DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK SECTION 31 23 00 · PDF fileDIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK SECTION 31 23 00 ... H. ASTM D 3017 Test Method for Moisture Content ... J. ASTM D-1557 Standard Test Methods

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

SECTION 31 23 00EXCAVATION AND FILL

PART 1 - GENERAL

1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

A. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and other

Division I Specification Sections, apply to this Section.

1.2 SUMMARY

A. The work under this Section includes the following:

1. Excavation for site improvements

2. Filling, backfilling, and compaction

1.3 RELATED WORK

A. The following similar work is specified under other Sections:

1. Section 01 45 23, Testing and Inspection Services

2. Section 03 30 00 Concrete Work: Sidewalk Replacement

1.4 STANDARDS

A. All work to be performed under this Section shall comply with the provisions of Sections 202, 203, 204, 207

and 208 of the "NJDOT Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction," as amended herein.

1.5 SUBMITTALS

A. If excess excavated material is to be used for structural fill, provide Certificate from testing agency, approved

by Contracting Officer, that the fill material meets the Specifications.

B. Certification for each type of fill material, certifying that the material is clean in accordance with New Jersey

Administrative Code (NJAC 7:26E-6).

C. Provide an underground utility survey of all utilities in the area of excavation work, including, but not limited

to, underground water, sewer, telecom/data lines, and electrical duct banks including owner owned

distributions.

1.6 REFERENCES

A. ASTM C 136 Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Course Aggregates

B. ASTM C 136 Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils

C. ASTM D 698 Test Methods for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures

Using 5.5 Pound Rammer and 12 inch Drop

D. ASTM D 1556 Test Method for Density of Soil in Place by the Sand-Cone Method

E. ASTM D 2167 Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil In-Place by the Rubber Balloon

Method

F. ASTM D 2487 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)

G. ASTM D 2922 Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods

(Shallow Depth)

H. ASTM D 3017 Test Method for Moisture Content of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by Nuclear

Methods (Shallow Depth)

I. ASTM D 4318 Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils

WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRS PAGE 31-1 OCTOBER 21, 2011

TAXATION BUILDING

TRENTON, MERCER COUNTY, NJ

PROJECT No. A 1117-00


J. ASTM D-1557 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil UsingModified Effort (56,000 ft-lbl/ft3(2,700 kN-m/m3))

1.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING

A. Backfilling/compaction operations shall be controlled by testing. Compaction shall be determined byASTM D-698. The Contractor shall engage and pay for an approved testing agency to control testingoperations. Refer to requirements of Section 01 45 23, Testing and Inspection Services.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.1 MATERIALS

A. Fill Material: Well graded sand and gravel free of deleterious material and organic matter and containing nomore than 12% fines (minus No. 200 sieve size).

B. General Fill Material: Excavated on-site material meeting the requirements for Imported Fill Materials may beused within concrete walkways, below the 6" stone fill, subject to testing and with prior approval of theArchitect.

C. Imported Fill Materials: Off-site material meeting the requirements of sandy soils (SW, SP or SM inaccordance with ASTM D 2487), free of deleterious material and organic matter meeting the followinggradation:

Sieve Size Percent By Weight PassingSquare Mesh Sieve

2" 100%Y4 70% -100%#4 30% - 80%#50 10% -35%#200 5% -12%

Samples and analysis of all imported materials to be submitted in accordance with Section 1.5 Submittals.

D. Stone Fill: New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) Standard Coarse Aggregate Size No. 57 for useas pipe bedding and under structures and grade slabs. The particle size distribution or gradation curve shall bewithin the ranges shown below.

Sieve Size Percent By Weight PassingSquare Mesh Sieve

1 Y2" 100%1" 95%-100%'A" 25%-60%#4 0%-10%#8 0% -5%

WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRS PAGE 31-2 OCTOBER 21,2011TAXATION BUILDINGTRENTON, MERCER COUNTY, NJPROJECT NO. Al 117-00


PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.1 SITE PREPARATION

A. Confirm that the limits of the proposed earthwork are as depicted on the Contract Drawings.

B. Do not begin any fill operations without prior investigation to determine the location of any and all

underground utilities in the vicinity of the proposed earthwork.

C. During a dry and favorable weather period, establish the desired subgrade, level, proof roll, and perform

primary compaction of the subgrade. Conduct compaction tests on the prepared subgrade as specified under

Section 1.7 of these specifications.

3.2 GENERAL EXCAVATION

A. Excavation shall be carried to the limits required by the construction. Material shall be removed to the lines

and depth to allow construction of the various portions of the Project.

B. All excavation shall be unclassified, and all material of whatever character encountered shall be removed,

including bituminous and concrete pavements, footings and foundations, whether shown on the plan, or as

may be encountered during the course of construction.

3.3 EXCESS MATERIAL

A. Excess soil material from excavation, where unsuitable or in excess of material required on the site for

construction, shall be removed from the Project Site.

3.4 DEWATERING

A. If ground or rain water occurs in excavated areas, the Contractor shall dewater by pumping, well pointing or

other approved methods except as herein provided.

3.5 FILL PLACEMENT

A. Do not place fill until the required excavation and foundation preparation have been completed, and have

been inspected and approved by the Architect.

B. Do not place fill on frozen surfaces, or on surfaces covered, or partially covered by snow or ice.

C. Do not place fill that contains frozen material.

D. Place fill in approximately horizontal layers. The thickness of each layer before compaction must be

suitable for the final compacted layer thickness for the fill being placed.

E. Filling and backfilling shall consist of depositing, spreading and compacting of approved materials to be

required elevation indicated. Materials shall consist of suitable earth material, free from debris, organic

substances, frozen materials, clay, or other undesirable material. Borrow of excavated earth shall be

permitted if it is determined by testing to meet the requirements for controlled fill.

F. Fill material shall be placed in 8" to 10" layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly

placed and mixed during the spreading to ensure uniformity of material in each layer. Surface of the fill

shall be kept at a slight slope to facilitate drainage of any ground or surface water that enters the excavation.

The moisture content of the fill material shall be at or slightly below the optimum moisture content for the

soils being utilized during the entire compaction operation. If in the opinion of the Architect or the NJBA

Construction Inspector, the fill is too dry for proper compaction, the Contractor shall spray the fill with

sufficient quantity of clean water to bring the fill to the proper moisture content. No fill material shall be

placed, spread or compacted while the ground or fill is frozen or thawing or during unfavorable conditions.

When work is interrupted by heavy rain, fill operations shall not be resumed unless the moisture content

and density of the fill are as previously specified. The ground water shall be kept a minimum of 2' below

the surface of the fill during the backfilling operation. Compaction of the fill shall be achieved by suitable

methods using roller and/or vibratory compactors of the proper size commensurate with the construction

WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRS PAGE 31-3 OCTOBER 21,2011

TAXATION BUILDING

TRENTON, MERCER COUNTY, NJ

PROJECT No. A 1117-00


area. Manual compactors shall be used within five (5) feet of constructed or existing foundations, walls,slabs.

