Mar 31, 2015
Discovery Grants ProgramandResearch Tools and Instruments Grants Program
“Delivering on NSERC’s commitment to excellence”
PART IDiscovery Grants Program
4
The Discovery Grants Program
Excellence of the Discovery Grants Program validated in two major independent reviews (2008)
Strong support for existing program criteria to measure excellence
Recommendations for enhancement:– New rating principles and measures to allow the
peer review system to respond more dynamically to applicants’ performance (as of 2009)
– New committee structure to give all applicants a higher quality, more comprehensive review (as of 2010)
5
Eligibility to Apply
To be eligible, you must: hold, or have a firm offer of, an academic appointment at a
Canadian institution (minimum three-year term position) as of September 1, 2011;
be in a position that requires independent research and allows supervision of highly qualified personnel (HQP); and
spend a minimum of six months per year at an eligible Canadian institution (if holding a position outside Canada).
Requirements can be found on NSERC’s Web site.
6
Eligibility of Subject Matter Discovery Grants support:
– research programs in the natural sciences and engineering (NSE); and
– interdisciplinary research that is predominantly in the NSESignificance, impact, advancement of knowledge or practical applications in NSE.
The following eligibility guidelines can be found on NSERC’s Web site:– Selecting the Appropriate Federal Granting Agency – Preparation and Review of Applications in Interdisciplinary Rese
arch Consult NSERC or your research grants office (RGO).
Applications deemed more appropriate for another agency will be rejected.
7
Evaluation Process Overview Two-step process separates merit assessment from
funding recommendations. Merit assessment uses six-point scale to evaluate:
– Excellence of the researcher;– Merit of the proposal; and– Contributions to the training of HQP.
Applications grouped in “bins” of comparable merit. Funding recommendations: similar overall ratings within
an Evaluation Group (EG) receive comparable funding, with possible modulation related to the cost of research.
Greater consistency in process between EGs and between competition years.
8
Two-Step Review Process
Exc
eptio
nal
Out
stan
ding
Ver
y S
tron
g
Str
ong
Mod
erat
e
Insu
ffic
ient
Fund
ing
"Bin
s"
A (L, N, H) B (L, N, H)
C (L. N. H) D (L, N, H).
.
.
N O P
Exc
eptio
nal
Out
stan
ding
Ver
y S
tron
g
Str
ong
Mod
erat
e
Insu
ffic
ient
Fund
ing
"Bin
s"
Excellence of researcher
Merit of proposal
Contribution to training of HQP
Cost of research High Normal Low
Exc
eptio
nal
Out
stan
ding
Ver
y S
tron
g
Str
ong
Mod
erat
e
Insu
ffic
ient
Fund
ing
"Bin
s"
A (L, N, H) B (L, N, H)
C (L. N. H) D (L, N, H).
.
.
N O P
Exc
eptio
nal
Out
stan
ding
Ver
y S
tron
g
Str
ong
Mod
erat
e
Insu
ffic
ient
Fund
ing
"Bin
s"
Excellence of researcher
Merit of proposal
Contribution to training of HQP
Cost of research High Normal Low
Merit assessmentFunding
recommendation
9
The Conference Model
The 28 former Grant Selection Committees (GSCs) were replaced by 12 EGs in 2010.
Similar to a scientific conference, several sessions occur in parallel streams.
Members are assigned to various sections on the basis of the match between members’ expertise and the subject matter.– Members may participate in reviews in several EGs.
Flexibility allows applications at the interface between EGs to be reviewed by a combination of members with pertinent expertise from relevant groups.
10
Evaluation Groups Genes, Cells and Molecules (1501) Biological Systems and Functions (1502) Evolution and Ecology (1503) Chemistry (1504) Physics (1505) Geosciences (1506) Computer Science (1507) Mathematics and Statistics (1508) Civil, Industrial and Systems Engineering (1509) Electrical and Computer Engineering (1510) Materials and Chemical Engineering (1511) Mechanical Engineering (1512)
11
How Does the Conference Model Work?
