta Mircea, sustine cà oH virea 1ui Traian Bujduveanu ar 5 avut loc în 1992.*Mereu a Iucrat pentru SUA. Vânzând Oreenilor, ajungea sà se infiltreze. Dorea sà se infiltreze.M tfel afla exad ce dotâri au, œ avioane au. De la ambasada Ceoreei de Nord primea Iiste
qshopping Iist>, iar din aœste Iiste 1$ putea da seama de dotârile pe care Ie avea Guvemul de laPhenians iar astfel putea sà ytie de œ ea ce au nevoie gi putea s: îi controleze prin produsele pe
25/10/2011 16:02Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 32 of 70
Agentu! Bujduveanu, sendviy între FB! ji CIA? ! Jurnajul Naljonal j Jurnalul National
care Ie fumiza- povestepte ea. De asemenea, ea spune cà serviciile secrete românepti I-ar fi
urmârit pe Bujduveanu înainte de 1989, cât yi dupà.
SeNiciile secrete de la Bucureyti i-au informat ge omologii s;i americani c; ar fi asociat
serviciilor secrete nord-œreene pi a Iivrat W ashingtonului informâri despre vizitele acestuia în
ambasada Iui Kim Ir Sen de Ia Bucureyti. Americanii nu au reaclionat. Serviciile secrete de Ia
Bucureyti au revenit. lmpreunà cu agenf sud-coreeni, l-au fotœ rasat pe Bujduveanu Ia
Budapesta yi Viena, unde o.a Mtâlnit cu agenli nord-coreeni. Americanii nu I-au arestat.
-X!' ' ' Pe urmele agenjlor românl- pre adivitâlile sale Mt----fRomânia. TraKn Bu#' tlveanu ne.a Omunicat prin
intermediul lYenicei sale: 5n legàturâ (x1 ,- .. ce ficea ln România ;e timpul Iui rx u- , misiunea
lui era sâ monibri-ye eventualii spioni care înœ rcau sâ se Infiltreze în SUA, ln general pera ne care
Iucrau Ilentru oompanii de imrxd-exx rt lnœ rca së ideneœ aœste Nrsoane, pentru ca mai apoi sâ se
înoe> kansformarea Ior din spionl rentru România ln spioni pentru Statele UnKe*. Bujduveanu a întàrit
cu ar--e prilej declarajile antedroare, conform erora a Il- t pentru CIA, dar pi Nntru NSA.
25/10/2011 16:02
Blografle zbuçlumal
Anil '80 11 prind ;>e Traian Bujd' uveanu în Panama, în aD-numita *Base M w.a Tocumenr - care se aflâ
pe Aeropoltul Intemam' nal Tocumen din Panama C'Ity. în prezenta mae lui Espinosa, Kful selvidilor
v rete aIe Republidi Panama. Anii '90 îl gleA.- pe Traian Bujduveanu ln Ambasada Republici
Demxrate Congo, în Washington DC, ln prgw nla ambasadomlui Republidi Congo # a altor
personal'e mlitte Ongoleze. Este fotYraflat în hotel end era ln prezenla delegalWi Republli Congo.
Delegaje œmpue printre aYi din minKtrul Jusbl iei Congoleze - Teo Mwamba, r- orul privat al
pree intelui Laurent nbila # de Celestin - agent Ia - 1* % najo' nalâ a Republtii Congo.
îmi place înregistreazà-te to see what your friends Iike.
Tagurl av lae: bujduveanu 1 traian 1 nicoleta 1 buoureyti I secrete 1 romania l nord 1 piese 1 ambasada I ne-au 1 Nicoleta Mircea l special
Comentarii
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 33 of 70
Agentul Bujduveanu, sendviy între FBI yi CIA? l Jurnalul Natlonal I Jurnalul National 25/10/2011 16:02
Deœmbrie' 1989. Cu dou; sâpêmâni Mainte de Revolulia român:, Traian Bujduveanu se
întâlnepte la Bucureyti cu didatorul Nicolae Ceauyescu la resedin!a acestuia din cadierul
Primâverii. Era împreunâ cu mai muqi oameni de afaceri americani. Se punea Ia cale o afacere
în domeniul Iui Bujduveanu: industria aviatie. 19 ani mai târziu, Ia 21 iunie anul curent,
Bujduveanu este areestat într-o operaliune specialà a FBI. Este acuzat 0.1 ar 5 œmercializatmateriale militare pentru regimul islamic de Ia Teheran.
Logodnica sa, Nicolel Mircea, spune cà a fost operaliune ieyiti din œmun. Casa lui Traian
Bujduveanu din Florida a fost Iuatâ cu asalt Ia 6 diminea!a de foade muqi agenf. *Au spart u:a
de Ia camera mamei lui. Am K ze. Yi pe acolo au intrat. Eu am crezut c: este o bombà. Asta m-atrezit din somn. Eram lmpreunâ în dormitor. Dupà (>-1* au intrat pi am veut mascali. Eram
siguM cà sunt teroril... Ne-au întrebat despre arme, droguri yi nmau spus sà stâm cu mâinilesus. Vedeam doar armele lor. Am crezd c,à ne vor banii yi apoi ne ornoari*, povesteyte Nicoleta.
''Nmau zis sà ne dâm jos din pat Fiecare pe padea sa de pat 4i sâ ne întindem pe jos cu fala în
jos $, din nou, ne-au Mtrebat de arme yi de dre uri... A*i ne-au Iegat cu niyte câtuye din
plastic. Eu o mai am pe a mea, pentru c,ë m-au stëns foarte KI* cu ea yi când mi-au dat-o jos
m-au tàiat Ia mânà. Iar dup; aceea I:e mine m-au ajutat sâ mâ ridic yi m-au lntors cu fa1 etreei. Abia atunci am vizut pe mascali scria FBI. @i am fost fericiM cë nu mà omoaM. 1ar dincamera mamei - o auzeam cum 11 strigâ pe
Traian. Mama lui nu ytie englezepte, e oarbà. Nu ne-au dat voie Ia înœ put sâ mergem la ea. Ne-
au spus cà au mandat de arestare pe numele Iui. $i e,i au yi mandat de xrchezilie.
$i Traian l&a zis s: ia tot, c.â nu are nimic de ascuns. Dar de ce nebunia asta? Puteau sâ vinâ yis; batâ la uyà. Era aœlayi lucru. Ni s-a spus cei a4a vor sâ ne protejeze*v mai povestepte
Nixleta. Ea spune cë nu a aflat nici pânà în ziua de azi de cine a vrut sâ % protejeze FBI-uI.Câteva zile, NiO leta nu a ytiut nimic despre Iogodnicul ei. A asat c: Traian fusese dus Ia
închisoarea federalâ din Miami. Dar nu i s-a permis accesul. I s-a spus doar câ poate veni Ia
tribunal, unde sà afle acuzaliile.
