Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Feb 07, 2016
Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning
and Institutional Research
apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
What kinds of Student data do we measure?
• Enrollments• Retention• Graduation• Grades• Majors• High impact practices (study abroad, service
learning project, senior capstone course, etc.)• Comparisons with peer universities
What categories of students do we track?
• Gender• Race and ethnicity • First generation• Low income• Student level (graduate, undergraduate, first year, etc.)• Transfer student• International• Age • Program (PEOPLE, Posse, First-year Interest Group, etc.)
• How many minority students attend UW-Madison?
• How has the number changed over time?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
74 7576 7778 79 80 8182 8384 8586 87 88 8990 9192 93 9495 9697 98 9900 01 0203 0405 06 07 0809 1011 12
RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories
Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Minority Students, 14.5%
Targeted Minority Students, 9.9%
From 2003 to 2012 4.4 percentage
point increase in Minority Enrollment
3.4 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
From 2003 to 2012: Increases in undergraduate
enrollment in all race/ethnic
categories 3.4 percentage
point increase in undergraduate
targeted minority enrollment
International Students: 6.8% of
Undergraduate Enrollment
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7%
1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8%0.5%0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%
2.4%2.6%
2.8%3.1%
3.3% 3.6%3.8% 3.9% 4.3% 4.4%
% o
f Tot
al U
nder
grad
uate
s
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native American
SE Asian
African Ameri-can
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8%
0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0%0.5% 0.4% 0.5%
0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%2.5% 2.5% 2.7%2.8% 2.9% 2.9%
3.2% 3.5% 3.7% 4.0%
% o
f Tot
al G
radu
ate
Stud
ent E
nrol
lmen
t
His-panic/ Latino/a
Native AmericanSE Asian
African American
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
From 2003 to 2012: Increases in
graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories
3.2 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 25.6% of graduate enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3%
0.3% 0.4%0.7% 0.9%
1.3% 1.6%1.6% 1.3% 1.2% 0.7%1.1% 1.0%
0.9%1.1%
1.2%1.3%
1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
4.0% 4.1%3.5%
3.6%
3.7%3.7%
3.4% 3.4% 3.3%2.9%
% o
f Tot
al p
rofe
ssio
nal S
tude
nt E
nrol
lmen
t
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Native Ameri-canSE Asian
African Ameri-can
• From 2003 to 2012: Constant percent
of professional targeted minority enrollment
International Students make up 3.9% of professional student enrollment
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
• How do we compare to other universities?
Iowa State
Iowa State
Indiana
Wisconsin
Penn State
Pittsburgh
Michigan State
Minnesota
Michigan
Virginia
North Carolina
Florida
Washington
Texas
Rutgers
UC-Davis
UC-San Diego
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
N = 2,228N = 1,917N = 2,328N = 4,102N = 4,365N = 3,360N = 4,137N = 3,050N = 5,870N = 6,559N = 2,904N = 4,371N = 6,109N = 3,456N = 6,110
N = 4,053N = 6,473N = 10,125N = 4,108N = 8,745N = 5,366
N = 10,197N = 11,891N = 9,963N = 11,040
N = 6,468N = 16,673N = 8,720N = 13,892
N = 14,089N = 14,160N = 15,024
N = 15,180N = 15,396
Percent of Undergraduates
Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2010
Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 29%
6 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.
10 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.
Peer Enrollments by Minority Status
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010
80%
• What about some other measures of student diversity? –How many low income students and
first generation students are enrolled at UW?
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201202468
1012141618
12 12.510.7 11.4 11.7 11.1
14.116 16.5
13.7
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
• 14.3% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.
• 13.7% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
02468
1012141618
12.6 12.811.6 11.5 12.2 11.7
14.717.0 16.0
14.3
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5
10
15
20
25
8.1
13.317.6
20.8 22.3 22.1 21.8 20.8 • Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.
• Question first asked in 2005.
• 18.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data is preliminary.
All Undergraduates
New Undergraduates
Accumulating Data
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5
10
15
20
25
21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.918.9
• What does the pipeline to UW-Madison look like?–How many low income students
are enrolled in high school in Wisconsin?
–How many students of color?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
(90,991 of 264,206)
(14,504 of 64,687)
No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits
(591 of 3,515)
Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students
Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates
UW-Madison Enrolled
Pipeline: Low Income
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13
• 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2011-12)
• 23% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2010)
• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications
• 17% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Enrolled
UW-Madison Admits
UW-Madison Applicants
"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High
School Graduates
Minority Public High School Graduates
Minority Public High School Students
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
(290,550 of 385,907)
(1,335 of 8441)
(729 of 5,740)
(483 of 3,515)
(753 of 14,943)
(11,568 of 64,687)
(56,519 of 264,206)
Pipeline: Minority
• 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2011-12)
• 18% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2009-10)
• 14% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students (2012)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.
• How many students return for a second year?
• How many graduate within six years?
