Page 5
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Gastroenteritis Following a Church Supper
Short Title, if any
Oswego
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2007401-N07
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Steps Epidemic curve Food-specific attack
rates Foodborne Staphylococcus
Brief Description
S. aureus outbreak among church picnic attendees, 1940; the
classic, straightforward outbreak investigation in a defined
population
Objectives
Define the terms cluster, outbreak, and epidemic; List the steps
in the investigation of an outbreak; Draw, interpret, and describe
the value of an epidemic curve; Calculate and compare food-specific
attack rates to identify possible vehicles; List reasons for
investigating an outbreak that has apparently ended.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1940
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1940
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Wendell Ames, Stafford WheelerAlex Langmuir, Richard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xOswego.participant.401-N07.pdfxOswego.instructor.401-N07.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xOswego.Ref - Compendium.2006b.pdfxOswego.Ref - Gross.Oswqgo
Revisited.PHR 1976.pdfxOswego.Ref - MMWR Supp 2006.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Epidemic Disease in South Carolina
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010471-510
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Descriptive epidemiology Generate
hypotheses Unknown disease Graphing non-ID
Brief Description
Based on Goldberger's studies of pellagra in the Southeastern
United States in the 1910s; uses descriptive epidemiology and
biologic categories of disease; presented as an unidentified
illness (no clinical info) to focus thinking on epidemiologic
features. Good as either introductory (descriptive epi) or wrap-up
(epidemiologic reasoning) exercise.
Objectives
Apply the principles of descriptive epidemiology (time, place,
person) in the investigation of a disease outbreak;
Characterize the epidemiology of a disease with appropriate
tables, graphs, and charts, and generate hypotheses related to
etiology.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1910s
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1947
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Alex LangmuirRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xUnkDis_SC.participant.471-510.part1.pdfxUnkDis_SC.instructor.471-510.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xUnkDis_SC.participant.471-510.part2.pdfxUnkDis_SC.Ref - Fact
Sheet.doc xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Harkness.PHR 1996.pdfxUnkDis_SC.Ref -
Marks.2003.pdfxUnkDis_SC.Ref - Rajakumar.2000.pdfxUnkDis_SC.Ref -
Schultz.AJE1977.pdfxUnkDis_SC.Ref - WHO 2000.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Jaundice in a Rural County
Short Title, if any
West Branch Hepatitis, Ogemaw County
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011701-X11
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Case definition Epidemic curve Attack
rates Time, place, person Hepatitis A Foodborne
Brief Description
Community outbreak of hepatitis A associated with glazed
pastries, 1968; an outbreak investigation in a community.
Objectives
Define the term epidemic,
Create a case definition and explain its importance in an
outbreak investigation,
Draw and interpret an epidemic curve,
Calculate an attack rate,
Characterize an outbreak by time, place, and person.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1968
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1970
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Virgil Peavy, Fred HoeslyRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xWest Branch Hep.participant.701-X11.pdfxWest Branch
Hep.instructor.701-X11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xWest Branch.ref Schoenbaum.AJE 1976.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Epidemic Measles in a Divided City
Short Title, if any
Texarkana
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2005711-505
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Case definition Vaccine efficacy
Attack rates Measles
Brief Description
Measles outbreak in a community on the border of two states the
Arkansas side with required school immunization and high
immunization rates, the Texas side without required immunization
and low immunized rates, 1970.
Objectives
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a sensitive
and/or specific case definition in an epidemic investigation;
Calculate vaccine efficacy and discuss its interpretation;
and
Discuss the advantages and limitations of selecting a specific
age as the recommended target date for administering
vaccinations.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1970
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1971
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Philip Landrigan, Lyle Conrad, John WitteRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xTexarkana.participant.711-505.pdfxTexarkana.instructor.711-505.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xTexarkana.Ref - Landrigan.JAMA 1972.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Cigarette Smoking and Lung Cancer
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011731-611
Tags / Keywords
study design Case-control study Prospective cohort study Bias
Rate ratio Odds ratio Attributable risk percent Causation Analytic
epidemiology non-ID
Brief Description
Based on the classic studies (both case-control study and cohort
study of physician mortality) of Doll and Hill, 1950's; addresses
study design, interpretation of measures of association, measures
of impact, criteria of causation
Objectives
Define case-control and cohort studies and the advantages and
disadvantages of each;
List some of the biases that might have affected these
studies;
Describe person-time;
Calculate and interpret an odds ratio and a rate ratio; Review
the criteria for causation.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United Kingdom1950s
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1973
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Clark Heath, Godfrey Oakley, David Erickson, Howard OryNancy
Binkin, Julie Magri, Richard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xSmoking.Student.731-611.pdfxSmoking.Instructor.731-611.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xSmoke.Ref - RichardDollInterview.pdfxSmoke.Ref - Doll and Hill
original pub.pdfxSmoke.Ref - BMJ Doll and Hill
followup.pdfxSmoke.Ref - BMJ Stampfer editorial on Doll and Hill
followup.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Enteritis During a Pilgrimage to Mecca
Short Title, if any
Mecca
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011801-611
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Case definition Epidemic curve
Food-specific attack rates Foodborne C. perfringens
Brief Description
C. perfringens outbreak among members of the Kuwaiti medical
mission during the pilgrimage to Mecca, 1979; a very
straightforward outbreak investigation in a defined population with
only 3 foods.