Acuzajiile
Pe scurt, Traian Bujduveanu este acuzat câ ar fi vândut unui cetàlean american de origineiraniani. Saied Keshari, mai multe piese de avion e.a* ar fi O nsiderate militare. Logodnica sa
sustine câ procurorii nu au demonstrat cà produsele pe care autoritilile americane cred c.â le-avândut Buld' uveanu au fost yi vândute. Ea spune câ în arvmt moment probele prezentate sunt
doar Ymail-uri, œncret, Oresponden!a dintre cei doi. Bujduveanu ne-a transmis, însë prin
logodnio 0, câ acuzatiile ar 5 false pi cà nu i-a vândut Iui Saied piesele reclamate. *sunt pieseférâ valoare. Cost: IQ de dolari bucatae, spune Nio leta Mirœ a. Mai mult piesele enumerate de
acuzare, 7 la numàr, sunt produse în anii 1950-1960 yi nu se mai fabrie în prezent. Mai mult,
Traian Bujduveanu spune c: produsele respedive se folosesc în prezent (n material didactic,deci nu se mai K t monta pe nici un avion, în nici un e-qy pe unul miliKr, aD œm spun
atltoritâjle americane. Bujduveanu mai spune cà, oricum, piesele nu sunt arme. De exemplu, o
piesâ este un pulub (boR), al1 este o garnituM (diaphragm) care, de fapt, este o bucat: decauciuc, alta este un întrerupâtor (switch assembly) e,a* are aproximativ 2 cm, alta este formaê
din ni&te ire O re fac 1*511 între ni&te piese (hamess assembly) etc. De asemenea,
Bujduveanu susfne c,à nu îl cunoayte pe americanul de origine iranianà, prima datâ cunoscându-
I la proces, yi câ a din dnt cu acesta doar prin œmail. Mai mut Bujduveanu susline cà i-ar fi datiranianului niyte preluri foade mari. Keshari Iocuiepte în California, în Novado. Venise în Miami
împreunâ cu solia pi cei doi copii deoarece sotia sa trebuia sà fae nipte investigalii medicale. A
fost arestat pe aeroportul din Miami în prezenta familiei. Keshari a cerut ca sâ 5e judecat în
Califomia, dar nu s-a acceptat. De asemenea, instanla nu a arm ptat nici flxarea unei cautiuni
pentru Bujduveanu.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 34 of 70
U. S. Bureau of Industry and Securitv - DOJ Press Release - April 9, 2009 30/10/201.1. 15:37
About BIS Home > News > DoJ Press Release
New s w.e-n*''- 'v-'. x. *' *7..
t.r$' 'X'... : ,;k *i:.
Press Releases .'' è'.jJ .
. ySpeeches ; -'
y;éTesti m ony 17 ' ' .1..,6
i #k ;.P bl ications 6 JJ tu a4
,u. y tki u. #>
Electronic FOIA
Archives Uas. Depaem ent of JusticeUnited States Attorney's Om ce
Policies AndRegulations
Licensing
For Im m ediate Release: June 11, 2009Contact - BIS Public Affaio : 202-482-2721
Defendant Sentenced in Conspiracy to Export
M ilitary A ircraft Parts to Iran
MIAMI, FL. - Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting United States Attorney for theSouthern District of Florida, David Kris, Assistant Attorney General forNatlonal Security, Michael Johnson, Special Agent in Charge, U.S.Sem inars And Training
International Departm ent of Com m erce, Om ce of Export Enforcem ent, AnthonyProgram s V.Mangione, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Im m igration and Custom s
Enforcement, Office of Investigations, and Am ie R. Tanchak, ResidentDefense IndustrialAgent in Charge
, U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Crim inalBase Program s Investigative Service
, announced today that defendant Traian Bujduveanuwas sentenced in Miam i federal court for his role in a conspiracy to illegally
export military and dual use alrcraft parts to Iran. Bujduveanu's co-defendant, Hassan Keshari, and his corporation, Kesh AirInternational, were sentenced in May 2009.
Com pliance And
Enforcem ent
U. S. District Court Judge Patricia Seitz sentenced Bujduveanu to thirty-five(35) months' imprisonment, followed by three (3) years of supervisedrelease. Bujduveanu pled guilty on April 2, 2009, to Count 1of the Indid m ent, which charged conspiracy to export and cause the exportof goods from the U.S. to the Islam ic Republic Iran, in violation of the
Embargo imyosed upon that country by the U.S. and in violation ofthe Internatlonal Em ergency Econom ic Powers Act, Mtle 50, United States
Code, 1705(a), and to export and cause to be exported defense articles, inviolation of the Arm s Export Control Act, Title 22, United States
Code, Section 2778(b), aII in violation of Title 18, United States Code,Sed ion 371.
As part of his plea, Bujduveanu, a Romanian national and naturalized U.S.citizen, adm itted that he used his Plantation, FL, corporation, Orion
Aviation, to sell aircrao parts to Keshari for purchasers in Iran and
exjorted the aircraft parts to Iran by way of freijht forwarders in Dubai,Unlted Arab Em irates. Am ong the aircraft parts Illegally exported to Iranthrough the conspiracy were parts designed exclusively for the F-14 FighterJet, the Cobra AH-I Attack Helicopter, and the CH-53A Military Helicopter.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 35 of 70
US Man Imprisoned For Selling Military Parts To Iran - kodoom-com
Kodoom.com - Persian lnformation Hub
# # # #
Home Events Restaurants
kc ... ' Qt. .' ,;.. r2:
L ) ,.t. ..u' .. '
''. . . . '1 ', . - - ; . ... . .
;..j. . .yyj. ,j .. :) .... .;..,,.s,,. p > . yjL<.>I nts 4.*1sent to your Em il
, Irnninns. ï
j '') l ''I k....; . . .. :. . . . .. ? &? > !? 1 j ' il.. tf L r1'1 :' ' ? i. . k t
'
iIE .
'
.
'
..'
'
..
'
. jj !r:.. . n :' j 1 :%j '
j! l IiDariush Kiosk Band :
Mehrjui '
C 7 m ' '!'
j k Ii I ' !' I i' I 1
1. l.1 .l ) L
The Kamkars Benyamin
Bahadori
Related News: (4 articles)
@ ! ç h 17 :t të t 1 (r'a :', )'t2 : '.! 5. '''.' ' (
US M an Im prisoned For Selling M ilitary
Pnvtq To Iran
US Man Imprisoned For Selling Military Parts To IranNasdaq - June 11. 2009-A U.S. man of Romanian rlœqzx t was serftenr'.M to 35 months pri= and thre
years probation for his role in a K heme to ilkv lly expod milëary and dual use
aircraft xrts to lran, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday. Traian Bujduveanupled guilty on April 2 to charges of conspiracy to exm d and cause the exm rt of
g* s from the U.S. to lran. In violatbn of a U.S. trade embargo. Bujdtlvœ u - aRomanian national and naturalize U.S. cRken - admitted he sold aircraft pare to a
U.S. man of Iranian dn.qrw.<< Ha- n Keshari. A% r ...
iFeatured t;
'
' !videos of Eadhquake in j. . , j ,1q Eastem Turkey 1 i
i iè
'
!à 22 hours ago l 1!
