Differential Extinction Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History Cosmic Star Formation History Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech) Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt Adelberger Massive Galaxies over Cosmic Time, Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006
9
Embed
Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History
Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History. Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech) Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt Adelberger Massive Galaxies over Cosmic Time , Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006. Background. Bouwens & Illingworth (2006). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Differential Extinction Corrections: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation
HistoryHistory
Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech)
Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt AdelbergerMassive Galaxies over Cosmic Time, Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006
Background
Bouwens & Illingworth (2006)
Two ingredients for determining star formation and buildup of stellar mass in the universe:
(a)Census of Star-forming Galaxies
(b) Extinction Corrections
Maximum Likelihood Method
Systematic effects:
Photometric Scatter, Ly perturbations
Constrain E(B-V) distribution to get LF
Rest-Frame UV Luminosity Function at z~2-4
Z=2.2
Measuring Infrared Luminosities with Spitzer
Rest-frame UV spectroscopy
very accurate redshifts + photo-z’s for near-IR selected galaxies
MIPS 24 micron fluxes individual detections for L* galaxies at z~2
Accurately constrain infrared
luminosities of redshift 1.5<z<2.6
galaxies
MIPS vs. H
Relationship between Obscuration and L(bol)
Increasing dust-to-gas ratio with age
Z>>2?
Implications…
Evolution in average dust attenuation
Implications for the Cosmic SFRD…
Evolution in average dust attenuation Fan et al. 2001
After extinction
correction?Larger extinction Smaller
extinction
Conclusions • Local extinction laws apply to most high redshift galaxies (X-ray, radio, Local extinction laws apply to most high redshift galaxies (X-ray, radio,
dust-corrected UV, MIPS); typical galaxies at z~2 are LIRGsdust-corrected UV, MIPS); typical galaxies at z~2 are LIRGs
• Strong correlation between bolometric luminosity and dust obscuration, Strong correlation between bolometric luminosity and dust obscuration, but z~2 galaxies are factor of ~10 less obscured that local galaxies of a but z~2 galaxies are factor of ~10 less obscured that local galaxies of a given L(bol)given L(bol)
• Specific SFRs indicate wide range in evolutionary state of z~2 galaxiesSpecific SFRs indicate wide range in evolutionary state of z~2 galaxies
• Differential attenuation as function of redshift has implications forDifferential attenuation as function of redshift has implications for
slope of extinction-corrected Madau diagram at high z
Systematics important in constraining SFRD
(a) Extinction correction as function of z to fixed value of L*(bol)
(b) Extinction correction at sub-L* luminosities
(c) SFRD to same rest-frame optical luminosity limit as stellar mass density studies