Top Banner
Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus Membrane Sensors Optical versus Membrane Sensors Thomas Amidon Omni Environmental LLC 8 th Water Monitoring Summit West Trenton, NJ December 2 nd , 2011
12

Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Nov 21, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring:Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring:Optical versus Membrane SensorsOptical versus Membrane Sensors

Thomas Amidon

Omni Environmental LLC

8th Water Monitoring Summit

West Trenton, NJ

December 2nd, 2011

Page 2: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Acknowledgements and Outline

AcknowledgementsJoe “JJ” Schwarz, Omni Field Sampling Manager

Managed all field activities and assembled data

Glen Petrauski, SRVSAClient for whom comparative data were obtained

United States Geological SurveyContinuous water quality data in Raritan River @ Manville

OutlineWhy is it important?

Ways to measure DO

A few interesting comparisons

Conclusions

Page 3: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Why is Diurnal DO Monitoring Important?

DO, pH, temperature, as well as conductivity and

turbidity, are frequently measured in-situ and diurnally in

surface waters

In-situ: measurements performed in the field

Diurnal: measurements performed throughout the day

DO and pH in particular can be used to assess the net

impact of biochemical processes on surface water quality

Photosynthesis

Respiration

Decay (decomposition)

Levels and diurnal swings of DO and pH are useful in

assessing nutrient impacts

Page 4: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Example Diurnal Swing

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.07/4 12 AM

7/4 6 AM

7/4 12 PM

7/4 6 PM

7/5 12 AM

7/5 6 AM

7/5 12 PM

7/5 6 PM

7/6 12 AM

7/6 6 AM

7/6 12 PM

7/6 6 PM

7/7 12 AM

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) or pH (s.u.)

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

Temperature (° Celsius)

pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature

Page 5: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Ways to Measure DO

Winkler Method

Preserve sample in a bottle and titrate later in lab

The oldest tried and true method

Sensor methods

Used in portable meters as well as in-situ meters

2 types of technology

Membrane (aka Clark cell or amperometric method)

Optical (aka luminescent sensor)

Page 6: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Advantages and Disadvantages

Winkler method

Nobody is going to argue with the results

No meter calibration – simplest method by far

Disadvantage – only one sample at a time!

In-situ Sensor Methods

Membrane Sensor

Certified method!

Method has been in use for many years and is accepted

Optical Sensor

No consumbles (membrane and filling solution)

No stirring required and no known interference

Not yet certified for all uses in State of New Jersey

Page 7: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Both Sensors Perform Very Well

Mainstem Raritan River

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

07/27/10 07/29/10 07/31/10 08/02/10 08/04/10 08/06/10 08/08/10 08/10/10

DO (mg/l)

DO (Optical) DO (Membrane) DO Grabs (Optical) DO Grabs (Winkler)

Page 8: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Both Sensors React Similiarly

Millstone River

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

6:00 AM

12:00 PM

6:00 PM

12:00 AM

6:00 AM

12:00 PM

6:00 PM

12:00 AM

6:00 AM

12:00 PM

6:00 PM

12:00 AM

6:00 AM

DO (mg/l)

DO (Optical) DO (Membrane) DO Grabs

Page 9: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Optical DO Sensors Capture Peaks

Mainstem Raritan River

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

06/25/10 06/27/10 06/29/10 07/01/10 07/03/10 07/05/10 07/07/10

DO (mg/l)

DO (Optical) DO (Membrane) DO Grabs (Optical) DO Grabs (Winkler)

Page 10: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Optical Sensor Reproducibility

Raritan River at Manville

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

08/06/10 08/08/10 08/10/10 08/12/10 08/14/10 08/16/10 08/18/10 08/20/10

DO (mg/l)

7

7.5

8

8.5

9

9.5

10

10.5

11

11.5

12

pH (s..u.)

DO (USGS Optical) DO (Omni Optical) DO Grab pH (USGS) pH (Omni) pH Grabs

Page 11: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Conclusions

Both methods can produce excellent in-situ results

If regulatory approval is required, be sure to specify method in quality assurance plan

For diurnal deployment, optical sensor enjoys a few key advantages

Less susceptible to biofouling and other interferences

Better performance in low DO environments

Might capture peaks better under certain conditions

Better performance in low velocity environments

Usually holds calibration longer

Optical sensor must be conditioned prior to deploymentImportant part of meter calibration

Requires overnight (plan ahead!)

Page 12: Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring: Optical versus ...

Questions and Discussion

Thomas Amidon

Senior Associate

Water Resources Manager

609-924-8821 x128

[email protected]

www.Omni-Env.com

Joseph W. Schwarz

Senior Engineer

QA/QC Field Manager

609-924-8821 x119

[email protected]