G. After excavation for footings, exposed footing subgrade shall be compacted by a minimum of two passeswith a "jumping jack" compactor immediately prior to placement of footing concrete and tested forcompaction of 95% maximum dry density.

H. The minimum density to be obtained in the earth backfill and porous fill shall be 95% of "maximumdensity" as defined in ASTM D-698, Compacted soil not meeting required density when tested in placeshall be replaced or removed until additional tests, at Contractor's expenses, indicate compliance withspecifications.

I. Install a minimum 6" layer of #57 stone under all walkway slabs and compact.

3.6 TESTING

A. The Contractor must perform such tests as are necessary to provide the information required for theproper execution of the earthwork described on the Contract Drawings and specified herein.

B. Backfilling/compaction operations shall be controlled by testing. Compaction shall be determined byASTM D-698 and meet the following:

Location Percent Maximum Dry Density(ASTM D-698)

Site (non Load Bearing) 95%

C. Inspection results shall be reported in writing to Architect and Contractor on same day that inspectionsare made. Reports shall contain location, depth of fill, depth of lift, thickness of aggregate base course.The Architect and Contractor are to be notified verbally at the time of inspection of any deviations fromthe construction documents. Report shall note all deviations that were not corrected prior to continuedoperations. Handwritten, legible, initial reports are acceptable.

D. Fill placed at densities lower than that specified, or at moisture contents outside the specified acceptablerange, or otherwise not in conformance with the requirements of this specification, must be re-workedto meet those requirements, or removed and replaced with acceptable material, placed in accordancewith all of the requirements of this specification, and at no additional cost to the State.

3.7 FINAL CLEANUP

A. All areas occupied by the Contractor in connection with the Project shall be cleaned of all rubbish; excessmaterials, temporary structures and equipment, and all parts of the site shall be left in an acceptable condition.

END OF SECTION

WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRS PAGE 31-4 OCTOBER 21,2011TAXATION BUILDINGTRENTON, MERCER COUNTY, NJPROJECT NO. Al 117-00

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REPORTfor

WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRSAT

TAXATION BUILDINGTRENTON, MERCER COUNTY, NJ

DPMC PROJECT No. Al1117-00

Prepared for.

Ronald A. Sebring Associates, LLC405 Richmond Avenue

Point Pleasant Beach, New Jersey 08742

Prepared by:

USA Environmental Management, Inc.344 West State Street

Trenton, New Jersey 08618

USAEMI Project No. 11 -020492-01DPMC Project No. Al 117-00

June 15, 2011 (revised June 30, 2011)

Environmental Engineering Construction

Ronald A. Sebring Associates, LLCWater Infiltration Repairs - Taxation BuildingDPMC Project No. Al 117-00

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary .............................................................................. 3

2.0 Asbestos and Health ............................................................................. 3

3.0 Asbestos Reulations ............................................................................. 4

4.0 Survey Results,..................................................................................... 5

Appendix I Certificates of Analysis, Chain of Custody Records &Materials Photo Log

Appendix 11 Project Documentation/Certificationls

Appendix III PCB In Caulk

Page 2


1.0 Executive Summary

USA Environmental Management, Inc., (USAEMI) was contracted by Ronald A. SebringAssociates, LLC, to conduct a limited environental assessment in conjunction with theproposed Water Infiltration Repairs project of the Taxation Building, located in Trenton, MercerCounty, New Jersey; DPMC Project Number Al 117-00. The purpose of the inspection was todetect the presence or absence of asbestos-containing materials associated with the planned waterinfiltration repairs project.

The inspection for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) was conducted in June 7, 2011, by Mr.John T. Duggan, Jr., and Ms. Nora Pearse. Both Mr. Duggan and Ms. Pearse are certified UnitedStates Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act(AHERA) asbestos building inspectors, with significant experience in ACM survey andremediation project design. Documentation of the inspectors certifications are appended in thisreport.

During the course of its assessment USAEMI noted nine (9) suspect materials which may beimpacted from the proposed work. The suspect materials identified were sampled in sufficientquantity as mandated by 40 CFR, Part 763.87(a). Of the suspect materials sampled, three (3)tested positive for asbestos (greater than 1% by weight). Materials sampled for asbestos contentand/or assumed ACM are listed below.

TAXATION BUILDING - WATER INFILTRATION REPAIRSID _ ~bso

No. M~~fra &YSit~ Conen Quantiy1 Grey Caulk Associated with Sidewalk and Seal of Building None Detected N/A2 Brown Caulk Associated with Granit Panels at Exterior None Detected N/A3 Light Grey Caulk Associated with Precast Concrete Panels at Exterior None Detected N/A4 Grey Caulk Associated with Window Seal at Frame None Detected N/A5 Grey/Brown Glazing Associated with Window Pane None Detected IN/A6 Grey Caulk Associated with Metal Flashing and Door 2% Chrysotile 80 Linear Feet*7 Brown Caulk Associated with Roof Mounted Vents (Intake/Exhaust) 2% Chrysotile 75 Linear Feet*8 Grey Caulk Associated with Metal Girders None Detected N/A9 1 Black Caulk Associated with Building Metal Flashing* 3% Chrysotile 15 Linear Feet*

*Quantities are indicated for areas Client indicated may be impacted during the project.* * Material appeared to be remnant of an existing roof only noted in limited areas. This materialmay exist at all flashing locations.

A discussion of the potential health risks associated with asbestos exposure can be found withinSection 2.0. Section 3.0 discusses potential regulatory issues associated with asbestos. Section4.0 gives a further account of the assessment and sampling methodology used.

2.0 Asbestos and Health

During the last few decades the medical evidence has continued to mount regarding theimportance of environmental factors as a source of carcinogenicity. Asbestos is regulated by the

Page 3

Ronald A. Sebring Associates, LLCWater Infiltration Repairs - Taxation Building

DPMC Project No. Al 1117-00

Occupational Safety and Health Administration, cited by the National lnstitute for Occupational

Safety and Health, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the National Toxicology

Program, and the Carcinogens Assessment Group of the Federal USEPA.

As a result of the pervasive use of this material, asbestos has become a widespread

environmental contaminant for large segments of our society and has been conclusively

demonstrated to cause fibrosis and malignancies of the lung and other organs. The majority of

the evidence comes from industrial exposure to this material, whereas exposures were more

intense and for a greater period of time. However, there is also evidence that low exposures to

asbestos fibers may also have carcinogenic potential.

Asbestos fibers resist degradation and persist in the environment, because of the fibers particular

structure, they possess aerodynamic capabilities for prolonged suspension and repeated cycles of

re-entrainment.

Asbestos fibers find entry into the body by inhalation and through ingestion. The retained fibers

are found in tissues throughout the lifetime of the exposed person - long after cessation of

exposure. It has been demonstrated that asbestos fibers can migrate to other organs.

