DISTRACTED DRIVING A Deadly & Costly Epidemic BOB NEWKIRK | CHIEF ADVISOR | APRIL 4, 2019
DISTRACTED DRIVING A Deadly & Costly Epidemic
BOB NEWKIRK | CHIEF ADVISOR | APRIL 4, 2019
DISTRACTED DRIVING
A Deadly & Costly Epidemic
America, and the rest of the world, has a big problem that’s rapidly
growing – distracted driving. Specifically, distraction caused by cell phone
use while driving.
Despite safer vehicles, road fatalities continue to increase
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway
Transportation Administration (NHTSA) declared that distracted driving is
one of the top causes of collisions – Ray LaHood, Transportation Secretary,
described it as a “deadly epidemic”.1
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI) and NHTSA released a study
that stated 80% of crashes and 65% of “near-crashes” involve some form
of driver distraction.3
Distracted driving caused by handheld mobile device use is one of the fastest
growing contributors to fatal collisions and about 70% of drivers report
using cell phones despite knowing phones can be a crash risk according to
the National Safety Council (NSC).6 Crash risks increase 4X when drivers
are distracted by cell phones.5
Several nationwide campaigns and programs such as “Don’t Text & Drive”
(BMW); “It Can Wait” (AT&T); U Drive. U Text. U Pay.” (NHTSA);
“Toward Zero Deaths” (U.S. Transportation Leaders); among others, have
been running the past several years to inform the public about the dangers of
cellphone use while driving. However, simply knowing the risks of
distracted driving has not yet translated into reducing the behavior.7
www.nocell.com
“More than 1.2 million people die each year as a result of road traffic crashes” 2
- The World Health Organization
“Distracted driving is one of the most underreported traffic safety issues” 4
- American Automobile
Association
“Individuals who text message while driving are 23 times more likely to get into an accident” 8
- New York Times
Date Taken: 8/5/2014, by Unknown, COLOURBOX27409333
DISTRACTED DRIVING A Deadly & Costly Epidemic
Soaring risk and cost for distracted driving incidents
Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of work-related death from
injury in the U.S., according to the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH).9 NHTSA reported, “the price tag for crashes
comes at a heavy burden for Americans at $871 billion in economic loss and
societal harm.” 10
Fleet liability, costs and penalties continue to rise
Liability costs continue to rise for fleets across the board. Distracted
driving may tragically result in an injury or fatality for the driver, a
passenger, a bystander, or an occupant of another vehicle. This can result
in significant criminal and civil implications for the driver and company, as
well as negatively affect a hard-earned brand that will be cast in the light of
endangering public safety after a crash.
Employers are often held liable in distracted driving cases because of
a legal doctrine known as “vicarious liability”, which charges employers
with legal responsibility if a negligent act is committed by an
employee acting within the “general scope” of his or her employment.
Correspondingly, many judges and juries are awarding record high,
multimillion-dollar settlements. And, because most major commercial
fleet companies are self-insured, these costs come directly off the company’s
bottom line.
In a 2012 publication, NHTSA and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA) estimated on-the-job crashes cost employers more
than $24,500 property damage per crash. Both organizations found that
the cost rises to $150,000 per injury and to as much as $3.6 million per
fatality.13
www.nocell.com
“Vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death on the job” 11
- National Institute for
Occupational Safety
and Health
“20% of a fleet is involved in a crash annually” 12 - Network of Employers
for Traffic Safety
“Business leaders owe it to their employees to put safety first – especially when employees are on the roads" 14
- National Safety Council
Date Taken: 6/26/2013, by Lev Dolgachov, COLOURBOX10369685
DISTRACTED DRIVING A Deadly & Costly Epidemic
NETS Cost of Motor Vehicle Crashes to Employers Report 15
In 2013, Network for Employers Traffic Safety (NETS) reported, “U.S. traffic
crashes cost employers $47.4 billion in direct crash-related expenses which
include medical care, liability, lost productivity and property damage.”
Total calculated costs to employers of crashes caused by distracted driving
was $8.2 Billion.16
In its survey of costs of collisions in 2015, NETS found for a fatal crash fleet
liability was more than $38,000 on top of the health fringe benefit costs and
other direct costs (including legal costs) of more than $625,000.18
Many of these incidents occur during the workday or during the commute to
and from work. Employers bear the cost for injuries that occur both on and off
the job. Whether you manage a fleet of vehicles, oversee a mobile sales force
or simply employ commuters, by implementing driver safety programs and
technology in the workplace you can greatly reduce the risks faced by your
employees and their families while protecting your company’s bottom line. 19
Government fleets ban texting and cell phone handling
In October 2009, President Obama signed an executive order banning federal
employees from sending texts in government cars. 20 Since 2006, the U.S.
military permits only hands-free use of phones on bases. 21
www.nocell.com
“Distracted driving is a serious concern for employers that operate fleets or whose employees must drive to perform their jobs” 17
- Network of Employers
for Traffic Safety
President Obama signed an executive order that forbids Federal employees and contractors to text while driving when they are using government-provided cars or cell phones and when they are using their own phones or cars to conduct government business. 20 - U.S. DOT
Date Taken: 8/12/2012, by Unknown, COLOURBOX8677289
DISTRACTED DRIVING A Deadly & Costly Epidemic FMCSA penalties for driving a commercial motor vehicle while using a
mobile phone can be up to $2,750 for drivers and $11,000 for employers,
as well as put out of service for up to 120 days. 22
Employers take initial steps beyond legislation to reduce
distracted driving
Some employers have taken steps to reduce distracted driving beyond
current legislation.23 However, a large number of companies don't
enforce employee cell phone policies. 24
In addition, at stake for fleets is the risk of penalties & fees for violating
state laws cracking down on cell phone use while driving. A total of
47 states, in addition to Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands have passed laws forbidding texting while driving. 25
However, current U.S. laws are not strictly enforced. Punishments are
mild so people pay little attention. Drivers are not categorically prohibited
from using phones while driving. For example, using earphones to talk
and texting with a hands-free device remain legal.27
What should companies do?
While a growing number of companies have enacted policies governing
cell phone use while driving, the challenge is this – How do you enforce
these policies, especially if you’re managing fleets consisting of dozens,
or hundreds, or even several thousand vehicles and drivers?
www.nocell.com
“FMCSA prohibits texting by commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers” 22
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
“Even with strong
enforcement, cellphone
and texting bans aren't
reducing crashes reported
to insurers” 26
- The Insurance Institute
for Highway Safety
1. Have a written policy addressing distracted driving.
2. Deploy technology to enforce safe driving policies.
Date Sourced: 7/24/2018, by Unknown, SHUTTERSTOCK 288813485
ABOUT NOCELL
▪ Safe Driving Saves Lives and Money Nocell Technologies benefits organizations through
decreasing vehicle crashes, injuries and fatalities by
minimizing mobile device distractions – mitigating loss.
▪ Driver Safety Policy Enforcement NOCELL provides technology that enables application-level
cell phone use policy enforcement and informs supervisors
of non-compliance.
▪ Enterprise-Grade Platform NOCELL’s driver device management DDM™ platform was
designed for commercial fleets, easily integrates with existing
telematics and fleet management systems, and scales without
delay to multi-thousands of vehicles and drivers.
Date Sourced: 7/24/2018, by Unknown, SHUTTERSTOCK 684756622
RESOURCES 1 “Distracted Driving a Deadly Epidemic”, Tony Scotti (2014, March) “The Kill Zone”, International Security
Driver Association
https://isdacenter.org/distracted-driving-a-deadly-epidemic/
2 “Global status report on road safety”, Road traffic injuries fact sheet, reviewed (2018, Jan), World Health
Organization (WHO).
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs358/en/
3 “Driver Behavior and Crash Factors” (2006, April), Jacqueline Glassman, NHTSA Administrator, Virginia
Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI) news conference, Blacksburg, VA
https://vtnews.vt.edu/articles/2006/04/2006-237.html
4 " Distraction Tops Drivers’ List of Growing Dangers on the Road” (2018, March), Tamra Johnson, Manager
Public Relations, AAA Foundation’s annual Traffic Safety Culture Index
https://newsroom.aaa.com/2018/03/distraction-tops-drivers-list-growing-dangers-road/
5 “Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers”, Klauer, S., Guo, F.,
Simons-Morton, B.G., Ouimet, M.C., Lee, S.E., & Dingus, T.A. (2014, Jan). New England Journal of
Medicine; 370:54-59. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1204142
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1204142
6 “Technologies Can Reduce Cell Phone Distracted Driving”, The National Safety Council (NSC) is a
nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization (Accessed 2018, April).
https://www.nsc.org/road-safety/safety-topics/distracted-driving/technology-solutions
7 “Stuck in the 70s: The role of social norms in distracted driving”, Atchley, P., Hadlock, C., & Lane, S. (2012).
Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 279-284.
https://docplayer.net/77958907-Investigation-and-prosecution-of-distracted-driving-cases.html
8 “In Study, Texting Lifts Crash Risk by Large Margin”, Matt Richtel (2009, July), The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/technology/28texting.html
9 “Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute Status Report”, Vol. 39,
No. 4 (2004, March) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/39/4/4
10 “Economic costs alone are nearly $900 for each person living in the U.S.”, Karen Aldana (2014, May), U.S.
DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
https://gsablogs.gsa.gov/wheelsandwings/2014/05/29/new-nhtsa-study-shows-motor-vehicle-crashes-have-871-
billion-economic-and-societal-impact-on-u-s-citizens/
11 “Motor Vehicle Safety at work”, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Center for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety (updated: 2018, June)
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle/default.html
12“Developing Budget-Friendly Driver Safety Programs”, (2015, April) Amy Hercher, former senior editor with
Bobit Business Media's Auto Group
https://www.businessfleet.com/156025/developing-budget-friendly-driver-safety-programs
13 “NSC White Paper Details Employer Liability From Crashes Caused By Distracted Driving”, (2012, April) Automotive Fleet Staff, National Safety Council (NSC)
https://www.automotive-fleet.com/81263/nsc-white-paper-details-employer-liability-from-crashes-caused-by-
distracted-driving
14 “NSC to Employers: Protect Yourself with a Corporate Cell Phone Policy”, (2012, May) Janet Froetscher,
NSC president and CEO, National Safety Council (NSC)
http://www.ehstoday.com/safety/nsc-employers-protect-yourself-corporate-cell-phone-policy
www.nocell.com
RESOURCES 15 “The Economic Burden of Traffic Crashes on Employers Costs by State and Industry and by Alcohol and
Restraint Use”, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2005,
August) Publication No. DOT HS 809 682
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/increasing-safetybelt-usage-manual.pdf
16 “Cost of Motor Vehicle Crashes to Employers— 2015™” Report prepared for the Network of Employers for
Traffic Safety (NETS) by the Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation, funded by a grant to NETS by the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
http://trafficsafety.org/costofcrashes/index.html
17 “Distracted Driving Serious Concern for Employers”, (2017, December) Network of Employers for Traffic
Safety (NETS) and American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP)
https://trafficsafety.org/nets-news/distracted/
18 “Cost of Motor Vehicle Crashes to Employers— 2015 (NETS)” Network of Employers for Traffic Safety
(Accessed 2018, March).
http://trafficsafety.org/road-safety-resources/public-resources/cost-of-motor-vehicle-crashes-to-employers-2015/
19 “Guidelines for Employers to Reduce Motor Vehicle Crashes” joint document U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), NHTSA, and NETS (2005)
https://www.osha.gov/Publications/motor_vehicle_guide.html
20 “Document 74 FR 51225 Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving”, Executive Office
of the President (2009, October), President Obama, Executive Order 13513
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-10-06/pdf/E9-24203.pdf
21“DoD to Restrict Cell Phone Use on Military Bases” Sgt. Sara Wood, American Forces Press (2006, May)
http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=14689
22 “No Texting Rule Fact Sheet (2012, May), U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration (FMCSA)
https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/driver-safety/distracted-driving/no-texting-rule-fact-sheet
23 “Employers are Leading the Way” (Accessed 2018, March) National Safety Council (NSC).
https://www.nsc.org/road-safety/safety-topics/distracted-driving/employers
24 “Large Number of Companies Don't Enforce Employee Cell Phone Policies” (2011, May), Occupational
Health & Safety
https://ohsonline.com/articles/2011/05/19/survey-large-number-of-companies-dont-enforce-employee-cell-
phone-policies.aspx
25 “Distracted Driving Cellphones and Texting” (2017, July) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/laws/cellphonelaws/maptextingbans
26 “Bans reduce phone use, but what about crashes?” (2014, October) Status Report, Vol. 49, No. 8, Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/49/8/5
27 "State Laws Restricting Driver Use of Mobile Communications Devices: Distracted-Driving Provisions",
Ibrahim, J.K.; Anderson, E. D.; Burris, S. C.; Wagenaar, A. C. (2011). American Journal of Preventive
Medicine.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565659
Disclaimer
This information is provided as a courtesy by Nocell Technologies, LLC to the general public. It is provided “as
is,” without any representations or guarantees as to its accuracy, and neither Nocell Technologies nor any
contributing company is liable for the content or use of this information.
www.nocell.com