Top Banner

of 35

DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

Apr 04, 2018

Download

Documents

lauradipasquale
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    1/35

    H A W T H O R N E H A L LI N T E G R A T E D P R O J E C T D O S S I E R

    U n i v e r s i t y o f P e n n s y l v a n i a H S P V 6 0 1 R e c o r d i n g & S i t e A n a l y s i s

    Laura Di Pasquale Vanessa dela Torre Rachel Hildebrandt Sarah Peterson Courtney Willaims

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    2/35

    TA BLE O F C O N TEN TS

    I N T R O D U C T I O N

    E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    G r o u p B i o g r a p h i e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    H I S T O R Y & S I G N I F I C A N C E

    S t a t e m e n t o f S i g n i f i c a n c e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    T h e B l o c k : T h e n & N o w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    H i s t o r i c M a p s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    S i t e C h r o n o l o g y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    E p h e m e r a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    L O C A T I O N

    C u r r e n t M a p s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    R o o f t o p V i e w s o f S u r r o u n d i n g A r e a s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    B U I L D I N G D E S C R I P TI O N

    D e s c r i p t i v e A n a l y s i s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    I N T E R I O R P H O T O G R A P H S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D I A G R A M S

    P o i n t o f E n t r y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    A r c h i t e c t u r a l A r c h a e o l o g y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    C o m p a r i s o n o f C C o m p o n e n t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    B l o c k P a t t e r n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    G L O S S A R Y

    E x t e r i o r M a t e r i a l s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    I n t e r i o r D e c o r a t i v e M a t e r i a l s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S p i n d l e D i a g r a m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    R E C O R D I N G S T R A T E G Y & D O C U M E N T A T I O N

    R e c o r d i n g S t r a t e g y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    S c h e d u l e o f S i t e V i s i t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D o c u m e n t a t i o n a n d P r e s e r v a t i o n N e e d s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    C O N T I N U E D

    001

    002

    003

    006

    009

    010

    011

    012

    015

    016

    018

    024

    045

    046

    049

    051

    053

    055

    058

    060

    062

    063

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    3/35

    TA BLE O F C O N TEN TS

    C O N D I TI O N S

    C o n d i t i o n s S u r v e y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    W a l l C o n d i t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    T H E R M A L I M A G I N G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    R E F L E C T I O N S

    A t t i t u d e s a n d P o s s i b l e U s e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    C o n c l u s i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    B I B L I O G R A P H Y

    B i b l i o g r a p h y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    I m a g e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    A P P E N D I X

    F I E L D N O T E S

    M E A S U R E D D R A W I N G S

    065

    066

    070

    075

    076

    077

    078

    079

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    4/35

    UN IV ERSITY O F PEN N SYLV A N IA SPRING 20 11SITE A N A LYSIS O F HA W THO RN E HA LL

    IN TRO D U C TIO N

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    5/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA001

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL Introduction

    Executive Summary

    Hawthorne Hall is a late nineteenth-century architectural gem located in West

    Philadelphias Powelton Village area. After thriving as a center for social activity in its early years,

    deferred maintenance and lack of funding has resulted in significant loss of historical fabric on

    the buildings interior and rapidly declining architectural features on its exterior. Through the

    University of Pennsylvanias HPSV 601 spring semester Recording and Site Analysis class, we five

    first year Historic Preservation graduate students conducted a comprehensive assessment of the

    structure in its current state.

    Archival research has illuminated the buildings former life and surrounding community,

    careful on-site studies have revealed clues as to the original layout and interior decoration, and color

    and texture unrenderable in field notes have been documented using digital SLR photography.

    Floor plans and elevations mapped by hand and converted into AutoCAD were also compiled for

    future reference, as were notations of possible previous architectural interventions. Additionally,

    current conditions and preservation concerns were assessed both visually and with the aid of

    thermal photography.

    Through numerous site visits, continued research, and countless hours of recording, our

    team has come to better understand and appreciate Hawthorne Hall and its Annex. We are pleased

    to present our findings this fifth day of May, 2011.