'
1 li J
'
j
'
!t'. !
'
.. IGoogoosh and Shajarian ! lI t 11mee
$ t!. Od 23, 2011
f l! l 1l1
' Marco simoncelli's death -- n l' !
'
I' in Malaysia Gp 1, ! !l i
l Ij Oct 23, 2011 I t1
*
'
'
lh
'
:- lpq . . . . !
i i? More ,, iq
'
..!.
. y , y.
Us-Romanian citizen sentenced to 3 years for conspiring to
export ...LA-rimes - June 11, 2009
MIAMI (AP) - A man with dual Romanian and U.S. r'.d1' 'yenship has =--n sentenein Miami to almost th- years in prison for his role in a plot to * 1 prohibœ airoraft
pnrln to Iran. Traian Bujduveanu (FOF ANN Be '-d> 'VAY-nu) was sentenen ue ay by U.S. Distrid Judge Patricia M liy' . He pleade guilty in April to a single
to a single conspiracy count.
4 lmtes't News lr
'
1; 1 lo Iran s press history on display at ;
?; Tehran intl. fair lpress w - one Nour ago) :(
. ;
'
;:. .
o Alleged conspiracy that sent btlmb tlcomponent.s from U.S. to lran is ... 1
)(CNN - One hour ago) i
l . Provoking a path to Persia
(rehran Times - one hour ago)
Man gets nearly 3 years in lran aircraft plotYahoo! News - June 11, 2009
MIAMI - A rren with dual Romanian and U.S. rwd1' 'yenship has % sentence in to
almost thre years in prison for his role in a plot to e.e11 prohibited aircraft o rts to
Bujduveanu (Fray-'ANN Booj-doo-'vAY-nul was Ontenœ Thure y W . Hepleaded guilty in April to a single to a single = spiracy oount. Also pl- ding guilty
and sent to prison in the plot was Iranian-bom Hncu n Keshari. Prosecutors say
both men were illegally helping 1* obtain parts for such a1rt2ra% as the :Quick Poll ;. !
News of Iranls Plot to Aeeessirlate
œ udl Ambae--=or Real or#
Fabrio- :
8 Fabricated and political
O Real
Romanian-American sentenced in lran jet pads plotReuters - June 1 1, 2009
The Romanian-born owner of a U.S. aviation company was sentenœ Thure y to
nearly three years in prison for conspiring to ship parl for sghterjets and othermilitary aircraft to Iran, pro- dors said. Traian BuA' tlveanu plz- e guilty in Apri1
to one count of conspiracy to export > s in vice nn of the U.S. embargo againstIran. Bujduveanu and his Ompany, Plantation, Florida-iue Orion AviaNœ . werecharged Iast year along with another avktion company owner, Hx qnn Keshari and
his Kesh Air Intemational, in a plot to help Iran ...
Cast your vote to .'.w- the r<tvtlllts:
Previous Poll: o Will lran Qualify for 2014
Soccer Worldcup?
M edia
245 broadcasting of Persian
W /Radios
Sign Up to see what your friends Iike.
25/10/2011 16:07
œwaot.i ) EnglishLogin 1 Reister I Log I 11
Search Entire site
News lranians Encyclopedia Features Media Tools
Gopyhght @ Ke oomm m, AI Kghts reserved.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 36 of 70
Exhibit 4
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 37 of 70
CaltrY Inzlngm Agemcy
#A : Y
WaA #ORDA N
M arch 15, 2010
Mr. Traian Bujdtweanu5601 W . Broward Blvd.Plantauon, FL 33317
Reference: 13-2010-04XX)3
Dear Mr. Bujduveanu:
W e received your 5 November 2œ 9 letter providing additional information pertaining to
your M vacy Act request referenced above.
Since you have provided the necessary information, we processed your request in
accordance with the Freedom of Informntion Act and the Privacy Act. W e searched for CIA-originated responsive records that might reflect an open or otherwise acu owledged Agency
afsliation existing through 12 January 2010, the date we accepted your M uest. W e were unable to
locate any such information or records.
W ith respect to responsive records that would reveal a classified connection to the CIA, in
accordance with section 3.6(a) of Executive Order 12958, as amended, the CIA can neither conflrmnor deny the existence or nonexistence of records responsive to your request. n e fact of theexistence or nonexistence of requested records is currently and properly classified and relates to
CIA intelligence sources and methods information that is protected from disclosure by section 6 of
the C1A Act of 1949, as amended. n erefore, you may consider this portion of the response a
denial of your request pursuant to FOIA exemptions 09(1) and (1943), and PA exemptions û)(1)and (k)(1). 1 have enclosed an explanation of these exemptions for your reference and mtention.
You have the right to appeal this response within 45 days of the date of this letter. You
may address your appeal to the Agency Relemse Panel, in my care. Please explain the basis of yourAPPPOI'
W e apprec' iate your patience while we were processing this request.
Sincerely,
# .Delores M . Nelson
Information and Privacy Coordinator
Enclosure
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 38 of 70
OFFICE OF THE D IRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTJ'NZ DC 20511
Mr. Traian Bujduveanu5601 W . Broward Blvd.
Plantation, FL 33317
Reference: DP-2010-00002
Dear Mr. Bujduveanu:
n is is a fmal response to your 25 September 2009 mquest to the Director of Nadonal
Intelligence IOD& wherein you requested Nnformalon on yourser '
QA2 1 1 2212
Yottr request wms protesged in accordnnce with the FOlA, 5 U.S.C. j 552, as amendedyand Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. j 55% . ODNI conducted a search for unclmssmed records responsiveto your request and no records were located.
Pursuant to FOIA Exemptions 1 and 3, 5 U.S.C. j 552 (1941) and (3), the ODM canneither conflrm nor deny the existence of clmssifed records responsive to your request.
Exem puon 1 protects informauon which is currently and properly classified in accordnnce with
Executive Order 13526. Exempuon 3 protecl information that is sm cm cally covered by statute.In tllis cœse, the applicable stamte is the National Security Act which protects informntion
peHnining to intelligence sources and methods. Accordingly, no clmssiled records systems were
searched and this response should not be taken ms an indicadon that records do or do not exist
with respect to yom. request.
Should you wish to appeal the denial of your request, plemse do so in writing to:
Oflice of the Director of National Intelligence
Information M anagement OfliceW ashington, DC 20511
Appeals must be received within 45 days of the date of this letter. lf you have any
questions, please call the Requester Service Center at (703) 275-2210.
Sincerely, ,
/ .
/*.
Jo F. Hacket
Director, H ormation M anagement Office
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 39 of 70
Mr. Traian Bujduveanu5601 W . Broward BlvdPlantatiow FL 33317
Dear Mr. Bujduvemm:
n is resw nds to your rN uest under the Pdvacy Act and Freedom of Infonnaion Act dated
September 22, 2009. Therein you requested records conev ing yourself I apoloA e for thedelay in responding to your request that wms caused by the need to consult w1111 another oo ce
within the agency.
