Top Banner
Student Christopher Pettersson Vt. 2021 Examensarbete för kandidatexamen, 15 HP Engelska Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and Japanese A CMT study of English and Japanese idiomatic expressions Christopher Pettersson
42

Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

May 08, 2023

Download

Documents

Khang Minh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

Student Christopher Pettersson Vt. 2021 Examensarbete för kandidatexamen, 15 HP Engelska

Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and Japanese

A CMT study of English and Japanese idiomatic expressions

Christopher Pettersson

Page 2: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...
Page 3: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

Abstract In this study, two sets of animal idiomatic expressions from Japanese and English are

examined based on their mappings. The goal of this study is to see if metaphors from

these two languages use the same type of semantic mapping or not. Dobrovol’skij and

Piirainen discuss in one of their papers some criticism of CMT (Conceptual Metaphor

Theory). They briefly mention two Japanese takes on the cognitive theory of metaphor

functionality in the Japanese language. The researchers claim that the use of CMT does

not work universally because of culture. Japan and the English-speaking communities

have vastly different cultures. Therefore, CMT should not be valid. In this paper both the

English and the Japanese idioms use similar foundations.

Keywords: CMT, Animals, Idiomatic expression, Culture, Simile

Page 4: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

Table of contents

1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Aim and research questions ............................................................................................. 7

2 Theoretical framework ............................................................................................. 9 2.1 Metaphors ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Conceptual Metaphor Theory - CMT .............................................................................. 9 2.3 Source Domain .............................................................................................................. 11 2.3.1 Animals ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.2 Money and economic transactions .............................................................................................. 12 2.3.3 Human Body ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Target Domain ............................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Time 13 2.4.2 Life and death .............................................................................................................................. 14 2.4.3 Emotion ....................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Metonymies ................................................................................................................... 15 2.5.1 PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT ................................................................................................... 16 2.5.2 FACE FOR PERSON .................................................................................................................. 16 2.5.3 THE PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION ...................................................................................... 17 2.5.4 Summary Metonymies ................................................................................................................. 17 2.6 Similes ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.7 Previous Research .......................................................................................................... 18

3 Method and material .............................................................................................. 19

4 Results and analysis ................................................................................................ 21 4.1 Idiomatic expressions with animals in the English language ........................................ 21 4.1.1 (As) blind as a bat ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.1.2 (As) quiet as a mouse .................................................................................................................. 21 4.1.3 Monkey business ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.4 Cast pearls before swine ............................................................................................................. 23 4.1.5 Rat race ....................................................................................................................................... 24 4.1.6 Stubborn as a mule ...................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.7 Beat/Flog a dead horse ............................................................................................................... 25 4.1.8 Black sheep ................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1.9 A Cash cow .................................................................................................................................. 27 4.1.10 The elephant in the room .................................................................................................... 27 4.1.11 Summary of English idiomatic expressions ........................................................................ 29 4.2 Idiomatic expressions with animal in the Japanese language ........................................ 30 4.2.1 ⽊から落ちた猿 – Tree from fallen monkey ............................................................................. 30 4.2.2 井の中の蛙大海を知らず – Frog in the well knows nothing of the sea .................................. 31 4.2.3 蛙の子は蛙 – frog’s child is frog ............................................................................................... 32 4.2.4 猿の尻笑い – monkey’s butt smile/laugh ................................................................................... 32 4.2.5 犬猿の仲 – Dog monkey’s relation ............................................................................................ 33 4.2.6 閑古鳥が鳴く – cuckoo is singing ............................................................................................ 34 4.2.7 鯉の滝登り – carp’s waterfall climbing .................................................................................... 34 4.2.8 蛙の面に水 – Frog’s face to water ............................................................................................ 35

Page 5: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

4.2.9 猫の手も借りたい – cat’s hand too wants to borrow ............................................................... 35 4.2.10 鳶が鷹を生む – Black kite give hawk born ....................................................................... 36 4.2.11 Summary of Japanese idiomatic expressions ...................................................................... 37 4.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 38

5 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 39

6 Sources ..................................................................................................................... 41 6.1 Primary Sources ............................................................................................................. 41 6.2 Secondary sources ......................................................................................................... 42

Page 6: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

7

1 Introduction

Language is something all humans have in common. Everyone is born with it and learns

to master it early in their lives. However, here on Earth, everyone has not got the same

mother tongue. There are around 7000 different languages on this planet. Some of these

languages are more similar than others. In everyday life, humans use metaphors, both

consciously and unconsciously to speak with each other about various topics. There are

rules to all languages and some that are culturally related, which say if it is acceptable or

not to talk about specific topics. There are a few topics which are considered prohibited

by the community. For people to be able to talk about them, they use metaphors. However,

it is not just taboo topics that people use metaphors for, they can also use them when

talking about something abstract. In the field of linguistics, metaphor is something

cognitive and people use metaphors to talk about one thing in terms of another.

In 1980 Lakoff and Johnson published a book called Metaphors we live by. In that

book, they discuss metaphors and their use. Lakoff and Johnson explain metaphors as

follows: “The essence of metaphor is understanding and experiencing one kind of thing

in terms of another” Lakoff et al. (2003:5). They say that metaphors are poetic and

rhetorical, and that we use them in our everyday life. We can find metaphors in even the

most mundane tasks. In the field of linguistics, metaphor is seen as something cognitive

and people use metaphors to talk about one thing in terms of another. This might be why

metaphors are complicated for teachers of foreign languages to teach to language students.

They are often tightly tied together with the language culture Yağiz (2013:956). Therefore,

in this paper, I will be examining idiomatic expressions from both English and Japanese

and compare them with each other. I chose these two languages because they are from

entirely different regions of the planet and have very different cultures. One can see this

in the metaphors.

Analysing idioms might increase one's understanding of them, thus expanding

one’s knowledge of the target language’s culture. I will use Conceptual Metaphor Theory

(hereafter CMT) in order to explain what metaphors are and how one can analyse them.

1.1 Aim and research questions

If every human being has a language, how come languages look so different from each

other, but, at the same time, so much alike? In this paper, I will research:

Page 7: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

8

1. How are conceptions of animals drawn upon in a selection of English

and Japanese idioms?

2. The role of animals as source domains.

3. What types of target domains are used in animal metaphors?

Page 8: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

9

2 Theoretical framework

Many scholars have invested much of their time in studying metaphors. Among the

questions are, what are metaphors, how can we analyse them, and why do we keep using

them?

In 1980 Lakoff and Johnson published their book Metaphors we live by (1980). In

this book, Lakoff and Johnson discuss the development of Cognitive Metaphor Theory

and how the theory is used. Arguably, this book was the start of metaphor study. After

the publication of Metaphors we live by, many linguists began to invest much of their

time into this theory and researched different types of metaphors. A few of the more

notable researchers are Kövecses and Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.., who have written books

and papers about this theory.

2.1 Metaphors

Lakoff and Johnson explain metaphors as follows “The essence of metaphor is

understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another” (Lakoff and

Johnson 2003:5). From this quote, the understanding of metaphor is that it is a figurative

way of speech that has a significant impact on our language.

Kövecses (2010) writes that metaphors are something that humans often use when

we talk to each other. As an example, he explains the conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A

JOURNEY as when people are talking about going through a stage or a good start in life.