EVALUATION GROUP A Group Chair
~ 40 members4 Section Chairs
EVALUATION GROUP BGroup Chair
~35 members4 Section Chairs
EVALUATION GROUP CGroup Chair
~25 members3 Section Chairs
Sec
tion
A1-
2R
esea
rch
Top
ics
A2
and
A4
Sec
tion
A2
Res
earc
h T
opic
A3
Sec
tion
A1-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ic A
1
Sec
tion
A3-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ic A
5S
ectio
n A
3-2
Res
earc
h T
opic
A6
Sec
tion
A4-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ics
A7
and
A8
Sec
tion
A4-
2R
esea
rch
Top
ics
A9
and
B5
Sec
tion
B1-
2R
esea
rch
Top
ics
B2
and
A10
Sec
tion
B1-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ic B
1
Sec
tion
B2
Res
earc
h T
opic
B3
Sec
tion
B3-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ic B
4S
ectio
n B
3-2
Res
earc
h T
opic
s B
1 an
d B
5
Sec
tion
B4-
2R
esea
rch
Top
ics
B7
and
C6
Sec
tion
B4-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ics
B2
and
B6
Sec
tion
C1-
2R
esea
rch
Top
ic C
2S
ectio
n C
1-1
Res
earc
h T
opic
s C
1 an
d B
5
Sec
tion
C2
Res
earc
h T
opic
C3
Sec
tion
C3-
1R
esea
rch
Top
ic C
4S
ectio
n C
3-2
Res
earc
h T
opic
s C
5 an
d A
5
12
Advantages of the Conference Model
Provides a system with the flexibility to:– ensure that applications have the best possible review;– react to the emergence of new research areas; and– enable "traditional" disciplines or well-defined areas to remain
together.
Reviews benefit from a larger pool of expertise than previously existed in the former system.
Applying to the Discovery Grants Program
14
Life Cycle of a Discovery Grant Application
August 1Submission of Form 180
September to OctoberInitial assignment to EG and contacting of referees
November 1Submission of grant application
Mid-NovemberApplications sent out to referees
Early DecemberEvaluation Group members receive applications
FebruaryGrants competition
March to AprilAnnouncement of results
15
Notification of Intent to Apply for a Discovery Grant (Form 180) – Why?
It is used to identify:
the most appropriate EG to review the application;
the need and potential benefits of a joint review between
EGs; and
the external referees for the application.
16
Notification of Intent to Apply for aDiscovery Grant (Form 180) – When and What? Deadline: August 1
– Electronic submission only– Possible adverse consequences if not submitted: difficulty to
secure external referee reports; difficulty to identify need for participation of experts from other EGs
Includes:– Form 180, listing up to five research topics in priority order– List of contributions in the last six years– List of co-applicants and their contributions (for team grants)
17
Submitting a Discovery Grant ApplicationA full Discovery Grant application includes:
an Application for a Grant (Form 101), with supporting documentation;*
a Personal Data Form (Form 100) for the applicant and all co-applicants;
samples of research contributions (e.g., reprints, pre-prints, thesis chapters, manuscripts, patents, technical reports, etc.); and
all required appendices.* Note that applications, including samples of research contributions, are to be submitted electronically.
Evaluation of Discovery Grant Applications
19
Evaluation Criteria
Scientific or engineering excellence of the researcher(s)
Merit of the proposal
Contribution to the training of HQP
20
Scientific or Engineering Excellence of the Researcher(s)
Knowledge, expertise and experience
Contributions to research in the NSE
Importance of contributions
Complementarity of expertise and synergy (for team applications)
21
Merit of the Proposal
Originality and innovation Significance and expected contributions
to research, and potential for technological impact Clarity and scope of objectives Clarity and appropriateness of methodology Feasibility Extent to which the proposal addresses all relevant
issues Appropriateness and justification of the budget Relationship to other sources of funding
22
Contributions to the Training of Highly Qualified Personnel Quality and impact of contributions to training during the
last six years
Proposed plan for future training of HQP in the NSE– Describe the nature of the training (e.g., length, specific projects) in
which HQP will be involved, the HQP’s contributions and pertinence to the research program proposed.
– Applicants should discuss the soundness of their plans and the expected outcomes.
Enhancement of training arising from a collaborative or interdisciplinary environment (where applicable)
Read the Policy and Guidelines on the Assessment of Contributions to Research and Training.
23
Relative Cost of Research
Determined by the reviewers as Low, Normal or High as compared to the norm for the research areas represented in the applications considered by the EG(s).
Factors considered include: – salaries and benefits;– equipment and/or facilities;– materials and supplies;– travel; and– dissemination.
24
Discovery Grants Indicators
25
Grant Proposal: Tips
Write summary in plain language.
Provide a progress report on related research.
Position the research within the field and state-of-the-art.
Clearly articulate short- and long-term objectives.
Provide a detailed methodology.