JUL : 9 2010
A search of DG 's systems of records locate 5ve documents responsive to your request. Of
these responsive records, one document was refr ed to the DepsM ent of Homeland Secudty forits review and dired response to you. n is refc al is necesse because the documents did not
orio ate w11h DIA. Should you wish to contad th= th* Hdress is:
Depsrtment of Homeland Saum'ty245 M urray Drive, SW
STOP-0550
W mshingtow D.C. 20528-0550
A11 substantive poG onj of four documents are not releasable. The withheld poG ons are
exempt 9om relemse purslunt to Exempions 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. jj 5521)(4). Exempéon 4applies to commercial informatiow the disclosure of which would cause compeééve hsrm to the
owner of that informauon or would injure the United States Govemment's ability to obtain thesame informaion in the futare.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 40 of 70
If you are not satissed w1t11 this adion, you may exerdse your right to appeal by writing tothe address below and refelving to cmse number PA-G 0-2010. Your appeal must be pose arkedno later th= 60 days aher the date of tbis letten
Defense Intelligence Agency
ATrN: DAN-IA (FOIA)W mshington, D.C. 20340-5100
Sincerely,
, gwXleska Y. Witilamschiefi Fre om of hformah'on Ad Staf
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 41 of 70
k> .+zb u # *
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDEQCE: CI AM IFICAMON:Q Telo Q Im e kte Q TOP SK RUQ Fo lme Q P> D SK RETa AIRTBL o Roœ e D CONFIDENTIAL
Q UNCY E F T O@ - Q UNOLAS<
6/1/89De:'D.
o To, ozRscmoR, esz tlElkvk(Aœœexœzow, zxmo-zc)
$
( g jé.. - -. -..-ERœ 4-...-...-......-. m-..<....-.
oA=: n4-z6-zQlQ(S1 k ctxsszpmm :T 6caz4 uc bav/aub/xa
z MIAMI) R'ISDV' l*4 (C15 DECIASSIFT 1V1 04-26-2035
This communication is classi Jied '' +.p-6 -
e
1 Encloaed for the Bureau is an original plus
seven co iea of x detailtng information provided'
43) '' s1b69 ReouEsT oe Tss B
uasaur s7c
10 zt ts requestld that FBIHQ distribut. copiea
of th. encloaed LsM to aoorooriate aqencies.11 - - - -
m pwm w ccm w mAn 1#AD
- MINISTRATIVE z - 71: Ig e tm lnb12 - pp xxnw v w sz
( S ) ''Te -l.a.-.eneiosee-L.sy-4.s.13
1 4. j , .. .
.. v 4k: j , )
,- sureau (sne. 7)> ïls . xtaz
KlMrmjh Classlj16 ( a ) pxjo j j ;.
% +17 ;uG s 1as> A 3 + c/:Z
-,s t w /y.s. vypygqjn œ ---,a / s usns
20
A21. % -
G TresmMed pApproved;
(Number) mme)N . , jw o . yqw ,q
H 1FBI
# @k.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 42 of 70
G
5-1 V (> . 1$ *3) Atî IM IY W OK Cor Ax
IEM IF IS W CLAD IFI> EyCIPT= O 0W O W S:
e.&. DFPARTMY OF JUO CEFEDERAK :URG U * INVO TIGATION
W AOKOK'QTON. D.c :M **
0% Ie rmaeon notclasslœ .
To DirectorCentral Intelligence AsencyWashington , D.C. 20505
Attn: Soviet/East European Division
a- 7/17/89
F* F4* % * - .
: BY uAo' FY MAK
P y cou-
j g ) .- Re --.. b 1.
DAV : 04-26-2010
CKAMSIPTO 5Y 6:324 uc %%m?s* JtnM M V : l.4 (c)DECKAM ID 0Kz :4-26-2035
A: m% *. nolae : a d- of Infm tlon cxe e In ths en- - oh- N. - f- ''S- *t .- œ
1 TNe *- m- -aa- 1* fcne - to yx u d contans nlGm- of - * m- * > Agm .
2 Me e cœ- m a- -'-'-'=- - n< - e mma*d x - r- - - -a- - / - F@
3 Ml- e œ - d n aœ œ me- e x e me mae d- Y lre - * 1 - ue m > * nmth a No- ue > o- > >x*> we- m a- - of m@ F&
5 T>e Y tltle ol U.S. pera s nol sel fe e y be obtae d those pera 's den- : +* n- *œ *r- te e - :-n. -e- 1*- *. e to efœce-' -1 1- orpr- tacr- K t- iœ - e*r- 'eby - A- . fe- 'd * Iel.r to FR H*** '- G A% : . Mle - - - (.. * 1. -' o 2. .' X 1. ' Cr- d- es* @ * ' '' --œP e h * tdle *r* rm re e th* r- eKh e -''=' '
6
* M> l7œ m M * AD*= N-f -ê
enc 2
C* 'g
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 43 of 70
*.Att T*FnpW*1Q0# COWTATMFDHEEZIV IS BFCLâSZIFIID EXOZPT
5.182 (% . :.1**3) qworpp sHcw cqw pvzgo
U.$. DEFARI'MENT * JO TICEFo m k BQREA: SF INVEATIGATION
WA/HINGTON. p.ç. * 5::
DARI: 04-26-2Q10CLAJSIFTKb 3Y 60324 uc 5e7/1ab/tf
QpAs:r: l.4 (c)DECtAJSIFY 0f: 04-26-2035
xe 7/17/89
FBI F* œ m*
BY . lAln> MAK
K eY cœ aeR
To nirectorBureau of Intelligence and ResearchDeaprtment of StateWashtngton , D.c. 20520
Re
( 3 ) --r'---b 1
M * * . nltat- l e 11*- of mlor- contanel m te e- - ncatm ar* * **'*'u ''SU *l ' u* o
1 R * atte e e e dA e Iue-- to yœ u d c- - Inf- - of M e* ** ml*re l lo yœ r A>
2 ui- jm cone jn a'-- -u- = m@- -,- - - :- o y noj :@ <.**- -e œ e @ rK - g & m *l% t WG3W ;# Y 1W* FBI
3 Kf- - D- - m .>- me- e um e H m e de ved t- efr- m*y * b@ M 'n * - +e * >ose m G +- > >x ee nq mmoe - a- ovà of ** FBI
4 Th* * Me* Qf Une Soœ: - ** * IUSPERSI men- n *''''M'* e - m ee as f-
5 T* ld- - - of U S perm not s.t 10r* may b. ah--*d / '- pera : ldentl- e@ nece- toun=''''' - themf- e - e% d*> *.e to enlece ee- e - orpr- l a= * 11 lhe- ld- '-lar*ro eby #oG Agex y. f- * l*tte M FBl H* .*Hu . Alm lnde*g- r>' :- (. C#1 . CI.Z. .- Cl-3). R- - --*lnee* e * ' ' ' *- e h * td- e@ r- ed a me r-- % e ne ed.