Malignancies related to inhalation and ingestion include cancer of the lungs, mesotheliomia of the

pleura and peritoneum (lining of the lung and abdominal region), and neoplasms of other sites.

The degree and duration of exposure to develop an asbestos related health disorder is unknown at

this time. However, a report to the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission by the Chronic

Hazard Advisory Panel on Asbestos reports:

From a public health standpoint, and in the absence of final clarifications of the

uncertainties, it is prudent to behave as if asbestos fibers may be carcinogenic at low level

exposure and at small particle sizes.

3.0 Asbestos Re2ulations

The United States Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA) National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS), Asbestos Regulations 40 CER 61, Subpart M, require a

"Ten-Day Notification" sent to the Regional USEPA office (N.Y., N.Y. for Region 11.) prior to

the start of a project. This regulation is primarily for the protection of the environment from

visible emissions of asbestos fibers, with respect to removal and demolition. The EPA also

regulates the use of environmental controls, proper labeling and disposal, of ACM.

The United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration

(OSHA), regulates worker protection. These regulations define a Permissible Exposure Limit

(PEL) over an 8-hour work day as a Time Weighted Average (TWA) and specifically provide for

methods of compliance including engineering controls, work practices, personal protective

equipment, respiratory protective programs, personal monitoring, environmental monitoring,

caution signs, waste disposal, record keeping and medical examinations. It is the Contractor's

responsibility to comply with OSHA regulations.

Page 4


The State of New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs (DCA), regulates asbestosabatement activities at educational, municipal, county and state owned or leased facilities, aspromulgated in New Jersey Administrative Code (NJAC) 5:23-8 et. seq. Removal of asbestosmaterial from the above regulated buildings, meeting certain criteria of linear and/or squarefootage, [greater than ten (10) linear feet and/or greater than twenty-five (25) square feet], andtypes of removal methods, requires a construction permit. However, materials that are deemedas non-friable, such as; floor tile, cement board panels, etc., are not regulated by NJAC 5:23-8 aslong as the removal methods maintain the material intact. Asbestos abatement in facilities thatare to undergo demolition or that are privately owned, with exception to educational facilities(K- 12 and Colleges), are not within the jurisdiction of NJAC 5:23 -8.

The removal of roofing materials, such as; tar paper, asphalt roof, flashing, etc., duringrenovation activities require proper disposal in accordance with the State of New Jersey,Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). When a building, or a portion of the building,is scheduled for demolition roofing materials are required to be removed and disposed of bylicensed Contractors/individuals, in accordance with NJAC 12:120-1 .4(b)5.

The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DOLWD), licensesContractors and individuals that perform asbestos abatement work. A licensed AsbestosAbatement Contractor is required when materials greater than three (3) square or linear are to bedisturbed. The DOLWD also mandates air sampling protocols where NJAC 5:23-8 is notapplicable to a project.

DEP regulates the disposal of asbestos containing materials in accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:26-12et seq. The DEP regulations pertain to the generator's requirements for the management,transportation and disposal of asbestos containing material (ACM). Asbestos Containing WasteMaterial (ACWM) that contains greater than or equal to 1% of asbestos, as determined byPolarized Light Microscopy. Asbestos waste is disposed of as ID #27A waste as defined atN.J.A.C. 7:26-2.1 3(g)viii.

The State of New Jersey, Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), conductsNESHAPS inspections for the EPA. lIn addition, the DHSS performs inspections to ensureproper abatement methods are being utilized to protect the health of occupants. As with theEPA, a "Ten Day Notification" is filed with the DCA, DHSS and DOLWD for inspectionpurposes.

4.0 Survey Results

This survey was confined to those materials that USAEMI considered to be suspect asbestos-containing materials. This survey was performed during daytime hours. Throughout theassessment, EPA AHERA, 40 CFR, Part 763 protocol was stringently observed. All of thesamples collected were in areas where damage already existed. All bulk samples extracted weretaken in compliance with 40 CFR, Part 763.86. Prior to each sampling effort, the material wasspray-misted using amended water. This precautionary measure was employed to preventairborne fiber emissions. All sampled materials were individually packaged to preventcontamination. Samples were delivered to an independent laboratory and analysis was

Page 5

Ronald A. Sebring Associates, LLCWater Infiltration Repairs -Taxation BuildingDPMC Project No. Al 1117-00

performed via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with 40 CER, Part 763.87(a)

and/or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The results of each sample and corresponding

Certificates of Analysis are appended to this report. Results include the type and percentage of

asbestos, if found in the sampled material, and the method of analysis.

The exterior materials which may be impacted by the Water Infiltration Repairs project were

surveyed and tested for asbestos content. USAEMI found nine (9) suspect asbestos-containing

materials. Of the materials sampled, three (3) were determined to be positive for asbestos

(greater than 1% of asbestos by weight) and/or assumed to be asbestos-containing.

Disclaimer

The client should be aware that this survey did not incorporate destructive demolition to access

hidden or obscured asbestos-containing materials (ACM). Non-observable asbestos -containing

materials found in such areas as vinyl asbestos floor tile which has been overlaid with plywood,

insulated piping lines in wall cavities, asbestos nailcrete below tongue and groove flooring,internal boiler ACM, ACM on pipes buried in concrete slabs and other potential ACM which isinaccessible for sample extraction due to the physical coverage of the material. USAEMII will

assure, however, that due diligence is observed in performing sampling by generally recognized

industry sampling practices.

PCB's in Caulk

Section 1.0 Introduction

USA Environmental Management, Inc., (USAEMI) conducted an inspection for suspect

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in caulks and glazing's that could be potentially impacted the

exterior repair project at the subject located in Trenton New Jersey. DPMC Project No. Al 117-00.

Site activities were confined to those locations where exterior building seam caulk and windows

will be impacted and/or removed to facilitate the aforementioned upgrades. Suspect PCB3

containing window glazing's and caulks were identified in the grey/brown window glazing and

in the caulk associated with the pre-cast white exterior panels.

The inspection was completed by Ms. Nora Pearce. Ms. Pearce is Hazardous Waste Operations

and Emergency Responder (HAZWOPER) certified, as per 29 CFR, Part 1910.120. Mr.

Newsome provided technical assistance. Analytical services were provided by EMSL

Analytical, Inc., of Cinnaminson, New Jersey. EMSL Analytical, Inc., is accredited by the

American Industrial Hygiene Association (AHIA) and is certified by the State of New Jersey,Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). EMSL Analytical, Inc., is also pre-qualified

by the State of New Jersey, Department of the Treasury, Division of Property Management and

Construction (DPMC).

Section 2.0 Discussion on PCBs

Page 6


PCBs were widely utilized between 1929 and 1977 in the United States as coolants andlubricants in electrical equipment (i.e., capacitors, transformers, light ballasts, appliances),plasticizers, surface coatings, inks, adhesives, flame retardants, pesticides, paints and carbonlessduplicating paper, for their insulating properties, chemical stability and relative inflammability.Many of the products in the United States were manufactured by the Monsanto Corporation andmarketed under the name Aroclor. There are different types of Aroclor, based on theconcentrations of chlorine. Four (4) digit numbers followed the name Aroclor, where the lasttwo (2) numbers indicated the percent of chlorine content by weight.

