© Apr-18 Math2Market GmbH 1 Sven Linden Tom Cvjetkovic Erik Glatt Jens-Oliver Schwarz Andreas Wiegmann Geo-CT Meeting 20. April 2015 Digital Rock Physics
© Apr-18 Math2Market GmbH 1
Sven Linden
Tom Cvjetkovic
Erik Glatt
Jens-Oliver Schwarz
Andreas Wiegmann
Geo-CT Meeting
20. April 2015
Digital Rock Physics
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 2
Detailed In-situ DRP workflow I
Sampling Imaging Processing
Cropping
Noise reduction
Artifact reduction1
1 H. Andrä et al., „Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation,“ Computers & Geosciences, 2013 (43), pp. 25-32.
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 3
ImportGeoDetailed In-situ DRP workflow IIMulti-stage watershed algorithm1
1 H. Andrä et al., „Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation,“ Computers & Geosciences, 2013 (43), pp. 25-32.
CT-Scan
Segmentation
Solids Pore space
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 4
RockDictDetailed In-situ DRP Workflow III
Numericalcompression
Absolutepermeability
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 5
Comparison lab versus DRP
Lab measurement DRP simulation
Image courtesy of M. Halisch (LIAG)
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 6
GeoDictMath2Market Digital Rock Physics Portfolio
Geometrical parameters
Flowparameters
Electricalparameters
Mechanical parameters
Porosity
Pore size distribution
Percolation
Surface area
Tortuosity
Absolute permeability
Relative permeability
Multi-scale flow
Capillary pressure
curve
Formation factor
Resistivity index
Saturation exponent
Cementation
exponent
Elastic moduli
Stiffness
In-Situ conditions
© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 7
Thank you for your attention!