Objectives
Define the term epidemic;
Create and understand the uses of a case definition;
Draw an epidemic curve;
Calculate food-specific attack rates;
List the steps in investigating an acute outbreak.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Saudi Arabia1979
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1980
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Fred Hoesly, Virgil PeavyRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xMecca.Participant.801-611.pdfxMecca.Instructor.801-611.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Vinyl Chloride Exposure and Angiosarcoma of the Liver
Short Title, if any
Vinyl Chloride, Vinyl Chloride and Cancer
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011773-X11
Tags / Keywords
Cluster Occupational
proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) standardized mortality ratio
(SMR) retrospective cohort study person-years
Brief Description
Four cases of hepatic angiosarcoma among polyvinyl chloride
workers, 1974; addresses proportionate mortality ratio,
standardized mortality ratio, persontime denominators
Objectives
Define and calculate a proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) and
standardized mortality ratio (SMR) Discuss the strengths and
weaknesses of the retrospective cohort study design, Describe and
calculate person-years at risk, Discuss the key issues involved in
selecting an appropriate study population.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1974
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1977
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Henry Falk, Richard WaxweilerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xVinyl chloride.Participant.773-X11.pdfxVinyl
chloride.Instructor.773-X11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xVinyl chloride.Ref - Waxweiler.NYAcadSci 1976.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Oral Contraceptive Use and Ovarian Cancer
Short Title, if any
OCs and Ovarian Cancer
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011811-X11
Tags / Keywords
data analysis bias case-control study Mantel-Haenszel adjusted
odds ratios confidence interval effect modification confounding
non-ID
Brief Description
One of the first studies to address the association between oral
contraceptive use and ovarian cancer; conducted by CDC using a
multicenter case-control study design, 19801982
Objectives
List the elements needed for Informed Consent in an
epidemiologic study Outline the sequence of an epidemiologic
analysis Discuss the biases of particular concern in case-control
studies and ways to minimize their influence Describe why and when
to use crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals,
and how to interpret them Define and recognize effect modification
and confounding
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States19801981
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1981
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard Dicker, Peter LaydeRichard Dicker, Julie Magri
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xOCs OvCa.participant.811-X11.pdfxOCs
OvCa.Instructor.811-X11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xOCs OvCa.Ref - JAMA 1983 orig article.pdfxOCs OvCa.Ref - Lancet
2008 analysis.pdfxOCs OvCa.Ref - Lancet 2008 comment.pdfxOCs
OvCa.Ref - Lancet 2008 editorial.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Hemorrhagic Fever in Africa
Short Title, if any
Ebola
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010812-N10
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Unknown cause; steps Case definition
Time, place, person Attack rates Modes of transmission Epidemic
curve Stratified analysis
Incubation period
Brief Description
Investigation of the first recognized outbreak of Ebola
hemorrhagic fever, in Zaire (now DRC), 1976; a practical outbreak
investigation
Objectives
List the criteria for deciding whether a field investigation is
warranted; Describe the key tasks involved in investigating an
epidemic of unknown cause, and, given a real outbreak, perform each
step; Describe the components of a case definition, and develop a
case definition for a new disease; and Given the appropriate data,
perform descriptive epidemiology and explain the importance of this
step.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo)1976
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1981
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
David Heymann, Wayne BrownRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xEbola.participant.812-N10.pdfxEbola.instructor. 812-N10.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xEbola.Ref -Nat History.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
A Mixed Bag in Michigan
Short Title, if any
PBBs in Michigan
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011813-D11
Tags / Keywords
Environmental exposure Sample size Sampling Survey Agency roles
Registry Descriptive epidemiology Graphing non-ID
Brief Description
Based on the exposure of farm animals to feed contaminated with
polybrominated biphenyl in 1973, and the subsequent concerns about
human health.