PCB products were banned in the United States in 1977. However, the environmental impact ofPCBs is still evident with the accidental release from the spill of electrical equipment still in use,and/or incomplete combustion of PCB products in fires. Releases impact the soil or water byvolatilization and cycled to the atmosphere and returned to the soil.

Epidemiological information for the human health effects from PCBs is based on animal toxicitystudies. There is general information, however, on observed health effects in humans. Skinirritations, such as acne and rashes, can occur from dermal contact. Nose, eye and lungirritations have also been reported from inhalation of ftumes from volatilization of PCBs. It hasalso been noted that animals suffer, liver, stomach, and thyroid gland damage from oral contactwith PCB contaminated food. Liver, kidney and skin damage was noted from dermal contactand kidney damage was documented from inhalation in animals. Currently, the United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has classified PCBs as a possible human carcinogenbased on animal studies. It is also believed that different PCB mixtures vary in potency, andcould possibly cause reproductive organ damage in humans.

Recently, PCBs in caulk has become a prevalent issue within the United States, prompted bystudies conducted in Finland. The Finland investigation revealed a correlation between PCBs incaulk and that of airborne PCBs and PCBs in blood of construction workers coming in contactwith such materials. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulatesdisposal of caulking that contains >50 parts per million under the Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA) and PCB regulations, 40 CFR, Part 761.

Section 3.0 PCB Sampling Strategy, Sample Extraction and Analysis

USAEMI collected composite samples of exterior window glazing's and caulk from the TaxationBuilding. Approximately four (4) grams of material was extracted and submitted for eachcomposite sampled location. Samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc., in accordancewith ASTM D 5755.

Section 4.0 PCB Results

The USEPA defines PCB 's as those materials which are greater than, or equal to, 50 milligramsper Kilogram (mg/Kg), which is equivalent to 50 parts per million (ppm). Many of the productsin the United States were manufactured by the Monsanto Corporation and marketed under thename Aroclor. There are different types of Aroclor, based on the concentrations of chlorine.

Page 7


Four (4) digit numbers followed the name Aroclor, where the last two (2) numbers indicated the

percent of chlorine content by weight. PCB's were identified in two (2) of the materials

sampled as part of our assessment as follows:

SampeLctonMtra Aroclor Detected

Sample Number Glazing Between Window Aroclor 10 16 - <46 mg/Kg

05NP06071 109 and Window Frame Aroclor 1221 - <46 mg/Kg

Grey/Brown Window Glazing Aroclor 1232 - <46 mg/KgAroclor 1242 - <46 mg/KgAroclor 1248 - <46 mg/KgAroclor 1254 - 630 mg/KgAroclor 1260 - <46 mg/KgAroclor 1262 - <46 mg/KgAroclor 1268 - 1 100 mg/Kg

___________________Total 1730 mg/Kg (PPM)

Sample Number Caulk Between Precast Aroclor 10 16 - <44 mg/Kg

03NP06071 105 Concrete Panels Aroclor 1221 - <44 mg/Kg

Light Grey Caulk A/W Precast Aroclor 1232 - <44 mg/Kg

Concrete Panels Aroclor 1242 - <44 mg/KgAroclor 1248 - <44 mg/KgAroclor 1254 - 740 mg/KgAroclor 1260 - <44 mg/KgAroclor 1262 - <44 mg/KgAroclor 1268 - <44 mg/Kg

___________________Total 740 mg/Kg (PPM)

Section 5.0 PCB Recommendations

Based on the analytical results above, the glazing associated with window glazing and precast

concrete panels is a PCB contaminated material. The precast concrete panel caulk and windows,if being removed and replaced, will require removal by an experienced Environmental

Remediation Contractor. Personnel conducting the abatement work will, at a minimum, be

required have lead awareness training. A conservative approach would required workers to

maintain Hazardous Waste Operations Training (HAZWOPER).

There are a number of disposal options for the impacted materials; contingent upon the levels of

PCB's found in the materials. Materials revealing PCB concentrations between 0-50 ppm are

considered PCB Containing and can most likely be disposed of as a construction waste under

NJDEP guidance. Materials revealing PCB concentrations between 50-500 ppm are considered

PCB Contaminated, will require NJDEP and USEPA disposal under the TSCA requirements

(treatment & landfill at Environmental Quality in Michigan). Materials revealing PCB

concentrations greater than 500 ppm will require NJDEP and USEPA disposal under the TSCA

requirements (incineration at Clean Harbors in Alabama).

Page 8


The extent of abatement is also an item for discussion as EPA recommends scarifying porous substraights where PCB caulks have been located as the PCB's have been known to migrate fromthe caulks to the porous sub straight (in some cases 1/4 to 1 inch away from the seam location).We would recommend further testing and analysis prior to specifying any abatement actionsassociated with these materials. The additional testing and analysis would include at least 3additional bulk samples of each material that tested positive and wipe samples of the remainingscarified sub straights. The bulk samples would confirm the previous analytical data and thewipe samples would assist in determining the amount of scarification required to achieve a cleansub straight.

Page 9

APPENDIX I

Certificates of Analysis, Chain of Custody Records &Materials Photo Log

APPENDIX I

Sample No, 0 1 NP06071 I 01 -03

Material ID, Dd. 01

_sarnjle Results: ND

Sample No, 02NP060711 04-06,

Material 11) Do. 02

Sample Results- ND

Sample No. 03NP06071 f'07-09

Material ID Do. 03

SamleF~euts:ND

SAVRPLE RESULTS LAEGEND:Nb - NONE DETECTEDPOS = ASBESTOS-GONATING MATERIALLT - LE-SS THAN 1% ASBESTOS, NON-REG3ULATE0 MATERL

FP = STOP AT FIRST POSITIVE, PRIOR SAw4PLE POSITIVe

APPENDIX I

Sample No. 04NP060711 10-12

,Aitertai ID Do 04

Saqmp e Results: NO

Saple No, 05NP060711 13-15 __

DDo,05 - _

Material ID Do- 06

Sample Results, P05

SAMPLE RESULTS LEGEHO:

POS ~ ~ 7 %IASQSO rTN I'AtIT LESTA %AESO.NNRQLTOMATERIAL

SEP TOPAT ~STPOSTIVE, PRIR SAfM4PLE IosVe

APPENDIX, I

Sample No.. 07NPO60711 1.9-21

-Material ID Do, 07

Sample Remitts: POS

Sample No- 08NP06071 1 22-24

Material ID Do. 08

Sam pte Results ND

SapeNo- 09NP060711 25-27

Mater~i ID Do, 09

Sample f sults: POS

sAMPLE RSUL.TS LIEGEW.NO =NON ITE0TED

POS - ASREST0S-CONA11NG MATER~IALLT L=STHAN 1% ASBESTOS, NON-REGULATED MATERIALVFP S= TOP AT FIRST POSmTVE, PRIOR, SAMPLE POSITVE