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    6/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    7/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA006

    Statement of Significance

    Near the edge of the Powelton Village neighborhood in West Philadelphia stands

    Hawthorne Hall, a structure remarkable not only for its interesting and unusual architectural style

    and detailing, but also for its social and historical significance. Constructed in 1895 as part of a

    unified block of buildings, Hawthorne Hall maintains a prominent presence on Lancaster Avenue,

    an historic route between Philadelphia and Lancaster, PA. The Hawthorne Hall unit, whose facade

    curves onto Hamilton Street from Lancaster Avenue, is well positioned to attract the attention of

    West Philadelphia-bound passersby. The block further illustrates the development and evolution

    of its neighborhood, and serves as an example of a rare and overlooked type of public space: the

    fraternal lodge. Additionally, it exhibits an eclectic conglomeration of high style elements typically

    seen in the work prominent local architects who designed for elite Center City Philadelphians.

    During the last quarter of the nineteenth and the first quarter of the twentieth centuries,

    Philadelphias western periphery was ripe for development. Improved public transportation

    facilitated faster and cheaper commutes to and from Center City, and working and middle class

    households experienced an increase in income, allowing increased spending on properties and

    consumer goods.1

    In the late 1890s, operative builders2 Arthur Wright and Adolphus Prentzel took

    advantage of the demand for new housing and commercial spaces, erecting blocks of speculative

    row houses on Center City Philadelphias periphery. The majority of their developments

    were located in North Philadelphia, near their offices at 3560 Marshall Street and later, 2043

    Westmoreland Street.3

    In 1895, on the edge of a lumber yard in the Powelton Village neighborhood of West

    Philadelphia, Wright and Prentzel erected a curved row of attached mixed-use buildings. The

    rows most prominent unit, Hawthorne Hall, is stylistically consonant with its flanking buildings

    but distinguished by its concentration of ornamentation and its unique relationship to Lancaster

    Avenue. At the time of the developments completion, Lancaster Avenue, which spanned the sixty

    1 John Henry Hepp, The Middle-class City: Transforming Space and Time in Philadelphia, 1876-1926 (Philadelphia:

    University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003), 25-47.

    2 1419 W. Erie Ave, Philadelphia Architects and Buildings website, accessed 8 February, 2011. http://www.

    philadelphiabuildings.org/pab/app/pj_display.cfm/934394

    3 Laura A. DiPasquale, Hawthorne Hall: Vibrant, Versatile, and Vacant (University of Pennsylvania, 2010),

    13-16.

    History & Significance

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    8/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA007

    five miles between Philadelphia and Lancaster, PA, was a booming commercial corridor.1

    The Hawthorne Hall block maintains the scale of its context, mainly consisting of two and

    three story brick houses. The block is distinguished from its surroundings by fine building materials

    and ornamentation. Developers Wright and Prentzel employed the use of materials such as iron-

    speckled Roman brick, Connecticut Milford pink granite, and galvanized iron sheet metal. In

    addition, they incorporated high style architectural elements including gable fronts, diaper pattern

    brickwork, ornate bay windows, ornamental terra cotta panels, and arched entrance portals. As a

    whole, the composition represents a speculative developers interpretation of the architecture of

    local academic eclectics Theophilius Parsons Chandler, Frank Miles Day, and Wilson Eyre, Jr.

    While it is unclear exactly how Wright and Prentzel believed the social hall portion of their

    building would be used, the diversity of its early tenants indicates the building was a keystone in

    its community. From at least 1902 until 1930, the ground floor was used as a drug store while the

    upper floors were utilized by numerous fraternal organizations and clubs such as the Order of Odd

    Fellows, the Knights of Pythias, and the Irish National Forresters Benefit Society.2 According to

    scholars Paul Rich and David Merchant, at that time, fraternal lodges played an important role in

    the community, often doubling as theatres and even schools and post offices. They also asserted

    lodges have been a neglected factor in considering the creation of public space.3 Newspaper

    articles and advertisements confirm the Hall, complete with stage and scenery was rented for

    social events since at least 1911. Such events included community meetings, celebrations, dances,

    and boxing matches. It was also found the drug store once functioned as a post office.4