. 6
Y W lBO1
. 821C- - -
ne eo . OADR*
. - n R .
Fede H œ d - o
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 44 of 70
Exhibit 5
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 45 of 70
. X .Q a - %& w .- WY + . e, . * *' . - . . @..w. . ê* Q *
F > @ -.. - . .
Re N* -0UG m n u # W
1 d R * ' '-P * * * *= p on a a pn ge = y be > o by Co ns* ,e ' ''- --
. .M er $
. . -
. -
. * --
.1 V XR W* @l*Y*O Of S ' * * * * * * * *y ox or = œ : 1 c: reö * for ie ts of>-
e to ke m ' - b - - '' %oieo, b: y t or y 1 Ce (cpartlclmtmm
lunders*ad and a- to lbide byle fozoe g coe do- durûzg- mypedo of Rnm- CnnFm- entk.. e , -** * ** <r' t
.e--3 !. I * 1 - de atmrapprovedresidene.- ats-e 1 w . .el N wrl
, W. aex'k woex !.Ct -s2x>o .l .
2. I mnl coe d m- lfh a Iawful m- er.vf 3 'T7 .<'3. Imoae tpe ce Mmnrr.mrnbaea< verzfyo' ' myp- ecmyhomee gtmyjobA lo to
mwmen akW % atmyplaœ of x W- we e * a = d> > yfore pe e m'lk wh= ' v vide xpjes otmyGlo aebglo Y r- -mv' badone Ifmye
cdnlne-- is el-= '-nymoite l am emy-oan,e xotwveeece wat-' .oOra telo ae-YWXX * *OR
p
%@
v/ T
v g 6. I m'P not ou orpossess uy de yweaponorknoe glybe ia tu'compuy of a peoonpossexie O same.I ... -
g I wiE r- m' A dily employed :t- . & 14 snd wgluot-hxv a joymentwithlut> œappmval of r Ahnbadon xac .. -
p 8. I mnl notknoe glyassxkte p=o= He ga M'mlnxl -Y nœfequ=tplaco wh- jie&lxe-' ' '- aa=
4. IwizKceptthevlsil of Cc* mhnRnopœso=olto myjob site and M=
Ie nG o tu rrrAwvbedoauleqx- -
. J. A . we yfor- ' epro- redewsaadpro-
pae aeœ, udmnreoRO iflnt- di O so. '
a.
@T: 7. I wnlrotdnwl dcoholilbev- of anye i= winl-erany eskblislm-. suc: asbaa ot e or Ares, wllem theYe e or consa- en of alcohoëo b
ev=. gu onthepr- 'w is ie prY bwo s of * estabsvhment. - *
.,l0. Exceptaa- ,w lly:nlhamwza Iwm notuseozpox sm -mtics
.or o- conkollel sabs-cewmrw hOpresence ofC 3 erxons pox se the same. . 'P
@ . .
r p.v- lï. Ia- O t dx- - Home conFm- -periodylwiuz= e atmyphx of = M=cl except ror- lo- nt 'mle-. raml W
gikenspecilcp- no do oie- se-
' '
rj y 12. I >411 not won or drM a 'motor veltidewithoul CCM appmvatr * .
13 I w5l abide by sp,W 'R1 m' e 'edom givea to me by * ccœrobatiom Ge. ele ndc = ni-eng prom m e dgation, etcorj ; -
<: g 14. I m71 suY tto lmw lye oralcoMl toe g as o œted by the Ccm >mbatiom I mnd- wd G t ipge on of pqppy seedl = food produ- m?y result inposigve t
estr- . '
x ') j 15. I agree to pay subsistente foz tke costof my pecipaqon ln Hcmc Coe ement-jr n l6. Iunderstand O tlampersonally- onsible for allcosts of myhousinp meals md general subsi- ce
I GIIy qnier- nd thatwizful faiure to report as requiredyuu utkonw- ckange ofru dencw employmenk orfailure te e ee e hform Cenlr ste of mywhereabovey could coltstitqte an escape frem federal euxody.
I
Resident*s Si- - ' '' 5ateR > z.M . X A
Approved (CCC Dkectorl , . $ ' 4 - 1 - - ' '
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 46 of 70
* U-S. Depar+--nt of JusticeFederal Bureau of Prisons
Program
Statem eht
OPI: CCD
.--- .w : 7a2o.o1
DATE: September 6, 1995
SnRTRCT: Home Confinement
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE . To establish policy and procedures forreferral and placement of pre-release inmates in Community
Corrections home confinement programs.
Title 18, Section 3624(c) of the United States Code allowsinmates sentenced under ''old lawe and ''new law'' statutes, to be
placed on home confinement for pre-release purposes:
(c) Pre-release custody.--The Bureau of Prisons shall, toth* extont practieabie, assure thlt a prisonlr serving atezm of ixe risonment spends a reasonabie part: not to exceedsix months, of the Aast 10 per eentum of the term to beserv.d undar conditiona that will afford the prisoner a
reasonable oppor-îna'ty to adjust to and prepare for his re-entry into the c--- mnq'ty. The aukhority provided by thissubsection may be used to place a prisoner on homeconfin----t. The United States Probation System shall, tothe extent praeticable, offer assistanee to a prisonerduring such pre-release custody .
Ordinarily, the length of placement ordinarily is limited to thelast 10 percent of the inmate's term to be served, or six months,whichever is less. An exception is inmates with sentences of
more than 12 months but not more than 30 months who havesuccessfully completed the institutional phase of the Intensive
Confinement Centers (ICCs) program. Bureau authority for ICCS isestablished by Title 18, U.S.C., Section 4046.
The Bureau does not have statutory authority to designate a home
confinement program for an inmate at the beginning of his or hersentence. This is supported in Title 18, U.S.C.r Section 3621,which requires that the Bureau designate any available o-nxl or
correetional facility as the place of a prisoner's imprisonment.
Home confinement is a time of testing and an opportunity forinmates to assume increasing levels of personal responsibilitywhile providing sufficient restriction to promote community
safety and continue the sanction of the sentence.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 47 of 70
8P-5548.073SEP 1995
P.S. 7320.01September 6, 1995
Attachment A , Page 1
AnooV uvuY
EoME C9NFTMRMPMY AND COMMUKITY CONTROL
1, ,
NameF
Register NlAmher
hereby agree to abide by the following Conditions related to mylegal participation on home confinement.
I understand that my participation on home confinement will be analternative to placement in a Community Corrections Center for no
more than the last six (6) months or 10% of my sentencetwhichever is less. I am aware that I will legally remazn in thecustody of the Bureau of Prisons and/or the U.S. Attorney Generaland that failure to remain at the required locations may result
in disciplinary action and/or prosecution for escape.
I agree to report to my assigned probation officer or thecontractor's facility immediately upon reaching my release
destination .