Objectives
Describe the role of each government agency involved in a
contaminated food situation;
Discuss different options for studying the human health effects
following an environmental exposure;
Calculate sample size requirements for a community survey;
Discuss the reasons for and limitations of a registry following
an environmental exposure.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1973
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1981
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Clark HeathTom Gomez, Dori Reissman, Richard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xPBBs.participant.813-D11.pdfxPBBs.instructor.813-D11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Tampons and Toxic Shock Syndrome
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2004831-704
Tags / Keywords
Matching Case-control study Data analysis Control selection Odds
ratio Bias Confounding
Brief Description
The initial outbreak investigations of toxic shock syndrome in
1980 using a series of matched case-control studies. Case study
focuses on matching, secondarily on surveillance.
Objectives
Describe the concepts, applications, and limitations of matching
in case-control studies; Analyze matched case-control data; and
Discuss the issues involved in appropriate selection of controls in
case-control studies.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1980
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1983
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard Dicker, Ruth BerkelmanRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xTSS.participant.831-704.pdfxTSS.instructor.831-704.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xTSS.Ref - Shands.NEJM 1980.pdfxTSS.Ref - Schlech.JAMA
1982.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Screening for Antibodies to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Short Title, if any
Screening for HIV
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011871-111
Tags / Keywords
Screening Sensitivity Specificity Predictive value positive
Predictive-value negative;
Brief Description
Hypothetical health department anticipating the release of the
first HIV antibody test in 1985. Case study focuses on screening
issues.
Objectives
Define and perform calculations of sensitivity, specificity,
predictive-value of a positive test, and predictive-value of a
negative test; Describe the relationship between prevalence and
predictive value; Discuss the trade-offs between sensitivity and
specificity; List the principles of a good screening program.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1985
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1987
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Lyle Peterson, Guthrie Birkhead, Richard DickerRichard Dicker,
Julie Magri
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xScreeningHIV.student.871-111.pdfxScreeningHIV.instructor.871-111.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xScreeningHIV.Ref - UNC.ERIC.Dx, Screen Tests.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Epidemic of Thyrotoxicosis
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2003873-703
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Unknown cause Agency roles Case
definition Causation Foodborne non-ID
Brief Description
Outbreak with unknown etiology and mode of transmission,
crossing state lines, 1985; a nice wrap-up study, but domestic U.S.
focus.
Objectives
Define and perform calculations of sensitivity, specificity,
predictive-value of a positive test, and predictive-value of a
negative test; Describe the relationship between prevalence and
predictive value; Discuss the trade-offs between sensitivity and
specificity; List the principles of a good screening program.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1985
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1987
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Frederic Shaw, Richard DickerRichard Dicker, Julie Magri
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xThyrotox.participant.873-703.pdfxThyrotox.instructor.873-703.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xThyrotox.Ref - Hedberg.NEJM 1987.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Paralytic Illness in Ababo
Short Title, if any
Ababo
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011891-N11
Tags / Keywords
incidence, prevalence Case-fatality rate Surveillance Case
report form Case definition Sensitivity
Polio Descriptive epidemiology Generate hypotheses
Cross-sectional survey
Brief Description
Development of a surveillance system for polio and lameness in a
fictitious African country in 1991
Objectives
Define incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality rate; Define
surveillance and identify the key features of a surveillance
system; List the types of information that should be collected on a
surveillance case report form; List the factors that can account
for a change in the reported incidence of a disease; Define
sensitivity of a surveillance system, and the effect of different
case definitions on sensitivity.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Ababo (fictional African country)About 1991
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1989
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Nancy BinkinRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xAbabo.participant.891-N11.pdfxAbabo.instructor.891-N11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
l-Tryptophan and Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome
Short Title, if any
EMS
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011901-N11
Tags / Keywords
Surveillance Unknown disease Case definition Case-control study\
Cohort study Bias Risk ratio, odds ratio Attributable risk percent
Causation non-ID
Brief Description
National epidemic of a new syndrome in 1989 quickly traced to a
commercial product. Case study addresses surveillance, bias,
criteria for causation.
