-
-1-FIR No. 250/1995PS- R.K. PuramState v. R.K. Puram
05-02-2015
PW 22: Ms. Deepa Verma W/o Shri Deepak Raj Soni, Deputy
Director, FSL, Rohini, Delhi
On S.A.
On 24-10-1996 I was posted as Sr. Scientific Officer
(Documents) at FSL, Malviya Nagar. I am M.Sc in chemistry
from
Meerut university, Meerut. I have more than 24 years of
experience in the field of documents examination. I had
reported
lacs of exhibits and deposed in approx. 800 courts.
On 24-10-1996 the present case was marked to me for
examination of documents. The documents which were examined
in this case were signatures and writings on cheques, share
transfer forms etc. which were the questioned documents
marked
as Q1 to Q14 with sub-markings. The standard/specimen
writings
and signatures of one Ramesh Gupta were also received for
comparison which were marked as S1 to S-44, S-19/1 and
S-19/2.
After thorough forensic examination, I furnished my
report FSL-95/D-308 dated 24-10-1996 and the same is
Ex.PW22/1 bearing my signature at point A. In the said report,
I
opined that similarities in writing habits of the writings
marked Q1
to Q14 and Q14/1 with the standard writings marked S-1 to
S-19,
S-19/1, S-19/2 and S-22, S-44, which led me to the opinion
of
common authorship. The details of examination and analysis
is
mentioned in my above said report. However, on rest of the
items
-2-
-
it was not possible to express definite opinion.
XXXXX by accused accused Ramesh Gupta.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXX By Dayanand Arya, Counsel for accused Vinod Malik.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXX By Tej Narain, Legal Aid Counsel for accused Vinod
Kumar
Aggarwal and Sandeep Kumar.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXXX By Shri Rajeev Jain, counsel for accused Ajay Kalia,
Upender Sehrawat and Kanwar Sain.
Nil ; opportunity given.
RO & AC
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015
-
-1-FIR No. 281/2006PS- Crime BranchState v. Anil Kumar
Dhawan
05-02-2015
PW 19 : Shri Arun Kumar S/o Shri Sube Singh, aged about 30 years
R/o Village Jouri Khurd, District Gurgaon, Haryana.
On S.A.
In the year 2005 I was unemployed. My foofaji, Vijay
Kumar, came to our house at above mentioned address and told
that both of his sons, namely, Ranvir and Ravi, were getting
employment in Aakashwani Bhawan. He told that accused,
present in the court today (correctly identified by the
witness),
was providing the said job. My parents also asked for my
employment and told my Foofaji to talk to accused in this
regard.
I went to Anil Kumar Bhawan and he demanded Rs.1.5 Lac for
employment for the post of LDC. I returned back to my house
and
informed my parents about the same. My parents took loan of
Rs.
One lac. I went to accused, who called me in Aakashwani
Bhawan.
I along with accused went inside Aakashwani Bhawan and I
handed over Rs. One Lac to him and accused filled one form
and
got my signatures on it. He told me that he would intimate
about
the job after some days. After few days, he showed me one
I-card
and appointment letter pertaining to myself and told that soon
I
will get the job. I was also got medically examined at
Charak
Palika Hospital. However, after many days he was
-2-
-
ignoring on one pretext or the other. Lastly, I along with
other
victims, namely, Inderjeet, Ranvir, Ravi, Krishan, Subhash
and
Sunil, took I-cards and appointment letters from the accused
and
lodged the complaint against him in Crime Branch Office,
R.K.
Puram. We had given the I-cards and appointment letters to
the
police.
(At this stage, five documents are shown to the witness and
witness stated that the same were given by accused and he
had
signed on those documents. The documents are collectively
Ex.PW19/1 bearing the signature of witness at point A on
each
page.)
(At this stage, one original I-card is shown to the witness
and
witness stated that the same was given by accused. The I-card
is
Ex.PW19/2 bearing the signature of witness at point A.)
(At this stage, one appointment letter is shown to the witness
and
witness stated that the same was given by accused. The
original
appointment letter is Ex.PW19/3.)
(At this stage, Ld. APP seeks permission to cross examine
the
witness as he is not disclosing the complete facts of the
case.