I understand that if I decline to participate in the recommendedhome confinement program I may face administrative reassignmentout of the community corrections program .
I agree that during the home confinement period, I will remain atmy place of residence: except for employment, unless I am givenpermission to do otherwise. I also understand that I will berequired to pay the costs of the program based on my ability to
pay-
I also agree to maintain a telephone at my place of residence
without ''call forwarding'v a modemy ''Caller ID'' or portablecordless telephones for this period.
I also agree that, if my confinement is to be electronicallymonitored, I will wear any electronic monitoring devicerequired, follow procedures specified and will not have ''call
forwarding'' on my telephone.
#'
Name Date
Staff Witness (Printed Name, Signature, Facility)Original to Central File. Copy to CCM.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 48 of 70
P.S. 7320.01September 6, 1995
Attachment B, Page 1
M QW V-D R Hœ CONFI** - PR>
1. The following procedures apply to al1 inmates who areapproved for placement on home confinement.
1. The provider is not required to provide megls, medicaltreatment, clothing or incidentals, laundry services orother subsistence items to inmates on home confinement.
2. The provider shall maintain documentation of a1l staffcontacts with inmates on home confinement.
3. The provider shall notify the CCM immediately of anymisconduct or failure of an inmate on home confinementto comply with Home Confinement Conditions.
The provider is not required to reserve a bed at thecenter for an inmate on home confinement .
5. The provider shall collect 25% of each epployedresident's weekly gross income, rounded down to a wholedollar amount. Residents who are not employed, but whohave other means of financial support shall contributean amount determined appropriate by the provider andapproved by the CCM. These fees shall be used to defrayprogram costs. Individual subsistence collectionsshall not exceed the weekly cumulative contract per
diem rate (i.e.e the daily rate x 7). All fundscollected from those in BOP programs shall be deducted
from the monthly billings submitted to the BOP- Insome cases, inmate subsistence contributions wouldcover the entire cost of home confinement. If themonitoring is provided by the USPO, subsistencecollection shall not exceed the cost of the electronicmonitoring equipment . The respective USPO shallinstruct those in Usps-operated home confinementprograms in the appropriate payment procedures.
6. An inmate serving a BOP sentence who fails to remain atthe specified location may be considered an escapee.A1l escapes shall be immediately reported to the CCM.
Inmates on home confinement shall maintain a 9:00 P.M.to 6:00 A .M . curfew each day, unless an exception is
recommended by the provider and approved by the CCM .
8. Drug and alcohol testing and counseling requirementsshall apply to inmates on home confinement.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 49 of 70
P.S. 7320.01September 6, 1995
Attachment B, Page 2
II. The following conditions shall apply to those programs thatdo not use electronic equipment to monitor compliance with
the conditions of home confinement.
The provider's staff shall telephonically contact theinmate at random hours each day at home, at work, orb0th .
2. Staff shall visit inmates on home confinement at their
homes and at their places of employment at least onceeach week.
3. Inmates on home confinement shall return to thefacility at least twice each week for routine progressreviews, counselingy urine testing and other requiredprogram participation .
111. The conditions in Section 11 (above) also apply to thoseprograms that do use progrnmmed contact devices, and to
those programs that use continuously signalling or hybriddevices that are not monitored 24 hours per day, 7 days per
week .
Electronic equipment is atelephone calls.
substitute onlv for the random
IV. The followin: conditions shall apply to those homeconfinement programs that: 1) voluntarily choose to comeunder these conditions, 2) use continuously signalling orhybrid devices (see definitions) and 3) monitor the outputof the central computer and respond to violations'z4 hours
per day, 7 days per week.
The provider shall have an operations or proceduresmanual specifying the manner in which the program willoperate. This manual shall be reviewed by the CCM,conform to the minimum standards specified below andserve as the basis for monitoring the operations of thehome confinement program.
The provider's operations/procedures manual shallinclude their plan of action when a violation is noted .
Provider staff shall have at least one in-personcontact with the offender per week.
a. At least one contact each month shall take placeat the offender's residence, and one at the place
of employment .
A1l contacts shall be documented.
2.
3.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 50 of 70
P.S. 7320.01September 6, 1995
Attachment B, Page 3
C. The contact shall include, but not be limited topvisual inspection of any equipment, verificationof continued employment and hours worked,verification of residence and of participation in
any other required programs or treatmentactivities.
The provider shall review the inmatefs monthlytelephone bill to ensure that it has been paid and thatthe service does not include call forwarding or other
unauthorized services.
6. The inmate is expected to remain at his/her residendeat a11 times except when he is at work, when travelingto and from work or when engaging in other approvedactivities. The provider's plan may include someopportunity for the offender to earn a reduction in the
hours during which activity is restricted.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 51 of 70
Exhibit 6
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 52 of 70
Dismas t7hsrides - FreshsM Page t of 1
Mova EFr Reouo T '
Sta# Adams, Lashonda
Client Bujduveanu, TraianRequested Date
Requee d ForDate
Loca:ons
10/10/2010
GeneralName stre a- t> SoRomanian oe odox Church 6232 Nllmore Skeet Hol> e FL 33024
10:Q0 AMRequee d O utM me
Due on 3 Hourts) 0 - < s)
Mode Of Transpoe d by Famîly/FKendTranspoM tion To
Mode OfTranspo% tion Transported
.j.b FamilymiendFrom 7-'LL - ' '-- -- --
n is is a rm uest for r hurch A% ndancee Church is loœ te at 9.5 Mi and should Qke about 'Reason 16 Minutes by œ r. n ere are ONLY Y o Oc odox chue es in So* Norida,and both are
ln- ed about 16 minutes away from my home.
s Denied
Denial Reason eed to 5nd a place of worhship wilin 5 miles of your home.
cancel
/ A nrk/osr/vz/
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 53 of 70
.. ..- ..w w- auw - x xoaAlota:t FV e 1 01 1
+S.-
.*.'. DlsMAs C HARITIES
c. . lp; . #e- . . . . . ..t. z w @- Home Seamh Tasks Repo% Admin n
Traian BujduveanuAcnox Requ= AW ION REQUO D A1Ls
cAse No= SKP ' Adams. Lashonda
cu- INFo Crlent Buld' uveanu. Tm ian
Cu> STAY I- o Num- r 3
coxm crs Rm uo-oao 7qnaw z 12:z4 puc
u- Txsu. . . . - - - x - > > >
wDISRMAOGE e :s M pje . . - . '''DRM NG INFO I would Iike t
o ae nd chue W '- yevel Sunday m ming. at*eEeLoY- Reax n Rox nian oc Y ox chue 1- on ST .Rœ < 5 and Pemb= ke
E-puoo er w smu Pino . .
Flxeo Mova = Previous You are only allowed to > eI e in 5* ml*1es Y - Y lit erHo-e coNF. ResK n- re ious Y ees.
M am I --- 'a 7= 1o*r :œ >Move- REqun . .
