Disaster Recovery Double Take Customer

1

Windows Disaster Recovery (DR)with Replication using Double-Take Availability

2

Protecting data is important, but cost and complexity prevent small companies & departments from doing it

Backup is very important, but it alone cannot provide for a rapid failover or recovery from a disaster

• Replication provides superior RTOs & RPOs.

Host-based DR for Windows servers can be both easy and affordable, also applicable to virtual servers

Double-Take is recognized as the market leader in host based replication and recovery for 16+ years

Solution Overview

3

When do SMBs start to consider DR and Replication?

When application recovery in the event of a disaster must happen quickly, <1hr vs. several hours

• Does not replace backup, augments data protection

RTO & RPO – Time and Point objectives for recovery

• Synchronous vs. Asynchronous – Depends on Latency

When should shared storage be considered as part of a DR project?

Disaster Recovery for SMBs

4

Smaller companies (SMBs) or departments within larger companies have historically been road-blocked from these features & capabilities

Comparing approaches to Replication for DR

Host-BasedReplication SAN Appliance Disk-to-disk

Replication

Recovery Point Near real-time Near real-time- real time

Near real-time- real time

Recovery Time <1hr - ~10min <1hr – instantly <30min - instantly

Scalability Good Very Good Very Good

Management Per server Centralized Per array

Entry Cost $ $$ - $$$ $$$ - $$$$

5

Basic Architecture – What You Will Need At least two servers for failover, one server for management

Two or more SAN storage devices (Fibre Channel* or iSCSI)

Shared Network (* = plus FC fabric and FCIP extension if FC storage)

Replication capabilities on servers or storage

6

Top 5 criteria in addition to being SAN storage

• Cost Effective

• Protected & Reliable

• Easy Upgrades and Management

• Reasonable Performance

• NOT burdened with additional features that applications, operating systems, and server virtualization provides

iSCSI + Host-Based Replication is a good technology match for these criteria

Requirements For SMB Replication

7

What are the concerns

• Bandwidth & Latency of WAN

• Hardware-dependent failover

Addressing Those Concerns

• Real-time replication that is optimized for WAN‣ Replicates with compression & bandwidth limiting optimization

• Across Hardware and Virtualization‣ Failover across subnets, support for dissimilar hardware and

storage, between physical or virtual systems in either direction

• Value of Host-based with Double-Take Availability

‣ 3 Levels of Compression, byte level differences only, real-time or scheduled/throttled, full-server or data-only

Leveraging Replication Features for DR

8

How Host-Based Real-Time Replication Works

9

Putting It Together – DR with 16TB of SAN

10

Top Questions

• For small environment (5 VMs & <100 users), how much Bandwidth?

• What is a practical distance for small environment DR (Latency)?

Solution Key Takeaways

• Protecting data is important, but cost and complexity prevent small companies and departments from doing it for most data.

• Backup alone cannot provide for a rapid failover or recovery from a disaster; replication provides superior RTOs & RPOs.

• DR for Windows servers (incl VMs) can be done both easily & affordably with DroboElite and Double-Take Availability.

Top Questions & Key Takeaways

11

Questions?Feedback & comments also welcome @[email protected], or on Twitter @ Drobo

More DroboElite solutions @ http://www.drobo.tv

12

Example – Full Server Protection & Failover Hardware and Application independent

• Physical or Virtual

Target requires only a base Operating System

13

Example – Data Protection and Failover Only replicates application data

• Less data across the wire

Faster failover possible