8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
1/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 1 of 30 PageID 112
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
2/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 2 of 30 PageID 113
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
3/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 3 of 30 PageID 114
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
4/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 4 of 30 PageID 115
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
5/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 5 of 30 PageID 116
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
6/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 6 of 30 PageID 117
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
7/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 7 of 30 PageID 118
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
8/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 8 of 30 PageID 119
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
9/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 9 of 30 PageID 120
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
10/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 10 of 30 PageID 121
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
11/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 11 of 30 PageID 122
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
12/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 12 of 30 PageID 123
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
13/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 13 of 30 PageID 124
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
14/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 14 of 30 PageID 125
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
15/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 15 of 30 PageID 126
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
16/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 16 of 30 PageID 127
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
17/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 17 of 30 PageID 128
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
18/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 18 of 30 PageID 129
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
19/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 19 of 30 PageID 130
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
20/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 20 of 30 PageID 131
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
21/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 21 of 30 PageID 132
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
22/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 22 of 30 PageID 133
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
23/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 23 of 30 PageID 134
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
24/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 24 of 30 PageID 135
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
25/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 25 of 30 PageID 136
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
26/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 26 of 30 PageID 137
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
27/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 27 of 30 PageID 138
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
28/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 28 of 30 PageID 139
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
29/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 29 of 30 PageID 140
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
30/31
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19 Filed 06/09/11 Page 30 of 30 PageID 141
8/6/2019 DMA Motion to Dismiss
31/31
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
ARNOLD LEON SCHROEDER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No: 3:11-CV-00525-B
KERN WILDENTHAL, EDWARD A.
COPLEY, HARRY S. PARKER, III,
GEORGE CHARLTON, IRVIN LEVY,
and THE DALLAS MUSEUM OF ART,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DMA DEFENDANTS
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
Before the Court is Defendants Dallas Museum of Art, Harry S. Parker, III, George
Charlton, and Irvin Levys (collectively, DMA Defendants) Motion to Dismiss Amended
Complaint and Brief in Support (Doc. No. __), filed June 9, 2011. Having considered the
Motion, Plaintiffs Response, DMA Defendants Reply, and the applicable law, the Court is of
the opinion that DMA Defendants Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint should be and
hereby is GRANTED.
Therefore it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Arnold Leon Schroeder, Jr. take nothing
by his lawsuit against DMA Defendants, and that Plaintiffs claims against the DMA Defendants
are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
DATED June ___, 2011
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:11-cv-00525-B Document 19-1 Filed 06/09/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID 142