Artificial Photosynthesis: The Future Of Renewable Fuels And Chemicals Rich Masel 1 , Brian Rosen 2 , Amin Salehi-Khojin 1 , Wei Zhu 2 1 Dioxide Materials 2 UIUC This work was supported by Dioxide Materials and the U.S. Department of Energy under grant DE-SC0004453. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department Of Energy.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Artificial Photosynthesis:The Future Of Renewable Fuels And Chemicals
Rich Masel1, Brian Rosen2, Amin Salehi-Khojin1, Wei Zhu2
1Dioxide Materials 2UIUC
This work was supported by Dioxide Materials and the U.S. Department of Energy under grant DE-SC0004453. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department Of Energy.
• Independent R&D company founded July 2009• Focus: Nanotechnology to solve big problems
(e.g. global warming)
• Patents pending – CO2 remediation, energy conservation, indoor air quality control
• Presently one Fortune 500 licensee
About Dioxide Materials
• Introduction of artificial photosynthesis– Why it is the future of renewable fuels and chemicals
• Description of three different processes• Photochemical water splitting• Hydrogen electrolysis
• CO2 electrolysis
– Why CO2 electrolysis is preferred
• Discussion about Dioxide Material’s recent advances in CO2 electrolysis
CO2 Remediation via Artificial Photosynthesis
Today’s Agenda
Artificial Photosynthesis: An Alternate Route to Renewable Fuels and Chemicals
Biofuels
• Use photosynthesis to convert CO2 plus water and sunlight into biomass
• Use chemical or biological processes to convert biomass into fuels
Biofuels Versus Artificial Photosynthesis
Artificial Photosynthesis
• Converts sunlight and wind into electricity
• Uses electricity and chemical processes to convert CO2 and water into fuels
Biofuels Versus Artificial Photosynthesis
Biofuels
• Technology works today• Economically feasible
– Tax subsidy
But
• Competes with food supply• Energy inefficient
– Corn only 1% efficient in converting sunlight into biomass – 0.04% to kernels
Artificial Photosynthesis
• Technology works today• No competition with food supply• Potential for high energy efficiency
But
• Not economically feasible today• Energy efficiency unproven
Process Comparison
Potential Energy Efficiencies
Efficiencies Biofuels Artificial Photosynthesis
Solar collection 0.2-2% (corn 1% to cellulose)
10-35% (solar cells)
Transportation
25-75% of energy used in planting, fertilizing,
harvesting, and transporting crops
Electricity loses5% of energy during transmission across
country
Present process 5% <1%
Potential process 36% 36%
Potential overall 0.3% 8%
Artificial Photosynthesis is the Future of Renewable Fuels and Chemicals
• At maximum efficiency (converting cellulose) biotechnology would need 3,000,000 km2 of arable land to meet U.S. fuels and chemicals needs– Not enough unused arable land in U.S. to meet needs
• Solar collectors need 200,000 km2 – Desert land & offshore wind sufficient
• Technology exists to produce hydrocarbons
There is no other choice
There are Three Types of Artificial Photosynthesis Processes
• Photochemical water splitting3H2O +h →3H2 + 1.5 O2
3H2 + CO2 → (CH2)x
• Water electrolysis3H2O →3H2 + 1.5 O2
3H2 + CO2 → (CH2)x +2H2O
• CO2 electrolysis2CO2 →2CO + O2
2CO + H2O → (CH2)x + CO2
Artificial Photosynthesis Processes
Photochemical Water SplittingMay Never Be Practical
• At 10% energy efficiency, 100,000 bbl/day plant covers 670 km2
– About the size of NYC
• 3,000 mi of glass pipe– containing a stoichiometric
3H2O → 3H2 + 1.5 O2 Reverse water gas shift:H2 + CO2 → H2O + CO
Fischer Tropsch2H2 + CO → H2O + (CH2)X
Electrolyzer
Hydrogen Electrolysis Process Economics
+NERL Report: J. Levene, B. Kroposki, and G. Sverdrup Wind Energy andProduction of Hydrogen and Electricity — Opportunities for Renewable Hydrogen
Assumption• Wind-generated electricity • Net hydrogen cost of
$4.03/kg today, droppingto $2.33/kg in 2030+