Objectives
Discuss issues related to rapid establishment of national
surveillance for a newly recognized and little understood
disorder;
Discuss development of case definitions;
Describe the elements of design and the advantages and
disadvantages of casecontrol versus cohort studies;
Discuss some of the biases that might have affected these
studies;
Calculate and interpret a relative risk, odds ratio, and
attributable risk percent;
List and evaluate the criteria for causation..
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1989
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1990
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Leslie Swygert, Richard Dicker Richard Dicker, Philip
Brachman
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xEMS.participant.901-N11.pdfxEMS.instructor. 901-N11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
A Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population
Short Title, if any
Measles in Burundi
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011911-111
Tags / Keywords
Vaccination coverage Sampling WHO EPI Survey Vaccine efficacy
Case definition Measles
Brief Description
An outbreak of measles occurred in health sector Muyinga
(Burundi), several years into an apparently successful vaccination
program. This case study addresses estimation of vaccine coverage
and vaccine efficacy in the field.
Objectives
Discuss methods for estimating vaccination coverage; Describe
the difference between a convenience sample and a probability
sample; Describe the sampling method used in WHO-EPI surveys;
and
Calculate and interpret vaccine efficacy.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Burundi1988
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1991
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Robert Chen, Bernard Morniere, Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xBurundi.student.911-111.pdfxBurundi.instructor.911-111.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xBurundi.Ref - bullwho00089-0084.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Rapid Assessment of Health Status and Preventive Medicine Needs
of Kampuchean Refugees in Thailand
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011921-211
Tags / Keywords
Refugees
Surveillance Sampling Survey Age-specific mortality morbidity
rate
Anthropometric data Nutrition
Brief Description
Development of surveillance system to identify health problems
among Kampuchean (Cambodian) refugees in 1979 and target
interventions accordingly.
Objectives
List health problems common among refugee populations; Identify
sources of health information on persons living in refugee camps;
Calculate crude and age-specific mortality and morbidity rates;
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different survey methods
for assessing the health needs of a displaced population; and Use
anthropometric data to determine nutritional status of the
population.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Thailand1979
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1992
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-GreenRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xKampucheanRefugee.participant.921-211.pdfxKampucheanRefugee.instructor.921-211.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xRefugee.Ref - MSF.Rapid_Health_Assess.pdfxRefugee.Ref -
MSF.Refugee Health 1997.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Surveillance for E. coli O157:H7 Information for Action
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2007941-707
Tags / Keywords
Surveillance Notifiable disease Case report form Descriptive
epidemiology Decision-making One Health
Brief Description
Focuses on whether E. coli O157:H7 should be added to Oregons
reportable disease list, and the difficulties in dealing with an
outbreak apparently linked to raw milk, 1993
Objectives
Discuss the process and criteria for placing a disease or
condition on a state or national notifiable disease list;
List the categories of information that should be included in a
surveillance instrument;
Summarize and interpret surveillance data;
Recognize difficulties in balancing public health concerns with
consumer and industry considerations in emerging issues.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1993
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1994
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Julie Crom, Richard DickerRichard Dicker, Julie Magri
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xSurveillance E coli.Participant.941-707.pdfxSurveillance E
coli.Instructor.941-707.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xSurveillance E coli.Ref - Keene JID 1997.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Outbreak of Group A Pharyngitis in Louisiana
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011942-211
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Outbreak steps Case definition
Questionnaire
Epidemic curve Food-specific attack rates Epi Info Data analysis
Transmission Decision-making
Brief Description
Investigation of an outbreak of Streptococcal pharyngitis traced
to foodborne transmission at a school banquet. Case study requires
use of Epi Info and two small data files.
Objectives
Define the terms cluster, outbreak, and epidemic;
List the steps of an outbreak investigation;
Create a case definition and explain its importance in an
outbreak investigation;
List five types of information to include in an outbreak
questionnaire; Draw, interpret, and describe the value of an
epidemic curve;
Calculate food-specific attack rates and risk ratios;
Use EPI INFO to perform basic descriptive analysis and
cross-tabulations of epidemiologic data.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1991
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1994
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green, Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xPharyngitis.participant.941-211.pdfxPharyngitis.instructor.942-211.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xPharyngitis.mdbxPharyngitis.Ref - Farley JID 1993.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Acute Renal Failure and a Long Night in Haiti
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011971-111
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Outbreak steps Case definition
Decision-making
Diethylene glycol
Non-ID
Brief Description
An outbreak of acute renal failure deaths among children in
Haiti, eventually traced to paracetamol contaminated with
diethylene glycol.