    During the second half of the twentieth century, deindustrialization and suburbanization

    contributed to the economic decline of West Philadelphia and other urban neighborhoods in

    the Northeastern United States. Throughout those decades, Hawthorne Hall was owned by a

    succession of Christian organizations and was used as a storefront church. In 1984, it was listed on

    the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The entire row was listed as a significant part of

    4 Historical Markers: Marker Details: Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike. Explore PA History website, ac-

    cessed 8 February, 2011. http://explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=373.

    5 DiPasquale, 13-17.

    6 Paul Rich and David Merchant, The Egyptian Influence on Nineteenth-Century Freemasonry (Roanoke, VA: Nine-

    teenth Century Studies Association, 2001), 4.

    7 DiPasquale, 16-19.

    History & Significance

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    9/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    10/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA009

    1 9 0 7

    History & Significance

    HTTP:// DLA .LIBRA RY.UPENN .EDU/ DLA / A RCHIVES/ DETA IL.HTM L?ID=A RCHIVES_20090 1261 43

    2 0 1 1

    THE B LO C K : THEN & N O W

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    11/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    12/35

    UN IV ERSITY O F PEN N SYLV A N IA SPRING 20 11SITE A N A LYSIS O F HA W THO RN E HA LL

    BUILD IN G D ESC RIPTIO N

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    13/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA018

    Hawthorne Hall and its curious counterparts gracefully wrap the north intersection of

    North 39th Street, Lancaster Avenue, and Hamilton Street. The blocks faades are graced with

    whimsical detailing and subtle indications of unit division and interior functions.

    Numbers 3839-3849 Hamilton Street, 3849-3861 Lancaster Avenue, and 431-437 North

    39th Street stand shoulder to shoulder sharing common architectural detailing including cornice

    caps, fenestration patterns, bays, and polychromatic brickwork. Perhaps the most distinctive feature

    of the elevation of Hawthorne Halls block is its jubilant roofline, with ogee and flat gable fronts

    separated by sloping pagoda roofs interspersed among more traditional flat gables.

    The block is composed of nineteen individual units, each in one of three distinct styles

    (pattern types A, B, or C) arranged from east to west in an A-B-B-A-A-C-A-A-B-B-A-A-C-A-A-B-B-A-A configuration.1 The majority of the block is composed of rectilinear row house units (pattern

    types A and B), with ground floor commercial space and upper level apartments. Pattern type A

    is notable for its exotic ogee gables and pressed metal bay windows. Pattern type B appears more

    traditional in its composition of flat gables, third-story arched windows, and rectangular second-

    story windows. Practical flat roofs reside behind the buildings false fronts on the row house

    portions of the block (pattern type A and B). Two wedge-shaped units with wide, two-tiered gable

    roofs (pattern type C) gently curve around the corners of the blocks, creating seamless transitions

    onto both North 39th and Hamilton Streets.

    The stepped gable of the easternmost C wedge bears an intricate terracotta plaque with

    the name Hawthorne Hall. The corners of the two-tiered parapet are articulated by sphere-topped

    finials. Narrow sections of pagoda style roof slopes separate C sections from the adjoining A

    unit ogee gables.

    Fading diaper-pattern brickwork underlines the Hawthorne Hall panel. A thin belt course

    of rusticated stonework beneath the diamond patterning is met by three narrow stone keystones

    which top the brick arches of the large windows below. Though currently boarded up with little

    original glass remaining, wooden muntins divide the glazing. From this, a central rectangular piecesurrounded by three irregularly shaped panes is created.

    Directly below the deteriorating stone sills of the three central arched windows lies a

    12 Chan, 6-13.

    Descriptive Analysis

    Building Description

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    14/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    15/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA020

    Street by a doorway located along the eastern wall.