Heard. Allowed.
XXXXXX By Shri Anil Kumar Paswan, Ld. APP for the State
It is correct that my foofa ji told that accused was
working in Aakashwani Bhawan as Assistant. I had handed over
the appointment letter, which was photostate copy as well as
-3-
original, to the IO.
-
XXXXXX By Shri D.K. Sharma, counsel for accused
I have studied up to 12th standard. Accused had shown
the advertisement about the said vacancy in the newspaper. I
had
not stated about this fact to the police. VOL: It was not
asked
from me. I did not handed over the copy of said
advertisement
to police. My foofa ji is residing at Bagdola, Delhi. I know
accused
through my foofaji only. I did not knew accused prior to that.
It is
wrong to suggest that accused had not demanded the amount of
Rs. 1.5 Lac from me. I had not stated to police that I was
medically examined at Charak Palika Hospital. VOL: As it was
not
asked from me. It is correct that Ex.PW19/1 is not
completely
filled. It is correct that their is no seal or name of any
official on
Ex.PW19/1. I had not taken any receipt regarding payment of
Rs.
One Lac to accused. Only I myself had went to Aakashwani
Bhawan for payment of Rs. One Lac to accused. I was called
by
accused through mobile phone. I has not stated to the police
about the fact of calling me through phone. No
acknowledgment
was given regarding delivery of I-card and appointment letter.
It is
wrong to suggest that accused had not given any I-card and
appointment letter to me. It is correct that I have received
Rs.
75,000/- out of said amount of Rs. One Lac from my foofaji
(complainant). I had not given any written complaint to the
crime
branch. It is wrong to suggest that I never met accused or that
I
gave Rs. One Lac to my foofa ji for my job or that I had not
made
the payment to accused. It is correct that the photograph put
on
-4-
Ex.PW19/3 bears my signature at point A. It is wrong to
suggest
that the photographs were not taken by the accused but by my
-
foofa ji. I had not handed over documents of my educational
qualification to police. It is wrong to suggest that I am
deposing
falsely just for obtaining Rs.25,000/- from my foofaji.
RO & AC
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015
-
CC No. 4211/2014PS- Sangam ViharSuman v. Seema Devi
05-02-2015Present : Ms. Suman, complainant in person with
counsel Shri
Arpit Sharma.Accused Seema Devi on bail with counsel Shri L.A
Vashist.
Matter put up before this court pursuant to order
dated 23-01-2015 passed by the appellate court of Ld.
ASJ-03,
South, Saket Courts, Delhi, for proceedings further with the
trial of
this case or to assign it to any other court of competent
jurisdiction.
Put up for consideration on 11-02-2015 at 2 PM.
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015
-
FIR No. 281/2006PS- R.K. PuramState v. Anil Kumar Dhawan
05-02-2015Present : Shri Anil Kumar Paswan, Ld. APP for the
State.
Accused on bail with counsel Shri D.K. Sharma.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused.
PW19 Shri Arun Kumar examined and discharged.
PW Shri Sushil Kumar failed to turn up despite service
of summons. Issue BW in the sum of Rs.5000/- with one surety
in
the like amount against him for the next date of hearing.
Put up for PE on 28-04-2015.
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015
-
FIRNo.200/99PSKotlaMubarakpur
05.02.2015
Statevs.AshokParshadStatementofaccusedAshokParshadsonoflateSh.JanviPrasadage:59years,R/o.H.No.1,AwasVikasColony,Gorakhpur,Delhi,u/s.313Cr.P.CWithoutOath.
Q1.