Form 101
26
Grant Proposal: Tips
Clearly define your role in any collaborative research and planned joint HQP training.
Describe plans for quality HQP training.
Present a realistic budget.
Discuss relationships to other research support.
Consider comments/recommendations you may have received in the last Messages to Applicant.
Form 101
27
Personal Data Form: Tips
List all sources of support.
Describe up to five most significant research contributions.
List all other research contributions.
Explain your role in collaborative research activities.
Describe contributions to HQP training.
Describe nature of HQP studies (master’s and undergraduate).
Form 100
28
Personal Data Form: Tips
Include as much information as possible.
List your student’s names in bold font in the list of contributions.
Explain your role in co-supervision activities.
Give other evidence of impact of work.
Explain any delays in research activity or particular circumstances that might have affected productivity or contributions to HQP training.
Form 100
PART IIResearch Tools and Instruments (RTI) Grants Program
30
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Category 1 RTI Grants foster and enhance the discovery, innovation
and training capability of university researchers in the NSE by supporting the purchase of research equipment and installations.
One-year awards that assist buying or developing research equipment that costs more than $7,000, up to $150,000.
NSERC will accept applications for equipment whose total net cost is up to $250,000, provided that funding from other sources is secured by the applicant to bring the amount requested from NSERC to $150,000 or less.
Consult the RTI Grants Program description on NSERC’s Web site.
31
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Eligibility and Requirements Eligibility requirements to apply to NSERC must be
satisfied (see slide 5).
Only applications from applicants and co-applicants who currently hold, or are applying for, an NSERC research grant (e.g., Discovery Grant, Strategic Project Grant, research partnership, Canada Research Chair) at the time of application are accepted.
If a cash contribution toward the purchase of the equipment is provided by an organization other than the applicant's institution, a letter is required from the organization confirming this commitment.
32
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Submitting an Application
No Notification of Intent to Apply Application to be submitted by October 25 RTI Grant application includes:
- an Application for a Grant (Form 101) with supporting documentation;*
- a Personal Data Form (Form 100) for the applicant and all co-applicants; and
- all required appendices.
* Note that applications are to be submitted electronically.
33
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Selection Criteria
Excellence of the applicant(s)
Merit of the proposed research program(s)
Need and urgency for the equipment—including availability of, and access to, similar equipment
Suitability of the proposed equipment for the proposed research program(s)
Importance of the equipment for the training of HQP
34
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Evaluation Process Applications are rated and ranked.
Based on the available funds, the most meritorious applications are supported down to a cutoff line.
RTI Grants are usually awarded for the full cost of the requested items (including tax, transportation and eligible installation costs).
EGs may recommend partial funding, but the amount recommended must be sufficient to allow for the purchase of a functional unit.
35
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Program – Eligible Costs
Type of Expenditure RTI – Category 1
Salaries and Benefits Not eligible
Equipment or Facility Purchase or rental
Travel Not eligible
Others (transportation costs for purchased equipment, extended warranty, brokerage and customs charges for the importation of equipment and supplies)
Eligible
36
Research Tools and Instruments Grants Applications – Tips
Describe the research program(s) that will be carried out using the equipment.
Explain the need and urgency of the equipment.
Justify the need and appropriateness for each item.
Illustrate the suitability of the proposed equipment for the research program(s).
Discuss the importance of the equipment for the training of HQP—quality and opportunities for hands-on training.
Final Advice
38
Discovery Grant or Research Tools and Instruments Grant Applications – Reminders
Consult the Peer Review Manual, Section 6 (DG) or Section 7 (RTI).
Read all instructions carefully and follow presentation standards.– Use all the space allotted to you, with clear headings and good
layout.– Respect guidelines for font size, margins and page limits.– Identify students’ contributions in bold font.
39
Discovery Grant or Research Tools and Instruments Grant Applications – Reminders Ensure completeness of application. Keep in mind that two audiences read your application
—expert and non-expert. Ask colleagues and/or your RGO for comments on your
application. Read other successful proposals.
40
NSERC Contacts
EGs Program Officer [email protected]
Deadlines, acknowledgement of applications and results
Your university RGO
Your account, Grants in Aid of Research Statement of Account (Form 300)
Your university Business Officer (BO)
NSERC Web site www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca
Discovery Grants Program
(including eligibility)
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel.: 613-995-5829
Use of Grant Funds E-mail: [email protected]
On-line Services Helpdesk E-mail: [email protected]