    Carved wooden chairs, theater seats, glassware and flyers are strewn about, blanketing the

    wood and partially carpeted f loor. The faded red and yellow carpet depicts a diamond and oval

    motif. Large sections of it are peeled back, and it is covered in sheet rock, plaster, paint chips and

    dust. Though the general layout of this room appears to have been untouched for decades, virtually

    all finishes on f loor, ceiling and walls have been altered, removed, added, or have deteriorated.

    To the north side of the space, a stage raised approximately four feet off the floor sits at the

    narrowing portion of the buildings wedge. Though a pile of Gothic chairs and wooden theater

    seats currently block the front of the stage, access to the platform is gained through a set of feeble

    wooden stairs on the left. Approximately five feet in depth, the stage is framed by a rounded square

    surround and paneled in faux-wood vinyl. The stage background is punctured by a large doorway

    which reveals staircases behind.

    The pair of walls extending outward from the stage display wainscoting at the base

    topped with severely chipped paint. A simple wood cornice around three sides of the space has

    clearly replaced the original cornice, as remnants of historic detailing are present on the eastern

    wall. These details consist of a more intricate cove molding with a cable molding trim. Remnants

    of a pressed-tin ceiling and corbel capping featuring abstract lion-like faces also appear. Simple

    pilasters spanning the height of the space interrupt the side walls at a rough mid-point. The

    majority of the ceiling has been removed for structural repair and reinforcement, revealing balloon

    frame construction. In the center of the ceiling is a scrolled circular medallion, believed to have

    been a ventilation cover.

    On the south side of the building, along the street facing wall, wainscoting continues from

    the side walls to the window bays and arched windows. Perpendicular to the exterior wall and

    windows is a dark wood bar cabinet with a mirrored center section. This piece faces the western

    wall and is separated from the main two-story space by a section of wall studs and bracing.

    The double-story Hall space is interrupted by a severely degenerated mezzanine level

    accessible only through a small stair stemming from the Halls main stair. The mezzanine is

    precariously suspended by thin metal rods and is further supported by contemporary structural

    wooden bracing above and beneath. A row of theater chairs remains on the far western portion of

    the mezzanine.

    Building Description

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    16/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA021

    The Hawthorne Hall Annex, of pattern type A, adjoins Hawthorne Hall on its east side.

    In the shared ground floor vestibule are two entrances allowing access to the Annex. To the far

    right, a double entryway perpendicular to the front faade provides access to the Annexs first floor.

    The other door, parallel to the faade, reveals a narrow staircase leading to the second story. Bothdoors are original.

    The buildings first floor is open, lit by an arched window on the main faade and two

    windows at the northeast wall. The spaces footprint appears rectangular but is quite complex in

    its geometry. Walls deviate to accommodate the staircase and a heating duct, and they become

    narrower in the rear third portion of the room. The west wall is partially diagonal, resulting in the

    north wall being shorter than that of the main faade.

    On the first floor, little original fabric remains. The northeast wall has been replaced with

    CMU blocks and the ceiling removed, exposing wooden beams. The floorboards in the rear portion

    have also been removed and replaced with plywood. Ghost outlineson the diagonal wall suggest

    there may have been an elevated platform at one time.

    The second story of the Annex shares a similar footprint as the first. Six windows

    punctuate the back of the east wall and a single opening in the rear wall lets in additional light.

    Two prominent features in the space are bay windows with red-painted glass on the main facade

    along with a vibrant blue staircase and balustrade leading to the third story. The staircase is located

    on the west wall, next to an open doorway which directly connects to the Hall.

    Like the first floor, the second floor retains little original fabric. The ceiling has been

    removed and floorboards have been replaced with plywood. New windows and wooden framing

    have been installed on the northeast wall.1 Varied paint colors, original wallpaper remnants,

    grooves in the ceiling joists, and differing lath patterns indicate former partitions.

    The third story floor plate is also congruent with the first and second floors. The painted

    walls, each donning a vibrant shade of red, blue, or green, are peeling, revealing the white plaster

    that covers the first and second floor walls. The space is lit by two large windows on the main

    faade and seven windows on the east wall.