IthascomeinevidencethatDr.MammenChandy(PW7)hadwrittenaletterdated05.01.1999MarkAtoSecretary,MedicalCouncilofIndia,mentioningthatlettersdated03.06.98(MarkC/Ex.PW12/C)andletterdated
05.06.1998 (Mark D/Ex.PW12/D) addressed to Honble
Secretary,RACP,werenotwrittenbyhim.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Icametoknowaboutitonlyaftertheregistrationofthiscase.Q2.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatPW1Dr.K.K.ArorastatedthathereceivedaforesaidletterfromPW7andoninquiryitwasfoundthataforesaidlettersdated03.06.98and5.6.98,purportedlyissuedbySecretary,MCI,Sh.MammenChandy,ontheletterheadofMCI,wereforgedsinceMCIhadneveroperatedfromtheaddressH73A,NDSEI,NewDelhi110024,givenonsaidletterheadsandtelephonenumbersmentionedthereonwerealsonotusedbyMCIatanypointoftime.Further,hementionedthathegaveacomplaintEx.PW1/1topolicealongwithphotocopyofdifferentdocumentsMarkAtoMarkE,onthebasisofwhichFIRwasregistered.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Icametoknowaboutitaftertheregistrationofthiscase.Q3.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatonthebasisofrukkasentbySIOmbirSingh,FIREx.PW3/AinthiscasewasregisteredbyPW3ASIPratapSinghandfurtherhemadeendorsement
on the rukkaEx.PW3/B.Whatyouhavetosay?A. Iamnotawareaboutthis.Q4.
It is further come in evidence that PW4 Sh. Mehtab
AlamdisclosedthatgroundfloorofH73A,SouthExtn.PartI,NewDelhiwasgivenonrenttoafirmfrom1993to1997andafterthatitremainedinhispossession.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Ihadneverresidedintheaforesaidproperty.However,onefirmnamelyTrikayaInternationalwasoperatingfromthesaidpropertyat
the
-
relevanttimeandmybrotherwasoneofitspartnertill1997.Q5.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatPW5Sh.GolakNarainSewakPandeytestifiedthatheinformedpoliceofficialofCrimeBranchthatyouwereresidinginH.No.1,AwasVikasColony,Gorakhpur.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Itistrue.Q6. It is further come in evidence that in response to
letterEx.PW12/EofIOPW12InspectorPratapSingh,replyreceivedfromIndianCouncilofMedicalResearchEx.PW8/AtotheeffectthatyouwereneitheranadvisorinICMRnorremainedassociatedwithitinanyposition.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
ItiscorrectthatIhadneverremainedassociatedwithICMR.Q.7. It is
further come in evidence that in response to letterEx.PW12/F of IO
PW12 Inspector Pratap Singh, reply received
fromDirectorIndianNational
ScienceAcademyEx.PW2/AgivenbyPW2Sh.S.P.Sharmatotheeffect
thatyouwerenotafellowoftheacademyandShreeDhanwantariwasneverawardedtoyouin1995.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Itiscorrect.Q.8.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatinresponsetoletterwrittenbyIOPW12Inspector
PratapSingh, a
replywasreceivedfromMinistryofDefenceEx.PW6/AgivenbyPW6Sh.G.B.SinghtotheeffectthatyouwereneverawardedPadamshreein1984andPadambhushanin1991.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Itiscorrect.Q.9. It is further come in evidence that on the request
of
IOsentthroughletterMarkPW12/P,PW10Sh.N.C.Jha,beingpostedasAssistantDirectorInterpolDelhi,sentthecopyofreportreceivedfromtheconcernedagencyregardingyoualongwithhis
letterEx.PW10/A.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Iamnotawareaboutthesaidreport.Q.10. It is further come in evidence
that in response to letterEx.PW12/E written by IO PW12 Inspector
Pratap Singh, a reply
wasreceivedfromDirectorofNutritionFoundationofIndiaEx.PW11/Atothe
-
effect that you were never the member of Advisory board of
NutritionFoundationofIndia.Whatyouhavetosay?A. Itiscorrect.Q.11.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatyouwerearrestedfromPatnavidearrestmemoEx.PW9/AandpersonalsearchmemoEx.PW9/B.Further,yourdisclosurestatementEx.PW9/Cwasalsorecorded.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Itiscorrect.Q.12. It is
furthercomeinevidencethatIOPW12InspectorPratapSingh took your
specimen handwriting in seven sheets Ex.PW12/A
on19.02.2001andontensheetsEx.PW12/Son17.09.2002andagainontensheets
Ex.PW12/T on 18.09.2002. Further, in response to letters of
IO,RACPsenttwooriginallettersEx.PW12/CandEx.PW12/Dalongwiththeirreply
Ex.PW12/B. Further, in response to email sent by IO to
GeneralMedical Council, Glasgow, email Ex.PW12/G was received
alongwithattachedfileEx.PW12/H.Further,
inresponsetoemailofIOEx.PW12/I,emailwasreceivedfromRCPSEx.PW12/J.Further,IOreceivedtwolettersdated22.11.97and30.07.98Ex.PW12/K,purportedlywrittenbyProf.K.K.Kapoor,bypostandcopyofFaxdated03.05.1999and10.09.2000sentbyyou
and Sh. Ashola respectively are mark 12/L and 12/M
respectively.Further, the original letter dated 20.04.2001
purportedly written by
ShAsholaPrasadEx.PW12/Mandcopyofletterdt.18.06.2001writtenbyhimismark12/O.Further,inresponsetoemailofIO,hereceivedemailfromRCPSGlasgowEx.PW12/R.Whatyouhavetosay?A.