$2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 $4.50 $5.00
2010 2020 2030Hyd
roge
n Co
st, $
/gal
fuel
CO2 Electrolysis is PotentiallyMore Energy Efficient
Water gas shift:2H2O + 2CO → 2H2 + 2CO2
Fischer Tropsch2H2 + CO → H2O + (CH2)X
Combined chemistry:H2O + 2CO → (CH2)X + CO2
2CO2 → 2CO + 1.5 O2
Electrolyzer
How CO2 Electrolysis Works
CO2 + 2e- + H2O → CO + 2 OH-
4 OH- → O2 + H2O + 4e-
CO2 + e- → (CO2)-
(CO2)- + 2H+ + e- → CO + H2O
CO2 + e- → (CO2)-
(CO2-) + H2O + e- → CO + 2OH-
Alkaline conditionsAcidic conditions
electrolyte
anode
cathode
electrolyte
anode
cathode
Ideal Thermodynamic Comparison
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Ener
gy K
j/m
ole
CH2
Reaction Progress
water electrolysis CO₂ Combined cycle
Electrolysis Water gas shift
30% electricity waste
(Title TBD by R. Masel)
0
500
1000
1500
2000En
ergy
Kj/
mol
e CH
2
Reaction Progress
CO₂ Combined cycle Actual Combined
Electrolysis
Water gas shift
Waste 70% of electricity
Ideal
Reaction Progress
Actual
CO2 Electrolysis Also Results in Issue Cathode Overpotential
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.2
Pb Cd Tl Bi In Zn Hg Sn Cu Ag Ga Pd Au
Volta
ge v
s SH
E
Equilibrium
Actual
Wastedenergy
High Energy in (CO2)- Intermediate Production Causes Overpotential
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Reaction Progress
(CO2)-
Free
Ene
rgy
Dioxide Material’s Patent PendingApproach to CO2 Electrolysis Solves
the Overpotential Problem
Dioxide Material’s Approach
Using two catalysts…• Ionic liquid or amine
to catalyze formation of (CO2)-
• Transition metal to catalyze the conversion of (CO2)- to products
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Reaction Progress
(CO2)-
Fre
e E
nerg
yEMIM-(CO2)-
…results in lower net energy loss.
SFG To Verify (CO2)- Formationat Low Overpotentials
Brian A. Rosen, Amin Salehi-Khojin, Prabuddha Mukherjee, Björn Braunschweig, John L. Haan, W. Zhu, Dana D. Dlott, Richard I. Masel, science under review
See Paper 295B12:55 Room 150F
2200 2300 2400 2500
-1.24 Vvs. SHE
-1.04
-0.84
-0.64
-0.44
-0.24
+0.04
+0.24
SF
G in
ten
sity
(a
rb. u
.)
wavenumber / cm-1
Emim-(CO2)-
CO Formation Also Observedat Very Low Potentials
1800 2000 2200 2400
S
FG
inte
nsi
ty (
arb
. u.)
wavenumber / cm-1
-0.25 V
-0.35 V
-0.45 V
-0.55 Vvs. SHE
Brian A. Rosen, Amin Salehi-Khojin, Prabuddha Mukherjee, Björn Braunschweig, John L. Haan, W. Zhu, Dana D. Dlott,Richard I. Masel, science under review
Steady CO Production Observed at 110°C
CO2 + 2e- + H2O → CO + 2 OH-
4 OH- → O2 + H2O + 4e-
Electrolyte with 100 mMol water
Pt anode
Pt cathode
PCO₂ = 1 AtmGC Analysis
Observe CO product with GCTurnover rate = xx/sec at 0.6 V (SHE)Ran for yy hours with no degradation
The Future of Dioxide Material’sPatent Pending Process
• CO2 electrolysis demonstrated at low overpotential– Requires two catalysts
• Lifetime studies needed• Need cell designs to suppress crossover
– (CO2)- concentration high – can cross over to anode
Electrolysis Technology Development Still Needed
• Better cell design to raise efficiency from 70% to 83%• Manufacturing expertise to lower capital cost of
electrolyzer from $740/kW to $300/kW• Government investment
– U.S.D.O.E. spends $500m/yr. on biotech, $50m/yr. on solar water splitting, but has no specific program for electrolyzers. (Dioxide Materials is funded through SBIR.)
Summary
• Artificial photosynthesis is the future of renewable fuels and chemicals– Only alternative that can produce enough renewable
hydrocarbons to meet the U.S. needs
• Two routes make sense– Hydrogen electrolysis + reverse water-gas shift
– CO2 electrolysis
• Dioxide Materials has made a breakthrough in CO2 electrolysis
The People Who Did The WorkCO2 Catalysis, Electrochemistry
CO2 SFG
Prof Dana Dlott
Brian Rosen Wei Zhu
Björn BraunschweigPrabuddha MukherjeeJohn Haan
Amin Salehi-Khojin
Questions
NYC Sized Solar Collector Is Needed
Assume 100,000 barrels/day -1% of US demand5 kw-hr/m2/day solar flux, 5% efficiency solar to gasoline