1 Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Belgium Different types of prosthesis for patellofemoral joint arthroplasty PFJ arthroplasty since more than 20years More than 15 different devices on the market Radiographically proven severe osteoarthritis PFJ No significant axial deformity “Normal” tibiofemoral joint Extended Indications Final decision at arthrotomy? Failed Realingment - Fulkerson/Elmslie Younger Patient with Early Disease Dislocation / Subluxation Failed Patellectomy Post - trauma (fracture) Early Chondral Disease Patella Baja True Algodystrophy Pain Enhancement Syndrome
5
Embed
Different types of prosthesis for patellofemoral joint ... … · 2 Design Criteria: 1994 Surface replacement (minimal bone resection) External rotation of femoral component Broad
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Belgium
Different types of prosthesis for patellofemoral joint arthroplasty
PFJ arthroplasty since more than 20years
More than 15 different devices on the market
Radiographically proven severe osteoarthritis PFJ
No significant axial deformity
“Normal” tibiofemoral joint
Extended Indications
Final decision at arthrotomy?
Failed Realingment - Fulkerson/Elmslie
Younger Patient with Early Disease
Dislocation / Subluxation
Failed Patellectomy
Post - trauma (fracture)
Early Chondral Disease
Patella Baja
True Algodystrophy
Pain Enhancement Syndrome
2
Design Criteria: 1994 Surface replacement (minimal bone resection) External rotation of femoral component Broad trochlea surface, unconstrained in extension Patella captured and stable in flexion Congruous articulation throughout range Improved patello-femoral tracking in mechanical axis 4 (today 5) component sizes
3
How much flexibility does the implant allow for proper restoration of natural anatomy?
Is the implant sized to potentially be compatible with a unicondylar knee replacement if the indications are appropriate?
Are there any tracking, balancing, or overhang issues that must be considered?
Is the objective of PFA to restore natural trochlear anatomy or to be a staging treatment leading to TKA? Is a symmetric device more likely to ensure a TKA-like placement mentality to ensure repeatability?
What is the effect of properly establishing correct and repeatable patella tracking on the kinematics of the knee, and does and anatomic implant support this objective better?
What is the optimum distribution and number of pins to ensure both fixation and proper distribution of forces at the bone to implant interface?
Which surface is the key priority for fixation (anterior or distal)?
4
Less More
Smooth Transitions
Resistance to Subluxation
Absence of Edge Loading
Low Contact Stress
How much does a constrained implant limit optimum placement in restoring natural trochlear anatomy by increasing its control of patellar tracking?
What additional patellar forces may be generated by a high constraint level on the trochlear implant?
What additional soft tissue considerations exist with a less constrained implant?
How do the failure modes change with implant constraint level?
Dome Bi-Concave Tri-Concave
Constraint
Surgical technique
5
Good indication for a well-selected patient population: very few indications!
New anxillarity for better and more reproducible positioning (ML and rotational)