Kövecses ends his paragraph with “Cognitive linguists suggest that they do so because

thinking about the abstract concept of life is facilitated by the more concrete concept of

journey” (2010:4).

2.2 Conceptual Metaphor Theory - CMT

Lakoff and Johnson (2003) write that metaphors are not just decorative figures of speech,

or something extraordinary to our languages. This is so because humans use metaphors,

both consciously and unconsciously every day. The use of the ARGUMENT IS WAR

conceptual metaphor is found when politicians argue with each other, for example they

use words that are used in warfare to convey their ideas. Because when people argue with

each other over ideas or events, people will often unconsciously construct their arguments

Page 9: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

10

around the notions of attack and defence. Lakoff and Johnson believe that it is not a

coincidence that we argue in this fashion and thus decided to write down examples of

attacks and defence in arguments. They saw a systematic correspondence between source

and target domains, which we will return to later in this paper. These correspondences are

referred to as mappings (Kövecses, 2010:7). Below follow two different types of

mappings, starting with ARGUMENT IS WAR. Examples of this mapping are:

Your claims are indefensible

He attacked every weak point in my argument

His criticisms were right on target

I demolished his argument

I have never won a case with him

Lakoff et al. (2003:4)

In all these examples, it seems like people are utilizing words and phrases that are

associated with war: indefensible, attacked, on target, demolished, won. Thus, by using

words connected to warfare, we realize the conceptual metaphor ARGUMENT IS WAR when

we argue with someone.

Another widely used example of conceptual metaphor is LOVE IS A JOURNEY which

is very often used as a first example when introducing someone new to conceptual

metaphor. Examples of LOVE IS A JOURNEY are:

Look how far we’ve come

We’re at a crossroads

We’ll just have to go our separate ways

We can’t turn back now

I don’t think this relationship is going anywhere.

Lakoff et al. (2003:44)

In all these examples, it seems like love is an entity or a unit of two. Thus, we find we’ve,

we’re, we'll, we, this relationship. Every example here refers to love, and then we see for

Page 10: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

11

the journey that all these metaphors use journey or being on the way somewhere, such as

crossroads, come, separate ways, turn back, and going anywhere.

In both these mappings we have concepts that are understood in terms of another.

Defence and attack are very concrete to us because they are normally used in warfare.

Because of this, we can use these words to argue with each other instead of using fists or

guns. The same can be found in love where there needs to be at least two to go on a

journey together, and once in a while you will get to a crossroads that will lead you to

different paths. These ideas will be further discussed in terms of domains, namely source

and target domains, in sections 2.3 and 2.4.

2.3 Source Domain

In CMT, metaphor is built upon two types of domains, a source domain, and a target

domain. A conceptual domain is different coherent life experiences, such as life as

journeys, theories as buildings and arguments in terms of war. These domains are then

split into two different types of domains, namely source and target domain. The target

domain and the source domain take care of different things in conceptual metaphors. The

source domain is more concrete than the target domain, which is more abstract. The

following table is a list made by Kövecses (2010:20) of some of the most common source

domains.

THE HUMAN BODY HEALTH and ILLNESS ANIMALS

PLANTS BUILDINGS MACHINES and TOOLS

GAMES and SPORTS MONEY and ECONOMY COOKING and FOOD

HEAT and COLD LIGHT and DARKNESS FORCES

MOVEMENT and DIRECTION

A few of these categories will get examined further to see what makes them source

domains. First, we start with ANIMALS because this domain is what will get investigated

in this paper. After that MONEY and ECONOMICS will be examined and lastly THE HUMAN

BODY.

Page 11: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

12

2.3.1 Animals Kövecses (2010:19) writes, “The domain of animals is an extremely productive source

domain.” We understand humans in terms of the assumed properties of a specific animal.

If a person is a dog, the person might agree to anything even though he is against it. If a

person is a fox, they are cunning and cautious. People understand that the person is not a

dog or a fox, but that they have properties that we assume these animals have.

2.3.2 Money and economic transactions Humans have, throughout history, used currencies of various types to buy and sell goods.

It could have been goods that got traded between two parties or products from one and

pearls from the second. From these transactions a few metaphors stem. Below are some

real-life examples of such metaphors.

Spend your time wisely

I tried to save some energy

She invested a lot of energy in the relationship.

Kövecses (2010:20)

In these three examples spend, save and invested are metaphorically used. You can

see these three words in transactions, such as spend money on clothes, or save

money for a vacation, or invest money into the stocks market.

2.3.3 Human Body Kövecses writes that the human body is the ideal source domain because humans believe

they know it well. Speakers use many different parts of the human body in metaphors.

“Including the head, face, legs, hands, back, heart, bones, shoulders” Kövecses (2010:18).

The heart of the problem

To shoulder responsibility

The head of the department

Kövecses (2010:24)

Page 12: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

13

People know that the heart is the core in the human body, without the heart; the rest

of the body would not be able to function. To shoulder something could mean that

one is carrying something heavy on his shoulders, much like a builder carrying a

log that is going to being used when building a house. The head is at the top-most

position of the body, and people use it to think and deliver their thoughts.

2.4 Target Domain

Target domains are less concrete in their meaning, and they are more abstract than source

domains. Examples of these are:

EMOTION POLITICS HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS

DESIRE SOCIETY/NATION COMMUNICATION

THOUGHT RELIGION TIME

MORALITY EVENTS AND ACTION LIFE AND DEATH

ECONOMY

Kövecses explains target domains as something psychological, mental states and events

and other superordinate concepts that are harder for us to grasp.

In the following conceptual metaphors, the source domains are the concrete

concepts that people can easily relate to:

TIME IS MONEY - You’re wasting my time

THE MIND IS A MACHINE - He broke down

LOVE IS A JOURNEY - We’re at a Crossroad

Lakoff and Johnson (2003:7, 28, 44)

2.4.1 Time TIME IS MONEY and TIME IS A MOVING OBJECT are two examples of a metaphorical

mapping related to time. A couple of examples from Lakoff and Johnson (2003:8, 42)

and Kövecses (2010:26) follows:

Page 13: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

14

you’re wasting my time. – TIME IS MONEY

the time will come when – TIME IS A MOVING OBJECT

Christmas is coming up soon – TIME IS A MOVING OBJECT

Time flies – TIME IS A MOVING OBJECT

Kövecses (2010:26) explains time as an object that moves. He writes that the concept of

time is hard for people to grasp. That is why people use ‘time’ together with the idea of

moving. That time is moving forward is accepted by many to be true. Time can move

both fast and slow all depending on what one does with his time. People find that

annoying things take a longer time and fun things take a shorter time to do.

2.4.2 Life and death Life and death are, according to Kövecses (2010:26), conceptualized as a journey. He

gives the following examples.

The baby will arrive soon.

Grandpa is gone.

His father passed away.

Kövecses (2010:26)

In the first example, they are talking about a new life that will arrive. The baby is a new

life that is about to start. In the second example, a grandpa is a person who is traveling to

the realm of the dead. The verbs arrive and go express how people perceive life and death.

A new-born is someone who has arrived to do something while someone who died has

gone away somewhere. Both these examples are of journeys that living beings take.

2.4.3 Emotion

According to Kövecses (2010:23) emotions are comprehended via force metaphors. He

gives the following examples:

She was deeply moved.

He was bursting with joy.