Objectives
Describe the questions and decisions to be addressed before
departing on a field investigation;
List the steps of an outbreak investigation;
List the components of a case definition;
Discuss the role of epidemiologic evidence in public health
decision-making.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Haiti1996
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)1997
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard Dicker, Linda DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xARF Haiti.participant.971-111.pdfxARF
Haiti.instructor.971-111.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xARF Haiti.Ref - O'Brien Selanikio.JAMA.pdfxARF Haiti.Ref -
Woolf.editorial.JAMA.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
No Fair Warning: An Outbreak Following the 1999 Washington
County Fair
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2005000-805
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Reasons to investigate Outbreak steps
Case definition Epidemic curve E. coli Waterborne Generate
hypotheses Choosing controls
Brief Description
Large outbreak of both E. coli and Campylobacter traced to
unregulated fairground water supply, 1999; another straightforward
outbreak investigation.
Objectives
List the reasons to investigate an outbreak;
List and discuss each step in the investigation of an
outbreak;
Describe the features of an appropriate case definition; and
Construct an epidemic curve.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1999
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)2000
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xWashCo Fair.participant.000-805.pdfxWashCo
Fair.instructor.000-805.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xWashCo Fair.Ref - MMWR.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Public Health Surveillance in New York City Then and Now
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010021-310
Tags / Keywords
Surveillance
Case report form Notifiable disease Syndromic
Brief Description
Addresses basic elements of the traditional reportable disease
list, as well as syndromic surveillance established after the World
Trade Center attacks on September 11, 2001.
Objectives
Define surveillance and identify the key features of a
surveillance system;
Apply criteria for deciding which diseases should be included in
a notifiable disease surveillance system;
List the types of information that should be collected on a
surveillance case report form;
Describe the differences between notifiable disease surveillance
and syndromic surveillance.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States2001
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (EIS)2002
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xSurv NYC.participant.021-310.pdfxSurv
NYC.instructor.021-310.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xSurv NYC.Ref 1 - post-911 surveillance form.pdfxSurv NYC.Ref 2
- U.S. Nationallynotifiable.2011.docxSurv NYC.Ref 3 - Case Report
Form examples.pdfxSurv NYC.Ref 4 - 3030G Case Report Form.pdfxSurv
NYC.Ref 5 - Doyle.completeness.AJE.pdfxSurv NYC.Ref 6 - Global PH
Surv Regs.pdfxSurv NYC.Ref 7 - Reingold.syndromic.pdfxSurv NYC.Ref
8 - DiabetesDiseaseSurv.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
A Multistate Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 Infection
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2002N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation PFGE
Hypothesis-generating interview
Control selection Traceback
E. coli
Alfalfa sprouts
Foodborne
Brief Description
Based on two outbreak investigations undertaken in Michigan and
Virginia in 1997, eventually linked to consumption of alfalfa
sprouts.
Objectives
Describe the unique role the laboratory can play in the
detection and investigation of a foodborne disease outbreak;
Perform in-depth interviews of selected case-patients to generate
hypotheses about the source of an outbreak and mode of
transmission; Determine the most efficient epidemiologic study
design to test a hypothesis (including the case definition and
appropriate comparison group); List three ways to select a
comparison group for a study and the advantages and disadvantages
of each method; List detailed product information that will
facilitate a traceback procedure; Discuss the relative merits of an
intervention based on changes in product processing (or design)
versus changes in consumer or producer behaviors.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1997
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Food Safety Initiative)2002
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xEcoli Multistate.2002.student.pdfxEcoli
Multistate.2002.instructor.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Botulism in Argentina
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2002N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation
Press release Questionnaire Food-specific attack rates Control
measures
Botulism Foodborne
Brief Description
Based on an investigation of an outbreak of botulism among bus
drivers in Buenos Aires in 1998.
Objectives
Describe outbreak situations in which acute control measures
should be undertaken; Communicate information on an outbreak or
outbreak investigation and write a press release; Given the leading
hypothesis(es) in an outbreak, develop a questionnaire; Given
details on the origin, distribution, and preparation of an
implicated food item, identify critical points for the control of
contamination and microbial survival and growth; Discuss possible
barriers to implementation of specific interventions following an
outbreak investigation; Describe measures that can be used to
monitor the success of an intervention; Describe the occurrence,
signs and symptoms, and control of foodborne botulism.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Argentina1998
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Food Safety Initiative)2002
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xBotulismArgentina.2002.student.pdfBotulismArgentina.2002.instructor.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xBotulismArgentina.2002.Ref - Villar.JAMA 1999.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Gastroenteritis at a University in Texas
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2002N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation
Interview; specimens Laboratory Case definition
Questionnaire
Generating hypotheses
Norovirus
Foodhandler
Foodborne
Brief Description
Based on an investigation of an outbreak of norovirus
gastroenteritis among students at the University of Texas in 1998,
eventually traced to a foodhandler who worked in one of the campus
cafeterias.
