Top Banner
Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District Report Types of School Value-Added Reports
26

Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Dora Nash
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Differential Effectiveness

Report

Estimates All Years

Multi-Subject Estimate

Table

Multi-Subject Estimate

Graph

All Schools, Similar

Intake, Same District Report

Types of School Value-Added Reports

Page 2: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

All Schools, Similar Intake &

Same District Comparisons Report

Page 3: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Distribution of schools’ value-added estimate shown by a box-and-whisker plot

School with the highest value-added

The box encloses the estimates of middle 50% of schools

School with the lowest value-added

75 percentile

25 percentile

median

Page 4: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

This school has value-added slightly above 75% of all schools

Page 5: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

This school has value-added well above 75% of similar intake schools

Page 6: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

This school has value-added above average among schools from the same district

Page 7: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Differential Effectiveness Report

This School

All Schools

e.g. AAI

e.g. HKCEE

Page 8: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Figure 1

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Figure 2 Figure 3

Schools are different in their value-added performance, but have no significant difference in promoting the academic

performance of students of different abilities.

Types of Differential Effectiveness

Page 9: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Schools are different in their value-added performance but all are more effective in promoting the academic attainment of

more able students

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Figure 4

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Figure 5 Figure 6

Types of Differential Effectiveness

Page 10: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Schools are different in their value-added performance but all are more effective in promoting the academic attainment

of less able students

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Pre-Test

Figure 7

Pre-Test

Pos

t- T

est

Pos

t- T

est

Figure 8 Figure 9

Types of Differential Effectiveness

Page 11: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Estimates

estimate

low

high

95% confidence interval

Page 12: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Estimates All Years Report

Enable comparison of value-added performance of a subject across the years

Data in tabular form

Name/Group Value-Added StanineLow Estimate High2000 -9.56 -7.08 -4.59 12001 -4.02 -1.87 0.28 42002 -1.49 1.24 3.97 6

Group of schools with similar value-

added

Page 13: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Stanine

A stanine is a standardized score with a mean of 5 and a standard deviation of 2. They range from 1 to 9. There are two kinds of stanines,

(a) School intake: To categorize schools into groups with a similar intake, the average AAI was calculated of all students in all schools at the S5 level and the average core 3 was calculated of all students in all schools at the S7 level.

(b) School value-added estimates: To categorize schools into groups with similar value-added

Page 14: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

stanine = 7

Similar intake Group

× : stanine of a school

Normal distribution

(Converted from average AAI )

Page 15: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Multi-Subject Estimate Table

Multi-Subject Estimate Graph

Multi-Subject Report

Page 16: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Subject Low Value-added Estimate High

Additional Mathematics

-3.88 -0.69 2.51

Biology -5.22 -3.42 -1.61

Chemistry -7.1 -4.86 -2.62

Chinese History -8.78 -6.46 -4.13

Chinese Language -7.84 -5.59 -3.35

Computer Studies -4.02 -1.87 0.28

Economics -9.01 -6.59 -4.18

English Language (Syl B)

-3.77 -1.97 -0.17

Mathematics -6.57 -4.26 -1.95

Physics -5.04 -2.58 -0.13

 

Multi-Subject Estimate Table

Page 17: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

 

Subject Group N Subjects OfferedN Subjects in Top

10% VAN Subjects in Top

50% VA

Chinese Language Education

1 0 0

English Language Education

1 0 0

Mathematics Education

2 1 1

Personal, Social and Humanities Education

2 0 0

Science Education 3 0 1

Technology Education

1 0 0

Multi-Subject Estimate Table

Page 18: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Multi-Subject Estimate Graph

Val

ue

Ad

ded

Sco

re

Add

itio

nal M

athe

mat

hics

Bes

t 6

Bio

logy

Che

mis

try

Chi

nese

His

tory

Chi

nese

Lan

guag

e

Chi

nese

Lit

erat

ure

Com

pute

r St

udie

s

Cor

e 3

Eng

lish

Lan

guag

e (S

yl B

)

Geo

grap

hy

His

tory

Mat

hem

atic

s

Phy

sics

Rel

igio

us S

tudi

es (

B, C

)

Page 19: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Both high and low estimates are positive

Above average value-added

Page 20: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Both low and high estimates are negative

Below average value-added

Page 21: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Cannot conclude that value-added is above average

Page 22: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Cannot conclude that value-added is below average

Page 23: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Check value-added estimates listed in Multi-Subject Table

Page 24: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Both low and high estimates are positive

Above average value-added

Subject Low Estimate High

Additional Mathematics -0.84 1.67 4.18

Best 6 -1.88 0.02 1.93

Biology -3.82 -1.93 -0.04

Chemistry -4.33 -2.23 -0.13

Chinese History 1.67 3.83 6

Chinese Language -2.35 -0.47 1.41

Chinese Literature -0.81 1.43 3.67

Computer Studies 0.05 2.12 4.19

Core 3 -0.64 1.4 3.45

Economics -1.44 0.84 3.11

English Language 1.66 3.96 6.25

Geography -4.5 -2.55 -0.59

History -2.87 -0.56 1.75

Mathematics -0.74 1.39 3.52

Physics -3.06 -0.64 1.78

Page 25: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Check value-added estimates listed in Multi-Subject Table

Page 26: Differential Effectiveness Report Estimates All Years Multi-Subject Estimate Table Multi-Subject Estimate Graph All Schools, Similar Intake, Same District.

Subject Low Estimate High

Additional Mathematics -0.84 1.67 4.18

Best 6 -1.88 0.02 1.93

Biology -3.82 -1.93 -0.04

Chemistry -4.33 -2.23 -0.13

Chinese History 1.67 3.83 6

Chinese Language -2.35 -0.47 1.41

Chinese Literature -0.81 1.43 3.67

Computer Studies 0.05 2.12 4.19

Core 3 -0.64 1.4 3.45

Economics -1.44 0.84 3.11

English Language 1.66 3.96 6.25

Geography -4.5 -2.55 -0.59

History -2.87 -0.56 1.75

Mathematics -0.74 1.39 3.52

Physics -3.06 -0.64 1.78

Both low and high estimates are negative

Below average value-added