Top Banner
Differential Extinction Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History Cosmic Star Formation History Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech) Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt Adelberger Massive Galaxies over Cosmic Time, Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006
9

Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Feb 07, 2016

Download

Documents

zev

Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History. Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech) Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt Adelberger Massive Galaxies over Cosmic Time , Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006. Background. Bouwens & Illingworth (2006). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Differential Extinction Corrections: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation

HistoryHistory

Naveen Reddy (NOAO/Caltech)

Chuck Steidel, Alice Shapley, Max Pettini, Dawn Erb, Kurt AdelbergerMassive Galaxies over Cosmic Time, Tucson, AZ, November 02, 2006

Page 2: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Background

Bouwens & Illingworth (2006)

Two ingredients for determining star formation and buildup of stellar mass in the universe:

(a)Census of Star-forming Galaxies

(b) Extinction Corrections

Page 3: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Maximum Likelihood Method

Systematic effects:

Photometric Scatter, Ly perturbations

Constrain E(B-V) distribution to get LF

Page 4: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Rest-Frame UV Luminosity Function at z~2-4

Z=2.2

Page 5: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Measuring Infrared Luminosities with Spitzer

Rest-frame UV spectroscopy

very accurate redshifts + photo-z’s for near-IR selected galaxies

MIPS 24 micron fluxes individual detections for L* galaxies at z~2

Accurately constrain infrared

luminosities of redshift 1.5<z<2.6

galaxies

MIPS vs. H

Page 6: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Relationship between Obscuration and L(bol)

Increasing dust-to-gas ratio with age

Z>>2?

Page 7: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Implications…

Evolution in average dust attenuation

Page 8: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Implications for the Cosmic SFRD…

Evolution in average dust attenuation Fan et al. 2001

After extinction

correction?Larger extinction Smaller

extinction

Page 9: Differential Extinction Corrections: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation History

Conclusions • Local extinction laws apply to most high redshift galaxies (X-ray, radio, Local extinction laws apply to most high redshift galaxies (X-ray, radio,

dust-corrected UV, MIPS); typical galaxies at z~2 are LIRGsdust-corrected UV, MIPS); typical galaxies at z~2 are LIRGs

• Strong correlation between bolometric luminosity and dust obscuration, Strong correlation between bolometric luminosity and dust obscuration, but z~2 galaxies are factor of ~10 less obscured that local galaxies of a but z~2 galaxies are factor of ~10 less obscured that local galaxies of a given L(bol)given L(bol)

• Specific SFRs indicate wide range in evolutionary state of z~2 galaxiesSpecific SFRs indicate wide range in evolutionary state of z~2 galaxies

• Differential attenuation as function of redshift has implications forDifferential attenuation as function of redshift has implications for

slope of extinction-corrected Madau diagram at high z

Systematics important in constraining SFRD

(a) Extinction correction as function of z to fixed value of L*(bol)

(b) Extinction correction at sub-L* luminosities

(c) SFRD to same rest-frame optical luminosity limit as stellar mass density studies