Objectives
List categories and examples of questions that should be asked
of key informants who have reported a suspected outbreak of
foodborne disease;
List four criteria for establishing investigation priorities
when food poisoning is suspected;
List three common pitfalls in the collection of clinical
specimens for the investigation of suspected foodborne
diseases;
Determine the most efficient epidemiologic study design to test
a hypothesis (including the case definition and the appropriate
comparison group;
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of different ways of
administering questionnaires (e.g.: self-administered, by
telephone, in person);
List key areas of focus in interviewing foodhandlers and
observing kitchen practices in a foodborne disease outbreak.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States1998
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Food Safety Initiative)2002
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xGastroenteritisUTexas.student.2002.pdfxGastroenteritisUTexas.instruct.2002.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xGastroenteritisUTexas.Ref - Daniels.JID 2000.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
A Multistate Outbreak of Cyclosporiasis
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2004N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Modes of transmission Incubation period
Epidemiologic study Causation Control measures Bias Cyclospora
Foodborne
Brief Description
Local outbreak of cyclosporiasis was harbinger of multistate
outbreak in 1996-1997; initially thought linked to strawberries,
ultimately traced to raspberries from Guatemala.
Objectives
Use the modes of transmission and incubation period for a
disease to focus the search for the source of an outbreak; Describe
the two most common types of epidemiologic studies routinely used
to investigate outbreaks; Interpret the results of an epidemiologic
study; Consider potential sources of error in designing or carrying
out an epidemiologic study; Apply the criteria for causation to the
results of an outbreak investigation; List considerations in
implementing control measures before confirmation of the source of
an outbreak; Describe the occurrence, signs and symptoms, and
control of cyclosporiasis.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States, Canada (and Guatemala)1996
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Food Safety Initiative)2004
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xCyclosporiasis.student.2004-08.pdfxCyclosporiasis.instructor.2004-08.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xCyclosporiasis.Ref1 - Herwaldt.NEJM
1997.pdfxCyclosporiasis.Ref2 - Herwaldt.Ann IM 1999.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Salmonella in the Caribbean
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2004N/A
Tags / Keywords
Serotyping
Surveillance Laboratory Incidence Time, place, and person
(descriptive epidemiology)
Graphs Control measures Eggs
Foodborne
Brief Description
Focus on laboratory-based surveillance of Salmonella in Trinidad
and Tobago in 19981999, leading to a case-control study of risk
factors for salmonellosis, and to control measures.
Objectives
Describe the signs and symptoms, means of diagnosis, and control
of salmonellosis ; Describe how Salmonella serotyping can be used
in public health practice; Given a disease, describe the desired
characteristics of a surveillance system for that disease; Discuss
how the inclusion of the laboratory in the surveillance of a
disease impacts the characteristics of the surveillance system and
the usefulness of the data; Calculate the incidence of a disease if
given the number of cases and population size; Characterize a
health problem by time, place, and person (e.g., perform the
descriptive epidemiology); Create and interpret a graph; Interpret
the measure of association for a case-control study.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Trinidad and Tobago19981999
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Food Safety Initiative)2004
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xSalmonella Carib.2004.student.pdfxSalmonella
Carib.2004.instructor.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xSalmonella Carib.Ref - Indar-Harrinauth CID 2001.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Riverina
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2005972-705
Tags / Keywords
Displaced persons
Refugees Mortality rates Morbidity Nutrition data Survey
Sampling Anthropometric data Priority setting
Brief Description
Conduct of a rapid health assessment / cluster survey (including
anthropometric measures) of an internally displaced population in a
fictional African country.
Objectives
List the health problems common among displaced populations.
Identify sources of health information on persons living in
displaced-person camps.
Calculate crude and age-specific mortality rates.
Use morbidity, mortality, and nutrition data to identify and
prioritize specific health problems in a displaced population and
plan interventions.
Plan a community survey based on objectives, resources, and
geographic distribution of the population.
Use anthropometric data to determine nutritional status of a
population.
