Top Banner
Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management Available at: www.interdisciplinaryscience.net http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/ir28/IDR/Rafols2011-Rankin gs&IDR.pdf Ismael Rafols 1 , Loet Leydesdorff 2 , Alice O’Hare 1 , Paul Nightingale 1 and Andy Stirling 1 1 SPRU —Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex,
26

Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Disciplinary Diversity of Units

These slides expand the article

How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research:A comparison between innovation studies and business & management

Available at: www.interdisciplinaryscience.net

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/ir28/IDR/Rafols2011-Rankings&IDR.pdf

Ismael Rafols1, Loet Leydesdorff2, Alice O’Hare1, Paul Nightingale1 and Andy Stirling1

1 SPRU —Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, [email protected] 2 Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, [email protected]

Page 2: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Edinburgh ISSTI

Sussex SPRU

Manchest MIoIR

Imperial College Business School

Warwick Business School

London Business School

# of Publications 129 155 115 244 450 348SC of Publications Variety 28 20 19 15 20 9Balance 0.89 0.83 0.82 0.74 0.74 0.72Disparity 0.832 0.839 0.817 0.788 0.770 0.768 Shannon Entropy 3.558 3.243 2.966 2.970 3.078 2.343Rao-Stirling Diversity 0.810 0.783 0.726 0.720 0.680 0.603# of References 6413 7545 5515 11633 21342 16713SC of References Variety 28 18 17 17 20 15Balance 0.82 0.71 0.70 0.65 0.62 0.57Disparity 0.829 0.842 0.846 0.832 0.780 0.825 Shannon Entropy 4.115 3.575 3.378 3.251 3.153 2.802Rao-Stirling Diversity 0.833 0.791 0.729 0.731 0.689 0.682# of Cites 316 767 419 1229 1246 1593SC of Cites Variety 32 21 22 20 24 15Balance 0.90 0.78 0.78 0.73 0.73 0.65Disparity 0.852 0.844 0.836 0.819 0.801 0.767 Shannon Entropy 4.222 3.723 3.415 3.482 3.503 2.985Rao-Stirling Diversity 0.851 0.810 0.771 0.755 0.736 0.679

Page 3: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Edinburgh ISSTI Sussex SPRU Manchester IoIR Imperial College Business School

Warwick Business School

London Business School

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

Rao-Stirling Diversity

Disciplines of Publications

Disciplines of References

Disciplines of Cites

Page 4: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Cognitive Sci.

Agri Sci

Biomed Sci

Chemistry

Physics

Engineering

Env Sci & Tech

Matls Sci

Infectious Diseases

Psychology

Social Studies

Clinical Med

Computer Sci.

Business & MGT

GeosciencesEcol Sci

Econ. Polit. & Geography

Health & Social Issues

Global Map of Science, SCI-SSCI 2007Disciplinary-based (ISI Subject Categories)Rafols, Porter and Leydesdorff (2010)

Global map of science

Page 5: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Subject Category of unit's publications

Proportion of publications per Subject Category

Page 6: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Edinburgh ISSTISubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 7: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Sussex SPRUSubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 8: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Manchester MIoIRSubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 9: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Imperial Business SchoolSubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 10: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Warwick Business SchoolSubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 11: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

London Business SchoolSubject Categories of publications

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 12: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Subject Category of unit's references

Proportion of references per Subject Category

Page 13: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Note: Publications and Cites were assigned to ISI Subject Categories (SC, subdisciplines) using directly the field provided in the records of the Web of Science (WoS). Hence 100% of Publications and Cites can be assigned to SCs.

However, WoS does not provide the SC of references. The assignation of references to SCs was made using the list of journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) in 2009. Since many references are to journals not in the JCR, books and reports, only a subset of the references of each organisation could be assigned.

ISSTI SPRU MIoIR Imperial WBS LBS

Total references 6413 7545 5515 11633 21342 16713

% of references assigned SC 27% 32% 28% 52% 38% 62%

SC / Journal 1.85 2.06 2.18 1.93 2.05 1.65Total counts of SCs of references 3212 4964 3390 11603 16457 17110

Page 14: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Edinburgh ISSTISubject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 15: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Sussex SPRUSubject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 16: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Manchester MIoIR Subject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 17: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Imperial Business SchoolSubject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 18: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Warwick Business School Subject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 19: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

London Business School Subject Categories of references Nodes labelled if >1% publications

Page 20: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Subject Categories of unit's cites

Proportion of cites per discipline

•Dataset excludes any publications from own unit• Still includes duplicates - if one paper is citing various of the unit's publications

than it is counted numerous times

Page 21: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Edinburgh ISSTISubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 22: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Sussex SPRUSubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 23: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Manchester MIoIRSubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 24: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Imperial College Business SchoolSubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 25: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

Warwick Business SchoolSubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications

Page 26: Disciplinary Diversity of Units These slides expand the article How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation.

London Business SchoolSubject Categories of citations

Nodes labelled if >0.5% publications