Asb esatos - Lead -Envircrmental r Nfteriats & Indoor Air Andy4s

4;- ~ FMSL Analytical, Inc.200 Rout, 130 NouNh Choamrinson, MJ G9077vh~orn 00-M2fl -'i V X' (a5A 78-5;Z74 Web: t:esnoeau owe.ruEcr )*m

Attn: Joh, ijgoan EMSL Order. 041114493US'A E-invrnmentnl IMngmt.Inc- Custome-r 0:- USA53

:j44 Wel tt S Covicted: 67/011 12:00:OOAM

TrnoNJ 08618, Received: &/07/201 1

Fax: (-30131656-8103 Phone: (609)6516-8101P roJ: RONA" LD A. SEBPING ASSOCIATESAWATER INFILTRATIOIN REPAIRS/TAXATION R1UILDING/DPMC, PROJECT

NiO Al 117-00/1 1-020402-1

Summary Test Report for Asbestos Anialysis in Accordance with N.J.A.C. 8:60and 12:120 via EPA 600IR-931116

ck~n? Sam GI 0NM00711 01 Lab Se7pe'O fa11449i OQDl

a ~ ~ ~ r Apa~ ET, VWA 0 oga 011 T JO C N,'- 0 1

TES7 D]ate Color Fibis ,-, r.- Abestos Commient

PLM GnavC1 A 0% 10% e ted

S~,u:~ ~afo~i EXT- SI0EVMAJ000E R GROUr JO NO cl

n~ly-rd N n-Abesatcs7EST D~1 Ca i4tow ibo No-r 7t-j Asb0osios Corrmen

PLM i qOu21 34 0Nona Deteted

(Jeu p 0 ONPCO07i1 03 LWO SarnpM- 01 0411 '4410

S~o Ooipf00 EXT, SDWL01 ROUT 00D NO of

Analyzed M jr,-AsbeE,

TEMF Grav- Reduction 012 1Gray aa -ov NueDetteted

0000Sope0 02UP0607i 1 04 -VR AL DN sam fet a-, 0,4114413-0004

S~mp~a esmW~w -xT.ViLOD ST.T ENCU

TEST Cdcle 000iju C N-Fireur At

PLM 1 ua ~ 0 100% None Detected

-'0OSen, 0 02t4P00171 1 05 Lab SWUlrO f0 QA411 4,-93-O01Sctoape o"Cempva" EXT, STATE S7,EBERN CAULK NO 12

TE$T Date of0 Fsbmro Nan-FivouCommento

-5, 050110I 1 0% 100% Hone Detecto4

~t -u 0 0NP060711 06 LabE Sarple 10, 04' 114401-tJ0C4

$aoolo~'r'o EX. ILLW T DE N CA-Li( I-) N'. 2

TEST 1-010 Pac Firou5 i,,, o~ Comment

PId 10001 rM~ % gO Nore Ojeterted

fhm G(y, Rductl 1021 onw N~~ai.tone Dotted

Glr1 ~r0 I 3KNP0E*?1 07 AUVLab Sampke 0:. 0411 r4403-007

Anai!j2edN -Abaerssr ~ ~ ~ ~ ' oft Fck Fre n-brc. ~ .~tele Oa

PLM g~~~0 ray% 10%Na DejeQCted

fj-Tosl Saipu 0 03HP093711 Oa Lab Saipe 10- 414410

S'EM~0821 1 Gra % 1 None Detocted

Teac itP5uel~ iA03i Or~d 101 I1 AA Pag 1 of 4

EMSL At~cal Inc.Atbi: John Dlg ' qIt~ EMS. AnaytI~aI~ ~USA En iopiamntaf Monsgm~t gc

200 ot 3 Not Onaiaso NJ OO7 .k44 wes tit Sii t

~~,( h MnJf- M L(- Tre-ntor NJ 08618

Profj: RON~ALD A- SESR1G ASSOCIATE54 TER INFILTR

Sumary Test Reportfor Abestos Analysis In Accordane with. N.J.A.C. 8-,HCN" ~Ssnmpf6I,t l03NP06011 09 tab $Iflrp- IV. 01114493-0M19

SaMO*D&SC~p*M EKT, WLLOV-.ST"LlGHT GFRY CAULK 1O fNG 3

TEST Dale .Color rjirmZ .4 Asbestos Cornmen4

TEM 6G06l20 Rflcto 0tw,'ia ~% 100%/ Mone oetctod

uaenf Sampl* v O4NP0MC71 10 441wti~~01 14$OIS~mpa Dscr on, EX. TIT FLIOR Y CAULK UD 00 4

An~ed 'Non.Mbea6tosTE$T Date C0IGI' F*Musi Non-FibmraAxe-hs Comn

100Q4PWV% 1 Lab Sainpkt effl 04t114491-0011Samp esc~,borr EXT STATE SV3R.YCAULK IDO o4

QrY0% 10O No"i 066Agatac'Intsampi fvn 0NPOOTI I 12 L~ S wnpb# 1&, 44~~4t

8w7in* e fa~oon EXTAMWLLOW ST43RY CAULK ?0 NO 4

Analzed Nofl-Atbe..tosTEST D0e Coo ru o-irosAbso omn

P1M 0M. Rd2011 0%M 100% Mort* Dmbec4Id

0JIt emlefDl dopC6O711 t3 Lab Satnp* I d4j114493-t013qsftknDpho; EXT. FLOOR 1 01GRYIB1RN GLA40W Il 5O

Analyzd Noh-AsbelllbTEST Date CaOW iru orFims Asbeetas Comment

PLU WW011 arowop-my0% 1 004A

Cje opf)0- O4P9PI 114 Lab Sti§*10,1D 041114493-0014Samp D On~on- EXT. FLOOR~ 8IRYYBRNq GLAZjNG 60 NO 5

Analyzed NoiUsbealoTEST DaeColor' Fibrous Non-fbou Ashesto CmmPL rvra 0% 1000%No J Dcoftctad

ce~ sarplt00 Loba07 115~!0 4 14a~o,Spale Dmov EXT.GR~OUND F LOGR RR6Rf.LAZlNG. 10 1*0 5 6 epel 01149-0

Analyze~oNon-AsestnaTEST Date ftfour lbWt -frLU ARsebs comrflant- ------ 6)0&2011 a" BrowGitr& 0% 1 00% NoeDow C W

~TEA Gpw Redew~a siWW2011 Brwn00% 1ioooolDtol~

C~r jqp6J. OuNPW111 "ray Caulk LaP Sethnp*In 0.~ 493~tSv.inp 063a~nlP ROOcF - AT METAL PLASH'ftRY CAULK I$=D NO 6