    Relative to the first and second floors, the third floor retains a substantial amount of

    original fabric. The ceiling has been removed, yet the floorboards and several heating grills remain.

    13 Discussions with the owner indicate that these windows were installed in the position of the original windows.

    Building Description

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    17/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    18/35

    UN IV ERSITY O F PEN N SYLV A N IA SPRING 20 11SITE A N A LYSIS O F HA W THO RN E HA LL

    PH O TO G RA PH S

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    19/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA024

    Photographs

    BA SEM EN T3 8 4 9 LA N C A STER A V EN U E

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    20/35

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    21/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA033

    Photographs

    SEC O N D FLO O R3 8 4 9 LA N C A STER A V EN U E

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    22/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA034

    Photographs

    B A L C O N Y3 8 4 9 LA N C A STER A V EN U E

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    23/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA035

    Photographs

    SEC O N D FLO O R3 8 4 9 LA N C A STER A V EN U E

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    24/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA049

    As one of two C pattern units on the block, it is worthwhile to briefly discuss the

    similarities and differences between Hawthorne Hall and its twin, and the factors that indicate

    the greater importance of Hawthorne Hall itself. The other unit, which is located at 3859-61

    Lancaster Ave and wraps the block onto North 39th Street, is almost identical in exterior detailing

    but differs greatly in interior programming. The faade is less intact than that of Hawthorne Hall,

    with almost all of the decorative metalwork (including the cornices and bay windows) removed.

    While both units feature identically placed terracotta panels, only Hawthorne Halls bears text;

    3859 Lancasters main panel is purely figurative.

    The ground floor is currently home to True Light Ministry, an active storefront church, and

    the upper stories were previously rented as apartments. Like the ground floor of Hawthorne Hall,

    this space is largely open, with one large room acting as the sanctuary and an adjoining, narrower

    room functioning as a social and dining space. It is the only other unit on the block accessed

    through two points of entry, one of which opens directly onto the sidewalk.

    Like Hawthorne Hall, the second and third floors are accessed through a separate door

    in the adjacent vestibule to the east. Here, the programmatic differences between the spaces are

    especially noticeable. While the two-story auditorium of Hawthorne Hall takes up the entirety

    of the second and third floors, the space above 3859 Lancaster has two distinct floors divided

    into multiple apartments. On both the second and third floors the stairway leads to a narrow

    hallway featuring a window at its north end. Two apartments on the second floor open onto this

    hallway, one with one bedroom, the other with two. The room configuration of these spaces is

    fairly haphazard as the walls attempt to negotiate the wedge-shaped structure. This creates odd

    room configurations which sometimes intersect with the street-facing windows. The moldings

    around the doors and the baseboards match those of Hawthorne Hall, indicating that at least

    some of these details might be original. The most recent occupant of any of these apartments

    vacated the property in 1998, with other rooms having been vacant longer. Many of the spaces have

    deteriorating paint and plaster.

    One can speculate that perhaps the builders believed one social hall on the block was

    sufficient and that apartments would be a more profitable use of space. Whatever the differences,

    the C units represent an extremely interesting and unusual solution to the common problem of

    corner buildings. The choice to create a curving faade with elaborate gables at these intersections

    Comparison of Hawthorne Hall and 3849-61 Lancaster Avenue

    Building Description

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    25/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA050

    undoubtedly made construction more difficult. However, this choice opened the units up to a

    highly trafficked street, making them visible from a distance coming to or from Center City.

    Building Description

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    26/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA051

    A

    C

    B

    C

    C

    C

    HA W THO RN E HA LL C PO RTIO N N EIG HBO O RIN G C PO RTIO N

    Building Description

    A B C PA TTERN TYPES

    BLO C K PA TTERN

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    27/35

    UN IV ERSITY O F PEN N SYLV A N IA SPRING 20 11SITE A N A LYSIS O F HA W THO RN E HA LL

    REC O RD IN G STRA TEG Y

    & D O C UM EN TA TIO N

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    28/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA060

    The recording strategy for Hawthorne Hall and its Annex developed with the

    understanding that current documentation is not adequate for the purpose of recognizing the

    sites full significance. Given the lack of existing documentation, our initial goals were broad and

    all encompassing. We began with a descriptive analysis including written documentation of the

    history and architecture of the site in order to convey its significance. Beyond the narrative, we

    wanted to provide interior documentation before further fabric was lost. Initial documentation

    tools included photography, total station, and field measurements. A conditions assessment for

    the exterior was also imperative given the instability of the historically significant features. We

    experimented with thermal imaging as an additional means of assessment, but these are cursory

    observations and should not be taken as evaluative.