Myspecimenhandwriting was obtained by IOonly once
atGorakhpurwhenIwasaskedtoreproducetheallegedforgedlettergivenbyDr.MammenChandyandsubsequentlymyspecimensignaturesweretakenonseveralsheets.IamnotawareaboutthecorrespondencedonebyIO.Q.13.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethathandwritingexpertPW13Sh.AmiLalDakshgavehisreportEx.PW13/Atotheeffectthatyouhadwrittenquestioneddocumentsi.e.alettersdated03.06.1998,05.06.1998,22.12.1997,31.07.1998,03.05.1999,10.09.2000and20.04.2001,purportedlywrittenbySecretary,MCI,Prof.K.K.Kapoor,AsholiaPrasadandAshulaPrasad.Whatyouhavetosay?
-
A. The handwriting expert has given wrong opinion. The
firstreportwasgiveninnegativeandthe2ndreportcamethreeyearsafterfilingofthiscaseintheCourt.Q.14.
Whytheprosecutionwitnesseshavedeposedagainstyou?A.
Noonehasdeposedagainstme.Q.15. Doyouwantsayanythingelse?A.
Ihadworkedfor32yearsabroadpracticingpsychiatricandaftercomingbacktoIndia,IestablishedaCharitableclinicinGorakhpurin1999.One
police official namely Ombir Singh telephoned my house
andthreatenedmymothertosendmetoDelhioffice.ThenIcalledbackatEOWofficeandtalktoACPTyagi.ThenIsentacomplainttoCommissionerofpoliceagainstACPTyagiandOmbirSinghfortheirmisconduct.
Amonthafter,InspectorPratapSinghcametomyplaceatGorakhpurandcollectedmyhandwritingsampleoneightsheets,copyofmypassport,mycertificatesandmedicalregistration.NoneofthesedocumentsmentionedmynameasA.S.J.Prasad,hascomeintheforgedletters.MydateofbirthshownintheCVbroughtbyIOwasalsowrong.IhadalsoinformedthatsincebeginningIhavepracticedasapsychiatricinsevencountrieswhereasthequalificationshowninthedocumentsbroughtbyIOwasrelatedtohaematology.IalsoinformedthatIhadneverstayedatanyplaceinNOIDA.Ihavebeenfalselyimplicatedinthiscase.Q.16.
Doyouwanttoleaddefenceevidence?A. No. RO&AC
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
Certifiedthattheabovestatementofaccusedhasbeenrecordedby
undersigned personally and it contains the true and full account
ofexplanationgivenbyhim.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.380/01P.S.HauzKhasStatevs.MadanjeetSingh&Ors.
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedSwamiVikramanandonbailwithcounselSh.RajivDayal.AccusedSurenderKumarAroraandR.P.Prasadonbail.ProceedingsagainstaccusedMadanjeetSinghabatedvide
orderdated1972013.AccusedJyoti Prasadconvictedandsentencedvideorder
dated21092004.AccusedY.L.Sachdeva,AtmaRamGupta,JaiveerNagar
andR.R.Sakiadischargedvideorderdated02092014.
File is in Sessions Court where next date of hearing
is10.02.2015. In view of this, put up for further proceedings
on21.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.213/06P.S.LodhiColony(EOW)
05.02.2015 Statevs.SriNiwasSharma&Ors.Present:
Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedS.N.SharmaonbailwithcounselSh.UdaiRaj.AccusedRakeshJainisabsent.ProxycounselforaccusedRakeshJain.SonofcomplainantinpersonwithcounselSh.NiteshRana.