He unleashed his anger.

Page 14: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

15

In the emotion metaphors examples, we have the verbs moved, bursting, and unleashed,

which are different types of forces. Emotions is an entity in the human mind that act in

different ways. In the first example, someone was moved deeply. Moved, meaning that

the person was touched by what the other person had done. In the second example the

person is thrilled. Bursting means that one cannot hold back something that is in a

container; it springs forth with a bang making the container break. In the last example

someone is outraged. Unleashed, in this case, refers to a container that a person willingly

opens to show his emotion.

2.5 Metonymies According to Barcelona (2003), metonymies are even more fundamental to language and

cognition than metaphors. Barcelona is explaining metonymies as “one experiential

domain is partially understood in terms of another experiential domain” (Barcelona

2003:4). Kövecses expresses it as follows.

Metonymy is a cognitive process in which one conceptual entity, the vehicle, provides mental access to another conceptual entity, the target, within the same domain, or idealized cognitive model (ICM).

Kövecses (2010:173)

These ideas can be seen in the following metonymies.

PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT

CONSUMED GOODS FOR COSTUMER

BODY PART FOR PERSON & BODY PART FOR INTELLECTUAL ATTRIBUTES

CONVENTIONALLY ASSOCIATED WITH IT

FACE FOR PERSON

THE PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION

Barcelona (2003:4)

A few of these metonymies will be explained in what follows.

Page 15: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

16

2.5.1 PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT The easiest example of metonymy to understand is the conceptual metonymy PRODUCER

FOR PRODUCT, examples of which can be found in the following examples:

I’ll have a Löwenbräu

He bought a Ford

He’s got a Picasso

I hate to read Heidegger

Lakoff and Johnson (2003:38)

In all these metonymies, names like Löwenbräu, Ford, Picasso, and Heidegger are present.

These are names of someone that produced something which later becomes a widely

recognized product. The brewery Löwenbräu is an example of an internationally

recognized product that will result in a beer if one asks for one Löwenbräu. The same

goes for someone who has bought a car from the company Ford. The ones who have

purchased a Ford will state that they have purchased a Ford and others will understand

that the person who bought a Ford bought a car and not something else. If one owns a

Picasso, that person holds a painting painted by the painter Picasso. If one has read

Heidegger, the person has read a book written by Heidegger. In all these examples, the

names of specific products come from the one who produced the product.

2.5.2 FACE FOR PERSON In the mapping FACE FOR PERSON, Barcelona (2003:4) gives one example of such a

mapping. “She’s just a pretty face”. In this metonymy, the face of the girl is a

representation of the whole girl. According to the Oxford dictionaries she’s just a pretty

face means that the person only has a pretty face and no other qualities (Oxford

dictionaries – Pretty face). The first thing we see on a person usually is the face. The face

can give many different expressions; thus, we only notice the face and not the rest of the

body. The face will get to represent the whole human being. Even though the body might

currently be engaged in any other activity the face is telling us something completely

different.

Page 16: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

17

2.5.3 THE PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION

The conceptual mapping THE PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION is one of the most used

examples when one learns about metonymies. As an example, the White House isn’t

saying anything. The White House refers to the President of the United States and not to

any white building. Native speakers will understand that someone is talking about the

president and not a white house in Sweden. Therefore, the mapping THE PLACE FOR THE

INSTITUTION.

2.5.4 Summary Metonymies In the three previous paragraphs above, I have looked at PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT, THE

PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION, and THE FACE FOR THE PERSON.

PRODUCER FOR PRODUCT is used for goods that were created or manufactured by a

specific company that is widely known, such as Löwenbräu, Ford, or Picasso.

In THE PLACE FOR THE INSTITUTION metonymy, we can see the White House as a

metonym for the President of the United States.

In the mapping THE FACE FOR PERSON, we use face to talk about the whole person.

Such as using something that stands out on that specific person to talk about the entire

person. The example She’s just a pretty face uses the girls face that is pretty to talk about

her bad qualities. One can assume that the person has a pretty face but is terrible at almost

everything.

2.6 Similes Fadaee (2010:22) writes that the word simile is derived from Latin, meaning resemblance

and likeness. Two objects with some similarities can explain each other. When children

first learn metaphors, they will first learn similes such as, as warm as a toast, Sly as a fox,

eat like a pig. Because metaphors like these are very straightforward, the

straightforwardness of similes will make it easier for beginners of metaphors to

understand the concept of metaphors before they start with more difficult metaphors.

The first similes a beginner encounter will be two objects that stand on each side of

conjunctions like, as and like. These are organised in this fashion to make it easy to

compare the source domain with the target domain. Similes are constructed in this fashion

to make them easier to understand. Sly as a fox and eat like a pig are examples that people

will know because of their simplicity. These similes utilize perceived images of the

Page 17: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

18

animals that humans have got. Therefore, when one says that the fox is sly, that means

that the perceived image humans have of foxes is that they are naturally sly.

2.7 Previous Research

The research from Dobrovol’skij and Piirainen (2005) discusses cultural differences

among a couple of languages when it comes to metaphors. They write that CMT is not

perfect when examining the theory from both idiomatic and cultural standpoints. They

claim that the method cannot cover all languages. One example discussed is the metaphor

wise as an owl Dobrovol’skij and Piirainen (2005:24). This idiom is used to tell other

humans that someone is as intelligent as an owl; this is because humans perceive the owl

to be wise. However, in Finland, the Finns use owls to tell that another person is stupid

(2005:24). Dobrovl’skij and Piirainen claim that this difference is due to different cultural

perspectives (2005:21). They found the same with the Japanese metaphor for ANGER. In

the English-speaking community there is the metaphor ANGER IS A HOT FLUID IN A

CONTAINER. Examples of this are one is boiling, or one is smouldering. In these two

examples ANGER is a liquid that is in a container just waiting to get released from its

container. In Japan, on the other hand, ANGER is seen as something that raises from the

stomach hara ga tatsu1. It appears that Dobrovol’skij and Piirainen (2005) understand

Matsuki (1995) and Tsuji (1996) to be claiming that culture is an important factor

regarding metaphors. Matsuki and Tsuji mention that the metaphor hara ga tatsu has no

equivalent metaphor in English. According to these Japanese researchers, hara has a deep

connection to the Japanese culture as the centre of vitality and as the centre for one’s

spirit. Therefore, the Japanese researchers claim that it is impossible to compare Japanese

to other languages.

1 “(the) abdomen/belly rises up/stands” ‘to be/get angry’

Page 18: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

19

3 Method and material

In this paper, two sets of idioms from English and Japanese will be analysed. Each set

will consist of 10 phrases. The Japanese phrases are from the website Kotowaza2, which

is an extensive database with Japanese idiomatic expressions with explanations of them.

The site is maintained by a person who has an interest in idiomatic expressions and thus

decided to gather them on one single website to make it easier for other people to find

them. Because of the unfamiliarity of Japanese idioms, it had to be verified that these

idiomatic expressions exist and are in use. Thus, I copy-pasted them into the Japanese to

English dictionary ejje weblio3 to see if they exist and to see if there were any English

equivalents to the Japanese ones. After verifying the Japanese idioms in question and

checking their meaning, the expressions got directly translated to make it easier for the

readers to understand the sentences.