Retention and Graduation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201070
80
90
100
Perc
ent R
etai
ned
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201040
50
60
70
80
90
100
Year of Cohort Entrance
Perc
ent G
radu
ated
Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years)
Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year)
14 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap
2 percentage point First-YearRetention Rate gap
All Students: 94%
All Students: 83%
Targeted Minority Students: 69%
Targeted Minority Students: 92%
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group
Equity in Educational Outcomes
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation
Rate % Difference
All New Freshmen 93.9 - 82.8 -Women 93.7 -.2 83.4 0.6
Men 94.1 0.2 81.9 -0.9Targeted Minority 91.7 -2.2 68.8 -14.0
Non-Targeted 94.2 0.3 84.1 1.3African American 92.9 -1.0 61.9 -20.9Native American 89.5 -4.4 68.6 -14.2
Hispanic/Latino/a 92.3 -1.6 74.9 -7.9South East Asian 89.9 -4.0 68.4 -14.4
Non-Targeted Asian 95.9 2.0 81.7 -1.1International 88.7 -5.2 70.5 -12.3
Wisconsin Residents 95.0 1.1 83.4 0.6Non-Residents 92.4 -1.5 80.7 -2.1
First-Generation College Students 93.1 -0.8 75.8 -7.0Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid 93.2 -0.7 76.4 -6.4
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 91.7 -2.2 69.7 -13.1FIGs 95.0 1.1 79.1 -3.7
Targeted Minority in FIGs 93.8 -0.1 64.7 -18.1Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort
Ariz
ona
Kans
asSU
NY-
Buffa
loN
ebra
ska
SUN
Y-St
ony
Broo
kCo
lora
doO
rego
nM
isso
uri
Iow
a St
ate
Purd
ueM
inne
sota
Iow
aIn
dian
aRu
tger
sO
hio
Stat
eW
eigh
ted
Aver
age
Pitts
burg
hM
ichi
gan
Stat
eGe
orgi
a Te
chUC
San
ta B
arba
raCa
se W
este
rnTe
xas A
&M
Was
hing
ton
Texa
sUC
Dav
isM
aryl
and
Syra
cuse
UC Ir
vine
Wis
cons
inIll
inoi
sFl
orid
aPe
nn S
tate
Calte
chM
ichi
gan
UCLA
UC B
erke
ley
Vand
erbi
ltM
ITCo
lum
bia
Corn
ell
Virg
inia
Brow
nN
orth
wes
tern
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
Perc
enta
ge P
oint
Gap
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.
• Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts)
• Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
What do we know about our employees?
• Employee counts over time• Recruitment• Retention and turnover• Promotions• Comparisons with peer universities
What groups of employees can we examine?
• Gender• Race and ethnicity• Age• International• Type of position (classified staff, academic
staff, faculty, teaching assistant, etc.)• Tenure status• Work unit
Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff
2012 data available in December 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/ Ad-
min
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff Classified0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
All Employee Groups
- Around 13% of all employees are minorities
- A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Total Faculty Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
Classified0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
Black, 2.2%
Asian, 10.9%
American Indian, 0.5%
Hispanic, 3.5%
Two or More Races, 0.6%
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount
16.8%16.9%16.2%
13.2%13.8%
14.3% 14.6%15.1%
15.4%
17.6%
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation
• In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members
• 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.
• 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
Minority Faculty Non-Asian Minority Faculty
Year of Hire
Perc
ent
Madison Plan
Strategic Hires SHI - 2
Instructional Academic Staff
• In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members
• 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities
• 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
11.7%12.1%
11.2%11.9%11.5%
10.5%9.8%
8.8%8.9%
Black,1.5% (34)
Asian,7.1% (159)
American Indian,.2% (5)
Hispanic/Latino/a,2.6% (57)
11.8%
Two or More Races,.4% (8)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.8% (90)
AmericanIndian, .5% (23)
Asian,8.0% (406)
Black,1.7% (85)
12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%
10.2%9.6%9.4%
12.3%
Two or More Races,.5% (26)
Non-Instructional Academic Staff
• In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff
• 12.3% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities
• 3.7% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified Staff
• In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members
• 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities
• 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount
12.6%12%11.8%11.3%
11%10%
9.1%8.5%8.1%
Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.4% (291)American Indian,.3% (16)
Asian, 4.3% (233)
Black,2.4% (129)
12.9%
Two or More Races, 0.5% (28)
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender
• At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
6 Years 9 Years0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
54%
72%
42%
67%
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsMen Women
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
• At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
6 Years 9 Years0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
50%
71%
48%
66%
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsNon-Minority Minority
72%
81% 79%74%
57%64% 66%
81%
72%
48%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities
Biological Sciences Social Studies
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division
Men Women
N=547
N=279
N=89N=144
N=29
N=93N=190 N=74
N=124
N=83
Promotion to Tenure
• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.
• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• What kind of survey data do we have?– National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
includes many climate-related questions. Fielded in 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011
– Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI) survey of faculty worklife in 2003, 2006, 2010, 2012
– UW System Climate survey of staff and students in CALS in 2011
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
** significantly different
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective
Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments
Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own
Understand people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds
75
63
71
55
66
56
49
56
67
57
52
56AllNon-MinorityMinority
**
**
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm