Top Banner
One Week, One Course A rapid prototyping concept for online course development Scott Schopieray College of Arts and Letters Michigan State University
37
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Disted12

One Week, One Course

A rapid prototyping concept for online course development

Scott SchopierayCollege of Arts and LettersMichigan State University

Page 2: Disted12

What is OWOC?

• Brings Faculty, staff and students together for an intensive week of focused work on one course

• Opportunity to break course development down into core components

Page 3: Disted12

History of the project

Some rights reserved by derrickting

Page 4: Disted12

Initial Pilot Opportunities

• May/June 2010 – Integrated Arts/Humanities course – 50% blend

• March/April 2011 – Special topics course on German Fairy Tales – Fully Online

Both courses ATT Award winnershttp://attawards.msu.edu/

Page 5: Disted12

About OWOC

• Faculty must teach course afterward

• Faculty were given a small stipend for participation

• College/vuDAT provided resources, personnel, and lunch

• Continued support provided afterward

Page 6: Disted12

What is a Sprint?

Some rights reserved by Uninen

Page 7: Disted12

Why do sprints seem to work?

Traditional Sprint OWOC Sprint

A coach directs: suggesting tasks, tracking progress and ensuring that

no one is stuckAcademic Technology Director

Most work happens in pairs. Partners with complementary skills. Faculty paired with an eProducer

A large open space is often chosen as a venue for efficient

communication.

We used a common space (Creativity Exploratory) for everyone

to use

Project members meet in person, socialize, and start to communicate more effectively than when working

together remotely or asynchronously

Forge a relationship that carries over into remaining development

Page 8: Disted12

Timeline

• Faculty commitment (-3-5 weeks)• Pre-Meeting 1 (-2 weeks)• Pre-Meeting 2 (-1 week)• Sprint week

Page 9: Disted12

Where did we start?

• 2 Blended courses• 2 FTF courses• 1 Course idea

• 4 Faculty Members, 1 Graduate Student, 1 Visiting Faculty – 6 tech staff

Page 10: Disted12

Pre-Sprint Activities

Page 11: Disted12

Binding Contractual Commitments

• Instructors / SMEs• Project manager / General

contractor• Production Sub-contracts• Instructional Designers• Vendors / Partners

Some rights reserved by NobMouse

Page 12: Disted12

Initial Project Plan & Timeline

• Milestones for pre-sprint activities• Sprint scheduling• Time allowance for

post-sprint• Timeline for course launch• Rough-out evaluation/improvement

Some rights reserved by Cerebro Flickr

Page 13: Disted12

Big-Picture Course Design

• Lay out vision for course• Teaching style• Delivery strategy• Basic Assessment plan

Some rights reserved by London Permaculture

Page 14: Disted12

Learning Objectives

• Pre-requisite knowledge/skills• Demonstrable Knowledge• Expected

performance

Some rights reserved by Miss Lazy

Page 15: Disted12

Preparation of Lectures/Activities

• Slides / narrative / images / diagrams• Examples and activities• Outlines and storyboards• Complete initial drafts• Identify tools/resources

Page 16: Disted12

Search & Review Potential Readings

• Includes any potential readings/resources• Open Courseware• Publisher E-content & Learning Environs• Books / Articles• Library Materials• Museum Collections• Etc

Page 17: Disted12

One Week - Sprint Period

Page 18: Disted12

Facilities – Creativity Exploratory

http://ce.cal.msu.edu/

Page 19: Disted12

Production of Courseware & Lectures

• Lecture Recording• Lecture Capture• Drafting and Copywriting• Assembly of main

components• Configuration of E-learning platform• Drafting and Copywriting• Instructional Presence & Narrative

Some rights reserved by Pip R. Lagenta

Page 20: Disted12

Selection of Readings & Resources

• Final selection of assigned readings list

• Beginning of copyright clearance process

• Integration of licensed content with homegrown

• Deployment of materials in E-learning system

Some rights reserved by pindec

Page 21: Disted12

Revised Project Plan

• What's left to do?• Takeaway assignments for

SME• Distribution of tasks to

sub-contractors• Agreement on final approval process• Commitment to milestones

Page 22: Disted12

Typical Day

• 9am - Convene/Work Plan• 9:30am-Noon - Work with support• 12:00-1:30 - Lunch with guest• 1:30-3:00 - Continue work• After hours is “homework” time

* Note: We often stopped to share, ask questions, etc.

Page 23: Disted12

Post-Sprint / Pre-Offering Period

Page 24: Disted12

Complete Writing & Editing to obtain Final Copy

• Instructional design • Final writing by SME• Proofing & editing• Copywriting final E-text & narrative• Prep of pre-scripted communications

Some rights reserved by NotoriousJEN

Page 25: Disted12

Set Final Delivery Schedule

• In-line with marketing plan• Takes into account overall

production timeline

Page 26: Disted12

Copyright Clearance / Licensing

• 3rd Party materials• Selection of Open-Licensed

Alternatives• Licensing via Board of

Trustees/Administrators• University Author clearance• Etc.

Page 27: Disted12

Final Accessibility Review

• Final check against ADA/508 standards• Alternative assignments/materials• Final technical remediation

Page 28: Disted12

Post-Offering Period

Page 29: Disted12

Course Evaluation

• e.g. Quality Matters• Curricular Review (by faculty - dept)• Student Feedback• Learning Outcomes

Page 30: Disted12

Continuous Improvement/Revision

• Incremental Changes by Instructor or ID• Repeat Process• What is shelf-life of course?

Page 31: Disted12

Outcomes

• 2 web applications (timeline and gallery)http://widgets.cal.msu.edu/

• Focused work on 5 courses (range from beginning to finished)

• Collaboration among faculty and staff• Discussion about issues and tools for

online learning

Page 32: Disted12

Why Use this Method?

• Faculty typically don't have a lot of time during the school year to focus on new development

• It's difficult to train new instructional designers during the school year

• Hands-on technology workshops typically get low turnout during the school year

Page 33: Disted12

Lessons Learned

• Some preference for more of a workshop-style offering rather than work time

• Lunch was a hit – then days went longer

• Change format

• 2-3 Tech staff – collaboration key

• Create contracts and sign them!

Page 34: Disted12

Faculty Feedback (n=6)

• Overall Experience - mean 4.8/5

• Would you participate again? – mean 4.6/5

• Do you feel you were successful in reaching your goals? – mean 4.5/5

Page 35: Disted12

Faculty Feedback

• “I would do this again in a heartbeat. If fit my learning style very well and I was provided a lovely lunch every day and I got paid for my time. Excellent!”

• “Thank you so much to the IT staff that was available, patient, effective listeners, exciting brainstormers, and enjoyable to work with. Great job!”

Page 36: Disted12

Implementing at your institution

• Download the facilitator packet at:http://owoc.cal.msu.edu/

• Plan well ahead – recruit interested faculty• Meet with technology staff/other support

staff ahead of time, explain process• Provide incentives – lunch, funding, tech

toys, etc.

Page 37: Disted12

Questions?

Presentation at http://owoc.cal.msu.edu/

[email protected]