The English expressions are from the website idiom connection4. It had complete

lists with idioms with various animals. However, the decision was made to take

expressions with different animals and look them up in the Oxford dictionaries5 to find

the meaning of the phrases.

The idiomatic expressions are examined based on their etymologies and meanings.

The source domains and target domains of the metaphors in both languages will be

examined in order to see where they are similar to each other and where they are different.

There is a possibility of cultural differences in the use of the expressions in Japanese and

English.

2 http://kotowaza.avaloky.com 3 https://ejje.weblio.jp/ 4 http://www.idiomconnection.com/ 5 https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/

Page 19: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

20

Page 20: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

21

4 Results and analysis

4.1 Idiomatic expressions with animals in the English language

In this section I will analyse the following idiomatic expressions. #1 Blind as a bat #6 Stubborn as a mule #2 (As) quiet as a mouse #7 Beat/Flog a dead horse #3 Monkey business #8 Black Sheep #4 Cast pearls before swine #9 A cash cow #5 Rat race #10 The elephant in the room

4.1.1 (As) blind as a bat

According to Kövecses (2010) the animal is the source domain. The Oxford dictionaries

web site tells us that blind as a bat means that someone has terrible eyesight. The

metaphor originates from the common conception humans have of the animal bat. We

believe that bats have poor vision. This idiom is a simile which is apparent from the

conjunction as. The COCA Corpus was used to analyse the usage of the idiom. The

statistics from the COCA Corpus showed many entries with blind as a bat. However,

according to the data, on one occasion the expression was not used as an idiom. In that

case, blind as a bat was a game of tag. A journalist from The New York Times wrote an

article about children who played a game of tag based on the concept of being blindfolded.

Even games for small children will incorporate science. Blind as a Bat, for instance, uses blindfolds to demonstrate how bats navigate with sound waves.

(NYT 2011, COCA Corpus)

Based on the knowledge of blind as a bat, the conceptual metaphor is A HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL. However, it can be more specific with the blindness, thus seeing the metaphor

as A HUMAN BEING WITH BAD EYESIGHT IS A BAT.

4.1.2 (As) quiet as a mouse

Quiet as a mouse means, according to the Oxford dictionaries, that someone is extremely

quiet or docile. The following quotations are from the Oxford English Dictionary (OED)

where these instantiations of mouse point to someone being timid, weak, small, or

insignificant.

Page 21: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

22

▸ a1382 Bible (Wycliffite, E.V.) (Bodl. 959) Judith xiv. 12 Goþ in & arereþ hym, for myys goon out of þer caues ben hardi to clepen forþ vs to bataile. c1425 Lydgate Troyyes Bk. (Augustus A.iv) ii. 3024 (MED) Whi be ȝe so dismaied..Ferful for drede as a litel mows. 1839 C. M. Kirkland New Home xliv. 292 What was my surprise when I learned that our ‘most magnanimous mouse’, Mr. Shafton, the tailor, had been sent down a thief. 1869 C. Reade in Galaxy June 796 ‘Why did you give in?’..‘I've got a wife and children; and they make a man a mouse.’ 1935 Notes & Queries 23 Nov. 366 Mouse.., a person who is timid—who plays best alone.

(mouse - OED)

The quote from around 1382 talks about a person who is deemed to be a mouse. The one

from 1425 someone asks why someone is afraid of a little mouse. The other three quotes

imply the same thing, that if a person is equal to a mouse, that person is weak, timid, and

insignificant. However, if we compare this to data from the COCA corpus, quiet as a

mouse means that a human is as quiet as a mouse, that a mouse will not give away any

noise at all. When comparing the data from OED and the data from COCA. The OED

lexicographers studied the etymology of the word mouse while COCA shows the current

usage of the idiom. MOUSE is the source domain because of it being an animal which is

being compared to the target domain HUMAN with similar characteristics. The mapping is

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL. It can also be more specific, thus seeing the metaphor as

A QUIET HUMAN BEING IS A MOUSE.

4.1.3 Monkey business

According to the Oxford dictionaries, monkey business means mischievous or deceitful

behaviour. The common conception of a monkey is that they are playful. This metaphor

is a little harder to understand compared to the previous two, where the characteristics of

the animal were used to explain the target domain. In the Oxford dictionaries, we find

many different examples of monkey business.

Page 22: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

23

1, “‘Now go take a shower, and no more monkey business or you'll be late for school, she says grumpily.’” 2, “History may not judge Monroe to be the first feminist, but it ought to acknowledge that while gentlemen prefer blondes, this particular blonde didn't settle for monkey business.” (Wilson C. 2015) 3, “They all say they're doing business in that little building, the only business they're doing is monkey business. They're avoiding paying the taxes that they owe.” 4, “Because poll workers using the Diebold machines monitor only the total number of people voting-which the tampering doesn't alter-the monkey business could go undetected, Felten says.”

(Oxford Dictionaries)

In the above examples, monkey business, rather than being a metaphor for a person, is a

metaphor for a way of life. In case 1, someone tells the children to stop doing monkey

business and get ready for school. The children are acting as monkeys when they are

asked to behave and get ready for school. In the third one, the monkey business is used

to describe gentlemen’s behaviour mostly because it seems like the person did not fancy

gentlemen that play with women’s feelings.

When looking up business and monkey in the Oxford dictionaries, one will get to

know the following. A business is “A person’s regular occupation, profession or trade”

(Oxford dictionaries) and a monkey is “1.1 (in general use) any primate, 1.2 A

mischievous person, especially a child.” (Oxford dictionaries). By combining these basic

concepts of these two words into a metaphor, the understanding of the metaphor monkey

business is a person who shows mischievous or deceitful behaviour. MISCHIEVOUS HUMAN

BEHAVIOUR IS MONKEY BEHAVIOUR.

4.1.4 Cast pearls before swine

The meaning of cast pearls before swine is, according to Oxford dictionaries, to offer

valuable things to people who do not appreciate them. The source domain SWINE is seen

as something unclean and greedy that likes to play around in mud and eat leftovers. Pearls,

on the other hand, was something valuable. The common conception is that it would be a

waste to give something as expensive as pearls to someone who plays around in the mud.

Page 23: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

24

1682 T. Shadwell Lancashire-witches ii Coursing had gotten me a woundy stomach, and I eat like a Swine. 1780 W. Cowper Love of World 3 There is a part in ev'ry swine No friend or follower of mine May taste. 1799 S. Freeman Town Officer (ed. 4) 58 He found a swine going at large in the town.

(OED)

The source domain SWINE is something dirty while PEARLS are something of value.

Therefore, a swine should not contaminate pearls. The source domain SWINE can be used

to describe the target domain HUMAN. Thus, the conceptual metaphor is A HUMAN BEING

IS AN ANIMAL. Furthermore, pearls are a metaphor for wealth. By combining swine and

pearls into one metaphor, it will be A HUMAN BEING WHO CANNOT REALIZE THE VALUE OF

A PEARL IS A DIRTY SWINE.

4.1.5 Rat race

According to Oxford dictionaries rat race means “A way of life in which people are

caught up in a fiercely competitive struggle for wealth or power”. The word race suggests

that the rats act in a certain way when they run for food. In the animal kingdom food, is

seen as a currency which shows both wealth and power.

1938 Monessen (Pa.) Daily Independent 20 June 4/2 They are trying to make possible conditions under which politics may exist as a career instead of a rat-race. 1954 P. G. Wodehouse & G. R. Bolton Bring on Girls 219 ‘Is anything the matter with you?’ ‘Just the rat-race. I don't quite know why I've been doing it.’ 1960 Daily Tel. 18 May 17/7 A spirited criticism of ‘the daily rat race’ to get to work in London. 1990 R. Pilcher September i. 15 Angus had worked as a stockbroker in London, but having made his pile, and tiring of the rat race, he had bought Corriehill.

(OED)

In all four of these examples, rat race suggests that a person who is fighting for wealth

and power resembles a rat running towards food. A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL and can

be more specified as A HUMAN BEING WHO IS RACING FOR FORTUNE IS A RAT.

Page 24: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

25

4.1.6 Stubborn as a mule According to Oxford dictionaries stubborn as a mule means “extremely stubborn”. The

common conception of a mule is that it is very stubborn. In this idiom is the mule used to

explain characteristic from the source domain MULE which is then compared to the target

domain HUMAN. This can also be found in OED when looking up mule, “A person having

a quality characteristic of or associated with mules, esp. a stupid, obstinate, or physically

tough person” (OED).

a1500 (▸a1471) G. Ashby Active Policy Prince 564 in Poems (1899) 30 (MED) Thaugh he were an asse hede or a dulle mule, He myght not lyve wildly at his pleasance. a1625 P. Hume Flyting with Montgomerie (Harl.) 162 in G. Stevenson Poems A. Montgomerie (1910) Thy tyrd comparisones asklent Are monstrous lik the mule that maid them. 1846 Dickens Dombey & Son (1848) vi. 51 ‘Now don't be a young mule,’ said Good Mrs. Brown. 1949 San Francisco Call-Bull. 19 Aug. 15/1 It goes without saying that [in American Football] no ball carrier is a success unless he has the mules up front to open the way for him.

(OED)

In these examples people use mule to tell others that someone is stupid, obstinate, or

physically fierce. Therefore, this metaphor is A STUBBORN HUMAN BEING IS A MULE which

is subordinate to the HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL metaphor.

4.1.7 Beat/Flog a dead horse

According to Oxford dictionaries, Beat/flog a dead horse means “Waste energy on a lost

cause or unalterable situation”. The source domain is the animal HORSE. The source

domain HORSE combined with the adjective dead tells us that something is unalterable.

Death is a permanent state, and whatever we do, one cannot change it.

This expression may have come about because of human’s abuse of horses throughout

time. A horse is a physically strong animal that humans use for carrying things or

ploughing fields. By working the horse to its death- it will not work anymore. In OED the

idiom is explained as something that has ceased to be of use. Therefore, it is of no use to

try to make it work again. In the following examples, one sees the use of this idiom.

Page 25: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

26

1640 R. Brome Antipodes sig. Bv His land..'twas sold to pay his debts: All went That way, for a dead horse, as one would say. 1830 T. P. Thompson in Westm. Rev. July 190 What can have led any sensible man, to mount on a dead horse like this? 1832 E. C. Wines Two Years in Navy I. 73 Dead horses are debts due to the purser on account of advances of pay.

(OED)

In these examples, people are talking about situations that cannot be changed. The first

one talked about one person that was in too much debt, which made it impossible to pay

it all back. In the second example, someone is probably starting or taking over a business

that has already dried up. In all these examples people are talking about either a person

or a company that is not going to go well no matter how hard they try. The concept of

this metaphor is AN UNALTERABLE SITUATION IS A DEAD HORSE, or A SITUATION IS AN

ANIMAL.

4.1.8 Black sheep

According to Oxford dictionaries, black sheep means “A member of a family or group

who is regarded as a disgrace to it”. The source domain is SHEEP which is compared to

the target domain HUMAN. The colour black is worthless because one cannot dye it to

other colours. The black sheep of the family is a person who sticks out from the group.

Here below are a few examples of black sheep.

1816 Scott Old Mortality vi, in Tales of my Landlord 1st Ser. IV. 109 The curates..know best the black sheep of the flock. 1833 T. Hook Parson's Daughter III. iii. 63 To pick out of the whole mass of English clergy, one or two, or one or two and twenty black sheep. 1856 G. J. Whyte-Melville Kate Coventry xiii Kate, the ‘black sheep’ of the family.

(OED)

In the first example, the curates know a few black sheep, and who of them are the best at

certain things. In the second example, they have problem sorting out the black sheep in

the English clergy because there are too many of them. In the last case, Kate is the black

Page 26: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

27

sheep of the family. She has done something to become a disgrace to her family. When

looking at the examples and the meaning of the idiom, the idiom's mapping is FAMILY

DISGRACE IS A BLACK SHEEP which is a subordinate to A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

metaphor.

4.1.9 A Cash cow

According to Oxford dictionaries, a cash cow means “A business, investment, or product

that provides a steady income or profit”. Cows or cattle have been excellent assets for

humans throughout time. As seen in these historical examples from OED, cattle are a type

of currency or necessity that humans need in order to survive.

c1330 Amis & Amil. 1855 Al her catel than was spent Saue tvelf pans.

a1340 R. Rolle Psalter xiv. 6 He þat gaf noght his katel til okyre. 1483 Caxton tr. J. de Voragine Golden Legende 267/1 Fader I haue wonne nothyng but haue lost your catayll.

(OED)

In the first example, the cattle were sold away for something else. The second example

suggests that the person gave away his cattle. The last example indicates that a son or

daughter has lost their father’s cattle. Back then, cattle gave a steady income of meat,

cheese, milk, and hide. One did not have to go hungry or be cold if one had cattle. Even

today, cattle are a steady source of income, providing milk, meat, and hide that humans

can utilize for different products. Under Rat Race 4.1.5, we discussed that rats race for

food because food is a source of power and wealth. However, by owning a cow, the family

is guaranteed to have steady flow of food, milk, and clothes. Today cash cow is mainly

used for businesses that make a considerable profit. This idiom is A STEADY PROVIDER OF

INCOME IS A CASH COW.

4.1.10 The elephant in the room

According to Oxford dictionaries, the elephant in the room means “A major problem or

controversial issue which is obviously present but is avoided as a subject for discussion.”

In the following examples from COCA, we see how the expression is used.

Page 27: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

28

1, “Kurt Angle # Just a few short days ago, it was Jason Jordan who was standing out as the elephant in the room and easy pick for the weakest link.” (WWE Survivor Series 2017, COCA) 2, “-PRES# As Stephen Colbert said, let's talk about the big orange elephant in the room. That's humor, Donald, don't tweet.” (Interview with John Kasich,

COCA)

In both these examples, Jason Jordan and President Donald Trump are the elephants in

the room. In the first case, Jordan was a controversial issue in wrestling. In the second

case, President Trump is the elephant in the room because according to many, the current

President is not worthy of being in the Oval Office. In both these examples these two are

the elephant in the room. Thus, the mapping is A PROBLEMATIC HUMAN BEING IS AN

ELEPHANT IN A ROOM. However, it is more about the ideas of the President that stands out.

The meaning of the idiom is a “... controversial issue ... but is avoided ...” A person cannot

be a controversial issue. Therefore, it must be the ideas. Thus, the source domain is an

elephant, and the target domain is a controversial issue. A CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE IS AN

ELEPHANT IN A ROOM.