    Due to the extensive needs of the project and the semesters limited timeframe,

    photography became an essential component of our recording strategy. As the quickest and cheapest

    tool that conveys the most information, we wanted our photographs to fully represent the building.

    The range of our photographs includes context shots, facade details, room views, pictures of and

    from the roof, and interior architectural details. Some initial photographic issues we encountered

    dealt with challenges presented by the site itself. The south-facing facade allows abundant and harsh

    sunlight into the interior, while awkwardly shaped or tight spaces limited our angles. Additionally,

    clutter and dilapidated floorboards hindered stabilization of the tripod, and dust clouds muddled

    the photographs. Beyond these issues, we were able to capture the expansive interior, including thebasement, with the help of Joe Elliot and additional lighting.

    We utilized the total station with photo rectification software to create a scaled elevation

    of the main faade, which would serve as the basis for our conditions assessment.1 However, the

    curvature of the main faade made rectification accuracy extremely difficult. Due to the time

    limitations of the semester, we were not able to fully correct it. However, we took several steps to

    increase the level of accuracy. First, we split the facade into three parts: the curved central portion

    and the two relatively flat portions to the east and west. By separating them, we were able to reach

    a more reliable level of accuracy for the side elevations because they were not as curved. We werethen able to use these relatively accurate rectifications as reference for rectifying the curved portion.

    Horizontal measurements taken from completed floor plans also aided by providing additional

    1 The rear (north) elevation was not included, as it does not have a full view accessible for measuring with the

    total station.

    Recording Strategy

    Recording Strategy & Documentation

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    29/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA061

    accuracy. Beyond the issues of the curved facade and rectification inaccuracies, our only other

    obstacles while using the total station were traffic obstructions and vibrations.

    Field measurements were taken in order to create an accurate set of drawings for an

    otherwise undocumented space. This recording method proved to be difficult and tedious as the

    interior space is extremely complex. 3849 Lancaster Avenue, the Hall portion, features a curved

    wall, tapering footprint, and interior walls oriented at various angles. We used trilateration to

    account for the unknown angles and acquire multiple points of reference with which to check

    our measurements. Anticipating difficulties, we began our field notes and drawings early in the

    semester, and made corrections along the way. The level of detail that we reached was dependent

    upon the time that we had available.

    Upon entering our field measurements into AutoCAD software, it was clear that some

    were substantially inaccurate. This is attributable to various complications that we encountered

    in the field, which hindered the recording process. Abundant debris, clutter, and hazardous floor

    conditions obstructed access to parts of the building. Inconsistent surfaces where finishes had been

    removed or deteriorated from walls, ceilings, and floors impeded the accuracy of the measurements.

    There were also occasional technical complications with unfamiliar equipment. Unexpectedly, we

    encountered subtly complex (non-recilinear) geometry in the Halls adjoining Annex space, adding

    further challenges to our recording efforts. Throughout the semester, measurements were taken

    multiple times and inconsistencies were noted on field notes.

    Recording Strategy & Documentation

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    30/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA063

    Simple interior and exterior observations highlight the deteriorating state of Hawthorne

    Hall and its Annex. Though the current owner has spent time working to stabilize the site, there is

    no concrete vision of how the space will be used and much work appears to have been conducted

    without the consultation of preservation experts. Therefore, we found it imperative to conduct

    detailed documentation of the site before further historical fabric was lost during the renovation

    process.