Application for exemption frompersonal appearance has
beenmovedonbehalfofaccusedRakeshJain.Heard.Inviewofreasonsstatedintheapplication,sameisallowed.
ItissubmittedbycomplainantaswellasaccusedS.N.Sharmathatall
theformalitiesforexecutingnecessarydocumentstotransferthetitleofpropertymeasuring2772.305sq.ydscomprisinginkhasrano.565,VillageBisnoli,TehsilDadri,U.P,infavourofcomplainantSh.A.K.Govilhave
been completed and date may be fixed for registration of
titledocumentsintheofficeofconcernedregistrar.Onbeingasked,itisstatedthat11.02.2015issuitedtoboththesides.Accordingly,complainantaswellas
accused S.N. Sharma are directed to appear in person before
theconcernedregistrarforregistrationoftitledocumentsofaforesaidpropertyinfavourofcomplainant.ThesaleconsiderationwouldbedeemedtohavebeenpaidbycomplainantinviewofSupremeCourtdirectionsasfixeddepositreceiptinthesumofRs.1,02,57,510/hasalreadybeenplacedonrecordon16.12.2014andthisfactbeincorporatedinthetitledocumentsaccordingly.
Copy of registered title documents be placed on record
onNDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson09.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
DeokinandanChaturvedivs.RajShreeGroup
05.02.2015Present: DH/oneofthevictiminperson.
JD/accusedSriNiwasSharmainpersonwithcounselSh. UdaiRaj.
ItissubmittedonbehalfofpartiesthatmatterislikelytobesettledandsettlementamountwouldbepaidinMarch,2015.
Inviewofthis,putupwithStatecaseon09.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
CCNo.235/1/12P.S.HauzKhasSantoshKumarBaglavs.M/sMausmiBhattacharjee
05.02.2015Present: None.
Statusreport filedonbehalf of IOSINitinKumarto
theeffectthathehasbeenhandedovertheinvestigationtwodaysbackandFSLreportisawaited.
Earlier report hascomethat inconnectedmatter FIRNo.128/05 P.S.
Defence Colony, cancellation report is
pendingconsiderationintheCourtofLd.CMM,SouthEast,NewDelhiandinvestigationincaseFIRNo.21/05ispendingawaitingtheFSLresult.
Inviewofthis,putupforfurtherproceedingson01.05.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.168/11P.S.CrimeBranchStatevs.VimalKumar
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Accusedisabsent.Complainantinperson.
It
isobservedthataccusedwasabsentonthelastdate.Inviewofthis,bailbondofaccusedstandsforfeited.IssueNBWagainstaccusedwithnoticetohissuretyforNDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson15.04.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.207/06P.S.MalviyaNagar(EOW)Statevs.Sanjay&Anr.
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Boththeaccusedonbail.
ThebounddownwitnessPWSh.AnilKumarfailedtoturnup.IssueB/WagainsthiminthesumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.Further,heisdirectedtoproduceoriginalGPA.
DespiteexecutionofB/W,Ct.Dharampalfailedtoturnup.Consideringthat
all thepoliceofficials arebusyin urgentduty
inconnectionwithcomingassemblyelections,nofurtheradverseorderispassedagainsthim.IssuefreshB/WagainstCt.DharampalinthesumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.
PWSISureshKumarispresent.HeadmittedhismistakeforhisnonappearanceonthelastdatedespiteexecutionofB/W.Intheinterestofjustice,NBWorderedtobeissuedagainsthimiscancelled.ItissubmittedbyLd.APPfortheStatethatsinceSISureshKumarisIO,hebedischargedandhistestimonywouldberecordedafterthetestimonyofotherwitnesses.
PutupforPEon24.04.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.108/11P.S.R.K.Puram(AATS)Statevs.Vikram@Ravi&Ors.
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedVikram@Raviisabsent.AccusedBishanSinghonbailwithcounselSh.S.K.Soni.AccusedNiwas@Sunilacquittedvideorderdt.25.11.2013.