Page 28: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

29

4.1.11 Summary of English idiomatic expressions #1 (As) blind as a bat A HUMAN BEING WITH BAD

EYESIGHT IS A BAT

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#2 (As) Quiet as a mouse

(or lamb)

A QUIET HUMAN BEING IS A

MOUSE

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#3 Monkey business MISCHIEVOUS HUMAN

BEHAVIOUR IS A MONKEY

BEHAVIOUR

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#4 Cast pearls before swine A HUMAN BEING WHO

CANNOT REALIZE A PEARL

VALUE IS A DIRTY SWINE

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#5 Rat Race A HUMAN BEING WHO IS

RACING FOR FORTUNE IS A

RAT

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#6 Stubborn as a mule A STUBBORN HUMAN BEING

IS A MULE

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#7 Beat/flog a dead horse AN UNALTERABLE SITUATION

IS A DEAD HORSE

A SITUATION IS AN

ANIMAL

#8 Black sheep A FAMILY DISGRACE IS A

BLACK SHEEP

HUMAN BEING IS

AN ANIMAL

#9 Cash cow A STEADY PROVIDER OF

INCOME IS A CASH COW

A SITUATION IS AN

ANIMAL

#10 The Elephant in the

room

A CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE IS

AN ELEPHANT IN A ROOM

A SITUATION IS AN

ANIMAL

Seven of these idioms follow the mapping of HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL. Three follow

the mapping of A SITUATION IS AN ANIMAL. All these idiomatic expressions describe a

person or idea by utilizing an animal property that humans have agreed to correlate with

that type of animal then applying it to a human being or an idea. The similes portray this

very well with the properties + conjunction + animal style of metaphor. Black sheep, the

elephant in the room, and monkey business are harder to understand because we do not

get their properties spelled out in the metaphor. By analysing black sheep, one gets to

Page 29: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

30

know that a person is not talking about a sheep, but a human being. The same is true for

the elephant in the room. In this idiom, we talk about the idea and not necessarily about

the person. With this small sample, one has got two categories of mappings, A HUMAN

BEING IS AN ANIMAL, and A SITUATION IS AN ANIMAL.

4.2 Idiomatic expressions with animal in the Japanese language

In this part the following Japanese idioms will be analysed. #1 木から落ちた猿

Tree from fallen monkey #6 閑古鳥が鳴く

Cuckoo is singing #2 井の中の蛙大海を知らず

Water well’s middle’s frog ocean to know not

#7 鯉の滝登り Carp’s waterfall climbing

#3 蛙の子は蛙 Frog’s child is frog

#8 蛙の面に水 – Frog’s face to water

#4 猿の尻笑い Monkey’s butt smile/laugh

#9 猫の手も借りたい Cat’s hand too wants to borrow

#5 犬猿の仲 Dog monkey’s relation

#10 鳶が鷹を生む Black kite give hawk born

4.2.1 ⽊から落ちた猿 – Tree from fallen monkey

木 から 落ちた 猿 Ki kara ochita saru Tree from fallen monke

y Even monkeys fall from trees

A direct translation of ki kara ochita saru is the tree from fallen monkey. According to

the Japanese – English dictionary Ejje (2020), the meaning of this idiom is “person who

has lost something they used to rely on; a monkey fallen from the tree.”

In this idiom, the monkey is naturally good at climbing trees. Thus, this expression

is used to describe a human that is naturally good at something but suddenly fails at doing

it at one point. One example is if a brilliant student who excels at math and has always

received full marks suddenly only gets half the points. In this case, it could be a monkey

who has fallen from a tree. Monkeys are seen running around, playing, and climbing trees.

Page 30: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

31

Thus, they should be naturally good at it because they are always climbing trees.

Therefore, this idiom utilizes the property of the monkey to tell us that even the brightest

students can occasionally fail. In this idiomatic expression, MONKEY is the source domain

and HUMAN BEINGS is the target domain. The conceptual metaphor of this idiom is A

HUMAN MISTAKE IS A MONKEY FALLEN FROM A TREE. Which is A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL.

4.2.2 井の中の蛙大海を知らず – Frog in the well knows nothing of the sea

井 の 中 の 蛙 大海 を 知らず I no naka no kaeru taikai wo shirazu Well Possessive

particle Middle or inside

possessive particle

frog ocean particle Unaffected by

frog in the well knows nothing of the sea

A direct translation of i no naka no kawazu taikai wo shirazu is water well’s middle’s

frog ocean unaffected by. Oxford reference translates it into frog in the well knows nothing

of the sea. The meaning of this idiomatic expression is “that one should be aware of the

limitations of one's own experience”. The source domain FROG is mapped on to a human

being that likes to stay at home. The Japanese word for frog is kaeru (蛙) which is

homonymous with the verb to return home (帰る).

In the West, we have An Englishman’s home is his castle (Longman dictionary). A

castle is seen as a place where you can be safe. The Japanese use frog and the water well

in a similar manner. The well is safe, thus, making it easier to stay at home instead of

going out in the world to experience new things. The water in the water well is calm while

the ocean can be stormy. By combining the conceptual metaphor AN IMPREGNABLE

CASTLE IS A WATER WELL and A LESS EXPERIENCED HUMAN BEING IS A FROG we get A LESS

EXPERIENCED HUMAN BEING IS A FROG IN AN IMPREGNABLE WATER WELL.

Page 31: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

32

4.2.3 蛙の子は蛙 – frog’s child is frog

蛙 の 子 は 蛙 Kaeru no ko wa kaeru Frog Possessive

particle child Topic marker frog

A tadpole is a frog

Kaeru no ko wa kaeru direct translates into the frog’s child is a frog. This idiom has an

English counterpart according to Ejjo which is like father, like son. According to Oxford

dictionaries like father, like son means “A son's character or behaviour can be expected

to resemble that of his father.”. The Japanese use frog and tadpole instead of father and

son to say the same thing. By using FROG, they are saying that a child can resemble either

of the parents. FROG is the source domain which is compared to the target domain A

HUMAN BEING which is conceptualized as A CHILD WHO RESEMBLES ITS PARENT IS A

TADPOLE. Which is a subordinate to A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL.

4.2.4 猿の尻笑い – monkey’s butt smile/laugh

猿 の 尻 笑い Saru no shiri warai Monkey Possessive particle butt Smile or laugh A monkey’s butt smile

Saru no shiriwarai can be direct translated as a monkey’s butt smile/laugh. According to

Ejjo, the English equivalent is people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

According to Cambridge dictionary people who live in glass hoses shouldn’t throw stones

means “that you should not criticize other people for bad qualities in their character that

you have yourself.”

The best explanation of this idiom is from a picture (cf. below) of two monkeys

laughing at each other's butts for being red while having the same themselves. The

explanation is humorous, and it makes it easier to understand. However, the use of

monkeys is still a mystery. It is something cultural that is difficult to grasp.

Page 32: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

33

(Blog.livedoor.jp 2020)

The source domain in this idiom is MONKEY, and the target domain is HUMAN BEING.

There seems to be something culturally specific about red butts, which is part of this idiom

as well. Because the red butt is a central theme in this idiom, it would mean that A HUMAN

BEING IS A MONKEY WITH A BUTT LAUGHING AT ANOTHER MONKEY WITH A BUTT, this is a

part of A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL metaphor.