    Hawthorne Halls historic and architectural significance is locally recognized within

    Philadelphia, as evidenced by its listing on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. Written

    in 1984, the Register nomination form fails to comprehensively define the historic attributes and

    significance of the property. While it acknowledges Hawthorne Halls position as representative

    of West Philadelphias 19th century development into a streetcar suburb, it only discusses such

    historical attributes briefly. No indication of the structures original or subsequent functions exists,

    and greater social impacts of the buildings presence within the community are largely ignored.

    Rather, the form primarily concentrates on the buildings exterior elements with no description or

    statement of its interior significance.

    One potential explanation for the omission of the interior on the nomination form could

    be the absence of historic architectural drawings and interior photographs, as well as written

    documentation of the property. The Philadelphia Historical Commission keeps a small file

    containing the Register nomination form, plans for wall repair, and limited historic photographs of

    the exterior, which appear to be from the 1960s-80s. Historic maps including 1862 Smedley Atlas,

    1895 and 1910 Bromley Atlases, 1942 and 1962 Land Use maps, and 1960 and 1980 Sanborn maps

    are available at the Free Library and on philageohistory.org. The Free Library also has one large format

    negative of the property from 1955. The City Archives holds the propertys chain of title but due to

    numerous subdivisions, such documents are not particularly clear or easy to follow. Two research

    papers, compiled in fall 2010 by University of Pennsylvania Historic Preservation graduate students

    Laura DiPasquale and Rebecca Chan attempt to synthesize information on the site to provide

    an overall descriptive analysis of Hawthorne Halls exterior and historical context. Much of theinformation for these papers was gathered from historical newspapers (particularly the Philadelphia

    Inquirer), reverse-look up business directories, and census data.

    The property has served a variety of uses over the years, most recently as a storefront church.

    Presently, there is no clear vision for how the space is to be used, and therefore the buildings

    Documentation and Preservation Needs

    Recording Strategy & Documentation

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    31/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA064

    potential economic value has yet to be realized. Additionally, its market value has dropped

    significantly as a result of the national housing crisis and economic recession. The current owner

    does not have the funds for a full renovation and would consider selling the property if it would

    prove profitable.

    The Peoples Emergency Center of Lancaster Avenue (PEC) is a non-profit social services

    organization which includes Hawthorne Hall in its business corridor revitalization plans. PEC aims

    to work with the owner to clean and stabilize the property to make it more attractive to potential

    buyers. PEC is also working with the owner to obtain grants to help fund the rehabilitation efforts.

    Delay in obtaining these grants can be partially attributed to the absence of required conditions

    assessments of the buildings exterior and interior, including base drawings and recordings of

    architectural details. We hope this compilation will better furnish the owner with such information.

    While the interior has been fully documented through drawings and photographs, the

    complexity and vastness of the space has limited the scope of a conditions assessment for the

    purposes of this report. Attention has therefore been focused on the facade, which is missing

    significant features. A conditions report, included in this IPD, identifies areas of specific concern.

    Short-term intervention projects include general cleaning of the interior and weather-

    proofing strategies. The property has already been greatly damaged by water leakage through the

    roof and windows. This has spurred the removal of the Halls original pressed tin ceiling in order to

    patch the roof and replace select structural members. The history of vacancy and inconsistent use

    has contributed to an overall state of decay. As such, some areas are difficult to access because of

    unstable floors and ceilings.

    Because the future use of the property is undetermined and piecemeal renovation is being

    undertaken without construction plans, the remaining historic fabric is at risk of being lost. It is

    the hope of this team that the provided documentation and analysis may help potential buyers

    to determine a future use for the building, make efforts to obtain rehabilitation funding through

    grants, and recognize the value in maintaining historically and architecturally significant features of

    the property.

    Recording Strategy & Documentation

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    32/35

    UN IV ERSITY O F PEN N SYLV A N IA SPRING 20 11SITE A N A LYSIS O F HA W THO RN E HA LL

    REFLEC TIO N S

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    33/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA074

    Throughout the last decade, Lancaster Avenue has experienced a surge in revitalization,

    particularly along the section adjacent to Drexel University. Many new businesses have opened

    including restaurants, cafes, art galleries, dance and yoga studios, a bicycle repair shop, and a hair

    salon. These new businesses, coupled with a budding civic culture, have transformed the corridor

    into a local destination. Investment continues to proceed westward but it has yet to progress past

    the 3700 block.

