Top Banner
Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On- campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.
20

Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Joel Chambers
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus

and Online MSSW Program

Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

Page 2: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Overview

• Currently 24 accredited online Social Work

Masters-level programs (Online MSW

Programs, 2015).

• Programs range from fully online to hybrid

where students have to meet on campus

periodically.

• Current literature suggests this shift towards

online learning will continue.

Online Education in Social Work

Page 3: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Kent School of Social Work

Development of an Online MSSW Program

• 2012: Online 60-hr MSSW program was

established and 25 students were admitted.

• 2013: Online program expanded to admit

50 students.

• 2014: Began accepting 30-hr Advanced

Standing students in addition to 60 hr-

students.

Page 4: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

• Standard 60-hour Program • Fall semester start date • For students with a Bachelor’s degree in a discipline other than Social

Work.

• Advanced Standing 30-hour Program • Summer and Fall semester start dates • For students that have already earned a Bachelor’s in Social Work.

• Specializations • Gerontology (Online and On-campus) • Psychosocial Oncology (Online and On-campus) • Military (Online and On-campus) • Mental Health (Online and On-campus) • School Social Work (On-campus) • Couple and Family Therapy (On-campus) • Alcohol and Drug Counseling (On-campus)

Programs and Specializations

Page 5: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

• Online program • Independent learners • Students looking for flexibility in when they take

courses. • Rural areas without access to a nearby graduate

program.

• On-campus program • For students looking for the traditional graduate

school environment.

• Admissions requirements are the same for

both programs.

Different Programs, Different Students

Page 6: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Research Question: Is there equivalency between the online and

on-campus programs?

Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program

Page 7: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Admission Information

• Bachelor’s degree from a regionally accredited institution of

higher learning

• A minimum 27 credit hours in social sciences, i.e.

communications (6), natural sciences (3), humanities (9), and

• A minimum of 3 credit hours in each of the following

prerequisite courses: statistics, research methods, and

human biology.

• 3 letters of recommendation

• Prospective students with less than 2.75 GPA must take the

GRE or MAT.

• Advanced Standing Students: • Minimum GPA of 3.0 in undergraduate courses • Minimum GPA of 3.25 in social work courses

Sample Requirements

Page 8: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

• Includes students that were accepted and

enrolled in the Kent School of Social Work

between 2012 and 2014 in both the on-

campus and on-line programs.

• Total sample included 597students • 192 online students and 405 on-campus students• 20 students classified as hybrid (equal

online/on-campus classes) were eliminated from sample.

Sample

Page 9: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Demographics

• Age

• Gender

• Race

Academic Background

• Undergraduate Major Type

• Undergraduate Institution

• Incoming GPA

• Critical Thinking Scores

Predisposing Characteristic Variables

Page 10: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Biglan Classification (1973)

• Categorization of academic

areas as either hard or

soft. • Hard : more science-oriented

areas with an agreed upon body of theory.

• Categorization of academic

areas as either applied or

pure.

Undergraduate Major Type

Page 11: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Carnegie Center Classification (updated 2010)

• Utilized the basic classification system.

• Institutions were categorized by type: • Doctoral/research university • Master’s colleges and universities • Baccalaureate Colleges • Specialized institutions • Tribal colleges and universities

Undergraduate Institution

Page 12: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST)

• Multiple choice test geared towards measuring the

core reasoning skills of students.

• Provides an overall score and scores in 5 sub areas.

• Subscales include: • Analysis • Inference • Evaluation • Deduction • Induction

• Students at Kent School take the CCTST before

beginning the program and upon completion of

program.

Critical Thinking Skills

Page 13: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

• CSWE competencies • A mean score was calculated for the combination

of all competencies. • Competencies are measured through rubric

scores, practicum evaluations and through self-efficacy assessments.

• Cumulative GPA • Average grade point average for graduate courses

taken at Kent School.

• CCTST Post-scores

Outcome Variables

Page 14: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Predisposing Characteristics- Demographics

Results

Variable Online On-campus P-value

Age 34 years SD=8.09

31 years SD=8.79

.001***

Gender 85% female 85% female .989

Race 77% white 74% white .465

Page 15: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Predisposing Characteristics-Academic Background

Results Variable Online On-campus P-value

Undergraduate Major

73% Soft and Applied

Majors

43% Soft and Pure Majors

.001***

Undergraduate Institution

50% Master’s

Institutions

58% Doctoral/Research Institutions

.001***

Incoming GPA Mean= 3.35 SD=.391

Mean=3.35 SD=.356

.957

CCTST Pre-score

Mean=17.14

SD=4.51

Mean=16.7SD=5.17

.344

Page 16: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Outcome Variables

Results

Variable Online On-campus P-value

Cumulative GPA

Mean=3.44 SD=1.05

Mean=3.50SD=.87

.414

Competency

Scores

Mean=3.84SD=.64

Mean=3.72SD=.67

.056

CCTST Post-test

Mean= 18.65SD=3.97

Mean=17.71SD=5.17

.234

Page 17: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Different Backgrounds

Discussion

Online

OlderSoft and applied undergraduate majorsMasters Undergraduate Institutions

On Campus

Younger Soft and pure undergraduate majorsDoctoral Research Institutions

The programs cater for different type students

Page 18: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Different Backgrounds

Online On-campus

Older Students Younger students

Soft and Applied Majors (Ex: Accounting, Finance,

education)

Soft and Pure Majors (ex: Social Work)

Master’s level Institutions Doctoral/Research Institutions

Page 19: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Outcomes

Cumulative GPAMean competency scoresPost critical thinking scores

The programs have similar outcomes

Page 20: Development of CSWE Competency Equivalency Between An On-campus and Online MSSW Program Anna C. Faul, PhD. Samantha Cotton, MSSW Pamela Yankeelov, PhD.

L O U I S V I L L E . E D U

Structure of the Program

• Alignment between on-campus and online

course curriculum

• Instructor Factor • Majority of the online instructors have

taught the same courses on-campus. • Majority of sequences have a senior

instructor teaching online.

• Increases quality control and integrity of

social work online programs (Reamer, 2013)

Implications