4.2.5 犬猿の仲 – Dog monkey’s relation

犬 猿 の 仲 Ken en no naka Dog monkey Possessive particle relation Dog and monkey’s relation

A direct translation of Kenen no naka is dog monkey’s relation. According to Ejjo, there

is an English counterpart which is like cats and dogs. According to Oxford dictionaries

the idiom like cats and dogs means “(of two people) be continually arguing with one

another”. It suggests that cats and dogs cannot come to terms with each other in English

speaking societies, while cats and monkeys cannot come to terms with each other in

Japan. This behaviour is then portrayed in human behaviour when two people are

constantly arguing with each other. DOG and MONKEY are the source domains, while

HUMAN BEINGS is the target domain. However, the focus is on the bad relationship

between the two animals. The mapping is A BAD RELATION BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE IS LIKE

THE RELATION BETWEEN DOG AND MONKEY. This mapping is partly a part of A HUMAN

Page 33: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

34

BEING IS AN ANIMAL, but at the same time it is A BAD RELATION IS LIKE THE RELATION OF

DOG AND MONKEY.

4.2.6 閑古鳥が鳴く – cuckoo is singing

閑古鳥 が 鳴く kankodori ga naku cuckoo Objective marker sing Cuckoo is singing

A direct translation of Kankodori ga naku is Cuckoo sing. Cuckoo sing means that

business is slow. In Japan, the idea is that when one hears a cuckoo singing, there is not

much going on. The Cuckoo is sometimes heard in Japanese anime series when a person

is sitting bored on the veranda. Boredom can be compared to the rolling dust clouds in

Western cartoons and movies. In the West, the conceptual metaphor is BOREDOM IS A

DUST CLOUD. In Japan, however the metaphor is BOREDOM IS A CUCKOO SINGING.

4.2.7 鯉の滝登り – carp’s waterfall climbing

鯉 の 滝 登り

Koi No Taki nobori

Carp Possessive particle Waterfall climb

Carp’s waterfall climb

The direct translation of koi no takinobori is carp’s waterfall climbing. According to Ejje

(2020), this means “to be surprised by the energy a carp has”. Meaning that with that kind

of energy, you will succeed in life. In Japan, the carp is a symbol of strength, courage,

and patience. Every year on the fifth of May the Japanese celebrate Children’s Day by

hanging up carp streamers to wish for the boys to grow up to be as strong as the carp Abe,

(2018). English will need three idioms to be able to convey the same ideas as the Japanese

carp, namely strong as a lion, brave the elements, and have the patience of a saint

(Idioms.thefreedictionary). CARP is the source domain that maps on the target domain a

HUMAN BEING in order to encourage people to be as perseverant as the carps to succeed

in life. The history behind koi no takinobori focuses on transforming or becoming a

perseverant carp while the English idiom strong as a lion says that one’s strength is

Page 34: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

35

comparable to that of a lion. The English idioms do not say the same as the Japanese one,

and the Japanese one focuses more on the carp’s perseverance. This metaphor mapping

is A PERSEVERANT HUMAN IS A CARP which is part of A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

metaphor.

4.2.8 蛙の面に水 – Frog’s face to water

蛙 の 面 に 水

Kaeru No Tsura Ni Mizu

Frog Possessive

particle

Face Case marker water

Frog’s face to water

The direct translation of kaeru no tsura ni mizu is frog’s face to water. According to Ejje

(2020) is the meaning of this metaphor, “whatever happens, the person will have a calm

and peaceful face.”. When we observe frogs in water, the frogs do not mind the water that

splashes on their faces. They continue to stay calm and swim without any worries.

In Japan, they have a religion called Shinto. When looking at water in Shintoism, we see

that water is used in different daily routines, such as cleaning, and mediating to name two

of the daily routines.

This metaphor can be split up into two parts, which enables us to create a more in-

depth analysis of the idiom. Firstly, the source domain FROG, which is mapped on the

target domain HUMAN. The first part is A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL. Secondly, water

which has both calming and purifying elements. It makes WATER the source domain on

the target domain CALM or CLEANSE. Thus, the second mapping is WATER IS CALM. By

combining these two idioms into A CALM HUMAN BEING IS A FROG IN WATER.

4.2.9 猫の手も借りたい – cat’s hand too wants to borrow

猫 の 手 も 借りたい Neko no te mo karitai Cat Possessive

particle hand Binding

particle Want to borrow

Cat’s paw also wants to borrow

Page 35: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

36

The direct translation of neko no te mo karitai is cat's hand too wants to borrow.

According to Ejjo, the idiom means “If you have your hands full, you would even want to

borrow the cats' paws.”. Cats’ paws are not useful to handle tools. In this metaphor, we

borrow the cat’s paws out of dire necessity, because there are no other options.

The Japanese have a good luck charm called maneki-neko or beckoning cat in

English. Maneki-neko looks like a cat that sits on its hind legs and holds up either its right

or left paw, sometimes even both paws. Depending on which paw that is held up, it can

give luck in attracting customers, money or protection.

In this metaphor, the CAT is the source domain, and a HUMAN is the target domain.

Furthermore, the idiom talks about hands. In this metaphor cats’ paws are mapped onto

human’s hands. The paws want to help even though they do not possess the necessary

skill. Making the mapping A PAIR OF HELPING HANDS IS A CAT’S PAWS.

4.2.10 鳶が鷹を生む – Black kite give hawk born

鳶 が 鷹 を 生む Tobi Ga Taka Wo umu Black kite Conjunctive

particle Hawk Case marker To born

Black kite is born as a hawk The direct translation of tobi ga taka wo umu is black kite is hawk be born. According to

Ejjo is the meaning of this idiom, "Having a talented child despite being untalented

oneself.". In the idiom tobi ga taka wo umu, it is evident that a black kite and a hawk have

different values in Japanese culture.

In this idiom, the black kite gave birth to a hawk. The black kite is a normal human

being that is not more nor less clever than any other human, while a hawk is someone

gifted and bright. In this metaphor, the source domains are BLACK KITE and HAWK. They

are not only compared to each other but also to human beings, so the target domain is

HUMAN. Therefore, the basic notion is that this metaphor is A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL,

but it can further be specified into two other metaphors A TALENTED HUMAN BEING IS A

HAWK and AN UNTALENTED HUMAN BEING IS A BLACK KITE. Both idioms fit the category

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL because of both birds being compared to a human being.