Respo-OFFENSD
0- MQ''-'-
PAO M
PRooo-
Reoul- CHK KS- R- canœ l Ro.- gnSm w s HIsTor
Suesls- ce
SuM-
Y U/ J * C f *V Sga .8 .
h% #/a>n1>-m &&- hA#>-& e d= G c> GY Ac5oG - x > AcdoG - - - 11A.e ... 9* 01 l
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 54 of 70
Page 1 of 1D.l'= as (710 * - Fresbstart
.. I:M AS
= Home Seamh Wsks bY''''e - -
Traian BujdW eanu Mo- Er REQURST DETAIA= oM REQUOTS Staf M ams. LashondaCASE NOTES 'Glient Bu'duveanu, TOiaCtlEr INFO
STAY INFO Reqtlo ted DatB &W 010CuehTGoxTA= Requeste FX Date &8Q01Q
cuexm TAsxs Locations General SPR M U* WYXNan-
DlscllARoe .Holy cross 6232 Rllmore Hollywood FL 33024Dv so INFO w eetChuroh
EMpboo EN'r Requested Outmme 9:00 mEMPLOYMENT SCHEDULEFmEo MoveMEr a Due on 4 Hourtsl 0 Vnute l
HoMe couF. Mode of rted w gamgy/yre dTranspoMOVEM> T ReouelTs Transpoe tion To
oppsNsss Mode Of ami m rien .Mo- er s TOnSPO* 5On POmOpEN 7 a mk-ax kjt
Iike to ae nd ChurGh SeM M ' DO no : ' -----.I would -PAo em neason j s ,
-%5 >
PROGM MSCHECM SGYY DfzlodREQUIRED wo js we mgesCan yOu IW and 5ne 8 OUO
HISTORY oenial Reason 00 W M X 'STATUS .of the fadllty.SUBSISTENGESUMMARY CZNCd
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 55 of 70
Dismas Charities - Freshstart Page l of l
MOVEMENT REQIJEST TA q
Staff Adams, Lashonda
Client Bujduveanu, TraianRequested Date 10/6/2010
Requested For 10/10/2010Date
Locations GeneralName aaeetl atreetz Clty State Zip
Romanian Orthodox Church 6232 Fillmore Steet Hollywood FL 33024
Requested Out 10:00 AMTime
Duration 3 Hourts) 0 Minutets)
Mode Of yamijy/FriendTransported byTransportation To
Mode OfTransportationFrom
Reason
Status
Denial Reason
Tran ' Kend
This is a request for ''Church Aoendance'' Church is Iocate i and should take about16 Minutes . There are ONLY two Orthodox churches in South Florida.and both are
Iocated about 16 minutes away from my home.
enied
You need to find a place ofworhship within 5 miles of your home.
t cancel
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 56 of 70
r- t; A *'p* *
Dismas Chsrides - Freshstart
*N.-*. DlsM As HARITIES@*
?Q '-k9A 0* Home search Tasks Reports AdministrationLJ =
CUENT INFo Client Bujduveanu, Traiancuev sAwy lxFo Number
coxmAcms Requested 10/19Q010 6:47 PMcueN'r n sKs Date
DISCHAROE status completedDRMNG INFQ Please be kind and advise at your own conveniencevas per which rulesCMPLOYMENT this institution follows: The B.O.P. Rules or Dismas Charitiesvlnc. Rules.EMpLoo Ev Scueoul-e Reason lt appears to me that rules applied here are a maG r of convenienœ andFlxeo MoveMer s nOt of someting of Iegal nature. Please help me to undere nd this issue.
Best Regards Traian BujduveanuHOME GONF. P
revious transferredMova Er ReouesTs Responses gispert ana 1()?2A 010 4:26:0: PM
Dear Mr. Pœ ocelsky,Thank you for your email and message.T0 answer your question, YES I have sent a Subpoena to the US Marshal Selvices seeking the samedocuments.
I am trying to clear up to this Court some misleading statements made by the Defendants and their Atorrney.
Please see the attached Ietter (send via U.S. Mail today) regarding the subpoena you issued to the USM arshals Service. It appears that the M arshals' subpoena is seeking the same docum ents as the
subpoena to the FDC Miami. If that is not the case, please clarify.
Anthony Pogorzelski
Assistant United States Attorney
99 N.E. 4th Street
M iam i, FL 33132-2111
(305) 961-9296
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 59 of 70
om, . . .pp N J2 4 Jfree/ 'Miami. FL 33132305-961-9296
Jllne 28, 2012
U.S. Department of Justke
United States Attorney
Southern District ofFlorida
Via US M ail
Traian Bujduveanu5601 W Broward Blvd.Plantationa FL 33317
Re: Subpoena To United States Marshals Service in Bujduveanu v. DismasCharities, Inc. et aI., Case No. 11-2012(&CIV-SlM ONTON
Dear Mr. Bujduveanu:
We sgoke on the phone yesterday, June 27, 2012, regarding a subpoena issued by you toFDC Miami m the case of Bujduveanu v. Dismms Charities, Inc. et al. l sent a letter and emailregarding that subpoena yesterday as well. Today, l have received a subpoena issued by you inthe same cmqe addressed to the United Sutes M arshals Service. lt appears the M arshals'subpoena is seeking the same information as the FDC M inmi subpoenm Ifthat is the cmse, pleaseconlrm, in writing. If not, please clarify what separate documents you are seeking 9om the
M arshals. To the extent both subpoenas are seeking the same informationa only one responsewill be provided. Per our discussiow that response requires written compliance with theconkolling Touhy regulations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contacvme at the number listed above.
Very truly yours,
W IFREDO A. FERRER
UNITED STATES ORNEY
By: AAnthony Pogo elski
Assistant Ulli ed Stat s Attomey
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 60 of 70
fl1V* < ,- * l99 EE 4 StreetMiami, FL 33132305-961-9296
U.S. Departm ent of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District ofFlorida
June 27, 2012
Via US M ail
Traian Bujduveanu5601 W Broward Blvd.Plantation, FL 33317
Re: Subpoena To FDC M iami in Bujduveanu v. Di.smas Charities, Inc. et al., CaseNo. 11-20120-CW -SIM ONTON
Dear Mr. Bujduveanu:
This letter serves to reiterate the telephone call we had on June 27, 2012, regarding the
subpoena issued by you upon FDC Miami in the case of Bujduveanu v. Dismu Charities, lnc. etal. As explained during the telephone call
, the subpoena is defcient on several grotmds. FDCM iami cnnnot, and will not, comply with the subpoena unless the following issues are resolved
.
In order to produce a response to your subpoena request, you must first comply with
conkolling Toulw regulations plzrsllnnt to United States ex rel. Toulw v. Raaen. 340 U.S. 462(1951) and its progeny. 28 C.F.R. j 16.22(d) provides that çtlwlhen infbrmation other t11a11 oraltestimony is sought by a demand, the responsible U.S. Attomey shall request a summary of theinformatlon sought and its relevance to the proceedingv'' By properly complying w1111 thisrequirement, several deficiencies of the subpoena may be corrected. Please provide a writtensnmmary of the information sought by the demand, a clear explanation of the documents sought
,
and what the doclzments' relevance is to the underlying proceedings.
