www.baker-rds.com Ebrahim Heydari Senior Petrophysicist New insight on the presence of residual oil below contact in the Middle East reservoirs
www.baker-rds.com
Ebrahim Heydari Senior Petrophysicist
New insight on the presence of residual oil below contact in the Middle East reservoirs
www.baker-rds.com 2
u Introduction and clarification of concepts u Objective of the study u Geology u Available data u FWL/OWC determination u Why residual Oil? u Residual oil area u Conclusions u Recommendations
Agenda
Residual oil
area
Why residual oil
Below contact
Applied data Introduction
Conclusion
www.baker-rds.com
u Although presence of residual oil below contact is very important, they are not commonly considered for reservoir modeling
u There are a number of oil and gas accumulations worldwide that cannot be described using conventional drainage capillary pressure curves. In these situations and when there are residual hydrocarbons below contact, the hydrocarbon saturations are better modeled using imbibitions capillary pressure curves
u Presence of residual oil below contact is common in the Middle East reservoirs
3
Introduction
www.baker-rds.com
u To explain why there is residual oil below contact in some of the Middle East reservoirs
u To inform both geoscientist and reservoir engineers of the important role of residual oil in reservoir characterization (i.e. HIP estimation and production scenarios particularly pressure maintenance, water injection and EOR projects)
Introduction Objective of the study
4
www.baker-rds.com
FWL and OWC
u Free water level (FWL): The depth at which the water saturation approaches 100% and capillary pressure is zero
u Oil water contact (OWC): The depth at which the water saturation approaches 100% and capillary pressure isn't zero
PT = Pore throat P – Pore space
.
Clarification
5
www.baker-rds.com
u Drainage: Fluid flow process in which the saturation of the non wetting phase increases
u Imbibition: Fluid flow process in which the saturation of the wetting phase increases
Drainage
Drainage and Imbibition
6
Clarification
www.baker-rds.com
u Reservoir bitumens are hydrocarbons in reservoir rocks which are immobile under reservoir pressure and temperature (Rogers et all., 1974; Lomando, 1992)
Reservoir Bitumen
Note
Normally Reservoir Bitumens are located very
close to the OWC
Reservoir Bitumen
7
Clarification
www.baker-rds.com
Location and study area
8
u The subject was investigated by integration of geological, reservoir and petrophysical data of 3 fields located in the West, East and Mid of the Persian Gulf
www.baker-rds.com
Petroleum system
u Cap rock: Laffan Formation u Reservoir: Mishrif Formation u Source rock: Khatiyah Formation u Trap mechanism: Structural u Generation: 39Ma u Migration: 26Ma
Mishrif
Laffan
Khatiyah
Geology
9/38
www.baker-rds.com
Depositional setting
Field
u The field is located in the eastern part of an intra-shelf basin developed during the Middle Cretaceous within the continental shelf setting
Geology
10
www.baker-rds.com
u 6 vertical wells u 17 horizontal oil producer u 13 horizontal water injector
Vertical Well
Oil Producer
Water Injector
Wells
11
www.baker-rds.com
• Tectonics • Structural Geology • Geochemistry • Stratigraphy • Depositional Environment • Sequence Stratigraphy
• DST • RFT/MDT • Water Flooding • PVT
• Core Description • CCAL • SCAL • Thin section
• C1 • C2 • C3
• Raw Data • CPI results
Data sources
12
www.baker-rds.com
Available data in Eastern Field
13
Data sources
www.baker-rds.com
u 3 wells with mud logs, wireline logs, RFT, DST and cores
u 1 well with mud logs, wireline logs, DST and cores
u 2 wells with mud logs, wireline logs and RFT
u 3 wells with mud logs and wireline logs u 7 wells with mud logs and LWD recorded logs
u All the remaining wells have MWD directional and GR logs, and mud logs
Core
DST
Wireline Log set including RFT
LWD data
Available data
14
Data sources
www.baker-rds.com
u Free water level (FWL) was determined at 2900 mss
u Residual oil saturation below FWL is around 50-60%
Well-5 D
ST
Fluid O
il and Formation w
ater
FWL@2900 mss
OWC determination
15
www.baker-rds.com
u OWC was picked at 2868 mss
Well-39 Fluid
OWC determination
u Residual oil saturation below OWC is around 40%
16
OWC@2868 mss
www.baker-rds.com
u ODT is shown at 2896 mss (base of Mishrif)
Well-4
SIE-5
Oil
Oil
DS
T
Fluid
OWC determination
17
www.baker-rds.com
u OWC was recorded at 2886 mss u water saturation below OWC is about
100% (Residual oil saturation below WOC is negligible)
Well-39 Fluid
OWC determination
18/38
OWC@2886 mss
www.baker-rds.com
u OWC has been encountered at 2930 mss u Water saturation below OWC is about 100% (Residual oil saturation below OWC is negligible)
Well-37 Fluid
OWC determination
19
OWC@2930 mss
www.baker-rds.com
Well-38 Fluid
OWC determination
20
u OWC has been encountered at 2930 mss u water saturation below OWC is about 100% (Residual oil saturation below WOC is negligible)
OWC@2930 mss
www.baker-rds.com
Well ODT OWC
Well 1 2781.0Well 2 2857.0Well 3 2943.0Well 4 2893.0Well 5 2900Well 6 2865.7Well 7 2824.0Well 8 2843.0Well 9 2837.5Well 10 2855.0Well 11 2818.0Well 12 2853.0Well 13 2865.8Well 14 2914.9Well 15 2890.4Well 16 2860.2Well 17 2898 ?Well 18 2884Well 19 2868.7Well 20 2806.0Well 21 2868.2Well 22 2851.1Well 23Well 24 2838.9Well 25 2832.0Well 26Well 27Well 28 2877.0Well 29 2866Well 30 2863.9Well 31 2901.5Well 32 2870.7Well 33 2876.5Well 34 2886.5Well 35 2870.1Well 36 2871.9Well 37 2930Well 38 2930Well 39 2921
Well-37 (OWC 2930 mss)
Well-38 (OWC 2930 mss)
Well-39 (WOC 2921 mss)
Well-4 (ODT 2899 mss)
Well-5 (FWL 2900 mss)
Well-39 (OWC 2866 mss)
Depth of OWC
Depth of OWC increases toward the south of the
field
21
OWC determination Important finding
www.baker-rds.com
Fluid Fluid
Northern Flanks Presence of residual oil below OWC is the main
characteristic of the northern wells
Southern Flanks Absence of residual oil below OWC is the main
characteristic of the southern wells
22
Important finding
OWC determination
www.baker-rds.com
Correlation
23
Residual oil below contact
www.baker-rds.com
Western Field
24
OWC@50% Sw
u Obtained results for Eastern field were
confirmed by other fields
Residual oil below contact
www.baker-rds.com
Middle Field
25
Residual oil below contact
www.baker-rds.com
Well-28 and Well-3 Well-4 and Well-5 Well-4 and Well-28
PVT data analysis
26
Why residual oil below contact? Structural history and sedimentation
www.baker-rds.com
DS
T Fluid
Oil and Form
ation water
u Northwardly tilting……during last 11 my
u Oil migration……26 Ma
u Oil generation……39 Ma
u Structure generation…… 90 Ma Oil Generation
Oil Migration
Str. Generation 28
5
2
Well-5
27
Why residual oil below contact?
www.baker-rds.com
N
Paleo Level
Pc Pc
Sw
Oil displaced by waters
FWL
S
Water displaced by oil
Sw
FWL
Free Water Level
Sw
Pc Capillary Pressure
Drainage
N S
Well-37
Well-39
u Early accumulated oil was swept by water rise after northwardly tilting of the structure and residual oil has been trapped below OWC in the northern parts of the field
Structure Tilting
28
Explanation
Why residual oil below contact
www.baker-rds.com
u WUT was recorded at 2912.5mss (Top of Mishrif) u A paleo OWC is shown at 2943mss u 30 m of residual oil (Sor=40%) is observed between the paleo OWC and top of Mishrif
Location of paleo contact
Formation w
ater Form
ation Wate, Trace of oilr
DS
T
Fluid
Immovable oil
OWC determination
29/38
Paleo OWC
Paleo OWC
FWL
www.baker-rds.com
u This theory is also confirmed by the presence of reservoir bitumen 35 meters above the current contact in well-28 which is located in southern parts of the field.
30
Why residual oil below contact Evidences: Bitumens in Well-28
N
Paleo Level Oil displaced by waters
FWL
S Reservoir undergoes imbibition
Reservoir undergoes
further drainage
Reservoir Bitumen
Note
Normally Reservoir Bitumens are located very
close to the OWC
www.baker-rds.com
u Considering Mishan and Aghajari formation thicknesses in different parts of the field, tilting axis was determined close to the well-2
Probably Axis of tilt towards the North-Northeast
Reservoir undergoes imbibition
Reservoir undergoes
further drainage
31
Why residual oil below contact Axis of structural tilting
www.baker-rds.com
Stress Direction
32
Why residual oil below contact Regional tectonics
www.baker-rds.com
u Residual oil in the Mishrif locates in the northern parts of the field
Flushed area: Residual oil extension
33
www.baker-rds.com
u Presence of residual oil below contact in the northern part of the field implies that imbibition capillary pressure curves , rather than drainage, are representative of water saturation in the northern parts of the field
u For southern parts of the field drainage capillary pressure curves are best for saturation modelling
u Imbibition is due to the northwardly tilting of the structure essentially several million years after oil generation and migration to the reservoir
Conclusion
34
www.baker-rds.com
u The signs that imbibition may be important in reservoir include:
• Presence of residual oil below the contact (sometimes acts as a barrier between aquifer and oil column)
• Dry oil production very close to the contact (consequently higher oil in place and reservoir volumes)
• Sharper log derived transition zone than the reservoir permeability suggests
Conclusion
35
www.baker-rds.com
u Imbibition capillary pressure curves should be used for saturation modelling in the northern parts of these fields
u Presence of residual oil below contact impacts all disciplines not just Petrophysics and an integrated study is necessary to solve or prevent problems associated with the residual oil and bitumens in the reservoirs
u Log derived porosity in residual oil sections is not reliable as sometimes they are completely solid but they are interpreted as porosity in log interpretation.
Recommendations
36
www.baker-rds.com
u Even CCAL and SCAL data from residual oil sections should be used with caution if they have gathered after sample preparing and washing (i.e. by Toluene)
u RFT data from future drillings should be examined for permeability barriers through suspect residual oil zones
Recommendations
37
www.baker-rds.com 38
Special thanks to AFES, Iranian Offshore Oil Company (IOOC) and Aberdeen University for their support in the development of this study
Advancing reservoir performance