Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL III COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Some achievements 2000- 2006 June, 2006
Apr 17, 2015
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
PORTUGAL
III COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK
Some achievements
2000-2006
June, 2006
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
+ 63.976+18,7 %
NUT II
0 50km341.404
237.795
253.426
405.380
243.007
240.024
3.472.7153.711.797+ 239.082
+6,9 %
2.258.7682.366.691+ 107.923
+4,8 %
2.520.7082.740.237+ 219.529
+8,7 %
782.331767.549- 14.782-1,9 %
- 10.419- 4,1 %
+ 2.229+ 0,9 %
1991: 9.867.147 inh.
2003: 10.474.685 inh.
1991 2003:+ 607.538 inh+ 6,2 %
PORTUGAL
POPULATION 1991 and 2003
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
2003: 113,9 inh./km2
PORTUGAL
inhabitants per km2
Increase from 1990
Decrease from 1990
Population Density 2003
103,4103,4
NUT II
174,4174,4
84,084,0
956,6956,6
24,424,4
81,281,2
293,5293,5
0 50km
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
Urban CentresThe population is concentrated on the littoral
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
PORTUGAL
0 50km
PORTUGAL
16.3
44.5
12.911.1
8.86.4
14.3
35.1
12.610.9
15.7
11.5W
ithou
t
1st
cycl
e
2d c
ycle
3th
cycl
e
Sec
onda
ry
Méd
ium
su
perio
r
% of population for education level
1991 2001
EDUCATION Level - PORTUGAL
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
8.322
13.365
NUT II
0 50km
9.479
13.017
9.087
13.343
16.004
23.665
9.465
14.084
11.184
17.170
10.613
18.968
GDP per INHABITANT- Regional Distribution
PORTUGAL
1995: 11.138 €2002: 16.248 €
GDP in Euros per inhabitant (pps)
1995 2002
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
GVA per SECTORS of ACTIVITY 2001
PORTUGAL
%
3,7
27,9
68,4
Primary
SecondaryTertiary
GVA - % per sectors of activity
3,1
37,1
59,8
5,5
35,059,5
0,6
20,2
79,2
15,0
27,557,5
8,6
16,9
74,5
2,9
20,3
76,9
8,1
14,1
77,9
0 50km
NUT II
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
EMPlOYMENT per SECTORS of ACTIVITY 2003
0 50km
1.793,8
1.289,9
1.289,5
339,2
191,2
102,1 112,3
12,4
41,8
45,7
24,1
31,3
44,6
1,4
24,1
74,614,4
25,959,6
9,2
21,5
69,3
12,8
28,259,0
9,5
26,663,8
NUT II
PORTUGALTotal Employment (thousand)= 5,118
%
Secondary
Primary12,5
32,355,2
Tertiary
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
PORTUGAL
2003: 6,3 %
% of unemployed population
6,86,8
3,63,6
8,18,1
8,28,2
6,16,12,92,9
3,43,4
0 50km
Unemployment rate 2003
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
The European Union Treatry intitutes the economic
and social cohesion principle, whish aims to ensure
an harmonious development of the European Space
by reducing inequalities between different areas and
the underdevelopment of the poorer ones.
THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
Since its accession to E.C., in January 1986, Portugal
has applied, just like the other country members, to
this co-financing instrument which, together with
national and private investments, has become a
decisive support to several development actions that
otherwise would never have been possible.
Previous Regulations – 1986-1988
Community Support Framework I – 1989-1993
Community Support Framework II – 1994-1999
Community Support Framework III – 2000-2006
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
CSF I CSF II CSF III
5.7215.7215.7215.721
14.58914.58914.58914.589
20.52820.52820.52820.528
(Millions of Euros)(Millions of Euros)
Structural Funds
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
European Regional Development Fund
European Social Fund
European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund-Guidance
Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
In order to achieve those goals, 4 structural funds have been created:
E R D F
E S F
E A G G P
F I F G
These are co-financing instruments to which member countries can apply
in order to assist, over multi-annual periods, all national efforts towards
the development and full achievement of the desired cohesion.
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
20 years after Portuguese EU adhesion.
50 billion Euros from Cohesion Policy have been used.
Remarkable achievements have been implemented.
Nevertheless, persistent structural problems affect our economy, our society and our territory.
These persistent structural difficulties occur in the central themes of present growth and employment paradigm.
That have territorially differentiated natures and intensities.
Cohesion Policy in Portugal
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
Remarkable Achievements:
PORTUGAL
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
199
0
199
1
199
2
199
3
199
4
199
5
199
6
199
7
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
LENGH OF MOTORWAY NETWORK
PORTUGAL
0
5
10
15
20
25
19
80
19
90
19
95
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
INFANT MORTALITY
15
25
35
45
55
65
1985
1990
1995
2000
PORTUGAL
SECONDARY ENROLMENT
PORTUGAL
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
19
80
19
90
19
95
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
LIFE EXPECTANCY AT BIRTH
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
GDP pc PPS - EU15=100
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
19
85
19
88
19
91
19
94
19
97
20
00
20
03
19
90
19
86
19
87
19
89
19
92
19
93
19
95
19
96
19
98
19
99
20
01
20
02
20
04
PORTUGAL
IRELAND
SPAIN
GREECE
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
EU15
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
PORTUGAL
R&D INVESTMENT - %GDP
PORTUGAL
EU15
0
0,4
0,8
1,2
1,6
2,0
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
GDP per HOUR WORKED - Annual Increase Rate
LONG -TERM UNEMPLOYMENT
EU15
PORTUGAL
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
Persistent Structural Problems:
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
National Cohesion Policy is not the only responsible for successes neither for insufficiencies:
> Globalisation developments
> Trade agreements
> Unfavourable EU policies
> National public policy formulation and implementation quality
> Governance efficiency and effectiveness
> …
Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional
But, in what regards National Cohesion Policy, explanations include:
> Identification of policy priorities
> Dispersion of Operational Programs
> Insufficient selectivity of investments
> Average dimension of interventions
> Effectiveness of interventions on human resources and economic activities
> Governance efficiency
> …