In additiono your request will most likely implicate Privacy Act concernq. To the extent
you seek only your own records (i.e., not records that identify any third parties), you mayprovide a Privacy Act waiver for yourself. To the extent you seek records that are identifable by
a tllird party, you must obtain a waiver 9om said tbird party (or parties) or a Privacy Act Order9om the Court.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 61 of 70
Upon proper compliance w1t11 the above requirements, FDC M inmi will process your
subpoena request. To the extent FDC Minmi can produce documents (i.e., al1 requirement havebeen met, production is approved, and documents exist), FDC Minmi will produce documentswitbin a reàsonable time from the receipt of a1l requirements identiGed above. If you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the nllmber listed above.
Very truly yours,
W VREDO A. FERRER
IN TED STATES A Y
Ry: ' YN. R
Anthony Pogo lsklAssistant United States omey
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 62 of 70
To: Anthony Pogorzelski / US Atorney99 NE 4th StreetMiami, Florida 33152
ReI: (305) 961-9296
Dear Mr. Pogorzelski,
Thank you kindly for taking the time to call me today.
As per our telephone conversation, I would Iike to advise you that what I am looking for isa copy of the SENTRY REPORT entered into the SENTRY SYSTEM, in my name
rfromOdober 01, 2010 to Present time,These documents are necessal for my civil case against Dismas Charities
,lnc., Iocated inDania, Florida. (Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charitieszlnc. et AII, case No. 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ / SIMONTON)In an a/empt to mislead this Court, Defendants are using a series of misleading
statements in order to switch the blame on the BOP and other US Government agencies,when that is not true.In fad if you get a chance to speak to Counselor Price, FDC Miami, 7 East
, she will tell youthe truth,
AII that I am trying to do at this moment is to bring the truth to the surface and stop someof the corruption that has been going on for awhile.
As requested by you, I will be sending you shooly a Ietler requesting a copy of the
SENTRY REPORT from Odober 01/2010 to Present time.Also please note the fad that by requesting those information I am waving my information
privacy rights.
Best Regards
Traian Bujduveanu5601 W . Broward Blvd.Plantation, FL 33317
TeI: (954) 316-3828
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 64 of 70
Date:llme 27, 2012
To: Anthony Pogorzelsld /Assim nt United States Attorney
U.S. Depnement of JusdceUnited Smtes AtorneySouthern District of Florida
99 N. E. 4 StreetMiami, FL 33132
Dear Mr. Pogoa elsky.
Further to our previous telephone conversadon, please be advised thatthe only documents that l am requeeing from FDC Miamt are the Senr System
Repo> bearing my name, entered into the Sen> System by FDC Miami fromOctober 01. 2010 to January 03, 2011when I was release from the FederalDetention Center in Miami.
The informadon sought are necessary in the Civil Case No. 11-20120-ClWSIMMONTON to reveal to the Southern District of Florida some of the misleading
statements made bythe Defendanu, thus bringing the m Z:II to the surface and
eliminadng some of the co= pdon atthose insdm tions.
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 65 of 70
AUTHORIZATION FORTHE RELEASE OF INFORM TION
UNDER PRIVAW AW
BUJDW EANUTRAMPlace of bfrth: Sinoeylud. Constanm. RomaniaDate of Birth: 12/11/1954
I Hereby authorize the the US Attorney OE ce and FDC Minmi to releaseinformaton regarding me to the following individuals:
Traian BujduveanuReladonship: self5601 W . Broward Blvd.Plantadon. FL 33317
Tel: (954) 316-2828
> zz /+2 v<' z#z planla/b. , Az
Nz/kr pψp/rm /k 3u< e zz. xp/z
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 66 of 70
Exhibit 7
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 67 of 70
* U.S. Depar*-ont of JustieeFederal Bureau of Prisons
P rogram
Statenzent
OPI: CPD/CSBwnunRp: p5270.08
DATE: 12/4/2009SUBJECT: Inmate Discipline and
Special Housing Units
This Program Statement transmits policies and procedures
prescribed for Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units. ThisProgram Statement becomes effective January 4, 1988. Thiseffective date means that the new rules and procedures will apply
to the processing of all acts of misconduct committed at and
after 12:01 aam . on January 4, 1988.
NsNJ. MICHAEL QUINLANDirector
IBracket.d Boid - RuleslRegular Type - Implementing Information
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 68 of 70
P5270.08
12/4/2009Chapter 2, Page 2
(SDMMAQY OF DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM
Table 1
frable retyped 12/4/09 due to technical problems w11 5le)
PROCEDURES DISPOSITIONS
1. Incident involving possible
commission of prohibited act.Except for prohibited acts in the m atest orlligh severity categories, the writer of the
report may resolve info= slly or drop thecharges.
Except for prohibited acts in tbe m atest orhigh severity categories, the Lieutenant may
resolve informslly, or drop the charges.
2. Stafprepa'es lncident Reportand folwards it to Lieutenant.
3. Appoinu ent of inveségator whoconduc? invesugation and forwardsmateiial to Unit Discipline Committee
4. Initial hexring before Urlit DisciplineCommittee.
Unit Discipline Committee may drop or resolveinformnlly any M odemte or lxw Moderate charge,
impose allowable sancdons, or refer to the
Discipline Hee ng Om cer.
n e DiscipM e Hp-qn'ng Om cer may imposeallowable sancéons or drop the charges.
n e appropriate reviewing oœcial (the Warden,Re/onal Diredor, or GOH Cotmsel) mayapprove, modify, reverse, or send back w1Q1directions, inclue g orden'ng a rehenring, butma'y not increm e the sanctions imposed in any
valid disciplinary acéon taken
5. Hesring befox Discipline Hemring
0151- .
6. Appeals tbrough Adminis% éveRemedy ProcH ure
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 69 of 70
CERTHQCATE OF SERNICE
1 hereby certify that on or about JUNE 30, 2012 a true and correct copy of theforegoing document was served upon the following via the United States Postal
Serdce, First Clmss M ail:
Dism as Charities, lnc.141 N W 1St Avenue
Datliw FL 33304
Ana GispertDismas Charities, Inc.141 N W 1't Avenue
Daniw FL 33004
Derek Thomms
Dismms Charities, Inc.141 N W 1St Avenue
Daniw FL 33004
Adams Lashanda
Dismas Charities, Inc.141 N W 1St Avenue
Daniw FL 33004
David S. Chaiet , Esqe e
Attorney for Defendnnts
4000 Hollm ood Boulevard
Suite 265-South
Hollywood, FL 33021
EM CUTED ON TIIIS 30 DAY OF JUNE, 2012
fM ?
'IR AI> B U .TD ,Ax lJ P R O s E
5601 W . BROW ARD BLVD.,
PLANTATION, FL 33317
Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2012 Page 70 of 70