Digital Radiography: a-Si Array Detectors for Industrial Applications Nityanand Gopalika, D. Mishra, V. Manoharan & Greg Mohr * Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory John F Welch Technology Center Bangalore *GE Inspection Technologies One Neumann Way MD K207 Cincinnati, OH 45215
33
Embed
Digital Detectors for Industrial Applications-Nityanand Gopalika
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Digital Radiography:a-Si Array Detectors for Industrial
Applications
Nityanand Gopalika, D. Mishra, V. Manoharan & Greg Mohr*
Industrial Imaging and Modeling LaboratoryJohn F Welch Technology Center
Bangalore
*GE Inspection TechnologiesOne Neumann Way MD K207
Cincinnati, OH 45215
Presentation Outline:
• Technology Development• Benefits of Digital Radiography• Quantifying Image Quality• Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems• Comparison of Imaging Devices: CCD, CMOS
and a-Si• Performance Study of Flat Panels
3 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Evolution of Direct Digital X-ray Detectors
Technology Development
Film radiography
Image intensifiers
Computed radiography
CCD technology
Direct digital radiography
Productivity Resolution
NDT World
SizeCost
4 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling LaboratoryProductivity and cost benefits
Benefits of Digital RadiographyProductivity• Faster response• Elimination of chemical processing• Automated inspection• Elimination of retakes
Cost• Elimination film and consumables• ROI in two to three years
Quality• Image processing and analysis• Reduces operators fatigue• Consistency
Advanced Application• Volumetric CT for High Throughput
5 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Measure of Image Quality
Quantifying Image Quality
Decreasing Noise
Incr
easi
ng C
ontr
ast
Contrast-to-Noise Ratio
Perceived Image Quality
What is a good Physical Measure of Image Quality?
6 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
MTF: Same Response to Signal and Noise
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
7 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Higher MTF Does Not Mean Better Imaging System
Contrast Limiting Spatial Resolution (LSR), MTF measured at high contrast
• bar patterns » 100% input contrast MTF indicates fraction of signal that will be seen in image.
Noise MTF measured under noiseless conditions. MTF transfers noise in addition to signal. Image noise can interfere with object detectability.
MTF Limitations
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
8 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
High MTF; But Poor Performance
SNR = 1
Higher limiting resolution of smallerpixels may not provide betterdetectability in noisy images.
MTF: High Middle Low
MTFHighMiddleLow
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
9 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
MTF is One Metric; But Not Enough
Traditional gauge used for quantifying image quality cannot be used as a stand alone metric.
• Quantum and electronic noise are unavoidable in digital imaging chain.
• SNR can vary widely across systems
• High SNR is key to better inspection power
• To increase SNR often the only way is to increase radiation dose,
unacceptable trade-off
• Achieving high SNR at lower dose: better imaging system
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
10 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
DQE = SNR2 at detector outputSNR2 at detector input
SNR = signal-to-noise ratio
DQE: Detective Quantum Efficiency
Measure of SNR transmittance
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
11 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Less Dose and Better Image
Input SNR2 proportional to radiation dose
DQEImage QualityInput Radiation Dose
• Traditional measures such as MTF, LSR are not sufficient to characterize detector performance
• Noise is a limiting factor for detectability, image processing, and advanced applications
Doubling DQE means:
• Same output SNR (“image quality”) at half the dose • 40% improvement in SNR at same dose
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
α
12 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
High DQE at Lower Dose
“Object”“Improved”DQE = 0.5
“Standard”DQE = 0.25
SNR = 5 SNR = 3.5 SNR = 2.5
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
13 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
High DQE Better Detectability
Film GE Detector
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
14 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Detector Design Keeping DQE in Mind
Image Quality Metric for Digital Systems
15 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
DQE
One Image Quality
Measure
MTFHigh Resolution(for small object
detection)
Measurements and Requirements
Low Noise(for clear visualization)
Noise (NPS)
Efficient X-Ray Conversion (for minimum exposure)
Signal (S)
The Detector Properties
Pixel SizeSampling, Fill
Factor, Aliasing
Scintillator/CouplingCsI, Lanex, Se
lens/Direct
PhotodetectoraSi, CCD,
CMOS
ReadoutElectronic Noise
NPSMTFS
QDQE
221 ⋅=
Detector Design for High DQE
16 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling LaboratoryFlat Panel Technology Variation
Flat Panel Technology
Direct Conversion (Se)
Photons
Selenium
Digital Data
Electrons
Read Out Electronics
Photons
Cesium Iodide (CsI)
Light
Electrons
Read Out Electronics
Amorphous Silicon Panel
Digital Data
Indirect Conversion (CsI)
17 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
CsI vs. SeCesium Iodide
• Very high DQE; potential for high image quality at low dose
• Fluoro capable• Advanced application capable• Mature technology: 25-year history
with Image Intensifiers
Selenium
• Direct conversion of X-Ray into electrical signals
• Currently not capable of fluoro • Low X-Ray absorption• High sensitivity to temperature
Again Keep DQE in Mind!!
18 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Point Spread Function for Different Detector Types
Electrons
Image Intensifiers CSI Flat panels Se Flat panels
MTF is One Part of the Story, DQE is the Other BIG Part
19 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
Photons
Scintillator
LightFiber Optic Taper
Electrons
CCD
Amorphous Silicon• Potentially high image quality at low
dose (high DQE)• Active Research on New Applications • Designed for X-Ray from the start• Compact packaging• Very high development cost
CCD• CCDs are easily available• Low development costs• “Transition” technology to
flat panel • High CCD cost• Tiling and design complexity
CCD Technology
20 /Industrial Imaging and Modeling Laboratory
All will convert visible energies into an electronic charge
Imager Dimensions• CCDs: 10 – 60-mm on a side• CMOS: 50-mm on a side• a-Si: 200 – 410-mm on a side
Size governed by silicon process• CCDs and CMOS – 6” wafers• Multiple chips/wafer – yield• a-Si – Large area deposition/glass