Analyze and interpret survey data on nutritional status in order
to plan appropriate nutrition programs.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Riverina (fictional country in Africa)Mid-1990s
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Global Health)1997
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Michael Toole
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
X.Eng.Riverina.972-705.student.pdfX.Eng.Riverina.972-705.instructor.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Brucellosis in Kyrgyzstan
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011053-D11
Tags / Keywords
Public health surveillance
Reportable disease
Case definition Brucellosis
One Health
Brief Description
Examination of the brucellosis public health surveillance system
and analysis of data from that system.
Objectives
Describe the key principles of public health surveillance,
Describe criteria for including a disease in a national
surveillance system,
Describe the data flow of a surveillance system,
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of diseases case
definition,
Summarize and interpret surveillance data,
Define incidence and prevalence of a disease and calculate the
incidence rate.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Kyrgyzstan2003
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Global Health)2005
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Julia ErshovaRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xBrucellosis_Kyrgyz.participant.053-D11.pdfxBrucellosis_Kyrgyz.instructor.053-D11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
A Cluster of Botulism Cases in Uzbekistan
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2011054-D11
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation Bioterrorism agents Outbreak steps Case
definition
Line listing Food-specific attack rates
Brief Description
Investigation of a cluster of botulism cases among guests who
attended a social gathering at a home in Uzbekistan on December 31,
2003. Straightforward outbreak investigation case study with only
24 attendees and 8 foods, but addresses botulism as a possible
bioterrorism agent.
Objectives
Assess whether an increase in the number of apparent cases
represents an outbreak,
Optional: Describe some of the features that are consistent with
an intentional or an unintentional exposure that results in an
outbreak,
Describe some of the decisions that must be made before going to
the field to conduct a field investigation,
Develop and apply a case definition in a field
investigation,
Calculate and compare exposure-specific attack rates to identify
possible vehicles.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Uzbekistan2004
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Global Health)2005
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
XBot in UZ.student.054-D11.pdfXBot in
UZ.instructor.054-D11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Gastroenteritis Among Warehouse Workers
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010055-710
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation
Case definition Questionnaire Risk ratio Stratified analysis
Foodborne
Brief Description
Investigation of an outbreak of gastroenteritis among workers
who ate catered food while taking inventory of a warehouse.
Straightforward outbreak investigation case study.
Objectives
Develop a case definition for an outbreak of
gastroenteritis,
Discuss why an epidemiologic study with a comparison group is
useful in the investigation of an outbreak,
Discuss the types of studies one might conduct in an outbreak
setting,
Calculate appropriate measures of association for the type of
study selected,
Conduct a stratified analysis to address possible confounding,
and
Properly interpret a test of statistical significance and
confidence interval.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States2003
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Global Health)2005
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard DickerRichard Dicker
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xWarehouseWorkers.participant.055-710.pdfxWarehouseWorkers.instructor.055-710.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Botulism in the Republic of Georgia
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2008071-908
Tags / Keywords
Public health surveillance
Descriptive epidemiology
Sensitivity
Botulism
Brief Description
Analysis by time, place, and person of botulism surveillance
data from Republic of Georgia, 1980 2002.
Objectives
After completing this case study, the participant should be able
to:
Describe the key principles of public health surveillance,
Analyze surveillance data by time, place, and person,
Interpret surveillance data,
Discuss the uses of surveillance.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Georgia2003
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Global Health)2007
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Richard Dicker, Naile Malakmadze, Colleen Shane, and Eric
Guenther
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xBotulism_in_Georgia.071-908.participant.pdfxBotulism_in_Georgia.071-908.instructor.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xBotGeorgia Ref 5.Varma EID 2004.pdfxBotGeorgia Ref 6.Varma CID
2004.pdfxBotGeorgia Ref 7.Sobel CID 2005.pdfxBotGeorgia Ref
10.Hennessy Rotz.CID 2004.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Cryptosporidiosis in Georgia
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010N/A
Tags / Keywords
Community survey Sampling Waterborne Cryptosporidium
Brief Description
Investigation of a large, community-wide outbreak of
cryptosporidiosis in Georgia in 1987 that resulted from
contamination of a public water supply that met all standards in
effect at the time.
