Top Banner

of 26

Digital image steganography Survey and analysis of current ... Digital image steganography: Survey and

May 13, 2020

ReportDownload

Documents

others

  • ARTICLE IN PRESS

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Signal Processing

    Signal Processing 90 (2010) 727–752

    0165-16

    doi:10.1

    � Cor E-m

    journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sigpro

    Review

    Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods

    Abbas Cheddad �, Joan Condell, Kevin Curran, Paul Mc Kevitt

    School of Computing and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Computing and Engineering, University of Ulster at Magee, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, UK

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 1 December 2008

    Received in revised form

    17 August 2009

    Accepted 18 August 2009 Available online 6 September 2009

    Keywords:

    Digital image steganography

    Spatial domain

    Frequency domain

    Adaptive steganography

    Security

    84/$ - see front matter & 2009 Elsevier B.V. A

    016/j.sigpro.2009.08.010

    responding author.

    ail addresses: cheddad-a@email.ulster.ac.uk, c

    a b s t r a c t

    Steganography is the science that involves communicating secret data in an appropriate

    multimedia carrier, e.g., image, audio, and video files. It comes under the assumption

    that if the feature is visible, the point of attack is evident, thus the goal here is always to

    conceal the very existence of the embedded data. Steganography has various useful

    applications. However, like any other science it can be used for ill intentions. It has been

    propelled to the forefront of current security techniques by the remarkable growth in

    computational power, the increase in security awareness by, e.g., individuals, groups,

    agencies, government and through intellectual pursuit. Steganography’s ultimate

    objectives, which are undetectability, robustness (resistance to various image proces-

    sing methods and compression) and capacity of the hidden data, are the main factors

    that separate it from related techniques such as watermarking and cryptography. This

    paper provides a state-of-the-art review and analysis of the different existing methods

    of steganography along with some common standards and guidelines drawn from the

    literature. This paper concludes with some recommendations and advocates for the

    object-oriented embedding mechanism. Steganalysis, which is the science of attacking

    steganography, is not the focus of this survey but nonetheless will be briefly discussed.

    & 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Contents

    1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 728

    1.1. Nomenclature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 728

    1.2. Ancient steganography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729

    1.3. The digital era of steganography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729

    2. Steganography applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 730

    3. Steganography methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 732

    3.1. Steganography exploiting the image format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 733

    3.2. Steganography in the image spatial domain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734

    3.3. Steganography in the image frequency domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 736

    3.4. Adaptive steganography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 739

    4. Analysis and recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 741

    ll rights reserved.

    heddad@gmail.com (A. Cheddad).

    www.elsevier.com/locate/sigpro dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.08.010 mailto:cheddad-a@email.ulster.ac.uk mailto:cheddad@gmail.com

  • ARTICLE IN PRESS

    A. Cheddad et al. / Signal Processing 90 (2010) 727–752728

    5. Steganalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 745

    6. Conclusions and summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749

    References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 750

    1. Introduction

    The standard and concept of ‘‘What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG)’’ which we encounter sometimes while printing images or other materials, is no longer precise and would not fool a steganographer as it does not always hold true. Images can be more than what we see with our Human Visual System (HVS); hence, they can convey more than merely 1000 words.

    For decades people strove to develop innovative methods for secret communication. The remainder of this introduction highlights briefly some historical facts and attacks on methods (also known as steganalysis). A thorough history of steganography can be found in the literature [1–3].

    Fig. 1. The different embodiment disciplines of information hiding. The arrow

    Table 1 Comparison of steganography, watermarking and encryption.

    Criterion/ method

    Steganography Watermarkin

    Carrier Any digital media Mostly image

    Secret data Payload Watermark

    Key Optional

    Input files At least two unless in self-embedding

    Detection Blind Usually inform

    is needed for

    Authentication Full retrieval of data Usually achie

    Objective Secrete communication Copyright pre

    Result Stego-file Watermarked

    Concern Delectability/ capacity Robustness

    Type of attacks Steganalysis Image proces

    Visibility Never Sometimes (s

    Fails when It is detected It is removed

    Relation to

    cover

    Not necessarily related to the cover. The

    message is more important than the cover

    Usually becom

    cover is more

    Flexibility Free to choose any suitable cover Cover choice

    History Very ancient except its digital version Modern era

    Three techniques are interlinked, steganography, watermarking and cryptography. The first two are quite difficult to tease apart especially for those coming from different disciplines. Fig. 1 and Table 1 may eradicate such confusion. The work presented here revolves around steganography in digital images and does not discuss other types of steganography (such as linguistic or audio).

    1.1. Nomenclature

    Intuitively, this work makes use of some terms commonly used by steganography and watermarking communities. The term ‘‘cover image’’ will be used throughout this paper to describe the image designated to carry the embedded bits. We will be referring to an

    indicates an extension and bold face indicates the focus of this study.

    g Encryption

    /audio files Usually text based, with some

    extensions to image files

    Plain text

    Necessary

    One

    ative (i.e., original cover or watermark

    recovery)

    Blind

    ved by cross correlation Full retrieval of data

    serving Data protection

    -file Cipher-text

    Robustness

    sing Cryptanalysis

    ee Fig. 2) Always

    /replaced De-ciphered

    es an attribute of the cover image. The

    important than the message

    N/A

    is restricted N/A

    Modern era

  • ARTICLE IN PRESS

    A. Cheddad et al. / Signal Processing 90 (2010) 727–752 729

    image with embedded data, called herein payload, as ‘‘stego-image’’. Further ‘‘steganalysis’’ or ‘‘attacks’’ refer to different image processing and statistical analysis ap- proaches that aim to break or attack steganography algorithms (Fig. 2).

    1.2. Ancient steganography

    The word steganography is originally derived from Greek words which mean ‘‘Covered Writing’’. It has been used in various forms for thousands of years. In the 5th century BC Histaiacus shaved a slave’s head, tattooed a message on his skull and the slave was dispatched with the message after his hair grew back [1–4]. In Saudi Arabia at the King Abdulaziz City of science and technology, a project was initiated to translate into English some ancient Arabic manuscripts on secret writing which are believed to have been written 1200 years ago. Some of these manuscripts were found in Turkey and Germany [5]. Five hundred years ago, the Italian mathematician J�erôme Cardan reinvented a