Anatyzed Nor'.AshesatTEST Date Color F~bows Nas-ibou A*4fttos Cm

#Ct*V Sat*10 JD SPG71IsTnCukLb Sam~ple 1 041 1144113-0016A&*MiV,~scrpn ROOF -0O AT MFTAI- FL.A$I1IVGR.Y CAULK I l) NO 6

TE7DteGif Fhmanus Noibo~ Asbesos Comment- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #2~ ----- --------- Tan ... ... ...AA Nc~tw&Dvt - -1 11 ,-- !- --- ---

.T ..P.. ... -................. . oof 4

Aft, John iu~j

EISIL Analytical, 11-c, tlISA I-,t Mgnne

I)K P- tAe 130 ......innA~. T.j I IAF77 3~WitSae7EtflNJ ~S~

Proj, RONALD A, SEBRINOG ASS DCIATES'ATER filW ItoIL

Summary Test Report for Asbestos Analysis in Accordance with N.J .A.C. 8:60

0et mcatrv OGNP060711 17 Lab Sanple fD: C4 tlAA49-CD17

S&MPLe p&q~iP0r' KOO-F - A T WETA L F-ASHIGRY CALK S NO 6

TEST E'AteCtt Fbc. o- Asbestri C.~irtr1,nt

PflE4 60&21 Tg- 0 4% V. Chrysat4il

!:k'rt S 'impt 1t GNP060711 IS-GrayCaulk $ml0 041 114491-O0'5

Stt~bCc'ptL~. COF04 ATO2.,AL rLAIH!GE CAULK lrS=O NO 0

TEST Color t'. A: brstos Comment

6L &.tziSC Stop Ptoltive (o Analyzed)

C~er4 Steo 58,"6TI SCa tptn e0., 14 111-4493-0019

Oempe'a xvartc ROOPC AT MONTS BRN CAUL'( _1 NO 7

lj~zed Nn-Asbat-s

TEST EaeCOW~ Fbrnc.s Non-F'brous

PLL4 5151001 <c % 12-1% ctwysotiIq

Cie.r0 ~ 07 l: ONPOSO7I1 20 LaS (T D:0 01 i 02

0a~p~O CO -AT V TiEJ CAULKI If, NO 7

T-Ef oo Filrous Asbestosu C nrimne,

0200011 ruwn 01% P44 %CrstI

0,:tt IC 7NFtI6071I 21 Lan Sam?,qe 10L: 041114,491-M210~m~ O S" R001- ATVEN1mA C IJAUL,: C N)

Dat, S Comamom

I EST Dale Cohn r-brt),~~a t-on-F'ru 1III Omri

PLM S~i~ 1ttop flositlw (Not Analtyzed)

08 ONFI4C71 22 1 00.1%0 041 140-0

StE~~~pleQ acl nKo AT GIRDFRSO' CAULK

Anal~zed Nn 4

o~

TEST Cae Cor Fih-ooz W,,-E'it-.mbau om'

FL" 0 8,121 1 1 konCNaen"tc

O~eti? Sml 0 C8P060 11 73 La&aPre tt 041114-493-1802,3

Sampe 0ecE~ta~ 0CR-AT IRDERIGRY GAUL,',

TEST _FaLOQ n~rua Nqn-Fbroua sa.E ~ .a1rel

nlro Sampl 02 8HP06011 2 4 Lab StEiple JD 0414 144S5.0074Sap es (-', t ROO-)F - AT GRESIGRY CAULK

TT , T0'i irusNFb'u AE-bestos CommEnt

PLM1110% 10 Nonea Detected

trM Gry Peoucton 51001 Eiar CO. 0%None~ Metacfad

PLM %0101Sak % 1JJ o.1 Dtctod

naca5.CNOOI12 Lab SamTple SO 0111,449--02

TES-T UaeClr Fbou .o-ims je~ omn

PLM F1t0 2 11iack ... ..... .....4 ~ .. - --- - - -

Pag. e 3 cf 4

EMSL AnalyuA Inc Attn: John DugganUSA Envionwmenal M~pnavt kmo.

W lw 1$00 22) to4 WI F~w o aw 71 "4 Wwb: Trntn NJ 086 II B

PRONL 4QA. SERN ASOITSAE NFILTR

,Summary Test Report for Abetos An*4iysI in Ac-cordume with N.J.AC. 8-60

OfmPbve'P~~ ROO>F -81-00 METAL FLASHIIG/fiU( CALtK 10 NO 9

TEST - Vow F Non-Fotwous A4bO~t* Corrn ment.~/Qm~o11Stop-P-teiv ($lot Adaubyd)