ItisobservedthataccusedVikram@Raviwasabsentonthelastdate.Inviewofthis,hisbailbondisforfeited.IssueNBWagainsthimwithnoticetohissuretyforNDOH.
Earlier,ithadbeenreportedthataccusedVikram@RaviisinJCinthreecasesinRohiniCourt.
Inviewofthis, P/WbealsoissuedagainstaccusedVikram@RaviforNDOH.
Summons sent to PW Ct. Amit Kumar and HC ArvindKumar have been
served but they have sent request in writing toexempt their
personal appearance on account of urgent duty
inconnectionwithcomingassemblyelections.Inviewofthis,theybesummonedafreshforNDOH.
PutupforPEon27.04.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.372/1998P.S.VasantKunj(CB)Statevs.K.N.Ramchandran&Anr.
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedVinayTyagionbail.AccusedK.N.Ramachandranisabsent.
DespiteexecutionofB/W,IOSIJ.P.Singhfailedtoturnup.Consideringthat
all thepoliceofficials arebusyin urgentduty
inconnectionwithcomingassemblyelections,nofurtheradverseorderispassedagainsthim.IssuefreshB/WagainstIOSIJ.P.SinghinthesumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamountforNDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson11.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015Lateron:
Sh.DeepakTyagi,counselforboththeaccusedappearedandrequestedforchangeofdate.Asprayedfor,dateischangedto16.03.2015.Thedategivenas11.03.2015iscancelled.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
CCNo.22/1/SCentralBankofIndiavs.AnupSinghTanwar&Ors.
05.02.2015Statement of Sh. Rajpal Singh, Advocate, D/1789/07,
Chamber no.579,PatialaHouseCourts,NewDelhi.W.O.
Iamcounselforpetitionerandhavebeendulyauthorizedtomake statement
on its behalf. As per instructions from
thepetitioner/CentralBankofIndia,Imaykindlybeallowedtowithdrawthepresentpetitionwithlibertytofilethefreshpetitioninaccordancewithlaw.
RO&AC(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.359/13P.S.HauzKhasStatevs.RanveerSinghRana
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedonpolicebailwithcounselSh.ShailenderSharma.
Freshvakalatnamafiledforaccused.Copyofchargesheetsuppliedtoaccused.Anapplicationforbailu/s437Cr.P.Cmoved.Heard.Since
the offence is bailable in nature, accused Ranveer Singh Rana
isadmittedtobailonhisfurnishingapersonalbondinthesumofRs.50,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.BailbondfurnishedandacceptedtillNDOH.
Putupforscrutinyofdocumentson16.04.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.279/03P.S.LodhiColony(CB)Statevs.PradeepKumar
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedinpersonwithcounselSh.SudhirKumar.Suretyinperson.
AnapplicationforcancellationofNBWmovedbyaccused.Heard. In view
of the reasons given in the application, same isallowed.
In view of previous order, issue B/W in the sum of
Rs.5,000/eachagainstPWPoojaShashiandBalbirwithonesuretyinthelikeamount.
PutupforPEon13.05.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.180/08P.S.EOWStatevs.AvdheshMittal
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedAvdheshMittalonbailwithcounselSh.S.S.Wani.AccusedNarenderKumarChauhanonbailwithcounselSh.VikasArora.Complainantinpersonwithproxycounsel.
NoticesenttoIOforclarificationbuthehassentrequestinwritingtoexempthispersonalappearanceonaccountofurgentdutyinconnectionwithcomingassemblyelections.Inviewofthis,freshnoticebeissuedtoIOforNDOH.
On joint request, matter is adjourned for arguments
onapplicationu/s173(8)Cr.P.Candforsummoningofotherpersonsasaccusedfor23.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
M.No.46/1/MAvdheshvs.RajenderChhabra
05.02.2015Present: Applicant/accusedinpersonwithcounsel.
Respondentinperson.
PutupwithStatecaseon23.03.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
-
FIRNo.200/99P.S.K.M.PurStatevs.AshokParshad
05.02.2015Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Accusedonbail.
StatementofaccusedU/s313Cr.P.Crecorded.Hehasoptednottoleaddefenceevidence.
Putupforfinalargumentson20.02.2015.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015