Page 36: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

37

4.2.11 Summary of Japanese idiomatic expressions #1 Tree from fallen

monkey A HUMAN MISTAKE IS A

MONKEY FALLEN FROM A TREE A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL #2 frog in the well knows

nothing of the sea EXPERIENCED HUMAN BEING IS

A FROG A LESS EXPERIENCED BEING IS A FROG IN A WATER

WELL

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

#3 Frog’s child is frog A CHILD WHO RESEMBLES THEIR PARENT IS A TADPOLE

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

#4 Monkey’s butt smile/laugh

A BAD HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC IS A

MONKEY’S BUTT

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

#5 Dog monkey’s relation

A BAD RELATION BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS IS LIKE THE

RELATION BETWEEN DOG AND MONKEY

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL

#6 Cuckoo is singing BOREDOM IS A CUCKOO SINGING

BOREDOM IS AN ANIMAL SONG

#7 Carp’s waterfall climbing

A PERSEVERANT HUMAN IS A

CARP A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL #8 Frog’s face to water A CALM HUMAN BEING IS A

FROG IN WATER A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL #9 Cat’s hand too wants

to borrow A PAIR OF HELPING HANDS IS A

CAT’S PAWS A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL #10 Black kite give hawk

born A TALENTED HUMAN BEING IS

A HAWK, OR AN UNTALENTED HUMAN BEING IS A BLACK KITE

A HUMAN BEING IS AN

ANIMAL

We can see that in nine out of ten of the examined Japanese idioms utilize the notion of

A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL. They can be expanded with one characteristic of the animal

or something surrounding that specific animal. As seen in #1. A monkey is gifted in

climbing trees; however, it can also make a mistake and fall down. While #9 utilizes the

cat’s paws and that one must borrow if there is no one else in the vicinity. It is only #6

that stands out because it is not A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL, in this idiom they use the

animal’s song to express boredom.

Page 37: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

38

4.3 Results

Most of these idioms selectively draw upon characteristics of animals to describe and

emphasize characteristics of human beings. In some cases (e.g., Elephant in the room,

cuckoo is singing), animal characteristics are used to describe characteristics of other

things. The specific animal features emphasized in the idioms are, to some extent,

culturally determined, a characteristic which we mostly noticed in the Japanese idioms.

Page 38: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

39

5 Discussion

Based on this small study, it appears that both Japanese and English use idiomatic

expressions with animals to explain human beings. In the sample above, we see that

sixteen out of twenty idioms use A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL mapping. Three of the

English idioms use the A SITUATION IS AN ANIMAL mapping and one of the Japanese

idioms followed BOREDOM IS AN ANIMAL SONG.

In section 2.6, previous research, I mention that Dobrovol'skij and Piirainen (2005)

voiced some criticism about the claim by two Japanese linguists, Matsuki (1995) and

Tsuji (1996) that CMT is not taking cultural aspect into consideration. They compared

the Japanese metaphor hara ga tatsu6 to the English mapping ANGER IS HEATED FLUID IN

A CONTAINER. Indeed, hara ga tatsu, and ANGER IS HEATED FLUID IN A CONTAINER do not

match. However, when looking at animal metaphors, it is evident that both cultures use

the concept of A HUMAN BEING IS AN ANIMAL. Needless to say, the two Japanese linguists

have a valid point that expressions have cultural conditioning as seen in most of these

expressions.

In both languages, the animal monkey is used in similar ways but still somewhat

different. As seen in the English idiom 4.1.3 monkey business, a monkey is considered to

be a mischievous animal, while the Japanese expressions 4.2.1 tree from fallen monkey

and 4.2.4 monkey's butt smile considers the same animal to be talented and playful. Here

we see a case of cultural differences between the two languages. Both views acknowledge

that the monkey is a playful animal, but we reach different conclusions. One say that the

monkey is playful while the other one says that it is mischievous.

The analysis of black kite is hawk born claims that the hawk is something

magnificent while a black kite is something ugly. A hawk is someone with many talents.

While the black kite is an ordinary bird, much like any other bird, it suggests that the

Japanese use birds as a metaphor for beauty and talent, which are related to one's body or

one’s mind. However, the idiom cuckoo is singing, which means business is slow suggests

that the song of a bird represents boredom and not beauty.

It is interesting when it comes to these two languages that even though they are

vastly different, they still utilize similar concepts when creating idiomatic expressions. It

6 abdomen rise up

Page 39: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

40

suggests that we are not too far away from each other when it comes to our mental ideas

of what different animals are and that we give them the same characteristics.

Page 40: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

41

6 Sources

6.1 Primary Sources

Abe, N. Japanese Fish Proverbs. [Online] [Accessed 14 June 2018]. Thoughtco.

https://www.thoughtco.com/japanese-fish-proverbs-2028029 Blog.livedoor.jp [Online] [Accessed 11 March 2020] Blog.livedoor.jp

http://blog.livedoor.jp/nabetosi002/archives/47759618.html Cambridge Dictionary online. [Online] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ Imson, Hannah; Kahng, Amy; and Lekson, Victoria, ‘Torii and Water: A Gateway to

Shinto’ (2012). Pepperdine University, All Undergraduate Student Research. Paper 74. [Online][Accessed 17 Mars 2021] http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/sturesearch/74

Lucky maneki-neko. [Online] [Accessed 29 May. 2020] https://luckymanekineko.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/left-paw-or-right-black-white-or-red-decoding-the-lucky-cat/

On mark productions. [Online] [Accessed 21 Aug. 2018]

http://www.onmarkproductions.com/html/monkey-koushin-p3.html#ideograms Oxford dictionaries online. [Online] [Accessed 17 Mars 2021]

https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pretty_face

Oxford English Dictionary (OED) http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/122954?redirectedFrom=quiet+as+a+mouse#eid35779063 Monkey business

http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/253500?redirectedFrom=monkey+business#eid Monkey

http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/121265#eid36269827 Swine

http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/195871?redirectedFrom=Swine#eid rat race http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/158531?rskey=eIPpgi&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid

Rat http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/158382#eid26698888 Mule http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/123421?rskey=R9bAxI&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid

Page 41: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

42

Horse http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/88583?rskey=O8rEal&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid Black sheep http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/288486?redirectedFrom=black+sheep#eid

Cattle http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/29037?redirectedFrom=cattle#eid

Oxford reference [online] [accessed 01 Jan. 2019] http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199539536.001.0001/acref-9780199539536-e-861

Longman dictionary [Online][accessed 03 Jan. 2019] https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/an-englishman-s-home-is-his-castle Kotowaza, online resource [Online] [Accessed 17 Mars 2021]

http://kotowaza.avaloky.com/pv_wor05_01.html - Japanese Ejje (2020). Japanese – English Dictionary https://ejje.weblio.jp

Animals in Japanese culture https://www.thejapaneseshop.co.uk/blog/japanese-symbolic-animals-meanings/

6.2 Secondary sources Barcelona A. (2003) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, a Cognitive Perspective. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. First published in 2000 as volume 30 of the series Topics in English Linguistics Dobrovol’skij, D. Piirainen E. (2005) Cognitive theory of metaphor and idiom analysis. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Russian Language Evans Vyvyan (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. (2006) [Online] https://www-dawsonera-com.proxy.ub.umu.se/readonline/9780748626502 [Accessed 15/2 -18] Fadaee E. (2010) ‘Symbols, metaphors and similes in literature: A case study of

“Animal Farm’, Journal of English and Literature Vol. 2(2), pp. 19-27, February 2011 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijel ISSN 2141-2626 ©2011 Academic Journals. Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas, Iran

Kövecses, Zoltan (2010) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford University Press. ProQuest eBook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/umeaub- ebooks/detail.action?docID=241281. Lakoff G. and Johnson M. (2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Discourse Processes, 48:8, 529-562, DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103 Yağiz O. (2013) Language, Culture, Idioms, and Their Relationship with the Foreign

Language. Turkey. Department of English Teaching, Faculty of Education,

Page 42: Differences in Animal Metaphors between English and ...

43

Atatürk University. [Online Access 6 Jan. 2020] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/163a/7fc1857d5f36eab2a00e92f578cdfcb0ab1b.pdf