ouie Litl TEM Gfay Reductin (6)Frak Mlr PL

Aq pR ~ 4 PL Stpe Sigel rfH, LawMNia

~~~~o fOfIU, AppVave IWi2, n4bB~~

Arer~P~4at? q.uG1OiQ11 please cotc sff 4igl

~ USA Environmental Mattagecment, Inc.344 ~~ tes F~G ee t

I rerv f n. Nexv irsev 0)86 f l

0411114493C,111,NT: R OdI. brt Aoct DATE: P ___TVQFAAYIRQI)D

P RZO J C T : a ~ Ii 3 w n m ~ Ar T E C H N I CIA N : . 1 & , -

B ULK SALMLE DA TA AND CJA IN OF CJS TODYI FORM -

SiOPLE ID MA T MIA L SAMPLE~ LOCATION~ QINT ADrnTWNAL ANALYSI

I ~ LI Ir A~~ Kf"'"

1 1 I FM tVA NI I.

El~ VA 1] fh' i - ;L{ kf~J:j7u3~fOt~i0 ______________

13A5A&bfJJt ~IY-PA_____________ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ,;o DT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

I ___________________________F

I iuuL

COMMENTS: _____________

UiSA Entvronkmental Management, Inc.344 Wesr Stt Strcet

Ti ne ~w Jersey 080 IS

04 111 4493CLIENT: Rui A.______ Sebring Asocaa AE:TYEOFA Y77E7[BUILDIN(G: In -~u _______ PRW1ICT 1~ -01 :

BUtLKSAMPLE DA TA AND CHJAIN OF CUSTODYFOAM

SM wMATER2IAL SAMPLE LOCATION QUAN'FITY ADDr0TAL ANALY5s

XT

Ell 41WA I- WINoc lxtloct

iIAT 0 T~MA NOW~ if t~c Occ4l jyM

0 TVhI 1*JA NO),if ENone O cf b&lMk

OV1c'u W313, by I'

"ctko Rv DI.j iE

kVSA Erirvrrroa

~141I~~3 ~USA Environmnental Managemnent, Inc.'344 Wes( Siat,,ttree(

Tirxton, Ncv J On }

041 11449301 V ,W: itftnddA Amdt AF 6 O1 ci /r 1'L oYWr sI's 1 rdQuI ifF

UIDN PRO.WC JI?:. !24j~r I__

BULK SAMPLE DATAAND CI7J N (WCfSTOD Y FORM

-MTRA &MILL LOCATION Q~ 'u DITOAA'A ~~

~$\0 1~. .. A N( M , 0, NP;l (ItI. t d by '

jI q E I A "'A I N (I)x'I IM

Eli I I- FI A N' )J, ii I 4

_______________________________________________ __________ -~ IP ~ F

TURN-ARUND-1 ME 1 v D VI F f I REE VD ill 1),Pz~~~- - _ __ _ _ _ _

if~:~I '

~ V IA A -lii k'wd'~PV

COMMENTS:T IM ________

Fax: (8,56) 858"471

Attn. John T' Duggani, Jr.UiSA Environmental Management lne,344 West State StTrenton, NJ 08618 8&2012,0111Phonte, (809) 656-81 01Fax: (609) 656-8103

Theo following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted toEMSL Analytical, Inc. on 61812011. The results are tabulated on the attled data pagesfor the Wolowing client designated project

U$AEMI NG. 11- 020492-01; Water Infiltratlo" lRepalre, TaxationvOuilding, DPMC All 17

The retrerice number for these samples is EMSL Order #011102794. Please use thisreference when calling about these sample&. If you havie any quetions, please do notbesitate to contact me~ at (856) 850-4800,

Reviewer! and Approved By-

Jfle Smith - Laborator~y Dlet~rohraproved

Tht reuls riaWmd whhinf tpr -~nat t,rq~akeinof NELAO wmo

NELp jefiron NJ 0465,3, NY 10896. PA 68-M0367

e saphis asocated with thi repott were tecelved in good condftlp unless otherise noted. Thig tpot relsos only to time Items lailed asF 6qedblhe rabrmy- The QC data vsouatd with the sam~ple resufts meet t rbcovery ano ptoo requireents etoWisbad by' theAVLAP, unless sper ifcally Indated l Mresuf for sod samples are reported on a dry weigh~t basis, uwitess otheiwlese nowut This report may notWfdedqM o(1 n __fil wr!pqa Ep M~lbyK An$ia nc.

L AnlytialInc.

Attn John T. Duggan, Jr. Custmer 10 LSAb3

USA Environmental Management. Inc. CustmerPC!

344 West State St. RLOv- 01M1 12:00 PM

Trenton, NJ 08618 ?MSL rder 011102794

F m EE5- S38103 Pione: (609) 656-8S101

Pmc USAEMI No. 11 -020492-GI: Water Infiltratjan Rapa1m,Tayation 0tnOding, DPMC All 1

Analytical Results

CtIi-t saptpfe L)d~n ?71 101 Collected: 6IT-2011 LM ID: 6001

3541(8002 Arnd 10 -2 N D 0-30 mg Kg 12 0eni

2'41 26A2Aod$iz ND 0.30 :ng/KO 6/112011 etmrnandoz

34/02Aronlor-1242 NO 030Q nl"'g W16')2011 ehernandez

154U/6032 c-o 28NO 030" mripKr 0il6I 01l ehemndez

A7in-134l 022 '< mw/K 5i162o1 ehemandez

yi~Ar ,+mf-1r 1 3 0,30 1 h P Y/610 ~ n rdrez

34/02NO 0,30 mqKg GV 16V1:2G11 pbemndaz

i' n Arccfor- !0 ND 0,3 0 rngYKg 3.16/2011 eI1rflantneZ

(1neid GVVjC'p1e 1~p~~0006202 C'alle-fe.d ~3g7/2 311 Lak ID, 30

8eparig

MeldPrwrResulti Lit 1,fit Ania~is Dafe kalyst

3W 3M0& AoClor-IG16 NO 0146 r i , 1K 6 1- 10 11 ehernandez

.1 , /806C ArocL r- 221 N13 046 rng.Kg 6 1 61201 Q henoz

304162 -,'l 32 N Q 0_48 gh ~ 1 6hargpe304116002je~ PA~ir14 ND 05m0 /6201 aenanez

31, PC2 &'lr15 .5 .8 :~ g615)2011 '_' -1 !Oz

3041/6062 rn~r~I262NO WA ~/< 115!2011 Oh rn~

3541/6S382 ArG6-20ND 04"1 IWg)'Y9 I/521 nrn

Ucll iupe pe'ip' CE1NPO6OT1 1,3 1~~e: 621 Lab JO: C463

~faod cnnier efut 1J1! UIL Aiwly~1s IUnc 1wyn

Am1 bor- 12,4 Na 0.4 2 rg/K n/421 nh;riz

3641i6082 r -2I1 N 0 0.42 mWf(< 0/4201ejr~

3154 i1/808;2 f j Ar1- 1262 HD 9,42 -vri/g -/42 hemaridez

EMSL Analytical Inc.

Aft: John T. Duggan, Jr. OUStornerID: USA3USA Environmental ManeMnst 1 Inc. cusitomer PO:344 West State St.Rc~e: 0/61 20PTrenton, NJ 08618 EMSL Order 011 102794

Fax: (e(5650-8103 Phone: (609) 058melj

Taxadn Builing, CWMt Ali17

Analytical Results

35411302 AtlA2SND QA2 (01(9614*11 cemie

Ciarmn&Wwlebescrlpfla ONPOO71104 Collared: WPM1201 'Lab/1& 0004

MtdPMEWRelull Repnft tl uO4Xe Anys

3541/8082 NMIGOP 4 0.44 r9/J~g 6/i44/Zti eh~pnandez3541/1W$2 Arodor-122I NO 0,4Mnlg 611V2l011 rhefnrst@e

