This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
KINDERGARTEN Beginning of Year Middle of Year End of Year Month 1 - 3 Month 4 - 6 Month 7 - 10 DIBELS Measure Scores Need for Support Scores Need for Support Scores Need for Support Initial Sound
Optional, Not Endorsed Optional, Not Endorsed Not administered during this assessment period Fluency (ISF)
FIRST GRADE Beginning of Year Middle of Year End of Year Month 1 - 3 Month 4 - 6 Month 7 - 10 DIBELS Measure Scores Need for Support Scores Need for Support Scores Need for Support Letter Naming 0 - 32 Intensive
Not administered during this assessment period
Not administered during this assessment period Fluency (LNF) 33 - 37 Strategic
38 and above Core Phoneme
Optional, Not Endorsed Optional, Not Endorsed Optional, Not Endorsed Segmentation Fluency (PSF) Nonsense Word Fluency- Correct Letter Sounds (CLS)
1. The Nonsense Word Fluency – Words Recoded Completely and Correctly (NWF-WRC) goals and cutpoints for risk for Kindergarten through Grade 2 are based on normative data from DIBELS Data System percentile ranks (Cummings et. al., 2011). Empirical evidence of the percent achieving subsequent literacy goals is not yet available for these estimates. Consistent with established guidelines, the goal (core support) is based on the 40th percentile and the cutpoint for risk (strategic support) is based on the 20th percentile. At points when there was not a 20th or 40th percentile the nearest percentile above the 20th or 40th percentile was use (e.g., 23rd percentile or 44th percentile). 2. The Word Use Fluency (WUF) goals and cutpoints for risk for Kindergarten through Grade 3 are based on normative data from DIBELS Data System percentile ranks (Cummings et. al., 2011). Empirical evidence of the percent achieving subsequent literacy goals is not yet available for these estimates. Consistent with established guidelines, the goal (core support) is based on the 40th percentile and the cutpoint for risk (strategic support) is based on the 20th percentile. At points when there was not a 20th or 40th percentile the nearest percentile above the 20th or 40th percentile was use (e.g., 23rd percentile or 44th percentile). 3. The Oral Reading Fluency Accuracy (ORF-A) goals and cutpoints for risk for Grade 1 through Grade 6 are based on normative data from DIBELS Data System percentile ranks (Cummings et. al., 2011). Empirical evidence of the percent achieving subsequent literacy goals is not yet available for these estimates. Consistent with established guidelines, the goal (core support) is based on the 40th percentile and the cutpoint for risk (strategic support) is based on the 20th percentile. At points when there was not a 20th or 40th percentile the nearest percentile above the 20th or 40th percentile was use (e.g., 23rd percentile or 44th percentile). 4. The Oral Reading Fluency-Words Correct (ORF) goals and cutpoints for risk for Grade 4 through Grade 6 are based on normative data from DIBELS Data System percentile ranks (Cummings et. al., 2011). Empirical evidence of the percent achieving subsequent literacy goals is not yet available for these estimates. Consistent with established guidelines, the goal (core support) is based on the 40th percentile and the cutpoint for risk (strategic support) is based on the 20th percentile. At points when there was not a 20th or 40th percentile the nearest percentile above the 20th or 40th percentile was use (e.g., 23rd percentile or 44th percentile). References Cummings, K. D., Otterstedt, J., Kennedy, P. C., Baker, S. K., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). DIBELS Data System:
2009-2010 Percentile Ranks for DIBELS 6th Edition Benchmark Assessments (Technical Report 1102). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Center on Teaching and Learning. Available https://dibels.uoregon.edu/research/techreports/#dibels