    We are certainly not alone in our interest in Hawthorne Hall. During our visits to the site,

    several residents of the surrounding neighborhood stopped to question us about our work and to

    offer their thoughts about and preferences for its adaptive reuse. These passersby, who vary in age,

    gender and ethnicity, were excited to see active work at the site as it functions as a neighborhood

    landmark and point of curiosity. While these residents are far from a representative sample, the

    general consensus seems to be that the buildings central positioning would make it ideal for an

    active use that would appeal to the diverse population of the community.

    New Beginnings in Christ Ministry, Inc. is adeqately equipped to complete small-scale

    stabilization of the site but lacks the ability to accomplish a complete rehabilitation given its current

    state. In order for proper rehabilitation and reuse to occur, the organization would likely need to

    sell the building for a reasonable price to a development entity. That entity would be positioned

    to apply for a number of financial incentives, including the federal tax credit and the Preservation

    Alliance of Philadelphias Vital Neighborhoods Initiative grant.

    The structures size, complex program, and poor condition make rehabilitation and reuse

    challenging, yet there is a great deal of potential in the remaining architectural fabric. For the

    University of Pennsylvania course HSPV 625 Economics of Historical Preservation, one group of

    students examined the feasibility of use as a live-work arts facility and caf. In their program, the

    artists apartments and studios, would be located on the second and third floors of the Annex, the

    gallery and performance space in the hall, and the caf in the former drug store space.

    Most recently, a medical supply company based out of New York expressed interest inleasing both units ground f loors. Within the past two months, representatives from that company,

    including an architect, have visited the site.

    Attitudes and Possible Uses

    Reflections

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    34/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    H SP V 60 1 SP RI N G 2011

    UN IVERSITY O F PEN N SYLVA N IA075

    We recommend that future rehabilitation respect and retain as much of the existing fabric

    as possible. The character defining facade is stable, requiring only the securing of exposed portions

    and replacement of lost features. The brick does not require repointing, and the building exterior

    can remain as it is, save a few replacement windows and detail replacement/repainting where

    necessary.

    The interior features, and particularly the stage, are at the greatest risk of being

    lost. Therefore, we recommend consideration of uses that are compatible with the existing

    configuration. A complete glossary of historic finishes and details have been included in this report

    should the owner or future contractor wish to replicate any historic elements.

    Given the extensive difficulties encountered during the hand measuring process, we also

    caution all measurements to be verified in field. Should time or money permit, we feel the most

    accurate way to capture the structures exact form and measurements would be through laster

    scanning.

    Recommendations

    Reflections

  • 7/30/2019 DiPasquale SiteAnalysis

    35/35

    H A W TH O RN E H A LL

    The Hawthorne Hall Integrated Project Dossier represents the culmination of more than a

    semester of research, field survey, computer work, and countless hours of thoughtful consideration.

    Although our group has done as much as possible in the time given, we recognize that one

    semester was not nearly enough time to capture all we would have liked about this previously

    undocumented site. We hope our work will provide a strong starting point for further research and

    documentation, and aid in the successful rehabilitation of this exceptional building set.

    Throughout its history, Hawthorne Hall has adapted to suit the needs of the community

    as a social hall, drug store, and storefront church. It is evident from the buildings deliberate

    positioning, intricate detailing and unique programming that its original developers were fully

    aware the building and its block would make a resounding impact on the community. Although

    changing economic tides left the structure largely vacant and deteriorating in recent years, the

    overall integrity of the Hawthorne Hall block is intact and contributes to the appearance and feel of

    its West Philadelphia neighborhood. Given the chance, this once vibrant, enigmatic building can

    once again play a role in the 21st century West Philadelphia life.

    Conclusion

    Reflections