3,541s808 Aroror-1 232 KID 0.44 RmgKg on14u2011 eftembndez.35411806 MAtoo-24 fND 0-4 Dg( W141 1 ehemandez,354t/80,82 $eodor-12418 NO 0.44 mig/Kg 6114120g Swnmdez354MG082 ArC"fot.1254 1.7 0.44 mgikg 6114)201 ehwnarez3541/B88 Atodfor-12 tOX 0A4 mig/Kg &/1412011 *mundoz3541/8082 Amodatr-262 NO 0,44 mg;/K, 6114=h1 eelhndes

3541I8 A(14-28.O4 mg/Kg 44*011f Semmrndez

0Mmui~dencdt~ 03P091105Cb/ret~. 61712011 we IM: 000

Repwtdirg*14D4 Res1,411Vwi Anaowtv Daie Analyst

35411808 Atodor11 NO 44 flg/1g 64W5/014 ehbthandia3,641/16%2 Awedor4122l ND 44 mng/g 611 5W1 I !hemnalde*3341=802 Arod&1232 NO 44 4ngKg V15ionon qltmnaode±154118082 Aftcte4242 NO 44 mg/VKg &12f ern hemniandezss.4i1sg$* Aradordja NO 44 mgstc atoll1 ehiinlez.3541/8082 Aroclor1254 740 44 nw/Kg &/15/2011 uhemaudez.3641/802 Ard10280 ND 44 "gKg 811&201 herpaitd&3641/8082 Akddor-1 262 NO 44 ing/g 8/INZOI I ehesiwndez3541IM92 Atdoo-120e NO) 44 mgfl; &M8/011 fthetiandez

tMlet santes f44w.o 0280071 10$ bC64 6f7t20t 1 Lab ID;0008

Aethod RMS** UrLit UitI Anlmyis D/ate AnwtjWv

354411082 Aroldr-t11 NDb O 27 mgVKq 6,(154011 ehtrnemp3541/6082 Arocot-421 ND 0,27 mfigt 8htsagi tean dez

SP~inided&*WOMi 114&802 PM. aqf&.

ErMSL1 Anialytical, Inc,

A~a John T. Dtiggan, Jr Cur yior 10: USA53

US5A Environmental Management, Inc. Custwer PO:344 West State St. Receved; 00/611 112;00 RM

Trentoni, NJ 08618 EIASL Ordeor 0111 C2794

Fa:1C509 600-810 3 Pn.one' "5430}5f,6-51 01

Taxat lo Building, C PMC All,17

Analytical Results

(7erL1~kDexcfpfon 0 2 N P 1-,37 10/3 Co1igced" P61720' 1 L,8 fID: 04"6

Reporfifig

A/PfrdTResftft b/of/d t)ji' Anfw ae4uv

3' 100 ~ ~ r-22NO 0.27 rng/4g 6/1W011 ellarfandun -

36 882Accor122NO 0.27 frvgiKg cv 1 Fo 11 ohirnandez

31/02Aroclor..1248 ND 0,27 mggKg 611 E4201 i oerrandez

361622Arocn -r-1254 1.4 0-27 mg,/Kq U1061201 hemandez

35 411800C2 Arn- 210 No U27 mg,?Kg 611512011 chrnr3ez

i4/C2Ara,- :6 ', D 0-27 p-g/Kg I I e53 7oeno.do ie

35.40082 Arccl1 68 031 0,27 ;rgKq33ii21 f~l~

(V/'l~ "'i'i" L'; LFeft 0 InpOOO7 101 gle7e7 6.1t2011 Lab' MD OOJ

$5 (06 Ad>~~6ND D120 rngiK9 6115/2011 Anran

30411I82 Artn-21NO 0.20, rnQ/K 6:0211n-d

3s '_-- 8 AicdI 49.12A2 NQ 0.2 6111( 61Y2011 ehemandez

.3 641 '180 ~o-2 ND 0,2C. MTK9 6f115/21I ohornando4

A88 cr.26 No 026 mg -Kg 6,-1542011 eherranduz

1416 8 ~~i~ 2 0N 0.53 m u/K g 6/10/l-201 I - t ra --F d z

304/602 rocor 120 ND 0.5 mgl<K 6)116u20 I ehernardoz

Cli~jG in 4P67 1 10 Ggfrdd 67?2 Labh 1D 006/1

541(0062 A~T100ND 0.3?' i~f 61"15!2 011 ahemandez

~041a032Arodclr-1 NC) 0.37 TC1( /3121 eh e Ma nd:ez

5.41/605 Cm~~3 NO 03' mgKi 6110ozi

54102 Aiclr1 24 ND 0.3 mC K 6/5201,~n

541180Ai2 Ar~ -20 r, 0.7 -,K 11101 uhemAride354 1/8082 Amu-22N .3 gK /5201oennc

354,1 /K862 rdf 2006 .7lgK /521 rln

L~m0 ~ -jNF n ~ I1 I Ari61 r?0211452P Page 4 of 5

EMSL Analytical, Inc,

AUnM John T, Duggan, Jr., C*MOet 10 USA63U$A E vironrme 'ntal Wihagemen,0C CutoenPcI.344 West Stat St. Reeied O8 112i;Oo PMTrentorn, NJ 08618 EM34. 0OIer" 011 1074

Fax: ('60) 6568103 Phone-- (609) 68101~Priqk; USAMf No. 11-020492-01; Water Inhilixtraort RapgjMi

Taxation BudKig, DPUC Al I I

am(S i'qk O06 qNPO871 109 CFIMIMA' 8tfl2Oi L~b 1,D, 000

541148M Aroclor-1016 NO 46 motKq V(15r2MIemiatincez3541/W082 Aroolor- 221 t 46 mt 6)52$ awn3541/808 Arocto;-1232 NDt 46 m'fKg 6/1&2Z011 ohemandeA3641/8082 Xocdor.1 242 ND 461 51/ M2011 ehrndez

3546082 Aroclor-1248 H 48 nmg1Kq 61512O1 ohemradez51IM082 Arocim1254 46Mf 1 01eead

a51802Aoo~or-120 ND 46 mglKq- 611DI hmnt3541188 Aroclor-2OZ NO 46 sm1gK9 &/j51 I aeinandez

A4/0P oclor-125a 1100, 46 mrq/Kg f&2011 ehernandez

NO - Indicats th te~t nalpws not detected at the te~ On~*

Prold frpql1 MPf ag o

79 f

CC

to1

. aa~ 3 'l i'10 Z"a -as~ ~

00

zi Ec3 (U

to

w w 41cc Qf60

UlU

-II

gnA

I.k

i~Ci

APPENDIX 11

Prj ect Documentation /Certifications

0040z

00

12I-u' 6

0.0 ~ tQmom

IIMH 83

mom f0

National VoluntaryLaboratory Accreditation Program

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/ftC 17025:2005

lr!.NSL Analytical, Ine,200 Route 130 North

Cinnamnson, NJ 09077Mr. Stephen Siegel, C11-1

Phione , 800-220-3675 Fax: 856-786-5973Ei-Ma il: ssiegC1"'~cns1 .Com1URL: http-,./wxw.einsl.com

BULK, ASBESTOS FIBERA-NALYSIS (11M) NVLAP LAH CODE 101048-0

NVLAP Code Desigtiatioft /DescriPtionf

I S/A0 I EpA-60WN14-92-020; Interim MNethod for the Determiniation of Asbestas in Bulk Ipsulation

Samtples

2010-07-01 thioug~h 20 L11-06-30 L fEfcuhw( 4ates Fof die fainnkuofStda n chrdog

Iae of I NVLAP-CJIS (REV. 2OO~9

+44

"IP4 1-owi4,o 14

ot

Siii

II

K)IIf iv

~2.)

~ 2 A

4 r~ 4;~~$~) r</)

~Th( )

{ I ~Dr~Y~

Id ~

4 II 11

*17 ~'

1:21,4 ~- 5. -~ ~vj5,- -Sn

~A ~-4 ~4 5$, 4~21 I , S

'4, -~ -5. -;C 4-is ,~5- 5-~)

5., -'--4

~54-5---

~, ,1~ - S

j >5,

5- -,~,-- --4 4)5

C '-k -~ 'V

5.S 5,

j5.4-S

.5

'5

**'s5' 1

- S. , -,* :,, ,~ >'.

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK SECTION 31 23 00 · PDF fileDIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK SECTION 31 23 00 ... H. ASTM D 3017 Test Method for Moisture Content ... J. ASTM D-1557 Standard Test Methods

Documents