Objectives
After completing this case study, the student should be able
to
1. discuss epidemiologic clues indicative of a waterborne
disease outbreak as opposed to a foodborne disease outbreak;
2. describe a boil-water advisory and discuss problems that
might be encountered in issuing such an advisory;
3. help plan a community survey to determine the prevalence and
distribution of a health problem;
4. interpret a dose-response analysis for an exposure and
development of a disease;
5. list activities that should be included in the evaluation of
a public water system associated with an outbreak;
6. define turbidity and total coliform count and discuss how
each are used to indicate drinking water quality;
7. discuss the typical steps used in the treatment of surface
water at a community water treatment plant; and
8. describe the clinical features, epidemiology, and control of
cryptosporidiosis.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States (Georgia)1987
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Waterborne)2010
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xCryptospordiosis GA.student.2010-09.pdfxCryptospordiosis
GA.instructor.2010-09.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xCryptoGA.Ref - Hayes NEJM 1989.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Norovirus in Vermont
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010N/A
Tags / Keywords
Swimming pool
Norovirus
Brief Description
Investigation of cluster of cases of vomiting and diarrhea among
children who had attended a birthday party at an indoor swim club
in Vermont in 2004.
Objectives
After completing this case study, the student should be able
to
1. list categories and examples of questions that should be
asked of key informants who report a suspected infectious disease
outbreak;
2. discuss considerations in working with businesses that might
be identified as a possible source of an outbreak;
3. outline components of swimming pool design and operation that
help prevent the transmission of pathogenic agents;
4. discuss the action of chlorine to disinfect water and factors
that influence its effectiveness;
5. interpret test results for chlorine and pH with respect to
swimming pool water quality;
6. identify activities that increase a persons risk for exposure
to pathogens in recreational water;
7. interpret results from a cohort study, including attack
rates, relative risks, and P values; and 8. describe the steps for
management of fecal incidents in treated recreational water
venues.
Setting CountrySetting Year
United States (Vermont)2004
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Waterborne)2010
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xNorovirus Vermont.student.2010-11.pdfxNorovirus
Vermont.instructor.2010-11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xNorovirusVT.Ref1 - MMWR 2004.pdfxNorovirusVT.Ref2 - Podewils
Epi Infect 2007.pdff
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Typhoid in Tajikistan
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
2010N/A
Tags / Keywords
Case definition
Hypothesis generation
Water supply Control measures
Typhoid fever
Brief Description
Investigation of an outbreak of several thousand cases of
Typhoid fever in Dushanbe, Tajikistan in 1997 that resulted from
inadequately maintained public water supply.
Objectives
After completing this case study, the student should be able
to
1. list health problems common in countries with economic
hardships, deteriorating infrastructure, and displaced
populations;
2. discuss the steps typically used to develop hypotheses on the
source of an infectious disease outbreak;
3. interpret the results of a matched case-control study;
4. list activities that should be included in the evaluation of
a public water system associated with an outbreak;
5. define surface water and groundwater;
6. list the steps in collecting water samples from a
point-of-use water tap;
7. describe point-of-use water disinfection and give examples of
proven approaches; and 8. describe the clinical features,
epidemiology, and control of typhoid fever.
Setting CountrySetting Year
Tajikistan1997
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
CDC (Waterborne)2010
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Jeanette Stehr-Green
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
xTyphoid Tajik.student.2010-11.pdfxTyphoid
Tajik.instructor.2010-11.pdf
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
xTyphoid Tajik.Ref1 - MMWR 1998.pdfxTyphoid Tajik.Ref2 - Mermin
JID 1999.pdf
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Cholera in Parbatia, Orissa, India
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2005?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
An Outbreak of Acute Hepatitis in Baripada, Orissa
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Outbreak investigation
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2005?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Causes of Hepatitis B in Kerala, India
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2005?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Using Bed Nets Against Malaria in West Bengal
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2006?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Analyzing Malaria Surveillance Data in Darjeeling
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2005?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Evaluating Public Health Surveillance in the Context of a
Chikungunya Outbreak
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2006?
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011
TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM
Long Title
Oswego Masala: Constructing and Epidemic Curve
Short Title, if any
Version (Year)Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any
N/A
Tags / Keywords
Brief Description
Objectives
Setting CountrySetting Year
India
Case Study Source InstitutionCase Study Year Written
India MAE-FETP2008
Authors of Original VersionUpdaters, Editor(s)
Yvan Hutin
File Name of Student / Participants GuideFile Name of
Instructors Guide
N/A
File Names of Other Required Files for StudentsFile Names of
Optional Files for Instructors, Students
Submitted to TEPHINET bySubmission to TEPHINET on (Date)
Richard C. DickerDec. 23, 2011